Here's that free calculator: 🏡 Rent Vs. Buying Free Calculator: beacons.ai/humphreytalks/freedownloads Also did you love the new Outro? Lmk your thoughts!
You're not separating out principle from the interest. You talked about it later... Maybe show that calculation as well. Even your first payment has principle.
The problem with your opportunity cost calculation is that the whole value of the home grows 2% over inflation, not just the down payment. Then there's the fact that the mortgage interest payment goes down every year as the loan is paid off. So this 5% cost of capital should be even a bit lower if you factor that in. According to bankrate's mortgage calculator, the total interest over 30 years on a $500,000 home with 20% downpayment and a fixed 7% interest rate is $558,216. $558,216 divided by 30 years is $18,607 per year. So the cost of capital is really... Opportunity Cost of down payment: $100,000 x 0.07 = $7,000 Mortgage Interest: $19,000 per year on average, rounded Less growth in home value: $500,000 x 0.02 = ($10,000) $19k + $7k - $10k = $16k $16,000 / $500,000 equals 3.2%, not the 6.6% you conclude Then we should add in insurance which is typically around 0.75% So... 1.11% for property taxes + 1.00% for maintenance + 0.75% for insurance + 3.20% for cost of capital = 6.06%
How does the calculation get affected by paying less than the assessed value? We have a right to purchase agreement on our rental, which means we may purchase the house for a set price and pocket the extra equity. Since we moved in, our house is worth 25% more than the purchase price, so even with a miniscule down payment, we would not owe PMI. How then would the opportunity cost work?
Also, what about if i do not have a house and i need to pay the rental, in that case i think is better to minus the rental cost from total cost of capital.
This is the summary of the rent vs buy decision I’ve been trying to figure out for years. The rental income vs mortgage payment calculation never made sense to me. But this is much more logical and makes far more sense. Thank you for simplifying this!
Most people are unable to handle a fall since they are accustomed to bull markets, but if you know where to look and how to get around, you can profit handsomely. It depends on your entry and exit strategy.
The fact that the US stock market had been on its longest bull run ever makes the widespread worry and enthusiasm understandable given that we are not used to such unstable markets. As you pointed out, it wasn't tough for me to earn over $780k in the last 10 months, so there are chances if you know where to go. I hired a portfolio advisor since I was aware that I needed a solid and trusted plan to survive these trying times.
I tried looking into new strategies to profit in the current market because my portfolio has been in the dumps for the entire year, but everything I tried just seemed to miss the point. Please let us know who your asset manager is by name.
Insurance shouldn't be included or both Home and Renter insurance should be in the equation. You should be paying renters insurance. Renter insurance is usually cheaper, but also only covers losses.
Asking a real estate agent whether you should buy a home right now is like to asking an alcoholic whether they think you should have a drink lol. Homes in my neighbourhood that cost around $450k in sales in 2019 are now going for $800 to $950k. Every seller in my neighbourhood is currently making a $350k profit. Simply unreal. In all honesty, deflation is what we require. The only other option is for many people to go bankrupt, which would also be bad for the economy. That is the only way to return to normal.
Home prices will come down eventually, but for now; its best to offset some of your real estate investments and get into the financial markets or gold. The new mortgage rates are crazy, add to that the recession and the fact that mortgage guidelines are getting more difficult. Home prices will need to fall by a minimum of 40% (more like 50%) before the market normalizes. If you are in cross roads or need sincere advise on the best moves to take now its best you seek an independent advisor who knows about the financial markets.
indeed the mkt & economy has gone berserk, price of great assets like real estate, dividend paying stocks, or gold never comes down easily, in my humble opinion, buy what you can afford today, and working with a financial advisor certainly helps
I require suggestions on how to restore my portfolio and create more effective strategies in light of the huge declines. Where can I locate this instructor?
Same, I'm on a 25 year mortgage and it will be paid off by the time I retire. When I was 30 it seemed like an impossible dream, but my salary changed over ten years and I started saving bonuses for a down-payment because I couldn't save each month. 40 was the perfect time to buy and my friends who bought in their 20s and 30s regretted not traveling and living more when they were young.
@@annabarr1304 that’s a great point, my salary increased between 30 and 40 as well… That was a major changing factor, and I totally forgot that I had the opportunity to travel when I was younger and live in different places. Thanks for your comment, awesome and congratulations on getting a place!
The three main unknowns are: - future interest rates (as the mortgage can be bought back) - property price evolution - rent evolution This calculation is useful to compare the cost on the day you buy but without those unknown values it's impossible to know if buying will end up being profitable.
Great video as usual, but a major flaw here. When we buy a home with 20% down, that is a 5X leverage to start with (the home values appreciates on the total price of the home, not just the down payment). The appreciation on home price is protected from capital gains tax (up to $500K for a family), unlike a brokerage account. The leverage gets lower as the equity increases (but then, one has built equity...) Another great thing to like about mortgage payment is that it does not increase with a fixed rate mortgage, so inflation will reduce the actual cost of mortgage payment , as you mentioned...
As long as your salary gets adjusted per year. Same store, same bagel from 3 months ago went from 2.99 to 3.99..........in NJ. Your PI is fixed but your cost of living is not.
Have you paid taxes lately? This housing bubble has absolutely caught the eye of local munucipalities and cause taxes to skyrocket. Plus, inflation causes maintenance costs are also rising beyond inflation. I put 17% down and paid all closing costs in my first home. My actual taxes went up 13% the very next year.
Agree this is an important part that was overlooked in this video. Fair points below re. taxes also. My take away is that this is pretty complicated and case-by-case or market-by-market, and not easy to reduce to a simple rule
I was thinking the same thing about leverage. If you take leverage and avoiding capital gains taxes (if you were to sell) into account it significantly changes the calculation.
