Theirs no way you’re getting 40 fps with a 3090 if I’m getting 30-50 fps with my gaming laptop with a 3070 ultra settings and psycho raytracing on Cyberpunk. Theirs something wrong here.
In Italy the 3090 costs 1100 $, the 4090 starts at 2000 $ for the founders edition and from 2500 $ for the custom. So you get x1.75 performance for x 2.3 price
but thats a highend card you cant compare that... you dont play games double as fast... you can just get e.g. the resolution from 1440p to 2160p with same fps so its bit better visual quality but is it worth that prize? you can get same fps with a 3060ti on 1080p
@@crazywall256 In my country singapore the following RTX 4090 models cost above SGD $3000, quoting the list from my local shop. That is equivalent to about $2400++ in USD dollars. Freaking insane. You are lucky to purchase it at 1599.99 in USD. TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 OC Edition 24GB GDDR6X - SGD $3209 ROG Strix GeForce RTX® 4090 OC Edition 24GB GDDR6X - SGD $3429
@@Universeverse923 Haha, true :D And comparing the 4090 to my purchase of the 6950xt (3090 performance) it's 70-95% more performance for 200-230% more price!! A reasonable price for a 4090 should be not more than 1200 bucks.
Fans are particularly to blame there was a pretty good sized hate mob pushing for the game to come out still mai ly on cdpr they should have been honest and just been like look the game handels like shit were gonna hold it for a year and get it working
In other words. The 4090 is a massively faster card but the 3090 is more than adequate in all but a few select games. I'd like to see a VR performance comparison.
The 4090 is more power efficient as well, so you pay for research & development too.Also, I dont see you complaining about iphones being overpriced as well despite offering less lmao
@@GamingIntelCoreM-y Iphones are massively overpriced for what they are, particularly any 'new' version that has some minor change nobody needs for some stupid additional cost. Needless to say I do not have an Iphone (and no, not because I couldn't afford it)
@@Mutrino the world disagrees with you since iphones are the #1 selling phone. 1.36 billion people own an iphone (according to google). If it was "overpriced" people wouldn't buy it. Iphone has the fastest chips, best cameras, most polished os, and amazing battery life. No other phone checks all those boxes, sure some niche android phone might have a giant 999 megapixel camera that's slightly better than an iphone camera but it's gonna be garbage in every other category. As someone who used to own a samsung galaxy phone, I can say that iphones are just better. They're expensive, but they're not "overpriced" relatively speaking when comparing to the competition. The added "freedom" or "customization" of an android phone is useless for most people. Obviously this is my opinion, but the market agrees with me. Same thing with Nvidia. Nvidia is basically the apple of the gpu world.
@@ilovehotdogs125790 I disagree with your statement. 'If it was overpriced people wouldn't buy it'. That is simply not true. I am not saying iphones are 'bad' phones. They are certainly good phones. But it is nonsense to say that they always win in every category. Simply not true. When you start comparing the flagship phones the Samsung galaxy phones are superior to the Iphones when it comes to battery life and cameras. 'Better' very much depends on your use scenario. As an example, for my use case a windows machine is far superior to a Mac. And when it comes to stupid fast chips, cool, most people don't need/use that either. Iphones are stupid expensive to repair but do keep their value better. So overall, certainly not the clear win for Iphones you make it out to be. It very much depends.
Great comparison video I just recently bought a 3090 right before the 4090 came out because it was at a good price. The fact that you are getting close to 100 FPS at 4K with a 3090 is really reassuring considering that I game at 1440p which will give me more than enough FPS at ultra settings
Hey, I plan on purchasing a 3090 ti also, what CpU would you recommend? I was thinking about purchasing a 12700k but not sure if I should get a 12900k or a 13th gen. The 12900k and 13th gen run really hot so If I go with those I would have to upgrade my AIO. I plan on gaming at 1440 p and sometimes 4k.
@@dusk3219 for gaming only many even recommend the 12600k and I have seen it's performance in many reviews, it holds up well. But for me as my recently built machine was also a work station so I opted for the 12700k, it's a great CPU and was a good choice for me. So I think you're pretty safe going with the 12700k, the 12900k has a good performance boost but if you don't run any other workloads than gaming then I think it might be overkill esp with power consumption and then the obvious price difference. Same goes for the 13th gen, I watched some reviews they are a great performance boost and the same 13700k has a lot of boost over 12700k but then again the downside - power consumption has been increased and then comes the price, I say if Money is not a problem you can go for the 13700k heck even the 13600k as its gaming performance is close to the 12900k !
@@CovertPhilosopher Thanks man, this was reassuring! Could you define “workloads”? I mainly plan on gaming. I have a dual monitor setup where I normally watch a show, movie, anime or RUclips on my second monitor all while gaming. Nothing too major. My PC would purely be for entertainment for now. Money is very tight at the moment so If I could save money by going with a 12700k that’s what I would love to do! But if I need to upgrade I would. So you think I should go with the 12700k? Also I was wondering does a 3090 ti *need* to be water cooled to be efficient ? When I look up best coolers for 3090 ti, see people using water cooling as a solution. Does it really run that hot? Could I just use fans to cool it? I don’t plan on OC my gpu. Sorry to bombard you with a bunch of questions but this is my first pc build
@@dusk3219 sorry for the late reply, so by workloads I meant specific tasks that hog the CPU with or without the GPU in use. Like some programs that require processing or calculations a lot and also multi threaded usage, for me that could be development related usage based on running of processor n memory heavy programs. For your use case I think your pretty good as it's only for entertainment purposes but opening multiple apps alongside like you intend I would recommend getting a minimum of 16gb ram. As for the CPU i think the i7 12700K would be solid for you, not advocating as I have it, I think it will future proof you a bit too, and talking about the future - yes when buying myself I checked out the upcoming sockets, so your 12th gen board will support the 13th gen but beyond that like for the 14 or 15 gen yes you will need a new board but that is us looking too far down the road. So I think yes if money is a constraint just go for the 12th gen on either the 12600 or the 12700k, hope this helps. And as for the GPU, air coolers run just fine, though keep in mind while looking for one find a GPU from an AIB preferably which has good reviews and esp on cooling. As for the comparisons yes the water cooled rigs are more efficient but require more maintenance, air cooled CPU and GPU always have a longer life according to experts and provide decent enough cooling. But - if you don't want a mini heater in your room dishing out so much hot air and that heat is of a major concern to you then by all means go for the liquid cooler, just bear in mind that the RnD should be thorough and that you buy something that best suits you and has a good overall life. P.S. I also did my first ever build after decades recently so I got to know some stuff :)
@@CovertPhilosopher No problem! Better than no reply at all! Bro you made my day with this reply. Ive been frustrated for weeks trying to figure out the best specs for my needs and budget and the internet was not helpful whatsoever. You’re literally carrying my PC build and I really appreciate you. Now, I plan on doing 32 g of ram from either kingston fury or corsair, but I’m not sure if I should get ddr4 or ddr5… I should have a compatible motherboard for 5 but I’ve heard about ddr5 being not worth the upgrade and ddr4 outperforming 5 or something like that, I haven’t done much research. What do you think
In many games, the 0.1% lows of the 4090 are higher than the avg of the 3090, now that's impressive. I hope this kind of performance increase will at least somwhat be inherited by the lower tier cards too...
