Nazmani Bloodweaver is the culprit, not Crimson Clergy. Nerf suggestions: The "but not less than (1)" treatment Only spells +2 Mana cost Change the text to "All your spells with Charge get +1 attack"
Strongly dissagree, this deck didn't exist when clergy was still unbanned. Destroying Nazmani would be really unfair to all the other fun and less good decks out there that use/need that card. If anything clergy should get nerfed. It should cost as much as Gadgetzan Auctioneer or something. Then it would require you to use up so many more cards to reduce the cost of Clergy with Nazmani. It would still be possible to win and do the combo but it would be much more vulnerable to most top tier wild decks, especially the aggro decks. Even if i'm wrong and the deck keep on being a problem even after such a nerf, i'd rather they at least try that first than to completely destroy Nazami and the other fun decks that need it.
@@luddent7505 Nazmani is incredibly toxic mate, most of priest's bs combos are only possible because of it "but not less than (1)" would be perfectly fair and wouldn't ruin any "fun decks" (is that even something priests can achieve ?)
Saw the two cards in the thumbnail and thought this was gonna be Mark's version of the turn 5 OTK miracle priest deck EVIL hearthstone showcased recently. Pleasantly surprised to see a mechathun instead! Crazy how they just decided to unban the strongest draw engine ever created and thought it would work out okay.
I wonder how many of these crazy decks that Mark comes up with actually are viable in the meta. How many of these get a consistent 55% or higher win rate? I wish he would share some statistics on the decks after playing at least some 10 matches.
Wild is such a shitshow that basically any OTK deck can eke out a 53% WR in some little pocket meta at dad legend MMR if you get the right string of opps. I had a surprising amount of success with his mechaleaper porcupine deck from last month, even up to D8. You can't consistently beat absolute top threats but with the cumulative amount of deckbuilding brainpower churning through ideas in his discord (where most of these decks come from), a decent number of them will, in fact, be pretty decent. I mean, just consider the fact that Mark is consistently up in diamond these days. I remember the old days when he would just be down in gold or lower because his ideas were just so janky that they would never beat even a fairly optimized wild deck. I haven't seen him be below diamond in months.
@@svfrey7 The reason Mark is in Diamond recently is because of the plague of bots at lower ranks. Not because his decks naturally climbed him there. IIRC he uses Demon Seed to climb past the bots and then starts to meme around. These days, Diamond is the new Silver because that's the lowest MMR real players.
And Wild will finally become the same castrated and cut-down mode as Standard. Everyone loves Wild because you could play old, unnerfed cards in it. But because of the whiners on Reddit, Wild now only has Aggro and Seed Warlock. However, there are also a lot of complaints about the latter. Next in line is Seed Warlock. And Aggro Priests and Reno Priests will remain in the meta, apparently.
Radiant Elemental died for this! Remember to subscribe to the channel and like the video! Thanks so much for watching!
Mark, they invite you to present new expansion decks and you still make em dirty.
Great job!
Nazmani Bloodweaver is the culprit, not Crimson Clergy.
Nerf suggestions:
The "but not less than (1)" treatment
Only spells
+2 Mana cost
Change the text to "All your spells with Charge get +1 attack"
+2 mana cost would change pretty much nothing, the goal is the rez it anyway
Last suggestion sounds legit
Strongly dissagree, this deck didn't exist when clergy was still unbanned. Destroying Nazmani would be really unfair to all the other fun and less good decks out there that use/need that card. If anything clergy should get nerfed. It should cost as much as Gadgetzan Auctioneer or something. Then it would require you to use up so many more cards to reduce the cost of Clergy with Nazmani. It would still be possible to win and do the combo but it would be much more vulnerable to most top tier wild decks, especially the aggro decks. Even if i'm wrong and the deck keep on being a problem even after such a nerf, i'd rather they at least try that first than to completely destroy Nazami and the other fun decks that need it.
@@luddent7505 Nazmani is incredibly toxic mate, most of priest's bs combos are only possible because of it
"but not less than (1)" would be perfectly fair and wouldn't ruin any "fun decks" (is that even something priests can achieve ?)
Nerf what? You suggest to nerf tier 1million deck?
Nice to see how right after Mark uploads a video, everyone I play against is using the same deck
Saw the two cards in the thumbnail and thought this was gonna be Mark's version of the turn 5 OTK miracle priest deck EVIL hearthstone showcased recently. Pleasantly surprised to see a mechathun instead!
Crazy how they just decided to unban the strongest draw engine ever created and thought it would work out okay.
Did it not turn out okay...? No deck that uses it is tier 1
Drown away your sorrows with rapid fire game ending combo
I wonder how many of these crazy decks that Mark comes up with actually are viable in the meta. How many of these get a consistent 55% or higher win rate? I wish he would share some statistics on the decks after playing at least some 10 matches.
Wild is such a shitshow that basically any OTK deck can eke out a 53% WR in some little pocket meta at dad legend MMR if you get the right string of opps. I had a surprising amount of success with his mechaleaper porcupine deck from last month, even up to D8. You can't consistently beat absolute top threats but with the cumulative amount of deckbuilding brainpower churning through ideas in his discord (where most of these decks come from), a decent number of them will, in fact, be pretty decent.
I mean, just consider the fact that Mark is consistently up in diamond these days. I remember the old days when he would just be down in gold or lower because his ideas were just so janky that they would never beat even a fairly optimized wild deck. I haven't seen him be below diamond in months.
Mark’s MMR is terrible. His win rate doesn’t mean anything
@@svfrey7 The reason Mark is in Diamond recently is because of the plague of bots at lower ranks. Not because his decks naturally climbed him there. IIRC he uses Demon Seed to climb past the bots and then starts to meme around.
These days, Diamond is the new Silver because that's the lowest MMR real players.
currently editing that too
I've put way more tutors in the deck tho
my most favorite deck of all time
Worth to climb up in rankeds ?
4:32 He still has cards in hand. Why does it work?
Whirlpool destroys ALL copies
whirlpool. it destroys the board and all copies of the destroyed cards
>(wherever they are)
Fantastic!
You should gain 2 stars from double c'thun since you win the game twice and the opponent should loose 2 stars since he looses twice haha
They might need to ban Crimson Clergy again.
the 4 dislikes are from the people who lost
This deck is so difficult to play... not enough time to play
Oh dear...
Good
The biggest punishment for thanos would be being forced to play wild for eternity
Good thing they nerfed radiant elemental
No more mana cheat in Priest right guys?...
maybe its time to slap "once per turn" on these problematic cards
This is very close to the deck that got the card banned in the first place >.>
next they will nerf nazmani
And Wild will finally become the same castrated and cut-down mode as Standard. Everyone loves Wild because you could play old, unnerfed cards in it. But because of the whiners on Reddit, Wild now only has Aggro and Seed Warlock. However, there are also a lot of complaints about the latter. Next in line is Seed Warlock. And Aggro Priests and Reno Priests will remain in the meta, apparently.
@@allendeednella dont talk me about it the fucking nerfed sorc
@@allendeednella Agree,wild will be boring. Everyone will go to play world of warcraft and diablo 4
It’s actually not that strong.
Why?
Not a Markmckz enjoyer I see.
I just got wrecked by this deck 4 times this morning with no counterplay. It is extremely consistent.
@@vinicius______________________ it must be very weak against aggro shit
i played this deck vs my mccthun warrior i got there faster xd
Overheal should apply once per turn
So next we're nerfing nazmani to "after you play a spell, reduce the cost of a card in your hand by (1), but not less than (1)"?
No. Nazmani without radiant is trash