I understand we're not covering the fictional wizard laws but technically Harry would also face a life sentence for using the Imperio curse in the bank.
@@lukesmithreborn3023No. not Bellatrix. The Carrow twin in ravenclaw tower. Because it really worked in that scenario. Bellatrix’s was out of “righteous anger “ and didn’t work
3:56 Even though his magic made her inflate it happened from unintentional and uncontrollable magic that he didn't know he could use and didn't even know existed. Also given the circumstances of his aunt and uncle's unjustified abusive behavior toward him the assault charge could easily be disputed in court
@@Fingernamedkid7 true...though this was before he knew he was a wizard and could not really control at the time. not really sure how that would be viewed
With the snake it would be like putting a toddler on prison because he stole something from a shelf without his parent s realizing but with Marge he did choose to not bring her down. When Vernon asks he refuses not says that he can’t
With all due respect, this library is part of the school he attends. He did not remove any books. The hours were not posted; therefore, he has implied consent to enter the faculty
Also destruction of government property, even in the books they damaged a ton of things in the ministry. I think a large part of these numbers are undestating, many would be much higher, breaking into and out of government institutions.
In Harry Potter 3, Vernon assaulted Harry and obstructed his way , Harry was defending himself using his wand. So he's not guilty of attempted murder, in fact, he never tried to harm anyone, the inflated lady wasn't intentional. In Harry Potter 5, Umbridge tried to torture Harry with Doloris (which is a crime she knows about), something she already did and tries to drug him with truth serum (also a crime), by not saving her from Kidnapping, he saved himself, so it doesn't count.
Harry obviously knew what he was doing as he did it in response to the lady insulting his mum, and never attempted to help her - Vernon is Harry's legal guardian and was allowed to restrain Harry in a citizen's arrest if he suspected he had committed a crime.
@@cinemacopit was accidental magic, his magic reacted to his emotions, whether he felt sorry for it is different and I personally wouldn’t feel any remorse when he’d been repeatedly goaded into losing his temper because of her insulting his parents, the insults were worse in the book and lasted a week straight before he lost his temper
@@cinemacop *I apologize for such a long comment, I looked up from my keyboard after typing it and realized how long it was. You don't have to read it if you don't want to.* In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, in response to Harry's disbelieve at the discovery he's a wizard, Hagrid asks him if there were any "strange things" that happened to him when he was "scared or angry". A witch/wizard's magic is highly undeveloped at a younger age, which is why students are officially admitted to Hogwarts after they turn 11. The Ministry of Magic may have sub laws in place that protect witches/wizards under a certain age so they don't catch the same charges as a full-time student on holiday. That would explain why the ministry never came for Harry when he performed underage magic before going to Hogwarts, because of these sub laws. It could potentially explain why no ministry officials were present at the Hut on the Rock while Hagrid was performing magic, for they could've suspected the magic to be Harry's doing. It's possible, however, that Dumbledore could've sent the Ministry a letter in advance explaining Harry's situation, in which case the Ministry would've ignored the happenings both at Privet Dr and the Hut.
How do you argue culp and false imprisonment in the snake scene? As an under age wizard he has no control over the magic used so his actions aren’t unlawful in just being pushed to the ground.
I feel like these should be separate jurisdictions for wizarding and non-wizarding crimes. Also im not sure tue stuff with the snake at the start or blowing up the aunt are crimes per se, as a young wizard isnt in control of their magic. But in the other hand, im pretty sure the civil aviation authority would have something to say about their uncleared flights
At the zoo, HP didn't know what he was doing, he didn't intentionally remove the glass so he would fall in. Magic just comes out in unpredictable ways when magic users are emotionally pressured. He would be off the hook because he was too young to control it. I'm not so sure about the second case when he blows up the lady though lol.
It's not theft when they take back the Locket, Harry actually owns that, it was taken by RAB (since he got it, and it was Sirius' who owned it after he died, those making it Harry's when Sirius died) then stolen by Mundungus Fletcher, then Umbridge took it from him, and then Harry got it back.
It's complicated. True Umbridge doesn't own it, but neither did RAB. I think Voldemort stole it too, but he would argue that it was rightfully his as the last Skytherin. Can stolen property become un-stolen by stealing it again?
@Blokewood3 but it's possible harry is also descended from salazar slytherin he and voldy are definitely related tho each descended from a Peverelle brother so the locket could technically be a family heirloom to harry too and the locket would have rightfully been voldys if his mother hadn't needed to sell it
@@elizabethdarroch3000 Good luck trying that defense in court. "I didn't steal it your honor, this property might possibly have once belonged to a distant ancestor of mine. Maybe. I'm not sure."
The snake incident and blowing up aunt Marge: Harry had no proper control over his magic. That alone should clear him. (especially when you don't want him to become an obscurial). Attacking Snape: Of course, when it comes to "assisting an offender", Harry could only be charged for that as nobody believed Black was actually innocent. Freeing Buckbeak: By the letter of the law, yeah, that would be a crime. But by the letter of the law Buckbeak should never have been convicted in the first place. Dolores + Centaurs: The centaurs didn't act on Harry's orders nor did he ever take their presence (and anger) in mind. Umbridge made the fault herself to insult the centaurs. Now it can be said that Hermione tried to lure her to Grawp hoping he was get her, but even if that's true, it would be Hermione's crime not Harry as he had no idea what Hermione was up to. Harming Malfoy with Sectumsempra: Of course, Harry didn't know what his curse would do, but I do not know if THAT would be any valid excuse a lawyer could use in his favor. Hermione obliviating the Death-Eaters in the coffee shop: Well, my description says it all Now you forgot the most important crime that tops them all, and Harry did it multiple times. The usage of an unforgivable curse. And the usage of any of these curses will get you a one way ticket to Azkaban (Hermione and Barthy Crouch jr (disguised as Alastor Moody) even state that literally in the moves). So Harry would even without all other crimes having to serve a life long sentence in Azkaban anyway. A quick summary on the top of my memory: Cruciatus: - Bellatrix Lestrange, out of anger due to her murdering his godfather. He fails though, and Bellatrix even teaches him how to use an unforgivable curse properly (in order to mock him). - Amycus Carrow, out of anger due to him spitting in McGonagall's face Imperius: - We even see that in the video, but it was not noted as a crime. Killing Curse (aka Avada Kedavra): - The only unforgivable curse none of the trio members ever used at all, for quite obvious reasons.
You forgot about the time harry used one of the unforgivable curse the crutiats curse in the order of the phoenix which would have gave him life time in prison
Just watched this video today. While true, I actually think his sentence would be even lighter than that if we’re being honest. I feel like some of the crimes that contributed to the 44 years he would not have charges pressed for. Some who were on his receiving end were people that either had already somewhat patched things up with him or they wouldn’t care enough to fight him in court over it. I wouldn’t even count out a pardon for him given he was the one who killed Voldemort.
