Ikr, like did people not Pay attention to police or driving school. It's literally ILLEGAL to drive without documentation in the first place. Like how is he going to say it's irrelevant!!
My son was in the exact same situation years ago. He was 19, driving down a multi lane freeway, a girl pulls out in front of him, coming out of a mall parking lot. They crashed. She blamed him because he was speeding, and I have little doubt that he was in fact speeding. However, like this case, she was at fault. She even took him to court. Judge ruled in my son's favor. She was suing for her car damages and everyone in her car took ambulances to the hospital, so she was wanting medical cost as well. I can't remember if she had insurance or not. My son was scared to death when he called me that night. It totaled his car and only had liability insurance.
@@mls2023speeding is subjective, not objective, no court can determine whether or not someone was speeding, they can determine who's at fault and speed is almost never a factor, that's why JJ said it "doesn't matter". He was wrong from the start for not having insurance, even if the other guy was at fault, not having insurance puts the pig at fault because he has unclean hands.
@@hlee-w9uat this day and age, they can read out cars and the system registers the last speed you drove, thats how they determined a deadly crash in my country, and how the accident happend. But if there are extreme breaking lines (idk the english word), it can give and indication. So without a reasonable doubt.
It is irrelevant if it's not his fault but evidently it was. 250 bucks is rediculous JJ isn't in touch with old car's that are in excellent condition she goes by that stupid book. If I had a 65 mustang and someone smashed into my butt and did 5k worth of damage she'd say it's a old piece of junk antique, (which antiques are 100 years old or older btw) and give me maybe 500 dollars smh
@@EmotiveEmblem Yes he should've, but if the other guy was at fault and smashed into him you can't reward the guy that caused the accident because he has insurance. Many people can't afford insurance but have to drive to work, this isn't NYC, Europe etc many city's don't have much public transportation
@@broeheemed32 It takes two to tangle. If a man doesn’t want children, he shouldn’t have sex with a woman. Why? Because life will find a way, basic biology. So both will be paying for the child.
@@Dallas_K according to the defendant, they did. 1:36. And the Judge would know if them disallowing would or would not have legal merit. they aren't stupid when it comes to law. Judge Judy, a sensationalist tv personality, did in fact have a career as both a lawyer and as a Judge, prior to tv fame. (mostly focused on family court) Doesn't change the fact that judges are very well versed in legal issues.
He is allowed to make a fool of himself in America, However, the firm now knows his judgement is suspect and pray to god he is not using the firm's vehicles.
She's not stating law either........ he can't be seen because of no insurance but if you do your homework little buddy andy over their was still at fault
"See that door? Thaaaat's the one." An office manager at a law office thinks he can show up without clean hands across from Judge Judge in front of 10 million people and blame the accident on the plaintiff. And he was the one with a stop sign lol. He needed to spend an afternoon watching Judge Judge episodes and pay attention specifically to the traffic accident cases. Lol.
I forget the case, but there's one where the defendant tries to play that card and JJ says "go to college, then go to law school, then pass the bar, then come back here and tell me what's relevant." Shuts him right up lol.
Honestly, I think the guy with no insurance is right. Who caused the crash is infinitely more important than insurance because one of these things is life-threatening and one is A PIECE OF PAPER.
@@UltimaKeyMaster You may think that, however the law does not agree with you. Even without the missing insurance, the defendant is at fault for the accident due to the stop sign. Even if the kid was speeding, the presence of the third green car shows that the street was not safe to cross, therefore the defendant ran a stop sign.
@@MalakStarfire The law not agreeing with me doesn't equal the law is infinitely correct forever. Rules are meant to be tested to see if they make sense, not followed as gospel for all time. That's the entire reason we still have humans as judge and jury (well in actual jury cases), to test said laws. And I say the guy who *was speeding and caused an accident* is the guy who caused an accident, not a guy pulling out from a stop sign getting sideswiped by some speeding prick. A piece of paper should not magically absolve an accident causer of all guilt, because then they get away with murder and you're gonna go "but the insurance tho."
Yep & they always have the same group of excuses: it just lapsed yesterday, I thought I had i sirance, it thought my wife paid it & she thought I paid it
I am sure that this is the first time the insurance lapsed and it just happened yesterday while they were in the hospital in a coma while busy being a single parent.
Except I don't think Judy even entertained the notion that the plaintiff caused the accident. She heard "no insurance" and plugged her ears. Rare L from her.
