The Cosmic Illusion No One Talks About

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 июл 2024
  • Visit brilliant.org/ScienceAsylum/ to get started for free and get 20% off your annual subscription.
    At about 9.6 billion light years, our intuition about angular diameter breaks down. Galaxies start getting larger the more distant they are. Let's find out why.
    Nick Lucid - Host/Writer/Editor/Animator
    Natalie Wells - Researcher
    ________________________________
    VIDEO ANNOTATIONS/CARDS
    The Speed of Light is Infinite... Kind Of:
    • The Speed of Light is ...
    Most Galaxies are Moving Faster than Light!
    • Most Galaxies are Movi...
    ________________________________
    SUPPORT THE SCIENCE ASYLUM
    Patreon:
    / scienceasylum
    RUclips Membership:
    / @scienceasylum
    Advanced Theoretical Physics (Paperback):
    www.lulu.com/shop/nick-lucid/a...
    Advanced Theoretical Physics (eBook):
    gumroad.com/l/ubSc
    Merchandise:
    shop.spreadshirt.com/scienceas...
    ________________________________
    HUGE THANK YOU TO THESE SUPPORTERS
    Asylum Counselors:
    James Younger DDS
    Asylum Orderlies:
    Dhruv Singhal, Medec Hurtz
    Einsteinium Crazies:
    Benjamin Sharef, Blank NA, Bosphorus, Eoin O'Sullivan, Ilya Yashin, Jonathan Lima, Joseph Salomone, Kevin Flanagan, OnlineBookClub, Sean K
    Plutonium Crazies:
    Al Davis, Compuart, Ellis Hall, Fabio Manzini, Kevin MacLean, Rick Myers, Vid Icarus
    Platinum Crazies:
    Bart Barry, Clayton Bruckert, David Johnston, Jon Adams, Jonas Wepeel, Jonathan Reel, Joshua Gallagher, Marino Hernandez, Mikayla Eckel Cifrese, Mr. Orn Jonasar, Olga Cooperman, William Hutchison
    ________________________________
    OTHER SOURCES
    people.ast.cam.ac.uk/~pettini...
    doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2019-0257
    arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9905116
    www.astro.umd.edu/~miller/tea...
    doi.org/10.1142/S021827180000...
    www.physics.unlv.edu/~jeffery...
    ________________________________
    LINKS TO COMMENTS
    • Quantum Teleportation ...
    • Quantum Teleportation ...
    • Quantum Teleportation ...
    ________________________________
    IMAGE CREDITS
    JWST Deep Field:
    webbtelescope.org/contents/me...
    ________________________________
    TIME CODES
    00:00 Cold Open
    00:28 What is Angular Diameter?
    01:56 Angular Diameter Turnaround
    02:52 Finite Speed of Light
    04:07 Time is a Major Factor
    06:02 Space is Expanding
    07:48 Cosmic Light Cone
    08:21 Summary
    09:09 Sponsor Message
    10:07 Outro
    10:26 Featured Comment

Комментарии • 1,6 тыс.

  • @Hobo_X
    @Hobo_X Год назад +247

    Wow, I'd consider myself a long time cosmology and astrophysics casual-learner and I've never actually known this was a thing - you're right that no one talks about it. It's always fascinating to learn something entirely new

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +42

      I'm not sure why barely anyone talks about this. Maybe because the information can't be used to solve any problems cosmologists are facing, so they see it as unimportant? I don't know.

    • @extremawesomazing
      @extremawesomazing Год назад +5

      Makes me wonder whether the CMBR that we detect is actually ultra-zoomed-in relative to nearby galaxies. Could that be true? What might we see instead if the CMBR weren't so zoomed-in?

    • @dwpetrak
      @dwpetrak Год назад +12

      @@ScienceAsylum I agree, topics that don't seem to address current issues or popular topics don't get much funding an any field. I quit studying particle physics when it became apparent I would be chasing grants for the rest of my life. I joined the dark side and became an engineer instead!

    • @eswing2153
      @eswing2153 Год назад +5

      And he did a fantastic job teaching it. It’s the first time I’ve heard of this.

    • @threewheeler7
      @threewheeler7 Год назад +3

      @@ScienceAsylum It kind of sounds like you were saying it's not seen as having a practical application. Coming from someone who doesn't really understand the application of cosmology, isn't it all about understanding how the universe works, (or worked rather 😉)? Is this something that you have to get an intuition for as a cosmologist so maybe it doesn't get talked about because it feels intuitive?