I am hoping for the best with the reboot, calm Dumbledore, smart Ron and a Hermione that isn't perfect but has human flaws. Snape being just the worst and so on :)
@@keshav9261 That too, I just want it to be as close to an 1:1 as possible . Book accurate duelling not flying around like black smoke or Dumbledore and Tom having a beam battle. Less dramatic Quidditch as there were many rule breaking in the films. I don't want things "improved for the screen"
I'm not sure if he can actually be charged for the snake escaping or false imprisonment as he, despite being pretty happy with the result, didn't really do it on purpose. He doesn't even know that magic is real, yet alone that he can cast it. Same with his aunt, he didn't mean to inflate her, it just happened. his magic reacted to his emotions automatically, hence why he didn't need to use a wand for either event.
From the battle of the ministry in Movie 5 onwards, they are at war and you could probably classify Harry as a Soldier, so would everything from then on still count as crimes or as acts of war and therefore need to be looked at from that POV?
Maybe, but in the 7th book Voldemort wins and by that point onward Harry is no longer a soldier (though he wouldn't have been anyway, seeing as he is a minor), but rather an insurgent or a terrorist.
You should do what if "The Goodnight Killer" was charged for his crimes, some of them include murdering 6 people in the "Black Well Hotel" and possibly even more
Taking someone into the forbiddon forrest and getting them attacked by centaurs may be illegle for someone else, but if it's umbridge then pls take her away, she shouldn't even be considored human.....
5:08 I don't remember if he did that after finding out the truth or not, but if after then was he really assisting an offender? Edit: 5:47 Ok, I guess it doesn't matter.
I would argue Harry used accidental magic in the Sorcerer's Stone, he had no idea he was even a wizard at the time and the Ministry of Magic won't go after a child for doing it
Slavery is only illegal if your slave is human. People still enslave animals all over the world. Such as horses as transportation, or bulls to plow fields. (Although cars and tractors are much more popular in more developed nations.) Since house elves are not humans, their enslavement is not only legal by wizarding law, but by British law, too.
Very true. It wasn’t THAT long ago when humans were enslaved, and that was allowed until it was outlawed. The wizarding world has its own laws, so if slavery ever gets outlawed, only then would Harry or other owners of house elves be in trouble
@@velikan420He would be responsible if he could have expected it, but no person would ever expect to randomly make a glass disappear and appear again.
Yeah, exactly what I was thinking. It would be difficult to prove in court (magical or otherwise) that he had any intent to do that. He didn’t know magic was real yet let alone that he was a wizard; even if he had noticed that “weird” things tend to happen to him that doesn’t mean he attempted to take advantage of this penchant for weird shenanigans to free the snake. Just because he was happy about the eventual result, that does not prove that he caused the events.
Compare this incident with Matilda Wormwood (from the Roald Dahl book)’s plot against Miss Trunchbull, in which she used her telekinetic powers. Her guilt is way more clear than Harry’s in the case of freeing the snake. Unlike Harry, Matilda a) was by that point in the story fully aware of her powers, b) had learnt to control them to a good degree, meaning any use of them was more than likely not accidental, and c) her plot against Trunchbull was planned, ie premeditated. By contrast, Harry a) had no idea at the time that he was a wizard/had powers, b) even if he was aware of the tendency for weird things to happen in his vicinity he couldn’t control his “weird luck” to kick in on command in exactly the way he wanted to (so even if he was internally wishing that the snake could be free, he couldn’t have assumed that that wish would be realised as a result), and c) did not go to the zoo with the intention of freeing the snake. Assuming that the reality of Matilda and Harry’s powers could be proved in court, it would be more reasonable for Matilda to be found guilty of her plot against Trunchbull than for Harry to be found guilty for freeing the snake. Either way, both are young kids, not even teenagers, when these incidents happened, so I doubt they’d get taken to court (unless Trunchbull actually died; her fate is left kind of unclear but I assume she was just scared out of town).
@@velikan420Still, according to the rules of the ministry, he isn't responsible for using magic until he goes to Hogwarts because he can't really control it
I dont get it. Its if harry potter was charged for his crimes in real life or in his world? because he used Imperium and this is one of the unforgivble curses(and sime more things).
Well, so did the Marauders and not to mention Voldemort himself (the latter even committing murder during his school years). And they too always got away with that.
It would never matter what Harry had done anyways, because he’s the chosen one, not that it makes him exempt but Dumbledore would never allow Harry to be expelled, he’s too important to not receive proper education. His life was hard enough already
1:00 it was accidental magic, 2:01 dobby did way worse before, harry did almost nothing, 3:24 the teacher was supposed to defeat the basilisk so they just took him with them, 3:58 it was an accident (he used his magic in accident, without wand), 5:28 it wasnt a fair decision (from the justice) but alr, 5:49 sirius was inocent, 6:51 she spied all forms of comunications but not her own fireplace and harry would never be able to go against the centaurs: theyre very strong and both of them werent with wands, 7:11 they entered it as guests in a guest entrance and he was triyng to save a life, 7:40 he didnt knew that this spell would do that and he didnt thought the spells he found in the book vere as dark, 8:29 they were just stunned and she just obliviated the memories of seeing them, 8:52 they were falsily accused to be bad ppl and couldnt reach mundungus to have the horcrux that they wanted to destroy to save the world from Voldemort. Also, he was under 18 in almost every part (u didnt counted imperio as life-sentence, so its not magical world rules) and when not, it was in a war and he was doing it to stop the war.
1:00 - thanks that very much tru2 2:01 - yes but that doesn't mean he had the right to do this. 3:24 Lockhard had the right to change his mind, and withdraw at any time, they forced him down. Still kidnapping. 3:58 - yes thanks for pointing that out. 5: 49 - I am not sure if that changes anything or not. 6:51 - I would like to add that, 1 he never harmed her and Hermine came up with everything. Plus this was also done in self defence. Nor had harry any obligation to save her, since any action he could have take would have put him at risk. 8:52 - would add that he said "Find them" not "Kidnapp them" He never told anyone to commit a crime. But he went along with it, when they came with them. It's tricky. I don't think the fact that they were accused of anything would change much. But it was directly a part of the whole war, so maybe?
this is a cool perspective because when ur watching the movies, u just kind of dismiss all the bad stuff he does because its mostly for the greater good
With some stuff I agree, but most of this is stuff you would just get expelled for or get baned from ever using a wand again, like Hagrid. And you have to keep in mind that most of this happend, while he was a minor, so there you would also have to adjust the verdicts.
I don't know how much it contributes to the sentence, but the first crime is clearly unintentional. Edit: I think a threat of strangulation is more a threat of assault than a threat to kill. Edit 2: I think the snowballs + pants pulling would even if technically illegal would get laughed out of any court room, and would at worst result in community service.
