(No disrespect I just come here a lot and need this) 2:34 - *Draw Mask* & *Keyframe* so it covers the whole clip (Extra room is Fine) 4:34 - *Mode* > *Subtract* 4:54 - *Content Aware Fill Tool* Tips: 7:09 - *Feather Mask* to help with Jagged Edges 8:44 - Create a *Reference Frame*
That's not how you modify the work area, you just zoomed in your timeline. The bracket you had grabbed first was the correct one (6:28). You can also use the shortcuts B and N to set the beginning and the end of the work area.
Josh is using the Beta version, folks. The standard version in the 17.5.1 update doesn't have the "lighting correction" dropdown menu as part of the CAF panel.
This is impressive but I think it probably only works this good in shots with natural landscapes which are random - I wonder if you tried this in an industrial setting like a factory where there are lots of straight lines if it would work at all - just curious, I'm not even a PC user but the technology is interesting
This is extremely handy, thank you! A conceptual question for you... so in your second shot you have a doggo running. When the doggo is in the right side of the frame, the left side is "empty"... so when the doggo moves to the left side later on in the clip is it possible that the CAF is using the "left-side empty" frames from earlier in the clip to fill in the space? Also, does the CAF only work with locked-down/tripod shots, or does it merely work BETTER with tripod shots--in your experience? Thank you!
This is amazing but what happens when the object you're removing becomes obscurred or moved off screen? What do I do with the mask at that point? It remains and content aware keeps filling the mask. ?
Kinda wish we got to see how this works on a shot that would actually need content aware fill to take the object out. For both these shots, to get the same results one could just duplicate the clip to v2, mask out the objects that need to be removed, feather those masks, then move the clip on the bottom over juust enough frames for the guy and/or dog to never cross through the area of the mask in the clip above it. TL;DR: Content aware fill is cool because it has the potential to create clean slates for shots which don't have them. Both the shots here have clean plates in the shot already, therefore CAF wasn't needed. PS: That being said, there are sooo many tutorials that will go through drop down menu options without explaining what any of them do except for the one they wanted to use for their very specific scenario and Josh clearly took the time to give us all that info. The value of this can't be overstated. PSS: honestly I bet if the parts of the title on either side of the " | " were swapped, I wouldn't have made this comment
Wish you could add a reference video or frame, instead of creating one. Like, say I shot a clip without the object prior. I'm thinking of wire removal specifically.
Nice :D So either the subject or camera or both have to be moving I assume. The second one when you removed the dog, if you had tried to remove the person near the tree that wasn't moving and the camera isn't moving I suspect Content Aware would not be able to do it.
Those shots don't need CAF at all. If you have a static camera and a more or less static background, and all of the background is shown throughout the entire clip's length. this can be easily done with 2 freeze frames and 2 rough masks in a fraction of the time you spent on this. Especially the second shot, where there is no visual movement in the BG. CAF is needed when there is no easy way to get this done by hand, i.e. moving camera and always obscured parts of the BG. I'd love to see this feature shown with a more reasonable difficult shot. Right now, this feels like a lame demo of the feature, and I expect it to fall apart with every shot where it may actually be needed. Will have to play around with it myself then.
Hi ! Amazing video !! However, I got a problem... When I generate a fill layer, the layer appears black and doesn't fill at all... does anyone has a solution ?...
Do you mean when creating a mask, it doesn't appear in the content-aware fill window? If so, I had the same problem and I tried hiding everything else except the layer to generate the fill and it worked! Hope this helps!
hi there great tutorial im on windows 10 pro latest version adobe effects, tried masking im not getting the masking options to subtract the handels any ideas? am stuck
A glowing advertisement for Adobe, that appears within an another advertisement for Envato Elements. I'm sure RUclips motion graphic tutors would claim this is necessary for their economic survival. In any case, a truer description of Adobe's Content Aware Fill for AE is that is when applied to shots with moving objects or camera (something this demonstration avoids), the result can be messy to say the least. I don't agree that AI technology is the answer to digital image-makers dreams. Currently, AI technology is a little like a piano playing dog, in as much as the novelty is endearing, but perhaps we're expecting, or are being promised too much? Speaking from experience, I've found AI technology in Topaz Labs' still photographic filters, and in their heavily promoted Video Enhance AI, often produce hideously ugly results. Perhaps in years to come digital artists will be blessed with more advanced technology in this area, but for the moment what we have is a lot of hype from IT vendors, and a handful of impressive results.
