We used to have an Indian restaurant near me. The lamb was delicious and the owner sometimes went around giving customers free alcohol. Whether he was correcting Karma or working on Dharma I do not know. But when my wife drinks I benefit 😎
Beautiful flowers might looks to different from tree, soil and fertilizer but molecularly same. So debates aren't beneficial everywhere specially organized by social media and narratives..
I would take this channel's teachings on "Hinduism" with a "grain of salt." Buddhism, like all knowledge, is actually a branch of the Vedas, but over time, teachings change due to time, place, circumstance, etc. Watch the "Eternal Religion" vid n its description by youtuber "Playitalready" which is currently his main vid, then click his sub n bell icons for some EPIC vids in the future that are more detailed, well sourced, interesting, n HD. Comment there because youtube's A I removes comments a lot, but Playitalready tries to UN remove comments directed to me, or him. Also youtube search "Scientific Verification of Vedic Knowledge--Full Length" by Stephen Knapp. Let me know if this comment, helped.
Here's a sneak preview . . . *Rig Veda 10.96.8* "At the swift draught, the Iron One with yellow beard and yellow hair" *Rig Veda 1.100.18* “Indra attacked the Dasyus and the Śimyus; won the land, sunlight, and water with his white-complexioned friends” *Rig Veda 1.103.3* “Armed with the thunderbolt, he has gone on destroying the cities of the Dasyus, and augment the strength and glory of the Ārya.” *Rig Veda. 2.20.6* "Indra, the slayer of Vrittra, has scattered the Dasyu sprang from a b______ womb." *Rig Veda 9.73.5* “They have roared in unison, burning up riteless men, Blowing away the b______ skin which Indra hates.”
I am seeing some people writing that Sanatan dharma (Hinduism) has CASTE SYSTEM which is wrong Hinduism has Varna system which based on karma but it became caste system which was based upon birth..............NO HINDU TEXT PROMOTES INEQUALITY AMONG PEOPLE.....ITS PEOPLE'S FAULT
Still its practiced only among Hindus. Which is why buddha was right. Hindusim does not lead to Enlightement. How could it ? By creating inequality among people ?
@@n.sadequi4381 Again it's the people who create inequalities among themselves............There are over 1.1 to 1.2 billion Hindus and 90% don't promote this man made system who are in India,Nepal, Mauritius , Indonesia , newly converts etc........who feel purpose in there life and feel that they are getting closer to enlightenment with different ways...................
Original religion of sidhaarth gautama was Hinduism only after enlightenment awakening he was called buddha and followers are called Buddhist following culture and practice is called Buddhism.
Siddhartha was living in a Royal family. They didn't have a religion. Early Brahamanism survived with the help of modified texts like Mahabharat, Valmiki's Ramayan, Bhagawath geetha after the Chandraguptha's invation.
💐THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God saves man from the destruction of this old world" (This may be a reminder for most people of God's words from Genesis: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness." Suppose God is saying that "let us" make man in "our " picture, then "ours" shows two or more; since He said "ours," then God is not only one. In this way, man begins to think generally of different persons, and from these words came the idea of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. At the time Moses wrote Genesis, it was after the creation of mankind following the creation of the world. In the beginning, when the world, Moses did not exist yet. And it was a long time before Moses wrote the Bible, so how could he possibly know what God said in heaven? He was unaware of how God created the world. What is written in the Old Testament is the work of Jehovah, a phase of the work of God Himself for ushering in the Age of Law. This is the work of God, where as He spoke, it happened, and as He commanded, it remained. When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. When man speaks of separate persons, does it not reflect God? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Doesn't the Spirit of God simply carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives?" Because of this, there is no distinction between persons.) Almighty God said This can be a REMINDER for most PEOPLE of GOD'S WORDS from GENESIS: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." Suppose GOD says "we" will CREATE MAN in "our" IMAGE, then "we" SHOWS TWO or MORE; since He SAID "we," then GOD is NOT one. IN THIS WAY, MAN BEGAN TO THINK GENERALLY OF DIFFERENT PERSONS, AND FROM THESE WORDS HAD THE IDEA OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. What then does the Father look like? What does the Son look like? And what does the Holy Spirit look like? ☀️🙏 Could it be that the present man was made in the image of the one who was put together from the three? Then is the image of man like that of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? 🙏 WHICH of the persons of GOD is the image of MAN? This idea of MAN is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and NONSENSE! It can only separate one God from several Gods. 🙏 AT THE TIME Moses WROTE GENESIS, it was AFTER MANKIND WAS CREATED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE WORLD. In the BEGINNING, when the WORLD began, Moses did NOT exist. And IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR MOSES TO WRITE THE BIBLE, so HOW could he possibly KNOW WHAT GOD SAID in HEAVEN?🙏☀️ He is UNCONSCIOUS of HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLD. 🙏 In the OLD TESTAMENT of the Bible, there is NO mention of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, only the TRUE GOD, JEHOVAH, is PERFORMING His WORK in ISRAEL. ☀️ He is CALLED by different NAMES in the CHANGING TIMES, but this DOESN'T PROVE that each NAME REFERES to a different PERSON. Therefore, then wouldn't there be countless persons of God? What is WRITTEN in the OLD TESTAMENT is the WORK of JEHOVAH, A PHASE of the WORK of GOD HIMSELF for the START of the Age of Law. This is GOD'S WORK, where ACCORDING to what He SPOKE, it happened, and ACCORDING to what He commanded, it REMAINS. 🙏💐 AT NO TIME DID JEHOVAH SAY HE WAS THE FATHER WHO WOULD COME TO EFFECT THE WORK, or did He even foretell the coming of the Son to redeem mankind. WHEN IT CAME TO THE TIME OF JESUS, it was only mentioned that GOD became MAN to REDEEM ALL MANKIND, NOT that the SON CAME. ☀️ Because the times are not the same and the work that God Himself carries out is also different, He has to carry out His work within different kingdoms. In this way, the identity He represents is also different. PEOPLE BELIEVE JEHOVAH IS THE FATHER OF JESUS, but JESUS DOESN'T REALLY ACKNOWLEDGE, saying: "We were never identified as Father and Son; I and the Father in heaven are one. The Father is in Me and I am in the Father; when men see the Son, they see the Father in heaven." ☀️😪 When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. By the time man attempts to explain, matters are complicated by the idea of different persons, as well as the relationship between Father, Son, and Spirit. WHEN MAN TALKS ABOUT separate persons, does it not reflect GOD? 🙏🔅 Man even ranks persons as first, second, and third; these are all mere human understandings, unworthy of reference, and utterly unreal! If you ask him: "How many are there in God?" He will say that God is the Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: the one true God. If you ask him: "Who is the Father?" He will say: The Father is the Spirit of God in heaven; He rules over all, and He is the Lord of heaven." "Then is Jehovah the Spirit?" ☀️ He will say: "Yes!" If you ask him afterwards, "Who is the Son?" He will say that Jesus is the Son, anyway: "Then what is the story of Jesus? From whom did He come?" He will say: "Jesus was born of Mary through the shadowing of the Holy Spirit. " ☀️ "Then is not His substance also Spirit? Does His work also represent the Holy Spirit? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Now in the last days, it goes without saying that the Spirit still works; how did He become different persons? Doesn't the Spirit of God just carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives? Because of this, there is no difference between personas. 🙏 From "Is There a Trinity?" Fulfilled in "In the beginning He was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). ... and "When I looked up, someone handed me a book wrapped in a scroll. I opened it and I read on both sides the prayers, lamentations, and curses." (Ezekiel 2:9-10). ... "His garment was stained with blood. He was called the "Word of God" (Rev. 19:13). The kingdom He brought down and set up in the highest in the sky so that it can occupy His creation in the universe and engrave on it the entirety of His Holy name "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD" 💐 fulfillment of (Mat. 16:18) "And I say as for you, you are Peter, on top of this rock I will build my Church, that even the power of death will not prevail over it.". ... and "The Letter to the Church in Philadelphia" (Rev. 3:7-13). ... And fulfillment of "The New Jerusalem" 💫 "The Spirit enveloped me, and the angel led me to the top of a very high mountain. He showed Me Jerusalem, the Holy City, coming down from heaven from God." (Rev. 3:7-13). ... " For the time has come in the house of God for the beginning of judgment in the house of God." (1 Peter 4:17). ... It is fulfilled that God Himself is our Pastor in (Rev. 7:17) 💐 "For the Lamb in the midst of the throne will be their PASTOR. He will lead them to springs of life-giving water; and God will wipe away the tears from their eyes" 📩 Calling and leading the sheep of God to His glorious Throne "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD"💐 to submit again to His authority so that He will continue to teach, guide and protect even in plague, famine and wild animals will not be moved by it and completely win this final battle with the big red dragon! "They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and it will be fulfilled that will be established above the sky/RUclips in (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . . . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace."✉️ 💌
Yeah Siddhartha probably left Hinduism because of the barbaric caste system and untouchability, which is still there and some idiotic hindus still justify it. 🤮
Hinduism is totally different from Buddhism. Hinduism has no particular one origin. There are many devas in Hindu. Where as Buddhism emerged only from Gautama Buddha thats why its called Buddhism.
No its same first thing is Buddha was born in hindu family but he was against Verna system of hinduism and many things in world so when he got enlightened he bacame buddha after his death his followers started to called as Buddhist. Buddhism don't believe in god but they believe in same thing like Hindus Liberatation , multiverse and all .They also believe in devi dewtas but not in supreme god like hindus. But its also a fact that different country follows Buddhism different with the touch of their pegan belief like japan .If you go to Nepal , Darjeeling and sikkim you will find different Buddhism that south East. They follow mixture of Hinduism and Buddhism and Hindu of theses palces also follows different hinduism than Minland India they follows hinduism mixture with Buddhism and shamanism.
As a once wester Christian I have taking something from both without knowing about them. One God, service to others, meditation, KARMA, reincarnation and so on. I have my own path. I believe to follow any religion is restrictive.
From my study, I've found Christ to be the most reliable person to know about God and the path of Salvation( which is a free gift), through the historical evidence for Jesus' life, death n reserruction. No other religion has such validity as Christianity. And no other religion gives you the assurance of Salvation but Christianity. May Jesus bless and lead you and your loved ones to Him.
@@seekjustice-gp2xi Resurrection _is_ REAL. The Egyptian Osiris; the Greek Adonis and Dionysus, Canaanite, Ba'al; the Phrygian Attis; Mesopotamian Tammuz; Iranian Mithras all died and came back to life . . . centuries before the Bible was written.
@@dutchkittensten1079 Are you sure? . . . *Matthew 10:34-35* “Do NOT suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a *SWORD*. For I have come to turn a man _against_ his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law." *Matthew 10:37* “Anyone who loves their father or mother more than me is NOT worthy of me; anyone who loves their son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.” *Luke 14:26* “If anyone comes to me and does not *HATE* their father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters - yes, even their own life - such a person can NOT be my disciple."
So Buddha learned about other religions first, maybe Hinduism too since it's oldest religion in the world, before he realized they were wrong path (not leading to nirvana, enlightenment, peaceful lasting state), so he went out on his own; and after 6 long years of starving and hunger (almost killed himself), he followed the middle path, middle way which eventually led him to enlightment and of course nirvana after he passed, forever left earth. No one no being is quite like Buddha 😊
Buddhism or Hinduism is not a religion both are new words derived centuries after these culture have arrived Indian culture which you call budhism or Hinduism has dities & Salvation from karma is target of both Hindus & Buddhist also there's no difference only difference is budhism in atheist school is ancient times
Did you not see the last part? To break free from Samsara (cycle of rebirth) in Hinduism is called Moksha and the same in Buddhism is called Nirvana. Moksha and Nirvana are one and the same. Buddha was a Hindu prince who wanted a simpler solution to lifes problems so he created Buddhism and the 8 rules. Hinduism is more complex and deals with also the scientific aspect of the universe. There are no real Gods in Hinduism just manifestations of the forces of the universe and of human character example Shiva and Brahma represents the renewal of the universe through destruction and creation. Krishna represents a human of great moral integrity.
@@sokTAU911 To preserve Dharma. Who is Buddha? Buddha is not Siddhartha Gautama, so who is Buddhas human body manifesting? Is it no one special? If it isn't then why do we give any significance do his teachings? Krishna is the same, he is God manifested as a teacher. They are not the same if you start to go into the technicalities of their births into this world and what they explicitly describe themselves to be, but they are the same in that they are both a profound wisdom and intelligence manifested in Samsara, and that they both teach Dharma.
As an agnostic atheist born in Brazil (a western country), learning how eastern religions work is really interesting and fun, I knew that Buddhism and Hinduism had something in common but I wanted to know their main differences, because they're some of the unique religions that I do respect and see some utility for life (unlike christianity or islam, which are awful and totally contemptous). Amazing video and keep up the good work!
core concept is same . also being atheist is also a practice of hinduism means you dont believe in god but only nature or whatever. also there is nothing in bhudhism which is not present in hinduism just have diff name . i myself from the place of bhudha where this religion started . i dont ubderstand why people think its all different specially non INDIAN SUCONDINENT AND NON TIBETIAN AS WELL.i dont even no about all this division in my chldhood not only bhudhism but my place gave birth to one more religion janism which is also have same core concept bt its some knowledge you will not find in bhudhism but it s in hinduism . so basically all ancient Indian knowledge come under hinduism and bhudhism and janism hold some of its part . as native to this land we dont discriminate btw these three including shikhism so pls stop you all . bhudhism spread across asia becouse hindu king and buisnessmen donate them also help them in travel {buisnessmans help} as you know both have monks at that time they both consider as same but due to mughal invasion and many cast or diff groups in bhudhism started fight btw themselves and look down on each other as hindu also used to face during british era becouse due to being officially registred it becomes rigid . so so by this all factor bhusist converted back in hinduism and its different believes now follow in different part dippending which group spread bhusism there . but tibetian know it just outsider non bhusist or recently converted are rude . so pls follow its concept not hat. i wrote it to fast so sorry for any mistakes . have a nice day and do yoga good for your health as it not connected to any of these religion its practice of this land. ok if you can guess my gender by name . sorry for this much big parragraph people say i talk to much and so fast . so also in typing . maye mistakes are more becouse i am wrighting on my laptop .if possible also my age just a small task for you for sharp memory just kidding sorry for my foolinesh.
You believe in the following fairy tales, right? Everything in the universe magically came from nothing, fish ancestors, Imaginary worlds ( multiverse), and science fictional characters ( aliens) etc,.
@@hugocheng6243 Sir, you have not heard much about Shinto religion and Hindu religion, I have been studying for a long time and I know that the names of many Shinto Gods and their functions are the same. Like Lord Kangiten Also Known As Binayaka-Ten Is Looks Like Hindu God Lord Ganesha Also Known As Vinayaka, And Yenma The God Of Death In Shinto Religion Is Looks Like Yama The God Of Death In Hindu Religion
I wouldn't say that meditation is central to Buddhism, but just one integrated part of the Eightfold Path. Most Buddhists worldwide don't even have a meditation practice. It's something that became amplified to the point of being synonymous with Buddhism only when Zen, which _is_ heavily focused on meditation, came to the West, and people took Zen to be what _all_ Buddhism looks like.
Its funny how Buddhism has been warped to suit different cultures. For example one of the rules of the 8 fold part is Right Conduct or Action: That means no killing or injuring any creature, no taking what is not given, no sexual misconduct, no material desires. But some Buddhists do eat meat which is wrong.
Very accurate statement! Yes, exactly. A kind of liberal, non supernatural based Zen teaching is what became famous in US, but that doesn't represent Buddhism at all. Most Buddhism speaks a lot about demons, hells, ghosts, which Zen largely leaves out.
@@jaisinghrajput2995 Only Europeans can become Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishas . . . *Rig Veda 10.23.4* "With him is this rains: Indra throws drops of moisture on his yellow beard" *Rig Veda 1.100.18* “Indra attacked the Dasyus and the Śimyus; won the land, sunlight, and water with his white-complexioned friends” *Rig Veda 1.130.8* “Indra defends his Ārya worshiper. He consumes the malignant; he tore off the b_______ skin; and him who delights in cruelty.” *Rig Veda 2.20.7* “Indra, the slayer of Vṛtra, destroyer of cities, has scattered the b______-sprung servile.” *Rig Veda 9.73.5* “They have roared in unison, burning up riteless men, Blowing away the b______ skin which Indra hates.”
Buddhism is to ascetic for most ppl, thats also why Indian Kings and the masses chose Hinduism with it's devotional path, in favor of Buddhism. Also Hindu concepts and practises are increasing in the West whereas ppl in the West only have icon of Buddha at home but dont really practise the religion.