  • @rohitraghunathan
    @rohitraghunathan Год назад +459

    It's been a while since a video blew my mind without giving me a migraine. Thanks Nick.

    • @z0nx
      @z0nx Год назад +7

      Insanely helpful visualizations. I'm trying to wiggle my fingers so hard right now.

    • @Amuzic
      @Amuzic Год назад +4

      I was about to write the exact same thing word by word(may be not the migraine).

    • @dvoiceotruth
      @dvoiceotruth Год назад +1

      you didn't tell about the taj mahal

    • @Toefuy
      @Toefuy Год назад +2

      I’m using this video to brain wash the people I love 💗

    • @lucbloom
      @lucbloom Год назад +2

      Spot on review

  • @eigenchris
    @eigenchris Год назад +187

    Great video. I've learned some cosmology, but I never considered this effect before. The spacetime diagrams are especially helpful.

    • @peterburgess9735
      @peterburgess9735 Год назад +6

      Same... I didn't see that twist coming! So now I'm wondering, how far away was the CMB light when it was emitted?

    • @nate5land
      @nate5land Год назад +3

      It was everywhere, including here.

    • @peterburgess9735
      @peterburgess9735 Год назад +3

      @@nate5land No I mean the light reaching us today

    • @X22GJP
      @X22GJP Год назад +3

      When you don't know that you don't know, of course you never considered it.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +13

      @@peterburgess9735 The plasma that emitted the CMB we're currently receiving today? It was (roughly) 40 _million_ lightyears away when it emitted that CMB. What that plasma ultimately became (i.e. a bunch of distant galaxies) is now 46.5 _billion_ lightyears away. However, the CMB itself has only traveled 13.8 _billion_ lightyears since it was emitted. Expanding space is weird.

  • @OmateYayami
    @OmateYayami Год назад +61

    The comments really show you hit the nail on the head with the topic choice. I've never heard or seen about this effect while it's mind bending. No other Phys channel i follow mentioned it. The amount of comments sharing the same sentiment just show how underrated this effect is. Kudos. And super big props for openly admitting all the shortcuts and omissions. Chapeau bas dear sir.

  • @impostered_human
    @impostered_human Год назад +222

    Its a Light Drop

    • @gistasbanaitis473
      @gistasbanaitis473 Год назад +7

      Nice one nice one

    • @shoam2103
      @shoam2103 Год назад +9

      Light tear? Light teardrop?

    • @gistasbanaitis473
      @gistasbanaitis473 Год назад

      @@shoam2103 yep

    • @weakw1ll
      @weakw1ll Год назад

      Light to decent drop

    • @beingandtime
      @beingandtime Год назад +2

      Regardless of the name, we can all agree that it’s a “tear” in the space-time continuum.

  • @Culando
    @Culando Год назад +133

    Looks like a Light "Teardrop" to me. And dang. Space gets weirder and more confusing the more I learn about it. It hurts my brain. In a good way. There's so many cases where we taking 'seeing' for granted. Both in distant space and the quantum level.
    Thanks for all the great content!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +24

      Yeah, there's a lot of "figuring out" to do after we get cosmological data before we can actually make sense of it.

    • @omwalia4475
      @omwalia4475 Год назад +3

      @@ScienceAsylum when is your next video coming .

    • @SimonBrisbane
      @SimonBrisbane Год назад +3

      What I was thinking too - 100% a teardrop shape

    • @besotoxicomusic
      @besotoxicomusic Год назад +7

      @@omwalia4475 he just released this one. Be patient.

    • @dimitrispapadimitriou5622
      @dimitrispapadimitriou5622 Год назад +2

      We can make it look like a normal past light cone, though, if we use , instead, a conformal spacetime diagram.

  • @jake_
    @jake_ Год назад +29

    Usually, when something blows my mind, it takes some time and further researching to understand it. Somehow, you managed to blow my mind and make me understand the issue at the same time.. Kudos.

  • @hubertheiser
    @hubertheiser Год назад +58

    Even though I'm interested in astronomy an cosmology since decades I learned something astounding today. Thank you Nick!