Magic performed by wandless wizard children is not criminalized, as Snape explains to Lily in a flashback. It is basically presumed to be accidental. This deference extends to some pretty serious conduct, as we see there are no consequences for the young Tom Riddle committing theft, animal cruelty, and perhaps even kidnap and torture.
For the movies he would also be looking at 2 lifetime sentences in Azkaban for using the Imperius Curse on the Gringotts Goblin & using Crucio on Bellatrix. Book Harry would be even worse with 4 (maybe 5) life sentences. -x2 imperius on Yaxley and the Goblin -x2 Crucio on Bellatrix and Amycus Carrow -Attempted Crucio on Snape (not sure how exactly they judge failed unforgivables)
Technically Sirius Black was not the bad guy so you can't really charge 13 year old Harry for aiding and abetting, but even I can't let him off the hook for attacking a teacher. 15 Year old Harry didn't go to the department of mysteries to steal his own prophecy, he only went there to rescue Sirius from Voldemort because he thought what he saw in his head was happening before he could escape Umbridge, and besides, just like real horses, the Thestrals knows the way back to Hogwarts anyway. Uh 16 year old Draco attacked 16 year old Harry first, Harry didn't know what that spell did to enemies until he used it before Draco could use Cruciatus on him, and he did feel bad about what he just did. Draco did use the Imperious Curse on Katie Belle to deliver the cursed necklace to Albus Dumbledore; Harry was not wrong in his accusation.
@@JKBDTS; No, I didn't in fact; he was just reacting to Harry because of their 6 year rivalry, that is not why Draco was crying; Harry always had a little trouble getting the big picture out of a large situation, you can't really blame him for being angry about Draco attacking his friend and teammate; plus Draco didn't want Harry to find out how complicated of a situation he was being put in, and besides it is very typical Slytherin behavior to not trust or confide in someone that is from a different Hogwarts House, just as students of the other three Hogwarts houses were raised to rival and grow up to distrust Slytherin house in turn. Now do you see how complicated the situation is between the 2 sixth year students? Nothing about The Wonderous World of Magic is as simple as it seems on the surface.
1:56 Technically saying that if he didn’t leave before his bones healed back he might strangle him doesn’t count as threats. While this may sound dumb there are two things that make it not hold up. One he said if he doesn’t leave by x time which means there is an if there and two he said might. These two things make it not count and the reason I know this is because my brother is schizophrenic and made similar threats and when we called the cops to get help they said they couldn’t do anything because of those two reason. We had another issue where he said similar stuff in a fast food place full of people so plenty of witnesses and the cops gave us the same reason. (Different county than the first one)
If Macavity were charged for his crimes, Case no. 84 Name: Macavity, Aliases: The Mystery Cat, The Hidden Paw, The Napoleon of Crime, Nationality: British, Height Cat Sized, Weight: Slender, DOB:?, Jurisdiction: London, England, United Kingdom, Evidence: Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats (1939) CATS May (11, 1981 - May 11, 2002) CATS Home Video (1998) CATS Revival (2017) CATS (2019) And Forward, He's broken every Human Law, He breaks The Law of Gravity. He's The Bafflement of Scotland Yard, The Flying Squads Despair, Where ever The Deed took Place Macavity's not there, Fleeing The Crime Scene. Case no. 85 Mungojerrie, Case no 86 Name: Rumpelteazer Aliases: The Beautiful Crowd Pleaser, Case no. 87 Name: Little Joe, Aliases: The Moonlight Cat, The Terror of The Night, The Terror of The House, The Youngest Jellicle, Son of The Everlasting Cat, Nationality: American Height: Cat Weight: Slender DOB: 05 / 08 / 1987 Jurisdictions: United States, United Kingdom, Evidences An Ode To Rumpelteazer (1999) What a Brat is The Moonlight Cat (1999) Little Joe: The Youngest Jellicle (1999) Created by Moonbeams (1999)
Well: 1st book: murder of a teacher, trespassing, assisting in the concealment of a illegally owned dragon, standing by as a fellow student was stupefied. 2nd book: driving a magical car to Hogwarts, destruction of property, forcing a teacher to come with him into a dangerous chamber against his will. 3rd year: assaulting a teacher(snape), illegally sneaking into private property( the tunnel in honeydukes), and using a time turner to free a suspected criminal. 4th year: not actually that much, he might be suspected of murder of Cedric, and he was using supplies stolen from Snapes office. 5th: performing unlicensed teaching of defensive spells, knowingly letting a ministry official be taken by centaurs to almost certain death and incriminating her( rightfully), sneaking into private and secret property, destruction of almost all time turners and prophecies, attempted use of cruciatus curse on Bellatrix and nearly using killing curse on her. 6th year: use of sectumsempra on Malfoy, attempting cruciatus curse and sectum sempra on Snape, etc. 7th year: use of imperius, cruciatus curse, assault of ministry officials, kidnapping and impersonating ministry officials and robbing them of clothes, breaking into a bank and robbing it, plus settting a very dangerous creature loose.
In movie 5 Harry uses the Cruciatus Curse on Bellatrix, as an unforgivable that is a life time in Azkaban and you showed him use the Imperious Cruse on the goblin that would have the same results, there could be a argument that goblins don't have the same rights as wizards and that it would not be lifetime using it on a "magical creature"
I think it worked, she did fall on the ground (at least in the movie, can't remember the book scene right now.) it didn't work well but it still did something.
@@TFAric it's been a while since I read the books, but I seem to recall her not being that affected, laughing it off and telling harry he had to mean it
Dolores Umbridge: *_infinity years at azkaban_* (like, imperiusing her into making a horcrux, then binding both that horcrux and her semi-mortal body to remain there forever)
1:01 harry did that accidentally and Dudley got himself in there by pressing his face against the glass 1:22 he was excused from a lot of this stuff 2:01 if somebody caused you to loose a bone and ingure you would you also threaten the thing responisble, what harry said was very just and wouldn’t of done it 2:32 it was a little sleepy juice and they were fine, they weren’t kidnapped but hidden till they awaken 2:59 this time it’s a joke Jim, a lot of people suffer from this every year, but harry and Ron just asked Draco some questions then left 3:29 kidnapping once again isn’t valid here as 3 of them jumped in there and Ron just made sure he stayed away from sharp objects till they left 3:58 the movie said these 2 actions wouldn’t send him to Azkaban 4:25 anyone could’ve used that entrance and people could’ve used the entrance before him
1:22 But it assumes he wasn't. 2:01 His life wasn't being threatened and he could tell an authority, so that's why it's illegal I think 2:32 Doesn't make it legal 2:59 Same as earlier 3:29 Not sure what you're trying to say, but this could be justified I think because they were saving Ginny 4:25 I don't think it justifies it.
You forgot that Harry Potter used Cruccio against Bellatrix Lestrange in Movie 5 after Bellatrix Lestrange killed Sirius Black!!! So Harry Potter would face a Lifetime Sentence in Azkaban!!!
