I'm Korean. According to the news, the pilot was a veteran among the veterans. I think there are some problems with the Jeju Air flight. Recently, the captains of Jeju Air said they couldn't fly. There was no inspection problem with the flight, but something was wrong. This morning, the flight of Jeju Air to Jeju Island turned back. The reason is the landing gear problem. How can two planes from the same airline have landing gear problems at the same time? We need to look into it.
A concrete wall at end of runway baffles me. Most airports nowadays have Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS). A crushable material placed at the end of a runway that slows down and stops an aircraft. The aircraft's tires sink into the material, which quickly de-accelerates the plane. RIP to victims.
The concrete wall had the localizer antenna mounted on it. Clearly visible on Google ; Earth at the end of runway 19, which was the runway they were using. Seems like EVERYONE is asking why they weren't installed on metal framework instead of a reinforced concrete wall that a tank could run over without leaving any trace. Some other questions like, why was the right hand trust reverser deployed, but the left hand wasn't? No flaps, no speed brakes and a gear up landing. Flight tracking show the aircraft lined up, initially, on runway 01, but it landed on 19. And the track is not available (at this time, maybe later) for the last part of the approach where it went around from runway 01 to land on 19. By the way, @TheLonelyVoyager, nice description of the EMAS. Short, to the point, and exact. I do not have any data, but it seems most airports do not have that installed....yet. It might not have helped here as the airplane landed gear up. And a last question would be about why the pilots failed to follow the gear up checklist as many items that WOULD be apparent, if they had followed it, are not there....
So far death toll is at 62 out of about 180. Sadly it will probably rise considerably. I don’t see much survivability with that collision and explosion. Very sad! RIP
Unfortunately people will prioritise economic benefit (putting real estate near runways) over safety. And then accidents like this happen that kill hundreds of people
@jwudang714 Histoty says, a Korean Airlines plane clipped one of these barriers, landing too early in bad weather, killing many passengers. There should be no reinforced concrete barriers on either side of a runway.
With that full amount of speed, with no landing gears and flaps down, nothing to say. It's just a horrific disaster. If the runway a bit longer, the probability to safe is higher. Rest in peace 😢
horrific disaster for sure, but...why arent the gears open is my question, and if there was a damage did the pilot had the indication that the gears weren't open/ couldn't atc notice it and call for go around, or did the wheels collapse on touch down?
See: LOT Polish Airlines Flight 16. It baffles me what the hell I just saw had happened in Korea. Full-speed landing without landing gear ejected with the wall at the end of the runway? Seriously? There really wasn't time to plan it differently? No other options? No other runways, airfields nearby? Nobody there to assess it was impossible to not crash into the wall given the circumstances? Or maybe the plane touched down in the middle of the runway length and it's the pilots' fault? Don't know, but it looks absurd.
It didn’t veer off the runway…. It went straight off the end and collided with a berm at 100knots… no emas system, no crushable blast deflector but a 30ft high dirt berm. Stupid idea to have that there.
No one expected it to crash. In hindsight, we all see things differently. Have some respect for those who lost their lives. Imagine the pilots and the fact that they knew they were going to die.
@@janedegg4030 how tf was that disrespectful to the deceased? If anything, you using their deaths to lecture others for no reason and look good online is 100x more disrespectful. Grow up.
@@janedegg4030 Being angry that they died needlessly isn't showing disrespect - it's the exact opposite. Being apathetic to their death is disrespect which is what you're asking for - what's wrong with you?
Why there is a wall and not enough space for crash landing? It is absolutely normal crash landing, and it is expected that plane can divert a bit from the runway. This could have been avoided.
Imagine being a family member of the deceased but still clinging on to hope that the two who did survive is your family. Apparently the rest of the passenger died, which is 179 deaths so this is a big accident.
@@after_midnight9592 It is deployed on the right side for sure but not on the left. I don’t think that sliding motion would cause it to pull the cover like that.
Apart from the obvious raised landing gear, the flaps seem to be much higher than normal (probably flaps 5), the reverse thrusters somehow applied without landing gear but the speed brakes did not. This runway is 3km long, yet they were still travelling over 200km/h at the end of this runway. Confusing, and truly sad.
Yes very strange indeed, it also seems like they landed way beyond the touchdown zone. It's very speculative in nature but it is likely as a result of bird strike the pilots became very disoriented, because of increasing workload as they were busy with engine shutdown procedures, they forgot to lower the landing gears which is very unlikely but possible even after audible aural warning. But it is also likely that engine fire bell/engine failure warning has higher priority than landing gear warning causing it to be silenced/inhibited.
The disaster may have been caused by a combination of factors, including a belly landing and a runway overrun. The touchdown with minimal flap deployment likely reduced the aircraft's lift and drag, impairing its ability to decelerate effectively upon landing. Cold weather conditions could have contributed by causing reduced tire friction on a potentially icy or slippery runway surface, further hindering the aircraft's ability to stop within the available runway length. High landing speed, improper approach configuration, or mechanical failures might have compounded the issue. Additionally, the cold weather might have affected the performance of braking systems or reverse thrust, exacerbating the situation.
In Poland, a few years ago, there was an incident with Lot - first the plane burned fuel, then they inflated the entire runway and landed without landing gear and there was no wall at the end of the runway. this is some absurdity going on there.... 
The incident you mentioned is: LOT Polish Airlines Flight 16. And yes, it baffles me what the hell I just saw had happened in Korea. Full-speed landing without landing gear ejected with the wall at the end of the runway? Seriously? There really wasn't time to plan it differently? No other options? No other runways, airfields nearby? Nobody there to assess it was impossible to not crash into the wall given the circumstances? Or maybe the plane touched down in the middle of the runway length and it's the pilots' fault? Don't know, but it looks absurd.
Yikes, what is the chances of survival with that type of explosion? It didn't crash too hard seeing that it wasn't up in the air, but that fire was brutal.
It glide to the runway but unfortunately it hit probably the barrier at the end of the runway. Im not an aeronautics engineer but it looks like the plane lost something on the landing gears, front gear didnt deploy and it seems it has no breaks or the break cant do nothing.
“John Cox, the CEO of aviation consulting firm Safety Operating Systems and a former 737 pilot, said the runway design "absolutely" did not meet industry best practices, which preclude any hard structure like a berm within at least 300 metres of a runway's end.”
It has a run off area, about 300m long. After that comes a wall for many reasons: Noise Mitigation, Security, Environmental Protection, Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Control, Wind and Jet Blast Protection, Safety Barriers, Operational Efficiency, Legal and Regulatory Compliance.
The wall is there for various reasons: Noise Mitigation, Security, Environmental Protection, Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Control, Wind and Jet Blast Protection, Safety Barriers, Operational Efficiency, Legal and Regulatory Compliance.
@BTSArmy-jp7ch I understand your thought process, but some airports, such as Fort Lauderdale in America, have a wall immediately after the runway, not 300 meters away. The question is not about the wall, but why the plane was so fast with no flaps or gear deployed.