    • @marcuspradas1037
      @marcuspradas1037 Год назад +1

      Me too

    • @tonytor5346
      @tonytor5346 Год назад

      Please explain why spiral mirrors when used with a radiometer, allows us to observe Alcione in the Pleiades where it is currently compared with observation of light. This has been published in a couple of abstracts. What is special about a spiral mirror? Do they detect tachyons?
      That appears to be a plausible explanation. What are your thoughts?

  • @lululemon0424
    @lululemon0424 Год назад +120

    Even though I know all these concepts and how it works basically, it still amazes me that even observing a single image has all these many factors impacting it.
    Still, there is always some great content from this channel. Thumbs up.

  • @Victor76661
    @Victor76661 Год назад +15

    Amazing work, as always! As for the shape, in Brazil we have a chicken snack called "coxinha", which is fried. It has a potatoey carb, and ground chicken breast.
    It is delicious. Be sure to have one if you ever spend vacations here hahah

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +8

      I've been hearing this. The resemblance is uncanny! Even my digital texture matches 😮

  • @Vino3437
    @Vino3437 Год назад +9

    These days it’s not perceived as special anymore to access science channels like this when being able to watch 100 of channels that are competing with each other. But I’m
    amazed by your way of presenting and explaining topics like this. Completely free and without self promoting. Thank you.

  • @oOHiggsFieldOo
    @oOHiggsFieldOo Год назад +19

    I've never heard of that and trust me, i watch tons of content in cosmology and physics.
    You did a very good job at explaining it, this channel really shines on many levels.
    all my respect!

  • @SomeshwarShegar
    @SomeshwarShegar Год назад +31

    I just love the way u explain anything using spacetime Diagram ❤️
    It's Super Useful to understand counterintuitive things intuitively

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +9

      I don't know how anyone understands anything in relativity (or QFT) without a spacetime diagram.

    • @misterlau5246
      @misterlau5246 Год назад +1

      Oh Lucid... QFT, the cool part is couplings and the deltas, the transients and renormalisation so no infinity 😈🖖

    • @localverse
      @localverse Год назад

      @@ScienceAsylum wow had no idea that QFT uses spacetime diagrams, would love to see that in s video!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +1

      @@localverse Yep! Feynman diagrams are (secretly) spacetime diagrams.

  • @kingatheist7231
    @kingatheist7231 Год назад +11

    I love how almost every video I watch of yours I think, "oh no I'm not going to understand this" and somehow you explain it so that I do. I haven't been notified of your videos in a while so I need to keep a lookout.

  • @VictorJD
    @VictorJD Год назад +16

    I would call it a teardrop shape. I knew about the lightcone and that early expansion was faster than lightspeed but I had never put the two concepts together before to get this turnabout point. The universe gets weirder every day.

    • @SolidSiren
      @SolidSiren Год назад

      Same

    • @soaringeagle5418
      @soaringeagle5418 Год назад

      Its called an ogive. In architecture its known as a gothic arch.

    • @SolidSiren
      @SolidSiren Год назад

      @@soaringeagle5418 nah that shape shown is very different from an ogive. It's a teardrop.

    • @soaringeagle5418
      @soaringeagle5418 Год назад

      @@SolidSiren By definition teardrop shape is an ogive.

  • @markzambelli
    @markzambelli Год назад +2

    Wow...thanks Nick.
    The thing that made it click for me was realising that at 8:51 the overly-large past galaxies at the bottom of the 'teardrop' were closer, on the horizontal axis, to the vertical line running up the centre with the Earth on it... and it makes me smile realising that for the bottom 2/3rds of that light'cone' the Earth doesn't even exist yet and I sub-in the term 'closer to the _Milky way'_ rather than 'closer to _us'_ .
    Brilliant explanation, thanks again.

  • @nbooth
    @nbooth Год назад +6

    You gave enough clues at the beginning that I figured out it's because of expansion by 3:30. I definitely didn't expect the effect to be big enough to make distant galaxies appear to be the same size as close ones. Amazing. Thank you!

  • @deanfehribach
    @deanfehribach Год назад +12

    Mind=blown. Great video, Nick. I haven't enjoyed my mind getting stretched so well since I took quantum physics 30 years ago. Thanks for the wonderful work.

