A Non-Standard Equation | Math Contests
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 фев 2024
- 🤩 Hello everyone, I'm very excited to bring you a new channel (aplusbi)
Enjoy...and thank you for your support!!! 🧡🥰🎉🥳🧡
/ @sybermathshorts
/ @aplusbi
⭐ Join this channel to get access to perks:→ bit.ly/3cBgfR1
My merch → teespring.com/stores/sybermat...
Follow me → / sybermath
Subscribe → ruclips.net/user/SyberMath?sub...
⭐ Suggest → forms.gle/A5bGhTyZqYw937W58
If you need to post a picture of your solution or idea:
intent/tweet?text...
#algebra #challenge #exponents
via @RUclips @Apple @Desmos @NotabilityApp @googledocs @canva
PLAYLISTS 🎵 :
Number Theory Problems: • Number Theory Problems
Challenging Math Problems: • Challenging Math Problems
Trigonometry Problems: • Trigonometry Problems
Diophantine Equations and Systems: • Diophantine Equations ...
Calculus: • Calculus
As you showed by each function (1/2)^x or 2^(-x) is a decreasing function meeting with the linear line functiom (1)(x + 6) that increases in the same intervals. The play with W Lambert function on the ratio to the power eaualling the linear line was interesting! ☺️👍
I taught high school math for 35 years so I recognize an excellent teacher. Over the past year or so I am so impressed with your ability to explain complex ideas in an easily understood fashion. Yes I should join your site because I try a lot of your questions and then watch your approaches to the solutions. I particularly like your multiple solution approaches with a graphical approach at the end. I am a math major and must admit I never heard of Lambert's function before seeing you applying it. Very cool.
this was very beautiful
Thank you!
On the first look of it I used -2 😆
x=(W(64ln2)/ln2)-6=4-6=-2
I found x=-2 and it is the only one solution because y=x+6 is an increasing funcion while y= 1/2 is a decreasing funcion
I also got -2 as the only solution.
Awesome!
Thank you! Cheers!
Very nice equation- thanks a lot👌
Glad you liked it
So amazing... learn alot...❤❤❤.
Thank you so much 😀
I was glad to see you work out what W(n) was without Wolfram Alpha. With x being an integer, I knew there had to be a way.
One thing about how my brain works: I would have just divided ln16/ln2 = log_2(16) = 4. Probably because I never knew about being able to move log down until I started warching your videos. I passed freaking Calculus without ever using ln(2^x) = xln2.
Glad to hear that! Thanks for your comment
nice
Thanks
x = -2
X=-2....is the only solution...
Verified graphically
Geographycally
A Non-Standard Equation: (1/2)ˣ = x + 6; x = ?
(1/2)ˣ = 1/2ˣ = x + 6, 2ˣ(x + 6) = 1; x < 0
Solving the exponential equation using Trial-and-error math:
x = - 1: 2ˣ(x + 6) = (- 1 + 6)/2 = 5/2 > 1
x = - 3: (- 3 + 6)/8 = 3/8 < 1; - 1 > x > - 3
x = - 2: 2ˣ(x + 6) = (- 2 + 6)/4 = 1; Proved
Answer check:
(1/2)ˣ = x + 6; Confirmed as shown
Final answer:
x = - 2
Lnlnlnlnlnlnlnlnonlnlnknonlnlnlnlnlnlnlmpbknlnlnlnlnlnlnlnlnlnlnlnlmlnlnlnlnlnlnlnnllnlnlnlnlklnljlnlnlmnklnnlmnnllnnnlmnnklnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnlllllllllllbbnnnnnnmnm
😮😜😁
Most important lesson here: manipulate equations but NOT people 🤗😔