Correction: It illegal to DRIVE without auto insurance. Yo can own a car and have it sit on your driveway - Have it towed to your residence after purchase.
Nice paint alone tells you he liked the truck and its worth a bit. Even at 21 years old , still should have at least got $1,000. Its totaled. Idiot defendant ruined it. Today a truck like that is $4,500+.
Plaintiff was not happy with the $250, I don’t blame him. The inconvenience of towing it, missing work, and now finding another car (registration, insurance, plates, etc). He should have gotten more. Also this accident could have resulted in serious injuries or even death.
If you face a Stop sign, do not proceed until the traffic is clear. That's why you have a stop sign. You have to yield to the traffic without a Stop sign.
The big belly guy can’t keep his mouth shut. He can’t understand that it’s over once you drive without insurance it’s over. No talking, no questions, no excuses
Loved that Judge Judy had the defendant point to his car with the stop sign showing that he's already lost. If you have a stop sign and no one else does, you have to wait till it's clear to go, otherwise this can happen. She's just focusing on the insurance because this could have all been settled by them and not have to bother her about it.
Judge Judy is right about insurance. The insurance is meant to cover accidents. Lets say Person A has insurance and Person B has insurance. If Person A causes the accident, Person A's insurance pays for Person's B damages for medical. Person B's insurance will pay for a rental for like 30 days or so. Now lets take this example in the case. Person A has insurance and Person B does not. Person B causes the accident. Who is going to pay for Person A's medical? Who is going to pay for Person A's car damages?
Person a and person b? LMAO! No it is Defendant that caused the accident and had no insurance at the time. If he is found guilty, he has to pay out of pocket for all medical bills and car repairs by order of the court. No need to make it sound so difficult, when it is easy to figure out who pays for what.
It's as simple as "it's the defendants fault because he was illegally driving on the roads. If he hadn't been, the crash wouldn't have happened. If he had insurance, it still would have been his fault because he had a stop sign and the plaintiff didn't. The plaintiff had the right of way."
It’s the fact that it’s ILLEGAL to drive without insurance. If he had followed the law, he wouldn’t have been driving and the accident wouldn’t have happened.
@@AminaBeans205 That is true but they do not care. I work in a personal injury law firm that does car accidents. I have seen so many cases with one or more parties don't have insurance. Our clients are mostly screwed if the person that hits them don't have insurance.
Everyone always says "they didn't know". Are they for real? Insurance hounds the heck out of you for payment with explicit explanation that coverage will cease. 😂
Things JJ neither likes nor tolerates * people who drive without insurance * scammers * people who abuse disability * able bodied ppl who don’t work * squatters * litigants / witnesses who shout out. * fibbers * litigants who show up unprepared
She also does not like when someone files a false restraining order against someone, and does not like when a parent (especially females) tries to restrict the other parent from seeing their children.
I agree. As the owner of an older paid off car in great condition, if someone hits me, their fault I am skrood. My truck is a 93, runs like a dream, clean, paid off, the city values it at just over $500 For registration purposes. I would have to put myself in debt for years for a new car if I had it wrecked
@@radolfkalis4041Lol that’s not how it works. You pay $1000 for a vehicle and restore it to something totally different you would have receipts for it and you can get it appraised or have it estimated. Since your only car value is $500 you would only get what you paid and if you put any money to it bring it to court and they will consider it as long as an accident was totally not your fault.
JJ said "don't mention classic to me" In all the years I've been watching her, I have NEVER EVER seen her award a decent amount for a classic car. She has the same opinion of them, as she has with Pit Bulls. She won't tolerate either.
I laughed when I heard the guy works for a law firm and said he can’t say which one. Probably it was because the law firm didn’t want their name associated with this dumb case. They knew he was in the wrong driving without insurance.
He has a lot of class, that man. He mentors kids on the side. A really good guy. The posts where the dopey people keep saying Judge Judy threw him under the bus, just shows how little some people understand. It takes more than 15 minutes to produce a show. This is the one she had planned all along. Byrd is smooth and a real class act.
That dude works in a law office but kept saying "The insurance has nothing to do with this." My guy is ILLEGAL to drive without insurance. If your car has no insurance, you shouldn't be driving it. Period. So stubborn
As she said many many times, you have to come to court with clean hands. He was actively breaking the law while driving without proper insurance before any accident occurred.
@joelb1299-and never tell her you’re on disability either! And whatever you do, don’t tell her you used your welfare money to buy presents or go on vacation!