  • @gthakur17
    @gthakur17 Год назад +30

    Wow just wow. Never knew this was a problem. But the way you explained it with one small digestible fact at a time to bring it all together was really amazing 👏

  • @the_one_eyed_man_is_cursed
    @the_one_eyed_man_is_cursed Год назад +3

    Not an easy concept to explain - really well done, Mr Lucid.
    I've never heard of this angular diameter effect before, so you not only introduced a new detail (to me) but I understood the 'why' of it in less than eleven minutes! Kudos.

  • @elejelly3986
    @elejelly3986 Год назад +4

    XKCD did a comic about this effect, and I'm glad that finally someone on YT talks about it.

  • @joeteichert6821
    @joeteichert6821 Год назад +6

    So if I understand earth's past light teardrop correctly, the reason distant equal-sized objects appear larger the more distant they are from us is this: we're seeing them when they were closer, and closer objects appear larger. And we may not be able to see the most distant objects for the same reason we can't see our own galaxy: we are (were?) inside them! And the big bang happened right here, a long time ago. Pretty cool stuff!

  • @HyperFocusMarshmallow
    @HyperFocusMarshmallow Год назад +2

    Great video! I’ve read papers on this but your clear way of explaining makes it very vivid and simple! Great work as always!

  • @CJ-111
    @CJ-111 Год назад +1

    Taken something I never knew anything about and helped me understand everything I need to know for a basic grasp on it. Well done on this.

  • @rev68
    @rev68 Год назад +8

    “Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.”
    ― Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

    • @johnbennett1465
      @johnbennett1465 Год назад +2

      I assume you saw the Hitchhiker image in the background when he referenced this. 🙂

    • @rev68
      @rev68 Год назад +1

      @@johnbennett1465 I was actually just listening mostly as I was doing other things, but any time I hear the words space and big, I automatically think HHGTTG.

  • @Teufeltusken
    @Teufeltusken Год назад +4

    I've followed cosmology as an amateur for 40 years. All the pieces you put together such as light-cones and expanding universe, I'm familiar with those. This particular implication, based on how these things work together? This is new to me. Thank you!

  • @boriskourt
    @boriskourt Год назад +1

    I like this, and its very well delivered. And I definitely didn't think about this before! Its really nice to hit on topics that feel fresh!

  • @adityachk2002
    @adityachk2002 Год назад +2

    Been a watcher for so many years still learn something new regularly

  • @shama_k2604
    @shama_k2604 Год назад +3

    It's been quite some time since an educational video literally blew my mind🤯 your explanation is sooo good I mean you clearly connected the dots by mentioning each point one after the other...

  • @ajhokie130
    @ajhokie130 Год назад +34

    Awesome! Thank you! I had often tried to think of how light was affected from an expanding early universe. I knew it wouldn't be straight forward, but I could never really visualize it. (Of course I never tried to, you know, actually research it either. ) This was a great visualization.

    • @GrandKai9
      @GrandKai9 Год назад

      Yes, however, why hasn't Orion's belt become fatter? Also, why where they able to use stars to navigate for thousands of years. That's thousands of light years, this should have made that impossible if space is expanding at such a rapid pace. This video gives me more questions than answers, sorry that I choose you to ask, but care to take a stab?

    • @numbersix8919
      @numbersix8919 Год назад +1

      @@GrandKai9 If you don't mind my butting in, all the stars we can see are in our region of our galaxy, the Milky Way, and the stars in our galaxy will never recede from us. Also, none of the galaxies in our galactic cluster, the Local Cluster will ever recede from us due to cosmological expansion.
      The stars do move in their individual orbits around the center of the Milky Way, but so slowly (in angular dimension) that it takes thousands of years for the constellations (like the Big Dipper) to change their shapes.

    • @GrandKai9
      @GrandKai9 Год назад

      @@numbersix8919 Thank you so much for your input, I was honestly just looking for anyone to explain, because I knew I was wrong somewhere and didn't even know where to begin to look into it.
      However, from your answer, I have another question, and if you don't mind me asking. wouldn't the consultations only change as we enter into the accelerated orbit of the center of our galaxy? What I mean is we will be accelerated and tossed to the other side of a very large black hole, in theory, so wouldn't the light that we see instantly be affected? I mean we orbit every 200 to 350 million years, but I would have to assume that would hugely affect our view of the cosmos.