The RTX 4090 is around 50%-80% faster than the RTX 3090, whilst consuming around 10% higher power (or in other reviews 30% higher). In price to performance comparison the RTX 4090 is 1599$ and the 3090 is around 900$, so I would say it's pretty balanced. With all of those metrics I would say if you want the absolute top end, best of the best gpu, the RTX 4090 is for you, but the RTX 3090 and RX 6900 XT is still a good choice. If you don't want to pay 1600$ for a gpu, just wait for the RX 7000 series. On the other hand, those gpu releases will definitely affect the prices of GPU in lower tier models, so for us low- mid range gamers, this is the right time to buy a gpu.
No one in 'the Know' is going to touch the 4090 right now due to issues with the 12vhpwr connector. This has been dominating the hardware news for the last couple of days. Poor scalpers! I really feel sorry for the people that bought this card.... the EARLY ADOPTERS TAX is a btch sometimes. This is the main reason why people always say to wait a couple months. People who spend that kind of money on a card don't care much about the Price to performance ratios. Remember at launch the 3090 was nearly double the price of the 3080 while only offering 10% more performance. Then people tried to bill the 3090 as a Poor Man's workstation card. I can't really think of too many xx80, xx80ti, xx90, or Titan cards that were a good value in comparison to lower tier cards.
@@Cupapet93 AMD did back up most of these claims stating performance has been beyond previous expectations, so who knows. Is it possible? Of course. But am I personally expecting it? Can't make a judgement call until I see early benchmarking leaks.
Андрей, Спасибо, что продолжаете радовать тестами, как всегда жирный лайк! Есть один вопрос! А будет в дальнейшем стоит жадать? видео с 13900k + 4090 в разных играх в сравнение 1080/1440/4k (знаю такое есть видео 8 дней назад выходило, но оно в сравнение с 12900k). Хотелось бы сравнить разницу в 3 разрешениях с уже вышедшим флагманом от intel. ну или хотя было бы круто сделать только два разрешения 2/4K.
Considering you can get a slightly used 3090 for almost a third the price, the uplift in performance doesnt seem worth it. I’m currently running a 3090, and i’m going to wait for the 5080/5090
I'm late to the party, but I finally got my hands on a 13900k and 4090. I just can't even begin to believe the massive leap in performance. I play on 3440x1440p
It is, the 4080 is barely 20% better than the 3090 and that is only if you play with DLSS 3.0 on... The 4090 is a monster of a card but also is his price, this card is just for enthusiast that wants the best of the best.
@@rakennavarro2557 When you compare new generational cards you compare to the exact same tier. So it wouldn't be the 4080 vs 3090. It would be 4080 vs 3080. That is what is fair. What you are seeing being compared here is, a 4090 and a 3090. So why would you even mention the 4080 competing with the 3090? (which is what the 4090 is competing with). That doesn't make sense... A 4080 beats a 3090 A 3080 beats a RTX Titan A 2080 beats an Titan XP It is usually by no more than 10% performance. So expect a 4080 16GB to beat the 3090 by around 10%.
@@rakennavarro2557 Uhm no? 4080 is 25-30% faster than the 3090 without any dlss. If the 4080 uses frame generation it crushes de 3090. Are u ok lil bud?
Nvidia: "Moore's Law is Dead" RTX 4090: 2 years and performance is doubled. That is exactly what Moore's Law looks like. Um... looks like Moore's Law is very much alive.
AAA gaming on high refresh rate ultrawides is becoming a very real possibility Let's hope it gets more affordable and game devs don't start slacking off on their optimisation (especially you, Cyberpunk guys) About the Cyberpunk results, since DLSS 3.0 is out for it people with 165Hz 1440p monitors might actually surpass the refresh rate in this game (depending on your CPU tho) im still stuck here broke on iris xe graphics struggling to play minecraft T-T I envy anyone who has a GPU but a big grats to those on 4090s you guys worked hard for that money I hope now enjoy
I know it would be tough to do because of boost tables, but you should do an IPC comparison as well, see how much actually they were able to gain architecturally and how much is just the higher clocks. Because from the results here the 4090 is looking more and more like an overclocked 3090
@@8Paul7 yes, I noticed that, valid point, but its some, not all, and besides, it's still something you never see with gpu reviews so i think it'd be a fun exercise
Nvidia also doubled performance with Kepler and Tesla.... The jump from Maxwell to Pascal was double, and Tesla was more than twice as fast as Curie. The 4090 is more like the Ada version of the GTX 780.... compare that to the GTX 580 which had the big boy GF110 GPU from the previous Generation. Kepler was so good that Nvidia used the GTX 600 series as a stopgap while waiting to release their full-fat GPU.
Considering this comment of yours is only a week old, Are you sure? I have seen every 6800 XT versus 3080 comparison Benchmark since they first released. The 6800 XT doesn't come anywhere close to the 3080. Not in regular rasterization and not in texture/resolution scaling (DLSS/FXR). Even on benchmark sites better globally renowned and proven to be accurate such as: *GPU USERBENCHMARK* clearly illustrate the 3080 is 12% faster minimally. I myself have a 3080 10 GB and when I post my pass Mark scores or any of my public benchmarks online the only people that come close to my scores are other 3080 owners and sometimes 6900xt owners.
The RTX 4090 is way faster and definitely worth it if you can afford it...the i9 12900k is also bottlenecking it so you could have used an overclocked 13900k at least
I found thse result very strange. Forza horizon 5, double the FPS with 10% more CPU usage (at most) You run DLSS with average 102fps in 4k with your 3090, I was about 35FPS ish less with my old 1080ti WITHOUT DLSS before upgrading to this money sinking RTX 4090. But the 3090 is at least 3x time my old 1080ti in raw stats. The DDR5 you are using, at 5600mhz. Idk if it's the issue... I'm running at Gear 1 at 4000mhz CL14-14-14-34 DDR4 memory. Your result may be better if you go all out at DDR5 7200mhz, you need to shorten the gap between timing and MHZ. 5600 just don't cut it.
