The other type of F table has one tail area per page (for example, a = 0.10 on one page, a = 0.05 on another). That's not the format I prefer. For that type, you'd use the same logic, but you have to flip between the pages. I think the table format given here is better for a number of reasons, so it's the one I use.
Thanks Joe! You are very welcome.
The other type of F table has one tail area per page (for example, a = 0.10 on one page, a = 0.05 on another). That's not the format I prefer. For that type, you'd use the same logic, but you have to flip between the pages. I think the table format given here is better for a number of reasons, so it's the one I use.
why are most tables not like that? for example the first one in google
how would i use this table?
which table is this ? i use devore tables
at :56, would this be the correct way in R to get the exact value for P(F>2.448): > df(2.448, df1=3, df2=14)
1-pf(2.448,3,14) would do it.
awesome, thank you for the quick response, teaching myself R
can you help me to get the F value for a VECM of 45 observations and 3 variables... i think it should be a (3,42) ?... 2,82 ??
u made a mistake at 5:57
df=5 is denominator, not numerator. Right?
Nope u flipped for the property :)
Ok thanks, helpful video
where can i have a table like yours ?
Sorry to say that the area we have worked out is less than .10 and greater than .025