Plena’s sharpness is not razor-sharp, it’s good for a portrait, and the bokeh is the smoothest, which also looks great. All these lenses give a gorgeous picture in their own way.
It’s razor sharp. These sharpness results seem suspect to me as an owner of both the canon and Nikon. But I guess that’s part of the variability in testing a single copy of a lens. Or there’s some type of error in the testing methodology.
終於看到有人說了最真實的比較
Yea, I would love to see English subtitles. Also, was the sharpening slider in capture one normalized for the images from all three cameras? Thanks!
sharpening is setting as all zero
Ты молодец, хороший обзор. Намного лучше, чем у халтурщиков из petapixel. Странно даже, что так мало подписчиков у тебя
Everything that the Nikon does well, you think it's not important.
thanks so much for the review. can you please make a indepth review for the Nikon 200mm f2 too. cheers
背后的怪兽 是不是signs 105 f1.4?
135mm 我有两只，索尼和适马
你的小貓幫我選定鏡頭了
佳能一直都很强 只是被只看参数不拍照的人说的他很烂而已（重点是，他卖这么贵，必须得好啊）
Plena’s sharpness is not razor-sharp, it’s good for a portrait, and the bokeh is the smoothest, which also looks great. All these lenses give a gorgeous picture in their own way.
It’s razor sharp. These sharpness results seem suspect to me as an owner of both the canon and Nikon. But I guess that’s part of the variability in testing a single copy of a lens. Or there’s some type of error in the testing methodology.
とてもきょうみのある内容です。日本語の字幕がないので、残念です。
You talk rubbish my friend
You just not professional only think of the negative from Nikon
P.s have all these lens