$1500 vs $1600. Thats why you dont pay for this shit. They're playing the market, they could've easily given us 4090 performance in the 3090, but nope. They'll just save that huge leap for the next one and so on. However, that price tag will be set even higher. For $1600 you might as well build an entirely new rig, or pay your car note.
I was like almost double the performance so that's cool .... Then I realized that the 3090 is getting those FPSs on 4k 😱... Then told myself that I'm keeping my 3090 done I play on 1080/1440 depending on game lol
the only card from Nvidia that gives a huge performance boost over the last gen but cost 2 times more, so does that mean 5090 will be 2 times more than the 4090 msrp, this would change if Nvidia had more competition
better 4080 because frametime in 4090 is to bad,and 0.1 %low not is to good sometimes. Idk mine country 700usd,4090 3000usd... So is obvios what choose..
@@Bogdan00 triple A games are high budget games, they're made by big studios and offer graphical fidelity, go play the Witcher 3 with 1080ti at 4k and you'll see it's not even close to 60fps
Yes maybe a little. The RTX 4090 as can you see on FH5 for example, is only drawing 97-98% of its capabilities.. meaning that they have CPU bottlenecking by about 1-2%.. not really that big jump of performance if you upgrade it to 13th gen tho.. maybe gonna get a few more fps (single digit).
I just got a 3090oc for 880$ so yeah even if its double the performance one is cheaper and the other costs a kidney and let's be real, games like Doom Eternal which are well optimized you can get above 100fps with ultra native 4k, I've even seen this card playing Cyberpunk at 4k 100fps stable, for me it's enough, I don't really want to spend 5000$ for a pc.
I agree. Just got the evga 3090 and a ryzen 9 5900x to go along with it and it does everything I want. I got both of these a few months ago before Nvidia announced the 4090 and ryzen announced there new ryzen 9 7000 series cpu. Mg setup is overkill for most game I play currently (I play old games mostly)
4090 is only a beast because nvidia went from samsung's 8nm node which is a glorified 10nm node to 4N 5nm node from TSMC which is a lot better. they've practically done nothing except making the clockspeeds higher and add more cudacores because of the better node.
hmm... you people are making more sense 🤔 i feel like you guyz are employees in semiconductor factories. good knowledgeable people 😊👍 i get to learn a lot.
Hey! Also make a video on i5 12600k vs i5 13600k using a high-mid tier GPU such as rtx 3060ti or maybe rtx 3070 Would be delighted to see that review especially in 1080p gaming
Is DP1.4a not limited to 120hz max at 4k? Which means, despite the 4090 producing frames above 120 at 4k, the display will only receive 120 fps max at 4k. So how is the performance doubling then?
SLI died after the 20 the series. They saw that SLI ruined the performance of the 30s, and it took too much power. It wasn't very stable with the newfound power of the 30s so they never released it. It ended up actually dropping the FPS. But not saying you can't connect two 30s or 40s together. There are ways but, the system would draw most of its power from the first GPU. One would run at 90-99% while the other would run at 1-10% power. Also, if you ran two 40s you would need at least a 2k watt PSU. For 30s maybe a 1600 watt. Not worth it. At that point you are just building status not performance.
I just dont see much difference in output tho? Here people are selling 3090 at 700, I personally bagged 2 of em like year back at 800 each.. I think I am set for life for any GPU as such.. could run these 2 on SLI and beat 4090 right now ( if needed )
I have a MSI 3090 Ventus 3 and an 5950X. My Hardware still holds up atm. I plan to upgrade when Ryzen 8000 and the 50 Series is out. 2025 could be possible.
Alright but if we keep going like this in the future it wont matter anymore. There is almost no diiference between 250fps and 1000fps. So maybe 250fps is achieved by a rtx6090 and 1000fps by a 9090, you understand? Pay more for almost no difference.
So you can buy a 4090 for $2,500.00 CAD (in average as per a quick Amazon search) and the 3090 for $1,700.00 CAD. The question you should ask yourself before considering to buy a new graphics card is : is the 50 fps difference worth the price? On a game like Cyberpunk, there is definitely a plus value between 40 and 70 fps. But on most AAA games, the fps difference will not make a huge gameplay difference. You see the visual difference up until 60-70 fps but higher than that you won't see it. In conclusion, if you have the budget to afford a 3090 at $1,700.00 CAD, then you should maybe consider saving a few more hundred bucks to buy the 4090. It will probably take you 3-4 months of savings but it's definitely worth the price because although the fps difference between both cards will not be a game changer in most games in 2023, the 4090 will potentially have a higher lifespan. If you score 110-120 fps on most games today, you have a range to absorb fps drop in the next 2-3 years before you need to change your card if you want to continue playing on max settings in max resolution.
Then people still complaining about 40 series 😂 Mimimimimi 40 series bad cuz similar to My beloved 30 series mimimimimi nothing Will surpass the almighty 3050 mimimimimi 😭🤙
You have ray tracing turned on in nearly every benchmark clip. In order to know how fast the actual card is we need to see ray tracing turned off for full rasterization performance. I've compiled all the data available comparing the 3090 and 4090 using side-by-side with no ray tracing. The rasterization difference in performance is, the 4090 is averaging a 70% performance gain over the 3090.
I got my 3090 last week for 700CAD, Im just surprised how hot it runs, it heats up my room by degrees after 1-2 hours of gaming. Even idle the power draw is more than my 3060 was under load!
DLSS 4K is not 4K! Please don't use DLSS in performance tests. If you want to test DLSS, make a DLSS video! We're here to see real 4K performance. 5 of the 9 games in this video weren't even running at native 4K!
It is crasy card. But also senseless. It is powerfull but super expensive, and also, do we realy need 150 + fps for single player games? And how many people realy playing games 4K NOT in 60 Hz? RTX 3090 still the best variant. Also we must not support Nvidia with such prices. Gaming MUST NO be so expensive (actually all Nvidia prices for 4000 is SUPER HIGH). As for this generation RTX 3000 or AMD 6000-7000 series is the best for all 3-5 years.
and $2,200 is cheap!! In the US the 4090 usually goes for $4000 because its the country of scalpers and conmen. Imagine paying extra $2,400 for just 30 more unstable frames!!
Because it has to handle 50% to 80% more FPS. Limit the game in both cases to the same amount of FPS, and you will have the same utilization as well as power draw.
