@@suryasurya-hm9pz ABSOLUTE MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY: Time DILATION proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. Einstein's equations are NECESSARILY QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. In fact, the mathematical unification of Maxwell's equations AND Einstein's equations (given the addition of a fourth spatial dimension) proves that ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE; AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma; AS time DILATION proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is expanding OR contracting in and with time. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This is, in fact, CLEARLY proven by BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED IN AND OUT of SPACE AND TIME, as this is CLEARLY proven by time DILATION, F=ma, AND E=mc2. This ALSO explains the cosmological redshift AND the "black hole(s)". Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) ACCORDINGLY, FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE, MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AND A POINT are all then in BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. GREAT !!! This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, and describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Therefore, I have demonstrated the true mathematical UNIFICATION of physics/physical experience AS what is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. By Frank DiMeglio
Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. ------------------------ String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. The model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .
For those interested, the reason why we use colors for quarks is to explain parallel inverted spectrum's. An inverted spectrum means the presence of one equates to the absence of the other. The presence of a positive red quark means necessarily the absence of a negative red quark, but not necessarily the absence of a blue quark positive or negative. Love the video, thank you so much for the educational content!
Hello, I am university student from Czech Republic and I would like to thank you for you sharing that amazing knowledge of yours with everyone. I consider you to be THE ETALON at teaching - explaining and transfering the knowledge. Maybe one day you will write your own book about nuclear chemistry/science topic. I wish you luck, health and personal happiness. Continue good work! BR Adam
For the first time a humble guy teaching science without arrogance, but only focused in simply teaching ! hugs from Sweden (B.A student from Lund University)
I'm a senior high school student from China and I really love your systemic videos, the time and the amount of episodes is moderate, not too long. In China we don’t have this kinda video. There’re only some videos of professional teaching videos of some universities that are too hard for me. No one make this kinda videos seriously. Appreciate you sir, I use VPN to watch your videos.
I am too old to start study now.. bt seriously your way of teaching is too good and it creates a love for physics inside me.. hope every one get a teacher like u in their early life.. so atleast they understand everything clearly..
I started my second grad (physics) around 30 something and got my PhD in astrophysics around 40. I'm pushing 50 next month and I'm still studying the theoretical framework of the standard model and QFT in order to understand quantum phase transitions in the realm of the neutron stars cores (not to mention I have a full-time job, meaning it's a hobby). If you love it, you are never too old for studying. Just grab the books and go for it!!!!
A big thank to you. Your videos helped me understanding Particle and Nuclear Physics with deeper sense and helped me crack Medical Physics interview in Jadavpur University. Wish you all the very best in future too 🙏🏽
Marvelous explanation. Absolutely crisp and no bs. Looking forward to more. I would really love you make a series on mathematics needed to understand GTR and string theory. I am sure it would be great.
Sir I just love your videos. I can spend whole day watching your videos. Better than wasting time in RUclips shorts. Please please keep on many more in future. I have completed the nuclear series.
Ty for making videos that even just curious people like me that have no intentions on having a career on the topic, can understand (most part) and apreciate.
I've studied B.Sc Chemistry in 1969-72! It took 3 months to my Professor to make me understand upto the four Quantum Numbers! From 1990 to 2010, as a teacher I've made my class 9-12 students understand from Dalton's atomic theory to Cyclotron in 3 months, successfully. But this is just awesome!!
Hey, I have been watching your videos for almost a year now and I have to say that I am incredibly excited for this series. Your videos are so amazing and well explained and I have been able to clarify confusions and learn so much from your channel. Can't wait for this excellent series as well!
I feel you deserve an award. I have never come across a teacher in my life, who explains complicated things in such an easy manner. Good Luck Sir. May God Almighty grant you GOOD HEALTH...................... JAI HIND
I was searching for video lectures on particle accelerators and found one of your videos. It was so concise and comprehensive. You are doing excellent job sir, and we're benefited. Lots of love, respect and appreciation 👏🙏 . Thank You! From 🇵🇰
All your videos on Nuclear physics are energetic like the nucleus of the atom. Looking forward for videos in particle physics May I know please you are from which university My heart felt namaskaram and gratitude for making nuclear physics beautiful
Great explanations! Subscribed . I think you explain the basics so well, your knowledge of the subject shines through. Thankyou for sharing your knowledge.
