To clarify, The fishermen who guided the pirates to the Icelandic island were English. No love was lost between the English and the Vikings AKA, Danes, Norse, and Swedes which Iceland was part of. The Vikings had raided the English islands for many years and were hated by some English. Just another example of how as human beings we are all ancestors of slaves and conquerors both, none of our collective histories is pure and innocent.
@@steve-iw2bg I believe that is putting to fine a point on the issue of the Norse. Anglo-Saxons hated the Norse/Norman's much longer than the official Norman reign. Through a process of assimilation these feelings went away but was very palpable for years and years.
The human race as a whole just needs to say “Yeah, slavery in any form is evil” and move on. Maybe that would motivate us to actually do something about slave conditions in the modern world. They do still exist.
This reminds me of all my ancestors journals. Described the Muslims capturing my family attacking and killing them. Whatever they say is a lie they never treated us good they beat them horribly. And I’m lucky to even be here that’s how bad they came after my ancestors.
They killed the husbands and raped the women. If the Christians refused to convert to Islam, the Muslims cut the kid's heads in front of their parents.
It's a common misconception that slavery is exclusive to colonial America. Not a fact, it's been around back to the dawn of time. I'm an etymology nerd. The word slave is derived from 'slavic' the Romans pillaged and enslaved them en masse. My genealogy is Scandinavian. My ancestors were savages. Truth.
Some of your ancestors were savages while others were slaves. It's not that long ago we had kinda an cast system. Oldest son always getting the land and F the rest of the children. My mother have been doing research on our family and there was several that was executed in the late 1890s for theft. Ha en go helg syster lr bror!
@@randomperson9187 That is not true. The only thing that was exclusive to the slaves of America was that it was almost impossible to earn one's freedom unlike an I Otttoman slave.
@@abdibgm5748 A slave's child in Ottoman slavery law could not be enslaved. This is absolutely true. All in all the confusion is about the term slavery being a bit too broad. Comparing American Slavery to Ottoman slavery is an exercise in futility as there were serious differences in the way they were done. For example there was no racial component in Ottoman slavery. If you got caught in war you got caught in war, end of story. Both forms of slavery were absolutely terrible but they were so different in form and implementation that it's odd that one word would describe both.
I am from Austria/Europe - back in the days the austrian empire fought centuries against the turkish invasion. When Vienna our capital were fallen to the turks - Europe would not be christian. My grand grandfather was soldier in the turkish war - so in my thinking the turkish invasion is not far away and it was not nice to get in turkish hands. Love from Austria 🇦🇹
turkish here. so there is a possibility of that your grand grandfather and mine grand fought against each other years ago and now here we are communicating each other through a platform they couldnt ever imagine never. we live in a weird world. may all of their souls rest in peace.
@@ExaelE I believe in communication also - weather culture religion and so on. By the way: As a result of these troubles we got the coffee and a baker in Vienna invented a pastry called „Kipferl“ - in form of the turkish half moon after the first battle from Vienna - We like to eat coffee and Kipferl both together very much - it’s like a tradition 🥰 My son made his master study exam in „The History of the relationship „Hohe Pforte“ I think Babiali in turk and the K.K. Hofkanzlei means the relationship between the government in Istanbul and the government in Vienna over the centuries. A really weird one but they communicated closely. Nobody had ever mentioned this cause and the examinations board was very astonished but also very interested.
I get really annoyed with the Western liberal view of the crusades. They're so dumb that they don't realise Middle Eastern Christians lived in these areas. The crusades was the West trying to "Recapture" Christian lands. These same morons tend to forget Islam's invasion of North Africa, Spain the Balkans and like you say, Byzantium.
@@Spr1ggan87 He did not mean the name of the Empire, but the name of the capital on the Bosphorus. And by the way, the term "Byzantine" was invented by German historians in the 16th and 17th centuries, in order to increase the importance of the Western, German "Holy Roman Empire", and diminish the Eastern Roman Empire, which was called that from 300 and some years AD. until the fall of Constantinople in 1453! The Eastern Roman Empire existed for 1,100 years! There was a Greek-speaking area, but that part of the Roman Empire has always been that. Byzantine never existed, but rather the continuity of the Eastern Roman Empire. The citizens of the so-called "Byzantine Empire" called themselves Romans and their country: "Roman Empire".
As an Icelander, when we learn about this event in school it annoys students, because in the curriculum it follows us learning about the brutality of the viking age and the civil war that reigned here for the first 300 years after christianity took over, cumilating in a time called "Sturlungaöld". Then we fast forward to learn about the weak Christian life that took over and as teenagers we just asked, how could that cool brutal culture fall for soft people who were victimized so easilly? As much as we are a mix of Vikings and their English/Irish slaves we always just identify with the vikings since that is considered the more Epic culture.
hmm.. my guess is because of 'blessed is the meek' and imo it's used to guilt trip people into becoming a follower... plus, vikings were an unstoppable force to be reckoned with; how could you control and bend them to one's will in that state? the vikings *had* to be conquered lest they remain a threat and obstacle to the overlords ''holy'' roman empire and what not...which also hijacked christianity to suit their own needs, hence why the ''meek'' benefits them who are very not meek themselves..>_> ofc, all imo.
Some of the Barbay pirates were European who it was said " had taken the turban or turned Turk" (converted to Islam). They were handy as they knew the lay of the land and could advise where to land before an attack. Most had not actually converted but went through the acceptance of Islam ceremony. Some eventually even returning to their original homes after their pirate days were over. Some even became captains of slaving ships.
Good explanation. At 14:20 mark she said it that these "pirates" from Christian countries were enslaved also, just trying to get out alive and richer...
Algers is present day Algeria. These were the Barbary Pirates. I don’t know if you saw it, but at the end it said he was reunited with his wife 10 years later.
@Knight what a bullshit... give me only one little evidences where did you get this shit from? If turk existed only out from the Turkistan tribes near Rusland and those tribes existed before Islam came to them how can you come with this shit stop this lies you have got a lot of beer i think our some other drugs as we know from your ancestors always liying!!!!!
Turk, Saracen, Muslim, Arab, Persian, Barbarian all describes the slavers. They were from Algeria in Northern Africa. The coast of Northern African is known as the Barbary Coast, where Romans named them Barbarians. This was still a problem even after the U.S. was founded. The U.S. Navy was actually created to fight the pirates of the Barbary Coast.
I agree people have romanticised pirates who were really horrible people whether independent or working as mercenaries for different powers. The Somali pirates (and some in East Asia I believe) are still very much like that. I just watched your reaction to the Barbary Pirates - The Barbary Pirates were like the extension to the Arab Slave Trade aka the Trans Saharan Slave Trade. When you look into the Arab Slave Trade in Africa you can see that they were using slavery to force people, or terrify people, into Islam. When African peoples did become Muslims, they were themselves expected to give tribute to the Arab overlords and part of this was always more African Slaves. So the African people went from being taken as slaves - to being forced into taking part in the slave trade themselves. So you should not be surprised that lback Africans who had been terrified into becoming Muslim would also find themselves aboard Muslim slaving ships anywhere. On land the Ottomans often used black people first in the attacks of the Janissaries - some of their best - but also first used soldiers. This is one reason why so few black descendants of the Muslim slavers survive in Muslim countries today. (The other most probable reason is much worse).
My cousin married into a Turkish family so I learned a little Turkish. Their language used the Arabic alphabet until 1922. The Turkish Language is incompatible with Arabic sounds so there was a high illiteracy rate. When they switched to the Roman Alphabet, their literacy rate soared.
Really you 2 have a channel and you think whites raided the worlds black and brown peoples ???? Ffs . Listen to a few hours of Thomas Sowell wtf are you doing if your not ???? The woman king ya she IS a slaver
@@mafiooato7233 He's not lying, Arabic is not too dissimilar to Japanese- both languages are very symbolic. It makes perfect sense that a form of writing that needs less characters will be quicker- easier to learn. Just like Arabic numerals made more sense than Roman numerals. I know that with Japanese, speaking and writing are two separate disciplines. I know that the Japanese still use guides to correctly write what they mean well into their twenties- maybe longer.