    • @KuK137
      @KuK137 Год назад +1

      @@numbersix8919 Technically they will recede away eventually, but it will take a really long time. Much longer than universe has existed so far. Scientists are now debating if the recession will eventually mean the Earth will be alone in dead, black space or its forces will overcome even that (big rip) and individual atoms will be all that is left...

    • @KuK137
      @KuK137 Год назад +1

      @@GrandKai9 And to answer your question, thousands of LY is nothing on the scale of expansion. It is 'rapid' when measured on a scale of millions to billions of LY, trying to measure it to Orion's Belt would be like you checking if your cup of tea moved away from you by 0.0001 millimeter.

  • @Shirsh
    @Shirsh Год назад +2

    I am an astrophysics student. My mind blew off when I first came across this. I immediately thought that if I'm getting this right, how come I haven't heard anyone talk about it. You put a very apt title to the video. Good job. 🌹

  • @SimplyDudeFace
    @SimplyDudeFace Год назад +2

    I followed the idea, that space is dragging light along with it and that produces the tear drop shape and the fact that really distant objects start to look bigger.
    But I missed on the geometry. Why does the tear drop shape the galaxies to look bigger? I could use another diagram showing the size increase.

  • @jonathandawson3091
    @jonathandawson3091 Год назад +3

    Really nice video! It's amazing how much I learn from you. And now I'll wait for Veritasium to remake this with half as much understanding, some experiment gimmick and more arrogance without crediting you.

  • @josebarria3233
    @josebarria3233 Год назад +6

    Finally someone made a video about this topic that has been on my head since I took extragalactic astronomy 3 years ago.
    Nice!

  • @xDR1TeK
    @xDR1TeK Год назад +1

    Jaw dropping as usual. Why would anyone not share this so often today? It's relevant in every way. Thanks man.

  • @woofowl2408
    @woofowl2408 Год назад +1

    "Images of the distant past filled with illusions of cosmic proportion." A beautiful summary for a great video, this one felt as profound to me as your circuit energy video (among others).

  • @jbtownsend9535
    @jbtownsend9535 Год назад +3

    I’ve been thinking and wondering about these phenomena very recently and the explanations herein have begun to satiate my curiosity, and for that I thank you.

  • @KeithCooper-Albuquerque
    @KeithCooper-Albuquerque Год назад +3

    Great job, Nick! I learn so much from you!

  • @insta_visor3846
    @insta_visor3846 Год назад +2

    Hey Nick, I just discovered your channel and I watched all of your 100+ videos (a little crazy, but now I know that's ok). Thank you for explaining complicated problems in simple terms and for all the simulations you make, they help a lot. Until now I didn't really understand how we could observe galaxies as they were billions of years ago. And I learned more than that, great job! I hope one day you get to use metric units in your everyday life, though my American friends think it's too late now. Good luck to you and all your clones ;)

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад

      Thanks! Glad you like my work. I would _love_ to switch to metric here, but I don't think it'll ever happen.

  • @user-lc8yc4cq5n
    @user-lc8yc4cq5n Год назад

    The title says it all. Thanks for making it visually easy to grasp.
    And without referring to that non-luminiferous, I mean, dark something or rather.

  • @honesthammer8737
    @honesthammer8737 Год назад +8

    Fantastic video, it made my Saturday! Your channel helped inspire me to peruse a physics degree, so thank you for all the incredible content and showing me to the subject which I enjoy more than any other

  • @ParadoxProblems
    @ParadoxProblems Год назад +3

    Nice! You often hear about redshift but very rarely about how the expansion of the universe effects light as its traveling.

  • @greatPretender79
    @greatPretender79 Год назад +2

    Good one, I really learned something today that I never would have thought of before, but it makes perfect sense! Thanks again, Nick!

  • @slimyduck2140
    @slimyduck2140 Год назад +1

    I love this video so much much, not only because it's amazing but also because all concept talked about in it (like light cones, the expansion of space faster than light, ) I already knew about but they all ties in each other to form something I had no idea about. And that's so cool to me

  • @jonathanspruance4502
    @jonathanspruance4502 Год назад +4

    I love this channel - super informative and great sense of humor : D

  • @oisnowy5368
    @oisnowy5368 Год назад +3

    This is by far one of the greatest science video's on RUclips. Some people might think observing is just looking. But what do you really see?