One of the greatest Kings in indian history chose buddhism over hinduism.. even buddhism was the dominant religion in that era without the force.. but Hindus(brahmins) couldn't do anything so they adopted buddha as an avatar of Vishnu.. after extremist mughlas and Hindus buddhism vanished.. One of the main reasons why it was easy to vanish is buddhsim isn't forcefully practiced by people... every people got equal rights while hindusim teaches castes😢.. how some can be a sinner or a lower form of human because of their birth place/caste..? Karma doesn't work that way.. someone's birth caste is not how their whole life should be.. bad karma so bad place to birth.. that's it.. they too can achieve pure goals in life..but brahmins made a concept that someone's birth caste is their whole identity.. till death it is their sin..😢
@@ChannaJayawardhana-h1o Take a deep breath kid, and let’s analyze actual Buddha and core Buddhist works, (Tipiṭakas) rather than works of irrelevant and biased people. I have taken translations not my own, but from passionate scholars, who have tried their best to translate the verses politically correct. It is not ironical that still, the verses translated do reek of Buddha’s psyche. “In the past, brahmins coupled only with brahmin women, not with non-brahmin women. But now brahmins couple with both brahmin women and non-brahmin women . Dogs, how ever, still couple only with female dogs, not with other female animals. This is the first ancient brahmin practice that is now seen among dogs but not among brahmins.” Aṅguttaranikāya (tipiṭaka) 3.221, trans. Bikkhu Bodhi. "And how, Doṇa, is a brahmin similar to a deva? Here, a brahmin is well born of both his maternal and paternal sides, of pure descent, unassailable and impeccable with respect to birth as far back as the seventh paternal generation. He lives the spiritual life of virginal celibacy for forty-eight years, studying the hymns. He then seeks a teacher's fee for his teacher solely in accordance with the Dhamma, not contrary to the Dhamma. And what, Dona, is the Dhamma in that case? Not by agriculture, not by trade, not by raising cattle, not by archery, not by service to the king, not by a particular craft, but solely by wandering for alms without scorning the alms bowl. Having offered the teacher's fee to his teacher, he seeks a wife solely in accordance with the Dhamma, not contrary to the Dhamma. And what, Dona, is the Dhamma in that case? Not by buying and selling, [he takes] only a brahmin woman given to him by the pouring of water. He couples only with a brahmin woman, not with a khattiya woman, a vessa woman , a sudda woman , or a candala woman, nor with a woman from a family of hunters, bamboo workers, chariot makers, or flower scavengers…” Aṅguttara, 3.226 trans. Bhikku Bodhi In the following verses, he calls such fallen Brahmins who don’t observe moral and racial purity as “caṇḍālas of Brahmins”. Aah, so non racist. Could anyone locate such a verse saying this explicitly from any pre Buddhist scripture in India? One often quoted (cherry picked) text is Assalāyana sutta where Buddha accuses Brahmins of claiming themselves to be high in caste, and counters a teen reverent Brahmin boy Assalāyana with his always amazing sentences. An anti Brahmanic India of twentieth century and forth saw much of the verses as against Brahmin supremacy. But, what does Buddha believe Brahmins should have did better? His tactics to convert Brahmins is though, always amazing. (Assalāyana) : Is that son born of the brahmin prince and warrior maiden, according to the father known a `brahmin' or according to the mother known a `warrior? Good Gotama, that son born of the Brahmin prince and the warrior maiden, according to the father should be known a `brahmin' and according to the mother a `warrior. (Buddha) : Assalàyana, to a mare and donkey a mule is born, according to the mother should it be known a'horse' or according to the father should it be known a `donkey'? (Assalāyana) : Good Gotama, it's from a thoroughbred that a pony is born. Now I see the difference, in the earlier examples I did not see any difference. Wow. This logic had deep entry into contemporary societies. It would be interesting to link why non Brahmanic communities in India took to strict endogamy, while Brahmins were ready to marry any other community, or even accept them into varna system for a social good. It is so funny to read the Sutta in Majjhima Nikāya. The Buddhists pester a poor teen boy whom they speak of as learned in three Vedas, for a debate with Buddha, of a claim which Buddha himself makes. Even after Assalāyana says several times that Gotama who speaks Dhamma can’t be countered, the Buddhists still force him, and he comes to Buddha with a group of Brahmins and shares a humble and polite talk. Assalāyana says, for the sake of debate that Brahmins say they are pure castes, others aren’t. (Same thing repeated, burdened on the Brahmins by Buddha everywhere) To which Buddha provides his ready made examples to show how Brahmins are impure. His statements start with this (2.149) : Now, Assalayana, the brahmin women are seen having their periods, becoming pregnant, giving birth, and giving suck. And yet those who are born from the wombs of the brahmin women say thus: 'Brahmins are the highest caste...brahmins alone are the sons of Brahma, the offspring of Brahma, born of his mouth, born of Brahma, created by Brahma, heirs of Brahma. This one beginning statement is enough to see what kind of purity Buddha had in his mind. Though he becomes more vocal of “social equality” in the forthcoming sentences, to establish that purification ceremonies must be for all, and not just Brahmins. But his this attitude was only when against what he thought himself as the claims of Brahmins. Similar to how contemporary Brahmin scholars themselves “bashed” Samaṇas in their works. Buddha wasn’t any different from them. But surely, Buddha attributes one thing to Brahmins as their claim, them being “fairer”. This stuff is absent in all Brahmanic scriptures. Rather, it also cuts the way to understand Buddha’s psyche of what he thought inside as superior. At certain times, Buddha would speak more openly of Kshatriyas to be superior to Brahmins. It is not a secret that Buddhism was mouthpiece of Kshatriyan supremacy which wanted to enter not just its stronghold of ruling, but also economy and religion. In the Ambattha sutta, a young kid doesn’t apparently “venerate Buddha” to the extent what Buddha wanted. On asking, Ambattha is shown to reply that Brahmins usually show such kind of respects only to another Brahmin, but not to lowly people, “dark fellows” (that is a Buddhan fantasy) and so on. To which Buddha replies Ambattha is ill bred. A triggered kid, says that Shakyas are the menial ones who don’t even honour any Brahmin or pay respect to them. Buddha becomes more triggered, as Shakya is his own clan. A triggered Buddha says : And what family do you then, Ambattha, belong to?' 'I am a Kanhâyana.' 'Yes, but if one were to follow up your ancient name and lineage, Ambattha, on the father's and the mother's side, it would appear that the Sâkyas were once your masters, and that you are the offspring of one of their slave girls. But the Sâkyas trace their line back to Okkâka the king …. … Now Okkâka had a slave girl called Disâ. She gave birth to a black baby. And no sooner was it born than the little black thing said, "Wash me, mother. Bathe me, mother. Set me free, mother, of this dirt. So shall I be of use to you." 'Now just as now, Ambattha, people call devils "devils," so then they (Śākyas) called devils "black fellows" (kanhe). And they said: "This fellow spoke as soon as he was born. 'Tis a black thing (kanha) that is born, a devil has been born!" And that is the origin, Ambattha, of the Kanhayanas. He was the ancestor of the Kanhâyanas. And thus is it, Ambattha, that if one were to follow up your ancient name and lineage, on the father's and on the mother's side, it would appear that the Sâkyas were once your masters, and that you are the offspring of one of their slave girls.' That was a bold attack by Buddha on this young person. And he was asked to counter this legend. Which he couldn’t. 😅 Now go somewhere else kid to spread youre ignorant propoganda against Hinduism and the Brahmins. 🤣🤣🤣
before 7 century your hinduam is not exist in indian and Nepal You don't have any archeaology evidence of hindusm before buddha even before samrath asok
It’s important to note that Buddhism is extremely diverse. There is a multitude of different schools/traditions of Buddhism present today. It has an exceptional ability to be accepted and transformed by each new culture it encounters. That’s why there’s so many “Flavors” of Buddhism so if you’re interested do some research and find a tradition that resonates most with you.
"Extremely diverse" But it does not mean valid. Any "diverse" views which contradict well validated Vedic metaphysics Sankhya (which combines Advaitha and Dvaitha) can be discarded or ignored. Sankhya Vedic metaphysics can be validated by logic, double slit quantum experiment and embodied experience. The same rule applies to other "dharmic traditions" as well like Hindu, Sikh and Jain with "diverse" views. In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different codes of conduct 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm) But of course, different codes of conduct are followed by them which give them their "identity" misunderstood as different metaphysics.. So, Buddhism is impractical for many due to stricter codes of conduct just like Jain and Sikh traditions. it is the reason why even people who were born in such families don't abide by their strict requirements. But Hindu tradition has more clarity when it comes to different yoga pathways which lead to the same outcome. eg Karma yoga (lead a worldly life but at the same not violate dharma or not create karma/cause and effect) and Sanyasa yoga (complete renunciation) Point is you can't call yourself a "Buddhist" since you do "vipassana" in the morning and evening just like some Hollywood actors. 🤣🤣You got to follow renunciation and become a Buddhist monk. 🤣🤣
Some info guys.. SANATAN DHARMA (Hinduism) is a pluralistic religion and a way of life which accepts one god ( formless,cannot be described) with many forms ( shiva , vishnu ,brahma,shakti etc ) and god also decended on earth (ram and krishna) to give us the message and importance of dharma...........Athiest and agnostics can also practice the religion as we have many philosophies what matters and unites every sect of hinduism is *that we should follow our dharma *Respect every scripture and vedas are most divine scripture of hindus.... Many more things like dualism,non dualism ,nature worship etc.....
It's a nice vid to talk on. it's "incomplete" n inaccurate. Buddhism is really a branch of the Vedas (what he incorrectly refers to as "Hinduism" n incorrectly claims teaches a birth based caste system when Vedas never mentioned that system except when it correctly warned that society would fall into it). Thus, other than Buddhism not mentioning a creator n permanence, all Buddhist teachings I ever read, are consistently Vedic. Buddha did talk about Demigods of the Vedas (AKA Angels), heaven, n hell. However, in 5th Veda it correctly predicted God would incarnate to help animals and, "...appear as Lord Buddha, the son of Añjanā, in the province of Gayā, just for the purpose of deluding those who are envious of the faithful theist." 4,000 years? The Vedas were composed OVER 5,000 years ago, but were taught through word of mouth BEFORE that, for countless millennia (to societies that were more advanced than us). Vedas have a history of 4.3 billion Earth years, which they teach is 1 day on a top planet in the universe. Check out those roughly 10,000 year old cities found miles from India in the Ocean (reported by sources like the BBC). Over 5,000 years ago there was a great war involving the powerful rulers of Earth, with the victor becoming basically the Emperor of Earth. The Vedas were the source of the people’s spirituality/schools, politics, farming etc. All math, major sciences, the oldest, most accurate history, predictions that have come true (like of God’s great flood) or are coming or will come true etc. were originally stated in the Vedas. People who followed the Vedas were called Arya (sometimes with "n" at the end) which means noble in the sense of following the Vedas. The "Arya Invasion theory" is faulty speculation. The Vedas warned that the % of people who follow the Vedas, truth, goodness, marriage vows, compassion for animals, etc. decline starting 5,000 years ago, with explanations on why it’d happened (but with a rare golden age that can happen possibly within our lifetime). The Earth's exact measurement as a globe, its 7 continents, Jesus Christ, the most detailed, accurate, advanced models of creation, evolution, etc all were 1st mentioned from Vedas. Click the sub, bell icons on youtuber "Playitalready" for upcoming vids with more detail, sources, evidence, insight, n fun. For now, watch his old, ok vids.
The four Dharmic religions (Hindu-Buddhist-Jain-Sikhism) native to the land of Bharat share ideas of Karma, Dharma, Samsara, Moksha, and Yoga. These religions share many similarities in core beliefs, modes of worship, and associated practices with 'Om' being the highest energy source. Ek Omkar. In Buddhism Dhamma is the Prakrit word for the Sanskrit word Dharma and in Jainism, the word "Dharma" is termed as 'dharmastikaay' and In Sikhism called 'Dharman'. Respect all the 4 🙏
@@Manoj-vp5indig into topics deeper or actually visit and talk with the ones who follow it. Buddhism was born by rejecting vedas, saying one doesn't necessarily need knowledge for moksh (which is true) knowledge does help but isn't necessary. Sanskrit is one of the oldest language and still prevails to this day and many languages are derived from it. Sanatan is a Sanskrit word. Whether it is Pali or any other devanagari scripts all are derivatives of Sanskrit. The evidence of Sanskrit dates back to 1500 BCE while for Pali it dates back to 3rd/5th century BCE.
@@mohitpatel9974 What happened in 1,500 BCE? *Rig Veda 10.23.4* "With him is this rains: Indra throws drops of moisture on his yellow beard" *Rig Veda 1.100.18* “Indra attacked the Dasyus and the Śimyus; won the land, sunlight, and water with his white-complexioned friends” *Rig Veda 1.130.8* “Indra defends his Ārya worshiper. He consumes the malignant; he tore off the b_______ skin; and him who delights in cruelty.” *Rig Veda 2.20.7* “Indra, the slayer of Vṛtra, destroyer of cities, has scattered the b______-sprung servile.” *Rig Veda 9.73.5* “They have roared in unison, burning up riteless men, Blowing away the b______ skin which Indra hates.”
@@Sheshnaga We should promote mostly rajasthani forts and palaces and south Indian temples as our Indian monuments when it comes to tourism,these are all fully indian style monuments and more majestic looking unlike tajmahal.But our tourism Industry people in India only promote mughal made monuments in delhi and agra.It's mainly because of delhi centric bias in our country
💐THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God saves man from the destruction of this old world" (This may be a reminder for most people of God's words from Genesis: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness." Suppose God is saying that "let us" make man in "our " picture, then "ours" shows two or more; since He said "ours," then God is not only one. In this way, man begins to think generally of different persons, and from these words came the idea of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. At the time Moses wrote Genesis, it was after the creation of mankind following the creation of the world. In the beginning, when the world, Moses did not exist yet. And it was a long time before Moses wrote the Bible, so how could he possibly know what God said in heaven? He was unaware of how God created the world. What is written in the Old Testament is the work of Jehovah, a phase of the work of God Himself for ushering in the Age of Law. This is the work of God, where as He spoke, it happened, and as He commanded, it remained. When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. When man speaks of separate persons, does it not reflect God? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Doesn't the Spirit of God simply carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives?" Because of this, there is no distinction between persons.) Almighty God said This can be a REMINDER for most PEOPLE of GOD'S WORDS from GENESIS: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." Suppose GOD says "we" will CREATE MAN in "our" IMAGE, then "we" SHOWS TWO or MORE; since He SAID "we," then GOD is NOT one. IN THIS WAY, MAN BEGAN TO THINK GENERALLY OF DIFFERENT PERSONS, AND FROM THESE WORDS HAD THE IDEA OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. What then does the Father look like? What does the Son look like? And what does the Holy Spirit look like? ☀️🙏 Could it be that the present man was made in the image of the one who was put together from the three? Then is the image of man like that of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? 🙏 WHICH of the persons of GOD is the image of MAN? This idea of MAN is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and NONSENSE! It can only separate one God from several Gods. 🙏 AT THE TIME Moses WROTE GENESIS, it was AFTER MANKIND WAS CREATED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE WORLD. In the BEGINNING, when the WORLD began, Moses did NOT exist. And IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR MOSES TO WRITE THE BIBLE, so HOW could he possibly KNOW WHAT GOD SAID in HEAVEN?🙏☀️ He is UNCONSCIOUS of HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLD. 🙏 In the OLD TESTAMENT of the Bible, there is NO mention of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, only the TRUE GOD, JEHOVAH, is PERFORMING His WORK in ISRAEL. ☀️ He is CALLED by different NAMES in the CHANGING TIMES, but this DOESN'T PROVE that each NAME REFERES to a different PERSON. Therefore, then wouldn't there be countless persons of God? What is WRITTEN in the OLD TESTAMENT is the WORK of JEHOVAH, A PHASE of the WORK of GOD HIMSELF for the START of the Age of Law. This is GOD'S WORK, where ACCORDING to what He SPOKE, it happened, and ACCORDING to what He commanded, it REMAINS. 🙏💐 AT NO TIME DID JEHOVAH SAY HE WAS THE FATHER WHO WOULD COME TO EFFECT THE WORK, or did He even foretell the coming of the Son to redeem mankind. WHEN IT CAME TO THE TIME OF JESUS, it was only mentioned that GOD became MAN to REDEEM ALL MANKIND, NOT that the SON CAME. ☀️ Because the times are not the same and the work that God Himself carries out is also different, He has to carry out His work within different kingdoms. In this way, the identity He represents is also different. PEOPLE BELIEVE JEHOVAH IS THE FATHER OF JESUS, but JESUS DOESN'T REALLY ACKNOWLEDGE, saying: "We were never identified as Father and Son; I and the Father in heaven are one. The Father is in Me and I am in the Father; when men see the Son, they see the Father in heaven." ☀️😪 When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. By the time man attempts to explain, matters are complicated by the idea of different persons, as well as the relationship between Father, Son, and Spirit. WHEN MAN TALKS ABOUT separate persons, does it not reflect GOD? 🙏🔅 Man even ranks persons as first, second, and third; these are all mere human understandings, unworthy of reference, and utterly unreal! If you ask him: "How many are there in God?" He will say that God is the Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: the one true God. If you ask him: "Who is the Father?" He will say: The Father is the Spirit of God in heaven; He rules over all, and He is the Lord of heaven." "Then is Jehovah the Spirit?" ☀️ He will say: "Yes!" If you ask him afterwards, "Who is the Son?" He will say that Jesus is the Son, anyway: "Then what is the story of Jesus? From whom did He come?" He will say: "Jesus was born of Mary through the shadowing of the Holy Spirit. " ☀️ "Then is not His substance also Spirit? Does His work also represent the Holy Spirit? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Now in the last days, it goes without saying that the Spirit still works; how did He become different persons? Doesn't the Spirit of God just carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives? Because of this, there is no difference between personas. 🙏 From "Is There a Trinity?" Fulfilled in "In the beginning He was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). ... and "When I looked up, someone handed me a book wrapped in a scroll. I opened it and I read on both sides the prayers, lamentations, and curses." (Ezekiel 2:9-10). ... "His garment was stained with blood. He was called the "Word of God" (Rev. 19:13). The kingdom He brought down and set up in the highest in the sky so that it can occupy His creation in the universe and engrave on it the entirety of His Holy name "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD" 💐 fulfillment of (Mat. 16:18) "And I say as for you, you are Peter, on top of this rock I will build my Church, that even the power of death will not prevail over it.". ... and "The Letter to the Church in Philadelphia" (Rev. 3:7-13). ... And fulfillment of "The New Jerusalem" 💫 "The Spirit enveloped me, and the angel led me to the top of a very high mountain. He showed Me Jerusalem, the Holy City, coming down from heaven from God." (Rev. 3:7-13). ... " For the time has come in the house of God for the beginning of judgment in the house of God." (1 Peter 4:17). ... It is fulfilled that God Himself is our Pastor in (Rev. 7:17) 💐 "For the Lamb in the midst of the throne will be their PASTOR. He will lead them to springs of life-giving water; and God will wipe away the tears from their eyes" 📩 Calling and leading the sheep of God to His glorious Throne "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD"💐 to submit again to His authority so that He will continue to teach, guide and protect even in plague, famine and wild animals will not be moved by it and completely win this final battle with the big red dragon! "They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and it will be fulfilled that will be established above the sky/RUclips in (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . . . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace."✉️ 💌
@@vasudevanbalasubramanian8572 that’s not grounds for reporting a video. This is an illustrated video and I do my best to make it accurate but of course it’s not perfect. Go ahead and report it, but it won’t do anything in a petty situation as this. If you continue to harass me and my channel, I will report you however. Your choice.