Moreover than that It ain't so much admitting is the problem It's if to dance round with glib or equivocal answers about any of her inquiry if you confess right when she puts the question to ya I've seen people who are honest about their need for welfare and stuff get what they wanted in court if you got something that you know you're not as proud of yourself this time cuz you had to take help or whatever from the government own up to it right away and then she's going to be merciful it's going to be because of a she knows you're telling the truth and be that when you answer and you're telling the truth she knows you ain't trying to patski around and give her a bunch of hoodwink and kind of answer
@@WeAreNotAmused she really frowns upon ppl who loan money to others using their welfare money. Nor does she approve of fathers waiting for a court date before sending support money.
Thank you for the professional, clear recorded screen contribution of care to your viewers. Hopefully the others who do not follow your care for the viewers will take heed to your hard work.
$250? gee that's all? oh well, better than nothing I suppose. Guy had right of way....end of story. I can't believe the defendant pushed so hard when he was wrong on both issues....no insurance and HE had the stop sign.
He shouldn't have driven without insurance and he shouldn't have gone through a stop sign. Period. NEVER drive without insurance. Someone who runs a law office should know that.
The ridiculous Troy Stoffel trying to tell JJ that his having no car insurance had nothing to do with it sure got shut down quickly! LOL And HE worked in a law office?? LMAOO What a fool!
Defendant: I won’t be in for a few days. I need to go on Judge Judy. Employer: for what? Defendant: a car accident while I was driving without insurance. Employer: …..DO NOT MENTION OUR NAME!!!!!
Bad lawyers. No really good lawyer would have him on the payroll. I worked for lots of attorneys and this guy is no credit to anyone. Just and arrogant idiot who actually thinks he can argue with the JUDGE! No courtroom would allow that, but JJ knows just what to do.
The point is: If you get into an accident while you are uninsured, you should not be on the road to begin with, you ARE the problem and AT FAULT. You should not have even been on the road to begin with
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Just don't come to court if you don't have insurance on your car. It's over before it even begins.
Ikr, like did people not Pay attention to police or driving school. It's literally ILLEGAL to drive without documentation in the first place. Like how is he going to say it's irrelevant!!
But at the same time you can't not show up if you have a law suit against you. That is a automatic loss regardless.
Correct me if i am wrong.
Even if he had insurance, he was done before it started, he had a stop sign. End of story!
But how else are the defendants going to educate JJ on what's relevant to the case and what's not?
FAAAAAACTS
The law firm told him you better not say our name on tv 😂😂🤦🏽♀️
You know it!!! lol they definitely don't regret telling him after this episode 😂
Right? 😂😂😂
LOL!!! Any lawyer who sided with him in this case should be disbarred!
Uhh, ok….
Especially if he didn’t have any car insurance 😂😂😂😂
Okay, let's assume the insurance doesn't matter AND that the plaintiff was speeding... there is still a stop sign!
My son was in the exact same situation years ago. He was 19, driving down a multi lane freeway, a girl pulls out in front of him, coming out of a mall parking lot. They crashed. She blamed him because he was speeding, and I have little doubt that he was in fact speeding. However, like this case, she was at fault. She even took him to court. Judge ruled in my son's favor. She was suing for her car damages and everyone in her car took ambulances to the hospital, so she was wanting medical cost as well. I can't remember if she had insurance or not. My son was scared to death when he called me that night. It totaled his car and only had liability insurance.
@@mls2023speeding is subjective, not objective, no court can determine whether or not someone was speeding, they can determine who's at fault and speed is almost never a factor, that's why JJ said it "doesn't matter". He was wrong from the start for not having insurance, even if the other guy was at fault, not having insurance puts the pig at fault because he has unclean hands.
@@hlee-w9uat this day and age, they can read out cars and the system registers the last speed you drove, thats how they determined a deadly crash in my country, and how the accident happend. But if there are extreme breaking lines (idk the english word), it can give and indication. So without a reasonable doubt.
@@hlee-w9uSpeeding absolutely is objective. If you’re going 5 over, you’re speeding.
Yep. It all stops at the stop sign. You may not proceed until it is safe to do so. All ends there.
Byrd: “you see that door? …. Yeah that’s the one” 😂😂😂😂😂
I died laughing when he said that 😂
Such a shame he wasn't brought back for her new series!
