Dude, if you're going to bring upscalers to the comparison, why would you let FSR out? It gives the impression that the 6700xt is worse than it really is..misleading and .not fair in my opinion
@@loucipher7782 Bro, DLSS means deep learning super sampling, which is an upscaler, and the 3.0 means DLSS+FrameGen. It's using an upscaler + framegen. AMD cards as the 6700XT have its counterpart, which is FSR and AFMF. My point is that applying those features only in the Nvidia card will mislead people to think only the 4060 could reach such artificial FPS in that comparison.
@@Raonisk Bro the 4060 is for 1080 and its working better and if turn on rtx the rx 6700xt die, also fsr and afmf its not the same as dlss and fg. FSR: Uses a spatial upscaling method without needing specialized hardware. It relies on traditional image enhancement techniques, such as anti-aliasing and sharpening, without AI involvement. DLSS: Uses artificial intelligence and neural networks. It requires specific hardware, the NVIDIA RTX GPUs, which include tensor cores to process the AI data. To be short fsr is software and dlss is hardware Form the other side AFMF: It is based on frame interpolation to generate additional frames, thereby increasing the frames per second (FPS). It uses advanced motion algorithms to create these intermediate frames. FG: It uses artificial intelligence to generate new complete frames, based on the previous frames and the motion vectors of the game. This technology is an integral part of DLSS 3 and is specifically designed for NVIDIA RTX GPUs, which include dedicated tensor cores. i dont have nathing more to say
@@jacopogiunta738 It actually kinda matters to me. Electricity is expensive in our country so I feel like I'd be paying more I go with 6700xt. That and I also have to upgrade my 500w PSU. But hey, if power consumption isn't an issue for the user, 6700xt is great GPU for price to performance.
@@zuxx00 Doesn't matter. The PC is the last of your worries. 90% of your electric bill is coming from your heating and air. 5% probably from the water heater. Your PC is gaming 4-6 hours most a day. You're talking about 100 watts extra for 4-6 hours a day. You couldn't spot that on your electric bill if you tried. EDIT: Ask me how I know. It doesn't matter if I leave my PC running 24/7 (Idles at 100 watts at the wall) or put it to sleep every night. Just be real. 8GB VRAM is trash for such a new card. NO new card should be coming with 8GB VRAM. I had 8GM VRAM on my RX480 8GB at launch in what? 2016? It was great then. Now I have a 6700XT 12GB. 99% of games I play will always push over 8GB VRAM after 15-20 mins of play time. I usually see 10-11.2GB VRAM used @ 1440p Ultra. Cyberpunk only pushes up to 9GB VRAM total because it's Nvidia sponsored and they had to make it "work" for their GPUs with low VRAM budgets. Do not get a GPU in 2024 with 8GB VRAM. You are not seeing how much VRAM these games ACTUALLY use once you've been playing them for at least 15-20 minutes. It goes up and up and up until it levels out. We're just seeing a fresh boot of the game running a benchmark. These games will use more VRAM than shown in this video when you actually sit down to play them for any decent amount of time. Go AMD. Support the better company. Not Nvidia that cheated with their drivers back in the mid 2000's to make benchmarks look better for them. Not Nvidia who bought PhysX from AGEIA and made it an Nvidia performing feature. Not Nvidia that puts Hairworks in games knowing it performs terribly on AMD. And not Nvidia who made "RTX" ray tracing that specifically runs terribly on AMD. RTX is Nvidia's ray tracing. There is DXR (Microsoft's DirectX Ray Tracing) and UE5's Lumen. AMD does MUCH better in those. AMD = Open Source EVERYTHING Nvidia = Proprietary technology EVERYWHERE Support the company that cares about gamers and innovation. The one that throws you heaps of VRAM at lower prices than Nvidia so you are more future proofed. Support the company that $ for $, outperforms Nvidia 100% of the time in rasterization. Heck, the 6700XT is tearing up the 3070 now because it only has 8GB VRAM while the 6700XT has 12GB VRAM. It released between the 3060 and 3060 Ti... but AMD Fine Wine driver improvements have brought it up to 3070 performance. 3070 Ti in SOME games lmfao.
@@InsidePlay2023 disagree, i have a 3060 and recently tried fsr (on lies of p) and it looked almost the same to me. atleast on 1080p, im debating whether to get a used 3070 , new 4060 or new 6700xt (all these options are the same price for me) Edit: it appears it really depends on the game, i tried in or RE4 and it looked terrible
@@jakelake-u1q Get 4060 without sec thought. My 4060 140w+i7 13700H scores 11600-11900 on timespy(results vary in tests) GPU score=11200-11400, CPU score=14800-15800 best combination of gpu/cpu imho. 3070 in many benchmarks show it's 8-10% slower than 4060(at least my case) you can find benchmarks on 4060 on my channel then compare, it goes on par with 4070M 140w but make sure you get the 140w version of 4060. The 4060 supports FG and let me tell you what, only occupies 400M but doubles your fps with 0 loss in quality. Latency isn't much of a big deal in story games and trust me, fg saves you if you wanna game at 1440p or 4k, going from 30fps to 60fps just because of FG! Who on earth wouldn't want that? And if you enable DLSS Quality +FG then you'll have way more fps. I tried it on Cyberpunk2077 Phantom Liberty(2.1 version ) at 1600p resolution , I disabled DLSS, set it to ultra, ray tracing ultra+path tracing and I got 17fps(7.2gb vram) but when I enable FG, the fps miraculously goes up to 33fps(7.6gb) with native quality . So smooth and game changer. I also tried it on AW2 but didn't upload. Most previous gen gpus that come with more than 8gb vram can't do as well as 4060 140w cuz they lack FG and in raw performance 3070ti is 5-8% than my 4060 in raw performance and 4070 M 140w is 3-5% faster than my 4060 in raw performance which you can't notice the difference if you intend to play at raw performance by switching from each gpu to another but keep in mind, 4060 is cheaper that's why it's better, 4060 supports FG that's why it's better than 3070ti 150w not to mention that 4060 consumes 50% less power than 3070ti 150 but there isn't that much difference among 4060,4070,3070ti 150w in raw performance so it's up to you. Vram is important but I'd take 8GB vram+FG over older 10-12GB vram that lacks FG any day. Watch the desktop 3060 that has 12GB vram in games like AW2 and hellblade2, it can't push the vram up to 8GB let alone 12GB! Total garbage. The desktop 3060ti 8gb is better than the desktop 3060 12gb despite having 4gb less vram. The laptop 4060 is as powerful as the desktop counterpart and it performs same as the desktop 3060ti 8gb vut the 4060 is better cuz it supports FG. Whoever has access to FG and tends to play offline and story games at high resolution knows what gift the dlss fg is
@@abdullahmousa6936 3060 laptop not pc which is 10-15% weaker than pc. eitherway for now its running well most games but its starting to show its age in some modern games (last of us , alan wake 2 are getting 40fps). these are the only games with low performance mostly due to their optimization everything else on 1080p high 60+ but in 2 or 3 years it will show its age even more
MAn.. Check power draw.. DOnt cry fanboy amd. I love my 7800x3d much better and efficient than 14900k but gpus amd only 6800 non xt was the best and 6950xt.
the 7800xt is a pretty good deal now too if you find it at 460 usd, if u can still find a 6800xt below that its great. the rx 6800 is at 350 USD now which is an absolute steal
@@iikatinggangsengii2471 I am using a 40 series GPU myself. The range of games that support FG is just too small to justify the tax on the price. I do find myself using lossless scaling very often instead as it's basically FG in any game.