At least some of those Europeans, were previously captured and converted to Islam because they could be freed since Islam said you couldn't enslave another Moslem.
@@TheLordUrban What I meant by what was said, are the descendants of that class of people. Even today warrior class genetics are obvious in genetic memory amongst those people were from that group.
I grew up learning about old world history from my father/ history books programs ect. So I always looked as slavery as a war based prospect... By the time I learned about US slavery I just assumed it was war based... Which it was... Africans going to war with other tribes, enslaving their opponents, and selling them to the English. Don't get me wrong I knew that the concept of racism existed, which could be seen as readily as slavery itself, but I personally never associated the two together as a single unit until my young adult life between the ages of 20 and 30 when everyone seems to care about is black versus white racism. And I am glad for my upbringing, because it allowed me to actually look at history and reality for what it truly is rather than the stitched work mythos that the tribalist utilize today to push their racism derived propaganda, not too dissimilar to the actions of Hitler, or more specifically the Nazi party prior to world war II... Great video and I hope you two keep reacting to such content, because at this point it is only because of people like you that the truth still exists of which will hopefully Open the eyes of the blind, and pull them away from the shadow of ignorance and the voice of tribalism.
The Ottoman Empire was a Turkish empire and they were Muslims. It stretched form the northern territories of Africa into East Europe, up to the Hungarian Kingdom from where they also took slaves. They were fought back and kicked out of the Hungarian Kingdom in the 17th but the Balkans up to Serbia remained occupied until the first world war. The interesting thing is that the occupation of the East European territories, the Balkans by the Ottoman, Turkish, Muslim Empire started right about the time when colonizations by the British Empire and other western European countries began. Rather then helping countries in East Europe to fight back the Ottoman invasion, they were more focused on their selfish interest in finding gold an other resources in Africa and in the new world because that was their main objective.
What's your point? It's the British fualt kuz they let it happen? I happen? I heard it was Brittian was the first nation to end slavery in their country & out to abolish slavery
@@ogbigwhoopyoassnogga4854 My point is there, you just have to learn to interpret, and go to school outside the U.S Yes, it was there fault. No, they were not the first because in other countries there was no slavery.
@@johncasper5052 oh brother slavery been out to human history , the Mongols had slaves, the Chinese, the Turks, the Arabs, africans.. , native Americans had slaves
@@ogbigwhoopyoassnogga4854 Not all Africans, Asians and Europeans had slaves. It cannot be divided into races. It is based on other factors. When I say British, I am talking about those who ran the British Empire and funded those voyages and agendas to their benefit.
@@johncasper5052 now you implying that Asians & a fricans didn't empires, who had slaves? But your only referring to who funded it it & not people who did it? Bring our logic is stupid, you basically only cared who funded it, brobits all bad
The irony is that Turks were used as slaves in the Arab Caliphate. Then they became the masters and enslaved the other nations around them . They were pretty brutal to say the least....
Turk was a general description of people from the Near East and Northern Africa. The dominant religion in those areas in the 1600s and today is Islam. Algeria is in Africa.
regarding the "dwarves" that were common in Alger, I wonder if those could have been pygmies. regarding the belief at the time, that would have been Islam. The ottoman Empire started in the 13th century, Islam was established in the 7th. As for other people knowing where people were to be found, the Vikings were not shy in going around and attacking other European countries. Normandie, in France, is named so because Vikings established themselves there in the 9th century.
kindly do a report on indian natives' slavery too and what is their condition, and how many millions have died because of country possession. You ability to explain and interpret is excellent.
Turks are a people originally from Siberia, specifically from the region around the Altai Mountains. In the early Middle Ages (Dark Ages) they came to Anatolia, and it is believed that they then accepted Islam as a religion (before that they were some kind of shamanist religion like most peoples in Siberia). This story takes place in the 17th century, at a time when the Ottoman Empire was at its peak (it was at its peak in the 16th and 17th centuries), when the Ottoman Turks were largely (for centuries already) Muslims by religion.
When we learn anything to do with history we have to do so with an open mind, for what we see as barbaric today was common place back then all around the world and it only became barbaric to us now because some nation or nations stood up against it and changed it for better or for worse. One thing that we can all agree on is no matter what country we learn about it had its fair share of good and bad and in time maybe people will look back upon our present day learning of the history we leave behind in disgust at things we have done or maybe we will have learned from our own teachings of history and leave things for future people to learn with pride.
1600 Turks Islam. Officially the Ottoman Empire was an Islamic Caliphate ruled by a Sultan, Mehmed V, although it also contained Christians, Jews and other religious minorities.
Yes they hated Christians and still do. The Ottoman empire was dissolved in WW2 but while it existed, non-muslims paid a tax to stay alive, and no religion but islam was recognized. It's something to learn about for current times too.
these stories are common to all cultures that practice(d) slavery. some historians claim that other accounts of slavery in ottoman empire paint a somewhat more benign picture. what happened regardless was awful however there were more opportunities for upward mobility as a slave in the ottoman empire than there was in christian states (spain, france, venice, florence, portugal, malta, etc) who all had their own corsair fleets and did the same thing. There wasfar less hope for the muslim slave to gain freedom than the opposite. the ottomans encouraged education. it's a mixed bag and all can be villified if you look hard enough.
Tribulations. If is extremely sad, but remember Icelandic people were cold blooded pirates in the pass. Call it sins of the father comes back to revisit their sons and daughters. What goes around comes around. Remember to practice evil against others because your offspring will pay for your sins,
I'm pretty sure they were very proficient in avoiding Danger. So if they got caught they probably had no other options. It's freezing f****** cold there imagine being a woman with a couple children where you going to take them? If you don't stay warm you die of hypothermia and take the rest of the house that you and your husband built being burned to the ground I definitely think that these were smart people and if they had a way to get away they would have
You asked," what did these people believe in ? ". They was Muslim. "In the multi-ethnic Ottoman Turkish Empire, Islam was the ideological binding agent. Religious communities belonging to the People of the Book retained their protected status based upon the so-called Millet system (milla means ‘nation’), and had autonomy where internal matters were concerned." If I was ALL POWERFUL and heard my people crying out to me in pain, I would immediately help them. ":this is just my opinion"
@@hasanrızayetişSo? Don’t worry we’re coming after you soon enough don’t worry about a thing we got you. Quid pro quo remember that man because I’m a descendant of the very people your filthy people tried attacking.
@@hasanrızayetiş Oh you have no clue you think just because we’re Christians that you can do whatever you want well hmm 🤔 you have yet to see our war time order from the most high Yahweh for there is no other God but Yah and no one more powerful then the Messiah Christ Yeshua. And when he is with us no one can or will go against us bet that.
@@radicalred474 Firstly i'm an Atheist Turk.. Secondly there is no god and kind of bullshit. Wars win with power. Not fairytales. And we have power. Get it?