What's the difference between a £550 PS5 that's also capable of 4k at 60fps, or 120fps at 1440p?..without major changes in the settings being downgraded..Compared to the 30 series GPUs? Doesn't seem like a reasonable upgrade, especially when it costs several times more
Ps5 runs most triple A games at internal resolution of sub 1080p to achieve 60fps and sub 1440p to achieve 30 fps. Those 4k and 1440p marketing are completely misleading, they are all upscaled resolution. Do your research buddy. Maybe want to watch digital foundry tech reviews. Any 3000 series cards like the 3060ti or higher get better fps in games if ran at ps5 settings
@@dhaumya23gango75 that's a load of shit. I've seen native 4k games at 60fps. For intense games. The res drops to about 1440p maintaining 60fps. The only time it's below 1440p is when it's 120fps. You can still lock 1440p but then 120fps dips slightly. Gran Turismo is an example.
Games :
Forza Horizon 5 - 0:20 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
God of War - 1:32 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesGoWPC
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 2:14 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Hitman 3 - 3:13 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesHitman3
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 3:59 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Horizon Zero Dawn - 5:10 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesH0D
Uncharted LoTC - 6:08
Spider-Man - 7:28 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesSpiderManPC
Dying Light 2 - 8:24 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesDL2
System:
Windows 10 Pro
Core i9-12900K - bit.ly/3H4waEv
MSI MPG Z690 Force - bit.ly/3GVTNi6
32Gb RAM DDR5 5600Mhz - bit.ly/3BOxlni
CPU Cooler - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 - bit.ly/35G5atV
GeForce RTX 3090 24GB - bit.ly/3kNDiZM
GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
Broooooo
Whats the name of your case??????
Please answer my question......
Where is old games of 2 years difference?
Where is
MIDDLE EARTH SHADOW OF WAR?
WITCHER 3?
Theirs no way you’re getting 40 fps with a 3090 if I’m getting 30-50 fps with my gaming laptop with a 3070 ultra settings and psycho raytracing on Cyberpunk. Theirs something wrong here.
In Italy the 3090 costs 1100 $, the 4090 starts at 2000 $ for the founders edition and from 2500 $ for the custom. So you get x1.75 performance for x 2.3 price
but thats a highend card you cant compare that... you dont play games double as fast... you can just get e.g. the resolution from 1440p to 2160p with same fps so its bit better visual quality but is it worth that prize? you can get same fps with a 3060ti on 1080p
Well I snagged a 4090 for 1599.99 on release day here in the U.S but. 2000 for a 4090 is just not worth it
In Ukraine you can by 3090 just for 800 - 850 dollars when 4090 for 1700-1800. Its more than double price in our country.......
@@crazywall256 In my country singapore the following RTX 4090 models cost above SGD $3000, quoting the list from my local shop. That is equivalent to about $2400++ in USD dollars. Freaking insane. You are lucky to purchase it at 1599.99 in USD.
TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 OC Edition 24GB GDDR6X - SGD $3209
ROG Strix GeForce RTX® 4090 OC Edition 24GB GDDR6X - SGD $3429
@@BravoSixGoingDark complete rip off
70-95% more performance at the same power draw. That is really impressive!
If we ignore the price, then yeah, that's very impressive.
@@mhnoniIndeed. I didn't ignore the price and bought a 6950xt :)
70-95% more performance for 70-95% more price
@@Universeverse923 Haha, true :D And comparing the 4090 to my purchase of the 6950xt (3090 performance) it's 70-95% more performance for 200-230% more price!! A reasonable price for a 4090 should be not more than 1200 bucks.
😂😂@@mhnoni
There was a couple spots where even the 4090 stuttered with Cyber Punk. That game needs some serious optimization work.
frl
Fans are particularly to blame there was a pretty good sized hate mob pushing for the game to come out still mai ly on cdpr they should have been honest and just been like look the game handels like shit were gonna hold it for a year and get it working
Game is pretty well optimized as of today btw.
@Peter ehh, that's debatable it diffently plays better and is less buggy, but given its graphics out side of ray tracing it could still use so.e work
@@D00ML0RD1 WRONG LOL cdpr wanted the pre order profits lol nobody forced them to release the game they did it themselves.
In other words. The 4090 is a massively faster card but the 3090 is more than adequate in all but a few select games. I'd like to see a VR performance comparison.
The 4090 is more power efficient as well, so you pay for research & development too.Also, I dont see you complaining about iphones being overpriced as well despite offering less lmao
@@GamingIntelCoreM-y Iphones are massively overpriced for what they are, particularly any 'new' version that has some minor change nobody needs for some stupid additional cost. Needless to say I do not have an Iphone (and no, not because I couldn't afford it)
@@Mutrino the world disagrees with you since iphones are the #1 selling phone. 1.36 billion people own an iphone (according to google). If it was "overpriced" people wouldn't buy it. Iphone has the fastest chips, best cameras, most polished os, and amazing battery life. No other phone checks all those boxes, sure some niche android phone might have a giant 999 megapixel camera that's slightly better than an iphone camera but it's gonna be garbage in every other category. As someone who used to own a samsung galaxy phone, I can say that iphones are just better. They're expensive, but they're not "overpriced" relatively speaking when comparing to the competition. The added "freedom" or "customization" of an android phone is useless for most people. Obviously this is my opinion, but the market agrees with me.
Same thing with Nvidia. Nvidia is basically the apple of the gpu world.
@@ilovehotdogs125790 I disagree with your statement. 'If it was overpriced people wouldn't buy it'. That is simply not true. I am not saying iphones are 'bad' phones. They are certainly good phones. But it is nonsense to say that they always win in every category. Simply not true. When you start comparing the flagship phones the Samsung galaxy phones are superior to the Iphones when it comes to battery life and cameras. 'Better' very much depends on your use scenario. As an example, for my use case a windows machine is far superior to a Mac. And when it comes to stupid fast chips, cool, most people don't need/use that either. Iphones are stupid expensive to repair but do keep their value better. So overall, certainly not the clear win for Iphones you make it out to be. It very much depends.
@@GamingIntelCoreM-ywhat did iphones have to do with anything
Great comparison video I just recently bought a 3090 right before the 4090 came out because it was at a good price. The fact that you are getting close to 100 FPS at 4K with a 3090 is really reassuring considering that I game at 1440p which will give me more than enough FPS at ultra settings
Hey, I plan on purchasing a 3090 ti also, what CpU would you recommend? I was thinking about purchasing a 12700k but not sure if I should get a 12900k or a 13th gen. The 12900k and 13th gen run really hot so If I go with those I would have to upgrade my AIO. I plan on gaming at 1440 p and sometimes 4k.