@@dollmasterx In all Resident Evil games you have to disable Shadow Cache option to get rid of vram bottleneck on 8gb cards at 1440p. Remember doing it with 3070Ti. With 8gb cards there was a lot of go and figure things to do before some games got patched and I didn't want to do it and I didn't want 12gb card or AMD card as well, so I'd rather pay a whopping $1300 for quality 4080 at launch and I don't regret it.
@@hexpert6043 well, then this gpu is a horsesh*t 'cause with a 3060 I can easily play at 1440p. It's a blasphemy if 4060 is not able too. Yeah, I know 3060 has 12GB but it's no excuse.
Never thought the RTX 4060 to be this crappy. No generational leap from the old card and is practically obsolete the moment it got released. The pricing just put the crappiness to the ultimate absurdity. What's Nvidia even thinking? They must've thought people were idiots who'd just buy every Nvidia product for brand loyalty. Their greed has gone way beyond comprehension.
@@aap2900 I will say I did try to make the switch to AMD swapping my 2070 for a 7800xt and it was a bit finicky to get it to work for me personally. I would download their advanced software and it would have this issue of reverting itself to the basic one. I did run DDU before installing it. I did manage to get to to work after a few times of DDU and fiddling with it, I wanna say hat fixed it was a new driver version came out in my time of owning it. The other issue for me was I like playing vr games and that is where it lost me because vr and amd are not the best of friends. I ended up getting help from many other amd vr users and did manage to find a fix but, I sadly had to send it back to get a refund to buy a new Washer that had just broke. I was personally thinking of returning it anyways because the amount of work I had to do to get it where it would suit my personal needs was a headache and I personally would not suggest amd for vr users.
Yeah, 6700xt will bring you higher electricity bill, but not THAT MUCH. It takes ~70 wats more then 4060, in a scale of a year it will cost like ~10 euro. If you want to play with DLSS, take 4060, but remember it struggles with it's VRAM. I, personally would take 6700XT since it's more futureproof, RT is pointless overall in ANY game. What's most important is RAW PERFORMANCE - In that 6700XT is doing WAY better then 4060. Image is sharper on AMD too. If i WERE to UPGRADE i would take 6800, but if the cost is WAY MORE, then 6700XT for sure. You won't be disappointed ^^
@@fennri430 ok thanks for your opinion.. If I use 6700xt for working on rendering it's good?, iam working on 3d designer and 3d visualization interior. Using app like sketchup, autocad,vray etc.
OK. 290$ card (new) vs 560$ card (new). Who would win? And if we count refurbished one, you can get RTX 3070 for almost the same price as 6700XT (newegg prices) and that would be completely different story.
It showed results with DLSS but not with AMF, so it looks like it wants to manipulate results man. Although a percentage of laypeople believe that only DLSS works well, both use information from real frames to generate "fake" ones, so the higher the frequency the better. It would help a lot to enhance the video and the quality of the tests, here's a tip for the next tests.
NVIDIA DLSS = AMD FSR just reminder, not sure why AMD FSR wasn't turned on when NVIDIA DLSS was...both do exactly the same thing Edit: that is, both 'render the game at a smaller resolution then stretch it up to fill the entire monitor'; which is what gives the performance increase - it is possible on both GPUs... (as an example, NVIDIA DLSS and AMD FSR would both render a 4k desired output setting in the game, if set as Ultra-Performance as an option, would render it as just 720p, then 'stretch it up' to fill the monitor - that is what both NVIDIA DLSS and AMD FSR does)
Gaming the Rx 6700xt, but for video editing the rtx4060, both choices are great for what you're looking but if you prefer one aspect more than the other choose that one
Sooo, it seems to me that the 6700xt is better (?), but I noticed that the 4060 is much more widely used. I’m in the process of buying a new PC and I’m really struggling on the GPU, I want to make sure it’ll be future-proof. Any suggestions would be super helpful. Thanks :)
4060 is good because very low power usage and frame generation unless you like AMD brand you can get 6700xt for more vram and future game use more vram otherwise forget these cards and go straight for 4070S for real Ray Tracing experience AMD lack too many feature for card at that price point tbh chances are you wont need to change PSU with nvidia cards as AMD power draw is through the roof for the same performance or even lesser if include frame generation tech
4060 has been boosted so much in recent drivers. I've never seen nvidia make improvements like this from drivers. Love it i would stipl choose it over a 6700xt purely bevause of the dlss and ray tracing and its funyn people go oh the 4060 xant do that. Oh yes it can. 1080p ultra, ray tracing and dlss most games over 60fps. I mean shit its doing 60fps on cyberpunk with dlss even if not ray tracing just saying. Bigger boost then last generations card with dlss in base form. Ive seen boosts from 20 to 60fps. Wuality gives an average of 30fps on my end. But 4070super is what ive got now.
Exactly! 4060 haters are crying on the corner after reading your comment and as someone who owns 4060, I totally confirm this, I updated the drivers and saw significantly fps boost in AW2 . Every game I run on the latest driver beats 3060 12gb in all ways and I believe nvidia won't stop here.
@@InsidePlay2023 it really does it performs much more like a 3060ti especially when using dlss3 it actuslly gets even more. I've seen crazy 30 to 60fps boosts wirh dlss3. It's like what? How? Lol it's insane. Even 4k in some games which blew my mind but with dlss quality I can almost play every game at 1440p ultra.
@@reviewforthetube6485 Bro, I have laptop 4060 (Legion slim 5i 4060 8gb 140w i7 13700H 16gb ddr5 5200mhz and I tried Alan Wake 2(it's uploaded in my channel), without recording, at 1440p/ultra native in the woods(outdoor) I get 35-37fps average and when I enable FG I literally get 1x fps boost(60-70fps)! Literally ! And gets smooth af . When I enable DLSS Quality with FG on which still looks beautiful at 1440p/ultra, I get 80-90fps! Latency doesn't matter in story/offline games and FG is truly a gift. I believe 4060 is hated because like 80% of haters either are waiting for 50 series or are stuck in 30 series and feel betrayed by nvidia for not having FG. That's just pathetic.
