Mick looks so laid-back in this interview. Mick is looking fine as wine 🍷. He has a beautiful accent. He has a love for the U.S. he is very calm in his demeanor. He is very serious about his music 🎶 🎵 and his songwriting 🎉🎉. He definitely loves what he does. He's love acting as well. He's very versatile in all that he does. He likes to step out into new things🎉🎉.
It could be, because although they mention Performance (finished 1968), they don't discuss at all the delay in release (1970), which I think they would have. :0)
Mick Jagger really nailed it with a political situation in this country, if you think about it that's exactly what's going on now today and it must have started back in the '70s, as an aftermath of the 60s
This is 1970. Interview mentions the movie Performance multiple times. Some artwork from the movie in the backdrop. This was filmed in London as he mentions. I’d assume it was filmed right around the release of the movie which was August of 1970
@@MethildeThere are always people around who want to burn down anything unusual and interesting that crashes the norm. They were probably hoping for another John Wayne movie. :0)
So ❤ed Micks look in the early 70s. Did so much art works of Jagger in the 70s. But odd that he's talking so low in this interview. Mick was so damn sexy in the late 60s & early 70s. Loved his charisma. Didn't care for his acting in Ned Kelly though. But Micks still full of energy with his wellness routine. I hope he lives to see youngest son on stage. ❤
This is 1971 and it makes me wonder how Mick feels now. To get things done you must work hard. 1971, or 1969? Performance is a that never made it to middle America. When it came out, it went to the big cities only.💜🌹🐟🐏🦄🌸😇🐎🐪🌱🐠🐐🐞🍀🐡🦗🐓🌼🐹🌿🦂💥🐈🥴😻💋🧡☘💜🌹🐟🐏🦄🌸😇🐎🐪🌱🌿🐹🌼🐓🦗🐡🍀🐞🐐🐠🦂💥🐈🥴😻💋🧡☘
![Mick Jagger • Interviews/Press Conferences/B-Roll (“Ned Kelly”) • 1969 [RITY Archive]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/61bG57U1KiU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Mick Jagger • Interviews/Press Conferences/B-Roll (“Ned Kelly”) • 1969 [RITY Archive]](/img/tr.png)
Mick looks so laid-back in this interview. Mick is looking fine as wine 🍷. He has a beautiful accent. He has a love for the U.S. he is very calm in his demeanor. He is very serious about his music 🎶 🎵 and his songwriting 🎉🎉. He definitely loves what he does. He's love acting as well. He's very versatile in all that he does. He likes to step out into new things🎉🎉.
he was probably drunk or stoned
Beautiful man. Magnetic
Best front man in the history of history. He set the standard for everyone else
Please...don't embarrass yourself.
You're exactly correct
Lol.
Jagger and Pop! :0)
@@danorthsidemang3834You have 95 videos on this video alone. Talk about embarrassing oneself. What a loser 🤣
He's so adorable
Unfortunately, he doesn't keep regular hours.
I think this was to promote the film performance, in which Mick played a rock star.
You mean himself
You don’t have to think it. He said PEFORMANCE in the end.
Mick’s chewing noises are the only ones I allow lol
Wow! Never seen this before! I'd say it's even earlier, 1968...
It could be, because although they mention Performance (finished 1968), they don't discuss at all the delay in release (1970), which I think they would have. :0)
Mick Jagger really nailed it with a political situation in this country, if you think about it that's exactly what's going on now today and it must have started back in the '70s, as an aftermath of the 60s
Changed the world
This is 1970. Interview mentions the movie Performance multiple times. Some artwork from the movie in the backdrop. This was filmed in London as he mentions. I’d assume it was filmed right around the release of the movie which was August of 1970
Performance was filmed in late 1968. However, it was not released until 1970 due to it’s content which had to be edited.