Yes, a plane can stop even if the landing gear fails and the engine is off, but it depends on several factors and requires careful handling by the pilots: 1. Aerodynamic Drag and Friction: Without landing gear, the plane would slide on its belly, which creates friction with the runway surface. This friction helps to slow down the aircraft. 2. Emergency Braking Systems: Modern aircraft have redundant braking systems, including hydraulic or manual backups, which can assist in slowing the plane even without engine power. 3. Reverse Thrust Unavailable: With the engines off, reverse thrust (a common way to decelerate) won't be available, so braking and drag will do the job. 4. Runway Conditions: The runway's surface plays a critical role. A long, dry, and smooth runway provides better deceleration compared to a wet or icy one. 5. Speed and Weight: The plane's speed on touchdown and its weight will affect how quickly it can stop. 6. Pilot Skill and Procedures: Pilots are trained to handle such emergencies using techniques like belly landings. They rely on specific protocols to ensure a safe stop. While a plane without landing gear may stop safely, the scenario can lead to significant damage to the aircraft and potentially pose risks to passengers and crew. Emergency services are usually on standby in such situations to assist. So you cannot say that the engines remain running 🙂
Why was this plane with gear maintenance issues allowed to fly? Somebody allowed it to take off and when allowed to land by flight ops, no foam in the ground, it was allowed to land. The planes are being pushed and this plane should have been grounded.
Why are there almost always obstacles pretty much immediately after the runway ends? Horrible design. So many lives lost planes hitting into buildings, fences etc.
It's within regulations. After RW19 there is a 50m run off area filled with gravel and a total of 300m until the brick wall which is there for various reasons. (Noise Mitigation, Security, Environmental Protection, Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Control, Wind and Jet Blast Protection, Safety Barriers, Operational Efficiency, Legal and Regulatory Compliance.)
So this is 100% your fault then, will you be going to Korea and turning yourself in to the authorities there? Or will you surrendering in your home country for extradition?
The better question is why was the plane still moving so fast at the end of the runway? This does not look like a short runway. There is more to the story here.
Many reasons I can't list off. Runways are mainly designed for wind directions, which is important for landing and taking off. Real question is, how and why they overran the runway?
@@Mr.Yoshi20 what can we expect from you. There should be ample space for the gravel after the runway ends. They could have been saved if there wasn't a wall right there
An A320 wouldn't have performed much better in such a situation. The better question is: why were no flaps deployed, why wasn't the landing gear working, and why was it so fast at the end of the runway?
Very sad. Muan Airport has a 9100 foot runway which is ample length for a wheels up landing. One question I have is why the aircraft was not in landing configuration? That is, the aircraft did not have the flaps down. Even worse, the spoilers were not up up after it touched down. The reverse thrust on the right wing is functioning but cannot do much at this speed. I would like to know how far down the runway the aircraft actually touched down.
@@sidenbldtho idk man, theres been some shady stuff recently with boeings, whistleblowers have came out and saying theres some serious safety issues with theses planes. Search up John Barnett, Sam Mohawk and Roy Irvin, they might change your perspective.
Bro these people have to stop getting on the bandwagon of “Boeings fault” this is something that was out of Boeing’s situation. Complete crew’s situation here, either they failed to safely land it (pilot error) or something even out of the pilot’s hands. We just gotta wait until the report comes out…
I dont know with the money air companys have and airports have they put a fricking concrete WALL right past runway... If they have put at least 50 to 100 meters of sand right after runway that plane would have stoped there before going out. But a fricking concrete wall?? why?? cheaper??... Rest in Peace everyone who lost theyr lovely ones and hope family sue not only the company but also the airport more than the plane company
walls are commonly used everywhere to divide up property that is not theirs and should not be accessible to the general public. if there was apartments on that other side and sand instead of a wall people would be complaining as to why they didn't use a wall. you are at the line of what is considered reasonable for a company to do. while you are at it you should also tell them to complain why they didn't hire superman to slow the plane down.
@@irregulargamer1352 Formula 1 and all car competitions have sand to stop the cars preventing huge crashes before hitting the wall so the driver doesnt die or get hurt. Why is not possible to do the same on airports?. Sand is well known to stop even airplanes like this on the video at that 250m/h before hitting the wall. But yeah i get your point its way too expensive to do that so customers pays less for the ticket that is
It's really saddening They were probably getting back home to celebrate New Years with their loved ones...it happened in mere fee seconds...all cause the landing gears didn't worked. Maybe final inspection wasn't done properly...
1. Install additional tyre sets front and back. 2. Install asap, tyre cooling system and landing set maintenance check system. 3. Install runway temp sensor inside landing area and another at mid area 4. Install runway surface controlled mist or dew cooling system. 5. In front of similar walls in other airports, install metallic rope system, for emergency plane runway assisted braking and install F1 type tyre crash guards too.
CRAZY....RIP to those that didn't make it, hoping some miraculously made it through that crash, but hard to envision that happening. Horrible for the family and friends effected. Won't be flying Jeju Air in my lifetime!
The Boeing 737 was slowing down nicely even with the belly landing until it hit the wall.. Without the presence of the wall, the plane would probably not have burst into flames. Bad bad wall.
The wall is most likely there to act as a barrier from other buildings or highways. Not saying this is the case for this runway but most airports have some sort of barriers or large gaps to prevent further tragedy.
Dumbass pilot that decided to land on a short runway with a wall. Incheon airpirt is huge and doesnt have walls and couldve easily and better accomadated the crash Also could bave easily done a landing on water Seriously stupid pilot
It depends, there are airports with this, there are airports which have limited areas, but still pass the length checks. Its just this time that it got messed up
1. With landing gear failure the aircraft must be diverted to the longest reachable runway nearby 2. It seems like landed half runway, go around and try again. 3. What that wall on the end of the runway using for, can someone explain
IN WATCHING THAT, i saw there was no way to brake but with flaps and reversers. The wall was inevitable. Without knowledge, would landing on the grass rather than a smooth hard surface runway have been better?
there is no wall in between the runway actually the plane had landing gear malfunction and it was not landing at all without the wheels the flight ran on its belly all over the runway until it crashed over the outer fence placed in the airport
Heartfelt condolences to all those families who lost their loved ones and pray for speedy recovery for those who are injured!! God may the departed soul rest in peace!!! Prayers from Nepal
Unlikely that the pilots forgot to put the landing gear down, there are lots of systems that activate when the planes GPWS (Ground Proximity Warning System) detects its low to the ground. The would have gotten "Landing Gear" and "Terrain, Terrain" warnings, as well as a really loud tone that activates when flaps are set to a specific setting with out the landing gear down.