@@KadeStringer2.0 It is - the use of any of the three Unforgivable Curses is a life sentence in prison. Multiple people on both sides say it - Hagrid, Barty Crouch Jr, Barty Crouch Sr, Snape and I believe Neville Longbottom all make references to it being a life sentence. There are of course exceptions - if you can prove that there was good reason (i.e, an Auror uses one in the line of duty) or that you were under the influence of the Imperius Curse, you won't be prosecuted.
but the curse didn't work / didn't went off. So I guess it doesn't count? (I mean I know that usually it doesn't change anything, if you try to murder and fail due to you incompetence or not. But you have to keep in mind that it failed because he didn't want to do it.
3:54 As much as I think Harry had a right to do that I also feel sorry for the uncle (IDK his name) because the uncle knows what the wand can do and although it's a threat I think Harry had a right to it. Don't let a muggle threaten someone who knows magic.
You could also consider kidnapping Draco in the shrieking shack scene. If you look at the clip, Harry drags him over a fence, said fence is probably a property line.
I mean idk if it would count as torture since it didnt work but it would still have been illegal(depending on if the spell would have to be preformed correctly for it to be counted as the use of said spell) but during the heist those spells were legal under voldemorts rule so iguess those wouldnt count Potentially + 1 life sentence?
I know that this isn't exactly fully serious, but everything that happens in year 5 while he's at Hogwarts, should be discounted on the grounds that he was trying to 'defend' himself and his classmates from Umbrige, if the ministry was being rational Umbrige herself would already have been fired and arrested early in the school year for assault through the use of cruel and unusual punishment(making Harry write lines with the enchanted bloodquill.) Also I know we're going with movoe canon here, but the grievous bodily injury was self- defense since in the books Malfoy was in the process of casting Crucio when Harry had cast Sectumsempra.
I understand we're not covering the fictional wizard laws but technically Harry would also face a life sentence for using the Imperio curse in the bank.
But it says Azkaban
As Voldemort had control of the ministry and its laws in this case Imperio or any other dark magic spells were legal.
Plus his use of the Crucio curse against bellatrix
well no its only a life sentance if he had used it on another human
@@lukesmithreborn3023No. not Bellatrix. The Carrow twin in ravenclaw tower. Because it really worked in that scenario. Bellatrix’s was out of “righteous anger “ and didn’t work
Harry: **throws snowballs at people and pulls their pants down**
*6 months in Azkaban*
😂
Bro i'm like 13 years then
Isn't there like something with defending others instead of self defence?
@@melonenlord2723yes
Thts sexual harassment 💀💀💀
“If Harry Potter was charged for his crimes.” Dumbledore said calmly.
"HARRY! DID YOU MURDER LORD VOLDEMORT?" The portrait of Dumbledore asked calmly.
I CANNOT, I CANNOT 😂😂😂 YOU HAD TO BRING IT UP!
“HaRrY pOtTaH dId YoU gEt ChArgEd FoR yOuR cRiMeS?!!” Dumbledore said in the movie 😂
3:56 Even though his magic made her inflate it happened from unintentional and uncontrollable magic that he didn't know he could use and didn't even know existed. Also given the circumstances of his aunt and uncle's unjustified abusive behavior toward him the assault charge could easily be disputed in court
Plus Fudge tells him : "The ministry doesnt send ppl to Azkaban for blowing up their aunts"
Same could be said about letting the snake out and trapping Dudley
@@Fingernamedkid7 true...though this was before he knew he was a wizard and could not really control at the time. not really sure how that would be viewed
With the snake it would be like putting a toddler on prison because he stole something from a shelf without his parent s realizing but with Marge he did choose to not bring her down. When Vernon asks he refuses not says that he can’t
True
**breaks into restricted section of government facility**
**Charged with Theft and Burglary**
With all due respect, this library is part of the school he attends. He did not remove any books. The hours were not posted; therefore, he has implied consent to enter the faculty
Also destruction of government property, even in the books they damaged a ton of things in the ministry. I think a large part of these numbers are undestating, many would be much higher, breaking into and out of government institutions.
@@alberthaystowniiijd2821 the library, yes. However, you need a teachers note to enter the restricted section
@@alberthaystowniiijd2821department of mysteries not the school library smh
agree
In Harry Potter 3, Vernon assaulted Harry and obstructed his way , Harry was defending himself using his wand. So he's not guilty of attempted murder, in fact, he never tried to harm anyone, the inflated lady wasn't intentional.
In Harry Potter 5, Umbridge tried to torture Harry with Doloris (which is a crime she knows about), something she already did and tries to drug him with truth serum (also a crime), by not saving her from Kidnapping, he saved himself, so it doesn't count.
Harry obviously knew what he was doing as he did it in response to the lady insulting his mum, and never attempted to help her - Vernon is Harry's legal guardian and was allowed to restrain Harry in a citizen's arrest if he suspected he had committed a crime.
😍😍😍😍@@cinemacop
@@cinemacopit was accidental magic, his magic reacted to his emotions, whether he felt sorry for it is different and I personally wouldn’t feel any remorse when he’d been repeatedly goaded into losing his temper because of her insulting his parents, the insults were worse in the book and lasted a week straight before he lost his temper
Can I request Trixie Tang and Jorgen Von Strangle from Fairly Odd Parents who are from California or Dimmsdale @@cinemacop?
@@cinemacop *I apologize for such a long comment, I looked up from my keyboard after typing it and realized how long it was. You don't have to read it if you don't want to.*
In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, in response to Harry's disbelieve at the discovery he's a wizard, Hagrid asks him if there were any "strange things" that happened to him when he was "scared or angry". A witch/wizard's magic is highly undeveloped at a younger age, which is why students are officially admitted to Hogwarts after they turn 11. The Ministry of Magic may have sub laws in place that protect witches/wizards under a certain age so they don't catch the same charges as a full-time student on holiday. That would explain why the ministry never came for Harry when he performed underage magic before going to Hogwarts, because of these sub laws. It could potentially explain why no ministry officials were present at the Hut on the Rock while Hagrid was performing magic, for they could've suspected the magic to be Harry's doing. It's possible, however, that Dumbledore could've sent the Ministry a letter in advance explaining Harry's situation, in which case the Ministry would've ignored the happenings both at Privet Dr and the Hut.
How do you argue culp and false imprisonment in the snake scene? As an under age wizard he has no control over the magic used so his actions aren’t unlawful in just being pushed to the ground.
bro the criminal profile had me dying😂
I feel like these should be separate jurisdictions for wizarding and non-wizarding crimes. Also im not sure tue stuff with the snake at the start or blowing up the aunt are crimes per se, as a young wizard isnt in control of their magic. But in the other hand, im pretty sure the civil aviation authority would have something to say about their uncleared flights
That would be like saying manslaughter isnt a crime cause they didn't mean to
@@Qbarr323I mean,if you wished someone would die and a series of events that were caused by you unintentionally killed them,would it be murder?
