I need more information but with what we know, I don't really like clicking a button to change your culture. I like the idea of evolving to a new culture but that should be gradual. Like, if you adopt a Celtic pagan religion, you should be able to build stone circles and recruit warband-style infantry units. I think that would be a much more interesting way to go about culture. Love your content! Keep it up
Yes, I'm not particuarly drawn to changing cultures like this but in the future I could see this coming to total war, and it would be a wild feature basically. Ruffling the feathers. It does need to be gradual, and you should be able to keep those units as you said. Thank you again for the support! These videos aren't easy to make!
Ancien age and crisis colonization age and de colonization crisis and modern age. All civs need to have ancient exploration and modern version. I believe than age 7 will be great if take some stuff from civ4. I will play civ7 no matter what. I did all civ from 1 to 6 and now a can't wayte for civ7
I remember how shocked I was in 2004 when I first time played civ 4 and saw... americans. Seriously, that 3 ages idea is great. Brazil or US made of brazilian jews coming north is just nonsense once you don't have Portugal in a game at all, at launch at least.
I really want to try Ara, it looks so much more promising than Civ 7 at this stage at least. The hype is even bigger than with Pharaoh's map update which was really good one. Hexes of different shapes (which is really showing they KNOW what they are doing, those standart ones look awful), armies, crafting, future age, own powerful engine, it has more to offer than civ 7 and at the same time much more reasonably priced. Civ 7 is overpriced as Pharaoh was. They basically just fix their own mistakes from civ 6 like poor unit movement, too cartoony graphics (it is still too much that way though), boring city-states, dead rivers (when CK 2 actually had them long before civ 6 lmao, just study the market, "AAA developers''). I am glad they finally got themselves a nice competitor from the same city. We need another one but for CA now. It will be painful of course but everyone need that treatment, they both function in market economies after all, not planned ones, or do they prefer communism? Humankind just has worst interface possible. All amplitude studios games are like that. They need to fire those guys making or at least tell them to stop. Just take whatever you like from civ, TW, Anno, anything but not this crappy transparent all grey thing. It seems like they are less developed than phoenicians were and many others like ancient egyptians, and do not know how to make different colours. This alone could at least triple the sales. Changing civs is not of a big deal, but yes 6 transitions is a bit too much, and district system is kinda boring after some time. They made a great battle system but interface and overall art is so horrible it spoils everything. It is like you piss in a barrel, it will spoil the drink eventually I guess.
I need more information but with what we know, I don't really like clicking a button to change your culture. I like the idea of evolving to a new culture but that should be gradual. Like, if you adopt a Celtic pagan religion, you should be able to build stone circles and recruit warband-style infantry units. I think that would be a much more interesting way to go about culture. Love your content! Keep it up
Yes, I'm not particuarly drawn to changing cultures like this but in the future I could see this coming to total war, and it would be a wild feature basically. Ruffling the feathers. It does need to be gradual, and you should be able to keep those units as you said.
Thank you again for the support! These videos aren't easy to make!
Ancien age and crisis colonization age and de colonization crisis and modern age. All civs need to have ancient exploration and modern version. I believe than age 7 will be great if take some stuff from civ4. I will play civ7 no matter what. I did all civ from 1 to 6 and now a can't wayte for civ7
I remember how shocked I was in 2004 when I first time played civ 4 and saw... americans. Seriously, that 3 ages idea is great. Brazil or US made of brazilian jews coming north is just nonsense once you don't have Portugal in a game at all, at launch at least.
I really want to try Ara, it looks so much more promising than Civ 7 at this stage at least. The hype is even bigger than with Pharaoh's map update which was really good one. Hexes of different shapes (which is really showing they KNOW what they are doing, those standart ones look awful), armies, crafting, future age, own powerful engine, it has more to offer than civ 7 and at the same time much more reasonably priced. Civ 7 is overpriced as Pharaoh was. They basically just fix their own mistakes from civ 6 like poor unit movement, too cartoony graphics (it is still too much that way though), boring city-states, dead rivers (when CK 2 actually had them long before civ 6 lmao, just study the market, "AAA developers''). I am glad they finally got themselves a nice competitor from the same city. We need another one but for CA now. It will be painful of course but everyone need that treatment, they both function in market economies after all, not planned ones, or do they prefer communism? Humankind just has worst interface possible. All amplitude studios games are like that. They need to fire those guys making or at least tell them to stop. Just take whatever you like from civ, TW, Anno, anything but not this crappy transparent all grey thing. It seems like they are less developed than phoenicians were and many others like ancient egyptians, and do not know how to make different colours. This alone could at least triple the sales. Changing civs is not of a big deal, but yes 6 transitions is a bit too much, and district system is kinda boring after some time. They made a great battle system but interface and overall art is so horrible it spoils everything. It is like you piss in a barrel, it will spoil the drink eventually I guess.