Why don't you do a discrete math too? Do you know poor people only have a poor education that education only makes them fail? Here LACCD has one out of five students that are homeless. Our professor in East Los Angeles Collge does not care about the student. I am done with hearing student describing how terrible their professors are in Linear Algebra, Discrete Math and down to high school math.
We have a number of discrete math courses available. See the list at ocw.mit.edu/courses/find-by-topic/#cat=mathematics&subcat=discretemathematics. Best wishes on your studies! :)
MIT OpenCourseWare has two discrete 6.042J courses. They are 2015 version and 2010 version. The 2010 one is too old. I think the 2015 one is bad. You can see the review on ratemyprofessor. Thus, I highly suggest that MIT open courseware redo a whole new Discrete Math 6.042J again. www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=95063 You can see how everyone talks about the newest version of 6.042J(2015) (I think the new one is just like the professor in old 2010 says, which is proof by powerpoint.) The 2010 version is not just too old. It does not drive deep enough as professor Gilbert Strang does. For example, the 6.042J, 2010 also taught the homogeneous equation with the particular equation in the Fibonacci sequence section(lec. 15). The Professor in the lec. 15 does not really talk about how to solve the particular equation on the right side. The professor in it only tells you, " if Ax doesn't work, try Ax+B. Try it til everything works" On the other hands, we can see Gilbert Strang really talks about how the way of solving the particular equation part work and why Ax does not work in this MIT RES.18-009 course. Two different courses, but both talks about the homogeneous equation and particular equation too. However, Gilbert Strang teaches deeply than 2010 in the concept of the homogeneous equation and particular equation. Therefore, I think the old version 2010 does not really totally focus on detail. The new version 2015 is just terrible. Lec 15 ruclips.net/video/TWBB-JlmYUc/видео.html
I don’t usually reply to rude comments but the world would be a better if we could condemn less and see what others are truly saying before responding. IMHO, Jonathan was making a plea that MIT OpenCourseWare to offer quality materials for the underprivileged students everywhere in the world and his reply provides concrete evidences why the 2010 and 2015 versions are not up to standard. The standard that we expect from MIT instructors (sometimes youtube hides the whole response with … , please reload and see the whole response by Johnathan). Johnathan was not complaining and thus, not ungrateful. He simply made a good point how comes these younger instructors could not even deliver clear teaching to their own students (Doesn’t it make you sad to see that (low quality teaching) also happens at MIT?). Nevertheless, I sympathise with these young instructors who are under much pressure to pump out as much research output as possible and quality teaching is actually a liability. I understand the premise that we often associate “cost” with quality and how we judge something. Nevertheless, the premise doesn’t always hold true. Think about fake news which is free but it may cost your own life while the Gospels is free, too and it can give you eternal life. In the spirit of sharing and honouring quality teaching and learning, there is even less honour by profaning in these Prof. Strang videos.
This is a good introductory for first year electrical engineering students.
Fantastic. Makes me feel extremely lucky to be alive at this time
Hello! Is there a link available for the RLC circuit video mentioned at the end?
Why don't you do a discrete math too? Do you know poor people only have a poor education that education only makes them fail? Here LACCD has one out of five students that are homeless. Our professor in East Los Angeles Collge does not care about the student.
I am done with hearing student describing how terrible their professors are in Linear Algebra, Discrete Math and down to high school math.
We have a number of discrete math courses available. See the list at ocw.mit.edu/courses/find-by-topic/#cat=mathematics&subcat=discretemathematics. Best wishes on your studies! :)
MIT OpenCourseWare has two discrete 6.042J courses. They are 2015 version and 2010 version. The 2010 one is too old. I think the 2015 one is bad. You can see the review on ratemyprofessor. Thus, I highly suggest that MIT open courseware redo a whole new Discrete Math 6.042J again.
www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=95063
You can see how everyone talks about the newest version of 6.042J(2015)
(I think the new one is just like the professor in old 2010 says, which is proof by powerpoint.)
The 2010 version is not just too old. It does not drive deep enough as professor Gilbert Strang does. For example, the 6.042J, 2010 also taught the homogeneous equation with the particular equation in the Fibonacci sequence section(lec. 15). The Professor in the lec. 15 does not really talk about how to solve the particular equation on the right side. The professor in it only tells you, " if Ax doesn't work, try Ax+B. Try it til everything works" On the other hands, we can see Gilbert Strang really talks about how the way of solving the particular equation part work and why Ax does not work in this MIT RES.18-009 course. Two different courses, but both talks about the homogeneous equation and particular equation too. However, Gilbert Strang teaches deeply than 2010 in the concept of the homogeneous equation and particular equation. Therefore, I think the old version 2010 does not really totally focus on detail. The new version 2015 is just terrible.
Lec 15 ruclips.net/video/TWBB-JlmYUc/видео.html
@@jonathansum9084 lol make one yourself, complaining about free material like some kind of king, fuck off m8
@@jonathansum9084 Fuck of you piece of shit. Ungrateful bastard.
I don’t usually reply to rude comments but the world would be a better if we could condemn less and see what others are truly saying before responding. IMHO, Jonathan was making a plea that MIT OpenCourseWare to offer quality materials for the underprivileged students everywhere in the world and his reply provides concrete evidences why the 2010 and 2015 versions are not up to standard. The standard that we expect from MIT instructors (sometimes youtube hides the whole response with … , please reload and see the whole response by Johnathan).
Johnathan was not complaining and thus, not ungrateful. He simply made a good point how comes these younger instructors could not even deliver clear teaching to their own students (Doesn’t it make you sad to see that (low quality teaching) also happens at MIT?). Nevertheless, I sympathise with these young instructors who are under much pressure to pump out as much research output as possible and quality teaching is actually a liability.
I understand the premise that we often associate “cost” with quality and how we judge something. Nevertheless, the premise doesn’t always hold true. Think about fake news which is free but it may cost your own life while the Gospels is free, too and it can give you eternal life.
In the spirit of sharing and honouring quality teaching and learning, there is even less honour by profaning in these Prof. Strang videos.