CJI DY Chandrachud on Same-Sex Marriage Judgement | Briefly Explained
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- India’s Chief Justice DY Chandrachud addressed the Supreme Court's stance on same-sex marriage, emphasizing the judiciary's duty to humanize the law without disregarding it. He highlighted that recognizing same-sex marriages falls under Parliament's purview, as the current Special Marriage Act specifies unions between a 'man' and a 'woman'. The Chief Justice Of India was speaking at an Oxford Union event.
#samesexmarriage #dychandrachud #supremecourt
Welcome to Briefly, your destination for immersive storytelling made simple. Join us as we take deep dives into captivating narratives, unravel complex stories, and deliver entertaining content for you. From series like "Framed" to many more unheard stories, we bring you a world of knowledge, one brief story at a time. Subscribe now to embark on a journey of discovery and entertainment with us!
Briefly is your one-stop destination for all things news. Like, Share, and Subscribe!
For more updates follow us on:
Facebook: / englishnewj
Twitter: / newjplus
Instagram: / englishnewj
The fact that the chief justice of the highest court of India has to go to Oxford to discuss these things pisses me off
You wouldn't know about the intellectual side of India for aaj tak or any those kind of medias for that matter but from these BBC and Bloomberg people only, that's positioning..
@@drutwin ya maybe but that's for india and Indians to decide
@@AmanChettri-q9k okay then ?
He doesn't. There are plenty of discussions of his on various panels in India. You can watch all of them on RUclips.
I think he wants to present himself as a liberal judge, but that's not true. He has not been able to safeguard the constitution and the people of India. He is not even allowing bail, for example, Umar Khalid has been arrested for 3 years under UAPA but there is no bail, and there is no proof against him.
Then make another marriage act same sex marriage act. How difficult is that. ??? India is a Hindu country and not an Abrahamic country. In Hindu culture there is nothing against homosexuality.
Very well said❤
But on the ground there is very little support except the creamy layer of the urban elite. So this does not give politicians the interest to do
@@Karthi4Vancity cause the government actually doesn't care for the people or underprivileged they Carre for votes...
This nation is not Hindu-centric; it is a secular country with a predominantly Hindu population. Regardless of religious affiliation, the prioritization of human rights must take precedence over any limitations imposed by religious beliefs.
india is secular country
A lot of people have preconceived impressions about what LGBT actually is. They see it the way media portray them holding a rainbow flag and covered in heavy and exaggerated makeup, having beard yet wearing jewellery this is part of it but not limited to that only. There are also those people who are well built as masculine as a heterosexual man who behave like any ordinary man but not straight. When people began to have broader understanding of this subject there’s going to be more acceptance.
Truly said 👍
Yeah you're very right ..
Well said , but some so called masculine men who look heterosexual they themselves are not willing to accept them selves that they belong to this community due to societal pressure or some norms which is the most concerning and disturbing thing to me.
@@tharunputta9950 they are selfish, greedy & dishonest.
Very true. And people in this country always confuse being gay with being a ‘third’ gender when gay men identify as much male as any straight man if not more.
The same-sex marriage debate needs to initiated by the parliament.
Then same sex marriage will never be legalised at all. Our uneducated politicians won't do it.
We don't have time for this shit.
@@unknown-mx9itnobody's inviting you 😂😂
I don't expect those conservative members of parliament to do that. They'll never approve it
When it's about wasting taxpayers' money, every opinion is invited. @@JaydeepLakum-tq3dv
As a gay man and a lawyer, I agree with him
That's why we need a Uniform Civil Code legalising same sex marriage
@@varoonnone7159 you think you and I will be included in uniform civil code? If you see the states that are starting to implement ucc there is no inclusion there!
Their is no BJP in majority, we required 2/3 rd majority. It will be very difficult to implement. UCC was in Manifesto of BJP but now we have to wait for 2029
Sa me s ex marriage will never be legalized.
@@नयनगिरडकरbjp is against same sex unions I guess
if i become supreme court judge, i swear to god that im gonna destroy this rule and law of same sex marriage, legalization of adultry, and all otrher such rules acts asnd laws which are against nature created by the creator of humankind and universe...i would rule as a crime for those who go against nature. (A Man is Made for Women, and through women he should get his child via sexual intimacy and not by a Mam to Mam... its Haraam and Kufr if anyone is muslim seeing my comment , you better understand it Inshallah. ) indeed my lords justice and mercy empasses all worldly courts and justices done by so called judges..indeed my Rab Allah is all knowing and most mercifull.
i will rule a law or a judgement that who ever involves in unnatural sex (LGBTQ) are going against law of nature and transgressed themself will be forgiven once and if repeats same that person shall have death penalty.