@@johnwillis3421 안타깝게도 저는 항공사와 무관한 사람이므로 이렇다 라고 확실한 답변을 드리지는 못 할 거 같습니다 활주로 끝 즉 외벽이 존재하는 이유를 조사해 본 결과 항공기 이탈 방지: * 활주로 이탈 사고 방지: 항공기가 활주로를 이탈하여 주변 시설이나 인명 피해로 이어지는 것을 방지하기 위한 가장 중요한 목적입니다. * 안전 구역 확보: 국제민간항공기구(ICAO)는 항공기가 활주로 안에서 멈추지 못하는 '오버런'에 대비해 안전 구역을 두도록 규정하고 있습니다. 등 다양한 이유가 존재합니다 그리고 한국 뉴스에 의거하여 이 항공기가 부딪히게 된 둔덕은 규정을 위반 한 것은 아니라 사료됩니다 공항안전운영기준 제42조에 따르면 설치가 허가된 물체를 지지하는 기초구조물이 지반보다 7.5cm 이상 높지 않고 부러지기 쉬운 구조로 세워져야 한다 라 하고 있습니다 질문 하신 질문자께서 궁금해 하시는 벽의 존재의 이유는 다음과 같습니다 무안국제공항은 활주로 종단 이후 지면이 기울어져 있기 때문에 흙으로 둔덕을 세워 수평을 맞췄다. 로컬라이저는 활주로의 중앙선과 수직을 이루도록 하여 배치돼야 항공기가 제대로 활주로 중앙 정렬을 맞출 수 있기 때문이다. 라고 답변 드릴수 있을 것 같습니다. 다시 한번 돌아가신 모든 분들의 삼가고인의명복을빕니다 두번 다시는 이런 사고가 발생하지 않으면 좋겠습니다 감사합니다
@@johnwillis3421무안국제공항은 활주로 종단 이후 지면이 기울어져 있기 때문에 흙으로 둔덕을 세워 수평을 맞췄다. 로컬라이저는 활주로의 중앙선과 수직을 이루도록 하여 배치돼야 항공기가 제대로 활주로 중앙 정렬을 맞출 수 있기 때문이다. 라는 이유가 있다고 합니다 다만 항공업계 관계자는 “오버런 사태를 대비해서 로컬라이저는 반드시 비행기가 쉽게 뚫고 지나갈 수 있도록 만들어야 한다”며 “수평이 맞지 않을 경우에는 통상적으로 철골 구조물을 올린다”고 지적했다고 합니다.
The plane clearly slowed down on the grass. Who the hell thought of putting a wall?! If there was no wall they couldve either survived or have lesser deaths.
Reports from Korean sources said the captain decided to abort landing after the bird strike and subsequent engine failure and loss of electronic and hydraulic controls. That's when it all went downhill. The time spent circling above the airport while the engine was burning after the bird strike caused toxic gases to fill the plane so the pilots were in a hurry for a second landing attempt. It seems landing on the opposite direction was intentional because some say there was a village on the other side. December is also the time when migratory birds flock to the area so it was all a combination of bad circumstances.
Just a few thoughts on this as a fellow av-geek: -First and foremost, my sincerest condolences, thoughts, and prayers go out to the victims, their families, and everyone affected by this devastating accident. -Regarding the plane's speed, it seems far too fast for a belly landing. Typically, a much slower speed is necessary for such an emergency maneuver. -Was this truly the only viable runway? Wouldn't it have been safer to divert to an alternative airport, like Busan's Gimhae Airport or Incheon Airport, which have longer runways and could facilitate a safer landing? -I'm skeptical about the explanation that a bird strike caused the landing gear malfunction. Bird strikes more commonly impact the engines rather than the landing gear's functionality. -This incident raises serious concerns about JejuAir’s safety policies. Are there adequate measures in place to handle emergencies like this?
Unfortunately kids have been consuming things like gore on the regular now since theyre raised on the internet, so they probably think this is “sigma” or some bs
이 사고는 bird strike에 의한 엔진, 랜딩기어 고장때문에 발생했습니다. 랜딩기어의 고장원인은 아직 파악중입니다. 동체착륙을 할만큼 급박한 상황이었을것으로 추측됩니다. 평소와 반대 방향으로 비상착륙을 하였는데 그 이유는 반대 방향에 마을이 있기 때문입니다. 사고가 난 전라남도 무안이라는 곳은 겨울에 철새가 많이 날아오는 지역이라 위험 가능성을 가지고 있는 곳입니다. 그래도 마지막까지 기수를 놓치지 않은 기장,부기장에게 경의를 표하고 희생자들의 애도를 표합니다. 생존자는 승무원 2명입니다. 다수의 희생자가 밖으로 튕겨져 날아가거나 불에 휩쌓였습니다. 너무 안타까운 사고 입니다.
사고 현장에 새는 단 한마리도 보이지 않았습니다. 그리고 버드 스트라이크라 할지라도 저렇게 사고가 크게 날 일이 아닙니다. 저 공항 주변이 전부 갯벌이고, 그 갯벌에 착륙했다면 인명사고를 충분히 줄일 수 있는 상황이었음에도 불구하고 왜 속도가 줄어들지도 않은 상황에서 무리하게 그 짧은 활주로에 착륙을 시도했을까요. 이건 단순히 우연한 사고라고 보기엔 이상한 점이 너무나도 많습니다.
@ 잘못된 정보입니다. 착륙전에 사망자가 어머니에 보낸 메세지에 “엄마, 새가 날개에 끼어서 착륙을 못하고 있어”라고 보냈습니다. 무안공항은 바다 바로 옆인데 낚시꾼이 비행기의 반대방향에서 날아오던 새떼와 정면 충돌한 것을 목격했다고 합니다. 단, 랜딩기어는 엔진과 별개로 왜 고장난건지 블랙박스 분석 이후 결과가 나오겠죠.
@@jamsil_ghost 승객은 엔진의 상태를 정확히 알 수 없습니다. 사망자의 그 메세지는 이 사고의 원인이 버드스트라이크였음을 증명할 수 없습니다. 당시 상황을 촬영한 영상에서는 철새가 단 한마리도 보이지 않았고 엔진이 갑자기 폭발합니다. 엔진이 터질 정도로 심각한 버드스트라이크가 일어나려면 철새 무리가 전부 부딪쳐야 하고, 영상에 이 철새 무리가 보였어야 하는 것이 옳습니다.
@ 엔진에 연기나는 제보영상 하나로 무슨 판단을 할 수 있죠? 그 영상에 새가 없다고 버드 스트라이크가 아니라 확신할 수 있나요? 그리고 날개 앞에 앉았다면 버드스트라이크 같은 파손여부는 육안으로 확인 가능합니다. 모든 가능성은 열려있습니다. 우리가 섣불리 판단하는것은 옳지 못하지만 현재까지 정황상 버드 스트라이크는 높은 확률로 맞다고 봐집니다. 다만 버드 스트라이크와 별개로, 랜딩기어를 내릴수 없는 상황은 정비불량인지, 재차 복항과 비상절차를 하지 않고 동체착륙을 할만큼 긴박했던 이유가 무엇인지는 밝혀져야겠죠. 안타까울 뿐입니다.