@@dusk3219 for gaming only many even recommend the 12600k and I have seen it's performance in many reviews, it holds up well. But for me as my recently built machine was also a work station so I opted for the 12700k, it's a great CPU and was a good choice for me. So I think you're pretty safe going with the 12700k, the 12900k has a good performance boost but if you don't run any other workloads than gaming then I think it might be overkill esp with power consumption and then the obvious price difference. Same goes for the 13th gen, I watched some reviews they are a great performance boost and the same 13700k has a lot of boost over 12700k but then again the downside - power consumption has been increased and then comes the price, I say if Money is not a problem you can go for the 13700k heck even the 13600k as its gaming performance is close to the 12900k !
@@CovertPhilosopher Thanks man, this was reassuring! Could you define “workloads”? I mainly plan on gaming. I have a dual monitor setup where I normally watch a show, movie, anime or RUclips on my second monitor all while gaming. Nothing too major. My PC would purely be for entertainment for now. Money is very tight at the moment so If I could save money by going with a 12700k that’s what I would love to do! But if I need to upgrade I would. So you think I should go with the 12700k? Also I was wondering does a 3090 ti *need* to be water cooled to be efficient ? When I look up best coolers for 3090 ti, see people using water cooling as a solution. Does it really run that hot? Could I just use fans to cool it? I don’t plan on OC my gpu. Sorry to bombard you with a bunch of questions but this is my first pc build
@@dusk3219 sorry for the late reply, so by workloads I meant specific tasks that hog the CPU with or without the GPU in use. Like some programs that require processing or calculations a lot and also multi threaded usage, for me that could be development related usage based on running of processor n memory heavy programs. For your use case I think your pretty good as it's only for entertainment purposes but opening multiple apps alongside like you intend I would recommend getting a minimum of 16gb ram. As for the CPU i think the i7 12700K would be solid for you, not advocating as I have it, I think it will future proof you a bit too, and talking about the future - yes when buying myself I checked out the upcoming sockets, so your 12th gen board will support the 13th gen but beyond that like for the 14 or 15 gen yes you will need a new board but that is us looking too far down the road. So I think yes if money is a constraint just go for the 12th gen on either the 12600 or the 12700k, hope this helps.
And as for the GPU, air coolers run just fine, though keep in mind while looking for one find a GPU from an AIB preferably which has good reviews and esp on cooling. As for the comparisons yes the water cooled rigs are more efficient but require more maintenance, air cooled CPU and GPU always have a longer life according to experts and provide decent enough cooling. But - if you don't want a mini heater in your room dishing out so much hot air and that heat is of a major concern to you then by all means go for the liquid cooler, just bear in mind that the RnD should be thorough and that you buy something that best suits you and has a good overall life.
P.S. I also did my first ever build after decades recently so I got to know some stuff :)
@@CovertPhilosopher No problem! Better than no reply at all! Bro you made my day with this reply. Ive been frustrated for weeks trying to figure out the best specs for my needs and budget and the internet was not helpful whatsoever. You’re literally carrying my PC build and I really appreciate you. Now, I plan on doing 32 g of ram from either kingston fury or corsair, but I’m not sure if I should get ddr4 or ddr5… I should have a compatible motherboard for 5 but I’ve heard about ddr5 being not worth the upgrade and ddr4 outperforming 5 or something like that, I haven’t done much research. What do you think
It appears there really is some big Jumps in Performance from just 2 Years ago. Some are Double the Performance.
dlss is on , if he turn it off , there is only 30% difference
None of them doubled the performance
All of that for almost double the price. What next? 3200 dollar for twice as fast?
@@Alone_son without dlss its still 50%+ better
It doubles the performance of the 3090 Ti in some games.
Disclaimer, No 4090 caught on fire or was sacrificed to make this video
In many games, the 0.1% lows of the 4090 are higher than the avg of the 3090, now that's impressive. I hope this kind of performance increase will at least somwhat be inherited by the lower tier cards too...
Lol no ad103/104 IS cut as fuck.
Hey, hi, I'm from the future. Soooo, about that...
hahaha.. haha.. ha..
@@wassabee9174came to say this lol
Aged like milk
The RTX 4090 is around 50%-80% faster than the RTX 3090, whilst consuming around 10% higher power (or in other reviews 30% higher). In price to performance comparison the RTX 4090 is 1599$ and the 3090 is around 900$, so I would say it's pretty balanced. With all of those metrics I would say if you want the absolute top end, best of the best gpu, the RTX 4090 is for you, but the RTX 3090 and RX 6900 XT is still a good choice. If you don't want to pay 1600$ for a gpu, just wait for the RX 7000 series. On the other hand, those gpu releases will definitely affect the prices of GPU in lower tier models, so for us low- mid range gamers, this is the right time to buy a gpu.
In Finland I got 3090ti for 1000, meanwhile same tier 4090 is 2500. I was gonna get 4090 but the pricing is insane in here for some reason sadly
No, no está equilibrado
I got 2080Ti in March 2020 for 1600$
Stop promote AMD
No one in 'the Know' is going to touch the 4090 right now due to issues with the 12vhpwr connector. This has been dominating the hardware news for the last couple of days. Poor scalpers! I really feel sorry for the people that bought this card.... the EARLY ADOPTERS TAX is a btch sometimes. This is the main reason why people always say to wait a couple months.
People who spend that kind of money on a card don't care much about the Price to performance ratios. Remember at launch the 3090 was nearly double the price of the 3080 while only offering 10% more performance. Then people tried to bill the 3090 as a Poor Man's workstation card. I can't really think of too many xx80, xx80ti, xx90, or Titan cards that were a good value in comparison to lower tier cards.
For most games the .1% low is kinda strange with the 4090. I wonder if that will be resolved with drivers or if it doesn't pose any real world issues.
it’s amazing how efficient the 4090 is at getting like 1.8x performance out of more or less the same power
4090 is a beast at 4k! let's see if AMD will come up with something to match!
From what the leaks have been insinuating, I'd say AMD has multiple beasts to offer up against the 4090 and the upcoming 4090ti.
@@joshuapicarello (X) Doubt
@@Cupapet93 AMD did back up most of these claims stating performance has been beyond previous expectations, so who knows. Is it possible? Of course. But am I personally expecting it? Can't make a judgement call until I see early benchmarking leaks.
100% AMD definitely building a monster of a card.
@@Cupapet93 You keep doubting but you'll see on November 3rd when AMD showcases the 7900 XT.
Андрей, Спасибо, что продолжаете радовать тестами, как всегда жирный лайк!
Есть один вопрос! А будет в дальнейшем стоит жадать? видео с 13900k + 4090 в разных играх в сравнение 1080/1440/4k
(знаю такое есть видео 8 дней назад выходило, но оно в сравнение с 12900k). Хотелось бы сравнить разницу в 3 разрешениях с уже вышедшим флагманом от intel. ну или хотя было бы круто сделать только два разрешения 2/4K.