4060 is just bad guys, 128 memory bus, 8GB VRAM, slower than a 3060 Ti (especially at 1440P)..but I'm willing to bet Nvidia wont make the same mistakes with their upcoming 5000 series.
4This guy: 4060 is bad guys it won't run no games no more your pc will explode if you use it, even the 1050ti is better than 4060 trussst me Me watching this comment while playing AW2 at 1440p/ultra +DLSS Quality+FG and getting 90fps 😂
RX 6700 XT has better performance overall, aside the power consumption. AMD cards has vivid colors (where Nvidia uses a color compression method), also there's a filter called Radeon Image Sharpenin. Man this feature is great the level of sharpness and detail is incredible. It also reinforce the colors. With FSR you can balance things and turn RT on. I've been using Nvidia and AMD along the years but right now AMD has a better cost for the consumers.
As 6700 xt owner I will buy 4060 for the driver stability, I have reinstall driver many times because dp cable, and must use april 2024 driver (I write this on june 2024) with hdmi cable to stop monitor flashing white.... 😂😂😂
Amd is such a weird company. For cpus it pushes cutting edge tech and yes whe it comes to gpus they act like how intel operates with its cpus. Amd is good if you want traditional rendering but the moment 6ou want upscaling or RT let not to mention frame gen and they fall apart. Fsr 2 is poor incomparison to both xess and dlss, and xess can be used on and gpu as well. Even on none intel arc cards xess performs better than fsr2. I dont get how they push tech for cpus and yet the dwadle all day long for gpus.
@Pikkoroo every time it was it was better than the 6700xt. And if you use balance, which you kinda should with this gpu, you will get even more fps and the overall graphics will still look better. Point I am making here is that Nvidia software that goes along with their hardware is just better. When it comes to pure traditional rendering, yeah amd is better. But again that's more of a who cares at this point. AMD is only for people who don't care about the best in graphical performance and just wants the most fps. Which is perfectly fine and valid. Nvidia is for people who want the best graphics and good fps. Which is also valid. You'd never recommend an amd card over Nvidia if the person is wanting RT. That's just stupid. At least for now. The rumor with amd finally adding in hardware acceleration to their RT for theor next line could make them a much more competitive and viable alternative to such a gamer.
@@Tx_zxво-первых ФПС ниже 60 - это заметно и это реально плохо. Во-вторых если она сейчас не тянет 60 кадров, то через год будет все совсем плохо и там будет уже 30 кадров в актуальных играх. В итоге ты будешь с 2 к монитором и видюхой, которая не тянет под него игры.
I was confused by the comparison and the comments until I realized 4060 and 6700xt cost the same in the US. In my country 6700xt is the same price as 4060ti
maaaan, you amaricans have it so easy with the prices... Here in Bulgaria the avg. monthly income is around 1500lv which is 800$ and for example this gpu costs 900lv which is around 500$ (150-200$ more than regular) anywhere in bulgaria, and amazon doesn't ship this kind of stuff to my country so i am basically fuked as well as the fact that our pay is less so if the ration here and there was the same it would cost you around 1000$ for such gpu which is outrages!
you could buy 2 or 3 good PCs with 7600xt i5 13400F 32gb ram, pretty serious stuff with your pay whereas it would take me 2 whole months of pay to get even 1 😂😂😂 how sad is that for me
the 6700xt is around 17% faster, and the 6750xt is actually the same price rn, which will make it easily 20% faster. AMD Has fsr 3.1 coming and you also have XESS 1.3, and ray tracing sucks at this level so it isnt relevant
I have doubts about your 6700xt I have a 5700 with an r5 5600g and I play cyberpunk at 2k all in ultra at 45 fps - 52 fps (45 fps stable) What problem does the 6700 have? Why didn't you use AMD upscaling?
Look also at the 1% and .1% lows, in Hogwarts Leacy RT you can see them being quite lower even tho the 99% are slightly higher, that means the 6700xt will feel a bit better (or less shit, since we're still talking sub 30 FPS) than the 4060. Only 4000 that makes sense buying is the 4070S tbh, decent performance without insane prices, while from the 4070Ti up to the 4080S you'll pay too much for what you're getting. Under a 4070S, you'll get the same performance or even less of a high RTX 3000 or RX 6000 (which you can find for cheaper).
For 800 usd and a new parts only build get the 6750xt since it costs the same and performs better than a 4060 and has more vram, for cpu you can bump up to the 13600k. Get good value case mobo and cpu cooler, meh ram and good psu. Better value when you build things yourself( unless you need a warranty on the rig)
It still blows my mind peoppe arguing when so many can get such good pcs even budget for cheap. You know i found a 4060 buuld with an i5 13600k for 850 dollars brand new? How tf could you pass up that? My point is get what you want but if you consider price and just want something to use none of these options are bad anymore. I mean look at it most games were what? 5 to 11fps difference? Then you add in dlss for the 4060. I cant see not choosing it if you find a crazy deal. It also won in every rt situation even withou dlss. So advantages are to be had. The fact people would choose a gpu based on the recent tech we have that wont be able to actually utilixe it as well blows my mind. The 4060 will always beat the 6700xt when it comes to newer games using rt and or dlss. Always so the argument is null n void. Im just stating this due to the commnnets we can all talk about whats winning here or there.
RT isn't feasible on cards below a 4070, and isnt a good selling point, especially with 8gb of Vram which itll regularly run out of. DLSS 3 frame gen will also struggle to be taken advantage of due to the VRAM. You'd be missing out on 20% better performance just to be a Nvidia fanboy. Go with whatever is the best value for its performance. The 4060 would need DLSS to match the 6700xt. the 6700xt can also use FSR or XESS to get that same gap again, so its not rlly a good argument. the 6750xt is also cheaper at 295 usd, and is around 5% faster than the 6700xt, which smashes it further.
Yeah I got a AMD® Ryzen™ 7 5700X 8-Core Processor w/ Thermalright Assassin X 120 Refined SE ARGB CPU Cooler ASUS PRIME B550-PLUS AC-HES Motherboard. 16GB Kingston FURY Beast RGB DDR4-3200 RAM (2x 8GB) 1TB NVMe M.2 SSD GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB Graphics Card Corsair 3000D RGB AIRFLOW Mid Tower Chassis, Black Corsair CX650M 650W 80 PLUS Bronze Semi Modular ATX Power Supply Windows® 11 Home For $1000 Canadian and upgraded to 32gb @4000mhz for $110
The 6700 XT smokes the 4060, which is a rebranded 4050 in disguise. This shouldn't even be a comparison. I would choose the 6700 XT over the fake 4060 any day of the week.