Reposting from your other video "Islam gets its religious views from The Quran primarily and the Hadiths secondarily. The Quran is an abrogative text, meaning the most recent writings supercede any previous verses that are contradictor, and Muhammeds final marching orders literally commands his followers to enslave non Muslims. Also according to The Hadiths, particularily the early ones, Muhammed did the following; had sex with Aisha when she was 6, was so commonly covered in stains of semen that Aisha would pick them of with her nails, Muhammed would rant about how white his armpits and body was, made it a death penalty if someone claimed he was black, said the devil would look like a black man, said black slaves were worth a third of white slaves, had red hair which is why many Muslims dye their beard red, married his sons wife and cuckolded him and also compared Ethiopeans to raisins. So there was always classism throughout the world based on skin color as those who worked outside had darker skin and so it was seen as a sign of being a commoner or a peasant/serf/slave etc. but given the time when "White supremacy" begins to become a thing in Europe it could be argued, and fairly easily at that, that Muhammed created the Proto White Supremacy and the original basis of the doctrine. The reason I say this is because it wasn't until Europe started getting genocided, raped and enslaved by Islam for over half a millenia that Europe started to promote White Supremacist doctrine. Europe stalled The Caliphates long enough for The Ottomen Empire to collapse to infighting, the black death and the Golden Horde. If it wasn't for that Europe would have lost and "Europeans" would not exist. In fact, basically none of the cultures would exist either or if they did they would be unrecognizable. I think this, combined with the doctrine that seeped into Europe via cultural osmosis with The Ottomens cause Europeans to gain an inferiority/superiority complex in response. I think some proof of this is that this period of history of when Europe was getting raped and ravaged is barely talked or taught about in school and its usually favorable towards Europeans military might and ignores WHY the Crusades began and erroneously attributes its sole cause to be both "an expansionary and aggressive invasion" and also as "a retaking of Jerusalem" after the fall of the Eastern Roman Empire but they always teach it as though the caliphates just filled the void left by EREs collapse without acknowledging that The Caliphates CAUSED Eastern Rome to collapse. Eastern Rome continued on fairly well for decades after Western Rome fell UNTIL The Caliphates almost completely Genocided, via rape and murder, The Byzantines. Now all that is left of The Byzantines are the people called The Turks and some Armenians who are also still being genocided by Turkey. The West as a whole seems to pay no attention to what happened leading up to The Crusades and Spains "Racist" Reconquista but never mention what happened leading up TO it."
The Turks were Muslim. To understand the attitudes between Christians and Muslims you need to check out a documentary on The Crusades. The Crusades were a series of religious wars initiated, supported, and sometimes directed by the Catholic Church in the medieval period. Essentially it was European Christians vs Muslims from the Ottoman Empire and North Africa. The best known of these Crusades are those to the Holy Land in the period between 1095 and 1291 that were intended to recover Jerusalem and its surrounding area from Islamic rule. Without modern weapons (they used swords, lances, spears, battle axes, maces, crossbows, longbows, and daggers) it is estimated over 3 million men died (although it could be as high as 9 million since records in the East were sketchy and not well recorded).
"initiated by the catholic church".... I hope you are not dismissing the previous islamic ocupation of European territory...as in more than half "christian land" had been taken by islam. lets no pretend the moors/arabs/muslim were about peace and love or live and let live... The first call for a crusade happened in 846 AC, when Arabs sailed up the Tiber and raided St Peter's in Rome. "REconquista" for nothing you know... I'm not saying Crusaders were saints or even that they had only honest and pure intentions, they were trying to conquer as well, and many were sadistic F'ers, ofc...but the fact is the Crusades were a response, Europe did not draw first blood.
@@jasfan8247 and rome at the start wasnt a christian nation, theres a reason why roman myths are simiar to greek myths, its that over time rome became christian. why cause their leader decided it so.
No, he said English fisher man... they were attacking Danish people (an entirely different race from the english... different, language, different heritage, ancestry, and so on).
Who are the English, decended from Danes, anglosaxons and Norwegians. Your very wrong. The English language has more in common with old Norse than any other language.
@@jodawson5268 Are you trolling. Everyone is descended from roughly Middle Eastern/Indian like peoples, out of Africa (somewhere abouts the area where Egypt is now). This is not the point of anything, any more than what you are saying... but even if you offered proof that they became Danish Before they became English, it would not make any difference. You can tell that they share closer common ancestry of course, as do the Celts (Who are actually much closer to "Viking" peoples, genetically, than are English people... in fact, even though both the Scots and Irish are Celts, with common origin in Gaelic language, Mythology, and Culture, as would be the case for all the various "Viking" peoples, but most people wouldn't say they are the same people, especially after all this time, only that they share a common ancestry). So, the fact remains that the English are definitely not so closely related as to be considered the same people, nor for there to be any serious argument to the point... one of the ways you can tell this is the case, no matter how similar they may appear, is that they have a different language (they do, don't know what you're smoking), and therefore diverged long enough ago to develop different forms of communication (they needed interpreters to talk to one another... somebody had to learn the others language, because they did not know it to begin with). This is no different than people pretending that ever African is the same race... they are not (there are over 50 countries in Africa, they have even more languages, because there have been many more than 50 tribes of people in Africa). After you have developed your own independent culture (historically including a different language, but not always... Celtic peoples, "Viking" peoples, Canadians, et cetra), after you have settled into different lands, began to adapt and survive in different way (different foods, climates, and so on), you are no longer the same people (same species, same sure... people no) ... saying otherwise, is no different than blacks claiming they are African, or American whites claiming to be European, this would be ridiculous (just like Hispanic peoples are not Spanish people, and actually are many different people, especially due to various indigenous add mixtures, creating new peoples, despite inheriting the Spanish language) since Americans are mixed peoples, even now in the melting pot never having a chance to settle into one new thing (though we are still a distinct people, due to culture). Any way, the point was, there is no reason to say "English Fishermen" if they were not English, if they were Danish fishermen, he would simply have said fishermen... the distinction was made because it was important (because it described a separate group... not by occupation, but by origin).
@@jodawson5268 Don't get the wrong idea... I'm not saying there is no Danish ancestry among the English. Viking invaded and settled in English lands (I'm pretty sure most people are aware of this by now). What I'm saying to you, is that this incident (which seems to have occurred during those times) would involve English people who were just as likely not to have Danish ancestors (if not more so) than to have them. If you want to argue about modern English people, I'm sure they got much more than danish ancestry... but that is not the conversation. If you are trying to confuse the issue to make a point... we might as well just stop talking about it, because I have no interest in intellectual dishonesty or point making (I'm am only having this conversation because there seems to be some misunderstanding going on and I felt some obligation to mitigate that (however, it is not a strong obligation, so I will not indulge argument for argument sake... it simply does not benefit me in any way to do so). At the end of the day, the story was told in simple language, it was easy to follow, and there should be no misunderstand... or at least, that's the way it came across to me. I really don't understand why any one is reading in to it, beyond what was said, not sure where the interpretation is required... so my original response was just that (for the sake of language and clarity, why are we starting a round of telephone, when it was pretty clear what was being said).
@@jodawson5268The Danes occupied a large section of England for some time, but the modern population show few genetic markers. It seems the Danes and existing Brythonic people did not inter marry much, but the Anglo Saxons did settle and marry and have children with the locals across England. Oxford University did a study, using people who knew that their great grandparents all came from the region they lived in. It shows Danes didnt leave much DNA, but the Saxons did. People in the UK have up to about 40% max Saxon DNA, with the rest being Celtic/Brythonic. Those in North Wales are mostly Brythonic still, and different Celtic groups across Cornwall, Wales, Scotland. People in Cornwall and Dorset, next to each other, show very distinct genetic markers. It's interesting how people moved about and how they lived socially, either seperately or mass integration.
If this video is completely about the Ottoman and Arab treatment of black slaves, yellow are going to be sick to your stomach and probably crying. I was crying watching a video on how the West was the last to have slavery & the first to end it. After Britain ended slavery 30 years before America, their navy was the largest in the world, and they would sit on the eastern side of Africa between Africa and Turkey and they would chase ships down to see if they had slaves and then when America ended slavery, we started helping them.. I don’t even want to go into the detail of what would happen to the slaves on the ships that the Ottomans and Arabs wanted to get off the ship before they got caught by Americans in the British because it’s too sick and heartbreaking but the worst thing that the Turks and Aarons did to their male slaves is that they castrated all the men and they would meet with the female slaves .
I’m from Sudan , formally know. As nubia, the sla&e trade back in the days was not focused on black people it was Islamically abolished gradually ad the reward for Atq Rawaba which means emancipating a slave was so great in Islam that people started letting sla:e go gradually over the years. USA only started stopping the slav:e market less than 100 yrs ago
The first states to join the union (USA) were in 1787. Slavery ended here in all states in 1865. 78 years later as a country. 1865 was one hundred and fifty seven years ago. Also, not every state was a slave state. 1/2 were free & 1/2 were slave states. By 1790, there were 13 small colonies of the USA in a small area of land. It wasn't the entire 50 states as it is today. I'm not condoning it or minimizing it because not one person should ever be enslaved, and I know it's part of our history that will never be erased, and it shouldn't be. I'm only replying because it ended more than 150 years ago in the USA, not less than 100 year ago. Slavery started long before the USA was founded, and it's still going on today in some places in some sort of way. You should look up the Treaty of Tripoli and also the Barbary Wars.