Офигеть, я не знал, что это наш парень ролики делает 😄
Considering you can get a slightly used 3090 for almost a third the price, the uplift in performance doesnt seem worth it. I’m currently running a 3090, and i’m going to wait for the 5080/5090
Yesss worth the wait
What I would say is wait for the 5000 series then buy a 4090 much cheaper
Rtx5080-rtx5080ti .
I'm late to the party, but I finally got my hands on a 13900k and 4090. I just can't even begin to believe the massive leap in performance. I play on 3440x1440p
fps difference and dlss3.0 & av1 codec, i think its worth it
Didn't expect to see my beloved Ziblacking here
but still don't have display port 2.0 😑
@@prabhakardhar1379 tf you gonna do with dp 2.0?
16k 60hz huh
Those who are crying about dp 2 are naive and dumb
true dlss3 and framegen are what make 4000 series expensive, and they do look good w nice fps increase
Man it's cool to see the top end get such a big jump BUT I have a feeling it's gonna be disappointing at the mid-high end segment
It is, the 4080 is barely 20% better than the 3090 and that is only if you play with DLSS 3.0 on...
The 4090 is a monster of a card but also is his price, this card is just for enthusiast that wants the best of the best.
@@rakennavarro2557 When you compare new generational cards you compare to the exact same tier. So it wouldn't be the 4080 vs 3090. It would be 4080 vs 3080. That is what is fair.
What you are seeing being compared here is, a 4090 and a 3090. So why would you even mention the 4080 competing with the 3090? (which is what the 4090 is competing with). That doesn't make sense...
A 4080 beats a 3090
A 3080 beats a RTX Titan
A 2080 beats an Titan XP
It is usually by no more than 10% performance. So expect a 4080 16GB to beat the 3090 by around 10%.
@@rakennavarro2557 4080 review states it's roughly 35% faster then a 3090 and +20% over 90 Ti. ~1.55x over 3080 but still price is insane
@@rakennavarro2557 Uhm no? 4080 is 25-30% faster than the 3090 without any dlss. If the 4080 uses frame generation it crushes de 3090. Are u ok lil bud?
You were right 😅
Only reason to get 4090 is to game at 4k comfortably, otherwise does not make sense at even msrp which is a myth in most countries at the moment
And for VR, just saying
Or high FPS for gaming in 1440p for the next 8 years xD AAnnnd the 24 gb Vram.
Nvidia: "Moore's Law is Dead"
RTX 4090: 2 years and performance is doubled. That is exactly what Moore's Law looks like.
Um... looks like Moore's Law is very much alive.
Moore's Law says nothing about performance.
I can't wait to be able to purchase stuff like this when it comes out and not worry about it
we'll get there one day
Thanks for all your tests! They do really help a lot! 🙏
AAA gaming on high refresh rate ultrawides is becoming a very real possibility
Let's hope it gets more affordable and game devs don't start slacking off on their optimisation (especially you, Cyberpunk guys)
About the Cyberpunk results, since DLSS 3.0 is out for it people with 165Hz 1440p monitors might actually surpass the refresh rate in this game (depending on your CPU tho)
im still stuck here broke on iris xe graphics struggling to play minecraft T-T
I envy anyone who has a GPU but a big grats to those on 4090s you guys worked hard for that money I hope now enjoy
as long you turn down rt,very true,not sure dlss3 is real high refresh rate,since ppl say that 100 fps dlss3 feels like 60 raw fps
This aged good
Forza - 96% faster
GOW - 64%
RDR - 73%
HITMAN - 80%
Cyberpunk - 78%
HZD - 52%
UC - 60%
SpiderMan - 66%
DL 2 - 86%
Sony titles have the worse jump in performance
well they were optimized for amd hardware
I know it would be tough to do because of boost tables, but you should do an IPC comparison as well, see how much actually they were able to gain architecturally and how much is just the higher clocks. Because from the results here the 4090 is looking more and more like an overclocked 3090
Not really, in some games it posts almost twice the performance, so if it was based on clocks, it would have to run 4ghz
@@8Paul7 yes, I noticed that, valid point, but its some, not all, and besides, it's still something you never see with gpu reviews so i think it'd be a fun exercise
Difference without DLSS will be less. I consider testing with DLSS to be a flaw.
Almost double the price and almost double the performance. Quite interesting
fairplay for nvidia
well 3090 released for 1500 so launch price/performance leap is incredible.
@@gauravnegi4312 That's if you ignore the 3080 at 700$.
Nvidia also doubled performance with Kepler and Tesla.... The jump from Maxwell to Pascal was double, and Tesla was more than twice as fast as Curie. The 4090 is more like the Ada version of the GTX 780.... compare that to the GTX 580 which had the big boy GF110 GPU from the previous Generation. Kepler was so good that Nvidia used the GTX 600 series as a stopgap while waiting to release their full-fat GPU.
TG please always add flight sim, it's a very useful test. You're like the only channel that always adds it most of the time.
Fucking ridiculous what happend when pascal was the shit and prices where decent
Did you test newer games?
4090 is insanly good, but the price, the size, no DP 2.0 and power cable problem stopping me from getting one.
What are u smoking, the 4090 has 3x DP and 1x HDMI ports.
Got 3090 just for 430$ it's a beast
damn WTF WHERE
@@w9s992 Saudi arabia
@@OFTechh insane deal
@@w9s992 i know right got really lucky
Can you do new CPU tests on different windows ver? New Ryzens and 13Gen Intel on Windows 10 vs Windows 11 ??
I have 3090 and feels like my PC already obsolete
I got my hands on a RX 6800 recently. With SAM and OC, it get to the level of an 3080, or at least very very close. Its perfectly fine for 1440p
Considering this comment of yours is only a week old, Are you sure? I have seen every 6800 XT versus 3080 comparison Benchmark since they first released. The 6800 XT doesn't come anywhere close to the 3080. Not in regular rasterization and not in texture/resolution scaling (DLSS/FXR).
Even on benchmark sites better globally renowned and proven to be accurate such as: *GPU USERBENCHMARK* clearly illustrate the 3080 is 12% faster minimally.
I myself have a 3080 10 GB and when I post my pass Mark scores or any of my public benchmarks online the only people that come close to my scores are other 3080 owners and sometimes 6900xt owners.
@@asmongoldsmouth9839 is it still that far off difference even with what he said overclock?
@@asmongoldsmouth9839"renowed" "userbenchmark" LMAO
This is Insanely Insane It's like it's two different PCs with completely different specs... Wow!