@kartikthakor2800 The only bottleneck could be a cpu and psu. I have RX 6700 XT 12gb on a320m mobo, and it works fine, but the motherboard is kinda of a shit for ryzen 5600. It has no problem with GPU but has a problem with CPU.
Reminder: AMD RX 6000 show TDP only for chip, add extra 30-40W to get whole board + fans power consumption RTX 4060 aroud x2 more power efficient (frames per watt).
In my country, RX 6700xt costs almost $455, and the rtx 4060 costs like $342. And seeing the AAA title overall performance, 4060 is the way to go through. As well as i personally like the DLAA feature from NvIDIA, also allowing me to access many apps and for other purposes. I am primarilly going to do encoding and sometimes gaming. But it would have been better if AMD manufactururs could work with the drivers. Other than gaming, 4060 should be the way.
Games :
Horizon Forbidden West - 0:00
Alan Wake 2 - 1:01
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 2:05
CYBERPUNK 2077 | RT - 3:09
Resident Evil 4 - 4:12
Forza Horizon 5 - 5:11
Hogwarts Legacy - 6:22
Hogwarts Legacy | RT - 7:17
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 8:11
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 9:11
Starfield - 10:14
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 11:09
System:
Windows 11
Ryzen 7 7800X3D - bit.ly/43e3VxW
MSI MPG X670E CARBON
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz CL38
GeForce RTX 4060 8GB - bit.ly/3CRMGqh
RADEON RX 6700 XT 12GB - bit.ly/38PlCta
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
Dude, if you're going to bring upscalers to the comparison, why would you let FSR out? It gives the impression that the 6700xt is worse than it really is..misleading and .not fair in my opinion
he used frame generation...
smh...
@@loucipher7782 Bro, DLSS means deep learning super sampling, which is an upscaler, and the 3.0 means DLSS+FrameGen. It's using an upscaler + framegen. AMD cards as the 6700XT have its counterpart, which is FSR and AFMF. My point is that applying those features only in the Nvidia card will mislead people to think only the 4060 could reach such artificial FPS in that comparison.
although miss raon has nothing/little to do w it but yeah, its very uncertain and spent day by day w it like i used to while jobless
@@Raonisk Bro the 4060 is for 1080 and its working better and if turn on rtx the rx 6700xt die, also fsr and afmf its not the same as dlss and fg.
FSR: Uses a spatial upscaling method without needing specialized hardware. It relies on traditional image enhancement techniques, such as anti-aliasing and sharpening, without AI involvement.
DLSS: Uses artificial intelligence and neural networks. It requires specific hardware, the NVIDIA RTX GPUs, which include tensor cores to process the AI data.
To be short fsr is software and dlss is hardware
Form the other side
AFMF: It is based on frame interpolation to generate additional frames, thereby increasing the frames per second (FPS). It uses advanced motion algorithms to create these intermediate frames.
FG: It uses artificial intelligence to generate new complete frames, based on the previous frames and the motion vectors of the game. This technology is an integral part of DLSS 3 and is specifically designed for NVIDIA RTX GPUs, which include dedicated tensor cores.
i dont have nathing more to say
6700xt lower proce better overall performance
But higher power consumption
@@skinscalp222who cares, 4060 is shit , don't try to found good stuff about it
@@jacopogiunta738 It actually kinda matters to me. Electricity is expensive in our country so I feel like I'd be paying more I go with 6700xt. That and I also have to upgrade my 500w PSU. But hey, if power consumption isn't an issue for the user, 6700xt is great GPU for price to performance.
@@zuxx00 Doesn't matter. The PC is the last of your worries. 90% of your electric bill is coming from your heating and air. 5% probably from the water heater. Your PC is gaming 4-6 hours most a day. You're talking about 100 watts extra for 4-6 hours a day.
You couldn't spot that on your electric bill if you tried.
EDIT: Ask me how I know. It doesn't matter if I leave my PC running 24/7 (Idles at 100 watts at the wall) or put it to sleep every night.
Just be real. 8GB VRAM is trash for such a new card. NO new card should be coming with 8GB VRAM. I had 8GM VRAM on my RX480 8GB at launch in what? 2016? It was great then. Now I have a 6700XT 12GB. 99% of games I play will always push over 8GB VRAM after 15-20 mins of play time. I usually see 10-11.2GB VRAM used @ 1440p Ultra. Cyberpunk only pushes up to 9GB VRAM total because it's Nvidia sponsored and they had to make it "work" for their GPUs with low VRAM budgets.
Do not get a GPU in 2024 with 8GB VRAM. You are not seeing how much VRAM these games ACTUALLY use once you've been playing them for at least 15-20 minutes. It goes up and up and up until it levels out. We're just seeing a fresh boot of the game running a benchmark. These games will use more VRAM than shown in this video when you actually sit down to play them for any decent amount of time.
Go AMD. Support the better company. Not Nvidia that cheated with their drivers back in the mid 2000's to make benchmarks look better for them. Not Nvidia who bought PhysX from AGEIA and made it an Nvidia performing feature. Not Nvidia that puts Hairworks in games knowing it performs terribly on AMD.
And not Nvidia who made "RTX" ray tracing that specifically runs terribly on AMD. RTX is Nvidia's ray tracing. There is DXR (Microsoft's DirectX Ray Tracing) and UE5's Lumen. AMD does MUCH better in those.
AMD = Open Source EVERYTHING
Nvidia = Proprietary technology EVERYWHERE
Support the company that cares about gamers and innovation. The one that throws you heaps of VRAM at lower prices than Nvidia so you are more future proofed. Support the company that $ for $, outperforms Nvidia 100% of the time in rasterization. Heck, the 6700XT is tearing up the 3070 now because it only has 8GB VRAM while the 6700XT has 12GB VRAM. It released between the 3060 and 3060 Ti... but AMD Fine Wine driver improvements have brought it up to 3070 performance. 3070 Ti in SOME games lmfao.
@@JustAGuy85AMD has brainwashed your empty fanboy brain with this VRAM story
No AFMF? NO FSR 3.0? No Lossless Scaling?
Not being bias but for me, dlss is the only upscaler worth using. It's so hard to compare it with fsr cause dlss is miles ahead.
@@InsidePlay2023 disagree, i have a 3060 and recently tried fsr (on lies of p) and it looked almost the same to me. atleast on 1080p, im debating whether to get a used 3070 , new 4060 or new 6700xt (all these options are the same price for me)
Edit: it appears it really depends on the game, i tried in or RE4 and it looked terrible
@@jakelake-u1q Get 4060 without sec thought. My 4060 140w+i7 13700H scores 11600-11900 on timespy(results vary in tests) GPU score=11200-11400, CPU score=14800-15800 best combination of gpu/cpu imho. 3070 in many benchmarks show it's 8-10% slower than 4060(at least my case) you can find benchmarks on 4060 on my channel then compare, it goes on par with 4070M 140w but make sure you get the 140w version of 4060.