Prince Siddhartha known as Buddha was an Emperor's Son and was well versed in Vedas. He was A Hindu Yogi and difference was he broke Social Laws of Hinduism where Life is divided in 4 Varnas and 4 Ashrams 4 Varnas are Classes not Castes (Caste is a Portuguese word Casta) 1.Brahmins = Intellectual class 2.Kshatriya=Administrative class 3.Vaishya =Entrepreneur class 4.Sudras=Working service class 5.Dal (out class) =Underworld and Mafia. Mainly under target by Gvt. 4 Ashrams in Hinduism 1.Brahmacharya=Student life 2.Grihasta=Married life 3.Vanprasta =Retired life 4.Sanyas=Retire from all social obligations and work to seek God. The Whole Globe follows this above system whether in America or Pakistan or China, above 4 Varnas and 4 Ashrams are followed world wide. Buddha introduced Young unmarried boys of as low as 15 years and 25 Years into Sanyas Ashram. This destroyed social fabric and caused a Silent, Peaceful Genocide of a entire Race of Educated and Administrative elite leaving reproduction to lowest classes like tribals in forests and the Underworld gangsters or Spoilt brats from elite classes. The Masses of Class people just disappeared as All became monks. In Hinduism this Monk business is allowed only after you have passed the Responsibility of life including procreation of next generation and getting your children married. All So Called Buddhist actually follow Hindu social order only as strict adherence to Buddha means, No babies and only Run after Nirvana. Life is not misery but a training. Example :- In Hinduism Pain in Gym =Tapasya to gain HE Body In Buddhism, They want to escape the pain yet want the HE body. Hence in Practice, Hinduism gained. Buddha in Hinduism is a Divine soul and his philosophy inspires us, but ultimately it's the Gita that drives our lives. Escape from pain into Nirvana is basis of Buddhism Pain in life is a part of soul purification and is necessary, as Gold Rod is heated and melted to become ornaments. Escape Pain =Buddhism Experience Pain on path to perfection =Hinduism The Das
The rigid caste system in Hinduism has deeply influenced Indian society for centuries, leading to significant economic consequences. By restricting social mobility and limiting opportunities based on birth rather than merit, the system has hindered workforce efficiency and innovation. Many lower-caste individuals face discrimination, lack access to quality education, and struggle to find well-paying jobs, resulting in widespread poverty and underutilization of human capital. This social divide not only exacerbates inequality but also slows down India's overall economic growth, preventing the country from fully realizing its potential in a rapidly evolving global economy.😢
have you ever read any vedic scripture? if not, then you should not speak what it is or not. And the video above clearly shows how they both have their similarity and differences. you should be more open minded and question even the teachings of buddha and explore other beliefs.
@lestagez Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try. 🤣🤣 Acknowledgement of well validated Hindu/Vedic metaphysics by eminent quantum/astrophysicists ERWIN SCHRODINGER (ONE OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS) Schrodinger's biographer Moore wrote -- “His system - or that of the Hindu Upanishads/Vedas - is delightful and consistent: the self and the world are one and they are all. He rejected traditional western religious beliefs (Jewish, Christian, and Islamic) not on the basis of any reasoned argument, nor even with an expression of emotional antipathy, for he loved to use religious expressions and metaphors, but simply by saying that they are naïve--and will NOT understand Quantum physics and consciousness. (CONSCIOUS, IMMANENT AND OMNIPRESENT SELF = SHIVA and THOUGHTS/BODY/W0RLD/UNIVERSE = SHAKTHI OR INTELLIGENT ENERGY) Erwin Schrodinger wrote: “Vedanta teaches that consciousness is singular, all happenings are played out in one universal consciousness and there is no multiplicity of selves.” Albert Einstein ``Whenever I read Bhagavad Gita, everything else seems superfluous. I've made Vedas as the guide for the formation of my theories and scientific investigation" Werner Heisenberg _ (One of the pioneers in the field of quantum mechanics) - "Quantum ideas which seemed so crazy made sense only after reading hindu/vedic metaphysics" Carl Sagan (Astrophysicist) “The Hindu/Vedic tradition is the world’s greatest tradition dedicated to the idea that the cosmos itself undergoes an immense number of deaths and rebirths. It is the only tradition in which the time scales correspond no doubt to those of modern scientific cosmology. The cycles run from our ordinary day and night to a day and night of Brahma - 8.64 billion years long. It is longer than the age of the Earth, the Sun, and half the time since the Big Bang.” It also means, "Big Bang" does not mean "one time" 'creation" of the universe (out of thin air) around 4004 BCE at 8.30 am in the morning by some transcendent god with a magic wand. 😀😀
@@dakshrao2001 "Buddhism different from Hindu" nope. In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different "codes of conduct" 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm) Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try.
No religion is perfect in its understanding of the divine. There are flaws in all of them. That's why a spiritual journey should be taken alone. Find your own truth, not the truth of someone else.
There is no "versus". Buddhism is just another sect of Sanatan Dharma which the west calls "Hindusism" (Hindu is a geographic label meaning of the Indus area). Other sects are Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktism, Sikhism, Jainism etc much like Lutheran, Baptist, Calvinist, Orthodox Greek, Orthodox Russian are called "Christianity". The faiths evolving in the Indian Subcontinent are all based on Karma, Dharma and Moksha along with yoga and meditation which no other faith in the world shares. Sanatan Dharma means Eternal Law.
In Dhammapada verse 279, the Buddha clearly said "sabbe dhamma anatta" which means all dhamma lacks an unchanging self atta/atman". You still wanna claim Buddha is a branch of vedic religions? The Buddha himself had a lot of arguments and debates with Brahmanists because his teachings were opposite to the Vedas.
@@minthura9053obviously gautham wanted to make a new religion how can he keep everything same as Hinduism?? So thats one of the differentiating point between both religions!! He took points form Hinduism and modified it according to his own thoughts and created Buddhism!! Even Sikhism is similar to Hinduism but they also added thier own 1:08 twist like Buddhism, if Buddhism is exactly same a Hinduism why did it get new name ?? Common sense there should be some differentiating factors to make it mew religion!
@@dhirajreddy56 Sikhism is basically a carbon copy of hinduism, there is nothing original about sikhism whereas Buddhism, Jainism have something to stand upon.
Buddhism, like all knowledge, is actually a branch of the Vedas (what u incorrectly call "Hinduism" n incorrectly claim teaches a birth based caste system when it never mentioned that system except when it correctly predicted society would fall into it). Thus, other than Buddhism not mentioning a creator or permanence, all Buddhist teachings I ever read, are the same as the Vedic. Buddha did talk about Demigods of the Vedas (AKA Angels), heaven, n hell. However, in 5th Veda it correctly predicted God would incarnate to help animals and, "...appear as Lord Buddha, the son of Añjanā, in the province of Gayā, just for the purpose of deluding those who are envious of the faithful theist." 4,000 years? The Vedas were composed OVER 5,000 years ago, but were taught through word of mouth BEFORE that, for countless millennia (to societies that were more advanced than us). Vedas have a history of 4.3 billion Earth years, which they teach is 1 day on a top planet in the universe. Check out those roughly 10,000 year old cities found miles from India in the Ocean (reported by sources like the BBC). Over 5,000 years ago there was a great war involving the powerful rulers of Earth, with the victor becoming basically the Emperor of Earth. The Vedas were the source of the people’s spirituality/schools, politics, farming etc. All math, major sciences, the oldest, most accurate history, predictions that have come true (like of God’s great flood) or are coming or will come true etc. were originally stated in the Vedas. People who followed the Vedas were called Arya (sometimes with "n" at the end) which means noble in the sense of following the Vedas. The "Arya Invasion theory" is faulty speculation. The Vedas warned that the % of people who follow the Vedas, truth, goodness, marriage vows, compassion for animals, etc. decline starting 5,000 years ago, with explanations on why it’d happened (but with a rare golden age that can happen possibly within our lifetime). The Earth's exact measurement as a globe, its 7 continents, Jesus Christ etc. were 1st mentioned in Vedas (e.g. 5th Veda: specifically, the Puranas). Distant planets, Relativity, & the most detailed, accurate, advanced models of creation, evolution, all originated from Vedas. Click the sub, bell icons on youtuber "Playitalready" for upcoming vids with more detail, sources, evidence, insight, n fun. For now, watch his old, ok vids.
@@Quasarrr I appreciate your thanks. I'll try to be open minded to any disagreements u post here or on Playitalready's upcoming, insightful vids. the Buddha did say follow things based on reason n i gotta agree with that.🙏
Modern Hinduism is a later development. Mahabarat, Bhagawath Githa, Valmiki's Ramayana are not older than Buddhissm. Brahamanism developed modern Hinduism to challenge Buddhism and survive. Brahamin Chanakaya's captured Magadha kindom, and Killed Buddhist kings, and they tried to change the history.
@@smlanka4u I'm confused why u ignored everything i said, including facts i touched upon, like how i cited a city mentioned in the Vedas that even the BBC said was recently found n dated as over 10,000 years old, n how i quoted 5th Veda (which Gita n Mahabharata are part of) that correctly predicted Buddha, n how i offer more evidence, etc. n instead, u just make up stuff which, even if some of it is true, u offer 0 proof for? did u read my 1st comment? what if everything in it is true?
@@smlanka4u hehe so you say the Vedas were written by magadha kings and all the polytheistic culture n puraanas of different dieties were written by magadha kings. Even the temples were constructed by magadha kings? Looks someone read alot of Ambedkar twisted history. 🤣🤣🤣
Buddhism is older than "Hinduism" which was a creation of the British. Buddha was also from Nepal, native Nepalese looked "Mongoloid" not Indian. One of the reasons why Buddhism prospered in East and Southeast Asia is due to the similarity of phenotypes between the original Nepalese and other Asiatic peoples.
The oldest archaeological evidence through carbon dating proves Indus valley as the oldest evidence for a civilization which is much more older than when Gautam Buddha was born. There is minimum gap of 1000+ years with Buddhism being newer. Buddhism itself states that it rejects vedas. Which means vedas are older. That is enough proof to suggest that Hinduism which follows vedas is older than Buddhism.
@@OSY_PB_ATHEIST_PALKU Siddharth Gautama, the founder of Buddhism was born after the vedas were already into existence. Buddhism rejects vedas that one doesn't need to perform rituals to attain Moksh. Read in more details about why Buddhism came into existence and when vedas came into existence.
@@mohitpatel9974 Do not argue with me argue with the author that I mentioned. And about vedas there were no archaelogical evidence of it such as manuscripts etc prior to common era. And since buddhism rejected ritualism obviously it rejetcted and will reject all the rituals whether in the past or the future.
@@OSY_PB_ATHEIST_PALKU thank you for proving the point that that Buddhism rejected ritualism. Which is the exact point you need to understand. The ritual that are followed in Hinduism which is actually based on Sanatana Dharma is older than Buddhism. What archeological evidence do you want when you have already accepted that Buddhism rejects ritualism and the Hindus follow the same ritualism, which were being performed before Buddhism was born
Indeed, thank you! So the interesting thing is that Both the Buddha and Christianity evolved in the subcontinent from Sanatan Hinduism. the core belief of Sanatan Hinduism is that once you separate yourself from Maya, then you can attain to the universal consciousness. Congratulations, majority of the world is now Sanatan. But like any mother the parent belief system has to remain silent or phrase all the children.. otherwise fighting breaks out.
Actually Hinduism is Christianity, Islam, Bhuddism, Atheism, any belief you have is a hindu belief, Hinduism is the philosophy of life as we know it. Hinduism as you all agree has evolved and is evolving and will always keep on evolving as we learn more about our universe itself. Every animal, plant or anything is a Hindu. So to say hinduism is seperate from Bhuddism is crazy, because I am a Hindu who is a little bit Bhuddist, a little bit Christian, a little bit Muslim and a little bit Atheist.... So don't try to defy Hinduism, you can't defy reality itself LOL
Actually, Gautam Buddha was not the first Buddha born. There were 27 buddhas before him, in different time periods. There names and time periods can be found in the buddhist religious texts. So Buddhism is lot more ancient than many people realize. The next Buddha is Maitreya buddha.
Nope. Showing tertiary evidence like books doesn't cut it since it can be cooked up by anyone including colonialists. Moreover, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Jain, Buddhist and Sikh) are NOT based on history anyways. They are based on Vedic metaphysics. In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different codes of conduct 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm) Regardless of how many "Buddhas" were there, the original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try.
In Hinduism they worship statue and they believe taking bath in River clear there sins in Buddhism we don’t worship statue or we wash our sins by river .
The core of Hinduism says - no sins can be washed away. The effects can be diluted but for that one has to perform penance by performing good karmas. Those who think that their sins are washed away are just fooling themselves. One can only wash their sins by penance (accepting punishment) or asking for forgiveness from the one they have wronged. + The point of statue is not to worship but to provide an image when one performs mantras or meditation. A mind without a focal point has a very high chance of getting distracted, these idols exist to provide an image for not having that distraction. Most rishis/sages of the Vedic era didn't sit in front of any idol but in front of fire. So this is false info.
@KingBadsha-n6y "worship statue" Buddhists have stone deities of Buddha too in their monastery. Point is in all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh and Jain) there is no concept of god or heaven or hell. So, they revere or venerate stone deities (not worship as god) which symbolically represent Vedic metaphysics, nature, laws of nature including dharma. Hindu temples are also powerful energy centers to reach samadhi by transcending 5 senses and ahamkara (loosely translated as ego in English) Moreover, Buddhism is NOT older than Hindu. Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try. Point is Buddhism (like Jain and Sikh dharmic traditions) is not different from Hindu tradition at the metaphysical level. In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different codes of conduct 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm) But of course, different codes of conduct are followed by them which give them their "identity" misunderstood as different metaphysics.. So, Buddhism is impractical for many due to stricter codes of conduct just like Jain and Sikh traditions. it is the reason why even people who were born in such families don't abide by their strict requirements. But Hindu tradition has more clarity when it comes to different yoga pathways which lead to the same outcome. eg Karma yoga (lead a worldly life but at the same not violate dharma or not create karma/cause and effect) and Sanyasa yoga (complete renunciation)
@@mohitpatel9974 "no sins can be washed away" yes because karma or cause and effect is not the same as "sin" of Abrahamic religions 🤣🤣 1, Karma can be created by any memory or attachment to any action (good and bad) which can lead to reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of immortal and omnipresent self or athma). So, karma is not the same as sin. 2. Hindu tradition has more temples and yoga/meditation techniques (which Buddhists copied including Vipassana from Patanjali's Yoga sutra ) than any other dharmic tradition (including Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) for removing karmic imprints. It also means, stone deities in Hindu temples are not “gods' ' because there is no concept of god or heaven or hell in Hindu tradition. Stone deities are used for 2 reasons. a. They are used as objects of attraction (so given bath, food and decorated with makeup, dress, jewels etc) for focus and meditation (to have vibrational experience) in the presence of Sanskrit mantra vibrations, augmented by temple architecture, sanctum Sanctorum (space where deities are kept) and shape/ posture of deities. Bowing, prostrating and circumambulation (go around deities 7 times in a clockwise direction) simply speed up and expand the vibrational experience. Obviously, some Hindu temples are more powerful energy centers than others e.g. 12 Jyotirlinga temples present in different corners of India. As soon as one enters them, powerful vibrations can be experienced immediately. This technique is for reaching the samadhi state which is nothing but the disappearance of perception of the observer (conscious, immortal and omnipresent athma) and observed (external world or the deity focused on) “duality” momentarily (temple tradition) or temporarily and permanently (in Yoga tradition)."Pranaprathista" "pooja" or ritual should be interpreted as a tool to reach vibrational experience which can eventually lead to the disappearance of the observer/observed split when 5 senses and ahamkara (sense of I) are transcended. Samadhi experience is for "self realization" that you (immortal, conscious and immanent athma) are (already) that (immortal, conscious, omnipresent and transcendent Brahman) - the impassive experiencer but not the doer. Thoughts/ body/world/universe do everything but not experience anything. To understand this key difference is one of the purposes of hindu temples (powerful energy centers) and yoga/meditation. Another purpose is to remove un-manifested seeds of memories (which can lead to karma or cause and effect and reincarnation if unremoved) stored in one of the subtle bodies called Chitta, from millions of past lives so that reincarnation (transmigration of subtle body with memories to another gross body ) can be put an end and moksha (microcosm to macrocosm) can be attained. 2. Stone deities are also symbolic representations of the well validated Vedic metaphysics, nature and laws of nature which maintain the stability and harmony of the universe. a. Some of the rituals are also symbolic like offering flowers (to give up attachment to any desires), bananas (to give up attachment to fruits of achievements) and breaking coconuts (to give up attachment to ego). As far as "ritual powder" or Vibuthi (ash) applied between the 2 physical eyes is concerned, it is nothing but a symbolic reminder that this body is temporary and will be eventually cremated or just to show symbolically (Vibuthi) that intelligent energy manifests as matter in the conscious field of the immortal self (so called opening of the third eye or cosmic eye symbolically shown between the 2 physical eyes) b. In the same way, the tradition also gives importance to the concept of dharma or natural law when it comes to both animate and inanimate which contribute to stability and harmony of the universe..(it is not just about humanity). It is the reason why cows/snakes/monkeys/plants/trees are revered for doing their dharmic duty. Always remember, except human species (which violate dharma or the natural law due to ego and free will) non human species (animate and inanimate) are pre-programmed to follow the natural law or dharma to sustain stability and harmony of the universe.. But religion applies only to humans. There is no religion of electrons, monkeys, plants and galaxies, whereas all of them have their dharma even if they carry it out without intention. In dharmic traditions, the word a-dharma applies to humans who fail to perform righteously; it does not mean refusal to embrace a given set of propositions as a belief system or disobedience to a set of commandments or canons because there is no concept of god in Hindu dharmic tradition
The fact that prayers for healing was banned in Assam india around when this came out is telling non indians that prayers are not for Hinduism. What's the difference between the word prayer in other relgions and in Hinduism? Ragas arent prayers?
