The other top ten players said they were most afraid of Federer and Nadal out of the big three, because Federer just takes the racquet out of your hands, and Nadal runs you into the ground. They said, “at least Djokovic lets you play”.
nah most ruthless was nadal on clay handing out bagels to top 5/10 players. Monte Carlo 2010 is an example (fewest games dropped on a masters 1000 title)
@@NonstopTennisYT it’s Roger in Basel. This was everyone that faced him with an exception of a handful of players. Again, this was not a match that needed this much of a hype title.
I wouldnt say this is ruthless, some of fed backhand is not deep enough plus he play quite safely compared to when he played nadal in miami and indian wells or wawrinka in one of these final.
@@MikeAG333 6-1 6-3 is most ruthless? and did i talk about score? or did i say "play quite safely" and "backhand not deep"? which one did you not comprehend?
@@haikalizzuddin4033 Obviously English isn't your first language. And obviously manners are a weakness of yours too.........along with punctuation. "Ruthlessnes" does not imply perfection.
@@MikeAG333 getting personal are we? Talking about manners from someone who dont have manners themselves. Haha. Get a life. Stick to the topic, fed have won at least 30% with score 63 63 or lower. So which one is "most" you so called 'english 1st language speaker'?
Fedsqaush had lots of success with b players and b tournaments where he won 50% of his titles on the 250/500 circuit..When it came to nadal/djoki over is career he only won 33% of their GS matches which includes GS finals!! 33% is complete failure!! Fed couldn't even beat nadal once at french and lossed on his supposed best surface grass 3 times in a row to djoki Wimbledon finals.. Fed has a weak backhand, was weak mentally and didn't have tennis smarts. But FEDsqaush did sell lot so running shoes!!
Nobody could beat Federer when playing his best. Just incredible!
The other top ten players said they were most afraid of Federer and Nadal out of the big three, because Federer just takes the racquet out of your hands, and Nadal runs you into the ground. They said, “at least Djokovic lets you play”.
Ruthless is what Roger has done to Roddick.
A 21 to 3 h2h is insane. Just goes to show how is undeniably the best player to get touch a racquet.
Na, what he did to James Blake, yikes, he did him dirty... 🙂
😂 Roger was the most elegant bully on the court. Incredible skill.
Quel bonheur de revoir notre Roger ❤🇨🇭❤🇨🇭
I miss that guy.
What he did with david ferrer is insane, he never lost to him😂😂
17-0 h2h if i recall correctly?
What about Davydanko?
kohlschreiber, youzhny
Absolutely luv me some Federer ❤❤❤❤
This explains Tiafoe’s multiple body shots at Federer in his retirement doubles game. Utter disgrace.
Haha
Hello. Do you have the match that Federer played against Manarino from Basel 2017? Thanks.
Wouldnt call this ruthless. Try Federer - James Blake at Shanghai Open around 2006.
You can’t hit a short ball to Fed. The point will be over.
👏👏👏
nah most ruthless was nadal on clay handing out bagels to top 5/10 players. Monte Carlo 2010 is an example (fewest games dropped on a masters 1000 title)
Carmine Ports
This was a regular ole Roger Federer in Basel match……Why the dramatic title name?!?!!
The score was respectable and the opponent kept battling.
ruthless 🥶🥶
@@NonstopTennisYT it’s Roger in Basel. This was everyone that faced him with an exception of a handful of players. Again, this was not a match that needed this much of a hype title.
Ruthless.
Enid Mount
Rice Knoll
I wouldnt say this is ruthless, some of fed backhand is not deep enough plus he play quite safely compared to when he played nadal in miami and indian wells or wawrinka in one of these final.
Err...........you didn't happen to notice the score, did you?
@@MikeAG333 6-1 6-3 is most ruthless? and did i talk about score? or did i say "play quite safely" and "backhand not deep"? which one did you not comprehend?
@@haikalizzuddin4033 Obviously English isn't your first language. And obviously manners are a weakness of yours too.........along with punctuation. "Ruthlessnes" does not imply perfection.
@@MikeAG333 getting personal are we? Talking about manners from someone who dont have manners themselves. Haha. Get a life.
Stick to the topic, fed have won at least 30% with score 63 63 or lower. So which one is "most" you so called 'english 1st language speaker'?
Let's be Honest folks. Ruthless is Nadal on Clay in his Prime. Nothing beats it in statistics lol look it up baby 😇😇😇😇😇😇
Fedsqaush had lots of success with b players and b tournaments where he won 50% of his titles on the 250/500 circuit..When it came to nadal/djoki over is career he only won 33% of their GS matches which includes GS finals!! 33% is complete failure!! Fed couldn't even beat nadal once at french and lossed on his supposed best surface grass 3 times in a row to djoki Wimbledon finals.. Fed has a weak backhand, was weak mentally and didn't have tennis smarts. But FEDsqaush did sell lot so running shoes!!
Wait you actually believe your opinion matters? lol... the internet..
@@pac0re exactly, just like someone posting these video who cares!! but someone needs to educate the fed's pageantry crowds