Hello Sir, I just wanted to thank you for supporting us with your playlists. I had an exam last month on particle and nuclear physics. My teacher could not bring anything of what he said closer to me. But because of your playlists I did understand everything for the exam and did pass it with a good grade. Btw, because of that lecture of my professor I was going to quit university. So thanks a lot.
A fine video after a long time. I have a contradictory question to ask : We all often say that the Gravitational Force is the weakest force in the nature. But when I think of a Black Hole or Neutron Star, this is no more the case. As we know that, the Gravitational Field near these objects is extremely strong. So, I think, the comparison of the strength of different forces is relative.
Usually the comparison of relative strength is made in short distances where nuclear forces exist (and gravity is also assumed to exist) Ofcourse over planetary distances, gravity is very powerful but nuclear forces don't play any role. So u are right, the distance at which we make the comparison is relevant, as i also mentioned in video
Sir, please include topics on applications of nuclear physics such as trace elements and their analysis (principle and working of an experiment to study the trace element analysis), radioisotope induced X-ray fluorescence techniques, Neutron activation analysis (NAA), Proton activation analysis (PAA) using nuclear techniques, alpha decay applications to produce electric power, applications of radio isotopes in cancer treatment, agriculture and industry etc.,
Sir, your explenation is so marvelous. I felt immense happy for having found a wonderful teacher for my love of Physics.Here, though I seek a small clarification. In space time curvature the lines are shown as they are bending away from a massive body. In Physics literature, on many occasions it is shown this way only on which I aways have doubt. Pl. Clarify whether they bend towards or away from the massive body. Thanks.
Gravity decides black hole I.e a compact body. Who decided the nucleus and mass of exchange particle. EM is already in action as you nicely explain the chemical forces .
thanks sir its a very helpful lecture to understanding on the basis of nuclear particle .. i was very weak in this topic but after saw your lecture .. i better understand by nuclear concept .. its a vry helpful for me...
Thanks very much for an excellent presentation (as always). The concept of pi mesons being exchanged was a bit blurry. While these are not a boson (as defined by the SM), it was a bit unclear on what exactly they were. But you had to keep it at the higher level to finish this video, so I understand why you just touched on them. Thanks again for the great intro video. Looking forward to detailed ones (hopefully covering this and the concept of parity)
well thanks but you know sir what your problem..... you made me addicted to your lectures and videos i am no longer enjoy reading textbook anymore you epitomize subjects in very appealing way
But how does the weak force ' act'? I get it that a lot of phenomena would not happen without the weak interaction, nuclear fusion for example, but just like the strong force 'acts between' quarks, is there a similar visualization mechanism for the Weak force? P.S. Another great lecture. Keep up the good work!
very nicely presented. one quick thought - sorry to be a contrarian - might sound even silly - are you not standing on the floor becuase of pauli’s exclusion principle and heisenberg’s uncertainity principle, apart from of course gravity and newtons law of action-reaction.
Can you explain how exactly electromagnetic force working in microscopic level like how it works as a glue in binding atoms in molecules or other physical properties of matter.?
sir, 1) p --> n+e(+)+neutrino + beta decay 2) p --> n+pion(+) pimeson exchange theory both these occur inside nucleus right ? if so which is predominant(i mean which occurs the most)? when does a P turns to NEUTRON by +beta decay process and when does P turns to neutron by pi meson exchange ? Edit: ty for this video sir upon completion ive realized pi meson exchange is predominant and happening in Nucleus of every element where as P-N conversion through B decay happens only when one elements turns into other which happens in star as you said. (hope am right if not glad to get corrected)
great thanks for this intelligent explanation .may you please explain maxwell equations .also quantum mechanics but apart from mathematical complexities
What are Antiparticles?
▶ruclips.net/video/IexNXyyYfYk/видео.html
What are Neutrinos?
▶ruclips.net/video/Ukop9e8dAuI/видео.html
Hello sir. I wanted to know from where you collected this information. May I know the refference book name??
