Yes, it’s striking how both situations involve extreme challenges for pilots. While my simulation focused on engine power control, today’s tragic accident shows how unpredictable aviation can be.
When taking off from the ground, the vibrations from the ground are well represented, but the vibrations in the sky look like a person shaking in the cockpit, which is disconcerting.
Thanks for the comment! The shaking was due to real-world weather conditions with turbulence and strong winds, which made the flight more challenging and realistic.
This is what happened in South Korea? Is there the box with the 3 T-handles to pull the cables to gravity drop the landing gear? Seems like they came in hot without flaps as well. Must have been total hydraulic failure as well. Must have been total hydraulic failure as well. Would you dump fuel to avoid a fire ball? Request runway to be foamed to reduce spark chance? Request a runway that did not have a wall built at the end?
You bring up some great points. The tragedy that occurred today in South Korea, where the aircraft crashed into a wall at the end of the runway, really highlights the importance of understanding the extreme challenges pilots face in critical situations. In the case of my simulation, with no hydraulics and no flaps, controlling the aircraft solely with engine power was already a huge challenge, especially under turbulence and high winds. However, when you add the complexity of real-world conditions like the wall at the end of the runway and the immediate risks of fire or further damage, it becomes clear how much higher the stakes are. In such a scenario, pilots must act fast and make life-or-death decisions, just like the ones you've mentioned: dumping fuel to avoid a fireball, requesting runway foam to reduce spark risks, and ensuring the runway is clear of obstacles. It’s heartbreaking to see such an accident, and it reminds us how unpredictable aviation can be. Despite all the training and preparation, accidents still happen, which is why ongoing training and attention to safety are crucial for everyone involved in aviation. .In a simulation, we’re able to practice these scenarios, but real-life situations have much more at stake. Thank you for your insightful questions and for emphasizing the importance of proper procedures. Every detail counts, and training for emergencies is vital to handling the unexpected
The hydraulics to control the plane are fine mostly . Another angle you can Cleary aee they have full control authority over the aircraft, The pilot lined up perfectly center line, but unfortunately they encountered ground effect and didn't touch down until it was halfway down the runway. Went straight into the ILS embankment thing....now the azerbaijan airlines plane that was total hydraulic failure , from flight tracking and videos , you can cleary see they where flying with only the engines......This Korean crash , i think alot of it was human error. Maybe after there first go around, they forgot to extend the flaps and gear for their 2nd approach to land. And even if the landing gear was a issue the pilots failed to extend them manually. They came in way to fast. The other engine seemed to be working fine. They could have stayed longer in the air with one engine to figure out a plan. Honestly I think the pilots could have been fatigued, and panicked to get it down fast. And they died.... And also the ILS system has no reason to be onto of a solid obstacle 100-200feet off the end of the airfield
@@Thetalinshow Thank you for your detailed thoughts. It's true that human error can be a factor in many aviation incidents, and it's something that needs to be carefully analyzed. Regarding this particular accident, it's important to remember that every situation is complex, with many variables at play. The pilots were likely under intense pressure, making decisions in extreme conditions. While training and experience play a huge role, sometimes even the best pilots face circumstances that are outside of their control. The role of fatigue, stress, and rapid decision-making cannot be underestimated. As for the ILS system, it’s a valid point that the safety of the runway and surrounding obstacles is critical. In the end, each accident serves as a learning opportunity for the aviation community to improve safety and procedures.
@Fly737 overall poor airport design is a major factor. The ILS antennas are normally designed to breakaway if a airplane skids off the runway. Having a structure at the end of the runway is kinda crazy. Hopefully when eveything the wreck is cleared up and they rebuild the ILS ? They remove that whole structure
@@Thetalinshow You're absolutely right, airport design is a critical factor. The placement of fixed structures like the ILS antennas near the runway end is concerning and should be re-evaluated. Hopefully, this tragedy leads to changes that enhance safety and prevent future incidents.