OUR INDIAN CONSTITUTION OBEYS NATURE RULES AND LAWS TOO..Sadely this has been forgetten or kept aside.
now dont say whats wrong in unnatural se , or lgbtq or same sae homosexual sex marriages and all.... in fact this has created a lot of cultural demise and gifted lot of diseases like hiv std aids... which are one of the root cause through several dating apps like grindr tindr bumble etc etc... also these apps are to be strictly prohibited and illigalized to use over over the nation... this will save people more youth children, this also stops same sex rape and girls too...i swear im gonna rule it... pray for me so that i bevcome what i aspire for.
I totally disagree.. if court is not there to solve our problem then who is going to..?? And why they exist then ..?? You are agreeing that’s it’s a problem but you can’t give us a solution. Talking about incompetency.
He clearly states what the law is and gives a solution that the Legislature has to step in. Not sure what more do you expect a Judge to do?
basically what he's saying is that only the parliament can amend the special marriage act/pass a new bill for same sex marriage.....the court can only strike down unconstitutional laws for example Section 377 (rendered unconstitutional in sept 2018)
This is clearly in the hands of the parliament so we need to vote for parties that include SSM in their campaigns which i don't think any of them do unfortunately
court sustem is fucking slow and usleess like a snail
a court which couldnt propelry do justice to a rape victim which took so many yeras for ram mandir 25 yeras for mkaing a statement on dowry law what can u expect from these bodies
The word marriage as an institution cannot be passed better as taiwan passed as union of two people. Moreover the law cannot be made by SC . It's something that must be discussed in parliament and we know in India what can be the outcome.
Moreover it's not easy to passed the law , with marriage comes responsibility and there comes many more zones. I believe for this another section need to be added .
Agreed
Unless their own son or daughter is gay they won’t allow it.
Oh please, I'm gay and a lawyer and he's right
Separation of powers is a cornerstone of democracy
@@varoonnone7159 let’s not talk about democracy and discrimination of people based on their sexuality in the same sentence.
Look at the US debate, they have question how to define a woman? No expert in USA has ever defined it. No wonder then,
This brainwash Concept of same-sex marriage is percolating from USA madness.
Any creature or evolved species have desires and attraction for their opposite sex and there is a natural reason why, that is procreation. This is not offense against minority. And what would gay people achieve after enactment of this law?
What difference will it make if enacted ? Their justification need to be heard before proceeding to any Madness.
It is a movement - like government supplies in Needles to drug- addicts in the name of saving their lives.
@@varoonnone7159It's important to remember that being a lawyer or gay doesn't automatically mean someone is saying something sensible. Society or courts allows sex but doesn't allow certain people to marry, which doesn't make sense. We often need the law to enforce societal norms, such as in the case of marital rape being ruled by the court, despite society not initially accepting its existence.
@@varoonnone7159 dont feel proud of yourself for going against the law of nature... thats haraam and indeed Allah is the best justice giver or judge... your bullshit laws wont be available for longer... those who have transgressed against themself by claiming Gay, LGBTQ or indulged in same sex... you guys are gonna pay for sure..the only solution for this is early marriage at the age of 18-21... and those who want to sin or crime going against law of nature by having sex with same gender (applies also for girls with girls ) you will be punished untill death ... i swear i will judge this law if i become country supreme court judge.... 2 optionals to be given accept and obey lead by law of nature which drives our constitution in some cases of Humankind.. or go against and crime for which criminals are hanged till death or beheaded as similar as what kingdom of saudi arabia does.
Shame!
You’re none but the Chief Justice of a NATION.
What an UTTER shame it is to hear this from him who advocates RIGHTS of The people!
establishing a law doesn't come under the jurisdiction of SC.
When a gay man marries a woman, it's not just his life but also the woman's life would be ruined. Same thing for lesbian woman and a straight man.
But people do get marry Bcoz of family pressure and societal norms.
Legalising is the only option
What about children future if they get children adopted or conceived with artificial method? Will children future is not at stake?
@@user-ju1fm8rn1g how can you say children future at stake, do you have any sense?
