Why was Nasa's Apollo 13 mission flawed from the start? - 13 Minutes to the Moon, Season 2 Episode 1

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 мар 2020
  • “Houston, we’ve had a problem.” To ignite catastrophe would take just the flick of a single switch. Why Nasa’s third bid to land on the Moon was flawed from the start.
    Subscribe - / bbcworldservice
    Watch more videos of Apollo missions to the Moon here: • Apollo missions to the...
    Listen to 13 Minutes to the Moon podcast here: www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w13x...
    Website: www.bbc.co.uk/worldserviceradio
    Twitter: / bbcworldservice
    Facebook: / bbcworldservice
    #13MinutestotheMoon
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 17

  • @mikecobb2466
    @mikecobb2466 Год назад +5

    This is the best podcast I have ever listened to, fantastic content editing, professional commentary and amazingly haunting musical score, we’ll done BBC

    • @AndrewBlacker-wr2ve
      @AndrewBlacker-wr2ve Год назад +1

      "Haunting?"
      That's overly dramatic.
      Try...
      Dramatic
      Ominous
      Melancholy
      On the other hand, "amazing" is grossly exaggerating and misused so for simpletons, "haunting" seems like the only word applicable.
      Build your vocabulary.

  • @Really658
    @Really658 18 дней назад

    I was a fan back then, bothers me when younger generation thinks it's fake.
    Also congratulations to the film producer's, top notch production!
    Obscure clips I've never heard before.

  • @stymiedagain
    @stymiedagain 4 года назад +6

    Wonderful podcast

  • @pjimmbojimmbo1990
    @pjimmbojimmbo1990 11 дней назад

    I remember this flight, I was 10 yrs old and really followed the Moon Flights

  • @jerrysneidjer2633
    @jerrysneidjer2633 2 года назад +1

    13min to the moon a wonderful podcasts serie! Thank you to the BBC'S team which prepared this!

  • @danielhorner1921
    @danielhorner1921 5 месяцев назад +1

    Jim Lovell was a really cool, laid back Astronaut. He was christened the nickname “Shaky” by his pal and fellow Astronaut Pete Conrad just as a joke to wind him up- Everyone knew Jim Lovell was highly regarded.

  • @literallyshaking8019
    @literallyshaking8019 Год назад +1

    I wish I got the chance to meet Jim Lovell. He seems like such a genuine guy, and a real ball-buster.

  • @benjaminhanke79
    @benjaminhanke79 2 года назад +2

    Question to Kevin Fong:
    Do you read audiobooks? This is awesome!

  • @BBCWorldService
    @BBCWorldService  3 года назад +1

    Watch Season 2 of 13 minutes to the Moon here: ruclips.net/p/PLz_B0PFGIn4daEaUX-8ZJHv40rGAINzFy

  • @kdlofty
    @kdlofty Год назад

    Ultimately yes, but they just didn't know.

  • @erichansen3641
    @erichansen3641 11 месяцев назад

    The truth about Apollo 13 is that from the very beginning the mission was to crash the spacecraft into the surface of the moon to record seismic readings to determine if the moon was actually a hollowed out artificial satellite or spacecraft put in orbit about the earth at the time the earth was terraformed to support life. On a previous mission, seismic instruments were left on the moon for Apollo 13 to later crash the spacecraft into the moon close by those instruments. The moon rang like a gong for hours.

    • @nyanbinary1717
      @nyanbinary1717 11 месяцев назад +1

      Uh huh.

    • @AndrewBlacker-wr2ve
      @AndrewBlacker-wr2ve 9 месяцев назад

      I know that whenever a singular entity claims to know "the truth," they're actually a mental patient spewing conspiracy theories.
      Turns out, they never prove the validity nor the source of the theories.
      Never.
      Ever.
      One last detail... Apollo 13, the command module nor the lunar module didn't crash into the moon to ring like a gong for hours.
      ONE BIG LIE!

    • @leighlowe1069
      @leighlowe1069 6 месяцев назад +1

      Right..

    • @codymoe4986
      @codymoe4986 17 дней назад

      The truth?? While it is true that NASA crashed the upper stages of later Apollo missions, into the Moon to record seismic events, it most certainly didn't include the command module or the lunar lander, AKA "the spacecraft"...
      I would appear that your vagueness has already confused 2 people...might want to clear this one up...