The 4060 supports FG and let me tell you what, only occupies 400M but doubles your fps with 0 loss in quality. Latency isn't much of a big deal in story games and trust me, fg saves you if you wanna game at 1440p or 4k, going from 30fps to 60fps just because of FG! Who on earth wouldn't want that? And if you enable DLSS Quality +FG then you'll have way more fps.
I tried it on Cyberpunk2077 Phantom Liberty(2.1 version ) at 1600p resolution , I disabled DLSS, set it to ultra, ray tracing ultra+path tracing and I got 17fps(7.2gb vram) but when I enable FG, the fps miraculously goes up to 33fps(7.6gb) with native quality . So smooth and game changer. I also tried it on AW2 but didn't upload.
Most previous gen gpus that come with more than 8gb vram can't do as well as 4060 140w cuz they lack FG and in raw performance 3070ti is 5-8% than my 4060 in raw performance and 4070 M 140w is 3-5% faster than my 4060 in raw performance which you can't notice the difference if you intend to play at raw performance by switching from each gpu to another but keep in mind, 4060 is cheaper that's why it's better, 4060 supports FG that's why it's better than 3070ti 150w not to mention that 4060 consumes 50% less power than 3070ti 150 but there isn't that much difference among 4060,4070,3070ti 150w in raw performance so it's up to you.
Vram is important but I'd take 8GB vram+FG over older 10-12GB vram that lacks FG any day.
Watch the desktop 3060 that has 12GB vram in games like AW2 and hellblade2, it can't push the vram up to 8GB let alone 12GB! Total garbage. The desktop 3060ti 8gb is better than the desktop 3060 12gb despite having 4gb less vram. The laptop 4060 is as powerful as the desktop counterpart and it performs same as the desktop 3060ti 8gb vut the 4060 is better cuz it supports FG. Whoever has access to FG and tends to play offline and story games at high resolution knows what gift the dlss fg is
@@jakelake-u1q why would you upgrade from a rtx 3060 though
@@abdullahmousa6936 3060 laptop not pc which is 10-15% weaker than pc. eitherway for now its running well most games but its starting to show its age in some modern games (last of us , alan wake 2 are getting 40fps). these are the only games with low performance mostly due to their optimization everything else on 1080p high 60+ but in 2 or 3 years it will show its age even more
What if You Use FSR on AMD Gpu 💀☠
I mean fsr is avail on every gpu, not only nvidia so the improvements should be around the same
frame generatopm NVIDIA 💀💀
Not being bias but for me, dlss is the only upscaler worth using. It's so hard to compare it with fsr cause dlss is miles ahead.
MAn.. Check power draw.. DOnt cry fanboy amd. I love my 7800x3d much better and efficient than 14900k but gpus amd only 6800 non xt was the best and 6950xt.
You cant use the FG mod without DLSS and AMD doesnt have DLSS . DLSS 3 is already FG so doesnt needs mods .
The only thing better than the 6700 xt is the 6800 xt.
the 7800xt is a pretty good deal now too if you find it at 460 usd, if u can still find a 6800xt below that its great. the rx 6800 is at 350 USD now which is an absolute steal
6750xt, 6800: 🥲🥲
The 4060 is like the only card that had an okay-ish price that generation.
Still kinda disappointing that it doesn't really beat the 6700xt.
it has dlss3 and framegen which can best 6700xt like double perf
they arent optional gimmick really, try it yourself
@@iikatinggangsengii2471 I am using a 40 series GPU myself. The range of games that support FG is just too small to justify the tax on the price.
I do find myself using lossless scaling very often instead as it's basically FG in any game.
@@iikatinggangsengii2471
the 6700xt has fsr
@@iikatinggangsengii2471use a lossless scaling app with 6700 xt, and your 4060 trash will disappear into the oblivion.
Look at VRAM, 4060 is really struggling.
Vram doesn't matter at 1080p what u smoking guys?😃
@@lc756 First, it's not 1080p, it's 1440p.
Look at 4:44 the huge drop in Resident Evil 4. 4060 VRAM reached its max
@@dollmasterx In all Resident Evil games you have to disable Shadow Cache option to get rid of vram bottleneck on 8gb cards at 1440p. Remember doing it with 3070Ti. With 8gb cards there was a lot of go and figure things to do before some games got patched and I didn't want to do it and I didn't want 12gb card or AMD card as well, so I'd rather pay a whopping $1300 for quality 4080 at launch and I don't regret it.
Who in this world would play at 1440p with 4060, this comparison has no sense, the 4060 ti is the minimum for a good experience at 1440p ( NVIDIA)
@@hexpert6043 well, then this gpu is a horsesh*t 'cause with a 3060 I can easily play at 1440p. It's a blasphemy if 4060 is not able too. Yeah, I know 3060 has 12GB but it's no excuse.
6700xt looks good
Looks good for 2020
@@irving1313 You dropped this!. 🖕 Fu""er
@@irving1313 nvidia glazer 6700xt is better than 4060ti or 4060 if you change the amd settings
Never thought the RTX 4060 to be this crappy. No generational leap from the old card and is practically obsolete the moment it got released. The pricing just put the crappiness to the ultimate absurdity. What's Nvidia even thinking? They must've thought people were idiots who'd just buy every Nvidia product for brand loyalty. Their greed has gone way beyond comprehension.
funny enough people are in fact idiots who'd just buy every nvidia product for brand loyalty
@@aap2900 I will say I did try to make the switch to AMD swapping my 2070 for a 7800xt and it was a bit finicky to get it to work for me personally. I would download their advanced software and it would have this issue of reverting itself to the basic one. I did run DDU before installing it. I did manage to get to to work after a few times of DDU and fiddling with it, I wanna say hat fixed it was a new driver version came out in my time of owning it. The other issue for me was I like playing vr games and that is where it lost me because vr and amd are not the best of friends. I ended up getting help from many other amd vr users and did manage to find a fix but, I sadly had to send it back to get a refund to buy a new Washer that had just broke. I was personally thinking of returning it anyways because the amount of work I had to do to get it where it would suit my personal needs was a headache and I personally would not suggest amd for vr users.
4060 aka 4050 isn't a bad card, its excellent actually. if it comes within $230
Yeah if it comes with that price it could be a good budget card
its nvidia tho they wouldnt price things cheaply for the consumer
Poor guy doesn't have money buy rtx cards
i think they should do 215 or if I exaggerate 199(never happening lol)
@@lc756 we have money but we ain't fools to spend on 300$ shit.