Analysis suggests that they hoped to make an emergency landing at sea near the airport, but due to insufficient distance, they mistakenly landed at the rear of the airport
Goddamn I was not expecting the plane to literally explode into flames. Rest in peace to all who lost their lives.
i mean... it crashed into a wall.
@@macabo Actually, it looked like it crashed into a dirt berm at the end of the runway. Pretty horrific.
@@ayokay123Do you know what was the main cause for this incident.Drivers's fault?
@@Charan_1818landing gear failure
Bro u can litterally see that the plane had no landing gears out in the back@@Charan_1818
I'm Korean. According to the news, the pilot was a veteran among the veterans. I think there are some problems with the Jeju Air flight. Recently, the captains of Jeju Air said they couldn't fly. There was no inspection problem with the flight, but something was wrong. This morning, the flight of Jeju Air to Jeju Island turned back. The reason is the landing gear problem. How can two planes from the same airline have landing gear problems at the same time? We need to look into it.
It’s not a South Korea
That is North Korea
🙏😇.. The Pilot in Command .. "Turned-Off the Good-Engine" .. He Made a Terrible Mistake .. 🙏😇
A concrete wall at end of runway baffles me. Most airports nowadays have Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS). A crushable material placed at the end of a runway that slows down and stops an aircraft. The aircraft's tires sink into the material, which quickly de-accelerates the plane. RIP to victims.
yes i wondered about that too
Even if it didn’t have one, the crew could’ve manually extended the landing gear despite no hydraulics.
It is an old airport most likely.
The reason is that that area is close to private housing
The concrete wall had the localizer antenna mounted on it. Clearly visible on Google ; Earth at the end of runway 19, which was the runway they were using. Seems like EVERYONE is asking why they weren't installed on metal framework instead of a reinforced concrete wall that a tank could run over without leaving any trace.
Some other questions like, why was the right hand trust reverser deployed, but the left hand wasn't? No flaps, no speed brakes and a gear up landing.
Flight tracking show the aircraft lined up, initially, on runway 01, but it landed on 19. And the track is not available (at this time, maybe later) for the last part of the approach where it went around from runway 01 to land on 19.
By the way, @TheLonelyVoyager, nice description of the EMAS. Short, to the point, and exact. I do not have any data, but it seems most airports do not have that installed....yet. It might not have helped here as the airplane landed gear up. And a last question would be about why the pilots failed to follow the gear up checklist as many items that WOULD be apparent, if they had followed it, are not there....
December: 1. Kazakhstan 🇰🇿
2. South Korea 🇰🇷
yeah its nearly 2025
sheesh
What was shot down by the Russian military though.
😳😳😳😳
Asia is not safe
So far death toll is at 62 out of about 180. Sadly it will probably rise considerably. I don’t see much survivability with that collision and explosion. Very sad! RIP
And many victims of 3rd Burn degree!
The two survivors are crew members, and the rest of the passengers are likely dead.
The current death toll has risen further to 86
it’s confirmed to be 179, only 1 crew member and 1 passenger survived and are being treated
찢? 이재명 비하하시는건가요?
Why is there a barrier at the end of the runway. There should be no houses beyond the end of a runway to protect, but an open field.
Landed in the opposite direction to reduce the damage to the civilian‘s house
Unfortunately people will prioritise economic benefit (putting real estate near runways) over safety. And then accidents like this happen that kill hundreds of people
@jwudang714 Histoty says, a Korean Airlines plane clipped one of these barriers, landing too early in bad weather, killing many passengers. There should be no reinforced concrete barriers on either side of a runway.
Should have no barriers at either end of runway. Don’t put any houses near either end.
Rest in peace to those who lost their lives and condolences to the family and friends affected by this terrible accident.
This has been an awful year for the whole world.
Same😢😢😢
No it hasn't
@@flyerboy2594 Yeah it has.
The least awful year of the following years
@@disorderlymovement just because you year was bad don't mean it was for others
With that full amount of speed, with no landing gears and flaps down, nothing to say. It's just a horrific disaster. If the runway a bit longer, the probability to safe is higher. Rest in peace 😢
horrific disaster for sure, but...why arent the gears open is my question, and if there was a damage did the pilot had the indication that the gears weren't open/ couldn't atc notice it and call for go around, or did the wheels collapse on touch down?
even with landing gears open, is it possible that plane can get stopped with such short remaining runway, ??
@@ojihamsar3037with gears yes. But if they damaged, the whole plane just slides on ice, like in the video…
See: LOT Polish Airlines Flight 16. It baffles me what the hell I just saw had happened in Korea. Full-speed landing without landing gear ejected with the wall at the end of the runway? Seriously? There really wasn't time to plan it differently? No other options? No other runways, airfields nearby? Nobody there to assess it was impossible to not crash into the wall given the circumstances? Or maybe the plane touched down in the middle of the runway length and it's the pilots' fault? Don't know, but it looks absurd.
It's hard to understand a rigid concrete wall at the end of a runway surviving any proper risk assessment
What the hell.. twice in a row
Idk about you but I think this is connected somehow
There have been plenty of aircraft related accidents this month. Not too long after this a Canadian plane was on fire.
one of plane incidents is attracted by Russia
@@Cinco-x4t oh man... come on... please stop with these ridiculous conspiracy theories.
@@RuLeZ1988 two plane crashes in two days I mean that a little suspicious
Sad year end for aviation and people...😢😢
It didn’t veer off the runway…. It went straight off the end and collided with a berm at 100knots… no emas system, no crushable blast deflector but a 30ft high dirt berm. Stupid idea to have that there.
No one expected it to crash. In hindsight, we all see things differently. Have some respect for those who lost their lives. Imagine the pilots and the fact that they knew they were going to die.
@@janedegg4030 how tf was that disrespectful to the deceased? If anything, you using their deaths to lecture others for no reason and look good online is 100x more disrespectful. Grow up.
Frfr smh
@@janedegg4030 Being angry that they died needlessly isn't showing disrespect - it's the exact opposite. Being apathetic to their death is disrespect which is what you're asking for - what's wrong with you?
@@janedegg4030That is why you don't put a freaking wall at the end of the runway. It is just criminal. Makes absolutely no sense
Heart felt condolences to those families who have lost their loved ones and pray God for speedy recovery for those Injured.
Unfortunately, this is the second terrible accident this week. My condolences to the families of the deceased from Azerbaijan.😔😔
Why there is a wall and not enough space for crash landing? It is absolutely normal crash landing, and it is expected that plane can divert a bit from the runway. This could have been avoided.
179 killed in passenger plane crash in South Korea airport today, May all souls rest in peace, deepest condolences& respect
how two people still survived that is unbelievable.