@@suryasurya-hm9pz ABSOLUTE MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY:
Time DILATION proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. Einstein's equations are NECESSARILY QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. In fact, the mathematical unification of Maxwell's equations AND Einstein's equations (given the addition of a fourth spatial dimension) proves that ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE; AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma; AS time DILATION proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is expanding OR contracting in and with time. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This is, in fact, CLEARLY proven by BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED IN AND OUT of SPACE AND TIME, as this is CLEARLY proven by time DILATION, F=ma, AND E=mc2. This ALSO explains the cosmological redshift AND the "black hole(s)". Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) ACCORDINGLY, FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE, MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AND A POINT are all then in BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. GREAT !!! This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, and describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Therefore, I have demonstrated the true mathematical UNIFICATION of physics/physical experience AS what is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
By Frank DiMeglio
@@frankdimeglio8216 thank you
Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature)
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together.
------------------------
String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension?
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.
Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. The model grew out of that simple idea.
I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
.
Sir pls make videos on classical mechanics
For those interested, the reason why we use colors for quarks is to explain parallel inverted spectrum's. An inverted spectrum means the presence of one equates to the absence of the other. The presence of a positive red quark means necessarily the absence of a negative red quark, but not necessarily the absence of a blue quark positive or negative.
Love the video, thank you so much for the educational content!
Hello,
I am university student from Czech Republic and I would like to thank you for you sharing that amazing knowledge of yours with everyone. I consider you to be THE ETALON at teaching - explaining and transfering the knowledge. Maybe one day you will write your own book about nuclear chemistry/science topic.
I wish you luck, health and personal happiness.
Continue good work!
BR
Adam
Thank you for the kind words :)
@@FortheLoveofPhysics I have mathematically unified physics. I have proven that E=MC2 IS F=ma.
By Frank DiMeglio
@@frankdimeglio8216 send proof
For the first time a humble guy teaching science without arrogance, but only focused in simply teaching !
hugs from Sweden (B.A student from Lund University)
Wow have you got your degree from lund?
I feel i am so lucky that randomly i reached you videos, thnku for the lectures sir.
Me 2
Me too
Me
I'm about to say
Me tooo❤😂
I'm a senior high school student from China and I really love your systemic videos, the time and the amount of episodes is moderate, not too long. In China we don’t have this kinda video. There’re only some videos of professional teaching videos of some universities that are too hard for me. No one make this kinda videos seriously. Appreciate you sir, I use VPN to watch your videos.
能在这种视频遇到国人也是稀罕
I really happy for come to your channel because I like you explanation 👍
Who cares for voice quality when the lecture explanation is just top notch.......so beautiful, so elegant, just looking like a wow.
Thank you very much. Your videos have the nature of light.
I am too old to start study now.. bt seriously your way of teaching is too good and it creates a love for physics inside me.. hope every one get a teacher like u in their early life.. so atleast they understand everything clearly..
I started my second grad (physics) around 30 something and got my PhD in astrophysics around 40. I'm pushing 50 next month and I'm still studying the theoretical framework of the standard model and QFT in order to understand quantum phase transitions in the realm of the neutron stars cores (not to mention I have a full-time job, meaning it's a hobby). If you love it, you are never too old for studying. Just grab the books and go for it!!!!
Never too late to start
@@rsouza01this comment Genuinely just inspired me.
Brother your concepts are crystal clear!
Great video that kept me enganged and interested throughout!! Thank you for this video and playlist!!
I've no words to thank u sir... U cleared everything .. In such a simple manner.. May Waheguru g bless uh.. 🙏☺
Excellent presentation! Thank you!
Enlightening! Thank you.
A big thank to you. Your videos helped me understanding Particle and Nuclear Physics with deeper sense and helped me crack Medical Physics interview in Jadavpur University. Wish you all the very best in future too 🙏🏽
What a terrific teacher you are ! Kudos !
Thank you so very much. You explain difficulty concepts so very clearly.
Indeed this guy has Love For Physics
Marvelous explanation. Absolutely crisp and no bs. Looking forward to more. I would really love you make a series on mathematics needed to understand GTR and string theory. I am sure it would be great.
Sir I just love your videos. I can spend whole day watching your videos. Better than wasting time in RUclips shorts. Please please keep on many more in future. I have completed the nuclear series.
Ty for making videos that even just curious people like me that have no intentions on having a career on the topic, can understand (most part) and apreciate.
I've studied B.Sc Chemistry in 1969-72!
It took 3 months to my Professor to make me understand upto the four Quantum Numbers!
From 1990 to 2010, as a teacher I've made my class 9-12 students understand from Dalton's atomic theory to Cyclotron in 3 months, successfully.
But this is just awesome!!
