This war is over since the very beginning. The American military complex is making money more than two years out of this "special military operation" the longer the better.
Freeland "ominously" saying "our time in government will come to an end" was in reference to short-term political games and thinking of the bigger picture. There was nothing ominous about it.
The struggle for Canada's first past the post is that just 10-15% of the population changing their mind means the difference between Liberal and Tory majorities. (Both of which are terrible... let's all remember how hated Harper was when he left.)
harper never even got close to how unpopular Trudeau is, Trudeau has polled 30% or below for most of his time as pm since 2017 which is literally unheard of and lost the plurality of votes to conservatives twice which has also never happened. not a harper fan but Trudeau is literally our most unpopular pm ever,
@@yungbenzo5 Harper was down below 30% in a number of polls, and if you want the least popular PM ever look at Mulroney who almost dropped to the single digits for his approval rating by the end.
The real story is how half the population of Canada hated a man that built our country into one that had a dollar at one point stronger than the US. Now we went left and had a tyrant that has proven to be corrupt, economically destructive and irresponsible with immigration. The only thing more insane is that people still vote Liberal/NDP. I'd take Harper any day.
@@Balorian you don't vote for the prime minister you vote for the party, I'm considering voting conservative or future party, but that doesn't change that Pollievre is a populist muppet.
@@Dan-vu3vt not really, it mostly just makes you question their attention to detail. They're a relatively small news outlet which means they make these types of mistakes a lot. It's not good, but also I haven't seen anything to indicate that these mistakes go beyond the realm of the relatively trivial, as they usually get the major details correct and present them in a fairly balanced way.
@@Dan-vu3vt There is literally no news that do not face issues with typos and names misspellings. Heck most politicians fail to remember a single data point correctly, a misspelled name is irrelevant.
If we’re being honest, a lot of the “good news” they were reporting on made no sense in the context of the videos. The simple and sad truth is that there really isn’t much good news at all in the world at the moment. A lot of the “good news” TLDR would report on in those segments were minuscule things in comparison to the rest of the video. I remember one video which had a section about the possibility of nuclear war breaking out due to Russia changing their own threshold for nuclear retaliation. But then the good news was a single animal being rescued or something small like that (I can’t exactly remember). But that’s the point, nobody wants to hear good news in this day and age, and nobody will remember the good. Bad news sells more and unfortunately there is a lot more bad news to talk about than good.
Here you go, boss. Found a headline from just this week :) '400,000 Kids Now Have LEGOs to Play with Thanks to Parents Donating 1.2 Mil Pounds of Used Bricks So Far'
Wait, chemical weapons? When did that happen? The only thing I can think of was the phosphorus bombs but I don’t think those are classified as chemical weapons. That’s a real big thing if true.
Russians repeatedly used chemical agents in the siege of Mariupol and during attack on Ukrainian trenches on multiple fronts. Use of such weapons in war constitutes a war crime, and Kirilov was a legitimate military target anyway, so makes sense someone took care of him. As expected, russians denied use of such weapons and then posted the evidence confirming it themselves.
Al-Assad seems to be saying what he has to. Honestly, I hope there is some legitimacy to what he's saying and a better version of the Ba'ath movement emerges from this mess.
“Oh I didn’t leave voluntarily. I just accidentally got on the wrong plane and it just so happen to go to Moscow”
A six minute video, followed by 3 minutes of sponsors? That is bold.
Are you aware of the pause button?
At least they put it at the end of the video rather than halfway in, so it doesn't ruin the news story/pacing
dude, it's literally in the end, stop whining
troll
These Russian generals really need to stop smoking. Not even Moscow is safe from these accidents
Lol three minutes of ads at the end, plus self-promotions in the middle? This is getting out of hand
Well then don't watch it.
I'd rather take these things in exchange for well explained news.
troll
I will say this again: remember when this war was only supposed to take a couple of months?
And where is the source?
@@tiglishnobody8750Do you genuinely think that this was Russia’s intended outcome? A years long slugfest?
3 days*
This war is over since the very beginning. The American military complex is making money more than two years out of this "special military operation" the longer the better.
@@ImStevan Said by US general Millery
Freeland "ominously" saying "our time in government will come to an end" was in reference to short-term political games and thinking of the bigger picture. There was nothing ominous about it.
Almost a third of this video is an ad, reduce your expenses
Look at the ratio of ads in cable news before you complain.