While property taxes and maintenance costs will increase over the years, so will inflation. I didn’t hear any mention of accounting for the expected increase in rent over the years in the comparison.
The non financial reasons for owning are what made me buy a property (currently in the closing stage). As long as I pay my mortgage, no one will be able to evict me and I can finally have a pet. Those 2 things alone are worth all the sacrifices I have made to save my deposit as a single buyer. And I can finally live alone and not share a house because my mortgage on a 2bed is cheaper than renting a one bedroom apartment
I thought the same thing and everything changed when the job opportunities plummeted near me. Found myself driving 2 1/2 hours each way to my job and home, and just couldn't sustain that. Eventually I realized my home wasn't ever going to be where the jobs would be. So, I sold my home and now I rent near where my job is, where I have no worries If I need to pick up and move again.
And when you get old and retired, you are going to have your home, this is why US have a lot of homeless, one of the reasons, they cant pay the rent, your home is yours, just pay the mortage ASAP enjoy!
Definitely mislead a lot of viewers on this one(I assume unintentionally). That Leverage(mortgage) is the biggest benefit in real estate for most Americans. They aren't getting 1.97% on 100k down, they're getting that on the 500k value of the house. This allows real estate to not return nearly as high %, while still giving the homeowner a greater return on their money. Combine that with the ability to write off mortgage interest, and it makes it much more likely that buying is more profitable than renting.
@@reecethomas1863 Yea but you also have to pay taxes on your market returns but not your house appreciation (most of the time). That more or less cancels out the lack of taking the interest write-off. But the biggest factor is the leverage, not getting that right is a major mistake and basically invalidates a large part of the analysis.
I was just about to bring up the exact same point. If you are getting a 2% return on the home valued at 500k and you only put 100k down. That means you get a return of 10% on the 100k you put down.
Hey! You missed a big one. Home mortgage interest and property taxes are deductible, reducing your tax liability. If you were to rent the home at the landlord’s cost (no profit), the renter gets to pay tax on every Penney of the payments. The buyer on the other hand has an income tax offset for all of the interest ( which declines under amortization) and the taxes (which increase over time at at least the growth rate of the home equity). I always refer to home equity as retained inflation. Buy the house for $500,000 and at the end of 30 years it is worth $1,500,000… 3 times the purchase price. Now, if you remain in the same market, what can you buy with the $1.5 million? You guessed it, the exact same house! Unless you move to a lower performing market which becomes a higher performing market, home equity is a fiction. Where home equity comes in to play is when the buyer purchases the home and the market prices grow faster than the buyer’s purchasing power. This is often the case of seniors who purchased a large home to raise their family and find that in retirement there is no way they could afford to purchase the home they now live in.
Here in Phoenix, the average price to rent has gone up 64% in the last five years. My home equity has similarly risen (67%) while my monthly mortgage has stayed fixed. That expense for a 2,100 sqft home is 22% lower than the median cost to rent a 2-br apartment, and it will stay relatively fixed even as rental costs continue to soar. It’s safe to say I’m comfortable with my decision to own.
Totally different in the rust belt, property taxes are extremely high and homes barely appreciate over time. I'd have about 400k more dollars if I chose to rent instead of buy if I just spent the money I put in a down payment into the S&P 500.
For someone not lucky to have been a homeowner in Phoenix prior to the inflation, it is cheaper for me to rent my 4/3 house than buy. (By about $1k a month)
Great for you but you don't compare apple to apple here. No one knows the future. You look at the back mirror and found that yours was fine. But for someone who is exactly at the point of making the decision, they can't be certain about the future of theirs
You forgot about the leverage that the mortgage gives you. The 80% of the home that you DIDN'T pay for with your downpayment will also appreciate 2% each year. A quick/dirty way to deal with that is to lower your mortgage interest rate by 2% in your calculations for rent vs. mortgage.
Loved Ben's video 4 years ago. This is a great update. A couple major points I don't think were touched on hard enough though: 1.) Closing costs, vary depending on location and sometimes you can get the seller to cover them but that is market dependent. 2-4% 2.) Home payments are going to stay roughly the same over time but rent also will increase with inflation. Not a great effect in the short term but a massive effect in the long term. This was touched on briefly but I worry most won't have picked up on this part. Both of these aspects mitigate the cost of the home the longer you are there.
When calculating the opportunity cost you underestimated the property appreciation. You multiplied $100,000 x 2%. = $2,000. However the appreciation is for the entire property value, so it should be $500,000 x 2% = $10,000. This is a 5:1 leveraged investment. So, the actual return on the $100,000 investment is 10%.
@@Paulhfoley You could instead take that 2% and use it in the calculation to offset the cost of debt calculation. So in his example, the cost of debt would be 5% instead of 7%
@@pirate9154 Property taxes in Florida a limited to how much they can go up per year because of the "Save Our Homes" cap so I call BS on that but we are having an issue with home insurance skyrocketing. I find it very hard to believe that your friends are actually paying more than $8000 per year more than three years ago though unless they own multi-million dollar homes in very high risk areas.
One thing worth thinking about is the product, vs just the cost of the product. In my neighborhood, 95%+ of homes are owner occupied. That means there is almost no rental availability. So if you want to rent vs buy, you might be looking at different neighborhoods and different quality of life. In other words, there are other variables to consider beside the cost of owning vs renting.
It is similar to the thought that home ownership is an important financial decision: but your home isn't just an investment vehicle. You actually have to spend your life there. People chronically undervalue their time. I am curious to see whether countries like Canada see an increase in brain drain again due to housing costs. Canada only has a few major economic centers so it is more difficult to "leave" the expensive markets. As such, those with portable skills will no doubt consider global options.
