He deserves honour for he has bought physics in India in the most Indic and respectable way possible. He is the one who is the mastermind behind all the curious minds watching this video. He should be credited for awakening the sleeping physics classes
@@johnrithwik4293 yes sir..... I teach Physics in school and to some college students outside school and H.C Verma, Rechard fynnman, Walter lewin .... They are the north stars of my life.
I don't think to be a good teacher u need to learn from good teachers.... It depends on the person how she/he acquires knowledge and pass them to the required ones.....there are many great personalities who didn't even have a teacher
Well well what I am talking here bro is completely based on my experience and yes exceptions always exist. But I am sure you will be agreeing with me that if someone found a teacher very motivating and very charming while teaching when he or she will become a teacher it's very likely that the person will be influenced by that teacher. Learning does not stop when you left the school or the college, your learning continues (even after you become a teacher) from many sources even from the students you communicate and obviously when there are great videos like this available on the internet that definitely helps you to become a good teacher.
H. C. Verma is a great man. India, and the rest of the world should be grateful for this icon, who shares his amazing knowledge with the world for free.
MIT , YALE UNIVERSITY and many more prestigious universities in world are streaming whole lectures for free even one channel NPTEL started by IIT's covers many lectures for various streams and most famous are lecture series by V.Balakrishnan one of best physicists present in India.
I am done with my college,have a job,have no exam in physics to clear in nearby future ,but still I am watching it because it is interesting. Thank you a lot sir.
Wow, such a level of knowledge , maturity and sharp skill to explain a tough concept through simple words and a smile on a face so that each and every student can understand it is commendable. Thank you so much sir for your kindness. Dhan Dhan janani teri re
Sir you know the heart of many crucial and difficult concepts.. I have not found any teacher explaining these confusing concepts with this much of clarity and easiness.. Please sir make more videos on advanced level physics
Sir I really want a teacher like you, I am really impressed to your style of teaching and I also have a target to crack iit - jee. And even I ready to take online classes from you... And if you want to teach me sir then I come to your home too for got some knowledge from you ....
Even after the measurement, the uncertainty is there, it's more fundamental than you explained here!. it's not a suspicion or our inability to predict the outcome (that's there, though), but it's more fundamental.
Sir what's does it actually means as it holds uncertainty principle or not. According to my calculations i found that ∆x.∆p is less than h/4π .. Sir please clarify my doubts.
Best video sir keep uploading. I was having doubt in Gaussian Wave function. You teched in your online course that's how you done the mathematical calculation of expectation value of x squared, how you done integration.... Please response...
Hello Sir , I have 2 questions please answer when you get time 1 - If an electron has some wave function and after measurement it's wave function changes then doesn't that mean that electron is no more an electron but some other kind of particle , because it's wave function is different And if it's still an electron even the wave function is different then why is it so , I mean which characteristics of wave function tells that it is an electron and not some other particle 2 - Can you tell the functional form of an electron wave function for 2 cases : 1. Electron is at rest(zero velocity) 2. Electron is moving with constant velocity of say 100 m/s Ok Thank You
there are instrinsic properties associated with a particles like charge, mass etc... Wave function only measures some characterists of the physical state of a system. It is not like we were uncertain about the charge of an electron. So no. Collapsing quantum state doesn't make a new particle.
When transition element showing screening effect and the cause of screening effect is the lower shielding power and we know (s) spherical shape have a large shielding effect and (f) complex shape . I want to know about after screening effect and left over orbitals what work of s p and d .I want to separate video at that topic . THANKS
@cITRIC ACId hey son here's your daddy talking from 2069 you are infact born in 2069 but the world in 2069 is so bad that i sent you to the late 1990s to have a better life. it's time to thank your daddy my son
Even though we've have proven the fundamental relation between wave and particles , it's quite bizzare to hear Particle with certain wave function ..... isn't it professor
One question arise in my mind now Sir Doubt is:- Suppose there are 2 experimentalists. One performs a measurement on the system and then leaves it as it is. Then comes the second one and he is again performing the same experiment on the system left by the previous experimentalist. Then what will be the state of the system for the second one before performing the experiment . Will it be the original state or the state as left by the first one.(The first one did not tell anything about his result of the experiment.)since he does not know about the measurement already performed so it should be in the original state(but then it shows as if consciousness plays some role) Please please please clear my this doubt Sir please.