Very rude, of course he see the door
@@peterdavis8471Not very rude he was doing his job!
LMFAO @@peterdavis8471
Dude was toast once he said he had no insurance and had the gall to say that him having no insurance was “irrelevant” to the crash 😂
...the nerve, what a disgusting pig.
I'm surprised JJ didn't just laugh at that point and give the plaintiff whatever he asked for.
It is irrelevant if it's not his fault but evidently it was. 250 bucks is rediculous JJ isn't in touch with old car's that are in excellent condition she goes by that stupid book. If I had a 65 mustang and someone smashed into my butt and did 5k worth of damage she'd say it's a old piece of junk antique, (which antiques are 100 years old or older btw) and give me maybe 500 dollars smh
@m42037 JJ has said in the past that she doesn't reward people breaking the law, fault or no fault. The guy should've had insurance 🤷🏻♂️
@@EmotiveEmblem Yes he should've, but if the other guy was at fault and smashed into him you can't reward the guy that caused the accident because he has insurance. Many people can't afford insurance but have to drive to work, this isn't NYC, Europe etc many city's don't have much public transportation
She threw him out for the fun of it 😂 since they were all leaving seconds after 😂
YES, I agree hahahaha.
I enjoyed every second of Byrd showing Chris the exit door! 😂
-#cheers-- for byrd !-
To establish authority.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
3:44- JJ: "He thinks this is cocktail hour" I was howling!😂😂😂
I KNOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤪🤪🤪😅😅😅😅
Also hilarious, « now you can put him out…. »
@@tavonfenwick-yb5xv And seconds later "All parties are excused"😂😂😂😂
The defendant does not have insurance and works at a law office? Definitely does not work for a personal injury law office.
Lol!😂
He is dumb.
He did however take the time to print up Plaintiff's viola history. What a heel. 😂
He refused to give the name of the law office he worked for. That was the only smart thing he did.
@@gingercake0907 They probably warned him that he was fired if he said or did anything to publicly associate their practice with him.
No insurance, no paying the rent, no child support payments, and being rude to JJ = a dismissed case
Don't forget child support payments. She was a prosecutor in family court, she doesn't suffer deadbeats lightly.
@@ACMusiclandthats right!! Got it!
@@ACMusicland Piss on your child extortion. Woman up and GET A JOB and support the children YOU chose to have.
@@broeheemed32 It takes two to tangle. If a man doesn’t want children, he shouldn’t have sex with a woman. Why? Because life will find a way, basic biology. So both will be paying for the child.
@broeheemed32 She doesn't discriminate with gender. I've seen her call out plenty of deadbeat moms. They deserve every second of it.
As a witness, you’re not allowed to advocate for the litigant. The judge will hear your testimony, and that’s about it.
No, not allowed to act like a moron and got kicked out for being a moron. He was a poor witness.
You’re allowed, but it makes you untrustworthy
You’re a faithful JJ watcher! I see your comments here daily. I’m here too 😃
@@clasijasi I love JJ! 11AM every morning here in LA, I watch it from my office. 😊
@@DonGrigorianFishingwow that’s cool. I wonder how it is to live there! Hello from bama(a town) in Africa
Oh chris you just had to open your mouth and get your self thrown out. 😂 😂
😂👏🏻👏🏻
clearly he doesn't watch the show lol
I cannot believe believe the defendant works for a lawyer and they allowed him to go to court and make a fool of himself!
I am betting they told him he better not mention the Firms name
They cannot disallow it.
@@Dallas_K according to the defendant, they did. 1:36. And the Judge would know if them disallowing would or would not have legal merit. they aren't stupid when it comes to law. Judge Judy, a sensationalist tv personality, did in fact have a career as both a lawyer and as a Judge, prior to tv fame. (mostly focused on family court) Doesn't change the fact that judges are very well versed in legal issues.
He is allowed to make a fool of himself in America, However, the firm now knows his judgement is suspect and pray to god he is not using the firm's vehicles.
Maybe that was another riddle hidden within an enigma wherein the attorney felt it would be. A teachable. Moment for the individual to experience
Imagine thinking you’re the chosen one that will win against an insurance argument against J-Ju. 😂
The unclean hand's doctrine applies
You shoulda wrote Jew ju. Haha
Hey, I didn't realize Jimmy Pesto Jr.'s nickname could be applied to Judge Judy too. That's clever.