There are so many orphans need a home, what if they adopt a child?
OK fine no child adoption.
If you talk about artificial methods, only women can do that, single men can't go for surrogacy as per laws right now.
U are concerning about the things that doesn't even exists
@@Vinod-yn2uq what if children did like homosexual parents? Every child has right to have normal parents
Don't question how you can say normal, you have eat from mouth only that is normal, not from something else
@@user-ju1fm8rn1g I believe u mean didn't like (u wrote did like).
Ask a homeless child starving for food on road side, will he think about what his parents were? Or he looks for survival? Basic needs getting fulfilled?
And as per law, gay couple aren't allowed to adopt a child, even single man cannot adopt a child till certain age.
No one talking about adoption in the first place.
Queer people asking for legal recognition for their day to day works like opening a bank account, or signing for his partner surgery at a hospital etc..
And coming to normal..
What exactly this society goes with is not normal, what do you believe is normal changes with time.
Monarchy was normal, do you want to have a king rule u now? Will you accept it?
If u talk about natural norms..!
Even having a specs for eye sight is not natural it's artificial, do you want to ban specs and people to go blind and suffer?
As per your kind information, even animal kingdom do possess same sex activities..
Who do you think have taught them?
Natural evolution is not bound by U or Ur so called normal laws..
U have pure disgust at homosexual people, I can feel that.
But Ur opinion shouldn't come at what happens in my personal life so for homosexual people.
And it's not a mental condition and it's proven.
Just imagine a scenario where u are forced to sleep and have romance with Ur same gender person..,
How do you feel about it?
Disgusting right?
Same goes for homosexuals, they feel disgusted at having sex with opposite sex.
U can't control someone's life for Ur conservative opinions and so called societal norms.
Can you define normal?
But the question is Right to Love and Right to association family is considered fundamental rights. And courts can't simply be in denial that its the duty of parliament. The thing that court should have done is to direct the Government to pass law on marriage equality. If country like Nepal can do. Why can't India?
Because Country like India having the diversity far more than Amazon forest and largest population in the world having different geographical regions can't be compared with a small country like Nepal that doesn't have diversity as great as India does.
I've had so much hope when he got elected! Atleast he tried!
Separation of Powers is important
Courts don't make laws
@@varoonnone7159 I do agree but by the time the parliament decides, another 20 years of my life would be gone! I ask I'm paying taxes just like other citizens why is the govt discriminating against me?
Country is not only run by the tax paid by you, think of tax payers who are also haveing right to protect their future generations
Make some sensible arguments.
@@vk03k is the United states not able to protect their future generations? What are you talking about? Have some sense! Straight people won't turn gay just because gay people have the right to marry!
Just live ur life, u can live in living relationship. It will take time.
Neet ke मामले में तो आपने ये भ्रष्ट सरकार के सामने घुटने टेक दिए 1% भी न्याय नही मिला और यहां पे कानून सीखा रहे हैं shame on u all whole judgment system . Aapne bhi ye prove kr Diya ki India me kabhi kisi ko justice nhi mil skti hh
dotn just blame judiciary, grow up
@@live_smilingtoo it is not just blaming it is fault and failure of whole system . injustice hua h to bolege hi . 2 sal se din rat ek karke pdha hu 2 sal se nn koe match nn koe movie nn koe party continue 2 sal ghar se bhar rhe mesh ghatiya khana khaye aur bhi bahut sacrifice kiye aur neet me score kiye 635 but college nhi mil rha hhh iss ghtiya system k bajah se to kaun responsible hhh . Dusre gyan Dena bahut easy hota HH jb tumhare sath aisa hoga us din pta chalega
Same story.I went through same pain .still trying to recover.. nothing to expect from this man. He is incompetent to take bold decisions against the government.On top of everything we have reservations every where which is bound to increase with time and very soon extend to private sector as well. He is good for giving scripted speeches in public forums only
Jaise hindu marriage act hai waise hi LGBTQ marriage act banaye...usme LGBTQ marriage ke rule banaye jaise hindu marriage act Mai hotey hai..
Very well articulated by the CJI. Court merely cannot create a new law.