"Prayers" are just for veneration and to calm one's mind not for worshiping some stone deity as god because there is no concept of god or heaven or hell in dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh).
@@indianmilitary most ancient religions knew words matter so I looked at prayers as words spoken intended to heal rather than harm. Speaking life over you. I understand Hinduism has various ways and that some worship god as formless rather than an idol.
@@indianmilitary most ancient religions knew words matter so I looked at prayers as words spoken intended to heal rather than harm. Speaking life over you. I understand Hinduism has various ways and that some worship god as formless rather than an idol.
Most of the Hindus says Buddhism is part of Sanatan Dharma and related to Hinduism or Sanatan Dharm....... Buddhism is one of the part of Sanatan Dharma that's truth But Buddhism is totally different from Hinduism✅🤍🤍 some Brahman or Brahmins who can't answered the True meaning of Dhamma to Siddhartha So He just plan to search it and gain it.......... Once Buddha said IT'S WE WHO PUT OURSELVES IN TROUBLES AND MAKE OURSELVES SUFFER ,NO ONE CAN FREE YOU FROM SUFFERING AND PAINS IT'S YOU WHO ARE THE RESPONSIBILE ......and it's the difference between Others religions and Buddhism........ Buddhism don't depends on others and Others religions do✅😊🤍🤍🤍no hatreds
"Buddhism different from Hindu" nope. In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different codes of conduct 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm) Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try.
Hinduism is based on caste system, whereas, Buddhism oppose caste system and therefore even Dr Br AMBEDKAR who is father of Indian Constitution and one of the greatest social reformer which India has produced left hinduism and embraced Buddhism. Infact hindus r responsible to end buddhism in India. Pushmitra sung in 185 bce killed last buddhist emperor. Shashanka burned baudhi tree at Baudh gaya. He even destroyed buddhas footprints which were located at varanasi. Read Vincent Smiths book "Early history of India".
Hinduism doesn't have a caste system it's verna which was created by corrupt pandits who wanted wealth from rulers in order to keep the rulers bloodline ongoing and ruling nation. Bhagvate gita holiest hindu book find a word which says caste or anything related to caste I am ready to convert to Buddhism.
2 . Dr br ambedkar never converted to Buddhism in his own words he said both Buddhism and hindus are part of the same tree. 3. after the death of gautam buddam india started becoming Buddhism and then Acharya ramanuja who went all over india having debate about it and always proved it hinduism is greater in every single way. There was no killing of Buddhism in India It like killing their own people
The last Buddhist emperor was against vedas and was the weakest king in the Asoka dynasty who was against protection of dharma ☸️. He was killed by his army commander who was a Kshatriya.
Let me ask you something about how Buddhism ended in the majority nation of afghanistan, Bangladesh, indonesia , Philippines and malaysia surprisingly these all nations are islamic now why? Buddhism in Afghanistan was 100% population once upon a time and today afghanistan is not even 0.001 percentage Buddhism how and why
Good effort but hindus recognise most of the things you mentioned exclusively for Buddhists here, most so called differences actually don't practically hold up. I'd go so far as to say they both are too similar to call them seperate religion, it's just that Buddhism was a missionary theology and it spread more. However i think if i have pick differences, hindus recognise suffering to be integral part of life but believe life is more than that, there's beauty in world and it's worth the suffering. Hindus also much like Buddhists value renunciation, not just of desires but also of fate to dharma. It's about doing the right thing and leaving the fruits of your actions to Brahman. In this renunciation, man finds true peace and salvation. Hindus come at this from various approaches and have path laid out in theology. They all converge into truth, that's why hindus don't have much problem with Buddhists as they see Buddhists as just one more approach to realising this truth
Title itself is very wrong there is no Hinduism vs Buddhism... coz this are core religions of India... We respect both 🙌 unrespectful is the conversion this Abrahmic religions do to there followers with there unethical ways..
Nope , swarg just simply means where gods live and narak means where the devil lives , normal people don't go there , the soul is reincarnated untill it gets moksha and then stops existing in these merely human forms and become one with this infinite universe
Buddhism is not at all part of hinduism the later is very recent. Those who really wants to know about buddhism should read ambedkar writings and western scholars like bryan levman book pali and buddhism.
@OSY_PB_ATHEIST_PALKU "Buddhism not part of Hindusim" Then you neither understood Buddhism nor Hindu tradition. 🤣🤣 In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different codes of conduct 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm) Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try.
Actually you are right, we are being taught wrongly in history. History books are based on brahmanism and colonialism, we need to check historial evidence.
I don't understand Buddist. Some of them say they are atheist but believe in rebirth. Like who do you think controls and manage your soul after death?. Without god how can you reincarnate?
sorry but I'm not going talk anything for u as buddhist but I have questions who's control the Solar system, day and night or waves at the sea 🤔 I'm not Expert in buddhism because I'm only following buddhism only for way of life but I can tell u this if u sad, feeling aloneness, happy, anything like thag desire U can live this place because u souls have attachment to this world U may die and Reborn in another world or heaven or hell but not able to stop that only your attachment is over then U can live this place as normal person I'm not doing that because I have attachment so i use buddhist teaching as way of live but if i consider i want nirvana then I can start that with stopping my attachment to saddest happiness like emotional and becoming a monk it was different base one one's self
@@sumitraj5280 Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try.
Personally, I side with the Hindus, primarily over the lack of recognition of an ultimate "God/Source/Oneness" by the Buddhist. Nor do I believe the journey of the soul is based on repetitious suffering that repeats with each incarnation and can never be stopped. Once you are enlightened enough to rise above suffering, why does the Soul need to come back to relearn the same lesson over and over?
Of course this video oversimplifies hinduism and Buddhism to stay short and so it doesn't explain everything in detail and leads to some misunderstanding But what Buddhism is teaching is that everything is impermanent and everything exists in interdependence with the rest (a tree for example doesn't exist by itself, it needs soil, sun, water etc... Same logic applies to us and our "self") so there is a sense of Oneness in Buddhism, we just say this oneness is empty of definitive or unchanging nature. that's why we don't believe in a soul as a form of permanent self going from life to another, we talk about an impermanent phenomenon going through death and rebirth over and over because of karma (actions that produce causality), and this Samsara is filled with suffering, not by essence but because of our own approach of it, because we keep trying to possess, reject, or ignore things that are impermanent and inevitably get out of our reach, the suffering comes from this clinging to impermanent phenomenon. So Buddhism doesn't say that a soul comes back to relearn over and over the same lesson, I don't understand how you reach that conclusion. Lord Buddha taught about the cycle of suffering but more importantly he taught about how to break free from it, this is the four Noble Truths: the suffering, the origin of suffering, the cessation of suffering, and the path towards that cessation
@@epoflacko108 I got that from the video, but to be honest, I really don't care enough to watch it again to tell you where in the video. But I certainly wouldn't have come up with it on my own. Best wishes!
Once you are enlightened enough to rise above suffering, why does the Soul need to come back to relearn the same lesson over and over? Because there is a ladder created by karma you can get to the top tier thanks by karma but the karma will be burned and you will fall to the lower tiers again. In buddhism top tier is occupied by gods and titans but they must abide karma and they will burn out the karma and go back to the lower realms look for term Bhavacakra on wiki. Everything has explanation in the karma wheel breaking system.
@@jozefbania I really appreciate the response!!! I read threw it quickly.but I'm walking out the door. When I get back later I'll read it again more carefully. But before I left, I just wanted to thank you for responding!!
The parable of those who reject Faith* is as if one were to shout like a goat- herd, to things that listen to nothing but calls and cries: deaf, dumb, and blind, they are void of wisdom. Holy Quran, chapter 2, Al Baqarah (The Heifer) verse 171. * Islam Allah Subhana Wata'ala; Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
Hindism is part of mahayani buddhist All hindu god also mahayani buddhist god But many indian brahamis people claim Hindusm is older then buddhism But this is totally wrong You cannot fond any evidence of hindism before buddha even before samrath asok I want to challenge all people Give me proof before buddha any archeaology evidence of hindusm. .
There was no Hindu in India during Buddha time. Evidence: not a single mention of Hindu word in Asoka inscriptions all over India. Put Buddha was a khattiya (not Kshatriya) why? Because according to digha nikaya khattiya means lord of the fields (Jo kheto ka Malik ho) and not some Varna identity shit of kshtriya in Brahmanism (Hinduism). During Buddha time no Varna system existed.
Rigveda Samhita was itself 1500 and 1200 BC older. Even more than buddhism. If it is so then how buddha get opportunity to reject Vedas???? Suppose Vedas is essential material of Hinduism ... Hinduism name is new.. but considering buddhism is older than hinduism then it's totally invalid... Buddha born into kshatriya family in shakya clan.... He dad was prince itself. Many gurus come and meet him so how you can say hinduism didn't existed before buddha.... And yeah. Buddhism reformed as a non-theistic way to attain nirvana by meditation.... If hinduism really didn't existed on that time so how he learn this concept???
@@Manoj-vp5in caste system is approach by the later Vedic period corrupt Brahmins 🤦 get knowledge first... You must be Neo-buddhist or with no knowledge
Buddhism is not a religion Buddhism is a free thinker Buddha dont ask you to worship him Buddha is not a creator 100% true fact Buddha dont mix with Hinduism at all cost
You are a fool. Buddhism came from Hinduism! Siddartha who you call Buddha was a Hindu, all his teachings are from the teachings of Hinduism, the word Buddha itself is a SANSKRIT word which is the ancient language of India, so how can you ever say Buddhism came before Hinduism, you are evil! Stop spreading propaganda!
Absolutely not. Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try. Point is Buddhism (like Jain and Sikh dharmic traditions) is not different from Hindu tradition at the metaphysical level. In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different codes of conduct 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm) But of course, different codes of conduct are followed by them which give them their "identity" misunderstood as different metaphysics.. So, Buddhism is impractical for many due to stricter codes of conduct just like Jain and Sikh traditions. it is the reason why even people who were born in such families don't abide by their strict requirements. But Hindu tradition has more clarity when it comes to different yoga pathways which lead to the same outcome. eg Karma yoga (lead a worldly life but at the same not violate dharma or not create karma/cause and effect) and Sanyasa yoga (complete renunciation)
Buddhism came from Hinduism as Gautama was a Brahman. He reached enlightenment through Hindu meditation etc. and taught what worked for him to reach moksha. He never set out to create a new religion. Also this video acts like liberation and moksha are separate things which is obviously not correct. If Buddha came up in the Catholic Church he would be a Saint, but still a Christian. Instead he was a Hindu who became a saint but a whole religion was made. Buddhahood is Shivahood and vice versa there is no difference. The real buddist were the Mahasiddhas and Tantrics who share the same Tantric philosophy as their Hindu Tantric counterparts. Om ah hum vajra guru padma siddhe hum, Om Shiva Gorak Aadesh🙏🏼🔱
@@GD-tn3ezHinduism has female goddesses who are revered so there is respect for woman. Sati is not mentioned in scriptures. If you saw oct 7th of what Hamas did, that is what happened in Mughal invasion and thus sati as a practice was born before that it didn't exist. Sati is another name of Shiva's wife the trinity of Hinduism. So sati is a name of goddess, before invasion it was a name only and not a practice. Caste system doesn't exist, Varna system is totally different. Varna वर्ण means character/sound equivalent is what you call alphabet. Varnamaala वर्णमाला - character chain Varnaviched वर्णविच्छेद - character spelling (like breaking a word and spelling each individual letter) Varnasamyog वर्णसंयोग - character combination Varna is a root word thus it retains its meaning in other words without its meaning being changed so caste is a false translation. It is laughable to think that racism is components of Hinduism when most of Hindus are brown, and also some of the goddesses are dark coloured like Maa Kaali (adishakti avatar) Components of Hinduism are 4 Purusarthas, 7 Main chakras, 3 Gunas, 4 yogas (paths to salvation) don't spread your thoughts based on half knowledge.
But we can all agree that the people who follow these religions make the most delicious food
Hahaaaa😂
We used to have an Indian restaurant near me. The lamb was delicious and the owner sometimes went around giving customers free alcohol. Whether he was correcting Karma or working on Dharma I do not know. But when my wife drinks I benefit 😎
Beautiful flowers might looks to different from tree, soil and fertilizer but molecularly same. So debates aren't beneficial everywhere specially organized by social media and narratives..
some people would think of it as not being inclusive.. quick, praise everyone now..
Not me. I’m a terrible cook 🤣
It was very nice, I can't wait to learn more about Hinduism!!...
I would take this channel's teachings on "Hinduism" with a "grain of salt."
Buddhism, like all knowledge, is actually a branch of the Vedas, but over time, teachings change due to time, place, circumstance, etc.
Watch the "Eternal Religion" vid n its description by youtuber "Playitalready" which is currently his main vid, then click his sub n bell icons for some EPIC vids in the future that are more detailed, well sourced, interesting, n HD. Comment there because youtube's A I removes comments a lot, but Playitalready tries to UN remove comments directed to me, or him.
Also youtube search "Scientific Verification of Vedic Knowledge--Full Length" by Stephen Knapp.
Let me know if this comment, helped.
Here's a sneak preview . . .
*Rig Veda 10.96.8* "At the swift draught, the Iron One with yellow beard and yellow hair"
*Rig Veda 1.100.18* “Indra attacked the Dasyus and the Śimyus; won the land, sunlight, and water with his white-complexioned friends”
*Rig Veda 1.103.3* “Armed with the thunderbolt, he has gone on destroying the cities of the Dasyus, and augment the strength and glory of the Ārya.”
*Rig Veda. 2.20.6* "Indra, the slayer of Vrittra, has scattered the Dasyu sprang from a b______ womb."
*Rig Veda 9.73.5* “They have roared in unison, burning up riteless men, Blowing away the b______ skin which Indra hates.”
I am seeing some people writing that Sanatan dharma (Hinduism) has CASTE SYSTEM which is wrong Hinduism has Varna system which based on karma but it became caste system which was based upon birth..............NO HINDU TEXT PROMOTES INEQUALITY AMONG PEOPLE.....ITS PEOPLE'S FAULT
Still its practiced only among Hindus. Which is why buddha was right. Hindusim does not lead to Enlightement. How could it ? By creating inequality among people ?
@@n.sadequi4381 Again it's the people who create inequalities among themselves............There are over 1.1 to 1.2 billion Hindus and 90% don't promote this man made system who are in India,Nepal, Mauritius , Indonesia , newly converts etc........who feel purpose in there life and feel that they are getting closer to enlightenment with different ways...................
@@n.sadequi4381lmao like buddha completely reject caste system.
Read his views on intercaste marriage in angulimala sutta u will know.
@@n.sadequi4381that's not Hinduism fault it's people do islam accounts for each terrorist
Didn't found anything wrong? Maybe you are reading some wrong interpretation.
I,am froudfull but I am Hindu from Bangladesh 🇧🇩
Original religion of sidhaarth gautama was Hinduism only after enlightenment awakening he was called buddha and followers are called Buddhist following culture and practice is called Buddhism.
Siddhartha was living in a Royal family. They didn't have a religion. Early Brahamanism survived with the help of modified texts like Mahabharat, Valmiki's Ramayan, Bhagawath geetha after the Chandraguptha's invation.
@@smlanka4u😂
💐THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God saves man from the destruction of this old world"
(This may be a reminder for most people of God's words from Genesis: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness." Suppose God is saying that "let us" make man in "our " picture, then "ours" shows two or more; since He said "ours," then God is not only one. In this way, man begins to think generally of different persons, and from these words came the idea of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. At the time Moses wrote Genesis, it was after the creation of mankind following the creation of the world. In the beginning, when the world, Moses did not exist yet. And it was a long time before Moses wrote the Bible, so how could he possibly know what God said in heaven? He was unaware of how God created the world. What is written in the Old Testament is the work of Jehovah, a phase of the work of God Himself for ushering in the Age of Law. This is the work of God, where as He spoke, it happened, and as He commanded, it remained. When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. When man speaks of separate persons, does it not reflect God? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Doesn't the Spirit of God simply carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives?" Because of this, there is no distinction between persons.)
