@gamerino6661 You can watch them pitch down once you pop off the ram. Might i suggest using full real as to keep them up at all times to avoid them depressing to the extent they did.
What do you mean didn't wing sweep? If you are talking about the wings being swept back, the takeoff would've been even worse and made the Fencer fall faster into the water
Just saying there were designs for a naval variant of the fencer for their full size carrier they got 50% done right before the collapse but even then it wouldnt have 3 drop tanks maybe 1 or 2 with 2 or 3 ashm's
He's a US supporter of course, he legit outs a fighter jet against a bomber in a take off/ landing test. While adding bigger handicaps to the russian planes
So it’s important to note that aircraft that operate on ramp carriers cannot carry a full load of fuel/ weapons as they’d be to heavy (this is why the US uses catapults and the UK wanted to use them instead of the ramp)
"But ut does feel like it has a much better TWR" Oh,no shit,I wouldnt be able to imagine a plane being able to take off unless it had full fuel and 3 gas tanks
Su-24 was unfair. LDG Gear wasn't retracted Extra fuel and tanks Too much elevator for it to function as intendes That's a lot of aerodynamic resistance, and a lot of elevator which made the air separate from the wing's surface, thus not generating enough lift. Try again, with the correct configuration, and it would take off. Will it lose a bit of altitude? Yes. But it will not crash into the water Additionally, the Komet was a very light aircraft and the Phantom was designed with a navy variant, so it is not a surprise
Just because it's a naval aircraft it doesn't mean it's going to be easy, US carriers use CATOBAR system, which means it needs of a catapult for taking off. Also irl even the Su-33 cannot takeoff from the Kuznetsov unless it has no weapons or like 2% fuel 😂😂😂
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Lol 3 fuel tanks for the SU-24 seems fair
It wouldn't have took off anyways
It would without fuel tank@AirRBnpc
@@CYXON_Engineer did you try it youself?
@topnorth-oj5lg yes
@@CYXON_Engineer you should try the phantom with full fuel and tanks to see if it will take off
Putting full fuel + 3 fuel tanks seems pretty fucking fair 💀
Nah he did the su-24 dirty
I rhink He is doing this on revenge of Tesla crash Bec hr is getting paid by Ell on musk for revenge bases
I AGREE
redo the SU 24, without the additional fuel tanks
Agreed
Fr not even the Su33 takes off with full fuel when it has weapons
@@theserpent4495 not true, irl they take off in shorter distance with full arnament and fuel
You didn’t even pull up with the SU-24 lmao
I did, you can see the elevator full activated
@gamerino6661 You can watch them pitch down once you pop off the ram. Might i suggest using full real as to keep them up at all times to avoid them depressing to the extent they did.
Even if he pulled up harder it wasn't gonna go anywhere, the jet was pulling down on its own
@@Bob-Of-Bobsit pitched down because it was stalling
you can literally see his cursor going up and the elevators, tf u mean??
The carrier going full speed !!!!! It has to have an ocean going tug with it at all times.
Su 24 wasn't fair because it had heavy bombs and a fuel tank, and you didn't wing sweep
Doesn’t swept wings make it harder to climb at low speeds because of the smaller wing surface?
@@Steve7711WT Exactly. Spread wings are better for low speeds, and swept wings are better for high speeds
What do you mean didn't wing sweep? If you are talking about the wings being swept back, the takeoff would've been even worse and made the Fencer fall faster into the water
Wing sweep would have made it worse
Just saying there were designs for a naval variant of the fencer for their full size carrier they got 50% done right before the collapse but even then it wouldnt have 3 drop tanks maybe 1 or 2 with 2 or 3 ashm's
Average american Warthunder player be like:
Do Russian planes dirty
average european person: makes fun of americans after colonizing world and causing 18 famines in india, permanently damaging the population.
@@VeryGrainyBread-c6k ???