6700XT each day, every day of the week 👑
Trash. 🤢
Weak sauce AMD. 😆
@@princegroovefar better than shit tx😂
Why didn't you try the 6700xt with fsr3 in avatar to know what gap of performance does it make
Is the electricity consumption of these two VGAs very different? I mean the monthly electricity costs will be 6700xt higher? just curious.
Yeah, 6700xt will bring you higher electricity bill, but not THAT MUCH. It takes ~70 wats more then 4060, in a scale of a year it will cost like ~10 euro. If you want to play with DLSS, take 4060, but remember it struggles with it's VRAM. I, personally would take 6700XT since it's more futureproof, RT is pointless overall in ANY game. What's most important is RAW PERFORMANCE - In that 6700XT is doing WAY better then 4060. Image is sharper on AMD too. If i WERE to UPGRADE i would take 6800, but if the cost is WAY MORE, then 6700XT for sure. You won't be disappointed ^^
@@fennri430 ok thanks for your opinion..
If I use 6700xt for working on rendering it's good?, iam working on 3d designer and 3d visualization interior.
Using app like sketchup, autocad,vray etc.
@@DityaSA additional VRAM will help you for sure. I would take AMD.
@@fennri430 thanks, I'll try 6700xt
RX 6700 xt is yes but....
Average watt 170 💀, high power consumption
In the long run, will the 6700xt's monthly electricity costs be more expensive?
Menurut gw sih watt di atas 400w baru berasa perbulan dan pertahun nya
10% more fps for the 6700xt, 20% in the best case, BUT 50% up in power consumption.
Can't say its a win..
OK. 290$ card (new) vs 560$ card (new). Who would win?
And if we count refurbished one, you can get RTX 3070 for almost the same price as 6700XT (newegg prices) and that would be completely different story.
6700xt better than 3070 and 4060 ti
Bruh didnt used FSR just make 4060 win lol😂😂😂
Dlss is the only thing saving the 4060, rx 6700xt smokes it 100%
6700xt? Same price, better performance
It showed results with DLSS but not with AMF, so it looks like it wants to manipulate results man. Although a percentage of laypeople believe that only DLSS works well, both use information from real frames to generate "fake" ones, so the higher the frequency the better. It would help a lot to enhance the video and the quality of the tests, here's a tip for the next tests.
Compras una 4060 para no usar DLSS 3? nice
8GB VRAM is not enough these days. High FPS doesnt mean anything if your game texture looks like PS1 era.
its enough no one buy these to play at 4k w path tracing
@@iikatinggangsengii2471 its different when you have to enable fg and dlss even at 1080p
DLSS is a W but should we pay this much ?
NVIDIA DLSS = AMD FSR
just reminder, not sure why AMD FSR wasn't turned on when NVIDIA DLSS was...both do exactly the same thing
Edit: that is, both 'render the game at a smaller resolution then stretch it up to fill the entire monitor'; which is what gives the performance increase - it is possible on both GPUs...
(as an example, NVIDIA DLSS and AMD FSR would both render a 4k desired output setting in the game, if set as Ultra-Performance as an option, would render it as just 720p, then 'stretch it up' to fill the monitor - that is what both NVIDIA DLSS and AMD FSR does)
Kinda sucks Nvidia pricing a 50 class card at 60 class prices
performance wise rx 6700xt is better but the power consumption of rx 6700 xt is like have two 4060 tho
Tbh i think the 8gb is the major limiting factor ngl
6700 XT is a great GPU
which one is better for 1080p gaming and beginner video editing
Gaming the Rx 6700xt, but for video editing the rtx4060, both choices are great for what you're looking but if you prefer one aspect more than the other choose that one
ummmm FSR?
He is dumb😂😂😂
Sooo, it seems to me that the 6700xt is better (?), but I noticed that the 4060 is much more widely used. I’m in the process of buying a new PC and I’m really struggling on the GPU, I want to make sure it’ll be future-proof. Any suggestions would be super helpful. Thanks :)
When it comes to the GPU it's way easier upgradable then a CPU so future proofing is not that important.
4060 is good because very low power usage and frame generation
unless you like AMD brand you can get 6700xt for more vram and future game use more vram
otherwise forget these cards and go straight for 4070S for real Ray Tracing experience
AMD lack too many feature for card at that price point tbh
chances are you wont need to change PSU with nvidia cards as AMD power draw is through the roof for the same performance or even lesser if include frame generation tech
6700 xt for 320, was my best purchase ever
Just snagged one off marketplace for 120. Going into a second build but damn it's killer
The rx6800 no xt is a pretty good deal as well.
For like US$360
Well..There's always a better one and is one there for 6800 too@@patrickstar3820
Rx 6700xt has more raw power
The 4060 is really underpowered, unless its DLSS.
RTX 4060 cost $293 at New Egg and RX 6700 XT cost $399. At least the link you provided above. So is it really a fair comparison?
The 6700XT is $299 at Amazon.
no its not, and the RTX 4060 isnt a 1440p card or a max setting card
I bought a 4060ti 16GB for $430 new on cyber Monday. 😎💪🏻
Check the 6750xt, it'll be cheaper. 6700xt stock is drying up, but 6750xts are 295 in the US rn.
@@iowesty no, but its good to use to test their performance properly. the 6700xt is just better
4060 has been boosted so much in recent drivers. I've never seen nvidia make improvements like this from drivers. Love it i would stipl choose it over a 6700xt purely bevause of the dlss and ray tracing and its funyn people go oh the 4060 xant do that. Oh yes it can. 1080p ultra, ray tracing and dlss most games over 60fps.
I mean shit its doing 60fps on cyberpunk with dlss even if not ray tracing just saying. Bigger boost then last generations card with dlss in base form.
Ive seen boosts from 20 to 60fps. Wuality gives an average of 30fps on my end. But 4070super is what ive got now.
Exactly! 4060 haters are crying on the corner after reading your comment and as someone who owns 4060, I totally confirm this, I updated the drivers and saw significantly fps boost in AW2 . Every game I run on the latest driver beats 3060 12gb in all ways and I believe nvidia won't stop here.
@@InsidePlay2023 it really does it performs much more like a 3060ti especially when using dlss3 it actuslly gets even more. I've seen crazy 30 to 60fps boosts wirh dlss3. It's like what? How? Lol it's insane. Even 4k in some games which blew my mind but with dlss quality I can almost play every game at 1440p ultra.
@@reviewforthetube6485 Bro, I have laptop 4060 (Legion slim 5i 4060 8gb 140w i7 13700H 16gb ddr5 5200mhz and I tried Alan Wake 2(it's uploaded in my channel), without recording, at 1440p/ultra native in the woods(outdoor) I get 35-37fps average and when I enable FG I literally get 1x fps boost(60-70fps)! Literally ! And gets smooth af . When I enable DLSS Quality with FG on which still looks beautiful at 1440p/ultra, I get 80-90fps! Latency doesn't matter in story/offline games and FG is truly a gift. I believe 4060 is hated because like 80% of haters either are waiting for 50 series or are stuck in 30 series and feel betrayed by nvidia for not having FG. That's just pathetic.