Don't make this a small issue sir, it's about the life of thousands queer folks in India, you are saying "you can't come court for every issue and that court should draw the line" when no one is supporting the minority people in a country, its the court duty to work on, and it's not a small issue it's a big issue, it's the right to choose a life, which judiciary can not just ignore, during 2018 judgement it's the judiciary which took first step to remove the taboo from society, if not judiciary do you think parliament would do anything about that till today? The answer is no and the parliament won't do about same sex marriage in future also, the Indian society won't change and queer people will have to forcefully marry someone because of the societal pressure! Don't you think these things are happening now! Every queer people in village small town are getting pressurized to marry, they don't have any other options, they literally don't have any other options and it's a big issue it's a huge damn big issue acknowledge it.
Make that millions. Even if only 1 percent of Indians are gay. That's still 14 million people.
About 7 percent of Americans consider themselves to be other than heterosexual. It is likely India has a similar count, which skyrockets this number to 96 million people or 9.6 crore.
So what about future of children bin that family?
@@thomascromwell6840sorry no 55 % of American are gays, 45 % are lisbans 😂😂 no heterosexual 😂😂
Exactly! Politics has a huge role to play in this judgement. We will be fools to think otherwise. He absolutely could give rights but chose not too.
This is just small issue
If the court won't listen to the Public, who will? He also knows that the government these days works on matters that will give them the majority of votes to ensure getting re-elected. Who will speak for communities whose votes will not make much of a difference.
They just don't wanna piss off the ruling conservative party.
So why they didn't do this during 10 years of congress rule? Who was stopping them? Isn't the most secular party congress support 4 wife for muslim men even now? So much for secularism.😂😂
@partps25 then why did they remove electoral bonds ...which bjp loved dearly
Marriage is a contract between a couple and people of the area. if the people of area are not ready for such marraiges why should be legalise it. Also CJI is right this is under the realm of Parliament. When people deem to find this acceptable they will enact a law.
@@chiluxr250Marriage is a civil contract between a man and a woman to legitimise the children born out of their union and give inheritence right to said children. So same sex couples dont come under the ambit of marriage and society has nothing to do with it...
I'm a gay man and a lawyer
I understand the court's judgement
Parliament makes laws not the court
It's just his excuse to appease the government. He is a loyal bhakt who wouldn't bring any such law in India without the government's approval. He pretends to crack down on cases so that he stays in a balance but is weak enough to not take a stand of bold issues. He is the CJ who feels he can say anything in other cases where he feels so strongly but doesn't want to in cases where he simply can't relate with the idea because he hasn't lived through the injustice people in the community are subjected to everyday.
First give a horrible judgement and then defend it
Lmao he doesn’t need to. The honourable Supreme Court’s judgements require no defence
@@fawaaza.7743 and that's the problem
@@fawaaza.7743he's not God
If India is a secular country, then how was the minority and majority decided - on what basis?...
Where is fundamental rights of Hindus?
Why should secular govt run only Hindu Temples?
Hindu society feel cheated in secular India.
In India, secularism and justice equality means oppression of majority Sanatan and promotion of abrahmic religions.
Free Hindu Temples from govt
Allow gurukul shiksha..RTE..
Remove places of worship act.
Sambantha pundaye illama ennada ithu comment uh.
Why government controls temples? You need to ask the state of Gujarat they control the Temples in their state.
I am a Hindu and I want the government to control the temple, otherwise it will go under the control of hooligans and a certain community who discriminate other Hindus. Example is Chidambaram Temple which is not controlled by the government, in which we can see and hear day to day discrimination on devotees by those who are managing the temple.
Abolish the discrimination within the Hindu religion before asking for freeing the temples.
Temple money is not a big source of revenue for nation,comparing to others, its wealth need to be freed. And cong or bjp whoever is in power have to do it.
@@AjithKumar-ih6szwell we can atleast stop religious conversions and convert people into our faith if we have that money.
@@rohma220that's why temple money should not be snatched away by government, it doesn't make sense to take away the money which is miniscule to the government but it means a lot to hindus. Hindus donate hard earned money for what?? All money donated by hindus should only be spent for upliftment of Hindus.
Useless people following colonial (british and islamic) rules instead od Indian history. Shame in him
no need for the big words.....couldn'r even give justice to thousands of neet aspirants.
Rahane do.. We all know how we Indians behave. What laws we follow.. How much law abiding we are... How much we respect our country and its people and it's law... Infact u, me. And everyone knows this... Don't give this law lecture to us...
The CJI copying his posture😂
I find the body language of the interviewer outrageous. He is forgetting that he is interviewing the Chief Justice of India. I believe that the CJI is being very tolerant to such behaviour.