Almighty God said
This can be a REMINDER for most PEOPLE of GOD'S WORDS from GENESIS: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." Suppose GOD says "we" will CREATE MAN in "our" IMAGE, then "we" SHOWS TWO or MORE; since He SAID "we," then GOD is NOT one. IN THIS WAY, MAN BEGAN TO THINK GENERALLY OF DIFFERENT PERSONS, AND FROM THESE WORDS HAD THE IDEA OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. What then does the Father look like? What does the Son look like? And what does the Holy Spirit look like? ☀️🙏
Could it be that the present man was made in the image of the one who was put together from the three? Then is the image of man like that of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? 🙏
WHICH of the persons of GOD is the image of MAN? This idea of MAN is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and NONSENSE! It can only separate one God from several Gods. 🙏
AT THE TIME Moses WROTE GENESIS, it was AFTER MANKIND WAS CREATED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE WORLD. In the BEGINNING, when the WORLD began, Moses did NOT exist. And IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR MOSES TO WRITE THE BIBLE, so HOW could he possibly KNOW WHAT GOD SAID in HEAVEN?🙏☀️
He is UNCONSCIOUS of HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLD. 🙏
In the OLD TESTAMENT of the Bible, there is NO mention of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, only the TRUE GOD, JEHOVAH, is PERFORMING His WORK in ISRAEL. ☀️
He is CALLED by different NAMES in the CHANGING TIMES, but this DOESN'T PROVE that each NAME REFERES to a different PERSON. Therefore, then wouldn't there be countless persons of God? What is WRITTEN in the OLD TESTAMENT is the WORK of JEHOVAH, A PHASE of the WORK of GOD HIMSELF for the START of the Age of Law. This is GOD'S WORK, where ACCORDING to what He SPOKE, it happened, and ACCORDING to what He commanded, it REMAINS. 🙏💐
AT NO TIME DID JEHOVAH SAY HE WAS THE FATHER WHO WOULD COME TO EFFECT THE WORK, or did He even foretell the coming of the Son to redeem mankind. WHEN IT CAME TO THE TIME OF JESUS, it was only mentioned that GOD became MAN to REDEEM ALL MANKIND, NOT that the SON CAME. ☀️
Because the times are not the same and the work that God Himself carries out is also different, He has to carry out His work within different kingdoms. In this way, the identity He represents is also different. PEOPLE BELIEVE JEHOVAH IS THE FATHER OF JESUS, but JESUS DOESN'T REALLY ACKNOWLEDGE, saying: "We were never identified as Father and Son; I and the Father in heaven are one. The Father is in Me and I am in the Father; when men see the Son, they see the Father in heaven." ☀️😪
When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. By the time man attempts to explain, matters are complicated by the idea of different persons, as well as the relationship between Father, Son, and Spirit. WHEN MAN TALKS ABOUT separate persons, does it not reflect GOD? 🙏🔅
Man even ranks persons as first, second, and third; these are all mere human understandings, unworthy of reference, and utterly unreal! If you ask him: "How many are there in God?" He will say that God is the Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: the one true God. If you ask him: "Who is the Father?" He will say: The Father is the Spirit of God in heaven; He rules over all, and He is the Lord of heaven." "Then is Jehovah the Spirit?" ☀️
He will say: "Yes!" If you ask him afterwards, "Who is the Son?" He will say that Jesus is the Son, anyway: "Then what is the story of Jesus? From whom did He come?" He will say: "Jesus was born of Mary through the shadowing of the Holy Spirit. " ☀️
"Then is not His substance also Spirit? Does His work also represent the Holy Spirit?
Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Now in the last days, it goes without saying that the Spirit still works; how did He become different persons? Doesn't the Spirit of God just carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives? Because of this, there is no difference between personas. 🙏
From "Is There a Trinity?"
Fulfilled in "In the beginning He was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). ... and "When I looked up, someone handed me a book wrapped in a scroll. I opened it and I read on both sides the prayers, lamentations, and curses." (Ezekiel 2:9-10). ... "His garment was stained with blood. He was called the "Word of God" (Rev. 19:13).
The kingdom He brought down and set up in the highest in the sky so that it can occupy His creation in the universe and engrave on it the entirety of His Holy name "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD" 💐 fulfillment of (Mat. 16:18) "And I say as for you, you are Peter, on top of this rock I will build my Church, that even the power of death will not prevail over it.". ... and "The Letter to the Church in Philadelphia" (Rev. 3:7-13). ... And fulfillment of "The New Jerusalem" 💫 "The Spirit enveloped me, and the angel led me to the top of a very high mountain. He showed Me Jerusalem, the Holy City, coming down from heaven from God." (Rev. 3:7-13). ... " For the time has come in the house of God for the beginning of judgment in the house of God." (1 Peter 4:17). ... It is fulfilled that God Himself is our Pastor in (Rev. 7:17) 💐
"For the Lamb in the midst of the throne will be their PASTOR. He will lead them to springs of life-giving water; and God will wipe away the tears from their eyes"
📩 Calling and leading the sheep of God to His glorious Throne "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD"💐 to submit again to His authority so that He will continue to teach, guide and protect even in plague, famine and wild animals will not be moved by it and completely win this final battle with the big red dragon!
"They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and it will be fulfilled that will be established above the sky/RUclips in (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . . . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace."✉️ 💌
Yeah Siddhartha probably left Hinduism because of the barbaric caste system and untouchability, which is still there and some idiotic hindus still justify it. 🤮
Buddha ejected atman, still can be Hindu?wow
Hinduism is totally different from Buddhism. Hinduism has no particular one origin. There are many devas in Hindu. Where as Buddhism emerged only from Gautama Buddha thats why its called Buddhism.
No its same first thing is Buddha was born in hindu family but he was against Verna system of hinduism and many things in world so when he got enlightened he bacame buddha after his death his followers started to called as Buddhist. Buddhism don't believe in god but they believe in same thing like Hindus Liberatation , multiverse and all .They also believe in devi dewtas but not in supreme god like hindus. But its also a fact that different country follows Buddhism different with the touch of their pegan belief like japan .If you go to Nepal , Darjeeling and sikkim you will find different Buddhism that south East. They follow mixture of Hinduism and Buddhism and Hindu of theses palces also follows different hinduism than Minland India they follows hinduism mixture with Buddhism and shamanism.
Buddhist teachings not only come from Gautama, but from other buddhas as well, its just that Gautama's teachings are central and the most important
Yes.
As a once wester Christian I have taking something from both without knowing about them. One God, service to others, meditation, KARMA, reincarnation and so on. I have my own path. I believe to follow any religion is restrictive.
From my study, I've found Christ to be the most reliable person to know about God and the path of Salvation( which is a free gift), through the historical evidence for Jesus' life, death n reserruction. No other religion has such validity as Christianity. And no other religion gives you the assurance of Salvation but Christianity. May Jesus bless and lead you and your loved ones to Him.
@@dutchkittensten1079Resurrection is myth
@@seekjustice-gp2xi Why do you think so?
@@seekjustice-gp2xi Resurrection _is_ REAL. The Egyptian Osiris; the Greek Adonis and Dionysus, Canaanite, Ba'al; the Phrygian Attis; Mesopotamian Tammuz; Iranian Mithras all died and came back to life . . . centuries before the Bible was written.
@@dutchkittensten1079 Are you sure? . . . *Matthew 10:34-35* “Do NOT suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a *SWORD*. For I have come to turn a man _against_ his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law."
*Matthew 10:37* “Anyone who loves their father or mother more than me is NOT worthy of me; anyone who loves their son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.”
*Luke 14:26* “If anyone comes to me and does not *HATE* their father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters - yes, even their own life - such a person can NOT be my disciple."
So Buddha learned about other religions first, maybe Hinduism too since it's oldest religion in the world, before he realized they were wrong path (not leading to nirvana, enlightenment, peaceful lasting state), so he went out on his own; and after 6 long years of starving and hunger (almost killed himself), he followed the middle path, middle way which eventually led him to enlightment and of course nirvana after he passed, forever left earth. No one no being is quite like Buddha 😊
Another reactionary religion to Hinduism is Jainism
Buddhism or Hinduism is not a religion both are new words derived centuries after these culture have arrived
Indian culture which you call budhism or Hinduism has dities & Salvation from karma is target of both Hindus & Buddhist also there's no difference only difference is budhism in atheist school is ancient times
Did you not see the last part? To break free from Samsara (cycle of rebirth) in Hinduism is called Moksha and the same in Buddhism is called Nirvana. Moksha and Nirvana are one and the same. Buddha was a Hindu prince who wanted a simpler solution to lifes problems so he created Buddhism and the 8 rules. Hinduism is more complex and deals with also the scientific aspect of the universe. There are no real Gods in Hinduism just manifestations of the forces of the universe and of human character example Shiva and Brahma represents the renewal of the universe through destruction and creation. Krishna represents a human of great moral integrity.
@@ashleysilver5594WHY GOD NEED TO BE MANISFESTED?
@@sokTAU911 To preserve Dharma. Who is Buddha? Buddha is not Siddhartha Gautama, so who is Buddhas human body manifesting? Is it no one special? If it isn't then why do we give any significance do his teachings? Krishna is the same, he is God manifested as a teacher. They are not the same if you start to go into the technicalities of their births into this world and what they explicitly describe themselves to be, but they are the same in that they are both a profound wisdom and intelligence manifested in Samsara, and that they both teach Dharma.
Very well drawn out and understandable
I'm having a test on this tomorrow morning. Thanks.
Good luck! Hopefully the video helps!
As an agnostic atheist born in Brazil (a western country), learning how eastern religions work is really interesting and fun, I knew that Buddhism and Hinduism had something in common but I wanted to know their main differences, because they're some of the unique religions that I do respect and see some utility for life (unlike christianity or islam, which are awful and totally contemptous). Amazing video and keep up the good work!
core concept is same . also being atheist is also a practice of hinduism means you dont believe in god but only nature or whatever. also there is nothing in bhudhism which is not present in hinduism just have diff name . i myself from the place of bhudha where this religion started . i dont ubderstand why people think its all different specially non INDIAN SUCONDINENT AND NON TIBETIAN AS WELL.i dont even no about all this division in my chldhood not only bhudhism but my place gave birth to one more religion janism which is also have same core concept bt its some knowledge you will not find in bhudhism but it s in hinduism . so basically all ancient Indian knowledge come under hinduism and bhudhism and janism hold some of its part . as native to this land we dont discriminate btw these three including shikhism so pls stop you all . bhudhism spread across asia becouse hindu king and buisnessmen donate them also help them in travel {buisnessmans help} as you know both have monks at that time they both consider as same but due to mughal invasion and many cast or diff groups in bhudhism started fight btw themselves and look down on each other as hindu also used to face during british era becouse due to being officially registred it becomes rigid . so so by this all factor bhusist converted back in hinduism and its different believes now follow in different part dippending which group spread bhusism there . but tibetian know it just outsider non bhusist or recently converted are rude . so pls follow its concept not hat. i wrote it to fast so sorry for any mistakes . have a nice day and do yoga good for your health as it not connected to any of these religion its practice of this land. ok if you can guess my gender by name . sorry for this much big parragraph people say i talk to much and so fast . so also in typing . maye mistakes are more becouse i am wrighting on my laptop .if possible also my age just a small task for you for sharp memory just kidding sorry for my foolinesh.
You believe in the following fairy tales, right?
Everything in the universe magically came from nothing, fish ancestors, Imaginary worlds ( multiverse), and science fictional characters ( aliens) etc,.
@@REMIEL532 hypocrite
Good quick overview. Thx.
Thanks a lot 👍
You are welcome
Sir, I have a question, is the Japanese religion Shintoism also a part of Hinduism because Shinto Gods are very similar to Hindu Gods?
No, Shintoism have nothing to do with Hinduism but Taiwanese Taoism Gods are believed have some Prototypes from Hinduism
@@hugocheng6243 Sir, you have not heard much about Shinto religion and Hindu religion, I have been studying for a long time and I know that the names of many Shinto Gods and their functions are the same. Like Lord Kangiten Also Known As Binayaka-Ten Is Looks Like Hindu God Lord Ganesha Also Known As Vinayaka,
And Yenma The God Of Death In Shinto Religion Is Looks Like Yama The God Of Death In Hindu Religion
Kind of. Eastern writers usually called hinduism and shintuism and intoism in their writings.
Not Hinduism but Bodhisattva of Buddhism @@hugocheng6243
@@adityaeditzz8879this gods are inspired by mahayan Buddhism not Hinduism
cool illustration ❤
I wouldn't say that meditation is central to Buddhism, but just one integrated part of the Eightfold Path. Most Buddhists worldwide don't even have a meditation practice. It's something that became amplified to the point of being synonymous with Buddhism only when Zen, which _is_ heavily focused on meditation, came to the West, and people took Zen to be what _all_ Buddhism looks like.
Its funny how Buddhism has been warped to suit different cultures. For example one of the rules of the 8 fold part is Right Conduct or Action: That means no killing or injuring any creature, no taking what is not given, no sexual misconduct, no material desires. But some Buddhists do eat meat which is wrong.
@@ashleysilver5594 Eating meat is not prohibited in every Buddhist tradition. There's a reason for that in some schools such as Theravada tradition.
Very accurate statement!
Yes, exactly. A kind of liberal, non supernatural based Zen teaching is what became famous in US, but that doesn't represent Buddhism at all. Most Buddhism speaks a lot about demons, hells, ghosts, which Zen largely leaves out.
Meditation is the path to liberation. Without it, you can not truly practice buddhism.
Meditation is the path to liberation. Without it, you can not truly practice buddhism.
3:18 "buddhists don't have a caste system" well look into Sri Lanka they did have(Govigamas etc.) and that's considered the "most buddhist" country
While Sri Lanka had a caste system, it is not as hierarchical as the Hindu caste system.
@@Desertfox18you probably havent read buddhist tripitakas then
Buddha considered kshatriyas as the highest caste
@@antiabrahamicreligionhe was kshatriya himself....
Also said "shudrakool" can't become buddhist
Liar... give source (sutta) which says sudrakoola can't be monk or Buddhist...Liar@@jaisinghrajput2995
@@jaisinghrajput2995 Only Europeans can become Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishas . . .
*Rig Veda 10.23.4* "With him is this rains: Indra throws drops of moisture on his yellow beard"
*Rig Veda 1.100.18* “Indra attacked the Dasyus and the Śimyus; won the land, sunlight, and water with his white-complexioned friends”
*Rig Veda 1.130.8* “Indra defends his Ārya worshiper. He consumes the malignant; he tore off the b_______ skin; and him who delights in cruelty.”
*Rig Veda 2.20.7* “Indra, the slayer of Vṛtra, destroyer of cities, has scattered the b______-sprung servile.”
*Rig Veda 9.73.5* “They have roared in unison, burning up riteless men, Blowing away the b______ skin which Indra hates.”
❤super documentary ❤
Buddhism is to ascetic for most ppl, thats also why Indian Kings and the masses chose Hinduism with it's devotional path, in favor of Buddhism. Also Hindu concepts and practises are increasing in the West whereas ppl in the West only have icon of Buddha at home but dont really practise the religion.
Buddhism isn't ascetic. Buddhism rejects both asceticism and hedonism, and accepts the middle way.
@@The_Alchemist_007 and still to ascetic for the lay men. Hence Hinduism is broader as it is suitable for everybody.
One of the greatest Kings in indian history chose buddhism over hinduism.. even buddhism was the dominant religion in that era without the force.. but Hindus(brahmins) couldn't do anything so they adopted buddha as an avatar of Vishnu.. after extremist mughlas and Hindus buddhism vanished.. One of the main reasons why it was easy to vanish is buddhsim isn't forcefully practiced by people... every people got equal rights while hindusim teaches castes😢.. how some can be a sinner or a lower form of human because of their birth place/caste..? Karma doesn't work that way.. someone's birth caste is not how their whole life should be.. bad karma so bad place to birth.. that's it.. they too can achieve pure goals in life..but brahmins made a concept that someone's birth caste is their whole identity.. till death it is their sin..😢
@@ChannaJayawardhana-h1o Take a deep breath kid, and let’s analyze actual Buddha and core Buddhist works, (Tipiṭakas) rather than works of irrelevant and biased people. I have taken translations not my own, but from passionate scholars, who have tried their best to translate the verses politically correct. It is not ironical that still, the verses translated do reek of Buddha’s psyche.
“In the past, brahmins coupled only with brahmin women, not with non-brahmin women. But now brahmins couple with both brahmin women and non-brahmin women . Dogs, how ever, still couple only with female dogs, not with other female animals. This is the first ancient brahmin practice that is now seen among dogs but not among brahmins.”
Aṅguttaranikāya (tipiṭaka) 3.221, trans. Bikkhu Bodhi.
"And how, Doṇa, is a brahmin similar to a deva? Here, a brahmin is well born of both his maternal and paternal sides, of pure descent, unassailable and impeccable with respect to birth as far back as the seventh paternal generation. He lives the spiritual life of virginal celibacy for forty-eight years, studying the hymns. He then seeks a teacher's fee for his teacher solely in accordance with the Dhamma, not contrary to the Dhamma.
And what, Dona, is the Dhamma in that case? Not by agriculture, not by trade, not by raising cattle, not by archery, not by service to the king, not by a particular craft, but solely by wandering for alms without scorning the alms bowl. Having offered the teacher's fee to his teacher, he seeks a wife solely in accordance with the Dhamma, not contrary to the Dhamma. And what, Dona, is the Dhamma in that case? Not by buying and selling, [he takes] only a brahmin woman given to him by the pouring of water. He couples only with a brahmin woman, not with a khattiya woman, a vessa woman , a sudda woman , or a candala woman, nor with a woman from a family of hunters, bamboo workers, chariot makers, or flower scavengers…”
Aṅguttara, 3.226 trans. Bhikku Bodhi
In the following verses, he calls such fallen Brahmins who don’t observe moral and racial purity as “caṇḍālas of Brahmins”. Aah, so non racist.
Could anyone locate such a verse saying this explicitly from any pre Buddhist scripture in India?
One often quoted (cherry picked) text is Assalāyana sutta where Buddha accuses Brahmins of claiming themselves to be high in caste, and counters a teen reverent Brahmin boy Assalāyana with his always amazing sentences. An anti Brahmanic India of twentieth century and forth saw much of the verses as against Brahmin supremacy. But, what does Buddha believe Brahmins should have did better? His tactics to convert Brahmins is though, always amazing.
