MRI - MATRIX BACK TO BASIC

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
  • It’s been a while since I had a topic like this. Matrix is an important parameter when it comes to optimizing a sequence. I hope with this video you’re able to have a better practical understanding of matrix.
    Remember to check out and support my PATREON here: / bacmri
    Thanks for watching, following and support.
    #S_MAGNETIC_VLOG #MRI #SIEMENSHEALTHINEERS #MATRIX #MEDICAL_IMAGING #MRI_TECHNOLOGIST #MEDICINE #MRI_RADIOGRAPHER #MRIRADIOGRAPHER #RADIOLOGY #PATREON
    References:
    Luke Bergs - Tropical Soul (Vlog No Copyright Music): rb.gy/86ed

Комментарии • 64

  • @michelvandijk2745
    @michelvandijk2745 Год назад +6

    Love to see you explain WARP and VAT in what the technique does, and if it's really reducing metal artefacts.

  • @cw6360
    @cw6360 10 месяцев назад +4

    I love every one of your videos. They continue to help me and I’ve been scanning for 32 years.

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  10 месяцев назад

      Thank you for kindly words coming from someone like you with a very long experience in this field ☺️

  • @jasonparreno2245
    @jasonparreno2245 6 месяцев назад +1

    Thankyou for your videos 🙏 very informative
    Uhm quick question does it apply as well if you are scanning a small FOV part like an elbow?
    Should I decrease the Base resolution?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  6 месяцев назад

      Yes this is the basic of resolution.

  • @mirelamihaila1884
    @mirelamihaila1884 8 дней назад +1

    Hi. I didn't quite understand so if you reduce the FOV you have to increase the base resolution and the phase resolution also?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  8 дней назад

      @@mirelamihaila1884 ruclips.net/video/TENUK01boyM/видео.htmlsi=2S_pOgW7PTXe9sOZ

    • @mirelamihaila1884
      @mirelamihaila1884 8 дней назад +1

      @@Nguyen_MRI thank you so much for your help. God bless you🙏

  • @DrunkenViet
    @DrunkenViet Год назад +3

    Thank you for the these videos. I just transferred from X-ray to mri at the hospital I work at, and there is sooo much to know

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +1

      Yes it’s a never ending learning ☺️

  • @vickherrera425
    @vickherrera425 7 месяцев назад +1

    Crack 🩻✔️

  • @sumitkamble6897
    @sumitkamble6897 Год назад +2

    Very important vedio and very very thankful for you to make a vedio 😊

  • @Help.for.Radiology.Tech8367
    @Help.for.Radiology.Tech8367 5 месяцев назад +1

    Sir how to find out matrix size, formula?
    And
    What is mean by 512x512
    You mentioned in video
    And why write in this format?
    Kindly guide

  • @Nguyen_MRI
    @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +3

    Matrix. Is this something you have in mind whenever you optimize a sequence?

    • @aagoela
      @aagoela Год назад +1

      Definitely- would appreciate your thoughts on interpolation. I assume that’s why your video shows different resolution values for “acquisition” and “reconstruction”?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +1

      @@aagoela ruclips.net/video/GeRCRNspcRo/видео.html

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/o80w7-p1jOA/видео.html

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/n0zHyO1JXr8/видео.html

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +1

      I made several videos of interpolation in the past. ☺️

  • @zedrad1
    @zedrad1 Год назад +1

    I used to not worry about it because I was on philips and FOV and Res were unrelated you just imputed the voxil size you want. Now going to semins I have to think about it again.

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +1

      True. I guess you get used to it fast 👍

    • @zedrad1
      @zedrad1 Год назад

      sure do, Now I am having to learn Siemens all over again on the 3T Vida with the absolute newest version. Any pointers?
      @@Nguyen_MRI

  • @abrabr6720
    @abrabr6720 Год назад +1

    Thank you so much
    Great video
    Btw I totally agree with you, our Radiologist hate BIG FOV. We might get QA if we do so.

  • @sumitkamble6897
    @sumitkamble6897 Год назад +1

    Plz make one vedio for any MRA /MRV and how to set the measurement to both study.

  • @paulnoyal
    @paulnoyal Год назад +1

    Great vedio 👏Thank you

  • @fakenamefakesurname5005
    @fakenamefakesurname5005 Год назад +1

    Thank you for this video, so if i want to make the FOV bigger i also need to increase the base resolution in order to maintain the resolution

  • @TAHA-TOUABA-RADIOGRAPHER
    @TAHA-TOUABA-RADIOGRAPHER Год назад +1

    Thank you so much pro

  • @dr.magnet9033
    @dr.magnet9033 Год назад +1

    Yes, that's what I'm thinking.)