Crazy to simulate this just a day before a 737 crash in possibly this same scenario 😢
@@alexcross3286 Too much has happened in just one week😢
This is strangely coincidental to Jeju crash 😮
Yes, it’s striking how both situations involve extreme challenges for pilots. While my simulation focused on engine power control, today’s tragic accident shows how unpredictable aviation can be.
When taking off from the ground, the vibrations from the ground are well represented, but the vibrations in the sky look like a person shaking in the cockpit, which is disconcerting.
Thanks for the comment! The shaking was due to real-world weather conditions with turbulence and strong winds, which made the flight more challenging and realistic.
This is what happened in South Korea? Is there the box with the 3 T-handles to pull the cables to gravity drop the landing gear? Seems like they came in hot without flaps as well. Must have been total hydraulic failure as well. Must have been total hydraulic failure as well. Would you dump fuel to avoid a fire ball? Request runway to be foamed to reduce spark chance? Request a runway that did not have a wall built at the end?
You bring up some great points. The tragedy that occurred today in South Korea, where the aircraft crashed into a wall at the end of the runway, really highlights the importance of understanding the extreme challenges pilots face in critical situations. In the case of my simulation, with no hydraulics and no flaps, controlling the aircraft solely with engine power was already a huge challenge, especially under turbulence and high winds.
However, when you add the complexity of real-world conditions like the wall at the end of the runway and the immediate risks of fire or further damage, it becomes clear how much higher the stakes are. In such a scenario, pilots must act fast and make life-or-death decisions, just like the ones you've mentioned: dumping fuel to avoid a fireball, requesting runway foam to reduce spark risks, and ensuring the runway is clear of obstacles.
It’s heartbreaking to see such an accident, and it reminds us how unpredictable aviation can be. Despite all the training and preparation, accidents still happen, which is why ongoing training and attention to safety are crucial for everyone involved in aviation.
.In a simulation, we’re able to practice these scenarios, but real-life situations have much more at stake. Thank you for your insightful questions and for emphasizing the importance of proper procedures. Every detail counts, and training for emergencies is vital to handling the unexpected
The hydraulics to control the plane are fine mostly . Another angle you can Cleary aee they have full control authority over the aircraft, The pilot lined up perfectly center line, but unfortunately they encountered ground effect and didn't touch down until it was halfway down the runway. Went straight into the ILS embankment thing....now the azerbaijan airlines plane that was total hydraulic failure , from flight tracking and videos , you can cleary see they where flying with only the engines......This Korean crash , i think alot of it was human error. Maybe after there first go around, they forgot to extend the flaps and gear for their 2nd approach to land. And even if the landing gear was a issue the pilots failed to extend them manually. They came in way to fast. The other engine seemed to be working fine. They could have stayed longer in the air with one engine to figure out a plan. Honestly I think the pilots could have been fatigued, and panicked to get it down fast. And they died.... And also the ILS system has no reason to be onto of a solid obstacle 100-200feet off the end of the airfield
@@Thetalinshow Thank you for your detailed thoughts. It's true that human error can be a factor in many aviation incidents, and it's something that needs to be carefully analyzed. Regarding this particular accident, it's important to remember that every situation is complex, with many variables at play. The pilots were likely under intense pressure, making decisions in extreme conditions.
While training and experience play a huge role, sometimes even the best pilots face circumstances that are outside of their control. The role of fatigue, stress, and rapid decision-making cannot be underestimated. As for the ILS system, it’s a valid point that the safety of the runway and surrounding obstacles is critical.
In the end, each accident serves as a learning opportunity for the aviation community to improve safety and procedures.
@Fly737 overall poor airport design is a major factor. The ILS antennas are normally designed to breakaway if a airplane skids off the runway. Having a structure at the end of the runway is kinda crazy. Hopefully when eveything the wreck is cleared up and they rebuild the ILS ? They remove that whole structure
@@Thetalinshow You're absolutely right, airport design is a critical factor. The placement of fixed structures like the ILS antennas near the runway end is concerning and should be re-evaluated. Hopefully, this tragedy leads to changes that enhance safety and prevent future incidents.