This is very interesting. But I think the software equal segmented the distance, would you please explain how the fastest route identified? Each segmented distance 1165. is that reasonable to justify? Thanks for your response in advance.
Great overview on linear referencing tool with a fun applied example. In resetting the M-values and have time "interpolate" between start and end point of the single-line, it seems that you create equal proportions due to the relative allocation of the new M-values. Your new 2-min segments in the event layer seem to have the same size if you truncate the digits?
+Thomas Wuerzer That's exactly what I was thinking. Not the appropriate way to determine time since it proportions time lengths based on start to finish values. This would assume travel speed was constant across the trip. The slight differences in time segments were probably due to the slight variation in vertices placement on the track.
I say, this is great tutorial. I appreciate very much!
How to create Table to synchronize the route line. I am missing this step. Can you show me how to get the attribute data on the feature class of B2C
Hi man, have you solved this problem?
This is very interesting. But I think the software equal segmented the distance, would you please explain how the fastest route identified? Each segmented distance 1165. is that reasonable to justify?
Thanks for your response in advance.
Thanks Usman! Any idea how to set the intervals of the M value? Mine route just shows five lines, when I need to put 100 points in.
When I use the create routes tool, it does not create a field of the shape length in the attribute table - any ideas why that might be? thanks!
Thanks for sharing. The minute is interpolated from Distance, which means every segment has same velocity, how to decide which segment is fastest?
Great overview on linear referencing tool with a fun applied example. In resetting the M-values and have time "interpolate" between start and end point of the single-line, it seems that you create equal proportions due to the relative allocation of the new M-values. Your new 2-min segments in the event layer seem to have the same size if you truncate the digits?
+Thomas Wuerzer That's exactly what I was thinking. Not the appropriate way to determine time since it proportions time lengths based on start to finish values. This would assume travel speed was constant across the trip. The slight differences in time segments were probably due to the slight variation in vertices placement on the track.
+Jason Barnes Is there anyway to determine the distance each two minute segment actually took?
I think the points measurement usually have time tags, perhaps that could be used.
Thank you - it helped me a lot.
Great Tutorial!
Thank you! Can you share sample sheet?
Thanks Usman, great video.
Thanks for sharing this information...It's a good tutorial
Sir can you make videos excersice on "Creating and calibrating route data in arcgis 10.1"
Sir which mobile app you are using for traffic data collection?.. I'm using Next logger but the data that i have collected is not accurate.
Great tutorial
Thank you Usman!
You are welcome Falcon
Thank you.
Can I contact you? Do you have an email?
thanks man
thank u ...
so goof😉
There must be an easier method.. too many steps, too messy.
Good lord, if you are going to make videos, SPEAK UP.