WWI Rotary Engine

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 окт 2024

Комментарии • 86

  • @JWSmythe
    @JWSmythe 2 года назад +171

    It's crazy that those even work. I can't imagine the design meeting, where someone said "we could just have the cylinders spin, instead of the crankshaft." And they all agreed on it! :)

    • @AnisJabnouni-ln6og
      @AnisJabnouni-ln6og Год назад +1

      hhhhh

    • @vipertwenty249
      @vipertwenty249 Год назад +19

      Forced air cooling - much more effective at the very low flight speeds of that time, especially with only castor oil as a lubricant.

    • @kurtvonfricken6829
      @kurtvonfricken6829 Год назад +9

      @@vipertwenty249
      The metals available at the time forced this. It looks funny now but back then 1910-1920 ish it is what worked.

    • @kurtvonfricken6829
      @kurtvonfricken6829 Год назад +6

      @@vipertwenty249
      I read or heard a lecture by a guy that was a mechanic on these things and he said castor oil was the perfect lubricant for these engines. I believe he said they have not been able to find anything better.

    • @vipertwenty249
      @vipertwenty249 Год назад +4

      @@kurtvonfricken6829 That would be so true. We could make a much better lubricant now but back then caster oil was as near perfect as they could hope to get. The only problem - the fine mist from the engine gave pilots diahorrea.

  • @korebeast973
    @korebeast973 Год назад +29

    Truly a marvel of engineering, it is astonishing how amazing those engines were. Especially if you consider that the engine itself is what rotates

  • @xevi2889
    @xevi2889 2 года назад +15

    absolutely mind blowing 😍😍😍😍😍🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

  • @bassbustingman
    @bassbustingman Год назад +3

    love that sound

  • @timmckee2813
    @timmckee2813 Год назад +7

    ...i had a really bad dream...and...someone made it...

  • @ronaldmcdonald8303
    @ronaldmcdonald8303 Год назад +1

    Cool, history is interesting! I love history, especially thins about WWI! This is all a result of the industrial revolution! I've been to history shows before and I hade loads of fun!

  • @jckoibra2662
    @jckoibra2662 6 месяцев назад +5

    Wait a second can someone explain,,, the whole engine and cylinders and everything is rotating not just the propeller?

  • @campbellsteel8598
    @campbellsteel8598 4 года назад +8

    now i know a a rotary engine works for my project less goo

  • @lucareviews9760
    @lucareviews9760 Год назад +15

    Can't believe someone said "lets put that in a rx7

    • @rincam5
      @rincam5 Год назад

      🥸

    • @horsesavy4570
      @horsesavy4570 Год назад +5

      @@rincam5 Totally different kind of (Rotory) ie Wankel Rotory

    • @connorrichardson1470
      @connorrichardson1470 Год назад

      How dumb are you bro

    • @NoName-kq9kl
      @NoName-kq9kl Год назад

      People need to stop incorrectly calling wankel engines, rotary engines.

    • @jayh1734
      @jayh1734 10 месяцев назад

      An rx7 motor is a rotary also known as a wankel after its inventor.
      This engine is actually called a rotational engine

  • @Indarow
    @Indarow 26 дней назад

    Yo, WHAT!?
    I didn’t know the ENTIRE engine rotates on the cams!!!
    That’s NUTS.

    • @fairlanewhip79
      @fairlanewhip79 22 дня назад

      The crankshaft, not the camshaft

    • @Indarow
      @Indarow 22 дня назад

      @@fairlanewhip79 both I’m pretty sure, since the valves are pushrod actuated.

  • @TucsonDude
    @TucsonDude Месяц назад

    Looks like a hell of a heave to get that thing spinning.

  • @Nardage
    @Nardage Год назад +5

    These sound better than the spitfire

    • @mikepxg6406
      @mikepxg6406 8 месяцев назад +1

      Never. Do you have bad hearing or poor speakers.

    • @Nardage
      @Nardage 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@mikepxg6406 LOL they sound good too

  • @LCOfficerUNIT097
    @LCOfficerUNIT097 Год назад +2

    I'm getting "Night Witches" vibes from this.

    • @USAFmuseum
      @USAFmuseum  Год назад

      that was such a great experience in person!

  • @OMG_LoL
    @OMG_LoL Год назад +3

    Interested in carburetor to intake manifold construction

    • @downix
      @downix Год назад +4

      It had neither. It injected the fuel through the crankcase, similar to a two-stroke, and the spinning of the motor is what mixed the air and fuel.