Hey, I have been watching your videos for almost a year now and I have to say that I am incredibly excited for this series. Your videos are so amazing and well explained and I have been able to clarify confusions and learn so much from your channel. Can't wait for this excellent series as well!
Thank you. Glad to be of help :)
I feel you deserve an award. I have never come across a teacher in my life, who explains complicated things in such an easy manner.
Good Luck Sir.
May God Almighty grant you GOOD HEALTH...................... JAI HIND
I was searching for video lectures on particle accelerators and found one of your videos. It was so concise and comprehensive. You are doing excellent job sir, and we're benefited.
Lots of love, respect and appreciation 👏🙏 .
Thank You!
From 🇵🇰
From Nepal ❤️
Understanding physics and teaching physics are 2 different things
But you did it in both with very nice explanation.
That makes so much sense...
Thank you sir
I'm expecting more about quantum electrodynamics and chromodynamics
Bahut badiya sir for sharing. His video
I have literally fallen in love with PHYSICS⚛️.❤
Only a Great teacher can do that👨🏫
Thanks a lot🙏🙏
Awesome teaching Sir, I bow to you, thanks.🙏🙏
This lecture is a proof for your love of physics
Thank You Sir for this wonderful job!!!
You proved to be an ANGEL for physics lovers❤️
I am really grateful for these series to you...😇
Amazing quality of explanation
All your videos on Nuclear physics are energetic like the nucleus of the atom.
Looking forward for videos in particle physics
May I know please you are from which university
My heart felt namaskaram and gratitude for making nuclear physics beautiful
Thanku. I am currently teaching in Delhi U
Seriously he teches exceptionally well thanku sir for this series on particle physics
@@FortheLoveofPhysics Time DILATION ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 is F=ma.
By Frank DiMeglio
Great explanations! Subscribed . I think you explain the basics so well, your knowledge of the subject shines through. Thankyou for sharing your knowledge.
Thank You so much bro wonderful explanation
Best Indian Chanel for Particle Physics , I have got.
Hello Sir, I just wanted to thank you for supporting us with your playlists. I had an exam last month on particle and nuclear physics. My teacher could not bring anything of what he said closer to me. But because of your playlists I did understand everything for the exam and did pass it with a good grade. Btw, because of that lecture of my professor I was going to quit university. So thanks a lot.
Your boardwork is awesome. I could visualize sun, tidals...
Your teaching skills are Outstanding sir.
What a lecture man
Wowww
Not bored even a single sec
Sir..i feel lucky i randomly searched for you..thankyou so much
So beautiful explanation, I'm again motivated to do PhD in physics
You are great lecturer. material, speed , clarity
Love and respect from Pakistan. I hope some day your playlists will be most viewed playlists in the RUclips world. Ameen
The effort that is put into this video n also the information it provides is commendable.. really appreciate it
A fine video after a long time.
I have a contradictory question to ask :
We all often say that the Gravitational Force is the weakest force in the nature. But when I think of a Black Hole or Neutron Star, this is no more the case. As we know that, the Gravitational Field near these objects is extremely strong. So, I think, the comparison of the strength of different forces is relative.
Well do u know how strong is strong nuclear force . We don't experience the strong force at our scale that's why your thought is realative
Also gravitational force can't tear apart a atom
Usually the comparison of relative strength is made in short distances where nuclear forces exist (and gravity is also assumed to exist) Ofcourse over planetary distances, gravity is very powerful but nuclear forces don't play any role. So u are right, the distance at which we make the comparison is relevant, as i also mentioned in video
Thank you for taking vedios in english....all students of various place can understand
You really made to love physics😍😍😍😍
Man, you love physics, but I love you (as in reference to your style of teaching).
4 forces of nature.
1) Capacitance.
2) Resistance.
3) Permeability.
4) Permittivity.
Thank you sir for this very presice and understandable video......
Your lectures r really great Thanks for such service to student community
Very interesting and useful video sir..... Thank you sir
Very well explained sir
Phenomenal lecture sir!
Sir, please include topics on applications of nuclear physics such as trace elements and their analysis (principle and working of an experiment to study the trace element analysis), radioisotope induced X-ray fluorescence techniques, Neutron activation analysis (NAA), Proton activation analysis (PAA) using nuclear techniques, alpha decay applications to produce electric power, applications of radio isotopes in cancer treatment, agriculture and industry etc.,
Too good sir... 👍Really lucky to found u:) thanks
Sir, your explenation is so marvelous. I felt immense happy for having found a wonderful teacher for my love of Physics.Here, though I seek a small clarification. In space time curvature the lines are shown as they are bending away from a massive body. In Physics literature, on many occasions it is shown this way only on which I aways have doubt. Pl. Clarify whether they bend towards or away from the massive body. Thanks.