(No disrespect I just come here a lot and need this)
2:34 - *Draw Mask* & *Keyframe* so it covers the whole clip (Extra room is Fine)
4:34 - *Mode* > *Subtract*
4:54 - *Content Aware Fill Tool*
Tips:
7:09 - *Feather Mask* to help with Jagged Edges
8:44 - Create a *Reference Frame*
A heart! You're too kind :) Thanks for the video!
The value he gives out in a video is insane.. best tutorial channel ever
Thanks for watching Wahib!
the potential of this is insane! easy clean plates on moving shots
Nobody breaks it down the way you do. This is why we subscribe -- thanks Olufemii!
this combined with a difference matte could be an awesome replacement for manual rotoscoping
JOsh I have no words ! You are a Legend my man ! God Bless you !
Quick note: If you're covering a title or something similar that DOESN"T move. You will need to create a reference frame
That's not how you modify the work area, you just zoomed in your timeline. The bracket you had grabbed first was the correct one (6:28). You can also use the shortcuts B and N to set the beginning and the end of the work area.
Wow... Ill never use Mocha Pro again to do this... Great tutorials as always Joshi!!!
Josh is using the Beta version, folks. The standard version in the 17.5.1 update doesn't have the "lighting correction" dropdown menu as part of the CAF panel.
This will be a lifesaver for people who forget to shoot a clean frame when they do VFX
Unbelievable... we've been editing video since the msDOS environment, I cannot believe how far we've come... Thanks for sharing!
SO dope right! Adobe's on a role this year!
@@Olufemii Absolutely... you know? I used to work on after effects when the tutorials where photocopies of screen shots. Isn't that crazy?...
Your videos are always awesome, thanks brother!
I think the shadow of the dog requires some kind of work to remove as well. How will it be removed?
On the dog clip. Why clone stamp instead of using a different frame to fill that area.
What about the shadow created by the dog?
Your right, I should have tracked a 4th mask on the shadow. CAF works great with removing shadows
I love this tool! Thank you for the tutorial.
Thank you!! Quick tutorial and it actually worked!! GREAT VIDEO!!
This is impressive but I think it probably only works this good in shots with natural landscapes which are random - I wonder if you tried this in an industrial setting like a factory where there are lots of straight lines if it would work at all - just curious, I'm not even a PC user but the technology is interesting
This is extremely handy, thank you! A conceptual question for you... so in your second shot you have a doggo running. When the doggo is in the right side of the frame, the left side is "empty"... so when the doggo moves to the left side later on in the clip is it possible that the CAF is using the "left-side empty" frames from earlier in the clip to fill in the space? Also, does the CAF only work with locked-down/tripod shots, or does it merely work BETTER with tripod shots--in your experience? Thank you!
great job man
Thanks, that was so useful.
This is amazing but what happens when the object you're removing becomes obscurred or moved off screen? What do I do with the mask at that point? It remains and content aware keeps filling the mask. ?
Awesome tutorial! Thanks!
Kinda wish we got to see how this works on a shot that would actually need content aware fill to take the object out. For both these shots, to get the same results one could just duplicate the clip to v2, mask out the objects that need to be removed, feather those masks, then move the clip on the bottom over juust enough frames for the guy and/or dog to never cross through the area of the mask in the clip above it.
TL;DR: Content aware fill is cool because it has the potential to create clean slates for shots which don't have them. Both the shots here have clean plates in the shot already, therefore CAF wasn't needed.
PS: That being said, there are sooo many tutorials that will go through drop down menu options without explaining what any of them do except for the one they wanted to use for their very specific scenario and Josh clearly took the time to give us all that info. The value of this can't be overstated.
PSS: honestly I bet if the parts of the title on either side of the " | " were swapped, I wouldn't have made this comment
Excellent video. Liked and subbed. Greetz from France and thank you.
They done made. Walking trough walls easy.
Wish you could add a reference video or frame, instead of creating one. Like, say I shot a clip without the object prior. I'm thinking of wire removal specifically.
is there a way to invert that ? so we have a mask of just moving object ?