  • @LauriceOzer-b9f
    @LauriceOzer-b9f Месяц назад +1

    Purdy Trace

  • @squirrelsstorys4593
    @squirrelsstorys4593 Год назад +5

    That’s why they worn a scarf to wipe the oil off there goggles

  • @SurreyIris
    @SurreyIris Месяц назад +1

    Hagenes Port

  • @devin3156
    @devin3156 2 месяца назад

    “Radial”

  • @enscroggs
    @enscroggs 10 месяцев назад +1

    Too bad nobody understood how to film this.

    • @USAFmuseum
      @USAFmuseum  10 месяцев назад +1

      I think we have the shutter controls dialed in now.

    • @mikepxg6406
      @mikepxg6406 8 месяцев назад

      "too bad" what does that mean. Speak English.

  • @jayh1734
    @jayh1734 10 месяцев назад

    Not rotary. This is a rotational engine. A rotary is one like in a mazda. It has a rotor. This engine rotates. It has a crankshaft

    • @xerxeskingofking
      @xerxeskingofking 10 месяцев назад +6

      their are more than one type of engine that get called "rotary". the Wankel type engine in the mazda is one type invented in the 1920s but this is another type, and was at the time (ww1) just called a rotary engine, with no distinction.

    • @cr4zyj4ck
      @cr4zyj4ck 9 месяцев назад +6

      This is 100% a rotary engine. It is not a Wankel Rotary Engine, such as the RX7 had, but it *is* a Rotary Engine. It, and the term Rotary Engine, predate the Wankel Rotary by about 15 years or so. These engines were fairly quickly replaced by Radial engines, which look similar, but do not rotate the entire engine around the crankshaft.

    • @jayh1734
      @jayh1734 9 месяцев назад

      @@cr4zyj4ck rotational

    • @mikepxg6406
      @mikepxg6406 8 месяцев назад +3

      Wrong. look at the patents.

  • @hakeshiscarlet525
    @hakeshiscarlet525 Год назад +2

    Just a little correction bud. This is a radial engine, not rotary. Hopes this helps.
    Edit: My statement is ambiguous, but @rescue270 corrected my statement:
    "... correct that is a radial, due to the cylinders mounted radially on the case, but this type rotating radial is known as a rotary engine. Not to be confused with the Wankel rotor engine."
    "All rotary aircraft engines are also radials, due to the radial cylinder arrangement. In fact, the first radials were of the rotary type. In the 1880s this design was first envisaged as a powerplant to be mounted within the wheels of early motorcycles."
    "This is a very confusing subject. All rotaries are radials, but not all radials are rotaries. ..."

    • @pav9632
      @pav9632 Год назад +9

      Incorrect. It is a rotary engine.

    • @zrspangle
      @zrspangle Год назад +3

      Radial has a stationary block with a moving crank. This has a fixed crank and moving block, meaning it is a rotary. Note that this is different from a Wankel rotary, however.

    • @killianjohn4794
      @killianjohn4794 9 месяцев назад +1

      Its proper name is "piston rotary engine"...its not a radial engine!

    • @mikepxg6406
      @mikepxg6406 8 месяцев назад +1

      No it's aa rotary engine. Engage brain before touching keyboard.......

    • @rescue270
      @rescue270 8 месяцев назад +1

      You are correct that is a radial, due to the cylinders mounted radially on the case, but this type rotating radial is known as a rotary engine. Not to be confused with the Wankel rotor engine.

  • @potat1011
    @potat1011 2 года назад

    Radial, not rotary

    • @klwarhouse
      @klwarhouse 2 года назад +11

      Lol, it's a Rotary. Radial is completely different. Most people today confuse Rotary with Wankels.

    • @jm10014
      @jm10014 Год назад +1

      This was the original rotary engine.

    • @stephen4036
      @stephen4036 Год назад +1

      @@thecodeofreality ya most people make that mistake because of the failed mazda enging they call rotary. It's common mistake made by uploaders apparently also, cause when i typed rotary engine, i got many videos of Wankel engines in cars lol

    • @horsesavy4570
      @horsesavy4570 Год назад +1

      No Radials have a Stationary Engine Block and Cylinders (Pratt & Whitney, Wright and others. Rotary(Not to be Confused with Wankel's) had a stationary Crankshaft and the Engine itself Turned. Primarily WWI Aircraft's used them. Companies like Humber, Le Rhone Produced them.

    • @timothyhouse1622
      @timothyhouse1622 Год назад +1

      Wow, to be so sure of yourself to put out something so completely WRONG. Amazing.