@@eddievastag7818no. No they shouldn't. 😒
J-Ju is perfect love it 😂😂😂😂😂
Wow he’s an office manager and he can’t afford insurance for a 20 year old van 😂
He said he thought his wife had paid it.
A MINI VAN How the hell did he squeeze to get in the flipping thing, never mind drive it.
By Judys hair and the discussion, this was probably 2014. So 9 year old van.
I love that they’re sitting here telling the judge the law 😂
REALLY stupid people are experts at being stupid.
She's not stating law either........ he can't be seen because of no insurance but if you do your homework little buddy andy over their was still at fault
@mastabla3ta684 not at all. He was still in front of a stop sign and shouldn't of pulled out as the oncoming vehicle has right of way.
Yeah especially those two idiots.
Just saw this one on TV a few days ago. Always hilarious when someone gets thrown out. 😂
Even funnier when they don't go out willingly.
🎉 Yes yes & yes it's hilarious 😅
“I’m saying judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of….” hilariously savage.
Defendant: "So you're saying that.."
Judge Judy: "I'm saying judgement for the plaintiff"
JJ is a savage 😂
She killed that one 😂
Judy does NOT play 😂😂😂 also Byrd with the see that door? 😂😂😂😂
The best parts 😂
3:26
Chris: "Can I say something?"
Judge Judy: "No."
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
"See that door? Thaaaat's the one." An office manager at a law office thinks he can show up without clean hands across from Judge Judge in front of 10 million people and blame the accident on the plaintiff. And he was the one with a stop sign lol. He needed to spend an afternoon watching Judge Judge episodes and pay attention specifically to the traffic accident cases. Lol.
He needs to retake a drivers licence test, read that booklet again
Byrd! Haha.
Office Manager in a Law Firm!!!! He probably emptied the bins and cleaned the toilets, that's why he didn't want to admit the company he worked for.
Gotta love when people tell the judge what is and isn't legally relevant to the case.
I forget the case, but there's one where the defendant tries to play that card and JJ says "go to college, then go to law school, then pass the bar, then come back here and tell me what's relevant."
Shuts him right up lol.
ruclips.net/video/IqXqV46mdtw/видео.htmlsi=cogone5NE249SDxk
^ maybe that?
Honestly, I think the guy with no insurance is right. Who caused the crash is infinitely more important than insurance because one of these things is life-threatening and one is A PIECE OF PAPER.
@@UltimaKeyMaster You may think that, however the law does not agree with you. Even without the missing insurance, the defendant is at fault for the accident due to the stop sign. Even if the kid was speeding, the presence of the third green car shows that the street was not safe to cross, therefore the defendant ran a stop sign.
@@MalakStarfire The law not agreeing with me doesn't equal the law is infinitely correct forever.
Rules are meant to be tested to see if they make sense, not followed as gospel for all time. That's the entire reason we still have humans as judge and jury (well in actual jury cases), to test said laws.
And I say the guy who *was speeding and caused an accident* is the guy who caused an accident, not a guy pulling out from a stop sign getting sideswiped by some speeding prick.
A piece of paper should not magically absolve an accident causer of all guilt, because then they get away with murder and you're gonna go "but the insurance tho."
If he was driving so recklessly why would the defendant think it was a good idea to start to cross through the lanes..
Exactly so that makes him even dumber😅
My thoughts too..
Talking about stating the obvious. Best comment
The guy's too fat to be driving anyway.
Exactly! What I was thinking ..... Goobers; "Look, a speeding train! Let's pull out in front of it! Derp!"
I’m always amazed at people who tell judge Judy what is irrelevant. Did you watch this show before you came on it?
I doubt ANY judge would appreciate that.
You are definitely right there. What an idiot that guy is. An arrogant idiot with a drunk witness. Almost a trifecta. @@barbarak2836
And as always, the defendant who caused the accident did not have insurance at the time of the accident he caused.
Yep & they always have the same group of excuses: it just lapsed yesterday, I thought I had i sirance, it thought my wife paid it & she thought I paid it
I am sure that this is the first time the insurance lapsed and it just happened yesterday while they were in the hospital in a coma while busy being a single parent.
@@angssi4068 *insurance 🙂
Lol
Except I don't think Judy even entertained the notion that the plaintiff caused the accident. She heard "no insurance" and plugged her ears. Rare L from her.
I love it when Byrd tosses someone out!
He doesn’t toss anyone out unless JJ tells him to.