Bro the thing is they possess two natures like light one is particle nature and another is wave nature this nature depends on flow of energy to the accelerating electeon when due to maxwell law it release both magnetic and electric field which leads to the development of electro magnetic radiation release
Sir ..if two microscopic body are connected toh each other(say with spring) .....than if we know the velocity of one particle accurately and position of other accurately with velocity of 1st one we can get velocity of 2nd one whose position is accurately known to us......thus it is against uncertainty principle.......what is wrong in this.... actually I saw it somewhere which created doubt.....pls help
Dear Hc Verma sir I have to clarify a question whether my approach is good or not. Question is why Electron does not exist in nucleus? I told two reasons to my student first one on the basis of Radioactivity that Electron will react to proton and neutron will be produced and that will destroy stability. Second reason on the basis of by using fact that Electron particle will produce de brogile wavelength due to wave and range of that wavelength is not order of 10 power - 15. Am I correct sir?
Myself Pratyay from kolkata, thank you sir so much for your references and questions included in the H.C.Verma book.For you only my physics base increased so rapidly that iam hoping for fullmarks in physics this time in my school exam!
suppose two particles are mathematically connected , we connect both of them on opposite side of a spring we compress both the sides and we let them leave (in space) bcoz they are mathematically connected by knowing the position of one we can know velocity of the other and then we can find both the velocity and position of the particle , heisenbergs uncertainity principle disproved .....
Sir I am class 12th student I want to know that does magnetic potential exist like electric potential and if not exist then why ? I want to separate video about this information.
Hello sir, I always read everywhere that the uncertainty principle is intrinsic to quantum mechanics, but I don't find this fact digestible... I have a book on quantum mechanics that explains how we take the measurement of position of an electron. It explains as follows : To measure the position of an electron we take a hypothetical gamma-ray microscope of width 2a and some other dimension specifications for the mathematics that I rather not mention to keep the question short. The microscope has a gamma ray gun that will shoot gamma rays. Now, when a packet hits the electron under observation, it reflects back to the lens but it also imparts some extra momentum dp to the electron and will also change the position of the electron by some value (say dx). Then using some optics relations it derived the uncertainty principle. What I find bugging me here is that it is the electron that caused the uncertainty in position and momentum. So, how is this intrinsic to quantum mechanics and not the problem with the method of measurement we use. I also heard this in a "nptelhrd" lecture that the problem is not with the measurement method we use. Can you please help me clear this misconception (if it is one)?
Its because electron is very tiny particle that it changes its poisition and momentum by just impact of gamma radiation. We want such radiation which will hit electron without changing its position and momentum, which is not practically possible upto now.
@@aakashp2123 That is what I am asking! Isn't this the machine's incapability that it can't measure position and momentum when the gamma radiation hit electron! Besides please do not mention electron as a particle or wave... It just behaves like them, it is a matter-wave!
Watch video oh Heisenberg uncertainty principle on Lighthouse channel on RUclips. The definition in ncert about this topic is absolute garbage and wrong.
That explanation that you wrote is wrong definition of of this principle. Many books explain this in a very wrong manner. You can watch the video I recommended before, or watch another video on this topic on World Science Festival RUclips channel.
He deserves honour for he has bought physics in India in the most Indic and respectable way possible. He is the one who is the mastermind behind all the curious minds watching this video. He should be credited for awakening the sleeping physics classes
Brought
Rightly said " Awakening the sleeping physics classes"
Really, you guys do have the best teachers
Actually that was done by S.N. Bose
@@milesbeckett1558 true.. What about you bro...
"Say my name"
"h c verma"
"You're goddamn right"
Breaking Bad huh
copied from ted ed
The "H" in "H.C Verma" stands for Heisenberg
To be a good teacher ...you need to learn from good teachers....u r one of those good teachers for me ,🙏 Sir.