While The Arab Slave Trade was not focused on one specific group based on most leftovers and props and evidences and hook liners it has been shown that most parts treated The Zanj of East Africa as the lowest group of them all compared to other Non Ethnic Arabs yeah.
why do you react to drawings as if they were photographs? those drawings are just an illustration combined with the read narration. who knows when those drawings were created. they may have been drawn at the same time as that documentary was made.
the reason there was blacks among them is becaue the city they came from is my city in Africa but was ruled by the turks because we invited them to protect us
Islam was created around the year 610 CE, after Christianity. Mohammed basically studied Christianity and created a copy of it to end the mass killings and tribal wars throughout the middle east. Seriously, if you look at Christianity and Islam, they have identical codes and moral guidelines, but slightly different. Mohammed's plan did work for a time, but with any religion, you have fanatics who later twist it and use it as an excuse to murder and enslave others.
These parts of the world were well known.... I have ivory coastal ancestry many tribes.... They were sold to whites that took them as slaves from other black tribes...! But you likely already know that
I am Arab, and I am a Muslim; we have been taught our history with its good and bad periods inside and outside school, and we have been taught our religion, and I'm telling you that this historical man is lying; he tells the history from the west point of view. he can lie to people in the west because the majority of people there don't speak Arabic and don't have access to the Arabic history. The slaves in Arabic history were treated as members of the family with one exception that they don't inherit the wealth of the family, and you can find that only with Muslims. Slavery existed before Islam, and when Islam came, the Islamic rules put a rule for slaves that they can work for a certain amount of period and save money and pay it for their owner to free themselves, in a law that's called Mukatabah. and for women slaves, she has her freedom, if she begot a child for her master. Slaves have never been abused in Islam, yes there were bad Muslims and Muslims are humans not angles, you will find wicked people and righteous people among them, but when we talk about Islam's rules, Islam never considered slavery as a good thing, and put strict rules to minimize slavery until it was announced as haram and forbidden in the half of the 20th century. and the real history about those pirates you can know it from their grandchildren in the Uthmanic empire telling their own history, in this show www.bing.com/videos/search?q=barbaroslar+english+subtitles+episode+1&&view=detail&mid=18DA5BEC99C34F51467318DA5BEC99C34F514673&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=%2Fvideos%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dbarbaroslar%2Benglish%2Bsubtitles%2Bepisode%2B1%26FORM%3DHDRSC4
Those are just religions that was built off a minor key factor from Christianity. You should adopt that because it’s the same thing only true and without all that complex Buddha crud that isn’t true. If you want actual truth go to the source of everything which gave to way too Judaism and Christianity.
@@radicalred474 I was christian and studied bible. It was in my past. Now I'm more into spirituality and studying universal laws. Christianity became too narrow for me.
@@sledgehammer6640 I have studied both and I practice it in my daily life. But one religion I won’t touch is Islam. Otherwise I take details from other religions and if it matches my faith I practice it. Like when I get sick I focus my life force into heat and I’ll burn the sickness out of my body. My favorite religion if I was ever anything other than a Christian would be a Shaolin monk because I believe in unity between mind body and soul to get the best know potential from yourself.
@@sledgehammer6640 Christianity is not narrow, but organized religions are. Most of the rules that are associated with Christianity are the rules with particular religions, like Catholicism or Lutheran, Baptist or whatever. When you read the actual words of Christ, there are not as many rules. Love thy brother as thyself, do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Salvation through Christ.
The Messenger of God, Muhammad pace be and blessings upon him said there is no difference between Arabic and not Arabic People and between white or black person, but except in piety.( believing in god and doing good deeds and to move away from evil deeds
@@aaliyah3037 Actually he wasn't resist (according to most history books), but he was very sexist when he copied Christianity to create Islam, despite the fact that one of his many wives was his boss which is so ironic 😂. Also, what is with you guys and "winning". A lot of Muslims and people from other religions don't give a s*** about propagating their religion, it also goes against Allah's teachings. Not to mention he/they would be very displeased to see people using his/their good name as a petty tool to conquer and murder. You do know that one of the core teachings of Allah is to respect, accept and welcome other religions such as Christianity. Did you forget Allah's teachings of love and hospitality?
Unfortinently, humans of all faiths like to use god/the gods will and twist it as an excuse to murder and dominate other's. The day we all stop bickering and learn to accept each other, regardless of religion, will be a grand time indeed.
To clarify, The fishermen who guided the pirates to the Icelandic island were English. No love was lost between the English and the Vikings AKA, Danes, Norse, and Swedes which Iceland was part of. The Vikings had raided the English islands for many years and were hated by some English. Just another example of how as human beings we are all ancestors of slaves and conquerors both, none of our collective histories is pure and innocent.
Theres about 400 years between these pirates and Vikings
@@steve-iw2bg I believe that is putting to fine a point on the issue of the Norse. Anglo-Saxons hated the Norse/Norman's much longer than the official Norman reign. Through a process of assimilation these feelings went away but was very palpable for years and years.
@@budhalbr yeah and my point is there were no hard feelings between Anglo-Saxons and norsemen by the time these pirates came around.
@@steve-iw2bg I agree. By this time most of Britain was already once referred to as Daneland.
The English guides would've been slaves acting under duress, themselves having been captured either at sea or in similar raids on English villages.
The human race as a whole just needs to say “Yeah, slavery in any form is evil” and move on. Maybe that would motivate us to actually do something about slave conditions in the modern world. They do still exist.
Yes they do
Yes, except in islam it is permissible. Don't expect them to give it up so easily.
Everyone knows it’s evil, but some don’t care.
@@standunitedorfall1863 what so you even mean
@@standunitedorfall1863 more wealth means morally better ppl
This reminds me of all my ancestors journals. Described the Muslims capturing my family attacking and killing them. Whatever they say is a lie they never treated us good they beat them horribly. And I’m lucky to even be here that’s how bad they came after my ancestors.
So true, the Muslim cut off the private parts of all male slaves, horrible.
They killed the husbands and raped the women. If the Christians refused to convert to Islam, the Muslims cut the kid's heads in front of their parents.
Thats why their existence almost none in middle eastern
@@undertheglassmoon2239 what?
Bro everyone was bad back then you r3tardd
It's a common misconception that slavery is exclusive to colonial America. Not a fact, it's been around back to the dawn of time. I'm an etymology nerd. The word slave is derived from 'slavic' the Romans pillaged and enslaved them en masse. My genealogy is Scandinavian. My ancestors were savages. Truth.
Some of your ancestors were savages while others were slaves.
It's not that long ago we had kinda an cast system. Oldest son always getting the land and F the rest of the children.
My mother have been doing research on our family and there was several that was executed in the late 1890s for theft.
Ha en go helg syster lr bror!
@K Swensen, Slaves that were slaves based on their race and their children would also be slaves was exclusive to colonial America.
@@randomperson9187 That is not true.
The only thing that was exclusive to the slaves of America was that it was almost impossible to earn one's freedom unlike an I Otttoman slave.
@@abdibgm5748 A slave's child in Ottoman slavery law could not be enslaved.
This is absolutely true.
All in all the confusion is about the term slavery being a bit too broad. Comparing American Slavery to Ottoman slavery is an exercise in futility as there were serious differences in the way they were done. For example there was no racial component in Ottoman slavery. If you got caught in war you got caught in war, end of story.
Both forms of slavery were absolutely terrible but they were so different in form and implementation that it's odd that one word would describe both.
@@randomperson9187 That's news to me thanks for letting me know.