  • @agentdarkboote
    @agentdarkboote Год назад +1

    I wish this had been longer and more in depth! This is fascinating. Really, not many people talk about this, I've never heard it mentioned!

  • @petslittleworld
    @petslittleworld Год назад +2

    That was an awesome video and as always 'Lucidly' explained, Thanks Nick!!🙂

  • @seanspartan2023
    @seanspartan2023 Год назад +7

    And I thought the different horizons were complicated. My mind is officially blown 🤯

  • @hikingpete
    @hikingpete Год назад +3

    I'd heard of this, but never believed it. Thanks for the clear and thorough explanation.

  • @josephsalomone
    @josephsalomone Год назад +1

    I do appreciate how this video explains why we think the universe is expanding, more than just waving around redshift as the cause.

  • @seanmccaul3034
    @seanmccaul3034 8 месяцев назад +1

    Man, this was great! It brought together a lot of ideas I understand, or thought I did, in a way that puts all of the puzzle pieces together! Impressive!

  • @leonlee8524
    @leonlee8524 Год назад +3

    I used to always ponder about how energy is Mass and now I ponder about the role time plays and how wave-like matter can be, I saw an image of a rock that had been weathered by the wind over centuries or more and the image made it seem as if the Wind and The Rock where a still photo of fluid dynamics at play. I don't know what this means, but videos like yours help me pursue it even more and discover even more fun insights so thank you. I never went to college and this is what I've always wanted to check out 🙌🏿🙏🏿😄

    • @leonlee8524
      @leonlee8524 Год назад

      Shout out to text to speech for reminding me that "The Rock" is a force of nature as well*

    • @christinebeames712
      @christinebeames712 Год назад +1

      Hi have a look at Jon Levi on YTUBE , there are two , this one shows pics of old rocks buildings etc m unmissable ,will have you questioning our give history timelines,

  • @fep_ptcp883
    @fep_ptcp883 Год назад +3

    7:54 if you were Brazilian you would know EXACTLY what to call that shape: that is an unmistakable COXINHA. Even the color is spot-on

  • @creaturalshade7054
    @creaturalshade7054 Год назад +1

    This is pretty incredible. It's something I never thought about, still don't completely understand, but also somehow makes sense in light of this explanation.
    Cool video. 🤘

  • @rogerrabbit3200
    @rogerrabbit3200 Год назад +1

    Great episode. Definitely need to watch it again in order to be able to tell someone else about it.

  • @TheHumanHades
    @TheHumanHades Год назад +5

    I had seen this "cone/Taj Mahal" diagram before but today I understood it 😁.

    • @RedRocket4000
      @RedRocket4000 Год назад

      They doing some great math work to build that illusion into the Taj Mahal by making the minarets (the outside structures) at a angle so they appear to go straight up at a distance. I assume people had noticed the towers seaming to lean at a distance in other structures before this.

  • @kasroa
    @kasroa Год назад +4

    I like videos like this that explain how we solve problems that seem impossible to solve. Also, on the subject of judging distance, humans also use our binocular vision which can be tricked with things like magic eye pictures.

  • @XEinstein
    @XEinstein Год назад +2

    3:25 loved the Adam Douglas Easter egg!

  • @savagesarethebest7251
    @savagesarethebest7251 Год назад +1

    I guessed this was the case as soon as I heard that galaxies get bigger the further they are after a certain distance. Good video. Have never thought of this before.

  • @chrisbecke2793
    @chrisbecke2793 Год назад +7

    If we could see all the way to the Big Bang, there would be a single dot that fills the entire sky. That always freaked me out. Love this video. First time I've ever seen this unintuitive result addressed.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад

      *"...there would be a single dot that fills the entire sky. "*
      I've never thought about it that way 😱

    • @rockets4kids
      @rockets4kids Год назад

      That single dot is cosmic microwave background.

    • @chrisbecke2793
      @chrisbecke2793 Год назад

      @@rockets4kids Nah, that's hundreds of millions of years in front of a potential singularity point that's stretched all around.

  • @CamiloSanchez1979
    @CamiloSanchez1979 Год назад +6

    Awesome video Nick, it reminds me more of your videos from earlier times. Please make a video on quantum locality and the Nobel prize for 2022. PBS made a video as well but maybe you can dumb it down for us a bit.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +2

      As I was editing this, I was feeling the same way. It felt a bit like the olden days.
      As for the Nobel, I made a video about entanglement earlier this year: ruclips.net/video/hiyKxhETXd8/видео.html I don't think I have any more to say about it at the moment.