So you're already a teacher?
@@johnrithwik4293 yes sir..... I teach Physics in school and to some college students outside school and H.C Verma, Rechard fynnman, Walter lewin .... They are the north stars of my life.
I don't think to be a good teacher u need to learn from good teachers.... It depends on the person how she/he acquires knowledge and pass them to the required ones.....there are many great personalities who didn't even have a teacher
Well well what I am talking here bro is completely based on my experience and yes exceptions always exist. But I am sure you will be agreeing with me that if someone found a teacher very motivating and very charming while teaching when he or she will become a teacher it's very likely that the person will be influenced by that teacher.
Learning does not stop when you left the school or the college, your learning continues (even after you become a teacher) from many sources even from the students you communicate and obviously when there are great videos like this available on the internet that definitely helps you to become a good teacher.
@@pralaybose9998 ,.
He is the only teacher who can explain the most complicated concept in the most easiest way that no one else can do......
H. C. Verma is a great man. India, and the rest of the world should be grateful for this icon, who shares his amazing knowledge with the world for free.
MIT , YALE UNIVERSITY and many more prestigious universities in world are streaming whole lectures for free even one channel NPTEL started by IIT's covers many lectures for various streams and most famous are lecture series by V.Balakrishnan one of best physicists present in India.
Alakh Pandey is also there
Ronak Khurana totally agree with you , he is God !
I love the sound of chalk on the board. Indeed, I love your teaching.
After years I am hearing this sound
@@ROHIT-jt8lz same here
I have passed mechanical.... But still watching this video.... Because this right here is the man who made me love physics ♥♥
The Irony....... He looks like Walter White and explains 'the Heisenberg' Uncertainty principle
But his indian and not suffering from lung cancer😅
@@baradbrijesh8618 Also He is not cooking meth somewhere out there
For a second I thought that you are speaking about the poet"walt whitman". Blue baby.
good one
He doesn't look like Walter White
I am done with my college,have a job,have no exam in physics to clear in nearby future ,but still I am watching it because it is interesting. Thank you a lot sir.
ruclips.net/video/x4Z4CfA59mE/видео.html
Cop to Heisenberg: You will be penalised for overspreading!
Heisenberg to the cop: where am I ?
Cop: "somewhere here" 😎😅
Nice one 🤣😂
Thanos : iam inevitable.
Iron man : I am iron man
Heisenberg : I am uncertain.
Pauli:I am exculsion😅
@@strikersoccer9535 oh boy🤣🤣
@@shatakshisharma5240 🤣🤣🤣😏
Schrodinger : I am dead yet writing this comment. 😂
Real Heisenberg : say my name
Legend of the indian physics!
Felling grateful to get a chance to get knowledge from u sir
ruclips.net/video/x4Z4CfA59mE/видео.html
Dear sir, the smile on the face really helps us to join the joy you feel
I'm a commerce student and I got recommendation of this video.
I have no idea about these, but only came to see this legend teach❤️
And what you get in this video is certainly nothing. But still appriciate your curiosity 💛
I am still uncertain about the uncertainity principle
That's why it's uncertainty principle
@@sagarkalwale2052 😂😂 haha
Same here
🤣🤣🤣
Ek ritu aaye ek ritu jaye your name is not certain therefore you are still uncertain .
I just love your books sir ,u are truly respectworty !😊
Wow, such a level of knowledge , maturity and sharp skill to explain a tough concept through simple words and a smile on a face so that each and every student can understand it is commendable. Thank you so much sir for your kindness.
Dhan Dhan janani teri re
I'm a Mathematics Student, but I can't skip this video just because of ur wonderful explanation method
महान गुरु H C VERMA को सादर चरण स्पर्श।BY SHIV SIR BIOLOGY.
God please give me simplicity like this man🙏🙏
Walter Levin is also a beast
Well that was quite a nice lecture. Loved it !! I had been searching for something like this.
