Did the Galaxy S24 Ultra Just Beat the iPhone 15 Pro Max in 4K Video Rendering!? Ultimate Speed Test
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 июн 2024
- I've decided to do again another back to back 4K rendering compression speed test between both the Galaxy S24 Ultra and the iPhone 15 Pro Max. I will be using Lumafusion, Adobe Rush, Filmora, and InShot as my testing tools.
Introduction and Test Overview (0:00)
Lumafusion 4K Video Render (0:35)
Filmora 4K Video Render (2:08)
Adobe Rush 4K Video Render (3:30)
InShot 4K Video Render (4:37)
Conclusion (5:43)
#galaxys24ultra #iphone15promax #4kvideo #lumafusion #adoberush #filmora #inshot #1080p 
Наука
Check out how the s24 ultra and iPhone 15 Pro Max does in a side by side gaming test:
ruclips.net/video/C6It50rqPhU/видео.htmlsi=cIu_X3YrzTvt49kt
Kudos to Dame for giving android fans happiness from the title of the video. It must not have lasted for long but still I appreciate it ❤
Haha now let's try app launch speeds , s23ultra (not s24u) does it faster than iphone
S24u needs 3rd party apps to optimise for it , the phone just launched. Every phone launches with beta software nowadays..
s24u just released, cope more bruh
@@wheely4405Yeah it’s weird actually. I did some research on it and figured out it’s almost entirely animation-based. The iPhone is more powerful but Samsung’s OneUI animations are better for pure speed, it begins loading the content the moment your finger touches the app, and the animations are super snappy. The iPhone does a smooth, showy animation, and then once the app is full screen, it loads the content.
I’ve actually sent in a request to Apple to give us animation control.
@@wheely4405mf thinks its 2010 💀
@mohthenics nahh , optimisation and speed is generally better on older phones. For example s23u runs warzone better than s24u does , watch latest dame tech video.
Only after developers of the game optimise the game for the new phone it will surpass the performance of the old and I know it will surpass because benchmarks never lie.
And it's only about time .. depends on the developers
i say apple should focus research on better cooling if they manage do that and slap their m chip on phone then that would be something awesome
iPhone 16 pro max
6.9-inch display
Stacked battery
Graphene cooling system
8-core cpu design
Second generation 3nm 🎉
@@Silence0813🎉🎉🎉
First of all the M chip isnway bigger like the A chip, it's meaningless to put inside the phone, even the tablet can't use all 30W capability of the chip, the phone with 6-10W power consumption can use it even less.
And actually the A17 chip itself beats the M1 in multiple ways, even in single core performance and in GPU performance.. what is actually a really big thing, the performance what destroyed the laptop market 3 years ago (when it released it was just 3 years) now already inside a tiny phone..
@@TamasKiss-yk4st If A17 pro have this efficiency and performance I am exited for M3 performance in iPad pro
They know how to put better cooling, even some cheap phones have better cooling than the iPhones.
Damn my old 14Pro Max have higher scores then new s24 ultra
2660 single and 7040 multicore
Yes that's the case
Wow that MT is kinda legendary for the A16 Bionic chip. Yours is hitting over 400 points higher than average!
My old one, which I optimized very well with all the settings for background tasks etc. could get just under 6700. For reference, my new 15 Pro Max can get 7500.
@@Epicgamer_Mac after iOS 17.2.1 performance increase That’s why i get those Numbers , before update results been like 5% lower , around 6750 - 6800Multi
geekbench scores are not comparable, at all. they've said it themselves, its coded differently on both playforms.
Geekbench is cross platform for their CPU test. GPU test is coded differently.
Do you have any plans to try testing the Poco X6 Pro's Dimensity 8300?, it is very close to the Dimensity 9200
If you brought luma on apple do you have to buy again for android?
I so waiting Death Stranding test ❤❤❤
Sameee will have to sell my 14 pro soon
Someone posted an early test I cancelled my pre order 🥲
Coming soon
Hi also can u compre the s24 u with iphone 14 and 13 pro max the reason i am asking this if it looses to even a16 or a15 its an optimisation issue if it wins then its bcs of single core i want to verify that
did you use light system mode ? (cpu)
No, you can look at the beginning of the video to check.