Lol they treat everyone the same in England. They have to do their job or get ousted like sunak. It isnt like india where older means better(which is untrue and india is still backwards and still breeding irresponsibly despite knowing otherwise for example) or have to bow down to them because of class or caste system like india. Even women are treated the same and the native men arent sexist like indians
Tolerant to what? He consented to it. He’s the CJI, nobody owes him any kind of respect outside the court. It’s your choice to do so and if somebody doesn’t want to, then it’s their choice. If one isn’t treated equally, then neither can one be criticised on an equal ground. The entire issue with the Supreme Court is that people can’t criticise because of some misplaced sense of god only knows what respect. Please everybody knows that the Hon. Mr. Chandrachud is only there because of his daddy dearest
He spoke a whole bunch of nothing. Closing his statement by blaming society. Dude you have the power to bring the change in society. Indian supreme court is only interested in petty cases of bail to criminal, husband beat wife, industrialist visa approval for london; they have no interest in bringing any fundamental change.
I'm a gay man and a lawyer and the CJI is absolutely right
Separation of Powers is a cornerstone of democracy
It's not up to courts to make laws
Blaming society is absolutely correct because laws are made by Parliament.
And Parliament is - selected by the people, for the people, as per the democratic principles.
Courts can't do nothing in this other than follow it.
The society and its culture reigns supreme always. Courts are just another govt office, nothing more.
@@ajaykumarsingh702oh yeah? Then why decriminalise 377 even? So bhi bc society pe chodh dete? Society who wants to see gays crucified.. all you guys are so full of bullshit!
Also our father purchased 1 plot from the company, on 13/09/2007 the company also issued a "lease and purchase deed" in which it is written "10 years non-assignment to anyone" Our father's lease term is 10 years on 06/01/2010 while still in Hawaii. Will written, (for daughter) will not registered, mentioned by stempeter, what are the grounds in law (our father died on 08/04/2018)
Let us know how we should proceed please help me 🙏
Why are we concerned about stupid western style politics? How about we focus on developing India’s infrastructure and economy instead of disgusting irrelevant issues like this 🤡
Why is the Indian parliament opposed to same-sex marraige? This is not the fault of the Supreme court.
Our parliament indirectly run by RSS. May be there are two causes
1) Same sex marriage will destroy patriarchal
2) They don't get orgasm in Same Sex
They "believe" that lgbtq things are against Indian culture.
As a gay Indian these are the following reasons:-
1) India still doesn't has a uniform civil code, basically there are personal laws regarding marriage, divorce etc for different communities like hindu personal law(for hindu, Buddhist,sikh,jain,parsi) muslim person law and Christian personal law. Dissolving these laws and replacing it with UCC would've been the first step to marriage equality and it was also in BJP(ruling party)'s manifesto but due to opposition consolidating muslim votes and dividing Hindus on caste based reservation benefits, they opposed it and now BJP doesn't has a clear majority so enacting it will be difficult.
2) CJI chandrachud was in favour of legalization of same sex unions but it was ruled out by 3-2 majority last year in October, they said this will effect essentially all laws regarding domestic violence as well as rapes because in india rape is only defined as crime done by man against woman, a man can't be recognised as raped legally and for that the legislature would have to step in judiciary alone can't do it.
3) some judges and a percentage of India's population is homophobic and half of rural india doesn't even understand this concept.
@@ambarpal70pal2 sa me se x marriage should never be allowed and will never be allowed.
@@No_Justicesecond point is exactly true, In other words we say like this "they just feel disgusting" so, we will not allow
Who is this oversmart host!! Seems more intelligent and experienced than CJI
Uncle was enjoying troubling others... He is at big position... He can do many things if he wants... Inko sirf time pass karna hai... What's the use of his education and authority... Anyway.. God bless us all... And soon things will be better....
He's just an interpreter of law not a law maker. He doesn't have the power to do so.
He should be removed from his post . I am totally against him after the neet justification in court
but then the security of theose who like and hte way the family nauxiously treats ass absolute taboo has to be adheared t obe realised to be protected by the absolute authority called court as is its a phobia....even sex is
just cause of the constructive factorial..... the improvisive factorial and the non participatory of teh parliamentary factorial cause of which the event of contextual approach and what human a saturated no. do cause its just not in their bookss of cornered contextuals have to be reconned with hte thing outside the box affects teh inns of the box.....apparantly nothing has changed other than the titlement fo the top....and majority museamization
You rathet explain marrige not sex.