7:05 Thumbnail
HC verma sir brand of physics. Love you sir
Best teacher and best understanding way in my life
Heisenberg?
YOU'RE GODDAMN RIGHT
Walter, be yourself please.....
I am the one who knocks .
I am the danger.
AHAHAHA BRUH G1
“Say my name.”
His lecture helped me a lot to get a good, nice, soud sleep. Thanks a lot sir.
Sir can you make videos for neet ug preparations, as many poor students can't afford to attend tuition classes in India??
I am in class eleventh and my any doubt related to that topic is cleared now.
Thanks❤❤ sir
ruclips.net/video/x4Z4CfA59mE/видео.html
Great teacher ..of physics .
Sir you make physics simple.
Love and respect from Pakistan.
No i tried but couldnt find
Sir you know the heart of many crucial and difficult concepts.. I have not found any teacher explaining these confusing concepts with this much of clarity and easiness.. Please sir make more videos on advanced level physics
That's the only topic which i can't forget.
Sir I really want a teacher like you, I am really impressed to your style of teaching and I also have a target to crack iit - jee. And even I ready to take online classes from you... And if you want to teach me sir then I come to your home too for got some knowledge from you ....
Professor Saheb ko bahut bahut badhai Congratulations!
Concept of Physics -ke author.
Sir I am your biggest fan...🙏🙏
the charm of fundamental analysis ..with amazing synchronicity
Gajab ki energy(effect) hai sir apke ander
Say my name.
Heisenberg.
U r god damn right.
Even after the measurement, the uncertainty is there, it's more fundamental than you explained here!. it's not a suspicion or our inability to predict the outcome (that's there, though), but it's more fundamental.
I really want him to be my physics sir so I can discuss about such topics with him which are really interesting.
I become more uncertain after watching
Sir what's does it actually means as it holds uncertainty principle or not.
According to my calculations i found that ∆x.∆p is less than h/4π ..
Sir please clarify my doubts.
I want grandfather like HC Verma Sir 😊😊😊 best guru of physics.
Ah yes the sound of chalk hitting the blackboard. There is something fun in this as compared to screen projecters and digital boards
Best video sir keep uploading.
I was having doubt in Gaussian Wave function. You teched in your online course that's how you done the mathematical calculation of expectation value of x squared, how you done integration.... Please response...
well done sir,keep it up..pls upload more and more it helps us..
Congrats on the padmashri sir you truely deserve it
His ever lasting smile shows how much he has achieved in life
I am really proud of Prof Vermaji.He is a great Teacher.
No words for your teaching ... U r awesome sir.. 🙏
Thank you ,sir!!😀🙏
Learn grammar dumbass
@@vaishaligoel2321 ifkr
@@vaishaligoel2321 U could have just pointed it out, don't need to shame people for their inadequacies.
He deserve for top award for physics
best description of heisenberg principle ever seen on youtube
Hello Sir ,
I have 2 questions please answer when you get time
1 - If an electron has some wave function and after measurement it's wave function changes then doesn't that mean that electron is no more an electron but some other kind of particle , because it's wave function is different
And if it's still an electron even the wave function is different then why is it so , I mean which characteristics of wave function tells that it is an electron and not some other particle
2 - Can you tell the functional form of an electron wave function for 2 cases :
1. Electron is at rest(zero velocity)
2. Electron is moving with constant velocity of say 100 m/s
Ok
Thank You
there are instrinsic properties associated with a particles like charge, mass etc...
Wave function only measures some characterists of the physical state of a system. It is not like we were uncertain about the charge of an electron.
So no. Collapsing quantum state doesn't make a new particle.
HC verma and alakh pandey best physics teacher of RUclips
Feeling proud to Hindustan bcz we have world no. 1 physics teacher
Hahahah nice joke
Sir, honestly you can change the average student to topper 👍
To obtain h-bar, that is, Planck’s Constant in angular units, why was division done using 4-pi instead of 2-pi?
