By changing the pitch very quickly (at 999hz) the impression of in-tune notes and noise similar to the vic-20’s can be synthesized. Even though 6-bit pitch sounds better than the Atari 2600’s 5-bit pitch generation, the Atari 2600 has an option for a low-pitched and a high -pitched square wave, and these 2 square waves have pitches that are less spread out. In other words, the Atari 2600’s square wave has pitches that are closer together, and, as a result, more in-pitch. (Even if they still sound terrible)
Now i want to hear this on a real PV-1000. Im guessing your running this on an emulator as the PV-1000 and in-turn the NEC D65010G031 are quite rare bit of kit.
A true technological miracle in such a limited chip
Nice Casio PV-1000 cover of the song!😄🤩😎👌
Now that i check this again, the intro resembles the hummer variant of new junk city
Surprisingly in tune for a 6-bit pitch resolution.
I've never heard a soundchip screaming for mercy before. very nice cover though :)
Damn that is quite the statement FRFR
the diabeetus will now start gaining attention
spread the word
The Blender Fiddler
What's that soundchip
The 6-bit crappy sound chip used in the Casio PV-1000
@@theblenderfiddler4434 is it a wavetable chip?
@@ssg-eggunner nahhhh
It's a 1-bit volume, three channel, 6-bit pitch accurate square generator
By changing the pitch very quickly (at 999hz) the impression of in-tune notes and noise similar to the vic-20’s can be synthesized.
Even though 6-bit pitch sounds better than the Atari 2600’s 5-bit pitch generation, the Atari 2600 has an option for a low-pitched and a high -pitched square wave, and these 2 square waves have pitches that are less spread out.
In other words, the Atari 2600’s square wave has pitches that are closer together, and, as a result, more in-pitch. (Even if they still sound terrible)
@@doopdeeso this tune is overclocked?
Now i want to hear this on a real PV-1000.
Im guessing your running this on an emulator as the PV-1000 and in-turn the NEC D65010G031 are quite rare bit of kit.
Yes lol