First 5 seconds in I go "yeah, I can see the difference, the right is clearer and 4K". Then I looked at the bottom and realized it was the DLSS... mind blown.
The fact that DLSS Performance looks better makes this downright sad and unfair. AMD may never truly be able to compete. I only wish more all games supported DLSS.
Well technically u can, go to control panel and enable DLDSR, it’s basically using tensor cores to generate your NEW display output it’s a piece of tech, and it does look much more sharper and pleasingly natural than expected, u can run it at your own slider setting for sharpness, but if u ask me, definitely run it at its possible low setting, so zero sharpness, it’s already adding enough sharpness in post with the tensor cores u don’t need a really add more anyway, it’s plentiful
bro dlss is killing feature for nvidia. I don't see any reasons to not use it even on 4090, since even this graphics card can't run 4k 120fps with ray tracing, if rtx 4090 could run any game at 4k 120fps with rt, then I would say dlss isn't required for this card
Key findings: -I know I'm a bit late here but my gosh DLSS looks good in Death Stranding. It's definitely worth turning on, most of the time I'd be hard pressed to find any discernable difference. -You can notice certain thin hair strands being slightly more aliased with DLSS but on the flip side DLSS does a better job of cleaning up moire patterns such as larger sections of the character's hair and fabric patterns. -Sometimes DLSS performs better, sometimes native when it comes to AA. -I'm certain that in quality mode DLSS would look better than native because of the slightly better AA. But there really is no need to go above performance at 4k unless you have performance to spare. -Performance wise the savings are significant, although perhaps not as large as I expected. During gameplay you do get a slightly better performance ratio with DLSS.
There's some on the distant floaty thingys like Alex from Digital Foundry highlighted at launch. Fine, far away particles on high contrast backgrounds are DLSS' Achilles heel. It's nothing major but I am going to see if changing the plugin helps like it does in ghostwire. I've tried a couple of plugins so far but no real change. If I find one that works I'll make a video on it!
This theoretically not be possible, something's amis with the game. Only thing I can think of is maybe the game has some bad default AA and so obviously DLSS is gonna look better. Like a RDR2 situation. I was thinking at first maybe DLSS is just over-sharpened, but that can't be the case because the Native 4K just lacks clarity.
dlss quality is very nice but when u can see the difference is in the hair and also at some blurry effects like the win in spiderman remastered it still needs learning, after dlss 4, we wont need to play at native anymore
Are you absolutely positive about which one is which? Because I'm pretty sure that whatever those lights are in the background aren't supposed to go in front of her face at 1:20
I can only pick one? I'd have to go with HZD, it's the only way to prevent shimmering on the grass as the game's TAA is very weak. Nothing is perfect though, and DLSS's stronger TAA does blur the image more but nothing a strongish sharpening pass can't fix. Cyberpunk is also great in the sense that the game's performance is linked strongly to resolution and DLSS enables the use of RT at playable framerates. If I had to nitpick there is some ghosting on car wing mirrors though. Guardians of The Galaxy is a similar situation, very resolution bound so DLSS helps a lot there. You couldn't run Minecraft RTX without something like DLSS so it's pretty great there too. Alan Wake remastered's DLSS lets me run the game at 5k resolution in performance mode. So it goes from 1440p-2880p and then back down to my 1440p monitor resulting in a ludicrously clean and stable image. Unreal Engine games can be hit and miss, DLSS deals with most of the grainy, shimmeryness the engine has on the one hand but it can cause ghosting issues. I know a lot of RUclipsrs highlight Control for DLSS but I haven't tried it myself yet, i've only played that on Xbox which already looked excellent. I'm sure there are obvious one's I've missed though. Most DLSS implementations are great, it's only really the odd ghosting that's an issue, also when a game doesn't have a built in sharpening setting- Yes I realise the irony that HZD doesn't have one whilst DLSS is enabled. :)
@@fpstechtesting7653 Thanks for the response, seeing how FSR 2.0 and TSR compare with DLSS so far makes it even more impressive in my eyes. DLSS seems to lack the chunky breakup alot of reconstruction methods have, atleast from what I've seen on RUclips comparisons. Control is the one game where il probably be impacient and play before my new PC, 900p TAAu-ed up to 1080p at 60fps with medium to high looked great.
@@DigiTensei pause at 0:50, look at the woman's tiny hair strands. Dlss works fine on flat texture but not when theres a finer detail like this (moving grass and hairs are especially problematic). Common issue with any kind of sharpening method
First 5 seconds in I go "yeah, I can see the difference, the right is clearer and 4K". Then I looked at the bottom and realized it was the DLSS... mind blown.
Same.
DLSS works wonders at 4K and it makes it quite achieve able to run games at 4K. The free anti aliasing is nice too.
Same thing happened to me
What you mean?
What? Exactly the opposite for me when i looked at the beard
The fact that DLSS Performance looks better makes this downright sad and unfair. AMD may never truly be able to compete. I only wish more all games supported DLSS.
Well technically u can, go to control panel and enable DLDSR, it’s basically using tensor cores to generate your NEW display output it’s a piece of tech, and it does look much more sharper and pleasingly natural than expected, u can run it at your own slider setting for sharpness, but if u ask me, definitely run it at its possible low setting, so zero sharpness, it’s already adding enough sharpness in post with the tensor cores u don’t need a really add more anyway, it’s plentiful
@@jeffrey1296-rl1miI personally have smoothening slider to 90% cause any less than that looks oversharpened to me.