I can't even see one negative reply below this comment
Are u smoking weed??😂😂@@InsidePlay2023
Good to know, I'm going with 4060 it is then
Во первых 6700 xt стоит 370 баксов, еще и памяти у нее 12гб , а 4060 только для fullhd, тогда легче сравнить ее с 4060ti
4060 is just bad guys, 128 memory bus, 8GB VRAM, slower than a 3060 Ti (especially at 1440P)..but I'm willing to bet Nvidia wont make the same mistakes with their upcoming 5000 series.
Yeah, they’re not going to make middle-end in 50 series for desktops
4This guy: 4060 is bad guys it won't run no games no more your pc will explode if you use it, even the 1050ti is better than 4060 trussst me
Me watching this comment while playing AW2 at 1440p/ultra +DLSS Quality+FG and getting 90fps 😂
Every gpu update makes 4060 faster. At some point 6700xt will be crushed just like 3060 that loses to 4060 by 10-15% despite having more vram
5060 will be still 8gb
RX 6700 XT has better performance overall, aside the power consumption. AMD cards has vivid colors (where Nvidia uses a color compression method), also there's a filter called Radeon Image Sharpenin. Man this feature is great the level of sharpness and detail is incredible. It also reinforce the colors. With FSR you can balance things and turn RT on. I've been using Nvidia and AMD along the years but right now AMD has a better cost for the consumers.
Should I buy a 1440 p or 1080p can you suggest
1:31 Nvidia dlss ✅ AMD FSR ❌
6800XT $410 Amazon EEUU.
I'm confused 😕 buying a 1440p or 1080p and not sure if 6700xt could get better frames
1440p is worth it. Go for it.
Kind of bs to show dlss performance and not include fsr
i7 14700k without graphics card
Rx 6700xt - 600$
Vs
Rtx 4060 - 400$
Ta na cara que a rx6700xt é superior esse é o poder bruto dela
*6700 is not powerful enough to consume 230W* 🙈
Amd: 😁
Nvidia: 😐
We need 12gb rtx 4060
What is your test rig I get more fps with my 2060 that your getting with the 4060 😮😂
Who best
Rx 6750 Xt
Rtx 4090
Remember
6700xt will run fine gta6 1080p in 2025
4060 will run gta6 720p in 2025 with low textures not enough vram.
Заблуждение
lmao how old are you?🤣🤣🤣
Bro stop smoking weed😂
Source: Trust me bro
Roberto Paz Soldan 9641 is the best dev on Rockstar. You better believe him.
RTX 4060 has better energy efficiency.
In the long run, will the 6700xt's monthly electricity costs be more expensive?
Test the Arc A580 please
6700xt is the clear winner here.
Faster and more future proof.
No dlss or upscaler (50%) increase for Nvidia give or take.. honestly
4060 она и рядом не стоит с 6700xt!!!
As 6700 xt owner I will buy 4060 for the driver stability, I have reinstall driver many times because dp cable, and must use april 2024 driver (I write this on june 2024) with hdmi cable to stop monitor flashing white.... 😂😂😂
I have the same gpu and I didn’t do it once
For a year
@@mhr7769is it true about the amd drivers nowadays?
@@nato7364that's old news.
@@nato7364 Nope.
RTX 4060 1080p
RTX 4070 1440p
To be fair, i want to see EX 6600 XT vs RTX 4060
if anyone still think that RTX 4060 is a better choice, remember they had RTX 3060 with 12 GB VRam for no reason.
the 3060 12gb exists because it was gonna be a 6gb card originally, then Nvidia realised they screwed up and just doubled it
@@Definedd so you just gonna ignore the fact that RTX 4060 (not Ti) also available in 12GB VRam variant?
@@niezzayt3809 what?? it isnt lol
@@Definedd it is. There are several Asian region 4060 with 12 GB VRam.
I'm sorry if you never heard it
@@niezzayt3809 it literally doesnt exist so idk what ur on but sure
DLSS e FSR são conversores de HERTZ do monitor, baixa para @60 HERTZ aí dobra o FPS
6700xt is better than rtx 4060
4060 is just a joke for this price
Amd is such a weird company. For cpus it pushes cutting edge tech and yes whe it comes to gpus they act like how intel operates with its cpus. Amd is good if you want traditional rendering but the moment 6ou want upscaling or RT let not to mention frame gen and they fall apart. Fsr 2 is poor incomparison to both xess and dlss, and xess can be used on and gpu as well. Even on none intel arc cards xess performs better than fsr2.
I dont get how they push tech for cpus and yet the dwadle all day long for gpus.
You say that like the 4060 was pushing acceptable fps with dlss it was mostly still sub 60…
@Pikkoroo every time it was it was better than the 6700xt. And if you use balance, which you kinda should with this gpu, you will get even more fps and the overall graphics will still look better.
Point I am making here is that Nvidia software that goes along with their hardware is just better.
When it comes to pure traditional rendering, yeah amd is better. But again that's more of a who cares at this point.
AMD is only for people who don't care about the best in graphical performance and just wants the most fps. Which is perfectly fine and valid.
Nvidia is for people who want the best graphics and good fps. Which is also valid.
You'd never recommend an amd card over Nvidia if the person is wanting RT. That's just stupid. At least for now. The rumor with amd finally adding in hardware acceleration to their RT for theor next line could make them a much more competitive and viable alternative to such a gamer.
can you do 7800XT vs 4090 next please? thank you
Не разумно...
Ее конкурент это rtx 4070
Bruh, that is a terrible comparison.
Pointless test honestly.
Rtx on
Ни то ни то, для 2к не годится, хоть с дегенерацией кадров, только понижать настройки
ой какая трагедия, фпс ниже немного ниже 60 упадет
@@Tx_zxво-первых ФПС ниже 60 - это заметно и это реально плохо. Во-вторых если она сейчас не тянет 60 кадров, то через год будет все совсем плохо и там будет уже 30 кадров в актуальных играх. В итоге ты будешь с 2 к монитором и видюхой, которая не тянет под него игры.
First
NVIDIA>AMD
FSR laughing in corner 😂😂😂
Don't buy trashdeon GPUs in 2024
Yeah have fun using dlss always on a 4060 to still get under 60fps lmao
I love my MSI Gaming X 4060 ti 16GB card. Screw AMD’s hot trash cards! 😂
keep crying
Cope
@@loadedfry2.089 About?