@@user-et2dx5du7e no it would be manslaughter
Quirrell touching Potter: No problem
Potter touching Quirrell: AH, IT BURNS!!
Ah, how the tables have turned
@@dabigcheeze9689 Nah its how the turns have tabled get it right mate🤣
@@TerribleGamer9 alright mate, keep your hair on 💀💀
@dabigcheeze9689 Nah it's hair your keep on
@@VlerkeDamne fr
"6 Months in Azkaban" lol
Why are you here? The Boy who Lived...
I threw snowballs at people!
Disgusting!
Aren't you forgetting the criminal offense of that hair in his fourth year?
All charges are now aqquited
That hair was glorious
In my opinion, please don't send him to jail, he was so attractive 💀💀
Not really, that's one of the few times his hair has looked the way the book describes it.
Lol fr it didnt suit him
If Gru from Minions was charged for his crimes
Yep
Nah Better wait till Despicable Me 4 cameout
@@Ritsukazed When i said Gru from Minions, i said from Despicable Me
@@Ritsukazedthe video probably released next year cuz waiting for digital version of the movie.
Good point@@Ritsukazed
At the zoo, HP didn't know what he was doing, he didn't intentionally remove the glass so he would fall in. Magic just comes out in unpredictable ways when magic users are emotionally pressured. He would be off the hook because he was too young to control it.
I'm not so sure about the second case when he blows up the lady though lol.
If Madea was Charged for Her Crimes.
Do that next.
The part where he pointed his wand at Vernon was clearly self-defense, as Vernon touched him first
3:59 yeah vernon touched harry potter first.
It's not theft when they take back the Locket, Harry actually owns that, it was taken by RAB (since he got it, and it was Sirius' who owned it after he died, those making it Harry's when Sirius died) then stolen by Mundungus Fletcher, then Umbridge took it from him, and then Harry got it back.
It's complicated. True Umbridge doesn't own it, but neither did RAB. I think Voldemort stole it too, but he would argue that it was rightfully his as the last Skytherin. Can stolen property become un-stolen by stealing it again?
@@Blokewood3 I wouldn't say you can steal a Horcrux, they are kinda their own really, not really things anymore
@Blokewood3 but it's possible harry is also descended from salazar slytherin he and voldy are definitely related tho each descended from a Peverelle brother so the locket could technically be a family heirloom to harry too and the locket would have rightfully been voldys if his mother hadn't needed to sell it
@@elizabethdarroch3000 Good luck trying that defense in court.
"I didn't steal it your honor, this property might possibly have once belonged to a distant ancestor of mine. Maybe. I'm not sure."
@@Blokewood3I don't think it can
The snake incident and blowing up aunt Marge: Harry had no proper control over his magic. That alone should clear him. (especially when you don't want him to become an obscurial).
Attacking Snape: Of course, when it comes to "assisting an offender", Harry could only be charged for that as nobody believed Black was actually innocent.
Freeing Buckbeak: By the letter of the law, yeah, that would be a crime. But by the letter of the law Buckbeak should never have been convicted in the first place.
Dolores + Centaurs: The centaurs didn't act on Harry's orders nor did he ever take their presence (and anger) in mind. Umbridge made the fault herself to insult the centaurs. Now it can be said that Hermione tried to lure her to Grawp hoping he was get her, but even if that's true, it would be Hermione's crime not Harry as he had no idea what Hermione was up to.
Harming Malfoy with Sectumsempra: Of course, Harry didn't know what his curse would do, but I do not know if THAT would be any valid excuse a lawyer could use in his favor.
Hermione obliviating the Death-Eaters in the coffee shop: Well, my description says it all
Now you forgot the most important crime that tops them all, and Harry did it multiple times. The usage of an unforgivable curse. And the usage of any of these curses will get you a one way ticket to Azkaban (Hermione and Barthy Crouch jr (disguised as Alastor Moody) even state that literally in the moves). So Harry would even without all other crimes having to serve a life long sentence in Azkaban anyway.
A quick summary on the top of my memory:
Cruciatus:
- Bellatrix Lestrange, out of anger due to her murdering his godfather. He fails though, and Bellatrix even teaches him how to use an unforgivable curse properly (in order to mock him).
- Amycus Carrow, out of anger due to him spitting in McGonagall's face
Imperius:
- We even see that in the video, but it was not noted as a crime.
Killing Curse (aka Avada Kedavra):
- The only unforgivable curse none of the trio members ever used at all, for quite obvious reasons.
Ron tried to on nagini
You forgot about the time harry used one of the unforgivable curse the crutiats curse in the order of the phoenix which would have gave him life time in prison
Only 44 years thats light for the amount of crimes
Just watched this video today. While true, I actually think his sentence would be even lighter than that if we’re being honest. I feel like some of the crimes that contributed to the 44 years he would not have charges pressed for. Some who were on his receiving end were people that either had already somewhat patched things up with him or they wouldn’t care enough to fight him in court over it. I wouldn’t even count out a pardon for him given he was the one who killed Voldemort.
But in azkaban with dementors staring you down every minute. I don't think so. Sirius Black went insane from just 12 years
3:28 They kidnapped him, because they thought he may be needed to save Ginny, so maybe self-defense for that as well.
That's not how that works. Although I think he should get the lightest sentence because of circumstances.
@CJClark-dh2jr It can't be an under duress crime or sth like that?
The only crime in real life is that reboot!
I am hoping for the best with the reboot, calm Dumbledore, smart Ron and a Hermione that isn't perfect but has human flaws. Snape being just the worst and so on :)
@@TFAric 😒 Give me a break...
@@patrickspencer6550 Alright! Recess will be 20 minutes. After the break we are doing a "What Hogwarts house are you?" test.
I hope they potray more of Harry's sassiness throughout the show
@@keshav9261 That too, I just want it to be as close to an 1:1 as possible . Book accurate duelling not flying around like black smoke or Dumbledore and Tom having a beam battle. Less dramatic Quidditch as there were many rule breaking in the films.
I don't want things "improved for the screen"
Judge: "Harry James Potter are hereby sentenced to 44 years, in Azkaban."
Harry: "Is that all?"
Judge: "And you're also expelled from Hogwarts."
"Is that all?" As if it's not over half his life
@@flextape467 It's not.
Wizards live to 137 on average in Harry Potter :p
I'm not sure if he can actually be charged for the snake escaping or false imprisonment as he, despite being pretty happy with the result, didn't really do it on purpose. He doesn't even know that magic is real, yet alone that he can cast it.
Same with his aunt, he didn't mean to inflate her, it just happened.
his magic reacted to his emotions automatically, hence why he didn't need to use a wand for either event.
Harry Potter and the 44 years of hard time
From the battle of the ministry in Movie 5 onwards, they are at war and you could probably classify Harry as a Soldier, so would everything from then on still count as crimes or as acts of war and therefore need to be looked at from that POV?