Imagine being a family member of the deceased but still clinging on to hope that the two who did survive is your family. Apparently the rest of the passenger died, which is 179 deaths so this is a big accident.
The 2 survivors were flight attendents sitting at the tail section of the plane
空乘，坐在最后面的小座位上的
Total hydraulic failure. No flaps, no gear, no reversers. That thing was going twice as fast as it should have been on approach.
Reversers are deployed look closely.
@@kevinjones1298 Cos the plane landed on the back of the engines. It looks like this pulled the covers back.
@@after_midnight9592 It is deployed on the right side for sure but not on the left. I don’t think that sliding motion would cause it to pull the cover like that.
It was the nuclear bunker designed concrete ILS slab which did all the damage
Too many place crashes in a single year. 😢
min 1
5
In a single month
In a single week. *sigh*
lesson: try to stay out of planes
Apart from the obvious raised landing gear, the flaps seem to be much higher than normal (probably flaps 5), the reverse thrusters somehow applied without landing gear but the speed brakes did not. This runway is 3km long, yet they were still travelling over 200km/h at the end of this runway. Confusing, and truly sad.
Early reports of bird strike. Explains lack of reverse thrusters, that's obviously TBC.
Yes very strange indeed, it also seems like they landed way beyond the touchdown zone. It's very speculative in nature but it is likely as a result of bird strike the pilots became very disoriented, because of increasing workload as they were busy with engine shutdown procedures, they forgot to lower the landing gears which is very unlikely but possible even after audible aural warning. But it is also likely that engine fire bell/engine failure warning has higher priority than landing gear warning causing it to be silenced/inhibited.
The disaster may have been caused by a combination of factors, including a belly landing and a runway overrun. The touchdown with minimal flap deployment likely reduced the aircraft's lift and drag, impairing its ability to decelerate effectively upon landing. Cold weather conditions could have contributed by causing reduced tire friction on a potentially icy or slippery runway surface, further hindering the aircraft's ability to stop within the available runway length. High landing speed, improper approach configuration, or mechanical failures might have compounded the issue. Additionally, the cold weather might have affected the performance of braking systems or reverse thrust, exacerbating the situation.
Your background music is sooooo irritating 🤮🙉
Yes too loudly
You can turn down or turn off the volume on your computer.
@@williamshockley7692 but I am using phone 😂
Turn the volume down. You getting excellent visuals yet still find something to complain about!
So is your thoughts...
Deepest condolences. Air services should be more safe for passengers.
It’s literally the safest mode of transport wdym
That doesn’t mean it can’t be made safer
You don't say?
@@Nemo2507ssafest but lowest in survival.. at least in a ship i can escape better than a plane
After this accident you still say the safest lol@@Nemo2507s
Rest in peace to the people who passed away 🕊️
In Poland, a few years ago, there was an incident with Lot - first the plane burned fuel, then they inflated the entire runway and landed without landing gear and there was no wall at the end of the runway. this is some absurdity going on there....

As I remember, some airports have soft landing facilities for this kind of emergencies, I may be wrong. 😢
The incident you mentioned is: LOT Polish Airlines Flight 16. And yes, it baffles me what the hell I just saw had happened in Korea. Full-speed landing without landing gear ejected with the wall at the end of the runway? Seriously? There really wasn't time to plan it differently? No other options? No other runways, airfields nearby? Nobody there to assess it was impossible to not crash into the wall given the circumstances? Or maybe the plane touched down in the middle of the runway length and it's the pilots' fault? Don't know, but it looks absurd.
the wall is to avoid the plane in a case like this going into areas with more people and killing even more, but yeah it can be detrimental sometimes..
@@Bocianklekocian it was a suicide pilot or pilots
@@CrazySquareRoot pilot or pilots on suicide mission
This cannot be tolerated by my heart. 😢😢😢😢
Why a concrete wall there? Omg. All other airports have fencing only. Rip.
Yikes, what is the chances of survival with that type of explosion? It didn't crash too hard seeing that it wasn't up in the air, but that fire was brutal.
It glide to the runway but unfortunately it hit probably the barrier at the end of the runway. Im not an aeronautics engineer but it looks like the plane lost something on the landing gears, front gear didnt deploy and it seems it has no breaks or the break cant do nothing.
2 survivors out of 181 passengers and crew
@@jamilangon5798 If there were no walls they wouldve survived the crash
The two survivors were at the very back. A woman presumably using the bathroom, and a flight attendant.
@@boomtowncat2876 damn so almost all the reported survivor died?
What happened to the landing gear?
looks like runoff ground (sand pool/EMAS) was too small?
That was taking off ... So they off landing gear ... But plane didn't take off
@@poojalakshmanamurthy7347it’s a landing
@@poojalakshmanamurthy7347 it was landing bro. Taiwan -> Korea.
At that distance, the plane will crash into the wall even with landing gears? Why did it land like 500m in front of the end?
Why the frick is there a concrete wall at the end of a runway or anywhere close?!?
because thats the end of the runway?
“John Cox, the CEO of aviation consulting firm Safety Operating Systems and a former 737 pilot, said the runway design "absolutely" did not meet industry best practices, which preclude any hard structure like a berm within at least 300 metres of a runway's end.”
No run off area?
It's not F1
@@Nick-mt4wk airports have run off areas dude
They went past it, no landing gear so no breaking
It has a run off area, about 300m long. After that comes a wall for many reasons: Noise Mitigation, Security, Environmental Protection, Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Control, Wind and Jet Blast Protection, Safety Barriers, Operational Efficiency, Legal and Regulatory Compliance.
@@Chris-i4g ok dude
Ideally there shouldn't be a wall on either side of the runway
The wall is there for various reasons: Noise Mitigation, Security, Environmental Protection, Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Control, Wind and Jet Blast Protection, Safety Barriers, Operational Efficiency, Legal and Regulatory Compliance.
@@AC35K this incident definitely raises doubts whether a wall should be there or not now
@BTSArmy-jp7ch I understand your thought process, but some airports, such as Fort Lauderdale in America, have a wall immediately after the runway, not 300 meters away. The question is not about the wall, but why the plane was so fast with no flaps or gear deployed.
@@AC35K what he meant is ideally the wall should be kilometres from the runway. security is very important but accidents are worse
@izzypaynee You don't have infinite space. The runway itself is long enough, and no plane should ever go past the run off area.
Looks like the engines remained running - it didn't slow down at all...
you can see the thrust reversers are open
Yes, a plane can stop even if the landing gear fails and the engine is off, but it depends on several factors and requires careful handling by the pilots:
1. Aerodynamic Drag and Friction:
Without landing gear, the plane would slide on its belly, which creates friction with the runway surface. This friction helps to slow down the aircraft.
2. Emergency Braking Systems:
Modern aircraft have redundant braking systems, including hydraulic or manual backups, which can assist in slowing the plane even without engine power.