The plaintiff's face dropped when he heard $250. He thought he was going to get classic value added on and walk away with $4,000 😂
Greed seems to be eternal.
JJ screamed at him that she wasn’t doing “classics”. 🤣🤣🤣
Tbf it might be a clean S10. If it drives well , he should have got more than $250. Look at the paint alone telld you he has thousands invested in it.
I lost when JJ said you can't pull out, you can't pull out... I laughed louder than i should have...😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😆😂😆
It’s a scientific fact that eating your food will taste better while watching JJ.
yesssss!!!!!
Omg so true I’m eating right now lol
Lemme try this out one sec
Edit ( you was right...... This cheese steak is hitting the spot)
Lol..eating canolis and drinking coffee as we speak
😂😂👏👏
Came to court thinking it’s a COCKTAIL HOUR
Judge you’re a SAVAGE
It is illegal to not have auto insurance, meaning if you didn't have it, Judge Judy will never, EVER side with you.
Correction: It illegal to DRIVE without auto insurance. Yo can own a car and have it sit on your driveway - Have it towed to your residence after purchase.
To be completely fair and annoyingly technical, it’s legal to drive without insurance in New Hampshire and Virginia.
Doctorate of clean hands
@@krustyincyo can own a car 😂
As a teacher, I have to bring out my inner Judge Judy. I just love this woman.
People don't understand. If you have no insurance. The Vehicle would NOT be there. Should be Parked. Not on Street.
Actually, my favorite moment was the plaintiff calling a 1993 Chevy S10 bought in 2014 for $1,000 ad likely used as a beater a 'Classic'. 😂😂
Nice paint alone tells you he liked the truck and its worth a bit. Even at 21 years old , still should have at least got $1,000. Its totaled. Idiot defendant ruined it. Today a truck like that is $4,500+.
This is just ridiculous 😭😂 you have to wait at a stop sign
Plaintiff was not happy with the $250, I don’t blame him. The inconvenience of towing it, missing work, and now finding another car (registration, insurance, plates, etc). He should have gotten more. Also this accident could have resulted in serious injuries or even death.
Yes, he should gave gotten way more. Any vehicle that starts is worth at least a thousand.
Absolutely, idky JJ gave him so little money when the damage was so severe and the defendant had no insurance
he should not have been speeding.
@@kaiserschnitselsrThere is no proof that he was speeding.
@@kaiserschnitselsrso you think this obese hog without insurance wouldn’t LIE about the man speeding?
If you face a Stop sign, do not proceed until the traffic is clear. That's why you have a stop sign. You have to yield to the traffic without a Stop sign.
The plaintiff should have gotten way more than $250.
Yeah I was surprised that that's all she gave him, the truck was borderline totalled and the guy that the KBB estimate
Where did she get $250 from?
@@joeb1522probably the plaintiffs deductible
Totally Agree!
Calibrate: he only paid £1,000 for the vehicle, so it wasn't worth more than that ... I think it was quite generous
Now we know why the law firm told him not to publish their name 🤣🤣
Defendant: I know what stop signs are for.
Jerry Seinfeld: I don't think ya do.
I was thinking the same thing!
Lololol TY!!
Defendant: "I know what Stop signs are for."
Narrator: _(He did not, in fact, know what Stop signs were for)_
You can't come to court with "unclean hands" and expect to be ruled in your favor
A direct quote from Judge Judy herself
If you go to Court with no insurance, don’t bother to go PERIOD.
The big belly guy can’t keep his mouth shut. He can’t understand that it’s over once you drive without insurance it’s over. No talking, no questions, no excuses
None of this would have happened had he stayed home that day because he didn’t have insurance.
An idiot is an idiot, is an idiot.
"I know what stop signs are for"
LMFAO. I'm pretty sure you don't.
Loved that Judge Judy had the defendant point to his car with the stop sign showing that he's already lost. If you have a stop sign and no one else does, you have to wait till it's clear to go, otherwise this can happen.
She's just focusing on the insurance because this could have all been settled by them and not have to bother her about it.
And JJ viewers already knew the outcome as soon as she started with the defendant.
Insurance is also relevant but stop sign makes it very clear
" he was flying , he was cruising " 😂
Chris? Chris? CHRis? CHRIS!
Judge Judy is right about insurance. The insurance is meant to cover accidents. Lets say Person A has insurance and Person B has insurance. If Person A causes the accident, Person A's insurance pays for Person's B damages for medical. Person B's insurance will pay for a rental for like 30 days or so. Now lets take this example in the case. Person A has insurance and Person B does not. Person B causes the accident. Who is going to pay for Person A's medical? Who is going to pay for Person A's car damages?