Is a good point, sometimes there are limited options in certain neighborhoods. Where I live most buildings by metro stations are rentals instead of condos.
That’s right, nutty, screwball neighbors living next store. Banging, and yelling all night! Rap music with a heavy bass booming at 2:00am. Every weekend, the cops arrive and you hear your neighbors getting arrested and screaming at the cops while getting tased. Then you start seeing hub caps missing off your car. Then a week later, you noticed your car got keyed all along the side of your car frame. You come home from work, your flat screen 20 inch tv is missing along with your speakers. Not only that, the thief was hungry and went into your refrigerator and made a sandwich and drank all your beer. You go into your bathroom, and you notice some asshole peed all over your toilet seat. Of course, owning a house in a nice neighborhood is the best choice. You get like-minded people like yourself, professional white collar workers who have to pay off a big nut every month but they feel it’s worth it living in a decent neighborhood away from the screwballs and the drugs.
@@waylorudd1128I’m pretty sure under 20% down you’re adding a mortgage insurance cost into your portfolio bro, and potentially a worse interest rate. There’s a reason ppl recommend at least 20% down. 🐖
The most important thing to consider is whether you plan on staying in that area or not for the next 7 years. Raise that number of years or lower it depending on the interest rate and base asset price. Opportunity cost can also hit you if you have an opportunity to earn double or triple the amount you make now, but you're anchored because of the mortgage.
I want to point out the fact that when you purchase a home with a mortgage it becomes a leveraged asset. That 100k down payment/ investment on a 500k home would have a higher return then 2% its actualy closer to 10%. The reason is because the whole asset of 500k is appreciating at 2% not just the 100k.
I was stuck on deciding if to continue investing or start paying for a house. I ended up selling my positions and the home turned out to be a fixer upper more than I imagined. I don’t know how long I can keep this up for.
Oh my. A fixer upper is never a good decision for a first home. I have been a landlord and property investor/agent all my life. Please consider making a list of everything that needs to be done. Then list the priorities. Priority items are only those that are required to maintain the integrity of the structure. Like roofs, septic, HVAC; the expensive stuff you can’t show off to your friends. From there look at your wants and save for those items. If you can’t cash flow it don’t do it. One doesn’t need a Bosch dishwasher. It doesn’t work any different and has poor repair history yet people will pay triple what they need to. It’s an ego thing. I made the mistake early on of spending too much money on what really amounted to decorative items. Now I set a budget and don’t do something unless I have the cash. Take a breath and do nothing for six months. You’re just weary. You’ll be fine. The goal in the end is to have a paid for house so you can afford to retire. And stay off HGTV! 😂🥰
If you've made progress, re-list the property accounting for that and pick a project that you can handle. Sometimes 2 or 3 people try to rehab the same property.
@@foley2k2 you’re so spot on with fixer uppers. I worked heavily in the foreclosure market. Probably 30% of the listings we had were homes that were partially rehabbed. Sadly, 30-40% were from medical care. People couldn’t afford to pay for care along with their housing.
I was tempted to sell just like you having lost a lot, which is over 50% of my portfolio I am seeking more effective investment approaches to scale up with in these times as I have read of investors making gains in a bear market.
When I bought, this calculation would yield about $1,270. If I bought my home today, it would be $2,278. My market appreciated over time, so if your area is an area that appreciates over time, and you need a place to live, in my opinion, your best bet is to just buy and hold for a few years and let the market grow over time while you gain more equity. Great video!
What happened with me is I ended up going through a divorce at the worst possible time in the housing market. It made way more sense for me to buy a $60K mobile home than to rent a tiny apartment for around $2K per month
Simply seeing the listing for a 2 bed/2 bath house set at half a million dollars made me realize moving away from the west coast was probably the single smartest thing I've ever done in my life.
There are pros and cons. I would want to live cheaper but in danger due to natural disasters each year that happen in the Mid West and East Coast. West coast, California, pays a weather tax since there are rarely no natural disasters that are catastrophic like elsewhere.
This is a good video and I actually made an in depth calculator for myself back in college. I would change a few things. 1. I would add insurance to cost of home you can divide it by 12 to get monthly cost your rent has this build in already. 2. HOA is becoming more and more common and these prices are not set, increasing a lot like, especially in condos, these also restrict your freedom on your house and could have fines. 3. Utilities there are some Utilities the owner has to pay no matter what, usually sewer/trash has to stay in owners name.
I can only imagine being part of a generation where home ownership wasn't only for the exceedingly privileged or lucky. It sucks how many people have basically no choice but to rent until they die.
@@Fishfood007 Firstly, I don't live in the US. Housing prices are in a horrific state all over the world; the US isn't special on that front. Secondly, "just move" is such a grossly oversimplified solution it isn't worth considering. There are dozens of reasons for moving to not be an option for a lot of people. Don't be dense for the sake of being dense. It's a bad look for anyone.
@@VirusVescichetta Might not be trying to be dense. If other things are more important to you than home ownership, great! Lots of people through world history have moved for COL/opportunity reasons, sometimes leaving family behind forever. It's worth at least considering.
As a life-long renter, I have always thought of my rent paying for my mobility. If the building where I live falls apart, or if the neighborhood takes a downward slide, I can simply pack my bags and leave. The worst that can happen is that I lose my security deposit. But if I owned a home in a neighborhood that started to decline in value because of crime or some other factor that would make it less attractive, I would need to find a new buyer to sell my house. And depending on the the cause of decline, that might not be so easy. I could be forced to sell my house for just enough to break even... or maybe even less than what I paid for it. And in an unstable economy such as what we presently have, home ownership may not be the most prudent investment.