  • @iracvillar5576
    @iracvillar5576 Год назад +1

    with the same pixels , what is your perception between higher or lower fov compared to the image quality?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +1

      From my opinion I want dedicated fov for area of interest.

  • @arunssarun6542
    @arunssarun6542 Год назад +1

    Pls do one video of functional mri

  • @atle5522
    @atle5522 Год назад +1

    Thanks very much!

  • @sheikhatif9022
    @sheikhatif9022 Год назад +1

    i love yours videos ❤️❤️

  • @genesioban86
    @genesioban86 18 дней назад

    Valeu!

  • @sumitkamble6897
    @sumitkamble6897 Год назад +1

    Thank you so much

  • @sumeshraj7487
    @sumeshraj7487 Год назад +1

    Can you please tell me how do we decide frequency direction for each plane?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад

      Depends on what you are imaging and what plane you’re at.

  • @selimakko9811
    @selimakko9811 Год назад +1

    👍🏻

  • @MAMOUNALHALABY
    @MAMOUNALHALABY Год назад +1

    Thank you so much all videos
    Can you please send the educational website of Siemens company, on which this video was designed

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +2

      You find more educational content here: pep.siemens-info.com/en-us/404
      These video was design by me. Not with the vendor.

    • @MAMOUNALHALABY
      @MAMOUNALHALABY Год назад +1

      @@Nguyen_MRI
      Thanks
      What I need is to work on the ringer as an external app to do some testing. Not having a patient

  • @lmuscae1
    @lmuscae1 Год назад +1

    Off topic. this is siemens nomenclature....T1 TSE COR P2 320. What does the P2 stand for? I have spent an hour on this and its driving me nuts. just need a nudge in the right directions and I can look it up. thanks.

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад

      Hi. P2 here means pat 2. Acceleration of parallel imaging.

    • @lmuscae1
      @lmuscae1 Год назад +1

      @@Nguyen_MRI Thanks! Your videos are great! I will spread the word!

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад

      @@lmuscae1 thanks for your kindness.

  • @aleiatar
    @aleiatar Год назад +1

    Hi Bac! Great video as usual!
    I just want to focus on the first comparison.. In my opinion the second scan is far away better due to the higher SNR (1,36). When you zoom in, it seems that the second scan has much less noise. So the question is, don't you think that is much better increase the FOV and the base resolution to minimize noise instead of having a tighter FOV and less base resolution?
    I mean, if the acquisition matrix is ​​the same, might as well have an image with less noise, right?
    (obviously without considering the increasing of the time of acquisition)

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +6

      Yes but it all depends on coils and radiologist preferences. Imaging dedicated organs from my experience they don’t want big fov even though the resolution is the same. Also for pediatric imaging. I made this video just for a better understanding of the relationship between matrix and fov. Of course all pro and cons but the theory and practice are there.

    • @aleiatar
      @aleiatar Год назад +2

      @@Nguyen_MRI of course you're right! Anyway is something I've never thought about... It's just something to keep in mind!
      Thanks for the reply!

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +3

      @@aleiatar me neither. No one told me this. I guess it’s an important key factor to keep in mind ☺️

    • @iracvillar5576
      @iracvillar5576 Год назад +2

      the resolution is the same, but in your opinion which is the best image without taking into account the fov?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +2

      @@iracvillar5576 for this knee I want dedicated fov of 150-160. But again I would have optimise other parameters as well. This was just a demo of the relationship between matrix and fov.

  • @devkgupta
    @devkgupta Год назад

    Best book to understand mri basics physics

    • @paulnoyal
      @paulnoyal Год назад +1

      1)MRI in practice by Catherine Westbrook
      2)MRI from picture to proton

  • @anniesshenanigans3815
    @anniesshenanigans3815 Год назад

    I guess my hearing is bad, because I did not follow what you meant about the image (looked like a wrist).

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +1

      Thanks for tuning in on my channel. I don’t think your hearing is bad. Probably my English also not an easy topic. Nevertheless, many great books out there to read for a better understanding. It’s for sure a knee which I demonstrated in this video.

    • @devkgupta
      @devkgupta Год назад

      Best book to understand mri basics physics....

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Год назад +1

      @@devkgupta there isnt just one. but many. here are some: www.amazon.com/MRI-Picture-Proton-Donald-McRobbie/dp/1107643236/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1E9SCCU8ZPXUA&keywords=from+picture+to+proton&qid=1680512252&sprefix=from+picture+to+proton%2Caps%2C161&sr=8-1
      www.amazon.com/MRI-Practice-Catherine-Westbrook/dp/1119391962/ref=sr_1_3?crid=202ER43DIEE8O&keywords=westbrook+mri+basic&qid=1680512271&sprefix=westbrook+mri+basi%2Caps%2C158&sr=8-3