Bcs ∆x.∆p≥h/4π
beacause the and subtended by the wave is of 4 pi instead of half of 3pi😅😂
Neil's Bohr Statement :- If anyone says he understand Uncertainty either he is lying or he is fool.
Haha
2007-2008......HC verma part 1 part 2 Refrence book was essential for us
♥️♥️♥️ Very nicely explained by sir!
Who can dislike these types of videos?. Awesome sir
i m mbbs md but still here just because of him ,i love physics
Master of art सबके बस का बात नहीं होगा
Mind-blowing explanation sir.... just love your smile
Excitement can seen on his face always 😍 great person
H C Verma - Kingpin of India
the king is back
When transition element showing screening effect and the cause of screening effect is the lower shielding power and we know (s) spherical shape have a large shielding effect and (f) complex shape . I want to know about after screening effect and left over orbitals what work of s p and d .I want to separate video at that topic .
THANKS
Thank you very much sir for your books and very grateful of explanation.You are a god for us
Please, make a video on quantum physics on Time travel..
he did it already in 2029
@cITRIC ACId hey son here's your daddy talking from 2069 you are infact born in 2069 but the world in 2069 is so bad that i sent you to the late 1990s to have a better life. it's time to thank your daddy my son
@@adthya2098 here is your grandfather, my grandson how are you today? 😀
Time travel concepts come in relativity.
There is no time travel as of now.
I would like to thanks u for sharing such useful knowledge to us🙏
You're Goddamn Right!!
Sir...
Underrated comment......
Hello sir......
Your way of explaining is awesome. Sir I have one doubt.....
What is tha momentum of universe whether it is constant or changing...
Sir g... Plzzzz discuss Uncertainty principle in energy and time
Sir our physics teacher has told us to solve your physics book for proper practice of questions 😣 very hard
do it with love for physics.TRUST ME YOU WILL HAVE LOVE IT SO MUCH.Sir H C VERMA is a gem..
Sir, u r the living legend
JESSE!!! WE NEED TO COOK JESSE!
Even though we've have proven the fundamental relation between wave and particles , it's quite bizzare to hear Particle with certain wave function ..... isn't it professor
5:33 the wave drawing was awesome like your lecture
I have finished my masters but clicked to listen him teach Physics xD
Thank u sir, your explanation is very well and heart ❤️ touching
Thank you sir!! Also.... Understood friction by reading ur book only!! 🙂🙂☺
Sarvesh Deshpande hey bro! where did you get his book?
HC verma
concepts of physics
vplume 1 &2
@@jalilkhan6251 u can get it on Amazon or Flipcart too
Sarvesh Deshpande thanks bro
@@jalilkhan6251wc man!
Alternatively Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal is all about wavy behavioral of matter & not just uncertainty/unpredictability.
Just watch this in very simple way
ruclips.net/video/x4Z4CfA59mE/видео.html
Dual Behaviour of matter
A particle has certain wave function position uncertainty is 10 ^-18 m . Then the momentum is measured which turns out be 10 ^-17 m/s.
One question arise in my mind now Sir
Doubt is:- Suppose there are 2 experimentalists. One performs a measurement on the system and then leaves it as it is. Then comes the second one and he is again performing the same experiment on the system left by the previous experimentalist. Then what will be the state of the system for the second one before performing the experiment . Will it be the original state or the state as left by the first one.(The first one did not tell anything about his result of the experiment.)since he does not know about the measurement already performed so it should be in the original state(but then it shows as if consciousness plays some role) Please please please clear my this doubt Sir please.
it will be the state left by the first one
One of the best explanations!
It went over my head
Aeonian H That’s why it is uncertain.
Ofc. Weebs are losers
ruclips.net/video/x4Z4CfA59mE/видео.html
Check on this
Very excellent style of teaching
If electrons are not particles, if its wave, then how can electricity flow through the wires??