Think from the emotional side... Owning a house is a big accomplishment. It provides a sense of achievement in life, as well as a free space of your own, a sanctuary. Go for it if you can afford it. Worth it.
I recently sold my home and, at 80 years, have moved into a luxury high rise1 bed apartment in Raleigh. The 1650 monthly rent is $520 less than my mortgage was. My apartment is across the street from the main bus terminal, so I ride for free as a senior and I can get just about anywhere I need to go by bus. So I save another $400 in car expenses. Therefore, those savings make up more than half the cost of my rent. Being in a very nice apartment I have maintenance free if I need it and access to a swimming pool and a gym and a game room and a BBQ area. I look forward to a very nice years I however many I have left. And I am not alone. My son lives10 minutes away my buddy family is 20 minutes away and my volunteer family is15 minutes away. I look forward to some satisfying and pleasant years.
Bought an old house for cash last year and am renovating it, mostly myself. No mortgage and cash flowing the renovations. Half way done, going great. One of the best things I've done in a while.
I tried to do this until I realized that all my renovations took so much time and were hard to do solo. Now I’ve been hiring out these jobs here and there. IMO home ownership isn’t that great with my skill set (not handy)
Another “cost” of owning a house is the greatly reduced liquidity of your assets. It’s very hard to access the 500k value in your home when you need it in a hurry.
This is actually a benefit for a lot of people. If they had $500k lying around, odds are they'd spend it all on the latest crypto meme coin or buy a Porshe/Tesla model X.
The inflation and the biggest stock market crash are ahead. You don't want to put all your savings into one basket anyway. I'm an immigrant to the US so as a child I had a luck to witness the life situation where all reg folk's savings went to 0 instantly (and nobody ever got it back from the bank or the government). All that people are left with were properties and land. Even 10 years ago everyone would think it'll never happen in US. But now... it personally think there is a quite possibility. The situation is horrible.
You mean your 100k. Since that's all you're putting in. Renters will lose everything else they put in. The 400K will be locked in until you sell. But, you can always get a HELOC for 20% of the value of the house.
@@markg-jw2hx yet if the price of these 600k houses drop to 440k, these homeowners will lose much more than what renters put in. Or if insurance doesn't cover the roof, etc cetera
I rent a house all to myself for $1000/month and I'm happy in my current situation despite not having the most modern home in Grande Prairie, AB, Canada. I want to avoid lifestyle inflation and money status as you mentioned in your previous videos so I will not go into greater debt. Canada currently has a mortgage and debt problem where the country's GDP is lower than the nation's debt, due to housing debt as well as vehicle loans.
Cool story bro. But if you have a house you can use its equity a lot. For example in New Zealand you can get 1% pa loan on an electric car (and save a lot of money) using your house equity. You can install solar, improvements etc at discount. You can ask bank for a delay payment for up to 3 months (good luck trying the same trick when you renting). Also you can do maintenance of the house yourself (and save a lot), or postpone the fixes during hard years and do it when things go right. You can have pets in your house. Rent payments can grow (and they do a lot) whereas mortgage is fixed (if you fixed it). Heck, you can even rent out a room or two (or AirBnB) if you find yourself in a hardship.
I own now and I have rented before but I personally prefer renting, life seems to be more fun when you rent, it's usually in a better area and you get to have a gym,pool etc.. don't have to worry about maintenance and you have the freedom to pick up and go anytime you want, also owning means most or all of your money is in the house, if rent prices wouldn't go up and was like a mortgage fixed for many years I would 100% rent.
Thanks for your very informative video. I never realized how much money we saved in interest by physically building our own home. We paid has we went. We never had a mortgage. While building the house we lived in a school bus converted into an RV. We paid only $75/month for the RV slot. It was a lot of work but so worth it.
Good for you! My ex-husband and I did this as well. In 1989 we bought 5 1/2 acres and lived in a 27 foot travel trailer for four years while building. Unfortunately we divorced. It cost us 240k to build our home. 10 years later when I bought my husband out the house was appraised at $1.1 million. I was only able to hang on to it for a few years then had to sell. I’m now in my 60s and renting. Take good care of one another and cherish your marriage.💜💜
I've owned before but currently renting. One significant flaw with owning is that you really don't reap the ultimate benefit (my opinion) until you sell it. So, if it's your forever home, what good is the equity? I don't believe in borrowing against your property. Now, if you're planning on purchasing an investment property (not your primary resident), then this changes the landscape.
That's a weak argument. When you retire you can sell and either downsize or start renting. If you absolutely want to stay in the home there are ways to tap the equity in the house without needing to sell. What I've done is use the home equity for the down payment to buy a rental property. We live in a time where money is going to lose value every year so it will make real estate more valuable.
@martinlord8837 I didn't mention this to create an argument. I'm just simply stating an opinion. It's good for you though to bring this up so others can explore options. I would imagine that many elderly people aren't willing to move, relocate, rent, etc., (hince forever home) and surely aren't trying to jump into some real estate business deals.
Bought a home with my fiance almost 2 years ago. It has been a great experience. Those maintenance costs are real though. We spent north of 12k on improvements. But it's ours, and at 3% interest, our payment is MUCH better now compared to the rent rates in our area and we never have to worry about moving.
From Leo: Home ownership effectiveness also depends on the building repair skills and work ethic of the owner. An owner that replaces his own roof, services his own plumbing and HVAC and does his own painting and landscape maintenance is easily better off owning. If someone with no skills or motivation buys a home and has to hire contractors for all those things, the added maintenance costs lean heavily against home ownership. Just like a mechanic may drive all year and spend less than one car payment for an unskilled person.