Same sex marriages will be legalised before 2027 .. Save this comment ❤ 💯🙏
Manakesukotlajenalakuvelguniyyalenenupaddakastalumaliyevarupadadukortukupote.astilasaganikannayekuvapanchukuntunnarukortukupote
Human mind is working in various ways , Which ways they get satisfaction they will forward their life through that way , Look at to encient kingdom stories even some king fallows sex with animals ,, So love and affections working in human life different ways , So as per my opinion , same sex Marrage is also correct , Lawa are making for the smooth going of the society, not to obstruct society, wishes
I noticed Prajwal, for long time, it's equality or undermining the CJI by seating position..
Prajwal Should have some respect to CJI.. or by Age or by Position...
Yes...
The book of revelation teaches the state of the earth before the end. It will never recover from this
the book of revelation says it's evil?
The majority of India is not Christian. So a book of revelation is not important here. Grow up.
@@anikethchakraborty3238 no, not particularly the revelation. But the bible with the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. And revelation just says that evil will increase at the end of the world.
Decriminalization is a matter of rights and marriage is a matter of long established privilege. Honestly there is no benefits per se for religious marriage or civil marriage in India like in Europe, its just a formality and social requirement, so its hard to argue for a case.
After my interaction with people, I came to a conclusion that gender doesn't matter at all, gentle temperament, good character and behavior is more important.
I myself got to experience triple trauma:
1.dealing with a narcissist and other mentally ill person
2.dealing with personality clash
3.dealing with other toxic behaviors
I feel like there are problems that need to be addressed like who will be married and are qualified to become parents, the issue on teenage pregnancy is also a problem...
The problems faced by our society have been brought by heterosexual people mostly..
MOST REFORMS HAVE ALSO BEEN BOUGHT BY HETROSEXUAL PEOPLE , EXCEPT THIS CENTURY ALL CENTURIES HAVE BEEN MAJORLY HETROSEXUAL , SAYING THIS JUST PROVES YOUR LEFTIST ILLOGICAL POINT OF VIEW
I had hoped for much better treatment from this CJI
Indian government system and politics is such a clowns play ..Never expect right thing from it
Pravetudandalucheyyavatipranalupotunnai.gavarnamentunumottamumunchutunnaru
Soon after the judgment against SSM, CJI Dr. Chandrachud was there in US and gave an interview in connection with SSM and the judgment. Are there no other issues apart from SSM for those who interview CJI in Oxford, Harvard or in America. There are so many burning issues which are not touched on which the CJI could have been an activist but unfortunately I seem him always speak passionately on this one topic. This is my view.
Define everything under sky as man n woman
Because everyone can be everyone 🎉
I disagree. It WAS court’s duty to protect Lgbt people from the clearly homophobic government and give them rights on urgent basis. It WAS a matter of fundamental rights and being able to live with dignity.
This cji very well knew government’s not gonna do anything for gay rights. Now he is saying humne theka nhi liya saari problems ka? Abe ja!
Why should Lgbt people suffer for decades more because you did not have balls enough to give them rights when you really could!
Phir bhi CJI bol rhe ha atleast unko civil union milna chahiye tha or woh majority judgement k favour mein bhi nhi ha toh mujhe assa lagta ha may be CJI review petition accept kre retire hone se pehle or wese bhi 3 judges toh retire ho chuke h toh uske jagah kya pta ache judge aaye🙃
Yeah absolutely the court has to protect its citizen regardless of their gender according to the law. That's what he is doing. He's clearly interpreting the law which is his duty. He's just an interpreter of law. He's not a law maker. Simply put- he can't make the law, he doesn't have the power to do so nor it's his duty and doesn't have the jurisdiction to do so. Marriage doesn't come under fundamental rights. It's under personal law and under it there's no mentioned of same sex marriage rather it clearly says husband and wife which is male and female.
Law doesn't work like a dictator, it has rules, forms and procedures to follow.
If you don't have the balls to follow, then you better stop complaining.