This isnt cable news@@jerry3790. Stop the glazing
That's like commenting on a short film that 'almost a quarter of this is credits, improve your quality'
troll
The struggle for Canada's first past the post is that just 10-15% of the population changing their mind means the difference between Liberal and Tory majorities. (Both of which are terrible... let's all remember how hated Harper was when he left.)
At least Harper didn't run the largest deficit in Canadian history
harper never even got close to how unpopular Trudeau is, Trudeau has polled 30% or below for most of his time as pm since 2017 which is literally unheard of and lost the plurality of votes to conservatives twice which has also never happened. not a harper fan but Trudeau is literally our most unpopular pm ever,
@@yungbenzo5 Harper was down below 30% in a number of polls, and if you want the least popular PM ever look at Mulroney who almost dropped to the single digits for his approval rating by the end.
The real story is how half the population of Canada hated a man that built our country into one that had a dollar at one point stronger than the US. Now we went left and had a tyrant that has proven to be corrupt, economically destructive and irresponsible with immigration. The only thing more insane is that people still vote Liberal/NDP. I'd take Harper any day.
@@Balorian you don't vote for the prime minister you vote for the party, I'm considering voting conservative or future party, but that doesn't change that Pollievre is a populist muppet.
Kiliov? his name tag says Kirillov...
Yeah but he got killed so his posthumous name is Killiov now.
Mistakes like these make you question the integrity of a news source
@@Dan-vu3vt not really, it mostly just makes you question their attention to detail. They're a relatively small news outlet which means they make these types of mistakes a lot. It's not good, but also I haven't seen anything to indicate that these mistakes go beyond the realm of the relatively trivial, as they usually get the major details correct and present them in a fairly balanced way.
@@123four... I get that, but considering 1/3 of their already TLDR videos are ads, they don't have that much content to mess up.
@@Dan-vu3vt There is literally no news that do not face issues with typos and names misspellings.
Heck most politicians fail to remember a single data point correctly, a misspelled name is irrelevant.
Every year seems to be unique and important
You mean to tell me General Kiliov is now general Killedov?
No uplifting news AGAIN
WHY??????????????????????????????
If we’re being honest, a lot of the “good news” they were reporting on made no sense in the context of the videos.
The simple and sad truth is that there really isn’t much good news at all in the world at the moment. A lot of the “good news” TLDR would report on in those segments were minuscule things in comparison to the rest of the video.
I remember one video which had a section about the possibility of nuclear war breaking out due to Russia changing their own threshold for nuclear retaliation. But then the good news was a single animal being rescued or something small like that (I can’t exactly remember). But that’s the point, nobody wants to hear good news in this day and age, and nobody will remember the good. Bad news sells more and unfortunately there is a lot more bad news to talk about than good.
Here you go, boss. Found a headline from just this week :)
'400,000 Kids Now Have LEGOs to Play with Thanks to Parents Donating 1.2 Mil Pounds of Used Bricks So Far'
3:40 his name is pronounced jug-meet. Hard J sound not a Y sound.
Wait, chemical weapons? When did that happen? The only thing I can think of was the phosphorus bombs but I don’t think those are classified as chemical weapons.
That’s a real big thing if true.
Russians repeatedly used chemical agents in the siege of Mariupol and during attack on Ukrainian trenches on multiple fronts. Use of such weapons in war constitutes a war crime, and Kirilov was a legitimate military target anyway, so makes sense someone took care of him. As expected, russians denied use of such weapons and then posted the evidence confirming it themselves.
Ukraine is becoming Mossad 2.0 💪 which makes sense because Russia is the European version of Iran 😂
Al-Assad seems to be saying what he has to.
Honestly, I hope there is some legitimacy to what he's saying and a better version of the Ba'ath movement emerges from this mess.
0:52 *2014
Trudeau won't give up his precious.
Trudeau should call for a snap election asap
Slava Ukraïnï 🇺🇦
Who's manning the Russian side of the Washington-Moscow nuclear hotline?
its joever
💕💕💕
You found a biden sucess?!
Rip bozo
If Syria did this, wouldn't it be reported as state-sponsored terrorism?
Syria isn't the victim of a russian war of aggression, and a military general is no civilian target
No. In fact, russia has been doing the same thing in other countries multiple times and I hear no one calling it terrorism.
You know what was state sponsored terrorism? The Assad regime killing hundred thousands of it's civilians during the civil war.
"Head of Russian Nuclear and Chemical weapons accuses Ukraine of using biological weapons."