PCG: No Filipino fishermen arrested in West PH Sea amid China's anti-trespassing rule | ANC

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 дек 2024

Комментарии •

  • @Monkey341
    @Monkey341 4 часа назад +1

    One cannot named part of the South China Sea as West Philippines Sea and claimed it's theirs. For centuries, it is the South China Sea, and only in 2011, the Philippines named that part of the sea, the West Philippines Sea.

  • @johntwohy8337
    @johntwohy8337 2 дня назад +1

    If the fishing boats do not enter the territorial waters, the CCG has no reason to arrest them.

  • @desmondpun1773
    @desmondpun1773 3 дня назад +2

    The Philippines backed its historical claims from the 17th-century map, where the Scarborough Shoal First Appeared on Maps of Philippine waters in the 1750s. On the night of Sept. 12, 1748, the British East India Co. ship Scarborough struck the now-famous reef of the same name while on its way from England to China.
    As a result, the name Scarborough Shoal first appeared on maps of Philippine waters by English cartographers in the 1750s, according to research by a member of the Philippine Map Collectors Society. It also appears in the Murillo Velarde map in his 1749 book under the name Panacot or Scarborough Shoal, both terms refer to Bajo de Masinloc.
    Going Back to the 17Th century, the Hydrographical and Chorographical Chart of the Philippine Islands was one of the First versions of the Philippines map. This magnificent map of the Philippine archipelago, drawn by the Jesuit Father Pedro Murillo Velarde and published in Manila in 1734, is the first and most important scientific map of the Philippines.
    The Philippines was at that time a vital part of the Spanish Empire, and the map shows the maritime routes with captions from Manila to Spain, and to Mexico known as New Spain, and other Spanish territories in the New World.
    Currently, the Philippines based its claims on the legal Victory on the 12th of July 2016, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The Arbitral Tribunal in the South China Sea Arbitration between the Republic of the Philippines versus The People’s Republic of China, which issued a unanimous award in the disputed waters in the South China Sea, was largely favorable to the Philippines, which was rejected by China.
    Reference: “How the Philippines "DEBUNKED" China's Historical Claims in the West Philippine Sea”

    • @legpol
      @legpol 3 дня назад +1

      Filipino friends, term of the game should change to the High Seas. We must sue China for violating the UNCLOS Article 89 which says : "No State may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its sovereignty."

  • @cabatuorsuville118
    @cabatuorsuville118 3 дня назад +1

    Truly - WPS is with in the maritime jurisdiction of the Philippines under International Law.
    China radio challenge and aggressive behavior in the SCS - is it right or just simply diversionary to
    the Philippines Drug war investigation by the ICC
    PBBM - mabuhay

  • @juncruz1545
    @juncruz1545 3 дня назад +1

    isadsad mga lumang barko natin dyan para bantayan ng mga fully combat marines with shaldag patrol vessel mabuhay

  • @RosalieQuinto-zj7di
    @RosalieQuinto-zj7di 3 дня назад +2

    Mahina ang PCG,Kya mahal ang presyo ng mga isda KC ND na kakapalaoot sa bajo masincoc natatakit sila ..escort dpt mga fishermen ntin.

  • @legpol
    @legpol 3 дня назад +1

    菲律賓,你們還有理由上法庭告中國違犯聯合國海洋法公約89條。
    Filipino friends, term of the game should change to the High Seas. Do not hold the territorial sea and the EEZ too long. We must sue China for violating the UNCLOS Article 89 which says : "No State may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its sovereignty."
    You should take the lead to demand the International community to fulfill its responsibility for the High Seas. Doing so, you will not fight alone. Many countries will be your allies. Instead of going to an arbitration, you will be suing China as a plaintiff.

    • @Monkey341
      @Monkey341 4 часа назад +1

      Who the eff is UNCLOS? It is an organisation under the thumb of the US. So why should China accept its decisions?

  • @DaniloManuntag-ex9pw
    @DaniloManuntag-ex9pw 4 дня назад +1

    The Philippines-US defense pact is appropriate. Philippines US and like minded allies should jointly patrol the WPS to uphold the rule of law and freedom of navigation.
    Facing China's illegal claim of the South China sea, PH EEZ Scarborough , Ayungin, Escoda shoals and Philippine territories in the Kalayaan Islands,
    China's threat to occupy Taiwan by military force,
    China's growing nuclear arsenal, an expanding large navy, a multitude of militia vessels, ballistic missiles, hypersonic missiles, and
    of China's building of artificial islands military bases on Fiery Cross reef, Subi reef, and Mischief reef,
    The US should deploy more TYPHON MISSILE SYSTEMS, SAM-6, Tomahawk, Dark Eagle, and Patriot missiles to deter China's aggression.
    The Philippines should procure Typhon missile systems too to boost its defense capability. The PH-US build/develop air bases, naval bases and seaports to accommodate more new ships, and fighter aircrafts.

  • @Lordismyshepered
    @Lordismyshepered 4 дня назад +2

    Wt...? It's our own territorial ezz zone.

    • @legpol
      @legpol 3 дня назад +2

      Filipino friends, term of the game should change to the High Seas. We must sue China for violating the UNCLOS Article 89 which says : "No State may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its sovereignty."

  • @Kuyakoymoves
    @Kuyakoymoves 3 дня назад +1

    Wala Naman kayong magawa para palayasin sila

    • @legpol
      @legpol 3 дня назад +1

      菲律賓人應該喚醒國際,中國在霸佔公海。中國要的,不單是旁人的領海,而是霸佔公海。這卻違犯國際法89條: "No State may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its sovereignty." 故,你們應該上法庭告中國。

  • @Kuyakoymoves
    @Kuyakoymoves 3 дня назад +2

    Puro kayo presscon nakakaumay

  • @johnny-ih5es
    @johnny-ih5es 4 дня назад

    China submitted a statement regarding the baselines of the Scarborough Shoal to the U.N. Did the Philippines do it?

    • @bitcoinmonitor7144
      @bitcoinmonitor7144 3 дня назад

      it will not affect the first binding lol

    • @johnny-ih5es
      @johnny-ih5es 3 дня назад

      @@bitcoinmonitor7144 Boats entering the waters adjacent to Scarborough Shoal can be asked to leave.

    • @legpol
      @legpol 3 дня назад

      @@johnny-ih5es :Filipino friends, term of the game should change to the High Seas. We must sue China for violating the UNCLOS Article 89 which says : "No State may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its sovereignty."

  • @itch4travel
    @itch4travel 2 дня назад

    "CHINA'S SOUTH CHINA SEA HISTORIC RIGHTS."
    PTP... CTTO... ruclips.net/video/8wGkXI5HHTA/видео.html

  • @itch4travel
    @itch4travel 2 дня назад

    "SOUTH CHINA SEA 101",
    PTP... CTTO... ruclips.net/video/pBSRKUfYf40/видео.html