The landlord is going to charge for roof repair at competitive rates, so it's a wash. As a renter, if you're skilled in repairs, you can negotiate with the landlord for a reduction in rent for any repairs the renter performs.
Property tax and home insurance has gone up dramatically (ie. Florida) in many areas. Like rent, you can't always predict those rate swings. But with renting, you can always get out after your lease ends.
Your rent pays for property tax and insurance. If property tax and home insurance goes up, so does your rent !!! There is no way you can escape it: renting or owning.
@@markg-jw2hx agreed in principle, however if you're renting, you can downgrade to save money if renting, most people don't and it's not easy, but it's a doable option if you're money minded like that.
@@jth_printed_designs yes, very true, the bank will approve you for much more than a prudent budget will allow for. the bank is in the business of selling you dreams, and providing the finance for it.
Don’t care what anybody thinks. Owning will always trump renting a property. I dream of the day I can stop wasting my money renting and I can have a fixed mortgage payment for 30 years… A fixed mortgage is the most powerful weapon against inflation and the rising cost of living. I’ve been in my current apartment for 3 years. My first year I only paid $1400 for a small 1 bedroom. Today I’m paying $1750 for the same unit…. To renew again my apartment wants to raise me to $2000 within a span of 4 years. Owning is a must at this point. Don’t even get me started on building equity for doing nothing but living in a home…
Another point to mention is that if you sell a house in less than 4 or 5 years, you take a huge loss because the loan origination costs, purchase taxes and other upfront costs don't get averaged out (amortized) over many years.
@@CharlotteSoccerHighlightsthe original statement is generally true but you bought at one of the best times, values shot up, so, congratulations! Just keep this in mind in the future, prices will stabilize and if you buy during a flat or down market those costs may not be recouped easily.
The housing market is inflated and oversaturated with homes being on the market with astronomical price tags just stagnant for months. It is very clear that or generation will be likely one of the most devastating bubble pops in modern history. Seeking best possible ways to grow 250k into $1m+ and get a good house for retirement, I'm 48.
I don't think here is the place for personalized investment guidance. However, I suggest consulting with a reliable advisor like Azul to ensure appropriate retirement planning.
I’m closing in on retirement, and I have benefitted much from using a financial advisor. I didn’t really start early, so I knew the compound interest of index fund investing would not work for me. Funny how I pulled in over 80% profit than some of my peers who have been investing for many years. Maybe you should consider this too
Thanks for sharing. I curiously searched for her full name and her website popped up immediately. I looked through her credentials and did my due diligence before contacting her.
What happened to SVB is really scary, and goes to show that no corporation, however big, is immune to collapse. I have always had a deep-seated mistrust for corporations. I have plans to pull out most of my money, but don't know what to do with $350k sitting idly. I'd like to go into the stock market, maybe. Any ideas?
All big corps are just a cohort of centralised system working together, and any damage to one can have a dangerous ripple effect on every other one. I learned a long time ago to not trust corporations. Most of my money is in the stock market and my businesses. I keep only what I need to spend in my checking account.
@@Erinmills98 Ironically, these are the conditions in which life-changing money is made by those who remain calm, patient, and take controlled risks. Volatility goes both ways. The banks are in a big crisis. The market looks very shaky. The bigger the red candles, the bigger the green ones. I have made over $280k in the last 4 months by investing through my FA.
@@IrenaDolinsek Oh, I'm not really in the business of giving financial advisor, so you are responsible for your decisions. But I have been working with Kathleen Yanelli Carole, so you could check her out and contact her, if you want.
In the long run is mostly always to own home. In the initial years when interest payments are high, rental costs may be higher, but after a few years, the cost of owning will likely be lower as your loan amortizes and interest payment reduces. Also, you are shielded from inflation ‘cost’ particularly for fixed rate mortgage. By year 30, you are paying very little in interest. However, rental costs will escalate almost annually at least by inflation rate, which will make rental cost in 30 years much higher.
I agree, if you’re going to stay in one place for 30+ years it’s almost always better to purchase a home. That being said the cost of equity associated home ownership also increases with inflation since as your home’s value increases, so does the opportunity cost of home ownership
You need to consider the fact that your rent will increase!! How are you going to find a place that won’t increase your rent in 30 years? The problem is people keep refinancing their loans. The very best is a 15 year loan, because the interest is lower. The ban k did offer me a 40 year loan....I only have 13 years left on my mortgage! A 40 year loan is real. The sad truth is most people never pay off their homes, and that is the REAL problem. Home ownership is the biggest difference in the haves vs. the have nots. When I first moved into my place, the place I was renting was $1,000/month, now those apartments are 2,500/month. So with buying I have a bigger place and I pay $1000 less than what I would be paying in rent.
@@humphrey 1) Intangible happiness and satisfaction of owning/being fully responsible where you live. 2) Greater freedom in planning and designing updates/renovations/etc. 3) You're going to be paying to live somewhere anyway, so you might as well keep in equity some of the money you spend. If you can afford it or it's feasible of course. You're still paying property taxes, updates, utilities, etc in your rent, it's just hidden and not your direct responsibility.
Sorry Humphrey, Even if Median home price apreciation is 2%. By using a mortgage you are leveraging the return 5x. Meaning your return on investment is 10% not 2%. This changes everything. Canada also offers first time home buyer program where you need only a 5% downpayment. Effectively giving you 40% ROI. Not to mention there are ways to buy a house without a downpayment like having a parent or friend co-sign.
In my province, the maximum duration of a mortgage is 25 years; and it can only be fixed for five years. You need to regenociate your rate every five years.