3. Reverse Thrust Unavailable:
With the engines off, reverse thrust (a common way to decelerate) won't be available, so braking and drag will do the job.
4. Runway Conditions:
The runway's surface plays a critical role. A long, dry, and smooth runway provides better deceleration compared to a wet or icy one.
5. Speed and Weight:
The plane's speed on touchdown and its weight will affect how quickly it can stop.
6. Pilot Skill and Procedures:
Pilots are trained to handle such emergencies using techniques like belly landings. They rely on specific protocols to ensure a safe stop.
While a plane without landing gear may stop safely, the scenario can lead to significant damage to the aircraft and potentially pose risks to passengers and crew. Emergency services are usually on standby in such situations to assist.
So you cannot say that the engines remain running 🙂
They're in reverse thrust
it seems it slightly flew along the runaway.bc of wrong direction of wings.
I don't see the landing gear.
Praying so much for those who have lost loved ones and those injured too🙏🙏🙏
How awful 😢 Poor souls 💔
Why was this plane with gear maintenance issues allowed to fly? Somebody allowed it to take off and when allowed to land by flight ops, no foam in the ground, it was allowed to land. The planes are being pushed and this plane should have been grounded.
money
ॐ शान्ति ॐ।दुर्घटना में मृत हुए लोगों को भगवान शान्ति दें।ईश्वर घायल लोगों को शीघ्र स्वास्थ्य लाभ प्रदान करे।
Why are there almost always obstacles pretty much immediately after the runway ends? Horrible design. So many lives lost planes hitting into buildings, fences etc.
It's within regulations. After RW19 there is a 50m run off area filled with gravel and a total of 300m until the brick wall which is there for various reasons.
(Noise Mitigation, Security, Environmental Protection, Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Control, Wind and Jet Blast Protection, Safety Barriers, Operational Efficiency, Legal and Regulatory Compliance.)
It's within regulations. There is a 50m run off area filled with gravel after the end of RW19 and a total of 300m until the brick wall.
So this is 100% your fault then, will you be going to Korea and turning yourself in to the authorities there? Or will you surrendering in your home country for extradition?
The better question is why was the plane still moving so fast at the end of the runway? This does not look like a short runway. There is more to the story here.
Many reasons I can't list off. Runways are mainly designed for wind directions, which is important for landing and taking off. Real question is, how and why they overran the runway?
RIP for all precious souls we lost 😔
y there was no speed reducing traps ? that was collide with wall
what do you mean
@@CadetAirmanRickyblud thinks the runway is an aircraft carrier
@@CadetAirmanRicky typically there's gravel/sand in the run off area after the runway- so planes can be forced to a stop if landing gear fails.
@@Mr.Yoshi20 what can we expect from you. There should be ample space for the gravel after the runway ends. They could have been saved if there wasn't a wall right there
No every airport can have that because not every runway has space for it.
BRO WHY IS IT ALWAYS BOEING😔😔 RIP TO LIVES LOST.😭😢
An A320 wouldn't have performed much better in such a situation. The better question is: why were no flaps deployed, why wasn't the landing gear working, and why was it so fast at the end of the runway?
@@AC35K Airbus would've never had the landing gear issue so it would've landed
@@AC35K Maybe a total loss of hydraulics.
@@cloudnine4095 True that, but even a 737 can gravity drop a landing gear
@@MrWhiterunGuard gravity drop
a few days ago Azerbaijan airlines, and now Korea. So sad(((
Very sad. Muan Airport has a 9100 foot runway which is ample length for a wheels up landing. One question I have is why the aircraft was not in landing configuration? That is, the aircraft did not have the flaps down. Even worse, the spoilers were not up up after it touched down. The reverse thrust on the right wing is functioning but cannot do much at this speed. I would like to know how far down the runway the aircraft actually touched down.
Is the flight model boeing 737 ??????
Yes, B737-8AS(WL)
@@안녕하세요-t9p6ddamnn it's not safe to fly a boeing. All boeing flights should be stopped
@@vish3190 Bro, maybe that's not Boeing's fault. Although I've never flown on any Boeing plane, I can say that Boeing is as safe as Airbus
@@sidenbldtho idk man, theres been some shady stuff recently with boeings, whistleblowers have came out and saying theres some serious safety issues with theses planes. Search up John Barnett, Sam Mohawk and Roy Irvin, they might change your perspective.
Bro these people have to stop getting on the bandwagon of “Boeings fault” this is something that was out of Boeing’s situation. Complete crew’s situation here, either they failed to safely land it (pilot error) or something even out of the pilot’s hands. We just gotta wait until the report comes out…
If there was no wall there…..the passengers might be alive….😔😔😔😢😢
I dont know with the money air companys have and airports have they put a fricking concrete WALL right past runway... If they have put at least 50 to 100 meters of sand right after runway that plane would have stoped there before going out. But a fricking concrete wall?? why?? cheaper??...
Rest in Peace everyone who lost theyr lovely ones and hope family sue not only the company but also the airport more than the plane company
walls are commonly used everywhere to divide up property that is not theirs and should not be accessible to the general public. if there was apartments on that other side and sand instead of a wall people would be complaining as to why they didn't use a wall. you are at the line of what is considered reasonable for a company to do. while you are at it you should also tell them to complain why they didn't hire superman to slow the plane down.
@@irregulargamer1352 Formula 1 and all car competitions have sand to stop the cars preventing huge crashes before hitting the wall so the driver doesnt die or get hurt. Why is not possible to do the same on airports?. Sand is well known to stop even airplanes like this on the video at that 250m/h before hitting the wall. But yeah i get your point its way too expensive to do that so customers pays less for the ticket that is
It's really saddening
They were probably getting back home to celebrate New Years with their loved ones...it happened in mere fee seconds...all cause the landing gears didn't worked. Maybe final inspection wasn't done properly...
1. Install additional tyre sets front and back.
2. Install asap, tyre cooling system and landing set maintenance check system.
3. Install runway temp sensor inside landing area and another at mid area
4. Install runway surface controlled mist or dew cooling system.
5. In front of similar walls in other airports, install metallic rope system, for emergency plane runway assisted braking and install F1 type tyre crash guards too.
Thank you for not censoring this video, as most mainstream media channels have.
CRAZY....RIP to those that didn't make it, hoping some miraculously made it through that crash, but hard to envision that happening. Horrible for the family and friends effected. Won't be flying Jeju Air in my lifetime!
RIP to the bird and all of the victims. You would think Boeing would have designed something already to protect engines against birds.
The Boeing 737 was slowing down nicely even with the belly landing until it hit the wall..
Without the presence of the wall, the plane would probably not have burst into flames.
Bad bad wall.
The wall is most likely there to act as a barrier from other buildings or highways. Not saying this is the case for this runway but most airports have some sort of barriers or large gaps to prevent further tragedy.
We need to know why is a wall there & it’s purpose & do all runways at that airport have a wall & if not, why was it cleared to use that runway.