Nice :D So either the subject or camera or both have to be moving I assume. The second one when you removed the dog, if you had tried to remove the person near the tree that wasn't moving and the camera isn't moving I suspect Content Aware would not be able to do it.
Great video -- thank you! One question: why do you prefer to do manual tracking instead of using the built-in AE tools? Just curious.
Great video , quick question, after the effect is applied, is it saved in AE, or brought back into prem pro cc to finish an edit.
hey guys, Why is the lighting correction not showing on my Content Aware fill panel ?
Adobe or Filmora?
Choose one
Holding the mic is so awkward, why not just use a lav?
Tis the 5 year question of this channel
If it works why buy extra is what I always say haha
He was a rapper in his last life... past life...
What about moving camera? Have you tried with non stabilized footage?
video starts at 02:29
Great effect. Will this work with 360 video?
محتاج تحميل الاضافة Content Aware Fill in After Effects
Dope tuts as always!
Thanks for checking this one out Abdul!
Thanks man!!
In my content aware fill window, it doesnt show me the mask contents
Thanks Josh, great vid
Thanks for watching Bobbi!
@@Olufemii Just wanted to let you know I've come back to this tut 6 months later to refresh my memory, just wanted to reiterate - great vid :)
0:57
Is that Croatia?
at the end shadow of the dog is visible. solution - bigger mask at the end?
Thank you
Those shots don't need CAF at all. If you have a static camera and a more or less static background, and all of the background is shown throughout the entire clip's length. this can be easily done with 2 freeze frames and 2 rough masks in a fraction of the time you spent on this. Especially the second shot, where there is no visual movement in the BG. CAF is needed when there is no easy way to get this done by hand, i.e. moving camera and always obscured parts of the BG. I'd love to see this feature shown with a more reasonable difficult shot. Right now, this feels like a lame demo of the feature, and I expect it to fall apart with every shot where it may actually be needed. Will have to play around with it myself then.
Why do you don't use "track mask"?
How long does it actually render the fill? The first version of this tool was completely unusable because of the time it took to do anything.
Can we reverse to use it to rotoscoping with diffrent mate
Hi ! Amazing video !! However, I got a problem...
When I generate a fill layer, the layer appears black and doesn't fill at all... does anyone has a solution ?...
Do you mean when creating a mask, it doesn't appear in the content-aware fill window? If so, I had the same problem and I tried hiding everything else except the layer to generate the fill and it worked! Hope this helps!
hi there great tutorial im on windows 10 pro latest version adobe effects, tried masking im not getting the masking options to subtract the handels any ideas? am stuck
pc is high end so can handle anything i think
its the add path i think
Zoinks, in case you didnt notice he does in fact have 2 cameras lmao
It works so slow on my pc. Didn't try the beta.
my pc dont like this update
Does it work if the camera is moving?
It definitely does!
A glowing advertisement for Adobe, that appears within an another advertisement for Envato Elements. I'm sure RUclips motion graphic tutors would claim this is necessary for their economic survival. In any case, a truer description of Adobe's Content Aware Fill for AE is that is when applied to shots with moving objects or camera (something this demonstration avoids), the result can be messy to say the least.
I don't agree that AI technology is the answer to digital image-makers dreams. Currently, AI technology is a little like a piano playing dog, in as much as the novelty is endearing, but perhaps we're expecting, or are being promised too much? Speaking from experience, I've found AI technology in Topaz Labs' still photographic filters, and in their heavily promoted Video Enhance AI, often produce hideously ugly results. Perhaps in years to come digital artists will be blessed with more advanced technology in this area, but for the moment what we have is a lot of hype from IT vendors, and a handful of impressive results.
It didn't work for me
wat the hell this is nuts
adobe and nvidia should work together on ai
$9? I dont see it aside from free 1 month and a $16.50 per month
Hey! Technically the first month is free until December 19th. After that'll be $9 for the first month.
Mbappe😂
круто
No need of content aware fill in this video.. as it is static frame. just mask it out the old-school way.
this isn't new
Stop talking about nonsense, just get to the point, our time isn't free
uh what? the anger issues are strong within you.
@@chadiwack thanks yoda
alot of unemployment ahead of us in the future.