⚓This video is not sponsored. If you want to help me make more videos and gain early access, consider supporting House of History at www.patreon.com/HouseofHistory!
I really enjoy this kind of format, I'm a Map Guy, so this tickles my Jones, Also maybe more important, whoever is responsible for series writing at least has a working knowledge of the subject, a rarity in today's internet
Thanks Steve! Midway is in the works. I'm almost done with the first episode, but I'm playing around with 3D scenes to enhance the documentary - hence the delay. Will be worth it, hopefully!
I like the graphics you use. I find them clear, and you identify ships and if they survive or not. The commenter voice is is clear and excellent pronunciation of Japanese names/ships. Finally the music does not over whelm the commentary. Great story telling.
Not the first Japanese invasion to be thwarted, "Wake Island" the Corral sea battles however highlighted the then unknown Chaos' theory "Butterfly Syndrome", Corral Sea & all events associated were the all important Nexis of all that occurs at Midway
Wonderful introduction... and informative historical coverage video about 5 parts of naval clashed between Japanese navigation fleets and allies navigation fleets in coral sea ...thank you (house of history ) channel for sharing
The reason Crace was detached to sail separately because he was of senior to Fitch and equivalent or above Fletchers rank. The USN (under Admiral King) was determined that no US aircraft carrier would end up in a position where it could be under the command of the RN or RAN or US Army. Crace of senior experience, though not with carrier operations. Crace had been in charge of the Australia Station since late October 1939 but lacked ships because most the RAN was overseas. The only action he had come close to was in following up HMAS Sydney’s sinking in 1941 off WA. Despite being at war for 32 months by this date his only combat experience so far was from WW1. He was keen to press attack upon the enemy and had tried to transfer to get into battle. This may have been seen as too aggressive to be given command of aircraft carriers. The USN considered their carriers as not there to defend Australia, rather they were there to stop the Japanese where they could without unnecessary losses. There was considerable risk taken to detach the carriers from the defence of Hawaii and the US west coast. The US public were overly paranoid of the Japanese attacking California. No one outside the USN would command a USN carrier. Crace was the right man to command a detached cruiser force and had already worked hard to integrate with American ships placed under him so that they could correctly work together. He built a positive working relationship with captain Bode of the USS Chicago who was noted to be very difficult to work with by other USN officers. After Coral Sea Crutchley would replace Crace, who struggled more with Bode. HMAS Canberra replaced HMAS Australia. Communications from there were not as sound with Bode. This factor contributed to the defeat at Savo Island where both ships were sunk that August.
Strange to fathom that Japan with all today's advanced electronics companies, was hampered by the lack of radar and radios. Thanks for this contribution HoH
@louishermann7676 what I'm saying is it was a clown show that both sides learned from. I'll be at the United States more so did the Japanese. Same token. You are right, it was the first carrier on carrier battle so a lot had to be learned. Realistically though this was a battle between a gluttonous and a blind opponent.
@@louishermann7676 Don't get me wrong. I agree with you. If you want another show trial of an educational clown show, look up at the Battle of the Hampton heights or the Battle of the ironclads. Don't get me wrong. A lot of lessons were learned but still a hilarious clown show.
I really appreciate your efforts! Could you help me with something unrelated: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?
An hour and a half-plus? WAY too long IMO. You do great work, and I'm sub'd... but this way too long. And, FYI, I watch most of my youtube vids at 1/5 to 2.0 speed.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
⚓This video is not sponsored. If you want to help me make more videos and gain early access, consider supporting House of History at www.patreon.com/HouseofHistory!
I really enjoy this kind of format, I'm a Map Guy, so this tickles my Jones, Also maybe more important, whoever is responsible for series writing at least has a working knowledge of the subject, a rarity in today's internet
Thank you for the generous support!
Oi! Could you point a fellow cartography ticklin dude to some other tickles? Lol.
@@ForestBlue7 there's a guy named Kyle that has a great channel for map geeks. @Geographyking
OVER AN HOUR OF HOH?! YES PLEASE 🎉🎉🎉🎉
Love that you are making these longer compilation videos so quickly. And looking forward to Midway whenever it's released.
Thanks Steve! Midway is in the works. I'm almost done with the first episode, but I'm playing around with 3D scenes to enhance the documentary - hence the delay. Will be worth it, hopefully!
Best 90 minutes I’ve spent all day long.
Great vid(s) mate.
Always look forward to this channels stuff.
😎👍
Happy saturday! Love your content ❤❤❤
I like the graphics you use. I find them clear, and you identify ships and if they survive or not. The commenter voice is is clear and excellent pronunciation of Japanese names/ships. Finally the music does not over whelm the commentary.
Great story telling.
Glad you enjoy it!