Superb explanation
amazing clarity ... Thanks sir
You are really good sir. I have gained lot from ur lecture
Next level explanation Sir..
Very thankful to you Sir for your nicely explanation about the forces 🙏❤️
Thank you sir,I am a great fan of you.I like your explanation very much
Sir ,Your way of teaching is really easy to understand and it clears all my doughts frequently.god bless you sir😊🙏
Great sir g this lecture is very helpful for us👍
Great sir
Gravity decides black hole I.e a compact body. Who decided the nucleus and mass of exchange particle.
EM is already in action as you nicely explain the chemical forces .
Watching your videos from Pakistan. I have no words to appreciate.
❤️
Very informative thanks sir
But please sir numbering your lectures it will help us to see your videos in a better manner
Thankyou very much sir I understood clearly by watching your videos☺️☺️🌝😊😊
thanks sir its a very helpful lecture to understanding on the basis of nuclear particle .. i was very weak in this topic but after saw your lecture .. i better understand by nuclear concept .. its a vry helpful for me...
Nice video sir we are expecting more sir
Love you sir , what a talent you have
Thank u sir for giving such a awesome lecture ❤
I'm MPhil student and Your lectures help me alot.
Kindly suggest books to study
Sir please do a series on Statistical Mechanics as well. It's quite tough to digest for a BSc student.
Sir, please please do a series on GTR and tensor calculus. You videos are so good I cannot explain.
Thank you very much.
Thanks very much for an excellent presentation (as always). The concept of pi mesons being exchanged was a bit blurry. While these are not a boson (as defined by the SM), it was a bit unclear on what exactly they were. But you had to keep it at the higher level to finish this video, so I understand why you just touched on them. Thanks again for the great intro video. Looking forward to detailed ones (hopefully covering this and the concept of parity)
Will make follow up videos on these topics
Best explanation sir
🙏🙏🙏 love from Rajasthan
Very good and well explained video
The only flaw is that mic quality
well thanks but you know sir what your problem..... you made me addicted to your lectures and videos i am no longer enjoy reading textbook anymore you epitomize subjects in very appealing way
I just see these lecture just one day before my exam .very help full but .that time i cant adjust with time
thankuu so much sir🙏😇...........we r grateful
But how does the weak force ' act'? I get it that a lot of phenomena would not happen without the weak interaction, nuclear fusion for example, but just like the strong force 'acts between' quarks, is there a similar visualization mechanism for the Weak force?
P.S. Another great lecture. Keep up the good work!
very nicely presented. one quick thought - sorry to be a contrarian - might sound even silly - are you not standing on the floor becuase of pauli’s exclusion principle and heisenberg’s uncertainity principle, apart from of course gravity and newtons law of action-reaction.
please upload more videos on particle physics
brilliant sir
Among the 4 fundamental forces, which one is responsible for the electron or electron cloud, not falling into the positively charged nucleus?
Can you explain how exactly electromagnetic force working in microscopic level like how it works as a glue in binding atoms in molecules or other physical properties of matter.?
Save the PLAYLIST on Elementary Particle Physics. Cheers! :)
ruclips.net/p/PLRN3HroZGu2lkRDsRxzqy_WU8NRk6evbD
Newly subscribed just by watching 2mins of your lecture
Thank you!
Thank u sir
Can you provide the notes please?
sir,
1) p --> n+e(+)+neutrino + beta decay
2) p --> n+pion(+) pimeson exchange theory
both these occur inside nucleus right ? if so which is predominant(i mean which occurs the most)?
when does a P turns to NEUTRON by +beta decay process and when does P turns to neutron by pi meson exchange ?
Edit: ty for this video sir upon completion
ive realized pi meson exchange is predominant and happening in Nucleus of every element
where as P-N conversion through B decay happens only when one elements turns into other which happens in star as you said.
(hope am right if not glad to get corrected)
great thanks for this intelligent explanation .may you please explain maxwell equations .also quantum mechanics but apart from mathematical complexities
Superb explain thanks sir