This is a really good question! It kind of depends on the rest of the scenario. For example, if the scenario said someone if forging a signature for their own gain (like transferring someone’s property to their name) you could bring up the principle of justice. Hope this helps!
I found I wasn’t able to type a completely comprehensive answer such as the one you gave while answering the other 2 questions. I type at 90 WPM and can afford about 3 sentences per question. What is your advice?
I am confused... You mention to take a stance and be firm. However, I read BeMo's book and they suggest that you do not take a stance and only suggest possible actions because we do not know for a fact that he cheated. I thought that it was beyter to be firm but give a flexible answer by showing different outcomes. Is that right?
You would say right off the bat that you’d gather more information to begin with (in this scenario, you would check to see if they actually cheated). Then you mention “if else” statements based on different scenarios. At the end, you would want to take a stance and be firm based on what you think is right.
Link to our NEW Casper worksheets (LIMITED): www.etsy.com/shop/MedBoysOfficialStore?ref=search_shop_redirect
Great info! I can vouch that this method works
Thank you for your support!
How would i approach my friend midtest without being implicated in cheating myself? You cant just talk to your peers while testing.
Well explained. Thanks boys!!
Quality Content Right Here !
Thanks! We have a few other videos on CASPER, be sure to check them out! - Nimit
great tips, thanks guys
what if there was a scenario about forging a signature, what principle can i mention in my answer?
also, i love this video!
This is a really good question! It kind of depends on the rest of the scenario. For example, if the scenario said someone if forging a signature for their own gain (like transferring someone’s property to their name) you could bring up the principle of justice. Hope this helps!
How can you write that much for 1 question. Is there enough time for that
You can always change the structure depending on your WPM!
My best is 3 lines per question :(
I found I wasn’t able to type a completely comprehensive answer such as the one you gave while answering the other 2 questions. I type at 90 WPM and can afford about 3 sentences per question. What is your advice?
Can you talk about both sides at the same time or you need to choose to be on just one side
Hey! Can you give any advice on how to answer personal questions on the casper exam?
Make sure you include an experience and focus on what you learned, not on what happened.
do you think a 3rd quartile score is acceptable?
It really depends on where you’re applying
I am confused... You mention to take a stance and be firm. However, I read BeMo's book and they suggest that you do not take a stance and only suggest possible actions because we do not know for a fact that he cheated. I thought that it was beyter to be firm but give a flexible answer by showing different outcomes. Is that right?
You would say right off the bat that you’d gather more information to begin with (in this scenario, you would check to see if they actually cheated). Then you mention “if else” statements based on different scenarios. At the end, you would want to take a stance and be firm based on what you think is right.