    • @CamiloSanchez1979
      @CamiloSanchez1979 Год назад +1

      @@ScienceAsylum Sir, thank you Sir!

  • @ss_avsmt
    @ss_avsmt Год назад +1

    Wow, this is the most interesting thing I learnt that I have never ever seen or heard in any space documentary or even a youtube astrophysics channel video. Amazing.

  • @OmniGuy
    @OmniGuy Год назад +1

    I love how you teach me things I didn't even know I wanted to learn.

  • @macronencer
    @macronencer Год назад +3

    My mind is officially blown. You're dead right that no-one talks about this! I've been following science as a lay person for decades, and this is the first time I've heard of the phenomenon.

  • @aqa5794
    @aqa5794 Год назад +4

    welcome back bro - happy to see your new video .. always a delight 😇😇😇 .. Love from India (BTW maybe second or third or fourth - missed by a Pico second 🤣 or it took a diagonal path for ur video to reach india -D~universal~delay)

  • @robertomainetti4434
    @robertomainetti4434 Год назад +1

    It's amazing the way you can explain such a complicated matter so easily

  • @ChrisWalshZX
    @ChrisWalshZX Год назад +1

    You've done it again Nick! Mind blown by something I've not come across before! Well done 😊

  • @shelley-anneharrisberg7409
    @shelley-anneharrisberg7409 Год назад +9

    Super video - although I've attended some basic cosmology courses, I didn't actually know about the angular diameter turnaround. Makes sense though - especially from the clear way you explain it!

  • @MrPooPooJohn
    @MrPooPooJohn Год назад +5

    This was PERFECTLY explained. These visuals and graphs were amazing. And I would call the past light cone The Past Lemongrab cone.

  • @vrgamestudio294
    @vrgamestudio294 Год назад +2

    Fascinating! I never seem to learn anything new from videos about the cosmos, but in this case I did and whats so interesting is that not only was this phenomena unknown to me it represents a tangible proof of the big bang itself, you're actually looking at evidence of it. Well done indeed, a really great video, thank you!

  • @MostlyIC
    @MostlyIC Год назад +1

    Awesome !!!, I thought I was reasonably educated but this was totally new to me, I really like learning new stuff, many thanks.

  • @pedroff_1
    @pedroff_1 Год назад +5

    That shape resembles quite a lot the Brazilian snack "coxinha" (which means "little thigh" as it supposedly was meant to resemble a chicken drumstick). Thus, I name it, the time coxinha!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +3

      Oh wow! The resemblance is uncanny! Even my digital texture matches 😮

    • @rlaranjo
      @rlaranjo Год назад +1

      @@ScienceAsylum IT'S A COXINHA!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @VictorD264
      @VictorD264 Год назад +1

      I'm brazilian and I was searching for this comment. The shape made me remember a coxinha too lol.

  • @pjaworek6793
    @pjaworek6793 Год назад +3

    Angular Diameter Turnaround Point. That does blow my mind, literally. Why isn't this plastered all over cosmology discourse? I feel like I've been imagining the universe wrong until now where every object fades in optical diameter as it recedes into the distance. Everything starts to come closer, that is crazy,!! Thank you for sharing this and all the great new-to-me terms. I think it's a huge thing to know.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +1

      🤷‍♂️ I'm not sure why barely anyone talks about this. Maybe because the information can't be used to solve any problems cosmologists are facing, so they see it as unimportant? I don't know.

  • @extremawesomazing
    @extremawesomazing Год назад +1

    Amazing. Visuals and explanations are on point!. Thank you.

  • @rosieroti4063
    @rosieroti4063 Год назад +2

    This is something I didn't know that I didn't know and didn't know that I would love so much!
    Thanks again Nick👍

  • @feynstein1004
    @feynstein1004 Год назад +3

    Ah yes. Another quirk of living in a 4D universe.

  • @NoNameAtAll2
    @NoNameAtAll2 Год назад +4

    oh yeah, there's xkcd comic about that!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +1

      Yep... and that XKCD comic was inspired by a Twitter post from Katie Mack.