Person a and person b? LMAO! No it is Defendant that caused the accident and had no insurance at the time. If he is found guilty, he has to pay out of pocket for all medical bills and car repairs by order of the court. No need to make it sound so difficult, when it is easy to figure out who pays for what.
It's as simple as "it's the defendants fault because he was illegally driving on the roads. If he hadn't been, the crash wouldn't have happened. If he had insurance, it still would have been his fault because he had a stop sign and the plaintiff didn't. The plaintiff had the right of way."
It’s the fact that it’s ILLEGAL to drive without insurance. If he had followed the law, he wouldn’t have been driving and the accident wouldn’t have happened.
@@AminaBeans205 That is true but they do not care. I work in a personal injury law firm that does car accidents. I have seen so many cases with one or more parties don't have insurance. Our clients are mostly screwed if the person that hits them don't have insurance.
@@AminaBeans205 exactly my point
Everyone always says "they didn't know". Are they for real? Insurance hounds the heck out of you for payment with explicit explanation that coverage will cease. 😂
Loving the weekend posts!
" he thinks this is a cocktail hour " 🍹🤣
Things JJ neither likes nor tolerates
* people who drive without insurance
* scammers
* people who abuse disability
* able bodied ppl who don’t work
* squatters
* litigants / witnesses who shout out.
* fibbers
* litigants who show up unprepared
She also does not like when someone files a false restraining order against someone, and does not like when a parent (especially females) tries to restrict the other parent from seeing their children.
And those (mothers and fathers) that don’t pay child support.
* people who drink the water😆
2:18 The plaintiff's witness enjoying the circus.
the guy his car is a total loss and he receives only 250 ??? That is ridiculous
its too much. that dop3y caused the crash
@@kaiserschnitselsryou must be related to Chris and/or the defendant or are the goofy I D I O T who never has insurance 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I agree. As the owner of an older paid off car in great condition, if someone hits me, their fault I am skrood. My truck is a 93, runs like a dream, clean, paid off, the city values it at just over $500 For registration purposes. I would have to put myself in debt for years for a new car if I had it wrecked
@@radolfkalis4041Lol that’s not how it works. You pay $1000 for a vehicle and restore it to something totally different you would have receipts for it and you can get it appraised or have it estimated. Since your only car value is $500 you would only get what you paid and if you put any money to it bring it to court and they will consider it as long as an accident was totally not your fault.
JJ said "don't mention classic to me" In all the years I've been watching her, I have NEVER EVER seen her award a decent amount for a classic car. She has the same opinion of them, as she has with Pit Bulls. She won't tolerate either.
Damn- $250 .. that doesn’t get you much. Maybe an old scooter 😂
If he bought a used car for $1000 and kept driving it for several years, the car was worth that much at the time of the accident.
GO BYRD!
“Can I say something?”
No 🗣️ 😂😂
JJ has been snappy these last few episodes and I’m here for it 😂 can’t stop giggling 🤭
The moment I saw him pointing to his vehicle, I knew he had lost😂😂!
Me as well. I thought, stop sign? YOUR fault.
No insurance, no driving. This guy is really something.
The lack of accountability is frightening
A video on Sunday?!. OH JOY!!😂
'I'm saying, judgment for the plaintiff....' 😆
I laughed when I heard the guy works for a law firm and said he can’t say which one. Probably it was because the law firm didn’t want their name associated with this dumb case. They knew he was in the wrong driving without insurance.
How hard is it for someone to grasp the simple fact that you don't drive a car without insurance, period 🙄
$250 judgement is crazy. Why was that the ruling?
"That is irrelevant". LOL. They don't care about the law at all, even when facing a judge.
Ever notice how everyone who causes accidents magically doesn’t have insurance
Does seem to be a theme.
Byrd, "You see that door? That's the one".
I guess once you've seen enough drama, you get desensitized😂
Byrd really is always such a kind gentleman.
He has a lot of class, that man. He mentors kids on the side. A really good guy. The posts where the dopey people keep saying Judge Judy threw him under the bus, just shows how little some people understand. It takes more than 15 minutes to produce a show. This is the one she had planned all along. Byrd is smooth and a real class act.