The history of slavery has been based on greed and power, not race
I am from Austria/Europe - back in the days the austrian empire fought centuries against the turkish invasion. When Vienna our capital were fallen to the turks - Europe would not be christian. My grand grandfather was soldier in the turkish war - so in my thinking the turkish invasion is not far away and it was not nice to get in turkish hands.
Love from Austria 🇦🇹
Ya just made me do a deep dive into Austrian history
👏🏼👏🏼✊🏼
Thanks to your grand father 🙏🏻
turkish here. so there is a possibility of that your grand grandfather and mine grand fought against each other years ago and now here we are communicating each other through a platform they couldnt ever imagine never. we live in a weird world. may all of their souls rest in peace.
@@ExaelE I believe in communication also - weather culture religion and so on.
By the way: As a result of these troubles we got the coffee and a baker in Vienna invented a pastry called „Kipferl“ - in form of the turkish half moon after the first battle from Vienna - We like to eat coffee and Kipferl both together very much - it’s like a tradition 🥰
My son made his master study exam in „The History of the relationship „Hohe Pforte“ I think Babiali in turk and the K.K. Hofkanzlei means the relationship between the government in Istanbul and the government in Vienna over the centuries. A really weird one but they communicated closely. Nobody had ever mentioned this cause and the examinations board was very astonished but also very interested.
The Byzantine Empire (Christian) fell to the Ottoman Empire (Islam) in 1453. They were centered around Turkey.
I get really annoyed with the Western liberal view of the crusades. They're so dumb that they don't realise Middle Eastern Christians lived in these areas. The crusades was the West trying to "Recapture" Christian lands. These same morons tend to forget Islam's invasion of North Africa, Spain the Balkans and like you say, Byzantium.
Many forget that Istanbul was once called Constantinople, and before that Byzantium, and the "great mosque" Hagia Sophia was a Byzantine church.
@@manub.3847 And before Byzantium it was the Eastern Roman Empire.
Give credit to the amazigh or in other words moroccans
@@Spr1ggan87 He did not mean the name of the Empire, but the name of the capital on the Bosphorus. And by the way, the term "Byzantine" was invented by German historians in the 16th and 17th centuries, in order to increase the importance of the Western, German "Holy Roman Empire", and diminish the Eastern Roman Empire, which was called that from 300 and some years AD. until the fall of Constantinople in 1453! The Eastern Roman Empire existed for 1,100 years! There was a Greek-speaking area, but that part of the Roman Empire has always been that. Byzantine never existed, but rather the continuity of the Eastern Roman Empire. The citizens of the so-called "Byzantine Empire" called themselves Romans and their country: "Roman Empire".
As an Icelander, when we learn about this event in school it annoys students, because in the curriculum it follows us learning about the brutality of the viking age and the civil war that reigned here for the first 300 years after christianity took over, cumilating in a time called "Sturlungaöld".
Then we fast forward to learn about the weak Christian life that took over and as teenagers we just asked, how could that cool brutal culture fall for soft people who were victimized so easilly?
As much as we are a mix of Vikings and their English/Irish slaves we always just identify with the vikings since that is considered the more Epic culture.
hmm.. my guess is because of 'blessed is the meek' and imo it's used to guilt trip people into becoming a follower... plus, vikings were an unstoppable force to be reckoned with; how could you control and bend them to one's will in that state? the vikings *had* to be conquered lest they remain a threat and obstacle to the overlords ''holy'' roman empire and what not...which also hijacked christianity to suit their own needs, hence why the ''meek'' benefits them who are very not meek themselves..>_> ofc, all imo.
Some of the Barbay pirates were European who it was said " had taken the turban or turned Turk" (converted to Islam). They were handy as they knew the lay of the land and could advise where to land before an attack. Most had not actually converted but went through the acceptance of Islam ceremony. Some eventually even returning to their original homes after their pirate days were over. Some even became captains of slaving ships.
Good explanation. At 14:20 mark she said it that these "pirates" from Christian countries were enslaved also, just trying to get out alive and richer...
There are more slave's right now than ever in history.
Algers is present day Algeria. These were the Barbary Pirates.
I don’t know if you saw it, but at the end it said he was reunited with his wife 10 years later.
In the 16th/17th centuries ‘Turk’ was a synonym for Muslim.
@Knight what a bullshit... give me only one little evidences where did you get this shit from? If turk existed only out from the Turkistan tribes near Rusland and those tribes existed before Islam came to them how can you come with this shit stop this lies you have got a lot of beer i think our some other drugs as we know from your ancestors always liying!!!!!
Pirates didnt care about their own lives. In those days life was tough and for pirates on board ship, dangerous. They were not softies.
Turk, Saracen, Muslim, Arab, Persian, Barbarian all describes the slavers. They were from Algeria in Northern Africa. The coast of Northern African is known as the Barbary Coast, where Romans named them Barbarians. This was still a problem even after the U.S. was founded. The U.S. Navy was actually created to fight the pirates of the Barbary Coast.
No, the name Barbary Coast comes from Berber, which is the name of one of the most prominent ethnic groups in North Africa.
Im algerian🇩🇿
@@lapieblanche6863 me too
I agree people have romanticised pirates who were really horrible people whether independent or working as mercenaries for different powers. The Somali pirates (and some in East Asia I believe) are still very much like that.
I just watched your reaction to the Barbary Pirates - The Barbary Pirates were like the extension to the Arab Slave Trade aka the Trans Saharan Slave Trade. When you look into the Arab Slave Trade in Africa you can see that they were using slavery to force people, or terrify people, into Islam. When African peoples did become Muslims, they were themselves expected to give tribute to the Arab overlords and part of this was always more African Slaves. So the African people went from being taken as slaves - to being forced into taking part in the slave trade themselves. So you should not be surprised that lback Africans who had been terrified into becoming Muslim would also find themselves aboard Muslim slaving ships anywhere.
On land the Ottomans often used black people first in the attacks of the Janissaries - some of their best - but also first used soldiers. This is one reason why so few black descendants of the Muslim slavers survive in Muslim countries today. (The other most probable reason is much worse).
Thanks for sharing.Keep the good work. Remain blessed.
More please! Love to see your reaction to the Viking slave trade
My cousin married into a Turkish family so I learned a little Turkish. Their language used the Arabic alphabet until 1922. The Turkish Language is incompatible with Arabic sounds so there was a high illiteracy rate. When they switched to the Roman Alphabet, their literacy rate soared.
Stop lying
Abdulluah black servant of allah
Aka the name converted Africans often take literally calling themselves slave
Really you 2 have a channel and you think whites raided the worlds black and brown peoples ???? Ffs . Listen to a few hours of Thomas Sowell wtf are you doing if your not ???? The woman king ya she IS a slaver
@@mafiooato7233 He's not lying, Arabic is not too dissimilar to Japanese- both languages are very symbolic. It makes perfect sense that a form of writing that needs less characters will be quicker- easier to learn. Just like Arabic numerals made more sense than Roman numerals. I know that with Japanese, speaking and writing are two separate disciplines. I know that the Japanese still use guides to correctly write what they mean well into their twenties- maybe longer.
Awesome as always 👍 learning right along with ya, although, how come Hollywood keeps rehashing plots when history has loads of it 🤔🤪
agenda
Because most are lazy or leftist, and the truth doesn't support the America is bad narrative
It doesn’t fit their narrative.
At least some of those Europeans, were previously captured and converted to Islam because they could be freed since Islam said you couldn't enslave another Moslem.
Sailors use to travel along the Western European coast to trade and some to hunt for slaves.
I'm back in school. I learn a lot here. When they said served Satan, they really meant it. I think dwarfism is a genetic condition. (not sure)
The Turks, in the 17th century, were firm believers of Islam.
After thousands of years of enslaving, separating family and those who spoke the same language to prevent uprisings.
Ottoman also enslaved africans, their methods were also cruel
Another thing as these were likely farming class Scandinavians.... Not warrior Viking class.
These people were about 500 years removed from vikings.
@@TheLordUrban
What I meant by what was said, are the descendants of that class of people.