Dumbass pilot that decided to land on a short runway with a wall. Incheon airpirt is huge and doesnt have walls and couldve easily and better accomadated the crash
Also could bave easily done a landing on water
Seriously stupid pilot
@@midnightsparesit was already well off the runway. What do you mean?
@ When a plane has no landing gear down, there are no guarantees a large airliner will stay on the runway.
Whys there a Wall at end of season runway?! The plane could of skid to a stop on dirt
Why are the words WALL and RUNWAY in the same sentence?
The country is already suffering from political crisis. Now affected with the deadliest plane crash of the year. Condolences 🙏
Safe Aviation is taking a hit...
Why the hell was there a wall next to the runway?? Unbelievable
Why was there a cameraman?
Isn't it bird watching？
공항 옆 식당에서 찍은것입니다. 반대방향으로 긴급 착륙하는 비행기를 보고 이상하다고 느껴져 촬영했다고합니다.
Who tf puts a brick wall right at the end of the runway????
It depends, there are airports with this, there are airports which have limited areas, but still pass the length checks.
Its just this time that it got messed up
they're there for safety and security reasons believe it or not, something obviously went wrong with equipment or pilots, it's very unfortunate
Boomers are stupid and ignorant.
Looks like this was a belly landing?? I don't see the landing gear.. yes, something was definitely wrong!
Your mum
btw it wasn’t a malfunction it hit the ground too hard or the tire just popped
Couldn't see the front landing gear.
Belly landing
1. With landing gear failure the aircraft must be diverted to the longest reachable runway nearby
2. It seems like landed half runway, go around and try again.
3. What that wall on the end of the runway using for, can someone explain
There is no such thing as gear failure. That the manual gear extension would suddenly stop working is highly unlikely
Everybody is dead , except 2 people 😢😢😢😢
I genuinely didn’t expect it to explode like that, damn that was brutal. Can’t believe so many incidents have occurred this month.
North Korea??
IN WATCHING THAT, i saw there was no way to brake but with flaps and reversers. The wall was inevitable. Without knowledge, would landing on the grass rather than a smooth hard surface runway have been better?
Why would anyone put a wall at the end of a runway...
179 confirmed dead. 2 crew members survived.
So sad rip all 💐
Receive my condolences to all the families of the victims From Kenya 🇰🇪 May God comforts you all During this hard time
there is no wall in between the runway actually the plane had landing gear malfunction and it was not landing at all without the wheels the flight ran on its belly all over the runway until it crashed over the outer fence placed in the airport
You can clearly see how it overshot the runway, over the gravel run off area. If you go on Google Earth, you can clearly see the brick wall it hit.
Heartfelt condolences to all those families who lost their loved ones and pray for speedy recovery for those who are injured!! God may the departed soul rest in peace!!! Prayers from Nepal
The plane hit a flock of birds and the landing gear malfunctioned.
What more will 2024 show us? My heartfelt condolences to the martyrs' families
May God have mercy on them All and Grant them the peace of Paradise.
RIP.
My sincere condolences to the Good people of SOUTH KOREA.
Rest in peace all beautiful souls❤
It's always December 😢
Aqellos diciembres aquellos diciembres aquellos diciembres que nunca volverán 🎶
I'm not sure if the crash was caused by a gear failure or pilot error when the pilots forgotten to put the gear down while landing on the runway.
Unlikely that the pilots forgot to put the landing gear down, there are lots of systems that activate when the planes GPWS (Ground Proximity Warning System) detects its low to the ground. The would have gotten "Landing Gear" and "Terrain, Terrain" warnings, as well as a really loud tone that activates when flaps are set to a specific setting with out the landing gear down.
Oh my goodness
So many comments on 'why is there a wall?' ok, go build a runway with no walls and see what happens 😅
Title not correct. 179 died only 2 survived. God speed to all those who passed in the horrible crash.
24-12-29 UTC 07:00 기준 사망자 수는 약 151명입니다. 현재도 피해자 수습중입니다
0:47
the year for aviation just got even better!
The issue was the wall. It would have slid safely with no wall
Fr
putting the wall there is just stupid
@ fr
The wall likely stopped it from going into a populated area
Theres no houses in that direction, only a field@nateg7100
Its horrible. It is not 28 dead but 179 among the 181 passengers
현재 소방당국에 의하면 사상자는 120명 까지 증가 했습니다.
이 사고가 일어난 이유가
조류 즉 새들과 엔진이 부딪혀 일어난 버드 스트라이크 인지
기계의 문제인지는 정확히 조사해 보아야만 합니다.
돌아가신 모든 분의 삼가고인의명복을빕니다
Why have a wall at the end of a runway ?????
@@johnwillis3421 안타깝게도 저는 항공사와 무관한 사람이므로
이렇다 라고 확실한 답변을 드리지는 못 할 거 같습니다
활주로 끝 즉 외벽이 존재하는 이유를 조사해 본 결과
항공기 이탈 방지:
* 활주로 이탈 사고 방지: 항공기가 활주로를 이탈하여 주변 시설이나 인명 피해로 이어지는 것을 방지하기 위한 가장 중요한 목적입니다.
* 안전 구역 확보: 국제민간항공기구(ICAO)는 항공기가 활주로 안에서 멈추지 못하는 '오버런'에 대비해 안전 구역을 두도록 규정하고 있습니다.
등 다양한 이유가 존재합니다
그리고 한국 뉴스에 의거하여
이 항공기가 부딪히게 된 둔덕은 규정을 위반 한 것은 아니라 사료됩니다
공항안전운영기준 제42조에 따르면 설치가 허가된 물체를 지지하는 기초구조물이 지반보다 7.5cm 이상 높지 않고 부러지기 쉬운 구조로 세워져야 한다 라 하고 있습니다
질문 하신 질문자께서 궁금해 하시는 벽의 존재의 이유는 다음과 같습니다
무안국제공항은 활주로 종단 이후 지면이 기울어져 있기 때문에 흙으로 둔덕을 세워 수평을 맞췄다. 로컬라이저는 활주로의 중앙선과 수직을 이루도록 하여 배치돼야 항공기가 제대로 활주로 중앙 정렬을 맞출 수 있기 때문이다.
라고 답변 드릴수 있을 것 같습니다.
다시 한번 돌아가신 모든 분들의 삼가고인의명복을빕니다
두번 다시는 이런 사고가 발생하지 않으면 좋겠습니다
감사합니다
@@johnwillis3421무안국제공항은 활주로 종단 이후 지면이 기울어져 있기 때문에 흙으로 둔덕을 세워 수평을 맞췄다. 로컬라이저는 활주로의 중앙선과 수직을 이루도록 하여 배치돼야 항공기가 제대로 활주로 중앙 정렬을 맞출 수 있기 때문이다. 라는 이유가 있다고 합니다
다만 항공업계 관계자는 “오버런 사태를 대비해서 로컬라이저는 반드시 비행기가 쉽게 뚫고 지나갈 수 있도록 만들어야 한다”며 “수평이 맞지 않을 경우에는 통상적으로 철골 구조물을 올린다”고 지적했다고 합니다.
