I think a cool idea would be to sometimes instead ask "how many X to kill Y?" For instance: how many helbats to kill 40 ultralisks? In that scenario just keep spawning helbats so there is always exactly 100 or something on the map, coming from the same direction and have a counter of how many helbats died and how many in total attacked an ultra.
Roach corpses getting flung in the air is funny. Just imagine seeing a zergling brutally murder a roach and it throws the corpse like 10 meters high, that would be wild
On that note, itd be interesting if they could get their hands on deepmind for this. Instead of just having armies smashing into each other thered be some micro beyond human capability that would make it that much cooler to watch!
bumping up my original request of: 100 banes vs 100 banes Up to 200 banes vs 200 banes. ~~what can i say i just like watching fireworks~~ love the vids!
Okay this is honestly going to be an interesting one. On paper, this should end in a draw with all units lost, but I do wonder how big of a difference each win would be if the battle was repeated like 10 times or more
@tya you should ruin everyone's predictions and engineer a fight where both sides die :) If the marine got off one more hit while the missiles were in the air, it would have been a double KO
I got that one right, since roaches are known to not scale well with upgrades as compared to most units. which leads to the question how the same duel would go without any upgrades.
@@draegonspawn5361 err... no I watched that video, he disabled the cloaking on the ghosts or never turned it on, as multiplayer ghosts don't get free cloaking like they do in WoL
5/5 adept tankier and bonus dmg vs reapers, immortals destroy anything armored for cost, banshee shreds low hp marines, hellbats pathetic against non-light, roach not enough range and dps to stop zerglings.
![Quando Rondo - Life Goes On [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eIf3fhMXAow/mqdefault.jpg)
I think a cool idea would be to sometimes instead ask "how many X to kill Y?"
For instance: how many helbats to kill 40 ultralisks?
In that scenario just keep spawning helbats so there is always exactly 100 or something on the map, coming from the same direction and have a counter of how many helbats died and how many in total attacked an ultra.
If this series has taught me anything it's that Immortals are absurd.
Well, they are called immortals for a reason
Immortals have great stats, so with less micro of course they beat a lot of things. They're a hard counter to many armored units for a reason.
If it's armored, and it doesn't fly, Immortal counters it, pretty much.
@@MrGeorgeFlorcus is it? i would argue that at certain amounts the siege tank would still beat the immortal
@@Nuurix that’s because of range, nothing else.
Roach corpses getting flung in the air is funny. Just imagine seeing a zergling brutally murder a roach and it throws the corpse like 10 meters high, that would be wild
Stalkers to too well in these clips bc they’re the only units that the AI’s micro is good.
On that note, itd be interesting if they could get their hands on deepmind for this. Instead of just having armies smashing into each other thered be some micro beyond human capability that would make it that much cooler to watch!
@@apathicuss7439 you mean alpha star?
@@Dadbod007 ahh yeah i do! last i knew it was just called deep mind
@@apathicuss7439 that would be awesome! I thought the program/project was called deepmind and specific AI used playing StarCraft was alpha star?
@@apathicuss7439 Automaton 6000 and micro A.I. are pretty good at that! Unfortunately, their creators have gone silent as far as I know.
Immortals are king of ground vs ground as long as their supply is the same.
I think that title belongs to siege tanks
disruptors? tanks? lurkers? marines?
@@ilikekspwaytoomuch4691 Max marines with perfect micro can't take on full supply of Immortals, I've tested.
They lose to both tanks and lurkers in huge supplies. Everything loses to tanks.
@@Flawskiii did you even out the upgrades, tested when equal supply or equal cost? Did you add medevacs? Also you probably didnt perfectly micro them.
I'll admit, I didn't expect the Immortals to come out on top there.
Never bet against Immortals
Have you improved the AI of zerglings? Their wrap around seemed much better
Its more zealots derping with charge and ultras being goody
bumping up my original request of: 100 banes vs 100 banes
Up to 200 banes vs 200 banes.
~~what can i say i just like watching fireworks~~
love the vids!
Okay this is honestly going to be an interesting one. On paper, this should end in a draw with all units lost, but I do wonder how big of a difference each win would be if the battle was repeated like 10 times or more
Spectre vs Immortal
Diamondbacks vs Brutalisk or Omegalisk
Hellbat vs Firebat
Good to see some smaller unit battles, these actually have some use in ladder play lol
You've been really active recently. Love it.
Yes!!! Got 'em all right for once. That Ling vs Roach one was silly though.... 600 of them?! Was that outcome ever in doubt?
@tya you should ruin everyone's predictions and engineer a fight where both sides die :) If the marine got off one more hit while the missiles were in the air, it would have been a double KO
I was right about everything except zerglings vs roaches, so I'm chuffed.
I got that one right, since roaches are known to not scale well with upgrades as compared to most units. which leads to the question how the same duel would go without any upgrades.
If the roachs burrows when low health, they may win
no, that would guarantee a win as the lings have no detection
Then put 1 overseer.
During his tests, stealth never seems to work. DT and Ghost have lost handily to things that don't even have detection. Like ghosts vs. muta.
@@draegonspawn5361 err... no I watched that video, he disabled the cloaking on the ghosts or never turned it on, as multiplayer ghosts don't get free cloaking like they do in WoL
The fact that I average maybe 60/40 on these bothers me more than it should.
Stalkers said: forever sleep
then they all die.
Omegalisk vs Brutalisk?
roaches sound so cute when they die.
3/5 right. Was wrong about Banshee and Ultralisks
Finnaly did a 5/5, but it was pure logic expept for banshee.
For some reason reaper are good at killing structures
WoL player moment
that was changed very long ago... xD
@@shadowwarrior1003 am I old then aaaaAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAaaa
For the first one, Reaper outranges adept. So it’s possible for reaper to beat adepts
Believed it or not, got only the Banshee wrong lol
Track name plz?
despite of stupid Al macro, but i can't stop watching it. Why???
Капец, только баньшу против мариков угадал(
got 2 wrong :( i picked reapers and roaches XD
lotsa Lings vs. Immortals...I wnna see em lose for once also the Void Rays vs. a lotta Mutas
Nobody has 400 hellbats.
5/5, nice
wow immortals are one of the few that can aftually beat blink micro stalkers???
whyyyy? Bats could win that fight, they really could, rematch! Split the army in two fronts and the ultras are done!
5/5
adept tankier and bonus dmg vs reapers, immortals destroy anything armored for cost, banshee shreds low hp marines, hellbats pathetic against non-light, roach not enough range and dps to stop zerglings.
I got 4/5
Ultralisk is unstoppable
Against ground units only.
Awesome 🤩🤩
5/5
4/5
4/4
오늘은 좀 쉬웠다 3개나 맞혔음
4/5 right and I dont even play sc2
Me encantan tus videos uwu
The music sucks.
Boring … I predicted every outcome correct 🤣 … okay more videos pls
Ok! Now go back to your boy, artosis.