Even today warrior class genetics are obvious in genetic memory amongst those people were from that group.
Back in those days Turks mean Muslim
I never knew this before now either.
Algeria was part of the Turkish Empire at the time.
I grew up learning about old world history from my father/ history books programs ect. So I always looked as slavery as a war based prospect...
By the time I learned about US slavery I just assumed it was war based... Which it was... Africans going to war with other tribes, enslaving their opponents, and selling them to the English.
Don't get me wrong I knew that the concept of racism existed, which could be seen as readily as slavery itself, but I personally never associated the two together as a single unit until my young adult life between the ages of 20 and 30 when everyone seems to care about is black versus white racism.
And I am glad for my upbringing, because it allowed me to actually look at history and reality for what it truly is rather than the stitched work mythos that the tribalist utilize today to push their racism derived propaganda, not too dissimilar to the actions of Hitler, or more specifically the Nazi party prior to world war II...
Great video and I hope you two keep reacting to such content, because at this point it is only because of people like you that the truth still exists of which will hopefully Open the eyes of the blind, and pull them away from the shadow of ignorance and the voice of tribalism.
The Ottoman Empire was a Turkish empire and they were Muslims. It stretched form the northern territories of Africa into East Europe, up to the Hungarian Kingdom from where they also took slaves. They were fought back and kicked out of the Hungarian Kingdom in the 17th but the Balkans up to Serbia remained occupied until the first world war. The interesting thing is that the occupation of the East European territories, the Balkans by the Ottoman, Turkish, Muslim Empire started right about the time when colonizations by the British Empire and other western European countries began. Rather then helping countries in East Europe to fight back the Ottoman invasion, they were more focused on their selfish interest in finding gold an other resources in Africa and in the new world because that was their main objective.
What's your point? It's the British fualt kuz they let it happen? I happen? I heard it was Brittian was the first nation to end slavery in their country & out to abolish slavery
@@ogbigwhoopyoassnogga4854 My point is there, you just have to learn to interpret, and go to school outside the U.S Yes, it was there fault. No, they were not the first because in other countries there was no slavery.
@@johncasper5052 oh brother slavery been out to human history , the Mongols had slaves, the Chinese, the Turks, the Arabs, africans.. , native Americans had slaves
@@ogbigwhoopyoassnogga4854 Not all Africans, Asians and Europeans had slaves. It cannot be divided into races. It is based on other factors. When I say British, I am talking about those who ran the British Empire and funded those voyages and agendas to their benefit.
@@johncasper5052 now you implying that Asians & a fricans didn't empires, who had slaves? But your only referring to who funded it it & not people who did it? Bring our logic is stupid, you basically only cared who funded it, brobits all bad
when you get a change look at the country of Iceland, really hard country.
Thank you for bringing this information out to educate everyone, again thank both of you.
Do you think the midgets were maybe African pygmies with the description? Midgets don't really have long arms 🤔
The irony is that Turks were used as slaves in the Arab Caliphate. Then they became the masters and enslaved the other nations around them .
They were pretty brutal to say the least....
Turk was a general description of people from the Near East and Northern Africa. The dominant religion in those areas in the 1600s and today is Islam. Algeria is in Africa.
regarding the "dwarves" that were common in Alger, I wonder if those could have been pygmies.
regarding the belief at the time, that would have been Islam. The ottoman Empire started in the 13th century, Islam was established in the 7th.
As for other people knowing where people were to be found, the Vikings were not shy in going around and attacking other European countries. Normandie, in France, is named so because Vikings established themselves there in the 9th century.
Any chance u guys could look up irish slaves in Barbados please
Showing the bottoms of your feet to a Turk is a grave insult. (I lived in Turkey as a child)
kindly do a report on indian natives' slavery too and what is their condition, and how many millions have died because of country possession. You ability to explain and interpret is excellent.
Turks are a people originally from Siberia, specifically from the region around the Altai Mountains. In the early Middle Ages (Dark Ages) they came to Anatolia, and it is believed that they then accepted Islam as a religion (before that they were some kind of shamanist religion like most peoples in Siberia). This story takes place in the 17th century, at a time when the Ottoman Empire was at its peak (it was at its peak in the 16th and 17th centuries), when the Ottoman Turks were largely (for centuries already) Muslims by religion.
Give credit to berbers
Moroccans
The blacks might have been slaves themselves. The ottomans slave trade was going on like 700 years before the Atlantic slave trade. Thomas Sowell
When we learn anything to do with history we have to do so with an open mind, for what we see as barbaric today was common place back then all around the world and it only became barbaric to us now because some nation or nations stood up against it and changed it for better or for worse. One thing that we can all agree on is no matter what country we learn about it had its fair share of good and bad and in time maybe people will look back upon our present day learning of the history we leave behind in disgust at things we have done or maybe we will have learned from our own teachings of history and leave things for future people to learn with pride.
Another interesting topic. I HAVE to develope a hand dance with my friends - its soooo cooool!!
1600 Turks Islam. Officially the Ottoman Empire was an Islamic Caliphate ruled by a Sultan, Mehmed V, although it also contained Christians, Jews and other religious minorities.
Ottoman’s was huge empire on Netflix
I highly recommend the book "The Legacy of Arab-Islam in Africa" for a really great history lesson.
The turks attacked Ireland too , they took the irish inhabitants of Baltimore
these people are not turks they are barbary pirates from north africa
11:24 Diversity is their strength, i'm sure many progressives would be delighted.
Yes they hated Christians and still do. The Ottoman empire was dissolved in WW2 but while it existed, non-muslims paid a tax to stay alive, and no religion but islam was recognized. It's something to learn about for current times too.
Thankyou ❤
The Turks at that time under the Ottoman Empire were Muslims under Islam.
Enslaved people are always seen as less than, it makes it easier to enslave them.
It's all being hidden
Most likely they found an fisherman out on the water and use him to get everyone else.
these stories are common to all cultures that practice(d) slavery. some historians claim that other accounts of slavery in ottoman empire paint a somewhat more benign picture. what happened regardless was awful however there were more opportunities for upward mobility as a slave in the ottoman empire than there was in christian states (spain, france, venice, florence, portugal, malta, etc) who all had their own corsair fleets and did the same thing. There wasfar less hope for the muslim slave to gain freedom than the opposite. the ottomans encouraged education. it's a mixed bag and all can be villified if you look hard enough.
Tribulations. If is extremely sad, but remember Icelandic people were cold blooded pirates in the pass. Call it sins of the father comes back to revisit their sons and daughters. What goes around comes around. Remember to practice evil against others because your offspring will pay for your sins,
I'm pretty sure they were very proficient in avoiding Danger. So if they got caught they probably had no other options. It's freezing f****** cold there imagine being a woman with a couple children where you going to take them? If you don't stay warm you die of hypothermia and take the rest of the house that you and your husband built being burned to the ground I definitely think that these were smart people and if they had a way to get away they would have
that was voices of the past youtub channel
You asked," what did these people believe in ? ". They was Muslim. "In the multi-ethnic Ottoman Turkish Empire, Islam was the ideological binding agent. Religious communities belonging to the People of the Book retained their protected status based upon the so-called Millet system (milla means ‘nation’), and had autonomy where internal matters were concerned."
If I was ALL POWERFUL and heard my people crying out to me in pain, I would immediately help them. ":this is just my opinion"
I feel your pain Ms Lady, your still beautiful!
In 1627 the Turks were Muslim.
The Turks committed a genocide against Assyrians, Greeks and Armenians. Also they are trying to slaughter Armenians currently.
Yes. We are.. So?
@@hasanrızayetişSo? Don’t worry we’re coming after you soon enough don’t worry about a thing we got you. Quid pro quo remember that man because I’m a descendant of the very people your filthy people tried attacking.
@@radicalred474 ok. Waitng... Just too long time waiting know that? Please come and get what you desire. :)
@@hasanrızayetiş Oh you have no clue you think just because we’re Christians that you can do whatever you want well hmm 🤔 you have yet to see our war time order from the most high Yahweh for there is no other God but Yah and no one more powerful then the Messiah Christ Yeshua. And when he is with us no one can or will go against us bet that.