In your example, the 2% home price appreciation would be based on $500,000 or $10,000 a year. Also, you can refi when rates go down. Based on my experience, rent goes up every year, especially with Wall St. owning more SFHs. Just some other things to consider.
not for my friend who has rented same apartment for 20 years and they only raised his rent a tiny amount. He was paying 500 now paying 1k a month compared to new tenants paying 1500/month downtown Sacramento, CA area.
@@andyyoo2948 I think that is a great point. However, each individual's situation varies greatly. You could have a landlord that owns only one or two properties or a company who owns thousands. The individual owner may value occupancy over greater profit margins like the company because they want to decrease their risk. This could mean lower increases over time for a renter like the commenter above. To your point, it may be beneficial to include an average rent increase so the average consumer benefits from being more aware. But I do think he roundaboutly addresses this by noting the fixed price benefit of a mortgage vs. the surprise/unknown timing of a rent increase.
Your explanation is realistic and straight to the point. l watch several video's on how to trade in the market but haven't made any headstart because they are either taIking some gibberish or sharing their story of how they made it. And l don't want to make mistakes by taking risks on my own
You buy a home for rent control. Staying in a house for 20yrs is a HUGE benefit when keeping the original mortgage cost. People get into trouble with homes like with cars... they always want to upgrade and constantly owe banks money instead of owning those assets themselves.
Yep, I bought my house 10 years ago. Looking at rental prices today, I would be paying DOUBLE my mortgage that I locked in 10 years ago if I had rented to live in a house like this. With rent your cost of renting goes up every year with inflation.
Love the video @humphrey as a CFP I do this exercise with clients all the time. Just one thing to remember when looking at the opportunity cost for the downpayment you can't use the historical average of the S&P 500 as it is an index of 500 stocks. The vast majority of ppl would never qualify under KYC rules in a portfolio or ETF of 100% stocks, they don't have the risk profile to do so. Most are a moderate/balanced investor which would be a 60/40 or a 70/30 split between stocks and bonds. That therefore would yield a lower historical average return than 100% stocks. Even Warren Buffett averages a 90/10 split. Otherwise great video!
Love the video and a great starting point rule. I did choose to buy even though more expensive because of forced savings and knowing mortgage payment does not change, both of which you mention.
What most people don't calculate in this equation is that you basically live rent free once you payed your mortgage. If you buy a house around 30, and pay a mortgage for 30 years that means you can live rent free during your retirement, which is worth A LOT, when you ask me.
Hey, great video! But there is a key missing component from the opportunity cost: houses are leveraged assets! A 2% return on home price with 20% down is equivalent to a 10% return in the stock market, because you have 5x leverage. And its equivalent to a 57% return on the 3.5% minimum down for FHA loans (100/3.5 = 28.5x leverage). That leverage changes over time as you gain more equity, but early on its relatively flat because of the amortization schedule.
I imagine the 7% comparison in the video is just putting your down payment in a managed broker, or an index fund tracking S&P500, with no leverage. As soon as you make the comparison against a more involved trading situation, it's no longer a heuristic.
Looking around it seems like historical average annual real estate returns are anywhere between 1% and 6%, but the last couple of years have had on the order of 20% spikes, so expecting more significant increases in the near future seems unwise. Not to mention, we are approaching new records and thresholds in housing affordability and availability, along with new-ish wide-scale real estate investment situations (record corporate ownership). As paired with every piece of economic advice: past results do not guarantee future results.
I realized this many years ago, my rent was basically lower than my loan interest on a typical property that I wanted this didn't include the cost of maintenance and taxes, I put that saving plus my normal savings aside, I admit that it wasn't my intention but I ended up with no loan home, my income increased over time and my partner helped as well.
The opportunity cost needs to be adjusted to only reflect the difference between the returns of the property versus what you were expecting from another opportunity. You also have to realise that your deposit is considered leverage to give you access to earn returns on money that isn’t even yours
I think something people don’t often think about when thinking about buying a home instead of renting is the difference in cost of electricity. Air conditioning a 1800sqft home is significantly higher than a 900sqft apartment and should be considered as well. Especially if you don’t have shade on your home or if your home is facing west where the sun is going to set everyday
You’re comparing apples to oranges though. To get an accurate assessment on the rent vs. buy situation, you should be comparing equally sized homes. Otherwise, the comparison can be highly skewed. For example, if taken to the extreme, you could say buying is never worth it because a mansion’s property taxes and utilities alone is more than it costs to rent a one bedroom apartment.
@@alecgalbraith5604 In my state, usually when people go from an apartment to a home, they are not going to buy a home that is the same sqft as their apartment. I can’t speak to how it is in other states. 900sqft homes don’t really exist here.
@@MadisonFalcoFoods Good observation, neither is an apartment. Point is, a 900sqft apartment is comparable to a 900sqft condo in terms of electricity in the context of your original comment
There is a very key error here at around 4:40. The real estate return home price return is 2%, but the stock market return is 7%. But you have to multiply the down payment by the leverage. So if you have a $100,000 down payment on a 500,000 home, what is growing at 2%? The home price! Not the down payment. So .02 * 500k is 10,000. That means your investment went from 100,000 to 110,000, or 10%. So the true return on a home is 10%, not 2%. This matters a great deal.
this is absolutely true. however, if you want to keep an apples to apples comparison then the renter needs to be given a $400,000 investment loan to match what the owner gets. This obviously seems very unlikely in reality. The real argument here is that a mortgage makes available HUGE leverage, that a renter otherwise wouldn't have access to.
@@iownahahaNot only that, but you also need to factor risk into the equation. There is significantly less risk in the S&P500 then there is in a piece of real estate that is leveraged 5x. Risk adjusted rate of return is what should be compared.