Cam you try the same after the recent update. The score might have some change, they added some stability patch for s series
damn the iphone 15 pro max is killing it! have to give props to Apple for their CPU performance 😁
Yeah im curious to see how the rog 8 Pro will do. I'm gonna get it when it comes to the U.S
On the s24 there was a Google ad playing during the task that was altering the performance or the s24 ultra...
The iPhone is clearly the best, and the anti-Apple brigade that claims all that power is meaningless, well, here is proof-positive that it isn't meaningless.
And when Samsung-affiliated Tweeters posted SSD speeds at 2X the speed of the iPhone, I pointed out that they should stop chasing benchmarks and instead focus on real life. I have seen 2X faster transfer speeds off USBC on the iPhone 15PM versus the S24U, and now internal SSD speeds may be 2X faster on the Samsung, but again, this isn't very meaningful.
Saying all that, it is mostly by-and-by as the average user doesn't do this often enough to care and even a bit slower, the S24U is still an amazing piece of tech that 20 years ago we could not even imagine would be in our hands!
Thanks!
Will The s24 ultra have Death Stranding available during lunch?
No unfortunately it’s another iOS exclusive
I’ll be posting a video very soon
is it me or this color is more blue than violet on s24U. I think the titanium color looks preetier tbh but literally every youtuber bought that. And tbh they are very close while s24U has the s-pen which gives the big edge in editing and overall screen real estate is better for productivity.
As always, this is a great test.
but here's a some take
Usually, almost every smartphone chip includes a dedicated circuit for rendering video, also known as a HW Codec. So, in simple export tests, the workload on the CPU is relatively light. The GPU isn't used at all. Also, the HW Codec in the A17 Pro seems to be a bit faster than the Snapdragon's. This doesn't really reflect the chipset's overall performance, though.
What's unique about HW Codecs is that their implementation varies by chipset, which means the output quality can differ too. Even if they use the same codec and produce similar file sizes, a well-made HW Codec results in less quality degradation in the output.(I assume this is part of reason why iPhone video quality is good)
Of course, SW codecs typically have the least quality loss.
What I'm curious about is whether the difference in output quality of high-quality videos processed through these encodings is visible to the naked eye. Also, I wonder how much of a speed difference there is when exporting complex projects with multiple clips overlaid and various effects applied.
I'm not asking you to find out all this right now, but it might be fun to try an easy method for testing this in a similar topic video in the future
Thank you for sharing. I learned something new everyday
But did every one of these apps use hardware-accelerated rendering? If not, which uses software-rendering? There may be differences in the quality of software rendering, actually, there always are, but they are extremely far from being detectable even from experts' eyes, but, could this case be the exception?
@@ThePowerLover Good point. Yes, as you said, some apps might use software rendering.
Typically, software rendering causes high loads and overheating, so it's usually not used. However, in The Tech Chap's video, the Exynos-equipped S24+ showed significant performance degradation and slower animation response due to overheating after running Adobe Rush. (This can be seen at 4:24 in the video titled "Snapdragon vs Exynos - GALAXY S24 Plus vs S24 Ultra!")
Such heavy loads would not occur with hardware rendering, leading me to strongly suspect the use of software rendering (CPU-based rendering). The Exynos 2400 doesn't have these issues when capturing video, suggesting that hardware rendering doesn't cause such severe overheating.
Therefore, Adobe might be using software rendering.
This raises a question: Does Adobe Rush use software rendering on all smartphones? I recall a video where the Exynos 2200 couldn't export video in Adobe Rush, probably because Rush couldn't access the Exynos 2200's hardware codec. If the Exynos 2400 has a similar issue, Adobe might automatically switch to software rendering when it can't access hardware rendering.
So, it's just a speculation that devices with the Exynos 2400 might exceptionally use software rendering.
@@bluetran1 Thanks for your honest answer.