  • @vryusvin3905
    @vryusvin3905 Год назад +1

    Thank you Nick, and thank you Question Clone! Question Clone is awesome. This was an amazingly detailed, but not scary, explanation of an interesting phenomenon!

  • @johnbennett1465
    @johnbennett1465 Год назад +2

    It has always bothered me that no one talks about this issue. Thanks for changing that.

  • @calyodelphi124
    @calyodelphi124 Год назад +3

    Oh wow this is SUCH a cool concept that so many other astrophysics channels haven't even talked about yet!

    • @vast634
      @vast634 Год назад

      True, first time anyone has pointed that out. Nick often picks up science-ed topics first.

  • @EyMannMachHin
    @EyMannMachHin Год назад +4

    I guess the real brainbreaker is realizing that any object (in the loosest sense, particles, waves, etc) can only move a lightspeed, while space is not limited by such constraints. I really love these seemingly ADHD fueled explanation, they just tickle my brain at the right buttons.

    • @LuisAldamiz
      @LuisAldamiz Год назад +1

      Space is also limited by those constraints... locally. It's the cummulative effect of many tiny and relatively slow stretchings of local space which causes the overall space/Universe to expand faster than light.
      That also happens with other peculiar situations like when you (theoretically) point a super laser at the moon and move it around: the (again theoretical) "object" (reflection) that your laser makes on the Moon's surface can perfectly move faster than light... but it's not any real object, it's just an effect.

  • @justbplz
    @justbplz Год назад +2

    You did great job explaining, the last diagram showing the tear drop shape still showed the red shift, that helped visualize the concept of what you were describing

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +1

      Thanks for letting me know. Attention to detail (like the redshift) is important to me. It's nice to know it's appreciated.

  • @maximiliansousa4299
    @maximiliansousa4299 Год назад +1

    Very funny and instrutive. It's top. Thanks for the humor and to make the complex easier to understand.

  • @mattkerle81
    @mattkerle81 Год назад +1

    The angular turnaround is the most incredible thing I never knew before watching this video! Thanks!

  • @MrMineHeads.
    @MrMineHeads. Год назад +1

    That last part is truly amazing. Thanks so much for this video!

  • @VeganAncientDragonKnight
    @VeganAncientDragonKnight Год назад +2

    This kind of videos is really a life saver! Thank you!

  • @justaguy4real
    @justaguy4real Год назад +1

    7:37 i love the concept of island universes. Being galaxies are exponentially farther apart than star systems within them, that's a mindboggler.

  • @haloboy777
    @haloboy777 Год назад +1

    This video is so great!
    explained me a totally new concept with such elegance
    I love it!

  • @CDXLIV444
    @CDXLIV444 Год назад +2

    This is crazy! I was totally unaware of this effect. Thank you!

  • @Ceffeer
    @Ceffeer Год назад +1

    This was awesome as alwwys. This really blew my mind! Keep up the good work

  • @SolidSiren
    @SolidSiren Год назад +1

    I have never heard of or considered this! Cool video, thank you.

  • @stricklst
    @stricklst Год назад +1

    This was very good! First time i’ve ever heard of it - thanks!

  • @ddmarty
    @ddmarty Год назад

    I never thought of this. Amazing. Thanks for explaining it in a way I can understand. Who knew.

  • @dugger0
    @dugger0 Год назад +1

    Cool video. Your explanations are always my favorite

  • @STho205
    @STho205 Год назад +1

    Nicely presented.
    Good instructive and relatable graphics

  • @tommylakindasorta3068
    @tommylakindasorta3068 Год назад +2

    This is one of my favorite episodes so far. I had to watch it twice.

  • @jamesdonaghy9143
    @jamesdonaghy9143 Год назад +1

    It's a tear drop.
    The science asylum is so sad, but its the only place where i feel safe.

  • @jordanpond3312
    @jordanpond3312 Год назад +1

    this is an incredible thing to learn about, thanks for sharing!

  • @Konchok_Dawa
    @Konchok_Dawa Год назад +1

    Omg this totally clears up something i've thought about! I never quite knew how to put it into words, but the universe we see as we look out is a skewed version that only we can see, like we dont see *the* universe as it is *now* we're seeing images based on our perspective

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад

      Yeah, there's a lot of "figuring out" to do after we get cosmological data before we can actually make sense of it. Thankfully, cosmologists have that under control 👍