(Assalāyana) : Is that son born of the brahmin prince and warrior maiden, according to the father known a `brahmin' or according to the mother known a `warrior? Good Gotama, that son born of the Brahmin prince and the warrior maiden, according to the father should be known a `brahmin' and according to the mother a `warrior.
(Buddha) : Assalàyana, to a mare and donkey a mule is born, according to the mother should it be known a'horse' or according to the father should it be known a `donkey'?
(Assalāyana) : Good Gotama, it's from a thoroughbred that a pony is born. Now I see the difference, in the earlier examples I did not see any difference.
Wow. This logic had deep entry into contemporary societies.
It would be interesting to link why non Brahmanic communities in India took to strict endogamy, while Brahmins were ready to marry any other community, or even accept them into varna system for a social good.
It is so funny to read the Sutta in Majjhima Nikāya. The Buddhists pester a poor teen boy whom they speak of as learned in three Vedas, for a debate with Buddha, of a claim which Buddha himself makes. Even after Assalāyana says several times that Gotama who speaks Dhamma can’t be countered, the Buddhists still force him, and he comes to Buddha with a group of Brahmins and shares a humble and polite talk. Assalāyana says, for the sake of debate that Brahmins say they are pure castes, others aren’t. (Same thing repeated, burdened on the Brahmins by Buddha everywhere) To which Buddha provides his ready made examples to show how Brahmins are impure. His statements start with this (2.149) :
Now, Assalayana, the brahmin women are seen having their periods, becoming pregnant, giving birth, and giving suck. And yet those who are born from the wombs of the brahmin women say thus: 'Brahmins are the highest caste...brahmins alone are the sons of Brahma, the offspring of Brahma, born of his mouth, born of Brahma, created by Brahma, heirs of Brahma.
This one beginning statement is enough to see what kind of purity Buddha had in his mind. Though he becomes more vocal of “social equality” in the forthcoming sentences, to establish that purification ceremonies must be for all, and not just Brahmins. But his this attitude was only when against what he thought himself as the claims of Brahmins. Similar to how contemporary Brahmin scholars themselves “bashed” Samaṇas in their works. Buddha wasn’t any different from them. But surely, Buddha attributes one thing to Brahmins as their claim, them being “fairer”. This stuff is absent in all Brahmanic scriptures. Rather, it also cuts the way to understand Buddha’s psyche of what he thought inside as superior.
At certain times, Buddha would speak more openly of Kshatriyas to be superior to Brahmins. It is not a secret that Buddhism was mouthpiece of Kshatriyan supremacy which wanted to enter not just its stronghold of ruling, but also economy and religion.
In the Ambattha sutta, a young kid doesn’t apparently “venerate Buddha” to the extent what Buddha wanted. On asking, Ambattha is shown to reply that Brahmins usually show such kind of respects only to another Brahmin, but not to lowly people, “dark fellows” (that is a Buddhan fantasy) and so on. To which Buddha replies Ambattha is ill bred. A triggered kid, says that Shakyas are the menial ones who don’t even honour any Brahmin or pay respect to them. Buddha becomes more triggered, as Shakya is his own clan.
A triggered Buddha says :
And what family do you then, Ambattha, belong to?'
'I am a Kanhâyana.'
'Yes, but if one were to follow up your ancient name and lineage, Ambattha, on the father's and the mother's side, it would appear that the Sâkyas were once your masters, and that you are the offspring of one of their slave girls. But the Sâkyas trace their line back to Okkâka the king ….
…
Now Okkâka had a slave girl called Disâ. She gave birth to a black baby. And no sooner was it born than the little black thing said, "Wash me, mother. Bathe me, mother. Set me free, mother, of this dirt. So shall I be of use to you."
'Now just as now, Ambattha, people call devils "devils," so then they (Śākyas) called devils "black fellows" (kanhe). And they said: "This fellow spoke as soon as he was born. 'Tis a black thing (kanha) that is born, a devil has been born!" And that is the origin, Ambattha, of the Kanhayanas. He was the ancestor of the Kanhâyanas. And thus is it, Ambattha, that if one were to follow up your ancient name and lineage, on the father's and on the mother's side, it would appear that the Sâkyas were once your masters, and that you are the offspring of one of their slave girls.'
That was a bold attack by Buddha on this young person. And he was asked to counter this legend. Which he couldn’t. 😅
Now go somewhere else kid to spread youre ignorant propoganda against Hinduism and the Brahmins. 🤣🤣🤣
before 7 century your hinduam is not exist in indian and Nepal
You don't have any archeaology evidence of hindusm before buddha even before samrath asok
It’s important to note that Buddhism is extremely diverse. There is a multitude of different schools/traditions of Buddhism present today. It has an exceptional ability to be accepted and transformed by each new culture it encounters. That’s why there’s so many “Flavors” of Buddhism so if you’re interested do some research and find a tradition that resonates most with you.
"Extremely diverse" But it does not mean valid. Any "diverse" views which contradict well validated Vedic metaphysics Sankhya (which combines Advaitha and Dvaitha) can be discarded or ignored. Sankhya Vedic metaphysics can be validated by logic, double slit quantum experiment and embodied experience. The same rule applies to other "dharmic traditions" as well like Hindu, Sikh and Jain with "diverse" views.
In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different codes of conduct 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm)
But of course, different codes of conduct are followed by them which give them their "identity" misunderstood as different metaphysics.. So, Buddhism is impractical for many due to stricter codes of conduct just like Jain and Sikh traditions. it is the reason why even people who were born in such families don't abide by their strict requirements. But Hindu tradition has more clarity when it comes to different yoga pathways which lead to the same outcome. eg Karma yoga (lead a worldly life but at the same not violate dharma or not create karma/cause and effect) and Sanyasa yoga (complete renunciation)
Point is you can't call yourself a "Buddhist" since you do "vipassana" in the morning and evening just like some Hollywood actors. 🤣🤣You got to follow renunciation and become a Buddhist monk. 🤣🤣
Good video, do one on Unitarian Universalist, Baha’i, Zen, Confucianism, Tao, Shinto, Jewish religion, Jainism, Christadelphians, Gnostics
Great ideas! I do have a video on World Religions you might like.
Some info guys..
SANATAN DHARMA (Hinduism) is a pluralistic religion and a way of life which accepts one god ( formless,cannot be described) with many forms ( shiva , vishnu ,brahma,shakti etc ) and god also decended on earth (ram and krishna) to give us the message and importance of dharma...........Athiest and agnostics can also practice the religion as we have many philosophies what matters and unites every sect of hinduism is *that we should follow our dharma
*Respect every scripture and vedas are most divine scripture of hindus....
Many more things like dualism,non dualism ,nature worship etc.....
Great video
Very interesting! A conversation starter at the least..
It's a nice vid to talk on. it's "incomplete" n inaccurate.
Buddhism is really a branch of the Vedas (what he incorrectly refers to as "Hinduism" n incorrectly claims teaches a birth based caste system when Vedas never mentioned that system except when it correctly warned that society would fall into it). Thus, other than Buddhism not mentioning a creator n permanence, all Buddhist teachings I ever read, are consistently Vedic.
Buddha did talk about Demigods of the Vedas (AKA Angels), heaven, n hell. However, in 5th Veda it correctly predicted God would incarnate to help animals and, "...appear as Lord Buddha, the son of Añjanā, in the province of Gayā, just for the purpose of deluding those who are envious of the faithful theist."
4,000 years? The Vedas were composed OVER 5,000 years ago, but were taught through word of mouth BEFORE that, for countless millennia (to societies that were more advanced than us). Vedas have a history of 4.3 billion Earth years, which they teach is 1 day on a top planet in the universe. Check out those roughly 10,000 year old cities found miles from India in the Ocean (reported by sources like the BBC).
Over 5,000 years ago there was a great war involving the powerful rulers of Earth, with the victor becoming basically the Emperor of Earth. The Vedas were the source of the people’s spirituality/schools, politics, farming etc. All math, major sciences, the oldest, most accurate history, predictions that have come true (like of God’s great flood) or are coming or will come true etc. were originally stated in the Vedas. People who followed the Vedas were called Arya (sometimes with "n" at the end) which means noble in the sense of following the Vedas. The "Arya Invasion theory" is faulty speculation.
The Vedas warned that the % of people who follow the Vedas, truth, goodness, marriage vows, compassion for animals, etc. decline starting 5,000 years ago, with explanations on why it’d happened (but with a rare golden age that can happen possibly within our lifetime). The Earth's exact measurement as a globe, its 7 continents, Jesus Christ, the most detailed, accurate, advanced models of creation, evolution, etc all were 1st mentioned from Vedas.
Click the sub, bell icons on youtuber "Playitalready" for upcoming vids with more detail, sources, evidence, insight, n fun. For now, watch his old, ok vids.
The four Dharmic religions (Hindu-Buddhist-Jain-Sikhism) native to the land of Bharat share ideas of Karma, Dharma, Samsara, Moksha, and Yoga.
These religions share many similarities in core beliefs, modes of worship, and associated practices with 'Om' being the highest energy source. Ek Omkar.
In Buddhism Dhamma is the Prakrit word for the Sanskrit word Dharma and in Jainism, the word "Dharma" is termed as 'dharmastikaay' and In Sikhism called 'Dharman'.
Respect all the 4 🙏
All these four coexisted.
Actually sanatan is also Buddhist word, es dhammo sanantano. It was later stolen by Brahmins after Buddhism perished away.
@@Manoj-vp5indig into topics deeper or actually visit and talk with the ones who follow it. Buddhism was born by rejecting vedas, saying one doesn't necessarily need knowledge for moksh (which is true) knowledge does help but isn't necessary. Sanskrit is one of the oldest language and still prevails to this day and many languages are derived from it. Sanatan is a Sanskrit word. Whether it is Pali or any other devanagari scripts all are derivatives of Sanskrit. The evidence of Sanskrit dates back to 1500 BCE while for Pali it dates back to 3rd/5th century BCE.
@@mohitpatel9974 What happened in 1,500 BCE? *Rig Veda 10.23.4* "With him is this rains: Indra throws drops of moisture on his yellow beard"
*Rig Veda 1.100.18* “Indra attacked the Dasyus and the Śimyus; won the land, sunlight, and water with his white-complexioned friends”
*Rig Veda 1.130.8* “Indra defends his Ārya worshiper. He consumes the malignant; he tore off the b_______ skin; and him who delights in cruelty.”
*Rig Veda 2.20.7* “Indra, the slayer of Vṛtra, destroyer of cities, has scattered the b______-sprung servile.”
*Rig Veda 9.73.5* “They have roared in unison, burning up riteless men, Blowing away the b______ skin which Indra hates.”
@@funnyman8656no they didn't
Buddhism doesn't even exist in India anymore
Thank you
You're welcome
Wonderful
Thank you! Cheers!
Wow, you are drawing a mosque instead of temple. And Indian map is not a correct one
Pakistan chali jaao
That temple looks like taj mahal, that's how muslim invasions affected us....
@@Sheshnaga We have to depromote tajmahal.
@@gouthamkrishnan6718 we shouldn't depromote it, we should promote the mandirs more which look far better and far older
@@Sheshnaga We should promote mostly rajasthani forts and palaces and south Indian temples as our Indian monuments when it comes to tourism,these are all fully indian style monuments and more majestic looking unlike tajmahal.But our tourism Industry people in India only promote mughal made monuments in delhi and agra.It's mainly because of delhi centric bias in our country
Will you making a video on Biblical Christianity?
Basically Buddhism is Hinduism without the Vedas. I chant Hindu and Buddhist mantras often. They both help me a lot! Namaste 🙏
Buddhism abandon Hinduism beliefs and teachings. Only Buddha's teachings were taught and practice.
Hey man love your videos, wondering if you could do a video detailing what a U.S. civil war would be like.
Yeah that would be a great video
💐THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God saves man from the destruction of this old world"
(This may be a reminder for most people of God's words from Genesis: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness." Suppose God is saying that "let us" make man in "our " picture, then "ours" shows two or more; since He said "ours," then God is not only one. In this way, man begins to think generally of different persons, and from these words came the idea of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. At the time Moses wrote Genesis, it was after the creation of mankind following the creation of the world. In the beginning, when the world, Moses did not exist yet. And it was a long time before Moses wrote the Bible, so how could he possibly know what God said in heaven? He was unaware of how God created the world. What is written in the Old Testament is the work of Jehovah, a phase of the work of God Himself for ushering in the Age of Law. This is the work of God, where as He spoke, it happened, and as He commanded, it remained. When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. When man speaks of separate persons, does it not reflect God? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Doesn't the Spirit of God simply carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives?" Because of this, there is no distinction between persons.)
Almighty God said
This can be a REMINDER for most PEOPLE of GOD'S WORDS from GENESIS: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." Suppose GOD says "we" will CREATE MAN in "our" IMAGE, then "we" SHOWS TWO or MORE; since He SAID "we," then GOD is NOT one. IN THIS WAY, MAN BEGAN TO THINK GENERALLY OF DIFFERENT PERSONS, AND FROM THESE WORDS HAD THE IDEA OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. What then does the Father look like? What does the Son look like? And what does the Holy Spirit look like? ☀️🙏
Could it be that the present man was made in the image of the one who was put together from the three? Then is the image of man like that of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? 🙏
WHICH of the persons of GOD is the image of MAN? This idea of MAN is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and NONSENSE! It can only separate one God from several Gods. 🙏
AT THE TIME Moses WROTE GENESIS, it was AFTER MANKIND WAS CREATED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE WORLD. In the BEGINNING, when the WORLD began, Moses did NOT exist. And IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR MOSES TO WRITE THE BIBLE, so HOW could he possibly KNOW WHAT GOD SAID in HEAVEN?🙏☀️
He is UNCONSCIOUS of HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLD. 🙏
In the OLD TESTAMENT of the Bible, there is NO mention of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, only the TRUE GOD, JEHOVAH, is PERFORMING His WORK in ISRAEL. ☀️
He is CALLED by different NAMES in the CHANGING TIMES, but this DOESN'T PROVE that each NAME REFERES to a different PERSON. Therefore, then wouldn't there be countless persons of God? What is WRITTEN in the OLD TESTAMENT is the WORK of JEHOVAH, A PHASE of the WORK of GOD HIMSELF for the START of the Age of Law. This is GOD'S WORK, where ACCORDING to what He SPOKE, it happened, and ACCORDING to what He commanded, it REMAINS. 🙏💐
AT NO TIME DID JEHOVAH SAY HE WAS THE FATHER WHO WOULD COME TO EFFECT THE WORK, or did He even foretell the coming of the Son to redeem mankind. WHEN IT CAME TO THE TIME OF JESUS, it was only mentioned that GOD became MAN to REDEEM ALL MANKIND, NOT that the SON CAME. ☀️
Because the times are not the same and the work that God Himself carries out is also different, He has to carry out His work within different kingdoms. In this way, the identity He represents is also different. PEOPLE BELIEVE JEHOVAH IS THE FATHER OF JESUS, but JESUS DOESN'T REALLY ACKNOWLEDGE, saying: "We were never identified as Father and Son; I and the Father in heaven are one. The Father is in Me and I am in the Father; when men see the Son, they see the Father in heaven." ☀️😪
When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. By the time man attempts to explain, matters are complicated by the idea of different persons, as well as the relationship between Father, Son, and Spirit. WHEN MAN TALKS ABOUT separate persons, does it not reflect GOD? 🙏🔅
Man even ranks persons as first, second, and third; these are all mere human understandings, unworthy of reference, and utterly unreal! If you ask him: "How many are there in God?" He will say that God is the Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: the one true God. If you ask him: "Who is the Father?" He will say: The Father is the Spirit of God in heaven; He rules over all, and He is the Lord of heaven." "Then is Jehovah the Spirit?" ☀️
He will say: "Yes!" If you ask him afterwards, "Who is the Son?" He will say that Jesus is the Son, anyway: "Then what is the story of Jesus? From whom did He come?" He will say: "Jesus was born of Mary through the shadowing of the Holy Spirit. " ☀️
"Then is not His substance also Spirit? Does His work also represent the Holy Spirit?
Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Now in the last days, it goes without saying that the Spirit still works; how did He become different persons? Doesn't the Spirit of God just carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives? Because of this, there is no difference between personas. 🙏
From "Is There a Trinity?"
Fulfilled in "In the beginning He was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). ... and "When I looked up, someone handed me a book wrapped in a scroll. I opened it and I read on both sides the prayers, lamentations, and curses." (Ezekiel 2:9-10). ... "His garment was stained with blood. He was called the "Word of God" (Rev. 19:13).
The kingdom He brought down and set up in the highest in the sky so that it can occupy His creation in the universe and engrave on it the entirety of His Holy name "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD" 💐 fulfillment of (Mat. 16:18) "And I say as for you, you are Peter, on top of this rock I will build my Church, that even the power of death will not prevail over it.". ... and "The Letter to the Church in Philadelphia" (Rev. 3:7-13). ... And fulfillment of "The New Jerusalem" 💫 "The Spirit enveloped me, and the angel led me to the top of a very high mountain. He showed Me Jerusalem, the Holy City, coming down from heaven from God." (Rev. 3:7-13). ... " For the time has come in the house of God for the beginning of judgment in the house of God." (1 Peter 4:17). ... It is fulfilled that God Himself is our Pastor in (Rev. 7:17) 💐
"For the Lamb in the midst of the throne will be their PASTOR. He will lead them to springs of life-giving water; and God will wipe away the tears from their eyes"
📩 Calling and leading the sheep of God to His glorious Throne "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD"💐 to submit again to His authority so that He will continue to teach, guide and protect even in plague, famine and wild animals will not be moved by it and completely win this final battle with the big red dragon!
"They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and it will be fulfilled that will be established above the sky/RUclips in (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . . . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace."✉️ 💌
nice drawing;)
🖌
Thank you so much 😀
@@vasudevanbalasubramanian8572 that’s not grounds for reporting a video. This is an illustrated video and I do my best to make it accurate but of course it’s not perfect. Go ahead and report it, but it won’t do anything in a petty situation as this. If you continue to harass me and my channel, I will report you however. Your choice.