I'm surprised you used the F-4J instead of the F-4S kudos to you lol I feel like the F-4J is almost forgotten
3 external tanks, mf dosent like the su24 I guess
He's a US supporter of course, he legit outs a fighter jet against a bomber in a take off/ landing test. While adding bigger handicaps to the russian planes
Comparing a bomber with 3 fuel tanks that’s not naval to a naval fighter/multirole aircraft without load is crazy
The SU-24 did have a proposed naval variant for the Orel carrier project, so it’s definitely possible, just not if you tack on 70,000 fuel tanks
The Me-163 was infamous for the fact that it had to be roped to the ground when parked, as a literal gust of wind could send it airborne
So it’s important to note that aircraft that operate on ramp carriers cannot carry a full load of fuel/ weapons as they’d be to heavy (this is why the US uses catapults and the UK wanted to use them instead of the ramp)
Was the carrier moving full speed into the wind? If I remember correctly the Kuz IRL has to do that, a bit like a WW2 carrier
Yes, you can see it in the Speedo of planes, they're going at 60kph while stopped on the carrier before takeoff
This channel is growing fast man good videos
Naval based and Seapilled.
yeah seems pretty fair how you got full fuel tank and 3 external fuel tanks on the SU-24
Seems like it has a better thrus to weight ratio 😂 no way
"But ut does feel like it has a much better TWR"
Oh,no shit,I wouldnt be able to imagine a plane being able to take off unless it had full fuel and 3 gas tanks
thats because the F-4 is a flying brick, but remember! put enough power on something and it'll fly like a disabled pigeon
It is naval based but the US use catapults
how do you apply the brakes on the aircraft? I've never figured it out and I can't ever find a keybind for "brakes". it would make life so much easier
Hey! So i recently received some advice from a friend jus use reverse trust almost every plane doesn't have it and it puts the brakes
Brake can be used only if ur not flying. To use them just hold the thrust decrease button
Okay u forgot to do the Soviet su33 naval fighter
How to activate full afterburner without moving?
Wasnt the kuznetsov a factory? Making ceramic?
How do i spawn carriers with planes that aren't for carriers?
Holy crap how many su24 glazers are in here
How'd you get that map tutorial please it will give you a lot of views
Just test drive with russia
@tacticsforfritz what if I want to land an American plane
@@KingPlays-5 You can't get the Admiral Kutzenov with the US test drive
@@tacticsforfritz but he got the German me-163 to take off from the Kuznetsov, so it's not russian test flight
@utac2810 There's probably another way, but the easiest way is to use the test flight
Su-24 was unfair.
LDG Gear wasn't retracted
Extra fuel and tanks
Too much elevator for it to function as intendes
That's a lot of aerodynamic resistance, and a lot of elevator which made the air separate from the wing's surface, thus not generating enough lift. Try again, with the correct configuration, and it would take off.
Will it lose a bit of altitude? Yes. But it will not crash into the water
Additionally, the Komet was a very light aircraft and the Phantom was designed with a navy variant, so it is not a surprise
rage baiting
How do you spawn the Kuznetsov for other planes?
CDK
Su-24 with 3 fuel tanks and F-4 with zero ? Where is something fair ? BRUH ?
3 additional fuel tanks, my guy why even bothered to do so?
Well how about F15E?
No thrust deflectors?
Didn’t you say the F4 Phantom was naval so of course it would take off
but its meant for catapult launch
Ok
Komet ❎
Rocket Plane ✅
Really... a fully loaded fuel 3 tanks su24. Thats dirty
Full fuel and 3 fuel tanks on su24? Now try 10% fuel and no payload just like the F4 phantom!
How do you troddle up the engines without moving?
you didn't even try and get the gear up on the su24. that would help tremendousy
How do u spool the engines in the game
Use brakes with reverse trust almost every time works
@yomaxelpeor W thanks
Maybe dont use 3 fuel tanks on the Su?
3 fuel tanks is unfair
Bro the f4 is an engine with wings
Pride of russian fleet LMAO
redi the su 24 without fuel tanks + low fuel 30%
Do the wheels on the ME-163 fall of automatically or are they linked with the gear up keybind?
They fall off automatically
@@Magus_Angel13 oh ok thanks! Just curious lol
Landing flaps + 3 fuel tanks? Bros fr stupid
How do u spawn on there
False. The kuznetsov has a top speed of 0km/h. It hasn't moved under its own power, without catching on fire, in years
Song name please ?
F -4j phantom was a brick
Bro how, the phantom is a flying brick
Have u tried Not using navel or very light fighter jets from the US to compare them against Russian "LITERAL BOMBERS "?
The su-24 wouldn't do it anywsys with or without fuel tank
Su24 is very under powered good top speed but bad acceleration not cuz of the fuel tanks
why do people glaze the su-24 its not that good of a jet
Just because it's a naval aircraft it doesn't mean it's going to be easy, US carriers use CATOBAR system, which means it needs of a catapult for taking off.
Also irl even the Su-33 cannot takeoff from the Kuznetsov unless it has no weapons or like 2% fuel 😂😂😂