Maybe, but in the 7th book Voldemort wins and by that point onward Harry is no longer a soldier (though he wouldn't have been anyway, seeing as he is a minor), but rather an insurgent or a terrorist.
POV: me when the headteacher finds out what I do outside of school.
So we're just gonna ignore the fact that he used the cruciatus curse on Bellatrix in OOTP for which he would get life in Azkaban?
You should do what if "The Goodnight Killer" was charged for his crimes, some of them include murdering 6 people in the "Black Well Hotel" and possibly even more
Taking someone into the forbiddon forrest and getting them attacked by centaurs may be illegle for someone else, but if it's umbridge then pls take her away, she shouldn't even be considored human.....
More like "if Harry wasn't the chosen one" and didn't have the headmaster in his pocket (or vice versa)
That part at the end with Vernon saying "Justice!" was brilliant.
Ah, yes.
Expelled for destroying the dark lord and restoring peace in both the muggle world & wizarding world...
I love how the thumbnail says the 12 year old harry is 7 feet tall. Makes sense
Lmao I noticed it too
5:08 I don't remember if he did that after finding out the truth or not, but if after then was he really assisting an offender?
Edit: 5:47 Ok, I guess it doesn't matter.
The incident with the python at the zoo: Harry wouldn't go to jail for something he did as a kid that was entirely an accident.
- Mr. Judge! Harry's personality at these moments was being controlled by you-know-who in the form of a horcrux!
- All charges are dismissed.
"You're a criminal Harry....
You're a hairy criminal."
And a criminal who did something right and deserves pardon
You forgot the iM A wOT
I would argue Harry used accidental magic in the Sorcerer's Stone, he had no idea he was even a wizard at the time and the Ministry of Magic won't go after a child for doing it
Slavery is only illegal if your slave is human. People still enslave animals all over the world. Such as horses as transportation, or bulls to plow fields. (Although cars and tractors are much more popular in more developed nations.)
Since house elves are not humans, their enslavement is not only legal by wizarding law, but by British law, too.
Very true. It wasn’t THAT long ago when humans were enslaved, and that was allowed until it was outlawed. The wizarding world has its own laws, so if slavery ever gets outlawed, only then would Harry or other owners of house elves be in trouble
3:55 to be fair, Vernon was assaultimg Harry and Harry had no intentions of harming Vernon. He pointed it at Vernon in self defence
Vernon was attempting to save his sister
1:00 Should he really be charged with that if he didn't even know he's a wizard and he did it on accident? Unless I'm missing context.
Just because he didn't intent to do it doesn't mean it didn't happen and he wasn't responsible for it.
@@velikan420He would be responsible if he could have expected it, but no person would ever expect to randomly make a glass disappear and appear again.
Yeah, exactly what I was thinking. It would be difficult to prove in court (magical or otherwise) that he had any intent to do that. He didn’t know magic was real yet let alone that he was a wizard; even if he had noticed that “weird” things tend to happen to him that doesn’t mean he attempted to take advantage of this penchant for weird shenanigans to free the snake. Just because he was happy about the eventual result, that does not prove that he caused the events.
Compare this incident with Matilda Wormwood (from the Roald Dahl book)’s plot against Miss Trunchbull, in which she used her telekinetic powers. Her guilt is way more clear than Harry’s in the case of freeing the snake. Unlike Harry, Matilda a) was by that point in the story fully aware of her powers, b) had learnt to control them to a good degree, meaning any use of them was more than likely not accidental, and c) her plot against Trunchbull was planned, ie premeditated. By contrast, Harry a) had no idea at the time that he was a wizard/had powers, b) even if he was aware of the tendency for weird things to happen in his vicinity he couldn’t control his “weird luck” to kick in on command in exactly the way he wanted to (so even if he was internally wishing that the snake could be free, he couldn’t have assumed that that wish would be realised as a result), and c) did not go to the zoo with the intention of freeing the snake. Assuming that the reality of Matilda and Harry’s powers could be proved in court, it would be more reasonable for Matilda to be found guilty of her plot against Trunchbull than for Harry to be found guilty for freeing the snake.
Either way, both are young kids, not even teenagers, when these incidents happened, so I doubt they’d get taken to court (unless Trunchbull actually died; her fate is left kind of unclear but I assume she was just scared out of town).
@@velikan420Still, according to the rules of the ministry, he isn't responsible for using magic until he goes to Hogwarts because he can't really control it
how about crimes that umbridge had done, her changes of them would be 10 times worse then harry's.
You should do a ”if Raymond Reddington was charges for his crimes from The Blacklist
Harry kills Voldemort, all considering him as a hero and from all that charges in conclusion being pardoned.
I dont get it. Its if harry potter was charged for his crimes in real life or in his world? because he used Imperium and this is one of the unforgivble curses(and sime more things).
Real life
He should have gotten a Breaking and Entering charge for, well, breaking and entering into Umbridge's office.
Its umbidge so its fine
Burglary charge - no breaking and entering in UK
@@cinemacop but its umbridge so he's fine
11:33 seeing “self defense” after this is the funniest moment in this video
How would he got just 2 years for manslaughter???
Minimum
Wouldn't he be pardoned for defeating Voldemort and because Kingsley Shacklebolt is the new minister
If being gorgeous was a crime, then Daniel Radcliffe would have been sentenced to life imprisonment
Honestly everyone should've been suspicious of why Harry was never expelled from Hogwarts when he literally breaks multiple rules every single year
I think it’s Because he is the chosen one or he just never got caught
@@DUAPLAYZ and he save the school and lives everytime, so
Well, so did the Marauders and not to mention Voldemort himself (the latter even committing murder during his school years). And they too always got away with that.
It would never matter what Harry had done anyways, because he’s the chosen one, not that it makes him exempt but Dumbledore would never allow Harry to be expelled, he’s too important to not receive proper education. His life was hard enough already
I think you forgot the 2 times Harry used the cruciatus cures, which would’ve landed him 5 years each
Crucio is actually punishable by life imprisonment. He only actually used it one time that counted, though.
The first charge shouldn’t count because he did not know he was magical yet as this was before he got his hogwarts letter and learn to control it
1:00 it was accidental magic, 2:01 dobby did way worse before, harry did almost nothing, 3:24 the teacher was supposed to defeat the basilisk so they just took him with them, 3:58 it was an accident (he used his magic in accident, without wand), 5:28 it wasnt a fair decision (from the justice) but alr, 5:49 sirius was inocent, 6:51 she spied all forms of comunications but not her own fireplace and harry would never be able to go against the centaurs: theyre very strong and both of them werent with wands, 7:11 they entered it as guests in a guest entrance and he was triyng to save a life, 7:40 he didnt knew that this spell would do that and he didnt thought the spells he found in the book vere as dark, 8:29 they were just stunned and she just obliviated the memories of seeing them, 8:52 they were falsily accused to be bad ppl and couldnt reach mundungus to have the horcrux that they wanted to destroy to save the world from Voldemort. Also, he was under 18 in almost every part (u didnt counted imperio as life-sentence, so its not magical world rules) and when not, it was in a war and he was doing it to stop the war.