Uh. _Some_ of the Japanese names, that is.
RIP
To the 715 US Navy men and airmen, and 966 Imperial Japanese Navy men and airmen who were killed in the Battle of the Coral Sea
Thanks so much for your work. It's so comprehensive I have to watch it multiple times so as not to pick up every detail.
Thanks!
Excellent! This is history minute by minute. Obviously, extracted from Military history.
Not the first Japanese invasion to be thwarted, "Wake Island" the Corral sea battles however highlighted the then unknown Chaos' theory "Butterfly Syndrome", Corral Sea & all events associated were the all important Nexis of all that occurs at Midway
Best animated historical battles channel ❤❤
Wonderful introduction... and informative historical coverage video about 5 parts of naval clashed between Japanese navigation fleets and allies navigation fleets in coral sea ...thank you (house of history ) channel for sharing
The reason Crace was detached to sail separately because he was of senior to Fitch and equivalent or above Fletchers rank.
The USN (under Admiral King) was determined that no US aircraft carrier would end up in a position where it could be under the command of the RN or RAN or US Army. Crace of senior experience, though not with carrier operations.
Crace had been in charge of the Australia Station since late October 1939 but lacked ships because most the RAN was overseas. The only action he had come close to was in following up HMAS Sydney’s sinking in 1941 off WA.
Despite being at war for 32 months by this date his only combat experience so far was from WW1. He was keen to press attack upon the enemy and had tried to transfer to get into battle.
This may have been seen as too aggressive to be given command of aircraft carriers.
The USN considered their carriers as not there to defend Australia, rather they were there to stop the Japanese where they could without unnecessary losses.
There was considerable risk taken to detach the carriers from the defence of Hawaii and the US west coast. The US public were overly paranoid of the Japanese attacking California. No one outside the USN would command a USN carrier.
Crace was the right man to command a detached cruiser force and had already worked hard to integrate with American ships placed under him so that they could correctly work together. He built a positive working relationship with captain Bode of the USS Chicago who was noted to be very difficult to work with by other USN officers.
After Coral Sea Crutchley would replace Crace, who struggled more with Bode. HMAS Canberra replaced HMAS Australia. Communications from there were not as sound with Bode. This factor contributed to the defeat at Savo Island where both ships were sunk that August.
Thanks for this. Incredibly interesting, while my books were a bit more nuanced and skirting around the topic, the USN reasoning makes sense.
Strange to fathom that Japan with all today's advanced electronics companies, was hampered by the lack of radar and radios.
Thanks for this contribution HoH
They learned their lesson.
Neosho & Sims, never in the history of warfare has so few been Pounded into Ruble by So Many
Sims, under attack: "This curdles my milk run!"
I'm considering doing a detailed 3d animation of the ordeal.
Very well done. Pronounced most of most Japanese terms properly Rabal.
Great videos mate.👍🏻
Great graphics. I am a stroke survivor, and easily confused (!) this made it clear.
Rabaul: rabah-ool.
Miyoko: mee'-oh-koh; no "yoko" in there.
Hosho: hoe'-shoh.
This battle was not exactly what you you would say a show of competence.
Literally the first carrier on carrier action. The US learned a lot more from this fight than our enemies did.
@louishermann7676 what I'm saying is it was a clown show that both sides learned from. I'll be at the United States more so did the Japanese. Same token. You are right, it was the first carrier on carrier battle so a lot had to be learned.
Realistically though this was a battle between a gluttonous and a blind opponent.
@@paulgoodridge2269 my point is that it's very easy to criticize from a position of hindsight.
@@louishermann7676 Don't get me wrong. I agree with you. If you want another show trial of an educational clown show, look up at the Battle of the Hampton heights or the Battle of the ironclads. Don't get me wrong. A lot of lessons were learned but still a hilarious clown show.
@@louishermann7676 just because something is a clown show or not exactly a show of competence. Does it mean it's a good proof of concept.
nice job
Admitalcrace is my grandad, proud of his legacy
Excellent!
I think it was Nimitz who said this battle was determined by the side that out-blundered the other.
I really appreciate your efforts! Could you help me with something unrelated: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?
I've watched many animated WWII engagements at sea now, say, between 1941 and 1945, did any US torpedo ever
1. hit a target and
2. actually go off ?
😅
Love it ❤❤
Long form is best form
KEE-o-HEE-deh SHEE-ma. Not Kee-o-hyde.
👀👍🇮🇪⚓
sub eng plz
Is this narrator human? Or AI?
... I can't believe it has got to the point where I need to ask...
An hour and a half-plus? WAY too long IMO. You do great work, and I'm sub'd... but this way too long. And, FYI, I watch most of my youtube vids at 1/5 to 2.0 speed.
Did you see the 7 hour video