That dude works in a law office but kept saying "The insurance has nothing to do with this." My guy is ILLEGAL to drive without insurance. If your car has no insurance, you shouldn't be driving it. Period. So stubborn
"you see that door....that the one"🤣😂
As she said many many times, you have to come to court with clean hands. He was actively breaking the law while driving without proper insurance before any accident occurred.
How on earth can you work in a Law Office and not understand you are at fault?
If insurance was irrelevant then nobody would have it.
Thanks for the Sunday upload!
“Chris. Chris. Chris. CHris. CHRis. I don’t, CHRIS”
I almost choked on my soda.
Moral: Don't drive without insurance LMAO..
Never tell JJ that you don't have insurance or are on welfare and don't work or it's an insta-loss
@joelb1299-and never tell her you’re on disability either! And whatever you do, don’t tell her you used your welfare money to buy presents or go on vacation!
Moreover than that
It ain't so much admitting is the problem
It's if to dance round with glib or equivocal answers about any of her inquiry if you confess right when she puts the question to ya I've seen people who are honest about their need for welfare and stuff get what they wanted in court if you got something that you know you're not as proud of yourself this time cuz you had to take help or whatever from the government own up to it right away and then she's going to be merciful it's going to be because of a she knows you're telling the truth and be that when you answer and you're telling the truth she knows you ain't trying to patski around and give her a bunch of hoodwink and kind of answer
@@WeAreNotAmused she really frowns upon ppl who loan money to others using their welfare money. Nor does she approve of fathers waiting for a court date before sending support money.
Since it is illegal to drive without a insurance in most states, that's all she wrote.
You are spot on. Lying to a judge is definitely a NO NO.@@WeAreNotAmused
Thank you for the professional, clear recorded screen contribution of care to your viewers. Hopefully the others who do not follow your care for the viewers will take heed to your hard work.
I Googled the name of the defendant's witness (2:38) and... yikes. Not exactly someone I'd want vouching for me in a court of law.
Yikes! You’re not kidding.
When they say No insurance you know they gona lose 😂
lmfao when will people learn to NOT argue with Judge Judy??? that it will not end well for them
I'm loving these token Sunday uploads.. helps with my usual Sunday judge Judy withdrawals! 😅
that was too funny 🤣🤣🤣
The defendent: I know what stop 🛑 signs are for.
Well apparently you didn't that day😂
Chris was on a roll 😂😂😂🤦🏽♀️
All that embarrassment for $250…LOL nice 😂
$250? gee that's all? oh well, better than nothing I suppose. Guy had right of way....end of story. I can't believe the defendant pushed so hard when he was wrong on both issues....no insurance and HE had the stop sign.
He shouldn't have driven without insurance and he shouldn't have gone through a stop sign. Period. NEVER drive without insurance. Someone who runs a law office should know that.
Plaintiff had insurance, defendant didn't. Defendant had a stop sign, plaintiff didn't. Nice knowing you, defendant.
What kind of work do you do Mr. Stoffel..... I eat for a living.🤣😂
Episode on a Sunday? We’re spoiled 😻
"I'm saying: judgement for the plaintiff." 😂
Talk over JJ and argue with JJ = you see the door.
Man it's like every jew that I've met in my whole entire life has won an argument .
The ridiculous Troy Stoffel trying to tell JJ that his having no car insurance had nothing to do with it sure got shut down quickly! LOL And HE worked in a law office?? LMAOO What a fool!
No matter what the plaintiff had the right of way and you had no insurance, doubly wrong.
It's not irrelevant. If you do not understand that you CANNOT drive without insurance, you shouldn't be driving. Make better choices.
Defendant: I won’t be in for a few days. I need to go on Judge Judy.
Employer: for what?
Defendant: a car accident while I was driving without insurance.
Employer: …..DO NOT MENTION OUR NAME!!!!!
Defendant has been spending too much time around lawyers 😂 thinks he can talk over Judge Judy. As if !!
Bad lawyers. No really good lawyer would have him on the payroll. I worked for lots of attorneys and this guy is no credit to anyone. Just and arrogant idiot who actually thinks he can argue with the JUDGE! No courtroom would allow that, but JJ knows just what to do.
The point is: If you get into an accident while you are uninsured, you should not be on the road to begin with, you ARE the problem and AT FAULT.
You should not have even been on the road to begin with
One of my NEW ALL TIME FAVORITE “Put him outs” 😂😂
HAPPY SUNDAY JJ CREW❤