Biggest question is why is there a concrete wall? No airport in the US used a concrete wall just in case of a overrun
Very sad 😢
RIP to all those who lost their lives 😢
하. . . . 말이 안나오네. . 😢😢😢😢
The plane clearly slowed down on the grass. Who the hell thought of putting a wall?! If there was no wall they couldve either survived or have lesser deaths.
Yes but the plane was very fast for a belly landing
Why landing gear not opened?
Failure or pilots were like “I hate life!”
This is because a bird strike occurred in the engine and a problem occurred in the hydraulic system.
Coulve manually extending the landing gear by the gear handle…
I think it's more of a software issue as well
I read that it was Boeing's plane. So......
Why would there be a wall right next to the runway?
so animals and people don't wander in and get pancaked by a plane
surprised they didn’t look for an alternative place to attempt the belly landing with there being a wall at the end of the runway…
So you know the reason for the crash do you?
Reports from Korean sources said the captain decided to abort landing after the bird strike and subsequent engine failure and loss of electronic and hydraulic controls. That's when it all went downhill. The time spent circling above the airport while the engine was burning after the bird strike caused toxic gases to fill the plane so the pilots were in a hurry for a second landing attempt. It seems landing on the opposite direction was intentional because some say there was a village on the other side. December is also the time when migratory birds flock to the area so it was all a combination of bad circumstances.
There's a big lake after the runway if you look in Google map. They could've done the water landing
Just a few thoughts on this as a fellow av-geek:
-First and foremost, my sincerest condolences, thoughts, and prayers go out to the victims, their families, and everyone affected by this devastating accident.
-Regarding the plane's speed, it seems far too fast for a belly landing. Typically, a much slower speed is necessary for such an emergency maneuver.
-Was this truly the only viable runway? Wouldn't it have been safer to divert to an alternative airport, like Busan's Gimhae Airport or Incheon Airport, which have longer runways and could facilitate a safer landing?
-I'm skeptical about the explanation that a bird strike caused the landing gear malfunction. Bird strikes more commonly impact the engines rather than the landing gear's functionality.
-This incident raises serious concerns about JejuAir’s safety policies. Are there adequate measures in place to handle emergencies like this?
The comment section is depressing. People lost their lives for god sake.
Stop trying White Knight the situation just so you can get some likes
I only see support wdym
Unfortunately kids have been consuming things like gore on the regular now since theyre raised on the internet, so they probably think this is “sigma” or some bs
And people goes up every second should I mourn for each one ?
@@ranjitmandal1612don't play dumb, u know that's not what they meant
What a terrible farewell to this year😢. Rest in peace to all those innocent departed souls🥺
이 사고는 bird strike에 의한 엔진, 랜딩기어 고장때문에 발생했습니다. 랜딩기어의 고장원인은 아직 파악중입니다. 동체착륙을 할만큼 급박한 상황이었을것으로 추측됩니다. 평소와 반대 방향으로 비상착륙을 하였는데 그 이유는 반대 방향에 마을이 있기 때문입니다. 사고가 난 전라남도 무안이라는 곳은 겨울에 철새가 많이 날아오는 지역이라 위험 가능성을 가지고 있는 곳입니다. 그래도 마지막까지 기수를 놓치지 않은 기장,부기장에게 경의를 표하고 희생자들의 애도를 표합니다. 생존자는 승무원 2명입니다. 다수의 희생자가 밖으로 튕겨져 날아가거나 불에 휩쌓였습니다. 너무 안타까운 사고 입니다.
@@oceanyt8 bs they were sit the back side
사고 현장에 새는 단 한마리도 보이지 않았습니다. 그리고 버드 스트라이크라 할지라도 저렇게 사고가 크게 날 일이 아닙니다. 저 공항 주변이 전부 갯벌이고, 그 갯벌에 착륙했다면 인명사고를 충분히 줄일 수 있는 상황이었음에도 불구하고 왜 속도가 줄어들지도 않은 상황에서 무리하게 그 짧은 활주로에 착륙을 시도했을까요. 이건 단순히 우연한 사고라고 보기엔 이상한 점이 너무나도 많습니다.
@ 잘못된 정보입니다. 착륙전에 사망자가 어머니에 보낸 메세지에 “엄마, 새가 날개에 끼어서 착륙을 못하고 있어”라고 보냈습니다. 무안공항은 바다 바로 옆인데 낚시꾼이 비행기의 반대방향에서 날아오던 새떼와 정면 충돌한 것을 목격했다고 합니다. 단, 랜딩기어는 엔진과 별개로 왜 고장난건지 블랙박스 분석 이후 결과가 나오겠죠.
@@jamsil_ghost 승객은 엔진의 상태를 정확히 알 수 없습니다. 사망자의 그 메세지는 이 사고의 원인이 버드스트라이크였음을 증명할 수 없습니다. 당시 상황을 촬영한 영상에서는 철새가 단 한마리도 보이지 않았고 엔진이 갑자기 폭발합니다. 엔진이 터질 정도로 심각한 버드스트라이크가 일어나려면 철새 무리가 전부 부딪쳐야 하고, 영상에 이 철새 무리가 보였어야 하는 것이 옳습니다.
@ 엔진에 연기나는 제보영상 하나로 무슨 판단을 할 수 있죠? 그 영상에 새가 없다고 버드 스트라이크가 아니라 확신할 수 있나요? 그리고 날개 앞에 앉았다면 버드스트라이크 같은 파손여부는 육안으로 확인 가능합니다. 모든 가능성은 열려있습니다. 우리가 섣불리 판단하는것은 옳지 못하지만 현재까지 정황상 버드 스트라이크는 높은 확률로 맞다고 봐집니다. 다만 버드 스트라이크와 별개로, 랜딩기어를 내릴수 없는 상황은 정비불량인지, 재차 복항과 비상절차를 하지 않고 동체착륙을 할만큼 긴박했던 이유가 무엇인지는 밝혀져야겠죠. 안타까울 뿐입니다.
Really sad to see RIP to all the precious souls
Another incident for Boeing…
Ah yes always blame Boeing -_-
@Planetrainguy It may not be their fault, I’m just saying that it’s curious how many Boeing accidents are on the timeline.
@DeltaXK144 there’s been a share of airbus and embraer recently
My moms friend was in the crash, 😢😢
RIP :(((
@@walter_248 😢
Could be poorly trained pilot working for a budget airline, or could be North Korean trained birds.
Internet has rotted your brain
@@justinhamilton8647 If you can't tell jokes from serious statements, perhaps it has rotted yours.
Analysis suggests that they hoped to make an emergency landing at sea near the airport, but due to insufficient distance, they mistakenly landed at the rear of the airport