The 15 Pro Max is just too good
iPhone strikes back
As always
Dream on
Great video but can u try one more app its kinemaster its an request may be the s24u has a shot there
Test game carxstreet please. With the fps meter it is a very demanding game, I don't think I can maintain a stable 60
Make a video: iPhone 15 pro max genshin impact 120 fps test
I have 15 pro mx but video rendering in 4 k in vn is slow even than my 3 year old s 21 ultra, by about half . can anyone explain why
explanation: you are lying
no please check other reviews also, iphone video export is way slower then counterpart samsung ones, i just dont know why in this video he is getting faster speeds on iphone 15, BTW i have iphone 15PM and edit videos on my phone only, you can check my youtube channel@@Akcy09
Your claim is so ridiculous it's not even funny.
@@Akcy09 Think as you like, i will not waste ma time explaining people in youtube. Cheers😄
@@Akcy09if he had said on his android you won't say he's lying..... Hypocrisy
What I wanna know is how the hell was Vadim getting equal multi-core performance in iPhone and S24 Ultra.😂😮
He probably was using the iPhone more before testing. There are so many variables that could cause that
@@DameTechOhh that makes sense, I didn’t think of that! I’m gonna try just impromptu-running both devices after they’ve been used normally for a while and see if that makes a difference rather than running them cold. I will report back.
@@DameTechOk, after a looong time of me and a family member running tests on our phones while using them normally beforehand, I can confirm: there is a very small drop in performance for 3D Mark, 0.8-1 fps for both phones. 25.5 and 27.1 initially (cold) to 24.6 and 26.1 (after normal use) for iPhone and Galaxy, respectively. In terms of Geekbench, the drop in performance was basically negligible (within margin of error).
However, while normal use doesn’t significantly reduce performance of benchmarks run immediately after, running benchmarks in quick succession does, particularly 3D Mark. Geekbench multi core drops on both phones by 200-350 pts consistently after a 3D Mark run, and 3D Mark scores dropped almost exactly 3 fps on both. Still more interestingly, my iPhone was still scoring higher than Vadim’s in both benchmarks even after being heat-soaked. I believe this is a combination of both silicon lottery and Damien’s correct theory of heat-soaking from previous tests.
@Epicgamer_Mac oh wow
Realme 12 series unboxing video pls
No , Chinese garbage
Bro do a video on PUBG mobile 90fps test with fps meter in Iphone 15 pro max
Bro iPhone only have CPU but Android (S24 ultra) have CPU,NPU,GPU so it's make sense that it will take time and will also consume much better than iPhone, but in my opinion both the phones are best even though i never used IOS but this phone is much better according to its components and please don't troll me if i am wrong i never used iPhone may be I'm wrong about it so never mind....
The title is misleading as hell😂
Ohh i thought you are going to Use Kinemaster Which is lightning fast on Android. I have said this on your older video.. it have more downloads than most of the apps that you have used on this video.. You have used 4 apps in your video and even after combining all the downloads data both on Playstore and Appstore it still don't match the download number of Kinemaster on Playstore which have a wooping 100million download even without including the one who sideload. It seems your are still trying hard to pick the one that are better on ios rather than Higher number of download
InShot has 500m downloads and thats just google play store 💀, Kinemaster has 100m on the Google Play Store and much less on App Store. Again I'm choosing what's popular between both iOS and Google Play Store, not just android. Filmora I picked because PhoneBuff uses and plus, devs said its optimized primarily for android (plus your favorite Tech Talk used this app in his test). Adobe Rush I picked because this is what's actually the most popular. Downloads don't equate to what's actually being used by real editors vs random people. Adobe Rush is the most used editing software due to its cross platform between PC and Mobile. Final Cut would be second but that's iOS/MacOS exclusive. As for Lumafusion, this is my preferred and editing app I use for every video in my channel. Plus, Samsung broadcast and specifically show cased this app on their Keynote and said it was specifically optimized for Galaxy devices. At the end of the day, I told this to you already. Your too biased to see why I choose these apps.