This entire time I thought the right side looked better. And then I look at the bottom and my mind is blown.
I suspect dlss isnt being used. None of the dlss draw backs are present.
cause DLSS aliasing solution is better than native 4k with TAA+FXAA combined
bro dlss is killing feature for nvidia. I don't see any reasons to not use it even on 4090, since even this graphics card can't run 4k 120fps with ray tracing, if rtx 4090 could run any game at 4k 120fps with rt, then I would say dlss isn't required for this card
Key findings:
-I know I'm a bit late here but my gosh DLSS looks good in Death Stranding. It's definitely worth turning on, most of the time I'd be hard pressed to find any discernable difference.
-You can notice certain thin hair strands being slightly more aliased with DLSS but on the flip side DLSS does a better job of cleaning up moire patterns such as larger sections of the character's hair and fabric patterns.
-Sometimes DLSS performs better, sometimes native when it comes to AA.
-I'm certain that in quality mode DLSS would look better than native because of the slightly better AA. But there really is no need to go above performance at 4k unless you have performance to spare.
-Performance wise the savings are significant, although perhaps not as large as I expected. During gameplay you do get a slightly better performance ratio with DLSS.
what about ghosting? have you noticed any while playing with dlss on?
There's some on the distant floaty thingys like Alex from Digital Foundry highlighted at launch. Fine, far away particles on high contrast backgrounds are DLSS' Achilles heel. It's nothing major but I am going to see if changing the plugin helps like it does in ghostwire. I've tried a couple of plugins so far but no real change. If I find one that works I'll make a video on it!
This theoretically not be possible, something's amis with the game. Only thing I can think of is maybe the game has some bad default AA and so obviously DLSS is gonna look better. Like a RDR2 situation.
I was thinking at first maybe DLSS is just over-sharpened, but that can't be the case because the Native 4K just lacks clarity.
1080P upscales so much better than 1440p to 4k
00:27
The edge of this woman's face, if you don't see a clear 4k advantage, you have vision problems. (other 01:20)
When you say 1080P -> 4K are you talking about DLDSR?
Dlss
dlss quality is very nice but when u can see the difference is in the hair and also at some blurry effects like the win in spiderman remastered it still needs learning, after dlss 4, we wont need to play at native anymore
Why native use more GPU than DSR DLSS?
This looks like 1440p>4k dlss ngl.
feels like dlss 2 is sharper than native but i see a tiny itty bity more ghosting honestly barely noticeable though
Are you absolutely positive about which one is which? Because I'm pretty sure that whatever those lights are in the background aren't supposed to go in front of her face at 1:20
this is very useful, smart decision locking at 60 btw.
Why can u tell me what the deferent if he locked it or not…
@@a-s7179 good question
It shows usage, 83% native, 54% dlss, which means lower power consumption and lower temps. @@a-s7179
Cannot see any difference at all.
What game has the best DLSS implementation in your opinion?
I can only pick one?
I'd have to go with HZD, it's the only way to prevent shimmering on the grass as the game's TAA is very weak. Nothing is perfect though, and DLSS's stronger TAA does blur the image more but nothing a strongish sharpening pass can't fix.
Cyberpunk is also great in the sense that the game's performance is linked strongly to resolution and DLSS enables the use of RT at playable framerates. If I had to nitpick there is some ghosting on car wing mirrors though. Guardians of The Galaxy is a similar situation, very resolution bound so DLSS helps a lot there.
You couldn't run Minecraft RTX without something like DLSS so it's pretty great there too.
Alan Wake remastered's DLSS lets me run the game at 5k resolution in performance mode. So it goes from 1440p-2880p and then back down to my 1440p monitor resulting in a ludicrously clean and stable image.
Unreal Engine games can be hit and miss, DLSS deals with most of the grainy, shimmeryness the engine has on the one hand but it can cause ghosting issues.
I know a lot of RUclipsrs highlight Control for DLSS but I haven't tried it myself yet, i've only played that on Xbox which already looked excellent.
I'm sure there are obvious one's I've missed though. Most DLSS implementations are great, it's only really the odd ghosting that's an issue, also when a game doesn't have a built in sharpening setting- Yes I realise the irony that HZD doesn't have one whilst DLSS is enabled. :)
@@fpstechtesting7653 Thanks for the response, seeing how FSR 2.0 and TSR compare with DLSS so far makes it even more impressive in my eyes. DLSS seems to lack the chunky breakup alot of reconstruction methods have, atleast from what I've seen on RUclips comparisons. Control is the one game where il probably be impacient and play before my new PC, 900p TAAu-ed up to 1080p at 60fps with medium to high looked great.
I have 1080p monitor…can dlss help me in any way? Or do i need 1440p monitor anyways?
Well yes it will help but some games lost more quality...
Enable DLDSR.
what's the performance difference?
Look at the GPU usage
Rtx is watching you baby
I could tell immediately from the grainy hair. Its particularly noticable on thin structures, lile hair and wires.
No you couldn't lol
@@DigiTensei pause at 0:50, look at the woman's tiny hair strands.
Dlss works fine on flat texture but not when theres a finer detail like this (moving grass and hairs are especially problematic). Common issue with any kind of sharpening method
Is this DLSS Ultra Quality?
Performance mode, quality would be upscaling from 1440p instead