@@BigSky1 when the americans producers saw the movie for the first time, some wanted to burn it :)
@@MethildeThere are always people around who want to burn down anything unusual and interesting that crashes the norm. They were probably hoping for another John Wayne movie. :0)
Oh wow 😮 i've never seen this before 😮
Can’t believe a young Mick Jagger could see how America was divided decades ago.
So ❤ed Micks look in the early 70s. Did so much art works of Jagger in the 70s. But odd that he's talking so low in this interview. Mick was so damn sexy in the late 60s & early 70s. Loved his charisma. Didn't care for his acting in Ned Kelly though. But Micks still full of energy with his wellness routine. I hope he lives to see youngest son on stage. ❤
Great movie with James Fox, realized by Donald Cammell and Nicolas and a fantastic soundtrack
Munching on food during interviews was almost a trademark of his.
It wouldn't fly for any artist today. It was of its time...
But, it belongs to Mick.
This literally might be the only interview where he ever munches on anything.
@@Viajealduende There's absolutely nothing rebellious about eating food during interviews.😂
@@Viajealduende Mick Jagger has never been cool.
@@Revolver1981 Not cool enough for you?
Original Jumping Jack Flash video
ruclips.net/video/qGd7SkdETro/видео.htmlsi=0ln43FRxP_3SDedg
@@Viajealduende No I don't think Liam Gallagher and Paul McCartney are cool either. Lennon and Richards are though.👍🏻
The three chocolates are the real stars of this interview.
Grapes
Great upload, never knew this interview existed. Must be September 1968, while filming Performance.
68 or 69????
Behind them it's a piece of Performance movie set.
@@Methilde🤣 -
1968 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_(film)#
Flying high!!!
I'd say that's 1969 whilst filming Performance.
The blood spattered background is from a scene in Chas's flat in the film
YES, YOU'RE RIGHT!
And Jagger have still the same black dyed hairs than in the movie.
Performance wrapped filming in the Fall of 1968.
Could be 1970 -- as they mention Performance. But it was finished in '68 and release held up until 1970. So could anywhere along that timeline. :0)
I am grom MPLS MN and i can say that i can remember Bill Carlson and wccp. But was this a real interview??????
TRES Cool
His hair is dyed black as in Performance which was filmed in 1968.
Altamont, 1969, compare with Keith's natural hair color: sfae.com/ECommerceSite/files/e9/e97870d7-eb86-4eb8-886d-fab580b786df.jpg
This seems like its from the filming of 'Performance" so it shoud be dated Autumn '68
Yea 1970 is probably right if they’re talking about his movie performance which came out in 70 or 71 can’t remember at the top of my head
Grapes, Murder, it's just a shot away....
LOL
Likely 1969 because he didn't ask about Altamont.
A contriving front singer
1971
0:37 Wait until you get to 2023 then! Strangling all day long! :0/
Legalise marijuana!❤😂
Prescience
Yes, he already talks about America cut in two.
Thic cant be real!!! ???????
This is 1971 and it makes me wonder how Mick feels now. To get things done you must work hard. 1971, or 1969? Performance is a that never made it to middle America. When it came out, it went to the big cities only.💜🌹🐟🐏🦄🌸😇🐎🐪🌱🐠🐐🐞🍀🐡🦗🐓🌼🐹🌿🦂💥🐈🥴😻💋🧡☘💜🌹🐟🐏🦄🌸😇🐎🐪🌱🌿🐹🌼🐓🦗🐡🍀🐞🐐🐠🦂💥🐈🥴😻💋🧡☘
Thank you for highlighting my comment.🐟🐏🐈🌱🐪🐓🐹😻🦄🐞🌼🌹🐐🌸🌿🌿💥☘🐎😇🥴🐍🐸🐊🐢🦎🦎🐱🐱⚘⚘🍀
No, 1971 Stones are in Exile.
@@BigSky1 You're right, it's filmed in the decor of Performance.
Could be 1970 -- as they mention Performance. But it was finished in '68 and release held up until 1970. So could anywhere along that timeline. :0)