@@radicalred474 Firstly i'm an Atheist Turk..
Secondly there is no god and kind of bullshit. Wars win with power. Not fairytales.
And we have power. Get it?
Turkish were as they're today muslim.
Can you react to the first crusade
The funny part is that he never set foot into the Middle East.
We learn about this in school.
Reposting from your other video
"Islam gets its religious views from The Quran primarily and the Hadiths secondarily.
The Quran is an abrogative text, meaning the most recent writings supercede any previous verses that are contradictor, and Muhammeds final marching orders literally commands his followers to enslave non Muslims.
Also according to The Hadiths, particularily the early ones, Muhammed did the following; had sex with Aisha when she was 6, was so commonly covered in stains of semen that Aisha would pick them of with her nails, Muhammed would rant about how white his armpits and body was, made it a death penalty if someone claimed he was black, said the devil would look like a black man, said black slaves were worth a third of white slaves, had red hair which is why many Muslims dye their beard red, married his sons wife and cuckolded him and also compared Ethiopeans to raisins.
So there was always classism throughout the world based on skin color as those who worked outside had darker skin and so it was seen as a sign of being a commoner or a peasant/serf/slave etc. but given the time when "White supremacy" begins to become a thing in Europe it could be argued, and fairly easily at that, that Muhammed created the Proto White Supremacy and the original basis of the doctrine.
The reason I say this is because it wasn't until Europe started getting genocided, raped and enslaved by Islam for over half a millenia that Europe started to promote White Supremacist doctrine. Europe stalled The Caliphates long enough for The Ottomen Empire to collapse to infighting, the black death and the Golden Horde.
If it wasn't for that Europe would have lost and "Europeans" would not exist. In fact, basically none of the cultures would exist either or if they did they would be unrecognizable.
I think this, combined with the doctrine that seeped into Europe via cultural osmosis with The Ottomens cause Europeans to gain an inferiority/superiority complex in response.
I think some proof of this is that this period of history of when Europe was getting raped and ravaged is barely talked or taught about in school and its usually favorable towards Europeans military might and ignores WHY the Crusades began and erroneously attributes its sole cause to be both "an expansionary and aggressive invasion" and also as "a retaking of Jerusalem" after the fall of the Eastern Roman Empire but they always teach it as though the caliphates just filled the void left by EREs collapse without acknowledging that The Caliphates CAUSED Eastern Rome to collapse. Eastern Rome continued on fairly well for decades after Western Rome fell UNTIL The Caliphates almost completely Genocided, via rape and murder, The Byzantines. Now all that is left of The Byzantines are the people called The Turks and some Armenians who are also still being genocided by Turkey.
The West as a whole seems to pay no attention to what happened leading up to The Crusades and Spains "Racist" Reconquista but never mention what happened leading up TO it."
The Turks were Muslim. To understand the attitudes between Christians and Muslims you need to check out a documentary on The Crusades. The Crusades were a series of religious wars initiated, supported, and sometimes directed by the Catholic Church in the medieval period. Essentially it was European Christians vs Muslims from the Ottoman Empire and North Africa. The best known of these Crusades are those to the Holy Land in the period between 1095 and 1291 that were intended to recover Jerusalem and its surrounding area from Islamic rule. Without modern weapons (they used swords, lances, spears, battle axes, maces, crossbows, longbows, and daggers) it is estimated over 3 million men died (although it could be as high as 9 million since records in the East were sketchy and not well recorded).
"initiated by the catholic church".... I hope you are not dismissing the previous islamic ocupation of European territory...as in more than half "christian land" had been taken by islam. lets no pretend the moors/arabs/muslim were about peace and love or live and let live...
The first call for a crusade happened in 846 AC, when Arabs sailed up the Tiber and raided St Peter's in Rome. "REconquista" for nothing you know...
I'm not saying Crusaders were saints or even that they had only honest and pure intentions, they were trying to conquer as well, and many were sadistic F'ers, ofc...but the fact is the Crusades were a response, Europe did not draw first blood.
@@ricardoc.2535 yup!
@@maryanndeweerd2570 yup, before Islam it was the Roman everywhere and so on.....
@@jasfan8247 yes
@@jasfan8247 and rome at the start wasnt a christian nation, theres a reason why roman myths are simiar to greek myths, its that over time rome became christian. why cause their leader decided it so.
No, he said English fisher man... they were attacking Danish people (an entirely different race from the english... different, language, different heritage, ancestry, and so on).
Who are the English, decended from Danes, anglosaxons and Norwegians. Your very wrong. The English language has more in common with old Norse than any other language.
@@jodawson5268 Are you trolling.
Everyone is descended from roughly Middle Eastern/Indian like peoples, out of Africa (somewhere abouts the area where Egypt is now).
This is not the point of anything, any more than what you are saying... but even if you offered proof that they became Danish Before they became English, it would not make any difference.
You can tell that they share closer common ancestry of course, as do the Celts (Who are actually much closer to "Viking" peoples, genetically, than are English people... in fact, even though both the Scots and Irish are Celts, with common origin in Gaelic language, Mythology, and Culture, as would be the case for all the various "Viking" peoples, but most people wouldn't say they are the same people, especially after all this time, only that they share a common ancestry).
So, the fact remains that the English are definitely not so closely related as to be considered the same people, nor for there to be any serious argument to the point... one of the ways you can tell this is the case, no matter how similar they may appear, is that they have a different language (they do, don't know what you're smoking), and therefore diverged long enough ago to develop different forms of communication (they needed interpreters to talk to one another... somebody had to learn the others language, because they did not know it to begin with).
This is no different than people pretending that ever African is the same race... they are not (there are over 50 countries in Africa, they have even more languages, because there have been many more than 50 tribes of people in Africa).
After you have developed your own independent culture (historically including a different language, but not always... Celtic peoples, "Viking" peoples, Canadians, et cetra), after you have settled into different lands, began to adapt and survive in different way (different foods, climates, and so on), you are no longer the same people (same species, same sure... people no) ... saying otherwise, is no different than blacks claiming they are African, or American whites claiming to be European, this would be ridiculous (just like Hispanic peoples are not Spanish people, and actually are many different people, especially due to various indigenous add mixtures, creating new peoples, despite inheriting the Spanish language) since Americans are mixed peoples, even now in the melting pot never having a chance to settle into one new thing (though we are still a distinct people, due to culture).
Any way, the point was, there is no reason to say "English Fishermen" if they were not English, if they were Danish fishermen, he would simply have said fishermen... the distinction was made because it was important (because it described a separate group... not by occupation, but by origin).
@Rahn Singh never heard of the Dane law have you. Look it up.
@@jodawson5268 Don't get the wrong idea... I'm not saying there is no Danish ancestry among the English. Viking invaded and settled in English lands (I'm pretty sure most people are aware of this by now). What I'm saying to you, is that this incident (which seems to have occurred during those times) would involve English people who were just as likely not to have Danish ancestors (if not more so) than to have them. If you want to argue about modern English people, I'm sure they got much more than danish ancestry... but that is not the conversation. If you are trying to confuse the issue to make a point... we might as well just stop talking about it, because I have no interest in intellectual dishonesty or point making (I'm am only having this conversation because there seems to be some misunderstanding going on and I felt some obligation to mitigate that (however, it is not a strong obligation, so I will not indulge argument for argument sake... it simply does not benefit me in any way to do so).
At the end of the day, the story was told in simple language, it was easy to follow, and there should be no misunderstand... or at least, that's the way it came across to me. I really don't understand why any one is reading in to it, beyond what was said, not sure where the interpretation is required... so my original response was just that (for the sake of language and clarity, why are we starting a round of telephone, when it was pretty clear what was being said).