@@Bemmahbm CJI se jitna ho sakta ha woh kar rha ha or definitely woh review petition bhi accept kar lega akela CJI kuch bhi nhi kar sakta out of 5 3 judge agree bhi karna chahiye or yeh ek chote se bache ko bhi pta hona chahiye ki law banane ka kam sirf parliament ka sc Naya kuch law nhi bna sakti
show yourself to mental hospital
@@prajwal_kh or tere jese gawaro ka kaha Jana chahiye ? Tum log bachpan se hi itne unpad gawar the kya...jab kuch pta na ho toh bich mein gwaro ke jese bolna band kar
First they were 5 of them and then they never agreed on the cause. If they did they would have done something better for the world. Few generations will perish, till politicians if only, they will take up issues which does not concern money to be credited in their accounts, Ram Allah lullah! and Jesus. They are safe with their wife and children as so are these these judges, only the real lord can make them uncomfortable against their prejudices.
He himself isnt in the favour of the idea to accept same sex marriage, he said he wanted the cuvik unions between same sex couple to be recognised by the court which i think is just a way to come across as a liberal which he isnt, and he says the parliament would be responsible for the chanfe in law but he already knows that the members sutting in parliament would never do that out of the conservatism. The special marriage act no where specifies that the marriage is to happen between a man and a woman, no where does it mention it. A country where queerness exited and was accepted, is now even struggling to recognise it, all the conservatist and orthodox so xalled religious people, look into the religious texts and scripts, youll come to know how the civilisation was before.
Then, i think lgbtq community should forget about same sex marriage...
But my question is,If decriminalisation can be done through court then why not ssm??
Tens of thousands of cases affecting lives of tens of millions of people pending in top courts of india and the top judges are busy giving lectures on LGBT case that too in foreign university😂😂😂
Why Akshay Kumar wanted Canadian citizenship
Sir v saw many social change verdict by SC. Those are fruitful for social welfare.lgbtq community is 10% of our population means 14 crores which near to equal 4 - 5 states population. For 90% people interest v can't refuses the interest of 10 % people because its not election. Its a question of justice. No one should not punished by his gender and sexuality base. If one person against 140crore people if he is true, correct he have to get equal justice. V can't disconsider him because he is only one. Satyameva Jayathe
It should not be called same sex but same gender... marriage is not the term..it can be partnering
I thought court was a institution who was ment to work on issues of people but here court is a person who is too tired of people .......
Total support to all the bold straights out there
They unanimously said right to marry person of your own choice is not Fundamental Right! Is that also something the civil society should be "discussing"? They took the right of marry person of your own choice back, which was allowed in Lata Singh v State of U.P. judgment (if I remember correctly). Now the state governments are making anti conversion law, the UCC in Uttarakhand even adult heterosexual people to register even for live-in relationships. The Supreme Court got the lowest hanging fruit and decided to deprive on of the marginalized and vulnerable people of their right to get married, which might provide them some protection against malicious actors. They did not do complete justice.
All these words dont mean a thing.. i have traveled 10000 kms away from my home just to be myself, finally.. as the government or judiciary or people care enough
Don't have spine since 2014
Definition of equality changes with respect who it applied to. 😂
Should live stream selection criteria and judge selection as well
I understand that its a meticulous law. But there is literally no hope from the parliament. If 5 more years pass by and gay people are not given their rights, the court must give gay people their rights. It's barbaric not to.
Mam gay is not natural
Yes society takes decades or centuries to change. Parliament alone has powers to make laws.
That is what democracy is about. It has its flaws .
Bt it s nt prctcl.😎sm😮.....mdatr
It is a long standing demand raised by abva through its report"Less than gay" in 1991 & this is accessible at abva blog spot.
Sorry i ll nt😎 from tomorrow itself
Ye hijod ki fauj ne hum ko bachaya😂😂😂😂😂😂
Only thing and hope left is gay and lesbian marriage where they can live their life happily individually and also no family or societal pressure......
Plgmy
When will review petition take place before the SC?
Just because some people are gay, doesn't mean every one is.
If it is love as you say then you will be ok but if it is just lust, that you intend to justify, so sorry no.
Toh kisne kaha ki bc sab gay hain? Aur Tujhe kaun zabardasti gay bana tha hai? Aur Saale gays mein hi lust hota hai? Straights mein lustful relations nhi hote? Tujhe kaha kisne character certificate baantne ke liye? Ganwaaron se bhara pada hai desh!