Not sure if this has been mentioned, but as far as the opportunity cost of sinking 100k into the s&p at 7% compunded over that 30 year mortgage =761k. Not to mention the "opportunity cost" of being limited on mobility i.e. better opportunities elsewhere or shopping for cheaper rents in changing needs. Moving closer to job opportunities. Freedom to relocate to lower cost areas or higher pay jobs etc. Just food for thought. I would assume a good portion of buyers wouldn't stay in the same house for 30 years to take advantage of the amortization interest curve, or be roped into a refinance after
I feel like one thing people aren’t talking about is all the repairs to keeping your home up to value and the amount of money you have to put in especially if you plan on moving out. For example, you need to buy a new roof that’s 20k you no longer have and since you don’t plan on selling the roof that isnt going to be an asset you cab liquidate
I bought an older home (1956). The previous owner tried to do everything themselves so lots of things are held together with gum. We’re spending about $500-1,000 a month fixing things. On the long run it’ll pay off but in the short, owning is DEFINITELY not cheaper than renting. Don’t go in thinking that or you will lose your shirt.
Do they just break on their own? Maybe it is because you are overusing your home appliances? Showering and watering too long, leaving electricity on when not needed, flushing the toilet too much. Maybe opt for a grass-free garden, change your landscape to natural native plants that are drought resistant. Live a minimalist lifestyle. Why do you incur high costs with fixing things?
@@bryan_witha_whyy Well, I rather buy nothing for this reason. I still do not understand how things just break down. Maintenance and having things are a headache because they become part of your life. Hence, why I always hear my damn neighbors everyday just working on their homes. The noise of machinery for me is sickening when I was in the US. Do you live in a high maintenance home? I try to avoid those when I will buy a home. In Japan, homes do not break down but we also live minimally and smaller homes.
@@jacqueslee2592 Things break, mechanicals need parts. A house takes a beating. It takes work and money to keep it up. That’s why I think most people should just rent.
Bought our home for $310k in KS in early 2019...it is now worth close to $500k and our rate is 2.375%. If we had decided to wait buy a house today, our payment would have went from $1550 on a 15-year note to about $2900ish house payment on a 30-year fixed. 🤯
If you take into account the space (in square feet) then renting looks way less attractive. Sure, you could pay $2000 in rent… for a basement or half a basement (if you live in Canada). And no garage. Just a spot on the street. And if you rent half a basement, guess what? You get a random person as a roommate. Whether you want them or not. Whereas the $400,000 home could include 3 stories and a garage and that’s all yours.
I'm glad you mentioned the amortization curve. In theory you could take your total interest payment and the total investment in the house and run a weighted average cost of capital calculation. I think an even better way (something I'm working on) is to spreadsheet out and simulate the year-by-year cash flows, including taxes, and providing a year-over-year picture of what your portfolio would look like along with your net worth.
If you know how to fix or enjoy working on carpentry, plumbing, electric, HVAC, buy. If you don’t know how to do any of those things, rent. I’ve been a home owner for only 2 years now and absolutely hate it. I miss the worry free life of paying rent and if something went wrong calling the landlord and it being there probably. I would trade my equity for peace of mind. Owning a home is overrated and stupid. I'm going to sell and go back to renting.
That spreadsheet is super nice to tinker with. Considering I'm someone who is still at the stage of their life where renting is all that really makes sense, this video is more of a helpful tool when it comes to road mapping my future plans rather than any current decisions I'm making, but it's super important nonetheless! Great video Humphrey!
4:43 you are missing the leverage in the calculations that you get with the mortgage loan. If the property appreciates by 2%, you make money on the value of the home not just on the down payment. So 2% will be $10,000 compared to 7% on S&P 500 with 100k investment.
As he says, simplicity and flexibility are big non-financial reasons to rent. Another in my experience is the cost in time to maintain a home. Before I boight my first house Saturdays were family fun days. Afterward they were work around and on the house days. This was no small loss (and continues 30 years later). Im glad we bought the houses we did from a financial standpoint but am less happy with the loss of time and family togetherness. Soon I hope to go back to renting and live a simpler, more stress-free life.
This video is balanced and almost exactly independently verifies what I calculated for my parents that are needing to downsize their large house to extend their retirement nest egg. The fact that Ben Felix is one of your sources is another huge witness to this objective video. Well done and methodical
Great content. I also first heard of this concept from Ben Felix and I have been wanting him to put out an updated version to reflect current realities (I also live in Canada). Thanks for adding to the conversation. Side note, it's funny how many times I've tried to explain this concept to friends or relatives whenever people ask me when I'm planning on buying a house. I'd say 99% of the time it's met with a blank stare and I get told I'm crazy for thinking renting is better than buying in my case because it's "dead money". I'll usually explain the math and the concept another time and again get met with resistance. The takeaway is in Canada (likely most places in the world) the idea that buying a home is better 100% of the time is so ingrained in our minds it is hard for people to seriously consider this idea objectively. FWIW I live in a very luxury market and rent my place for $900 all costs accounted for. If I were to buy in this area my monthly costs according to your percentage rule would be around $3000 a month. Cheers.
What got me when I was younger was value vs cost. When viewed per square foot, or per features homes are generally waaaay cheaper compared to renting an apartment. And that over time a larger portion goes towards principal, making a house a super inefficient savings acct vs "burning money" by renting. It was enough to force me into buying far sooner than I should have. Waiting another 2-3 years would have put me in a better spot overall because of everything stated in this video. Plus the issue of uncounted costs. If you are renting, you aren't going to dump money into improvements or customizations, or maintaining everything to as high of standards. And because rentals are typically smaller, there is less to maintain in the first place. This becomes a huge sink that home owners don't typically admit to.
