Must say that i like the sound more in the atoll. But i can hear that most importantly in hifi, and its from the accuphase. More realism in the sound. So i bet that in room accuphase sounds more hifi. But a very good sounding Atoll 👌 And yes....big price difference
Piano has more realistic timbre on the Accuphase and it feels more neutral overall, an easy listen. Atoll seems "voiced" by comparison and may or may not sound better in person or with different speakers. The Supertramp track is "brighter" on the Accuphase but also more natural, Atoll has less top end treble but a bit of edge/glare in the upper mids which would be tiring. Accuphase has tone controls which could help with the worst recordings without affecting the timbre.
Atoll showing the truth and Accuphase is on the Marshmallow side of Life (in a good way) would be to much Jelly for Long listening Sessions. I Prefer Atoll, espacially with the A Perfect Circle Song.
Ein Unterschied wie Tag und Nacht, Accuphase holt wesentlich mehr aus dem gleichen Grundmaterial heraus, eine wesentlich weitere Staffelung, ein Mehr an Information in allen Frequenz- und Lebenslagen. Beachtet man den Preisunterschied, ist der Atoll aber ebenfalls eine Versuchung. Nicht zuletzt eine Frage des persönlichen Geschmacks und des Geldbeutels. Zum Schluss muss das Ganze auch noch mit den vorhandenen Schallwandlern harmonieren. Ich würde sagen der Atoll tönt und der Accuphase klingt. 🎶
Why compare two devices with such different prices? Accuphase E 280 (or at least the E380) would have been a fairer comparison! second point: One is 2x160W class AB the other one 2x30W class A (8ohms). The result is not a mystery, normally you get better bass control with the AB and a more warm/open medium with the class A, and you must choose the most effective HP for each case (this one have a 30cm boomer). So doing a compair of 2 very différents amps will give a different result if you change HP.
Listening with a Focal Stellia. No difference for me in a blind test, the only worthy one. So much difference between two pairs of speakers. So few between 2 amplifiers of the same category. So Atoll for those who choose with one ear on the music and one eye on their bank accounts. Accuphase for those who prestige is part of the pleasure.
Atoll has more natural piano sound, in the first song. Also, the bass is meatier ( full bodied ) in the last song. I prefer overall sound picture of Atoll IN 400SE, over the Accuphase E 600.
Atoll wins, the Accuphase is too mushy, so much loss of transient detail by comparison. And this worsens the more dense the music gets, especially the last track.
A parte che giudicare dal telefono e' un assurdita: ma sembra che per la differenza di prezzo vince atoll. Io ho un lettore atoll e suona da dio. Con ampli yba integre'. Diffusori sonus faber minima amator.
Wybrałbym Atola. Ale ani jeden ani drugi nie jest wart tych pieniędzy, które trzeba za nie zapłacić. W tych pieniądzach kupię lepszy wzmacniacz i wystarczy mi na rok na płyty.
New Price of the Accuphase around 2013 -2018 11000 Euro.The Atoll is around 4500 Euro.Huge price difference.Atoll all day!!Michael from Germany
Must say that i like the sound more in the atoll.
But i can hear that most importantly in hifi, and its from the accuphase.
More realism in the sound.
So i bet that in room accuphase sounds more hifi.
But a very good sounding Atoll 👌
And yes....big price difference
The only thing good about accuphase is smooth bass,but i will definetily buy the Atoll.The treble and mids are fantastic.
Atoll has better definition and separation. Accuphase is more open, airy.
Piano has more realistic timbre on the Accuphase and it feels more neutral overall, an easy listen. Atoll seems "voiced" by comparison and may or may not sound better in person or with different speakers.
The Supertramp track is "brighter" on the Accuphase but also more natural, Atoll has less top end treble but a bit of edge/glare in the upper mids which would be tiring. Accuphase has tone controls which could help with the worst recordings without affecting the timbre.
Accuphase is better and accurate sound , but likes Atoll, too.
If a wallet permits it, I buy Accuphase.
Atoll sounds abit dryer. Accuphase more fleshed out, more meat on the bones. Accuphase way more musical...for me:)
Generally, this is the impression we get from the Class A. Thanks for commenting
Atoll showing the truth and Accuphase is on the Marshmallow side of Life (in a good way) would be to much Jelly for Long listening Sessions. I Prefer Atoll, espacially with the A Perfect Circle Song.
Ein Unterschied wie Tag und Nacht, Accuphase holt wesentlich mehr aus dem gleichen Grundmaterial heraus, eine wesentlich weitere Staffelung, ein Mehr an Information in allen Frequenz- und Lebenslagen. Beachtet man den Preisunterschied, ist der Atoll aber ebenfalls eine Versuchung. Nicht zuletzt eine Frage des persönlichen Geschmacks und des Geldbeutels. Zum Schluss muss das Ganze auch noch mit den vorhandenen Schallwandlern harmonieren. Ich würde sagen der Atoll tönt und der Accuphase klingt. 🎶
Atoll is very very good. More bang for your buck..
Atoll is obvious choice
atollの音が好みです。I Prefer Atoll
Obvious. Accuphase so much priced in for their marketing
Atoll, by far the best for my taste
Why compare two devices with such different prices? Accuphase E 280 (or at least the E380) would have been a fairer comparison! second point: One is 2x160W class AB the other one 2x30W class A (8ohms). The result is not a mystery, normally you get better bass control with the AB and a more warm/open medium with the class A, and you must choose the most effective HP for each case (this one have a 30cm boomer). So doing a compair of 2 very différents amps will give a different result if you change HP.
Listening with a Focal Stellia. No difference for me in a blind test, the only worthy one.
So much difference between two pairs of speakers. So few between 2 amplifiers of the same category. So Atoll for those who choose with one ear on the music and one eye on their bank accounts. Accuphase for those who prestige is part of the pleasure.
Atoll has more natural piano sound, in the first song. Also, the bass is meatier ( full bodied ) in the last song. I prefer overall sound picture of Atoll IN 400SE, over the Accuphase E 600.
Atoll wins, the Accuphase is too mushy, so much loss of transient detail by comparison. And this worsens the more dense the music gets, especially the last track.
Atoll
A parte che giudicare dal telefono e' un assurdita: ma sembra che per la differenza di prezzo vince atoll. Io ho un lettore atoll e suona da dio. Con ampli yba integre'. Diffusori sonus faber minima amator.
En la descripción pone que está grabado con una Tascam DR 40X. Saludos
Sound exactly the same. Buy the Accuphase if you want to floss, the other if you’re practical.
Accuphase eindeutig besser,das hört man dirkt bei Supertramp Song.
7:38 5:29
4:24 2:53
Atoll suena más duro , para gustos .
Atol is better🎉
Atoll french win
The Accuphase sounds twice as good as the Atoll does.
Sounds midfi... Accuphase is all Marketing
I'm with you!
@@borisbobowski628 , Accuphase has no marketing at all :-DD At least in Euope.
@@weizenobstmusli8232 so who is paying for the Reviews?
@@borisbobowski628 , who pays for reviews? And Accuphase has very few.
1st song accupphase wins 2nd song non plays well 3rd song atoll wins.
In general atoll dry, distant and cold.
Bad recording !.🤕
Wybrałbym Atola. Ale ani jeden ani drugi nie jest wart tych pieniędzy, które trzeba za nie zapłacić. W tych pieniądzach kupię lepszy wzmacniacz i wystarczy mi na rok na płyty.
какой?
Which one?