The RTX 4090 is way faster and definitely worth it if you can afford it...the i9 12900k is also bottlenecking it so you could have used an overclocked 13900k at least
this reminds me of 980ti - 1080ti lol. performance jump was huge
true but 1080ti was very affordable back then, like 1000$ and 1080 was like 750$, unlike these nowadays prices
Nice, now test it without DLSS.
I found thse result very strange. Forza horizon 5, double the FPS with 10% more CPU usage (at most)
You run DLSS with average 102fps in 4k with your 3090, I was about 35FPS ish less with my old 1080ti WITHOUT DLSS before upgrading to this money sinking RTX 4090. But the 3090 is at least 3x time my old 1080ti in raw stats.
The DDR5 you are using, at 5600mhz. Idk if it's the issue... I'm running at Gear 1 at 4000mhz CL14-14-14-34 DDR4 memory. Your result may be better if you go all out at DDR5 7200mhz, you need to shorten the gap between timing and MHZ. 5600 just don't cut it.
$1500 vs $1600. Thats why you dont pay for this shit. They're playing the market, they could've easily given us 4090 performance in the 3090, but nope. They'll just save that huge leap for the next one and so on. However, that price tag will be set even higher. For $1600 you might as well build an entirely new rig, or pay your car note.
me comparing 100 and 200 fps difference review in 60hz screen
🤣🤣
even if you had a 360hz you wont see any difference. RUclips videos are max 60FPS
Just got my 4090, just waiting on the 13900k and other components to arrive.
Where did you find the $900 3090, I’m looking for one?
По графике есть разница? Думаю менять или нет. У меня моник 2к пока что.
I was like almost double the performance so that's cool .... Then I realized that the 3090 is getting those FPSs on 4k 😱... Then told myself that I'm keeping my 3090 done I play on 1080/1440 depending on game lol
30 series looks horrible in comparison. This looks like the same difference we had going from 900 series to 10xx series
look the same, the difference is the number of frames
Is this with or without DLSS enabled ?
using dlss. pointless test
RTX 3090: 2 YEARS AND STILL WORKING
RTX 4090: 2 WEEKS AND BURNT POWER CABLES
🤣🤣🤣🤣 This is gold!! I own a 3080 but man this is hilarious.
You think windows 10 is better than 11 for gaming?
Why do you put random prices instead of launch price advertised by the company?
the only card from Nvidia that gives a huge performance boost over the last gen but cost 2 times more, so does that mean 5090 will be 2 times more than the 4090 msrp, this would change if Nvidia had more competition
better 4080 because frametime in 4090 is to bad,and 0.1 %low not is to good sometimes.
Idk mine country 700usd,4090 3000usd... So is obvios what choose..
We have never seen an uplift like thos from flagships legit ever.
let's not talk about the price, look at the power efficiency :) with the same power usage, the RTX 4090 can produce 2 times the performance
When you can get 4k 300Hz + I'll consider upgrading my 3090 and monitor, until then i'll stay at 1440p 280Hz.
What is your oc I have a rtx 3090.
@@davidfelix3851 I'm using the Founders Edition with no OC.
Goodness me, I remember when GTX 1080ti came out people were excited for 4k 30 fps.
4090 is crazy fast
Qué tiene que ver Dios
GTX 1080Ti can play at 4K 60FPS.
@@alibarznji2000 What? Triple A game is a genre, that has nothing to do with hardware requirements... GTA V is a triple A game for example
@@Bogdan00 triple A games are high budget games, they're made by big studios and offer graphical fidelity, go play the Witcher 3 with 1080ti at 4k and you'll see it's not even close to 60fps
@@alibarznji2000 what did you smoke? the 1080ti is way higher than 60fps in witcher 3
If the OP had an I9 13900k, it would make any difference in thoose numbers? Or will will see the difference only on lower resolutions? TY, btw!
Yes maybe a little. The RTX 4090 as can you see on FH5 for example, is only drawing 97-98% of its capabilities.. meaning that they have CPU bottlenecking by about 1-2%.. not really that big jump of performance if you upgrade it to 13th gen tho.. maybe gonna get a few more fps (single digit).
I just got a 3090oc for 880$ so yeah even if its double the performance one is cheaper and the other costs a kidney and let's be real, games like Doom Eternal which are well optimized you can get above 100fps with ultra native 4k, I've even seen this card playing Cyberpunk at 4k 100fps stable, for me it's enough, I don't really want to spend 5000$ for a pc.
I agree. Just got the evga 3090 and a ryzen 9 5900x to go along with it and it does everything I want. I got both of these a few months ago before Nvidia announced the 4090 and ryzen announced there new ryzen 9 7000 series cpu. Mg setup is overkill for most game I play currently (I play old games mostly)
In Australia they cost the same price on release
Have to admit, that is a huge difference and I reckon worth it's price because that's legit what you are paying for
Great vids!!! Love your content!!!♥️👍👍👍👍
4090 is only a beast because nvidia went from samsung's 8nm node which is a glorified 10nm node to 4N 5nm node from TSMC which is a lot better. they've practically done nothing except making the clockspeeds higher and add more cudacores because of the better node.
hmm... you people are making more sense 🤔
i feel like you guyz are employees in semiconductor factories. good knowledgeable people 😊👍 i get to learn a lot.
Cool, you got one right this time
Why use DLSS on most of these games? It should be just raw rasterization performance.
Hey!
Also make a video on i5 12600k vs i5 13600k using a high-mid tier GPU such as rtx 3060ti or maybe rtx 3070
Would be delighted to see that review especially in 1080p gaming
That kind of video would make too much sense
Is DP1.4a not limited to 120hz max at 4k? Which means, despite the 4090 producing frames above 120 at 4k, the display will only receive 120 fps max at 4k. So how is the performance doubling then?
The card also have HDMI 2.1, which supports 4K up to 165Hz.
why is the CPU loaded 1.5x times more when using the 4090?
Pushing more frames
cant wait to get mine next week!
Good luck setting your power connector on fire
@@bretttanton328 starting to get a bit chilly so will definitely help
@@Taima_the_lion 💀
I'd check out the 12VHPWR connector problem before plugging that sucker into your system.
@@m8x425 already have, just going to wait for the cable mod 90 degree adapter but my case is pretty big to where I don’t have to bend the cables
If you pair 2x 3090 will it perform better?
SLI died after the 20 the series. They saw that SLI ruined the performance of the 30s, and it took too much power. It wasn't very stable with the newfound power of the 30s so they never released it. It ended up actually dropping the FPS. But not saying you can't connect two 30s or 40s together. There are ways but, the system would draw most of its power from the first GPU. One would run at 90-99% while the other would run at 1-10% power. Also, if you ran two 40s you would need at least a 2k watt PSU. For 30s maybe a 1600 watt. Not worth it. At that point you are just building status not performance.