Prince Siddhartha known as Buddha was an Emperor's Son and was well versed in Vedas.
He was A Hindu Yogi and difference was he broke Social Laws of Hinduism where Life is divided in 4 Varnas and 4 Ashrams
4 Varnas are Classes not Castes
(Caste is a Portuguese word Casta)
1.Brahmins = Intellectual class
2.Kshatriya=Administrative class
3.Vaishya =Entrepreneur class
4.Sudras=Working service class
5.Dal (out class) =Underworld and Mafia. Mainly under target by Gvt.
4 Ashrams in Hinduism
1.Brahmacharya=Student life
2.Grihasta=Married life
3.Vanprasta =Retired life
4.Sanyas=Retire from all social obligations and work to seek God.
The Whole Globe follows this above system whether in America or Pakistan or China, above 4 Varnas and 4 Ashrams are followed world wide.
Buddha introduced Young unmarried boys of as low as 15 years and 25 Years into Sanyas Ashram.
This destroyed social fabric and caused a Silent, Peaceful Genocide of a entire Race of Educated and Administrative elite leaving reproduction to lowest classes like tribals in forests and the Underworld gangsters or Spoilt brats from elite classes.
The Masses of Class people just disappeared as All became monks.
In Hinduism this Monk business is allowed only after you have passed the Responsibility of life including procreation of next generation and getting your children married.
All So Called Buddhist actually follow Hindu social order only as strict adherence to Buddha means, No babies and only Run after Nirvana.
Life is not misery but a training.
Example :- In Hinduism Pain in Gym =Tapasya to gain HE Body
In Buddhism, They want to escape the pain yet want the HE body.
Hence in Practice, Hinduism gained.
Buddha in Hinduism is a Divine soul and his philosophy inspires us, but ultimately it's the Gita that drives our lives.
Escape from pain into Nirvana is basis of Buddhism
Pain in life is a part of soul purification and is necessary, as Gold Rod is heated and melted to become ornaments.
Escape Pain =Buddhism
Experience Pain on path to perfection =Hinduism
The Das
These religions actually make you think and get your brain going instead of just following a premade plan.
❤ thanks
Lotd buddha is great❤
The rigid caste system in Hinduism has deeply influenced Indian society for centuries, leading to significant economic consequences. By restricting social mobility and limiting opportunities based on birth rather than merit, the system has hindered workforce efficiency and innovation. Many lower-caste individuals face discrimination, lack access to quality education, and struggle to find well-paying jobs, resulting in widespread poverty and underutilization of human capital. This social divide not only exacerbates inequality but also slows down India's overall economic growth, preventing the country from fully realizing its potential in a rapidly evolving global economy.😢
hindu is a folk tale like most other religions
buddhism is a way of life,
have you ever read any vedic scripture? if not, then you should not speak what it is or not. And the video above clearly shows how they both have their similarity and differences. you should be more open minded and question even the teachings of buddha and explore other beliefs.
@lestagez Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try. 🤣🤣
Acknowledgement of well validated Hindu/Vedic metaphysics by eminent quantum/astrophysicists
ERWIN SCHRODINGER (ONE OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS) Schrodinger's biographer Moore wrote -- “His system - or that of the Hindu Upanishads/Vedas - is delightful and consistent: the self and the world are one and they are all. He rejected traditional western religious beliefs (Jewish, Christian, and Islamic) not on the basis of any reasoned argument, nor even with an expression of emotional antipathy, for he loved to use religious expressions and metaphors, but simply by saying that they are naïve--and will NOT understand Quantum physics and consciousness. (CONSCIOUS, IMMANENT AND OMNIPRESENT SELF = SHIVA and THOUGHTS/BODY/W0RLD/UNIVERSE = SHAKTHI OR INTELLIGENT ENERGY)
Erwin Schrodinger wrote: “Vedanta teaches that consciousness is singular, all happenings are played out in one universal consciousness and there is no multiplicity of selves.”
Albert Einstein ``Whenever I read Bhagavad Gita, everything else seems superfluous. I've made Vedas as the guide for the formation of my theories and scientific investigation"
Werner Heisenberg _ (One of the pioneers in the field of quantum mechanics) - "Quantum ideas which seemed so crazy made sense only after reading hindu/vedic metaphysics"
Carl Sagan (Astrophysicist) “The Hindu/Vedic tradition is the world’s greatest tradition dedicated to the idea that the cosmos itself undergoes an immense number of deaths and rebirths. It is the only tradition in which the time scales correspond no doubt to those of modern scientific cosmology. The cycles run from our ordinary day and night to a day and night of Brahma - 8.64 billion years long. It is longer than the age of the Earth, the Sun, and half the time since the Big Bang.”
It also means, "Big Bang" does not mean "one time" 'creation" of the universe (out of thin air) around 4004 BCE at 8.30 am in the morning by some transcendent god with a magic wand. 😀😀
@@dakshrao2001 "Buddhism different from Hindu" nope. In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different "codes of conduct" 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm)
Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try.
No religion is perfect in its understanding of the divine. There are flaws in all of them. That's why a spiritual journey should be taken alone. Find your own truth, not the truth of someone else.
Buddha did not reject the possibility of one all-powerful god, he just explained it is something not worth considering.
Isn't eliminating "desire" still a desire? :-) Catch-22 ---- desire: to be healthy, beneficial to others for instance?
I hope they become the 1st largest religions in the world.
There is no "versus". Buddhism is just another sect of Sanatan Dharma which the west calls "Hindusism" (Hindu is a geographic label meaning of the Indus area). Other sects are Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktism, Sikhism, Jainism etc much like Lutheran, Baptist, Calvinist, Orthodox Greek, Orthodox Russian are called "Christianity". The faiths evolving in the Indian Subcontinent are all based on Karma, Dharma and Moksha along with yoga and meditation which no other faith in the world shares. Sanatan Dharma means Eternal Law.
Buddhism is vast as hinduism. There are lots of schools in buddhism like in christianity.
In Dhammapada verse 279, the Buddha clearly said "sabbe dhamma anatta" which means all dhamma lacks an unchanging self atta/atman". You still wanna claim Buddha is a branch of vedic religions? The Buddha himself had a lot of arguments and debates with Brahmanists because his teachings were opposite to the Vedas.
@@minthura9053obviously gautham wanted to make a new religion how can he keep everything same as Hinduism?? So thats one of the differentiating point between both religions!! He took points form Hinduism and modified it according to his own thoughts and created Buddhism!! Even Sikhism is similar to Hinduism but they also added thier own 1:08 twist like Buddhism, if Buddhism is exactly same a Hinduism why did it get new name ?? Common sense there should be some differentiating factors to make it mew religion!
@@minthura9053 it's not a branch of Hinduism, it's basically a part of indic philosophies
@@dhirajreddy56 Sikhism is basically a carbon copy of hinduism, there is nothing original about sikhism whereas Buddhism, Jainism have something to stand upon.
Buddhism, like all knowledge, is actually a branch of the Vedas (what u incorrectly call "Hinduism" n incorrectly claim teaches a birth based caste system when it never mentioned that system except when it correctly predicted society would fall into it). Thus, other than Buddhism not mentioning a creator or permanence, all Buddhist teachings I ever read, are the same as the Vedic.
Buddha did talk about Demigods of the Vedas (AKA Angels), heaven, n hell. However, in 5th Veda it correctly predicted God would incarnate to help animals and, "...appear as Lord Buddha, the son of Añjanā, in the province of Gayā, just for the purpose of deluding those who are envious of the faithful theist."
4,000 years? The Vedas were composed OVER 5,000 years ago, but were taught through word of mouth BEFORE that, for countless millennia (to societies that were more advanced than us). Vedas have a history of 4.3 billion Earth years, which they teach is 1 day on a top planet in the universe. Check out those roughly 10,000 year old cities found miles from India in the Ocean (reported by sources like the BBC).
Over 5,000 years ago there was a great war involving the powerful rulers of Earth, with the victor becoming basically the Emperor of Earth. The Vedas were the source of the people’s spirituality/schools, politics, farming etc. All math, major sciences, the oldest, most accurate history, predictions that have come true (like of God’s great flood) or are coming or will come true etc. were originally stated in the Vedas. People who followed the Vedas were called Arya (sometimes with "n" at the end) which means noble in the sense of following the Vedas. The "Arya Invasion theory" is faulty speculation.
The Vedas warned that the % of people who follow the Vedas, truth, goodness, marriage vows, compassion for animals, etc. decline starting 5,000 years ago, with explanations on why it’d happened (but with a rare golden age that can happen possibly within our lifetime). The Earth's exact measurement as a globe, its 7 continents, Jesus Christ etc. were 1st mentioned in Vedas (e.g. 5th Veda: specifically, the Puranas). Distant planets, Relativity, & the most detailed, accurate, advanced models of creation, evolution, all originated from Vedas.
Click the sub, bell icons on youtuber "Playitalready" for upcoming vids with more detail, sources, evidence, insight, n fun. For now, watch his old, ok vids.
Good knowledge. I agree with most of it and definitely appreciate your effort to write it and also thanks.
@@Quasarrr I appreciate your thanks. I'll try to be open minded to any disagreements u post here or on Playitalready's upcoming, insightful vids. the Buddha did say follow things based on reason n i gotta agree with that.🙏
Modern Hinduism is a later development. Mahabarat, Bhagawath Githa, Valmiki's Ramayana are not older than Buddhissm. Brahamanism developed modern Hinduism to challenge Buddhism and survive. Brahamin Chanakaya's captured Magadha kindom, and Killed Buddhist kings, and they tried to change the history.
@@smlanka4u I'm confused why u ignored everything i said, including facts i touched upon, like how i cited a city mentioned in the Vedas that even the BBC said was recently found n dated as over 10,000 years old, n how i quoted 5th Veda (which Gita n Mahabharata are part of) that correctly predicted Buddha, n how i offer more evidence, etc. n instead,
u just make up stuff which, even if some of it is true, u offer 0 proof for?
did u read my 1st comment? what if everything in it is true?
@@smlanka4u hehe so you say the Vedas were written by magadha kings and all the polytheistic culture n puraanas of different dieties were written by magadha kings. Even the temples were constructed by magadha kings? Looks someone read alot of Ambedkar twisted history. 🤣🤣🤣
Buddhism is older than "Hinduism" which was a creation of the British. Buddha was also from Nepal, native Nepalese looked "Mongoloid" not Indian. One of the reasons why Buddhism prospered in East and Southeast Asia is due to the similarity of phenotypes between the original Nepalese and other Asiatic peoples.
The oldest archaeological evidence through carbon dating proves Indus valley as the oldest evidence for a civilization which is much more older than when Gautam Buddha was born. There is minimum gap of 1000+ years with Buddhism being newer. Buddhism itself states that it rejects vedas. Which means vedas are older. That is enough proof to suggest that Hinduism which follows vedas is older than Buddhism.
Bro buddhism is older than hinduism read pali and buddhism by bryan levman and he was shudra and at the border of aryan and non aryan culture.
@@OSY_PB_ATHEIST_PALKU Siddharth Gautama, the founder of Buddhism was born after the vedas were already into existence. Buddhism rejects vedas that one doesn't need to perform rituals to attain Moksh. Read in more details about why Buddhism came into existence and when vedas came into existence.
@@mohitpatel9974
Do not argue with me argue with the author that I mentioned. And about vedas there were no archaelogical evidence of it such as manuscripts etc prior to common era. And since buddhism rejected ritualism obviously it rejetcted and will reject all the rituals whether in the past or the future.
@@OSY_PB_ATHEIST_PALKU thank you for proving the point that that Buddhism rejected ritualism. Which is the exact point you need to understand. The ritual that are followed in Hinduism which is actually based on Sanatana Dharma is older than Buddhism. What archeological evidence do you want when you have already accepted that Buddhism rejects ritualism and the Hindus follow the same ritualism, which were being performed before Buddhism was born
I am also like Buddhism ❤
Indeed, thank you! So the interesting thing is that Both the Buddha and Christianity evolved in the subcontinent from Sanatan Hinduism. the core belief of Sanatan Hinduism is that once you separate yourself from Maya, then you can attain to the universal consciousness. Congratulations, majority of the world is now Sanatan. But like any mother the parent belief system has to remain silent or phrase all the children.. otherwise fighting breaks out.
☸
🙏
😇
well i heard buddhism is copied form jainism
what is this a gay curriculum on how to be blue vs red types gay?
Actually Hinduism is Christianity, Islam, Bhuddism, Atheism, any belief you have is a hindu belief, Hinduism is the philosophy of life as we know it. Hinduism as you all agree has evolved and is evolving and will always keep on evolving as we learn more about our universe itself. Every animal, plant or anything is a Hindu. So to say hinduism is seperate from Bhuddism is crazy, because I am a Hindu who is a little bit Bhuddist, a little bit Christian, a little bit Muslim and a little bit Atheist.... So don't try to defy Hinduism, you can't defy reality itself LOL
Even budha is 9th avatara of Vishnu in dhashaavathara
😂😂😂😂
Buddha: Pagal Hai Kya? 🤣🤣
That's different buddha. Not Gautam buddha
Actually, Gautam Buddha was not the first Buddha born. There were 27 buddhas before him, in different time periods. There names and time periods can be found in the buddhist religious texts. So Buddhism is lot more ancient than many people realize. The next Buddha is Maitreya buddha.
Nope. Showing tertiary evidence like books doesn't cut it since it can be cooked up by anyone including colonialists. Moreover, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Jain, Buddhist and Sikh) are NOT based on history anyways.
They are based on Vedic metaphysics. In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different codes of conduct 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm)
Regardless of how many "Buddhas" were there, the original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try.
A deity is a god or goddess
you forgot to mention Buddhism also promulgated in Indian subcontinent before it went east
Can you do feudalism vs capitalism
Feudalism is a great idea!
@@IllustratetoEducatedepends on how you say that...
We hindus not only proud our religion hindu means india.. And we proud buddisum strted in india🇮🇳👌
In Hinduism they worship statue and they believe taking bath in River clear there sins in Buddhism we don’t worship statue or we wash our sins by river .
The core of Hinduism says - no sins can be washed away. The effects can be diluted but for that one has to perform penance by performing good karmas. Those who think that their sins are washed away are just fooling themselves. One can only wash their sins by penance (accepting punishment) or asking for forgiveness from the one they have wronged.
+ The point of statue is not to worship but to provide an image when one performs mantras or meditation. A mind without a focal point has a very high chance of getting distracted, these idols exist to provide an image for not having that distraction. Most rishis/sages of the Vedic era didn't sit in front of any idol but in front of fire. So this is false info.
@KingBadsha-n6y "worship statue" Buddhists have stone deities of Buddha too in their monastery. Point is in all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh and Jain) there is no concept of god or heaven or hell. So, they revere or venerate stone deities (not worship as god) which symbolically represent Vedic metaphysics, nature, laws of nature including dharma. Hindu temples are also powerful energy centers to reach samadhi by transcending 5 senses and ahamkara (loosely translated as ego in English)
Moreover, Buddhism is NOT older than Hindu.
Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try.
Point is Buddhism (like Jain and Sikh dharmic traditions) is not different from Hindu tradition at the metaphysical level. In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different codes of conduct 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm)
But of course, different codes of conduct are followed by them which give them their "identity" misunderstood as different metaphysics.. So, Buddhism is impractical for many due to stricter codes of conduct just like Jain and Sikh traditions. it is the reason why even people who were born in such families don't abide by their strict requirements. But Hindu tradition has more clarity when it comes to different yoga pathways which lead to the same outcome. eg Karma yoga (lead a worldly life but at the same not violate dharma or not create karma/cause and effect) and Sanyasa yoga (complete renunciation)
@@mohitpatel9974 "no sins can be washed away" yes because karma or cause and effect is not the same as "sin" of Abrahamic religions 🤣🤣
1, Karma can be created by any memory or attachment to any action (good and bad) which can lead to reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of immortal and omnipresent self or athma). So, karma is not the same as sin.
2. Hindu tradition has more temples and yoga/meditation techniques (which Buddhists copied including Vipassana from Patanjali's Yoga sutra ) than any other dharmic tradition (including Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) for removing karmic imprints.
It also means, stone deities in Hindu temples are not “gods' ' because there is no concept of god or heaven or hell in Hindu tradition. Stone deities are used for 2 reasons.
a. They are used as objects of attraction (so given bath, food and decorated with makeup, dress, jewels etc) for focus and meditation (to have vibrational experience) in the presence of Sanskrit mantra vibrations, augmented by temple architecture, sanctum Sanctorum (space where deities are kept) and shape/ posture of deities.
Bowing, prostrating and circumambulation (go around deities 7 times in a clockwise direction) simply speed up and expand the vibrational experience. Obviously, some Hindu temples are more powerful energy centers than others e.g. 12 Jyotirlinga temples present in different corners of India. As soon as one enters them, powerful vibrations can be experienced immediately.
This technique is for reaching the samadhi state which is nothing but the disappearance of perception of the observer (conscious, immortal and omnipresent athma) and observed (external world or the deity focused on) “duality” momentarily (temple tradition) or temporarily and permanently (in Yoga tradition)."Pranaprathista" "pooja" or ritual should be interpreted as a tool to reach vibrational experience which can eventually lead to the disappearance of the observer/observed split when 5 senses and ahamkara (sense of I) are transcended.
Samadhi experience is for "self realization" that you (immortal, conscious and immanent athma) are (already) that (immortal, conscious, omnipresent and transcendent Brahman) - the impassive experiencer but not the doer. Thoughts/ body/world/universe do everything but not experience anything. To understand this key difference is one of the purposes of hindu temples (powerful energy centers) and yoga/meditation.