God Bless Chandrachud Sir 🤍🫶🏻🤍🙏🏻🙏🏻💙💜 and GoodLuck to India/Bharat Judiciary 🇮🇳 💜🕉️✝️🙏🏻🤍
In case of male and female creatures/ organisms in animals, birds ( living on earth or under water) etc of the nature, almost all the male creatures / organisms approach (different sex creatures not the same sex creatures) ie., female creatures , from time to time, to satisfy its physiological / biological, sexual desires etc, mostly by undermining / hardly maintaining family relations.
Being humans, better not to resort to such activities / concepts of same sex marriage ( not defined & envisaged relationships there under ), which are not thought of even by the animals, birds, other creatures other than humans.
Contrary to the animal culture/ jungle law, human culture, traditions, family life, relationships and its values, ethos etc., particularly that of Bharath human society have been proved / accepted by ancestors / experts, as natural, Universal, eternal human law, with certain exceptions to that of imported / foreign toxic family dynamics imbibed by certain fanatics.
It is not clear as why the systems, in name of freedom, are hard to open Pandora’s box like same sex MARRIAGE ( relating to physiological / sexual desires which are so dynamic as that of toxic family dynamics) mostly trivial / extreme in nature ( as same sex union is not resorted to even animals, birds, other creatures - other than humans) by exhausting the precious time, resources etc., of human society, at the stake of Bharath human culture, traditions, family life, relationships and its values, ethos etc.
Further, the growth / evolution of any creatures mainly depends initially upon female creatures / organisms ( even in animals / birds etc.,) of the nature, it takes full / total responsibility to nurture, nourish its babies to certain stage of self-reliance, independent.
Same sex seems to be of the nature of cases like contract union / living together & may be falling under extremity / triviality, hardly expected, are being tried very hard to bring it under the definition of marriage, though not envisaged in the initial definition of marriage. It appears to be the outcome of certain international self proclaimed intellectuals and it seems may warrant questioning/ disputing/ litigating all the meanings / definitions of any word in any language, which is the base for any law / rule / regulation on the planets.
It appears that this may lead to different variety of grounds / relationships not defined anywhere in any scriptures / religious texts / dictionaries on any planets and may result in involving intellectuals including self proclaimed in the relevant subject / field to find new meanings to existing words, simultaneously innovate new words, deal with variety of cases etc.
Further exercise of discretion (instead arranging for framing/ formulating / enacting of unambiguous laws, rules, regulations by legislature / parliament) and interference in redefining word (s) differently from it’s standard universally accepted definition instead of interpretation, may warrant questioning/ disputing/ litigating all the meanings / definitions of any word in any language, which is the base for any law / rule / regulation on the planets. It appears that this may lead to different variety of grounds / cases in addition to the pendency.
4:26 But he is the chief justice he can override others opinions
Oo , I thought it works on majority.
Now Rahul Gandhi can bring up this unsorted recognition in the parliament . Ofcourse if he has not the fear of votes in future. Unless it is discussed can't get a solution and get implemented.
Are you that naive? What are you, 18? Uska voter base saara Muslim hai! You know what that means right?
Hope parliament act on this soon. Also as a society we have to change our mindset about these people. it's easy to laugh on others on things which they have no control of
Let them live together. It cannot be called marrage. What is marriage without the propagation the species?
Personal matters like Marriage or Divorce court should avoid interference. Such laws should be amended. One wrong Marriage destroy Life, court don't give divorce easily
I believe it's completely absurd that society frowns upon openly accepting sexual relationships, yet we have the highest population in the world. Society does not accept homosexuality or the repeal of section 370. However, it is the responsibility of the apex court to uphold human rights.
He put it so well specially about that it's just not court only to work on things but the people's society of modern democracies like Bharat needs to do things for any issue . We as people shouldn't JUST LOOK TO THE COURT FOR LITERALLY ALL ISSUES ARISING, AS A SOCIETY OF PEOPLE OF THE COUNTRIES, WE ARE RESPONSIBLE & ACCOUNTABLE TOO A LOT MUCH💯💯
I don't know why the way of sitting of the host seems not appropriate.... And even his accent seems fake
that's because you're small minded and unexposed to the world.
they are foreigners and don't know how to sit in front of elders
@@anonymouslyopinionated656 and you are not exposed to the indian values we indians do not sit like this in front of our elders
Thankfully this abomination was not approved by the Court.
What do you mean?
you are the abomination lol
Yet calling a gay CEO to setup iPhone manufacturing plant in India is not an abomination. Hypocrite hindus.
acceptance is near.
I'm Gay from Kolkata 🙂🌈