Just because someone did worse, doesn't mean it's legal to do these stuff. Also he was reckless for using the spell on Draco.
1:00 - thanks that very much tru2
2:01 - yes but that doesn't mean he had the right to do this.
3:24 Lockhard had the right to change his mind, and withdraw at any time, they forced him down. Still kidnapping.
3:58 - yes thanks for pointing that out.
5: 49 - I am not sure if that changes anything or not.
6:51 - I would like to add that, 1 he never harmed her and Hermine came up with everything. Plus this was also done in self defence. Nor had harry any obligation to save her, since any action he could have take would have put him at risk.
8:52 - would add that he said "Find them" not "Kidnapp them" He never told anyone to commit a crime. But he went along with it, when they came with them. It's tricky. I don't think the fact that they were accused of anything would change much. But it was directly a part of the whole war, so maybe?
He knew Sectumsempra was for enemies. He did not know what exactly it did, but he knew enough.
Dumbledore said calmly: Harry go to Azkaban!!!
this is a cool perspective because when ur watching the movies, u just kind of dismiss all the bad stuff he does because its mostly for the greater good
3:40 perfect cut during Marge’s balloon scene, lmao
With some stuff I agree, but most of this is stuff you would just get expelled for or get baned from ever using a wand again, like Hagrid. And you have to keep in mind that most of this happend, while he was a minor, so there you would also have to adjust the verdicts.
The boy who broke the law
If Vladimir Makarov was charged for his crimes (OG Modern Warfare trilogy)
his list of crimes would pretty much be the entire plot
@@Underworlder5 There's also some other crimes that were highlighted in the No Russian intro when Shepherd opened up Makarov's file to Allen.
Next one: Lincoln Clay from Mafia III, please.
I personally dont think the first charge should count
I don't know how much it contributes to the sentence, but the first crime is clearly unintentional.
Edit: I think a threat of strangulation is more a threat of assault than a threat to kill.
Edit 2: I think the snowballs + pants pulling would even if technically illegal would get laughed out of any court room, and would at worst result in community service.
That's actually very little considering how many crimes there were on this list
Magic performed by wandless wizard children is not criminalized, as Snape explains to Lily in a flashback. It is basically presumed to be accidental. This deference extends to some pretty serious conduct, as we see there are no consequences for the young Tom Riddle committing theft, animal cruelty, and perhaps even kidnap and torture.
I want to be Harry Spotter, the guy who lifted
I’ll wait for Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader if it happens someday.
By what law should we judge Anakin Skywalker?
@@ДаняШУЛИКИН war crimes would definitely count there
Hagrid: You’re a criminal Harry.
Harry: I’m a what?
For the movies he would also be looking at 2 lifetime sentences in Azkaban for using the Imperius Curse on the Gringotts Goblin & using Crucio on Bellatrix.
Book Harry would be even worse with 4 (maybe 5) life sentences.
-x2 imperius on Yaxley and the Goblin
-x2 Crucio on Bellatrix and Amycus Carrow
-Attempted Crucio on Snape (not sure how exactly they judge failed unforgivables)
Technically Sirius Black was not the bad guy so you can't really charge 13 year old Harry for aiding and abetting, but even I can't let him off the hook for attacking a teacher. 15 Year old Harry didn't go to the department of mysteries to steal his own prophecy, he only went there to rescue Sirius from Voldemort because he thought what he saw in his head was happening before he could escape Umbridge, and besides, just like real horses, the Thestrals knows the way back to Hogwarts anyway. Uh 16 year old Draco attacked 16 year old Harry first, Harry didn't know what that spell did to enemies until he used it before Draco could use Cruciatus on him, and he did feel bad about what he just did. Draco did use the Imperious Curse on Katie Belle to deliver the cursed necklace to Albus Dumbledore; Harry was not wrong in his accusation.
But Draco felt threatened by Harry, did you miss that?
@@JKBDTS; No, I didn't in fact; he was just reacting to Harry because of their 6 year rivalry, that is not why Draco was crying; Harry always had a little trouble getting the big picture out of a large situation, you can't really blame him for being angry about Draco attacking his friend and teammate; plus Draco didn't want Harry to find out how complicated of a situation he was being put in, and besides it is very typical Slytherin behavior to not trust or confide in someone that is from a different Hogwarts House, just as students of the other three Hogwarts houses were raised to rival and grow up to distrust Slytherin house in turn. Now do you see how complicated the situation is between the 2 sixth year students? Nothing about The Wonderous World of Magic is as simple as it seems on the surface.
4:32 the noise you make when your about to bust
1:56 Technically saying that if he didn’t leave before his bones healed back he might strangle him doesn’t count as threats.
While this may sound dumb there are two things that make it not hold up. One he said if he doesn’t leave by x time which means there is an if there and two he said might.
These two things make it not count and the reason I know this is because my brother is schizophrenic and made similar threats and when we called the cops to get help they said they couldn’t do anything because of those two reason.
We had another issue where he said similar stuff in a fast food place full of people so plenty of witnesses and the cops gave us the same reason. (Different county than the first one)
also harry was under 18 in some parts, if youre not counting imperio as life sentence than ure using muggle's law
Harry was under 18 for all of this. His 17th birthday is at the start of the seventh book/movie, and his 18th doesn't come.
If Macavity were charged for his crimes, Case no. 84 Name: Macavity, Aliases: The Mystery Cat, The Hidden Paw, The Napoleon of Crime, Nationality: British, Height Cat Sized, Weight: Slender, DOB:?, Jurisdiction: London, England, United Kingdom, Evidence: Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats (1939) CATS May (11, 1981 - May 11, 2002) CATS Home Video (1998) CATS Revival (2017) CATS (2019) And Forward, He's broken every Human Law, He breaks The Law of Gravity. He's The Bafflement of Scotland Yard, The Flying Squads Despair, Where ever The Deed took Place Macavity's not there, Fleeing The Crime Scene. Case no. 85 Mungojerrie, Case no 86 Name: Rumpelteazer Aliases: The Beautiful Crowd Pleaser, Case no. 87 Name: Little Joe, Aliases: The Moonlight Cat, The Terror of The Night, The Terror of The House, The Youngest Jellicle, Son of The Everlasting Cat, Nationality: American Height: Cat Weight: Slender DOB: 05 / 08 / 1987 Jurisdictions: United States, United Kingdom, Evidences An Ode To Rumpelteazer (1999) What a Brat is The Moonlight Cat (1999) Little Joe: The Youngest Jellicle (1999) Created by Moonbeams (1999)
Well:
1st book: murder of a teacher, trespassing, assisting in the concealment of a illegally owned dragon, standing by as a fellow student was stupefied.