@@jodawson5268The Danes occupied a large section of England for some time, but the modern population show few genetic markers. It seems the Danes and existing Brythonic people did not inter marry much, but the Anglo Saxons did settle and marry and have children with the locals across England. Oxford University did a study, using people who knew that their great grandparents all came from the region they lived in. It shows Danes didnt leave much DNA, but the Saxons did. People in the UK have up to about 40% max Saxon DNA, with the rest being Celtic/Brythonic. Those in North Wales are mostly Brythonic still, and different Celtic groups across Cornwall, Wales, Scotland. People in Cornwall and Dorset, next to each other, show very distinct genetic markers. It's interesting how people moved about and how they lived socially, either seperately or mass integration.
It's bad si u always say we always mixed race now y know why some araib people have lighter skin and blue eyes
It's pillaged
Fun facts, the bulk of Ottoman slaves were actually in Europe not the middle east.
Europeans enslaved Africans, Ottomans enslaved Europeans lol
The Ottoman empire was muslim.
Heartbreaking 😢
If this video is completely about the Ottoman and Arab treatment of black slaves, yellow are going to be sick to your stomach and probably crying. I was crying watching a video on how the West was the last to have slavery & the first to end it. After Britain ended slavery 30 years before America, their navy was the largest in the world, and they would sit on the eastern side of Africa between Africa and Turkey and they would chase ships down to see if they had slaves and then when America ended slavery, we started helping them..
I don’t even want to go into the detail of what would happen to the slaves on the ships that the Ottomans and Arabs wanted to get off the ship before they got caught by Americans in the British because it’s too sick and heartbreaking but the worst thing that the Turks and Aarons did to their male slaves is that they castrated all the men and they would meet with the female slaves .
I’m from Sudan , formally know. As nubia, the sla&e trade back in the days was not focused on black people it was Islamically abolished gradually ad the reward for Atq Rawaba which means emancipating a slave was so great in Islam that people started letting sla:e go gradually over the years. USA only started stopping the slav:e market less than 100 yrs ago
The first states to join the union (USA) were in 1787. Slavery ended here in all states in 1865. 78 years later as a country. 1865 was one hundred and fifty seven years ago. Also, not every state was a slave state. 1/2 were free & 1/2 were slave states. By 1790, there were 13 small colonies of the USA in a small area of land. It wasn't the entire 50 states as it is today. I'm not condoning it or minimizing it because not one person should ever be enslaved, and I know it's part of our history that will never be erased, and it shouldn't be. I'm only replying because it ended more than 150 years ago in the USA, not less than 100 year ago.
Slavery started long before the USA was founded, and it's still going on today in some places in some sort of way.
You should look up the Treaty of Tripoli and also the Barbary Wars.
While The Arab Slave Trade was not focused on one specific group based on most leftovers and props and evidences and hook liners it has been shown that most parts treated The Zanj of East Africa as the lowest group of them all compared to other Non Ethnic Arabs yeah.
@@matthewmann8969 what evidences exactly and what probs?
The british and french forced the arabs and your people to end slavery Ya Jahelll
@@_hunter_hunter1048 the british and the french were colonizing ur people u stu:pid fu:;
Christian persecution...
why do you react to drawings as if they were photographs? those drawings are just an illustration combined with the read narration. who knows when those drawings were created. they may have been drawn at the same time as that documentary was made.
It is hard to be a Turk, because you have to fight the world. But it is harder not to be a Turk, because then you would have to fight the Turks.
I'll be Cossack
Their belief was and is still today Sunni Islam
turkish just means ottoman - they are north africans, not turks.
Turks were Muslim
the reason there was blacks among them is becaue the city they came from is my city in Africa but was ruled by the turks because we invited them to protect us
Ottomans and later turkish were Muslims
When did the muslim religion start?
Islam was created around the year 610 CE, after Christianity. Mohammed basically studied Christianity and created a copy of it to end the mass killings and tribal wars throughout the middle east. Seriously, if you look at Christianity and Islam, they have identical codes and moral guidelines, but slightly different. Mohammed's plan did work for a time, but with any religion, you have fanatics who later twist it and use it as an excuse to murder and enslave others.
610 ad
These parts of the world were well known....
I have ivory coastal ancestry many tribes.... They were sold to whites that took them as slaves from other black tribes...! But you likely already know that
I am Arab, and I am a Muslim; we have been taught our history with its good and bad periods inside and outside school, and we have been taught our religion, and I'm telling you that this historical man is lying; he tells the history from the west point of view. he can lie to people in the west because the majority of people there don't speak Arabic and don't have access to the Arabic history. The slaves in Arabic history were treated as members of the family with one exception that they don't inherit the wealth of the family, and you can find that only with Muslims. Slavery existed before Islam, and when Islam came, the Islamic rules put a rule for slaves that they can work for a certain amount of period and save money and pay it for their owner to free themselves, in a law that's called Mukatabah. and for women slaves, she has her freedom, if she begot a child for her master. Slaves have never been abused in Islam, yes there were bad Muslims and Muslims are humans not angles, you will find wicked people and righteous people among them, but when we talk about Islam's rules, Islam never considered slavery as a good thing, and put strict rules to minimize slavery until it was announced as haram and forbidden in the half of the 20th century. and the real history about those pirates you can know it from their grandchildren in the Uthmanic empire telling their own history, in this show
www.bing.com/videos/search?q=barbaroslar+english+subtitles+episode+1&&view=detail&mid=18DA5BEC99C34F51467318DA5BEC99C34F514673&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=%2Fvideos%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dbarbaroslar%2Benglish%2Bsubtitles%2Bepisode%2B1%26FORM%3DHDRSC4
Yeah was not pretty, beautiful, amazing, or cute.
In case some folks wonder is this video
factual? Trust me it is.
Yes, I'm 1st.
Turks were, and still are, Muslim.
The Ottomans and Aarons have always been Muslim by the way
Islam is their religion
He ain't right..
The Turkish were typical muslims of the time.
Tyska nazizter hade samma ide
Blacks should adopt Daoism or Buddhism lol
Those are just religions that was built off a minor key factor from Christianity. You should adopt that because it’s the same thing only true and without all that complex Buddha crud that isn’t true. If you want actual truth go to the source of everything which gave to way too Judaism and Christianity.
@@radicalred474 I was christian and studied bible. It was in my past. Now I'm more into spirituality and studying universal laws. Christianity became too narrow for me.
@@sledgehammer6640 I have studied both and I practice it in my daily life. But one religion I won’t touch is Islam. Otherwise I take details from other religions and if it matches my faith I practice it. Like when I get sick I focus my life force into heat and I’ll burn the sickness out of my body. My favorite religion if I was ever anything other than a Christian would be a Shaolin monk because I believe in unity between mind body and soul to get the best know potential from yourself.
@@sledgehammer6640 Christianity is not narrow, but organized religions are. Most of the rules that are associated with Christianity are the rules with particular religions, like Catholicism or Lutheran, Baptist or whatever. When you read the actual words of Christ, there are not as many rules. Love thy brother as thyself, do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Salvation through Christ.
The video is full of absolute lies
The Messenger of God, Muhammad pace be and blessings upon him said there is no difference between Arabic and not Arabic People and between white or black person, but except in piety.( believing in god and doing good deeds and to move away from evil deeds
in the farewell sermon.
Dude muhammad was racist af 😂
@@Yolk421 No he wasn't. But keep lying. Islam will win with or without you.
@@aaliyah3037 Actually he wasn't resist (according to most history books), but he was very sexist when he copied Christianity to create Islam, despite the fact that one of his many wives was his boss which is so ironic 😂. Also, what is with you guys and "winning". A lot of Muslims and people from other religions don't give a s*** about propagating their religion, it also goes against Allah's teachings. Not to mention he/they would be very displeased to see people using his/their good name as a petty tool to conquer and murder. You do know that one of the core teachings of Allah is to respect, accept and welcome other religions such as Christianity. Did you forget Allah's teachings of love and hospitality?
Unfortinently, humans of all faiths like to use god/the gods will and twist it as an excuse to murder and dominate other's. The day we all stop bickering and learn to accept each other, regardless of religion, will be a grand time indeed.