@@thesilentassassin1167 Why? AMD is dog shit. 🤡
obvious bait
I was confused by the comparison and the comments until I realized 4060 and 6700xt cost the same in the US. In my country 6700xt is the same price as 4060ti
same loh rtx 4060 new unit is the same price with 6700xt second hand😅
AFMF ? RSR ? FSR 3.0 ? RADBOOST ?
🤓
Не мужик , а что ты где dlls включал , почему fsr не включил ?
maaaan, you amaricans have it so easy with the prices... Here in Bulgaria the avg. monthly income is around 1500lv which is 800$ and for example this gpu costs 900lv which is around 500$ (150-200$ more than regular) anywhere in bulgaria, and amazon doesn't ship this kind of stuff to my country so i am basically fuked as well as the fact that our pay is less so if the ration here and there was the same it would cost you around 1000$ for such gpu which is outrages!
also the rx 6700xt is around 100$ to 200$ more than the 4060
you could buy 2 or 3 good PCs with 7600xt i5 13400F 32gb ram, pretty serious stuff with your pay whereas it would take me 2 whole months of pay to get even 1 😂😂😂 how sad is that for me
So. You take into account dlss but not fsr 2.1 or 3.0, is there a lottle of video on your bias 😂😂😂😂
If you need extra shit to make it better then it's not better lol
With very less difference i would personally choose the 4060 for its power efficiency and other nvidia features
6700xt is cheaper
the 6700xt is around 17% faster, and the 6750xt is actually the same price rn, which will make it easily 20% faster. AMD Has fsr 3.1 coming and you also have XESS 1.3, and ray tracing sucks at this level so it isnt relevant
Extra 4gb vram says hello
4060 has 128bit bus with 8gb vram, puny card 😂
8GB Vram = Sttutering Gameplay...
I have doubts about your 6700xt
I have a 5700 with an r5 5600g and I play cyberpunk at 2k all in ultra at 45 fps - 52 fps (45 fps stable)
What problem does the 6700 have?
Why didn't you use AMD upscaling?
4060 is another Nvidia cash grabbing scam before they come up with a new card, hated them with a passion, they always do this.
А почему у них "мем" разный?
Look also at the 1% and .1% lows, in Hogwarts Leacy RT you can see them being quite lower even tho the 99% are slightly higher, that means the 6700xt will feel a bit better (or less shit, since we're still talking sub 30 FPS) than the 4060.
Only 4000 that makes sense buying is the 4070S tbh, decent performance without insane prices, while from the 4070Ti up to the 4080S you'll pay too much for what you're getting.
Under a 4070S, you'll get the same performance or even less of a high RTX 3000 or RX 6000 (which you can find for cheaper).
well about power consumption 4060 win.
well go green stuff 🤡
For 800 usd and a new parts only build get the 6750xt since it costs the same and performs better than a 4060 and has more vram, for cpu you can bump up to the 13600k. Get good value case mobo and cpu cooler, meh ram and good psu. Better value when you build things yourself( unless you need a warranty on the rig)
Что значит 1% low?
It still blows my mind peoppe arguing when so many can get such good pcs even budget for cheap. You know i found a 4060 buuld with an i5 13600k for 850 dollars brand new? How tf could you pass up that? My point is get what you want but if you consider price and just want something to use none of these options are bad anymore.
I mean look at it most games were what? 5 to 11fps difference? Then you add in dlss for the 4060. I cant see not choosing it if you find a crazy deal.
It also won in every rt situation even withou dlss.
So advantages are to be had. The fact people would choose a gpu based on the recent tech we have that wont be able to actually utilixe it as well blows my mind. The 4060 will always beat the 6700xt when it comes to newer games using rt and or dlss. Always so the argument is null n void. Im just stating this due to the commnnets we can all talk about whats winning here or there.
I built a 13700K and 4060ti rig that smokes AMD’s trash. Don’t mind the haters, bro.
Team Intel and Nvidia all day! ☝🏻
RT isn't feasible on cards below a 4070, and isnt a good selling point, especially with 8gb of Vram which itll regularly run out of. DLSS 3 frame gen will also struggle to be taken advantage of due to the VRAM. You'd be missing out on 20% better performance just to be a Nvidia fanboy. Go with whatever is the best value for its performance. The 4060 would need DLSS to match the 6700xt. the 6700xt can also use FSR or XESS to get that same gap again, so its not rlly a good argument. the 6750xt is also cheaper at 295 usd, and is around 5% faster than the 6700xt, which smashes it further.
Yeah I got a
AMD® Ryzen™ 7 5700X 8-Core Processor w/ Thermalright Assassin X 120 Refined SE ARGB CPU Cooler
ASUS PRIME B550-PLUS AC-HES Motherboard.
16GB Kingston FURY Beast RGB DDR4-3200 RAM (2x 8GB)
1TB NVMe M.2 SSD
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB Graphics Card
Corsair 3000D RGB AIRFLOW Mid Tower Chassis, Black
Corsair CX650M 650W 80 PLUS Bronze Semi Modular ATX Power Supply
Windows® 11 Home
For $1000 Canadian and upgraded to 32gb @4000mhz for $110
@30 fps even with dlss it was sub 60fps that’s what you’re hyping up..
@@puffyips compared to not being 60fps at all? Yes
Сто то за ms? Дллр убирает задержку?
The 6700 XT smokes the 4060, which is a rebranded 4050 in disguise. This shouldn't even be a comparison. I would choose the 6700 XT over the fake 4060 any day of the week.
haahah :D 6700 need 200w vs 4060 110w... and the 6700 is the colder.... what a fuck is this? same cpu, same watt and 6700 side is again, colder... :D
Every PC building related video the comments are illiterate. Why?
@@tingispingisthey just looking for points to make.
Muy buena tarjeta la RX6700XT
amd looks dope
Can i use this Card on h610 motherboard pls reply 😢
BIOS updated?
Ofc u can
@@limobs without any problem?
@kartikthakor2800 The only bottleneck could be a cpu and psu. I have RX 6700 XT 12gb on a320m mobo, and it works fine, but the motherboard is kinda of a shit for ryzen 5600. It has no problem with GPU but has a problem with CPU.
Reminder:
AMD RX 6000 show TDP only for chip, add extra 30-40W to get whole board + fans power consumption
RTX 4060 aroud x2 more power efficient (frames per watt).
In my country, RX 6700xt costs almost $455, and the rtx 4060 costs like $342. And seeing the AAA title overall performance, 4060 is the way to go through. As well as i personally like the DLAA feature from NvIDIA, also allowing me to access many apps and for other purposes. I am primarilly going to do encoding and sometimes gaming. But it would have been better if AMD manufactururs could work with the drivers. Other than gaming, 4060 should be the way.
Test loss scaling frame gen .