@@DameTech and just look at the download of lumafusion and adobe not even 50million haha
Kinemaster is one the oldest Video editor on mobile Device comparing to the one you used.. Kinemaster was released on both Android and Ios on 2013... So there are many changes and optimisation especially on Android. The one you used are soo new especially adobe and lumafusion those two was released on Android between 2019-2023..
Again, I've stated my reasons for Adobe Rush and Lumafusion, it has nothing to do with downloads but Luma is my favorite editing app and also happens to be a application Samsung endorsed. As for Adobe, it is available across PC and mobile. I dare you to ask any editor which is popular, Kinemaster or Adobe Rush....as for downloads again, kinemaster has 100 million and InShot has 500m if we're speaking strictly of downloads. Again I've stated this already. You have an issue with listening
Capcut best editing software for mobile
I need to add this one next time I keep forgetting
@@DameTech please thanks also can be done in shorts please
Okay! @@kasiitaali
4k rendering???
Yes
Everyone know iPhone have better cpu
We need more Gpu test… 😊
Didn't you see Geekbench Compute Score, KID? LOL
@@Troll_Master_911 A17 pro >> 8 gen 3 🎉
@@Troll_Master_911lol snapdragon is like 2x more powerful in gpu
@@innocentanthony3324 30% faster in synthetic tests, but in gaming tests: snapdragon 8 gen 3 used 80% gpu
A17 pro used 60% gpu 🎉
Please stop with the benchmarks; they mean very little, as other factors can easily make massive differences, from better software, more optimisation, and better AI tricks.
❤❤
A17 is a beast😈🔥
spoiler
No
Spoilers
You are android trash user😂
Thanks 😅
The iPhone continues to amaze me 😮
Iphone wins
no
iPhone is not better than Samsung and Samsung ain't better than iphone
Wise mindset
iPhone >>>>> all
i15 pro max..🔥🔥🔥
What's this now? Using the MOV video as the source file instead of MP4 now? 💀
I'm using an mp4 as the source video. This vidoe is directly from the s23u. If you don't believe hop on discord and I'll show screenshots
S24u did much better than the s23u samsung is closing the gap
You wasn't even tapping the screen at the same time 😂😂😂 this ish was bias as hell
What are you saying. I did, and let's play devils advocate. The iPhone had a pretty big enough lead that even a split second wouldn't make a difference with this 10 minute render test.
iPhone won the every categories.
iPhone beast king 👑
Android trash lag
Learn English first kid
@@innocentanthony3324 cry harder
Both are not good.
@@AntiGrieferGames agree 😅
@@Silence0813 cry
When apple fan make a video comparison
then do it yourself i wanna see it
When samsung fan cant take the fact that iphones are just more optimized and stronger
Dont cry please
Oh no….r u mad ?
😥 I literally show everything. There is nothing that I hide. You can even slow down video to see the setup. For apps, im simply using what's popular amongst both ios and Android/Samsung. Kinmaster is only popular on Android if your wondering why I haven't used this app.
I can't trust your tests
Cry fandroid
😥 I literally show everything. There is nothing that I hide. You can even slow down video to see the setup. For apps, im simply using what's popular amongst both ios and Android/Samsung. Kinmaster is only popular on Android if you’re wondering why I haven't used this app.
It’s fine Omar we don’t trust you mate.
@@DameTech Your test results always go to the iPhone, I don't know why, but when I see other tests it's a different situation
It’s not that my test always goes to iPhone. It’s just the S24U is under performing. I’m not the only reviewer mentioning this. Check on twitter there are a plethora of posts and tests. As for 4K rendering, the only app where I see S24U winning is KineMaster. However, even the devs acknowledged when I spoke with them that the app isn’t optimized properly for iOS and was primarily designed for Android. Hence, I can’t use that app. Instead, I’ve used LumaFusion that was advertised on Samsung’s keynote, plus I use this app for my RUclips channel. Filmora is what PhoneBuff uses. Adobe rush is probably the most popular app out there. And InShot has the most positive reviews on both Google and App Store. If you ask me this is fair testing. The only app I forgot to add was CapCut. I will make a short for this one