Boy,, I want one of those energy storage yards taking up about 5sq miles of my city and in every city. Bet that nice to look at and drive around all day.
The best way to use the present solar panels. Would be proof tops of houses and buildings, maybe on sides. Where that space is dead space. It's not real being used and it wouldn't take up other space that could be used for a better use. Remember thier talking about taking up vast land area.
Once we received our past utility charge we could not place dinner on the family table. I recognized my toddlers would most likely go hungry. The solution turned out to be the Papziati Energy system online. It is a good way to produce your own electricity. Just start looking on the search engines.
Renewable and sustainable means using and recycling the more abundant materials not wasting, hording, and fighting over the least abundant rarest earth metals. This road will end up in the next war being over rare energy.
The biggest issue with deploying an updated energy grid with fully renewable energy generation seems to be that people are struggling to come up with ways to make money off it? So why exactly do we need the monetary system? It seems to hold back progress in many sectors, not just energy... #ChangeTheGame
@Jacob Dykstra cheapest = less profitable. less profitable = slowing of the economy. slowing of the economy leads to monetary system collapse. If we were 100% renewable, energy companies wouldn't be able to justify the ridiculous prices they charge. At the rate that renewable energy technology is getting more efficient and cheaper we'd be able to produce energy at near zero marginal cost once the initial infrastructure costs are met. This initial cost is where everyone seems to throw their hands up and say too expensive. If there was no monetary system this excuse would be removed.
blowera1 we don't need energy companies to keep the economy alive there are many other businesses and opportunities such as the clean energy. Solar employs more people than fossil energy. There will still always be a need to remain connected to the grid and move power around. I would argue it will help the economy by shifting money elsewhere allowing people to do something more productive than constantly search for oil and gas.
We don't need the "economy" in its current form. While oil and gas are near the top of the food chain, in relation to biggest industries on the planet, they will slow down the transition to renewables while they cling to their final breath. That's just the kind of mentality the monetary system breeds. Building a new digital energy grid, turning houses and other buildings into their own independent power supply and building storage and backup generation facilities would create an enormous amount of jobs and stimulate the economy but would effect the bottom line of some of the biggest corporations on the planet. The kinds of corporations with the power to influence governments.
I like the virtue signaling in the beginning. Alienate conservatives like me because we all know political affiliation is far more important than green energy adoption.
27:10 2 MW for 0.25 hours
27:40 10 MW for 0.25 hours
28:12 32 MW for ???? hours
28:59 30 MW for 4.0 hours
0.40 hectares
30:50 100 MW for 4.0 hours
31:51 2 MW for ???? hours
33:07 20 MW for ???? hours
I prefer to be informed of the storage capacity as well as the peak discharge rate in all cases.
Boy,, I want one of those energy storage yards taking up about 5sq miles of my city and in every city. Bet that nice to look at and drive around all day.
MIT's salt cooled reactor reach is our country best path. Hands down, obvious. Those MIT people are genius's.
The best way to use the present solar panels. Would be proof tops of houses and buildings, maybe on sides. Where that space is dead space. It's not real being used and it wouldn't take up other space that could be used for a better use. Remember thier talking about taking up vast land area.
Panels would protect the roof shingles and contents of the attic from large amounts of heat, as well as the heat which migrates down to the top floor.
Once we received our past utility charge we could not place dinner on the family table. I recognized my toddlers would most likely go hungry. The solution turned out to be the Papziati Energy system online. It is a good way to produce your own electricity. Just start looking on the search engines.
Storage is the only solution. When that is the question. The answer is now. Joseph France
That tape MIT developed for SALT reactor. Can that be made to carry the currents on the grids more efficiently????? MIT....
Renewable and sustainable means using and recycling the more abundant materials not wasting, hording, and fighting over the least abundant rarest earth metals. This road will end up in the next war being over rare energy.
how much is the TESLA Powerpact? or any utility scale BESS?
Pricing must be top-secret proprietary information because nobody ever mentions it.
Is that Dr. Falchi on far left...lol....sorry I can't help myself.
Is that the actor from 3rd Rock...lol...sorry...lol...
What is CAISO?
the California Independent System Operator.
Lee Brennan . Thanks!
Thanks!
The biggest issue with deploying an updated energy grid with fully renewable energy generation seems to be that people are struggling to come up with ways to make money off it? So why exactly do we need the monetary system? It seems to hold back progress in many sectors, not just energy... #ChangeTheGame
blowera1 are you serious? Fully renewable is the cheapest energy available.
@Jacob Dykstra cheapest = less profitable. less profitable = slowing of the economy. slowing of the economy leads to monetary system collapse. If we were 100% renewable, energy companies wouldn't be able to justify the ridiculous prices they charge. At the rate that renewable energy technology is getting more efficient and cheaper we'd be able to produce energy at near zero marginal cost once the initial infrastructure costs are met. This initial cost is where everyone seems to throw their hands up and say too expensive. If there was no monetary system this excuse would be removed.
blowera1 we don't need energy companies to keep the economy alive there are many other businesses and opportunities such as the clean energy. Solar employs more people than fossil energy. There will still always be a need to remain connected to the grid and move power around. I would argue it will help the economy by shifting money elsewhere allowing people to do something more productive than constantly search for oil and gas.
We don't need the "economy" in its current form. While oil and gas are near the top of the food chain, in relation to biggest industries on the planet, they will slow down the transition to renewables while they cling to their final breath. That's just the kind of mentality the monetary system breeds. Building a new digital energy grid, turning houses and other buildings into their own independent power supply and building storage and backup generation facilities would create an enormous amount of jobs and stimulate the economy but would effect the bottom line of some of the biggest corporations on the planet. The kinds of corporations with the power to influence governments.
$400 for anyone that uses or gets someone to use my Tesla/Solar city reference!!
Antonmursid🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💝✌👌👋🙌🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💝✌👌👋🙌
Antonmursid🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💝✌👌👋🙌🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💝✌👌👋🙌
I like the virtue signaling in the beginning. Alienate conservatives like me because we all know political affiliation is far more important than green energy adoption.
Even has a girlfriend named Susan...lol...
people talk with a lot of ummm ahhhhh ummmmm ahhhhh
It’s all in the Brainless lies where the uuuumn and aaaash
Kelly Warner too many "ums"
Try a WG1 climate science talk by Richard Alley, OK ? Try it OK ? OK ? OK ? I'm asking you OK, OK, OK ?