I just dont see much difference in output tho? Here people are selling 3090 at 700, I personally bagged 2 of em like year back at 800 each.. I think I am set for life for any GPU as such.. could run these 2 on SLI and beat 4090 right now ( if needed )
SLI 😂😂😂😂
@@rust2156 Bet you got 4090 @ 2k which is getting hammered
I have a MSI 3090 Ventus 3 and an 5950X. My Hardware still holds up atm. I plan to upgrade when Ryzen 8000 and the 50 Series is out. 2025 could be possible.
Why not with 13900K or 7950X?
I guess I will wait for the 5090 in 2024
Напоминаю! Включённый dlss это требование Nvidia! Вам просто продают новую технологию, и всё. Это очень смешно на таких картах включать её :)
Alright but if we keep going like this in the future it wont matter anymore. There is almost no diiference between 250fps and 1000fps. So maybe 250fps is achieved by a rtx6090 and 1000fps by a 9090, you understand? Pay more for almost no difference.
Absolutely 👌💯
higher graphical fidelity? its not always about the fps and resolution you know. i can probably run a ps2 game at 2000+fps with a 4090
So you can buy a 4090 for $2,500.00 CAD (in average as per a quick Amazon search) and the 3090 for $1,700.00 CAD. The question you should ask yourself before considering to buy a new graphics card is : is the 50 fps difference worth the price? On a game like Cyberpunk, there is definitely a plus value between 40 and 70 fps. But on most AAA games, the fps difference will not make a huge gameplay difference. You see the visual difference up until 60-70 fps but higher than that you won't see it. In conclusion, if you have the budget to afford a 3090 at $1,700.00 CAD, then you should maybe consider saving a few more hundred bucks to buy the 4090. It will probably take you 3-4 months of savings but it's definitely worth the price because although the fps difference between both cards will not be a game changer in most games in 2023, the 4090 will potentially have a higher lifespan. If you score 110-120 fps on most games today, you have a range to absorb fps drop in the next 2-3 years before you need to change your card if you want to continue playing on max settings in max resolution.
Then people still complaining about 40 series 😂
Mimimimimi 40 series bad cuz similar to My beloved 30 series mimimimimi nothing Will surpass the almighty 3050 mimimimimi
😭🤙
Did RDR2 have MSAA x8 enabled?
You have ray tracing turned on in nearly every benchmark clip. In order to know how fast the actual card is we need to see ray tracing turned off for full rasterization performance.
I've compiled all the data available comparing the 3090 and 4090 using side-by-side with no ray tracing. The rasterization difference in performance is, the 4090 is averaging a 70% performance gain over the 3090.
Definitely buying a used 3090 for 1/2 the price.
I got my 3090 last week for 700CAD, Im just surprised how hot it runs, it heats up my room by degrees after 1-2 hours of gaming. Even idle the power draw is more than my 3060 was under load!
@@VFXShawn you need to redo the thermal paste make sure you get some good quality stuff
@@VFXShawn As someone that's been running a 3090 since Dec 12th 2020, I've not suffered the same issue, not even close.
Taken inflation into consideration they were released for the same price. It's nice to see such a big jump in performance.
DLSS 4K is not 4K! Please don't use DLSS in performance tests. If you want to test DLSS, make a DLSS video! We're here to see real 4K performance. 5 of the 9 games in this video weren't even running at native 4K!
this bench with dlss 3 on ?
3090 - $1000 USD
4090 -$1600 USD
Forza Horizon: 96% fps < 4090
God of War: 64% < 4090
Red Dead 2: 73% < 4090
Hitman 3: 80% < 4090
Cyberpunk 2077: 78% < 4090
Horizon Dawn: 52% < 4090
Uncharted: 60% < 4090
Spiderman: 66% < 4090
Dying Light 2: 86%
Where is last Metro and Crysis?
And this is why I don't care about vram it's all about the strength of the core
It is crasy card.
But also senseless. It is powerfull but super expensive, and also, do we realy need 150 + fps for single player games?
And how many people realy playing games 4K NOT in 60 Hz?
RTX 3090 still the best variant. Also we must not support Nvidia with such prices. Gaming MUST NO be so expensive (actually all Nvidia prices for 4000 is SUPER HIGH).
As for this generation RTX 3000 or AMD 6000-7000 series is the best for all 3-5 years.
All of these games dont need wifi so how are you testing the peek performance
1000€ more to see absolutely no difference. #nice.
Absolutely no difference? Need to have your eyes examined then.
I update from 3090 to 4090 FE during Launch i am very happy. My suggestion is if you got money buy it but now in 2024 no just wait for 5090
Is this 4k?
2200 usd for 4090 in norway.
1600 usd for 3090
and $2,200 is cheap!! In the US the 4090 usually goes for $4000 because its the country of scalpers and conmen. Imagine paying extra $2,400 for just 30 more unstable frames!!
I don't find any difference.. Even 3050 is good no need to spend so much money
The I9 is more used ( 20 to 40 % ) with the 4090 . Crazy
Just mean its software build in 4090
Because it has to handle 50% to 80% more FPS. Limit the game in both cases to the same amount of FPS, and you will have the same utilization as well as power draw.
I feel like rtx 4090 is a gtx 1080 of 2023
why is it not absolutely maxxed? Whats this with the medium shit and the 3/4 sliders? Bro.
Not paying for windows bud, but I appreciate the offer.
Hey, at least it's cheaper than paying full price for the O S. The only reason pcpartpicker exists is to sell copies of Windows for a C-Note or two.
Solid 80 fps jump on Hitman 3 😬
What's the difference between a £550 PS5 that's also capable of 4k at 60fps, or 120fps at 1440p?..without major changes in the settings being downgraded..Compared to the 30 series GPUs?
Doesn't seem like a reasonable upgrade, especially when it costs several times more
Ps5 runs most triple A games at internal resolution of sub 1080p to achieve 60fps and sub 1440p to achieve 30 fps. Those 4k and 1440p marketing are completely misleading, they are all upscaled resolution. Do your research buddy. Maybe want to watch digital foundry tech reviews. Any 3000 series cards like the 3060ti or higher get better fps in games if ran at ps5 settings
@@dhaumya23gango75 that's a load of shit.
I've seen native 4k games at 60fps. For intense games. The res drops to about 1440p maintaining 60fps. The only time it's below 1440p is when it's 120fps. You can still lock 1440p but then 120fps dips slightly. Gran Turismo is an example.
I dont know why you guys talking about price here, buyers of these cards dont give a bs about money
something is not right here. these numbers dont make sense and i own both 3090ti and the 4090