Bro the thing is they possess two natures like light one is particle nature and another is wave nature this nature depends on flow of energy to the accelerating electeon when due to maxwell law it release both magnetic and electric field which leads to the development of electro magnetic radiation release
So smart his forehead shines like a gem
Sir ..if two microscopic body are connected toh each other(say with spring) .....than if we know the velocity of one particle accurately and position of other accurately with velocity of 1st one we can get velocity of 2nd one whose position is accurately known to us......thus it is against uncertainty principle.......what is wrong in this.... actually I saw it somewhere which created doubt.....pls help
Dear Hc Verma sir I have to clarify a question whether my approach is good or not. Question is why Electron does not exist in nucleus?
I told two reasons to my student first one on the basis of Radioactivity that Electron will react to proton and neutron will be produced and that will destroy stability. Second reason on the basis of by using fact that Electron particle will produce de brogile wavelength due to wave and range of that wavelength is not order of 10 power - 15.
Am I correct sir?
Yes you are correct
But this can be explained by many other methods also
@@aryamanarora6588 tell me more procedure.
Thank you sir for clarification it's another issue of simultaneous measurements
mesmerizing...sir ...
Myself Pratyay from kolkata, thank you sir so much for your references and questions included in the H.C.Verma book.For you only my physics base increased so rapidly that iam hoping for fullmarks in physics this time in my school exam!
suppose two particles are mathematically connected , we connect both of them on opposite side of a spring we compress both the sides and we let them leave (in space) bcoz they are mathematically connected by knowing the position of one we can know velocity of the other and then we can find both the velocity and position of the particle , heisenbergs uncertainity principle disproved .....
well well, stop stealing ideas bro, ITS WHAT ALBERT EINSTEIN THOUGHT.. but i am not degrading H C Verma sir.
HE'S IS THE BEST TEACHER I HAVE EVER SEEN
@@whiterabbit3359 yes ik its from einstein but i just found it so amazing , so i thought i could get an answer from another legend in physics
Sir, try hagomoro chalk. You will thank me later.
check the chalk he is using ;)
UNAFFORDABLE
@@rahilsahim1218 he'd be better off using whiteboard and marker
@@adthya2098 what about the ASMR from chalk and whiteboard
Sir I am class 12th student I want to know that does magnetic potential exist like electric potential and if not exist then why ? I want to separate video about this information.
Magnetic potential is differ to electric potential and change in magnetic potential that's called induced emf and we can say like a induced current.
magnetic vector potential exists but magnetic scaler potential Does not exists as magnetic monopole does not exists
Physicswallah students...
Attendence here..
Hello sir, I always read everywhere that the uncertainty principle is intrinsic to quantum mechanics, but I don't find this fact digestible... I have a book on quantum mechanics that explains how we take the measurement of position of an electron. It explains as follows : To measure the position of an electron we take a hypothetical gamma-ray microscope of width 2a and some other dimension specifications for the mathematics that I rather not mention to keep the question short. The microscope has a gamma ray gun that will shoot gamma rays. Now, when a packet hits the electron under observation, it reflects back to the lens but it also imparts some extra momentum dp to the electron and will also change the position of the electron by some value (say dx). Then using some optics relations it derived the uncertainty principle. What I find bugging me here is that it is the electron that caused the uncertainty in position and momentum. So, how is this intrinsic to quantum mechanics and not the problem with the method of measurement we use. I also heard this in a "nptelhrd" lecture that the problem is not with the measurement method we use. Can you please help me clear this misconception (if it is one)?
Its because electron is very tiny particle that it changes its poisition and momentum by just impact of gamma radiation. We want such radiation which will hit electron without changing its position and momentum, which is not practically possible upto now.
@@aakashp2123 That is what I am asking! Isn't this the machine's incapability that it can't measure position and momentum when the gamma radiation hit electron! Besides please do not mention electron as a particle or wave... It just behaves like them, it is a matter-wave!
did u watch the video properly? watch again after 6:33
Watch video oh Heisenberg uncertainty principle on Lighthouse channel on RUclips. The definition in ncert about this topic is absolute garbage and wrong.
That explanation that you wrote is wrong definition of of this principle. Many books explain this in a very wrong manner.
You can watch the video I recommended before, or watch another video on this topic on World Science Festival RUclips channel.