2nd book: driving a magical car to Hogwarts, destruction of property, forcing a teacher to come with him into a dangerous chamber against his will.
3rd year: assaulting a teacher(snape), illegally sneaking into private property( the tunnel in honeydukes), and using a time turner to free a suspected criminal.
4th year: not actually that much, he might be suspected of murder of Cedric, and he was using supplies stolen from Snapes office.
5th: performing unlicensed teaching of defensive spells, knowingly letting a ministry official be taken by centaurs to almost certain death and incriminating her( rightfully), sneaking into private and secret property, destruction of almost all time turners and prophecies, attempted use of cruciatus curse on Bellatrix and nearly using killing curse on her.
6th year: use of sectumsempra on Malfoy, attempting cruciatus curse and sectum sempra on Snape, etc.
7th year: use of imperius, cruciatus curse, assault of ministry officials, kidnapping and impersonating ministry officials and robbing them of clothes, breaking into a bank and robbing it, plus settting a very dangerous creature loose.
Next one is if Cloud Strife was charged for his crimes.
1:01 Technically the false imprisonment part doesn’t actually count because that didn’t actually happen in the book.
Bro harry potter is literally a kid if anything you need to be charged this is anta ang is uncle
Do if NATHAN DRAKE WAS CHARGED FOR HIS CRIMES
In movie 5 Harry uses the Cruciatus Curse on Bellatrix, as an unforgivable that is a life time in Azkaban and you showed him use the Imperious Cruse on the goblin that would have the same results, there could be a argument that goblins don't have the same rights as wizards and that it would not be lifetime using it on a "magical creature"
Iirc doesn't the cruciatus curse fail, so it would only be "attempted cursing" or something lol
I think it worked, she did fall on the ground (at least in the movie, can't remember the book scene right now.) it didn't work well but it still did something.
@@TFAric it's been a while since I read the books, but I seem to recall her not being that affected, laughing it off and telling harry he had to mean it
10:29 i never realized that but he literally just used the imperious curse which is supposed to be an unforgivable curse
Dolores Umbridge: *_infinity years at azkaban_* (like, imperiusing her into making a horcrux, then binding both that horcrux and her semi-mortal body to remain there forever)
1:01 harry did that accidentally and Dudley got himself in there by pressing his face against the glass
1:22 he was excused from a lot of this stuff
2:01 if somebody caused you to loose a bone and ingure you would you also threaten the thing responisble, what harry said was very just and wouldn’t of done it
2:32 it was a little sleepy juice and they were fine, they weren’t kidnapped but hidden till they awaken
2:59 this time it’s a joke Jim, a lot of people suffer from this every year, but harry and Ron just asked Draco some questions then left
3:29 kidnapping once again isn’t valid here as 3 of them jumped in there and Ron just made sure he stayed away from sharp objects till they left
3:58 the movie said these 2 actions wouldn’t send him to Azkaban
4:25 anyone could’ve used that entrance and people could’ve used the entrance before him
I plan to finish this later
1:22 But it assumes he wasn't.
2:01 His life wasn't being threatened and he could tell an authority, so that's why it's illegal I think
2:32 Doesn't make it legal
2:59 Same as earlier
3:29 Not sure what you're trying to say, but this could be justified I think because they were saving Ginny
4:25 I don't think it justifies it.
You forgot that Harry Potter used Cruccio against Bellatrix Lestrange in Movie 5 after Bellatrix Lestrange killed Sirius Black!!! So Harry Potter would face a Lifetime Sentence in Azkaban!!!
That’s not true
@@KadeStringer2.0 It is - the use of any of the three Unforgivable Curses is a life sentence in prison. Multiple people on both sides say it - Hagrid, Barty Crouch Jr, Barty Crouch Sr, Snape and I believe Neville Longbottom all make references to it being a life sentence. There are of course exceptions - if you can prove that there was good reason (i.e, an Auror uses one in the line of duty) or that you were under the influence of the Imperius Curse, you won't be prosecuted.
but the curse didn't work / didn't went off. So I guess it doesn't count? (I mean I know that usually it doesn't change anything, if you try to murder and fail due to you incompetence or not. But you have to keep in mind that it failed because he didn't want to do it.
If Nicholas Mendoza was charged for his crimes (Battlefield Hardline)
fun fact but Harry only used the Sectumsempra curse because Malfoy started saying Crucio and Harry didn't want to be hit by an unforgivable curse
Dumbledore after seeing this video: "900000000 points to gryffindor!"
It does make you wonder what the wizarding laws surrounding the use of potions such as the Polyjuice Potion are.
The first one wasnt even a crime it was accidentel magic
"harry potter was charged for his crimes, fifty points to griffindor"
albus percival wulfric brian dumbledore
3:54 As much as I think Harry had a right to do that I also feel sorry for the uncle (IDK his name) because the uncle knows what the wand can do and although it's a threat I think Harry had a right to it. Don't let a muggle threaten someone who knows magic.
He wouldn't have a right to do that assuming that he attempted to murder Vernon's sister on purpose. If on accident then I think he would.
You could also consider kidnapping Draco in the shrieking shack scene. If you look at the clip, Harry drags him over a fence, said fence is probably a property line.
Great work!
Must do Michael and some others from "The Office"... +"Trailer Park Boys".
you forget about Crucio, the torture Curse, Imperio and Crucio would give him 2x life in Prison
"The use of any one of them on a fellow human being is enough to earn a life sentence in Azkaban."
So the imperius on the goblins dosn't count.
@@jimydog007 He used it on Bellatrix in Order of the Phoenix and on one of the Carrows in Deathly Hallows. Still two life sentences.
@@curtisevans8413 Oh you're right. I've totally forgot that.
Ok that’s a lot of years but if ur also count the books it’s a life sentande
cruciatus on bellatrix and a couple of imperius curses while robbing gringotts left the chat
I mean idk if it would count as torture since it didnt work but it would still have been illegal(depending on if the spell would have to be preformed correctly for it to be counted as the use of said spell) but during the heist those spells were legal under voldemorts rule so iguess those wouldnt count
Potentially + 1 life sentence?
Max 2 years+ expelled because he is a child(when he did it).
I know that this isn't exactly fully serious, but everything that happens in year 5 while he's at Hogwarts, should be discounted on the grounds that he was trying to 'defend' himself and his classmates from Umbrige, if the ministry was being rational Umbrige herself would already have been fired and arrested early in the school year for assault through the use of cruel and unusual punishment(making Harry write lines with the enchanted bloodquill.)
Also I know we're going with movoe canon here, but the grievous bodily injury was self- defense since in the books Malfoy was in the process of casting Crucio when Harry had cast Sectumsempra.
Can narrow it down more:
Use of the Imperius & Cruciatus Curse - Life sentence...
And Expelled from Hogwarts.