Solutions to Navier-Stokes: Poiseuille and Couette Flow

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 авг 2024
  • MEC516/BME516 Fluid Mechanics, Chapter 4 Differential Relations for Fluid Flow, Part 5: Two exact solutions to the incompressible continuity and Navier-Stokes equations. One solution is for laminar steady flow between fixed parallel plates, where the flow is driven by a pressure gradient (Poiseuille Flow). The other solution is for laminar steady flow between parallel plates where the flow is driven only by the motion of the upper plate (Couette Flow).
    All of the videos in this Introductory Fluid Mechanics course, sample exams (with solutions), and a copy (pdf) of this presentation can be downloaded at:
    www.drdavidnayl...
    Course Textbook: F.M. White and H. Xue, Fluid Mechanics, 9th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2021.
    #fluidmechanics #fluiddynamics

Комментарии • 58

  • @FluidMatters
    @FluidMatters  Год назад +9

    All the videos (and pdf downloads) for this introductory Fluid Mechanics course are available at: www.drdavidnaylor.net/

  • @vor6126
    @vor6126 11 месяцев назад +11

    this video alongside your excellent commentary is absolutely a gem to Mechanical Engineering education. much Love

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  11 месяцев назад

      Glad to hear you found this helpful. Bes of luck with your studies,

    • @DictiusTeNecare
      @DictiusTeNecare Месяц назад

      Oh yes, i have to say the same. Tomorrow i will write the fluid mechanics 1 exam, and this video is a really good explanation to improve my formula collection and my knowledge 🙂 Thank you!

  • @abdofast5
    @abdofast5 3 года назад +15

    Sir This is absolutely incredible! You make an excellent relation between differential equations and the course material. I'm hoping you make a fluid dynamics course in its entirety. Thank you so much!

  • @majroi
    @majroi 3 месяца назад +1

    Greetings from Turkey, this material helped me a lot. Thanks professor.

  • @batbayarbatsukh6393
    @batbayarbatsukh6393 4 месяца назад +1

    Greetings from Mongolia. Thanks for the clear explanation. Тhis helped me a lot
    I wish you good health.

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  4 месяца назад

      Mongolia! Hope to visit one day. Glad to hear the video was helpful.

  • @StressedHades37
    @StressedHades37 3 года назад +7

    Thanks for the explanation. That was easier to understand than my textbook!

  • @portreemathstutor
    @portreemathstutor 5 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you so much for these videos. They make my course much easier.

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  5 месяцев назад

      Thanks for the nice comments. Best of luck with your studies.

  • @baaa-ej7xj
    @baaa-ej7xj 2 месяца назад +1

    He saved my final exam😭😭😭

  • @masoudadli108
    @masoudadli108 4 месяца назад +1

    the best of the best,, you make life easy..thanks from Sudan Africa

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  4 месяца назад

      Thanks for the kind words. Glad to hear the videos are helpful.

  • @vidurapaathukkalam..8744
    @vidurapaathukkalam..8744 2 года назад +1

    God gave me the opportunity to see ur video..thank god..thank u for ur explanation..i really Adore 🥰

  • @RGCAD
    @RGCAD 2 месяца назад

    Great stuff, for the last problem i see we have our origin placed midway between the plates, I would therefore expect the y at the bottom to be y = -h

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  2 месяца назад

      Agree. The axis in the graphic (that I stole from the book publisher) is in the wrong place. But I think it's totally clear in the presentation that y=0 is at the bottom. At some point, a long time ago, I fixed it in the pdf download.

  • @PsychicJaguar19
    @PsychicJaguar19 2 года назад +2

    This is very much appreciated, very clear and concise explanation.

  • @soso-zz9qf
    @soso-zz9qf 5 месяцев назад +1

    Wow BLESS YOU I was about to give up

  • @splendidteaching
    @splendidteaching 2 года назад +1

    Really like your videos. Will just point out that slide at 20:11 should say "linear" instead of "parabolic" cor Couette flow. Although you do correct it about 10 seconds later.

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  2 года назад +1

      Yeh, Sorry. These videos are recorded in one "session" without a script. So, misspeaking is going to happen now and again.

  • @requiem-ph5xx
    @requiem-ph5xx Год назад +2

    great vid broski

  • @user-safaa334
    @user-safaa334 3 года назад +2

    thank you so much for your excellent explain

  • @meraihianouar9022
    @meraihianouar9022 2 года назад +1

    Im so grateful nd thankful to u sir, very useful this vidéo

  • @specter1001
    @specter1001 2 года назад +1

    incredibly helpful

  • @javijavi6166
    @javijavi6166 2 года назад +1

    Sir thankyou for uploading this, can we have a video of generalized couette flow?