Another purpose is to remove un-manifested seeds of memories (which can lead to karma or cause and effect and reincarnation if unremoved) stored in one of the subtle bodies called Chitta, from millions of past lives so that reincarnation (transmigration of subtle body with memories to another gross body ) can be put an end and moksha (microcosm to macrocosm) can be attained.
2. Stone deities are also symbolic representations of the well validated Vedic metaphysics, nature and laws of nature which maintain the stability and harmony of the universe.
a. Some of the rituals are also symbolic like offering flowers (to give up attachment to any desires), bananas (to give up attachment to fruits of achievements) and breaking coconuts (to give up attachment to ego). As far as "ritual powder" or Vibuthi (ash) applied between the 2 physical eyes is concerned, it is nothing but a symbolic reminder that this body is temporary and will be eventually cremated or just to show symbolically (Vibuthi) that intelligent energy manifests as matter in the conscious field of the immortal self (so called opening of the third eye or cosmic eye symbolically shown between the 2 physical eyes)
b. In the same way, the tradition also gives importance to the concept of dharma or natural law when it comes to both animate and inanimate which contribute to stability and harmony of the universe..(it is not just about humanity). It is the reason why cows/snakes/monkeys/plants/trees are revered for doing their dharmic duty. Always remember, except human species (which violate dharma or the natural law due to ego and free will) non human species (animate and inanimate) are pre-programmed to follow the natural law or dharma to sustain stability and harmony of the universe..
But religion applies only to humans. There is no religion of electrons, monkeys, plants and galaxies, whereas all of them have their dharma even if they carry it out without intention.
In dharmic traditions, the word a-dharma applies to humans who fail to perform righteously; it does not mean refusal to embrace a given set of propositions as a belief system or disobedience to a set of commandments or canons because there is no concept of god in Hindu dharmic tradition
The fact that prayers for healing was banned in Assam india around when this came out is telling non indians that prayers are not for Hinduism.
What's the difference between the word prayer in other relgions and in Hinduism?
Ragas arent prayers?
"Prayers" are just for veneration and to calm one's mind not for worshiping some stone deity as god because there is no concept of god or heaven or hell in dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh).
@@indianmilitary most ancient religions knew words matter so I looked at prayers as words spoken intended to heal rather than harm.
Speaking life over you.
I understand Hinduism has various ways and that some worship god as formless rather than an idol.
@@indianmilitary most ancient religions knew words matter so I looked at prayers as words spoken intended to heal rather than harm.
Speaking life over you.
I understand Hinduism has various ways and that some worship god as formless rather than an idol.
Most of the Hindus says Buddhism is part of Sanatan Dharma and related to Hinduism or Sanatan Dharm....... Buddhism is one of the part of Sanatan Dharma that's truth But Buddhism is totally different from Hinduism✅🤍🤍 some Brahman or Brahmins who can't answered the True meaning of Dhamma to Siddhartha So He just plan to search it and gain it..........
Once Buddha said IT'S WE WHO PUT OURSELVES IN TROUBLES AND MAKE OURSELVES SUFFER ,NO ONE CAN FREE YOU FROM SUFFERING AND PAINS IT'S YOU WHO ARE THE RESPONSIBILE ......and it's the difference between Others religions and Buddhism........ Buddhism don't depends on others and Others religions do✅😊🤍🤍🤍no hatreds
"Buddhism different from Hindu" nope. In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different codes of conduct 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm)
Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try.
Hinduism is based on caste system, whereas, Buddhism oppose caste system and therefore even Dr Br AMBEDKAR who is father of Indian Constitution and one of the greatest social reformer which India has produced left hinduism and embraced Buddhism.
Infact hindus r responsible to end buddhism in India. Pushmitra sung in 185 bce killed last buddhist emperor.
Shashanka burned baudhi tree at Baudh gaya. He even destroyed buddhas footprints which were located at varanasi. Read Vincent Smiths book "Early history of India".
Hinduism doesn't have a caste system it's verna which was created by corrupt pandits who wanted wealth from rulers in order to keep the rulers bloodline ongoing and ruling nation. Bhagvate gita holiest hindu book find a word which says caste or anything related to caste I am ready to convert to Buddhism.
2 . Dr br ambedkar never converted to Buddhism in his own words he said both Buddhism and hindus are part of the same tree. 3. after the death of gautam buddam india started becoming Buddhism and then Acharya ramanuja who went all over india having debate about it and always proved it hinduism is greater in every single way. There was no killing of Buddhism in India It like killing their own people
The last Buddhist emperor was against vedas and was the weakest king in the Asoka dynasty who was against protection of dharma ☸️. He was killed by his army commander who was a Kshatriya.
Let me ask you something about how Buddhism ended in the majority nation of afghanistan, Bangladesh, indonesia , Philippines and malaysia surprisingly these all nations are islamic now why? Buddhism in Afghanistan was 100% population once upon a time and today afghanistan is not even 0.001 percentage Buddhism how and why
One has Gods, a number of them. The other renounces anything as being of godly in nature.
nice vid
Good effort but hindus recognise most of the things you mentioned exclusively for Buddhists here, most so called differences actually don't practically hold up. I'd go so far as to say they both are too similar to call them seperate religion, it's just that Buddhism was a missionary theology and it spread more. However i think if i have pick differences, hindus recognise suffering to be integral part of life but believe life is more than that, there's beauty in world and it's worth the suffering. Hindus also much like Buddhists value renunciation, not just of desires but also of fate to dharma. It's about doing the right thing and leaving the fruits of your actions to Brahman. In this renunciation, man finds true peace and salvation. Hindus come at this from various approaches and have path laid out in theology. They all converge into truth, that's why hindus don't have much problem with Buddhists as they see Buddhists as just one more approach to realising this truth
Hinduism is hardly 200 years , when britishers came india there was no hinduism here. Now they claim 10000years old which is a fake.
bro graduated from tiktok
1949
bro high on sewer water
Title itself is very wrong there is no Hinduism vs Buddhism... coz this are core religions of India... We respect both 🙌 unrespectful is the conversion this Abrahmic religions do to there followers with there unethical ways..
Dharmic Religions ❤☸️🕉️
There is also concept of Hell (Nark) and Heaven (Swarg) in Hinduism...
Nope , swarg just simply means where gods live and narak means where the devil lives , normal people don't go there , the soul is reincarnated untill it gets moksha and then stops existing in these merely human forms and become one with this infinite universe
@@futureminds9742until the reincarnation happens souls parks at 7 astral layers according to Karmas
@@futureminds9742not devil's sinners undergoing punishment.
@@futureminds9742 bro according to vaishnava sect there are 14 worlds, 7heaven and 7 hells and svarga log is one of the heaven.
In puranas not upanisads
Hell is considered as a state of mind.@@bharatyaswaraj5641
Läsa och kolla men tror inte när de är elaka
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
yes this was wow
Buddhism is not at all part of hinduism the later is very recent. Those who really wants to know about buddhism should read ambedkar writings and western scholars like bryan levman book pali and buddhism.
And asc e tic fi g ures be for e and ea rly bu d i sm by de guyter
@OSY_PB_ATHEIST_PALKU "Buddhism not part of Hindusim" Then you neither understood Buddhism nor Hindu tradition. 🤣🤣
In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different codes of conduct 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm)
Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try.
How can Hinduism be polytheistic and monotheistic?
Hinduism believes in one god (monotheism) and the other deities are manifestation of the one god (polytheism)
2:52 that's why ambedkar converted Buddhists
"Ambedkar converted" Did he shave his head and became a buddhist monk? 🤣🤣
I'm also Indian but i believes hindu god not exist.the real god is Buddhist. N hindu copd the Buddhism
😂ok ppl can believe wrongly
Actually you are right, we are being taught wrongly in history. History books are based on brahmanism and colonialism, we need to check historial evidence.
So sigma Indian bro
I don't understand Buddist. Some of them say they are atheist but believe in rebirth. Like who do you think controls and manage your soul after death?. Without god how can you reincarnate?
sorry but I'm not going talk anything for u as buddhist but I have questions who's control the Solar system, day and night or waves at the sea 🤔 I'm not Expert in buddhism because I'm only following buddhism only for way of life but I can tell u this if u sad, feeling aloneness, happy, anything like thag desire U can live this place because u souls have attachment to this world U may die and Reborn in another world or heaven or hell but not able to stop that only your attachment is over then U can live this place as normal person I'm not doing that because I have attachment so i use buddhist teaching as way of live but if i consider i want nirvana then I can start that with stopping my attachment to saddest happiness like emotional and becoming a monk it was different base one one's self
These 2 originated in south asia.
Official languages:
Hinduism - Hindi
Buddhism - Nepali
Buddhism language is - Pali
Hinduism language is-sanskrit
I can write in the sand with a stick but the waves wash away my sand scripture
@@sumitraj5280 Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try.
Buddha against Brahminism dominance Caste system
Hindu religion is defamed due to Brahminical caste system because caste system is a gift of Pandits
Nice but Hinduism has not caste system
Personally, I side with the Hindus, primarily over the lack of recognition of an ultimate "God/Source/Oneness" by the Buddhist. Nor do I believe the journey of the soul is based on repetitious suffering that repeats with each incarnation and can never be stopped. Once you are enlightened enough to rise above suffering, why does the Soul need to come back to relearn the same lesson over and over?
Of course this video oversimplifies hinduism and Buddhism to stay short and so it doesn't explain everything in detail and leads to some misunderstanding
But what Buddhism is teaching is that everything is impermanent and everything exists in interdependence with the rest (a tree for example doesn't exist by itself, it needs soil, sun, water etc... Same logic applies to us and our "self") so there is a sense of Oneness in Buddhism, we just say this oneness is empty of definitive or unchanging nature. that's why we don't believe in a soul as a form of permanent self going from life to another, we talk about an impermanent phenomenon going through death and rebirth over and over because of karma (actions that produce causality), and this Samsara is filled with suffering, not by essence but because of our own approach of it, because we keep trying to possess, reject, or ignore things that are impermanent and inevitably get out of our reach, the suffering comes from this clinging to impermanent phenomenon.
So Buddhism doesn't say that a soul comes back to relearn over and over the same lesson, I don't understand how you reach that conclusion.
Lord Buddha taught about the cycle of suffering but more importantly he taught about how to break free from it, this is the four Noble Truths: the suffering, the origin of suffering, the cessation of suffering, and the path towards that cessation
@@epoflacko108 I got that from the video, but to be honest, I really don't care enough to watch it again to tell you where in the video. But I certainly wouldn't have come up with it on my own. Best wishes!
Once you are enlightened enough to rise above suffering, why does the Soul need to come back to relearn the same lesson over and over? Because there is a ladder created by karma you can get to the top tier thanks by karma but the karma will be burned and you will fall to the lower tiers again. In buddhism top tier is occupied by gods and titans but they must abide karma and they will burn out the karma and go back to the lower realms look for term Bhavacakra on wiki. Everything has explanation in the karma wheel breaking system.
@@jozefbania I really appreciate the response!!! I read threw it quickly.but I'm walking out the door. When I get back later I'll read it again more carefully. But before I left, I just wanted to thank you for responding!!
You're using the wrong map of India
The parable of those who reject Faith* is as if one were to shout like a goat- herd, to things that listen to nothing but calls and cries: deaf, dumb, and blind, they are void of wisdom.
Holy Quran, chapter 2, Al Baqarah (The Heifer) verse 171.
* Islam
Allah Subhana Wata'ala; Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
I think the borders of the Indian subcontinent stop at Pakistan because Afghanistan is more Central Asia.
Hindism is part of mahayani buddhist
All hindu god also mahayani buddhist god
But many indian brahamis people claim
Hindusm is older then buddhism
But this is totally wrong
You cannot fond any evidence of hindism
before buddha
even before samrath asok
I want to challenge all people
Give me proof
before buddha any archeaology evidence of hindusm. .
Buddha himself is the biggest proof go ahead
There was no Hindu in India during Buddha time.
Evidence: not a single mention of Hindu word in Asoka inscriptions all over India.
Put Buddha was a khattiya (not Kshatriya) why? Because according to digha nikaya khattiya means lord of the fields (Jo kheto ka Malik ho) and not some Varna identity shit of kshtriya in Brahmanism (Hinduism).
During Buddha time no Varna system existed.
@@Manoj-vp5in then how buddha get opportunity to reject Vedas and theist ideas ? Lol
Hinduism is older than buddhism. Use Google
Rigveda Samhita was itself 1500 and 1200 BC older. Even more than buddhism. If it is so then how buddha get opportunity to reject Vedas????
Suppose Vedas is essential material of Hinduism ...
Hinduism name is new.. but considering buddhism is older than hinduism then it's totally invalid...
Buddha born into kshatriya family in shakya clan....
He dad was prince itself. Many gurus come and meet him so how you can say hinduism didn't existed before buddha....
And yeah. Buddhism reformed as a non-theistic way to attain nirvana by meditation....
If hinduism really didn't existed on that time so how he learn this concept???
@@Manoj-vp5in caste system is approach by the later Vedic period corrupt Brahmins 🤦 get knowledge first... You must be Neo-buddhist or with no knowledge
Cleopatra hid her son Alexander Helios there and called him the son of god and that she was isis I think he became shiva
Buddhism is not a religion
Buddhism is a free thinker
Buddha dont ask you to worship him
Buddha is not a creator 100% true fact
Buddha dont mix with Hinduism at all cost
Buddha against Brahminism dominance I like it
BRAHMA VS BODEAN
Life is impermanent. To think things will stay the same just attachment. Buddhism is more focus on working on that self.
Hi what is hinduism and budismis is this CHRISTIAN?
Modern Hinduism is not older than Buddhism, and it was developed later to help survive Brahamanism and challenge Buddhism.
True! This video unreliable
bro graduated from taco bell toilet
You are a fool. Buddhism came from Hinduism! Siddartha who you call Buddha was a Hindu, all his teachings are from the teachings of Hinduism, the word Buddha itself is a SANSKRIT word which is the ancient language of India, so how can you ever say Buddhism came before Hinduism, you are evil! Stop spreading propaganda!
In your nightmares
Buddhism mirrored Sanatan Dharma
Both are based, and so is this video.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
So they’re like complete opposites of each other.
Absolutely not. Original Buddha (1900 BCE) was a Hindu. He followed Vedas (he did not deny Athma) , was a vegetarian and spoke Sanskrit. But the fake Buddha (550 BCE) who spoke fake pali and ate beef was created by colonialists out of thin air. The whole Nirvana Buddhist cult right now is based on a fake Buddha created to pit Buddhism against hindu/vedic tradition. They also created King Ashoka out of thin air to show that he converted from "bad hinduism to good buddhism". Nice try.
Point is Buddhism (like Jain and Sikh dharmic traditions) is not different from Hindu tradition at the metaphysical level. In fact, all 4 dharmic traditions (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh) understand and accept 4 core laws of nature based on well validated Vedic metaphysics despite different codes of conduct 1. Dharma (natural law) or that which sustains stability and harmony of the universe and how one should abide by it by following ethics, duty etc) 2. Law of karma or cause and effect (created by memories due to attachments and violation of dharma 3. Reincarnation (subtle to gross body transmigration mediated by the conscious field of the immortal and omnipresent self or athma) 4. Moksha (merger of subtle and gross body with the macrocosm)
But of course, different codes of conduct are followed by them which give them their "identity" misunderstood as different metaphysics.. So, Buddhism is impractical for many due to stricter codes of conduct just like Jain and Sikh traditions. it is the reason why even people who were born in such families don't abide by their strict requirements. But Hindu tradition has more clarity when it comes to different yoga pathways which lead to the same outcome. eg Karma yoga (lead a worldly life but at the same not violate dharma or not create karma/cause and effect) and Sanyasa yoga (complete renunciation)
Buddhism came from Hinduism as Gautama was a Brahman. He reached enlightenment through Hindu meditation etc. and taught what worked for him to reach moksha. He never set out to create a new religion. Also this video acts like liberation and moksha are separate things which is obviously not correct. If Buddha came up in the Catholic Church he would be a Saint, but still a Christian. Instead he was a Hindu who became a saint but a whole religion was made. Buddhahood is Shivahood and vice versa there is no difference. The real buddist were the Mahasiddhas and Tantrics who share the same Tantric philosophy as their Hindu Tantric counterparts. Om ah hum vajra guru padma siddhe hum, Om Shiva Gorak Aadesh🙏🏼🔱
Buddha: Abe pagal Hai Kya?? Kabhi tipitaka padhe Hai?? 🤣🤣
It's not 4000old, it is way older ..
Earlier they both was not a religion
So they both believe we technically live in a matrix....
Voilent Caste system,racism,superstitions,sati system,dowey system,hate against women are the components of Hinduism
Soooo, just basic humanity then?
@@GD-tn3ezHinduism has female goddesses who are revered so there is respect for woman. Sati is not mentioned in scriptures. If you saw oct 7th of what Hamas did, that is what happened in Mughal invasion and thus sati as a practice was born before that it didn't exist. Sati is another name of Shiva's wife the trinity of Hinduism. So sati is a name of goddess, before invasion it was a name only and not a practice. Caste system doesn't exist, Varna system is totally different. Varna वर्ण means character/sound equivalent is what you call alphabet.
Varnamaala वर्णमाला - character chain
Varnaviched वर्णविच्छेद - character spelling (like breaking a word and spelling each individual letter)
Varnasamyog वर्णसंयोग - character combination
Varna is a root word thus it retains its meaning in other words without its meaning being changed so caste is a false translation.
It is laughable to think that racism is components of Hinduism when most of Hindus are brown, and also some of the goddesses are dark coloured like Maa Kaali (adishakti avatar)
Components of Hinduism are 4 Purusarthas, 7 Main chakras, 3 Gunas, 4 yogas (paths to salvation) don't spread your thoughts based on half knowledge.
သာဓု သာဓု သာဓု