I was reading cisco ENCOR book and this video helped me so much to understand this that you have no idea! Sadly i had already spent hours before seeing this but i guess it happens for a reason
Can we use SR-IOV for a VM so that the traffic does not go through the VSwitch? The VM in question has lots of RTP traffic and the VSwitch does not keepup with the high frequency of pakcets. Therefore, I am looking at SR-IOV so that we can pass traffic directly and bypassing the VSwitch.
VLAN tagging is supported with SR-IOV since vSphere 5.5. For more information about the enhancements in the vSphere SR-IOV support, please refer to the vSphere 5.5 documentation. pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-55/topic/com.vmware.vsphere.networking.doc/GUID-5383DF43-A474-4E44-8024-A0A2E4B4A3AB.html
I was reading cisco ENCOR book and this video helped me so much to understand this that you have no idea! Sadly i had already spent hours before seeing this but i guess it happens for a reason
Can we use SR-IOV for a VM so that the traffic does not go through the VSwitch? The VM in question has lots of RTP traffic and the VSwitch does not keepup with the high frequency of pakcets. Therefore, I am looking at SR-IOV so that we can pass traffic directly and bypassing the VSwitch.
can we bond the physical functions and enable lacp
I heard that latest vSphere doesnt support SRIOV along with VLAN tagging , is that still valid ?
VLAN tagging is supported with SR-IOV since vSphere 5.5. For more information about the enhancements in the vSphere SR-IOV support, please refer to the vSphere 5.5 documentation.
pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-55/topic/com.vmware.vsphere.networking.doc/GUID-5383DF43-A474-4E44-8024-A0A2E4B4A3AB.html
Informative, but the volume change between your intro/outro music and the speaker is huge - not amused.