  • @ThePerks.
    @ThePerks. 7 месяцев назад

    Outstanding

  • @ahmedmokkedem7525
    @ahmedmokkedem7525 3 года назад +1

    Thanks so much sir

  • @Frostbyte-Game-Studio
    @Frostbyte-Game-Studio 2 года назад

    good sir thank you for your video, helped out a lot

  • @francisbacor3214
    @francisbacor3214 2 года назад +1

    Why is d2u/dy2 not cancelled in one dimensional flow? Isnt the flow only in the x-direction
    Your help is highly appreciated

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  2 года назад +1

      "u" IS the x-component of velocity, which is not zero, except at the wall. Thus, d^2u/dy^2 is the curvature of the u-component of velocity, which is certainly no zero for Poiseuille flow. If you don't get this, review your basic calculus of the meanings of derivatives.

  • @luisenriquejaracieza6498
    @luisenriquejaracieza6498 2 года назад

    Thank you so much, sir.

  • @user-qy7gg6hg5b
    @user-qy7gg6hg5b 2 года назад

    Thank you!

  • @jeanbedessounda3571
    @jeanbedessounda3571 2 года назад

    can you show an example of a case where the top plate is fixed and the pressure gradient is moving the bottom plate please

    • @snehajain4334
      @snehajain4334 2 года назад

      Just reverse the boundary conditions., With appropriate signs

  • @alexklaver9936
    @alexklaver9936 2 года назад +1

    Your videos are so helpful! What happened to dynamic viscosity in the Couette flow example around 17:53 of the video?

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  2 года назад +2

      The assumption is that dynamic viscosity is constant, which is true for a Newtonian, isothermal flow. So, you can divide both sides by dynamic viscosity, and it goes away. This tells you that the form of velocity profile does not depend on the fluid viscosity for Couette flow.

    • @alexklaver9936
      @alexklaver9936 2 года назад

      @@FluidMatters thank you! I should have picked Ryerson. You have a real gift for explaining.

  • @SumanthPhaniVarmaPenmetcha
    @SumanthPhaniVarmaPenmetcha 10 месяцев назад

    At 15:00 is the volumetric flow rate, Q= Vdot/w(width?)

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  10 месяцев назад

      No. The flow rate per unit depth (into the page) is Q=V_avg*A=V_avg*2h, where 2h is the flow cross sectional area per unit depth into the page.

    • @SumanthPhaniVarmaPenmetcha
      @SumanthPhaniVarmaPenmetcha 10 месяцев назад

      The units are still the same as Q/w right? m^2/sec?@@FluidMatters

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  10 месяцев назад

      @@SumanthPhaniVarmaPenmetcha Yes. The units are flow rate (m^3/s) per unit depth (m). So, m^3/(s m)=m^2/s. That should make complete sense, if you think about it.

  • @nzearimo
    @nzearimo Год назад

    If the distance apart is 2H, why do you use h for your boundary condition instead of 2h at upper wall?

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  Год назад

      The coordinate system is in the middle of the channel . Wall are y= +h, - h.

    • @nzearimo
      @nzearimo Год назад

      @@FluidMatters Yes that,why -h for a BC, instead of zero? How does -h and h sum up to '2H'?

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  Год назад

      @@nzearimo I don't think I use 2H in the problem, I use 2h. All I can say is: Look at the problem diagram more closely. Deta_y=h-(-h)=2h. I cannot help you beyond this.

  • @sajadadnan9555
    @sajadadnan9555 3 года назад

    What are the limitations of annalytic solution of fluid flow equations ?

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  3 года назад +1

      For this to be an exact solution the flow has to be isothermal because the fluid properties (that vary with temperature ) are assumed to be constant. Also, flow must be laminar (and incompressible). So, Reynolds number must be ~

  • @mrsengineering3663
    @mrsengineering3663 2 года назад

    Pleas sir ...I want the reference for this subject ...thanks for you

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  2 года назад +1

      It is in the video description: Course Textbook: F.M. White and H. Xue, Fluid Mechanics, 9th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2021.

  • @user-xz7xt5cl1m
    @user-xz7xt5cl1m 2 года назад

    Sir What if we do not neglect the gravity effect (acceleration g for - y direction)? Does the calculation change?

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  2 года назад +1

      If you include g in the y-direction you get a hydrostatic pressure gradient in the y-direction, but this has no influence on the flow (in the x-direction).

    • @user-xz7xt5cl1m
      @user-xz7xt5cl1m 2 года назад

      @@FluidMatters Thank you so much!

  • @DrDerivative
    @DrDerivative 9 месяцев назад +1

    🐐🐐🐐🐐🐐🐐🐐🐐 You sir are the GOAT.

  • @abdulhakeemshehu3559
    @abdulhakeemshehu3559 Год назад +1

    Thank you sir

    • @FluidMatters
      @FluidMatters  Год назад +1

      Glad to hear the video was helpful. Good luck with your studies.