This rule of thumb is good for a short time horizon of under 3 years. After that there are too many changing variables for it to remain helpful. The biggest factor in the rent vs. buy decision in the medium-term is the rate of home appreciation. I would generally not recommend putting 20% down unless you have really bad credit. We were able to put 5% down, saving us $45,000 on a downpayment and our PMI is $50/month (This was in 2021 so frankly a lot has changed). If localized appreciation is high in your area, your mortgage is leverage on your return of ownership. Our home has appreciated ~ $40,000 in 2 years, which is already double the amount of our down payment + closing costs. And I was able to leave the remaining $45K in the market so I managed to lose a lot of money on that ;)
@trenthorton9, Your home HAS NOT appreciated $40,000 in two years. 100% Fact your home DEPRECIATES 3.636% every year. The IRS even says it does. Google it! 10:07 A home never ever goes up in value. For a home to go up in value, you MUST spend over 4% in maintenance and repairs every year. If a home just goes up in value, there would never be any reason ever to replace or fix anything in your home! Ever! Right? 100% Fact! Everything in your home will eventually need replaced! This makes owning a home a bad investment compared to renting.
He failed to mention the evil Hoa fees, but that is typical, even experts don't calculate this cost. If you buy a crappy apartment "conversion" in Los Angeles, with paper thin walls and $500 per month HoA fees, that will mean you need to add $120k to whatever you hope to sell it for in order for you to make profit. So if you bought it for $550, sell it for $750, you actually only made $80k
I think for maintenance costs you should save 1% for every decade & 500k of the house. So if your home is worth 500k and is 10 years old, save 1% every year. If your house is 750k and is 15 years old, save 1.5% (1% for first 500k and 10 years + 0.5% for next 5 years and remaining 250k)
Technically your primary residence is not an investment, it is a liability, as it takes money out of your pocket, not into it. A better comparison would be a rental property vs the stock market. Make sure to factor in the tax benefits of a rental property and how that can offset W2 income
And you're technically wrong. A primary residence is an Asset because it provides a useful function. The paid mortgage principal goes into Equity because you now own that part outright, the paid mortgage interest and other fees that you'll never get the money back out of are Liabilities. Just because something has recurring expenses or costs more to maintain than it's worth over the course of a lifetime doesn't turn an asset into a liability in terms of accounting / finance, because if it still has use it's an asset with offsets of liabilities and equity. Now, depending on tax breaks, etc, it may be better strategy to have a rental property due to other benefits like you said, but you're simply wrong about the liability part. Might as well recommend depreciating land next and see where that gets you
@@hamartian_7979 those are valid points, but the main premise of my statement was more around the framework of comparing assets that actually give you a positive ROI, like what paper financial assets i.e. dividend stocks, bonds, etc provide vs a rental property etc. While I agree there is some equity you build, your primary residence does not provide a NET positive ROI on a monthly basis, so in reality it is a technically a liability. As such, the comparison between a primary residence and index and paper equities is flawed. If you are not getting positive cash flow on a monthly basis, it’s a liability. That is universal, it doesn’t matter what it is, regardless of the function you get out of it.
It's like saying a car isn't an investment but a liability. How are you get to work then? Walk? If you have a car, suddenly a lot of money making opportunities open up compared to walking. So, then it becomes an investment. Similarly, you have to spend money for housing. The choices are rent or buy. Comparing to rent, a house is an investment.
@@markg-jw2hx spoken from a car guy with multiple cars, cars are liabilities 99% of the time. Unless you are really savvy and know what cars will be sought after and in short supply in the future, and can actually sell at a profit ( including deducting maintenance from your profit). Function does not make something an asset, Cash flow does. That is my main point. You guys are focusing on the leaves and missing the forest
Maintenance costs (unless you have a brand new home) are drastically underestimated for current cost of labor and materials. Even if you assume no accidents, just assume best lifespan of appliances and materials on a home: New roof every 15-20 years? 30K. New HVAC every 10-15 years? 14k, flooring, siding, etc.. they all have lifespans under 30 years so expect to replace them in the lifetime of your mortgage. Don't forget landscaping either, most rentals don't expect you to landscape as the renter. Another note: Although mortgage can be more stable, don't plan on it staying the same. My home insurance (in California) went from $900/year in 2020 to $6,000/year in 2024.
If I were a landlord renting out homes I'd definitely include property tax, home owners insurance & extra maintenance fees in the rent; the renters will cover those cost. I don't get why people don't get that.
Also, I think you can rent a place for less than what you would pay for mortgage for that specific place you want to live in etc… but of course both have pros and cons:)
I’m also including the fact that I own more of my house every month. I locked in my mortgage below 3%, so I can never move. But thank you for making this video!
Your spreadsheet should add the average rent increases per year. Time the person plans to live there, say 5,10, 15 etc…then the total cost rent vs buy after you sell your home after some time.
A nice updated video! Though there's a few assumptions that kindof tip the balance in favor of renting, you covered the straight line interest effect, but another big one is: You didn't account for capital gains taxes. When shares are sold you'll be taxed on the increase in value, and on any dividends paid, where a house you live in will be sold without any capital gains. That 7% gain on market is much closer to 4-5% after taxes.
Nice video - you forgot though that the financed portion of the home appreciates, too (not only the portion your downpayment paid for). So even with mortgage rates at 7%, you should calculate 5% (7% mortgage rate - 2% appreciation).
2% per year for maintenance seems very high based on my experience of owning an older home. I've had plenty of issues I've had to work on but definitely not that much. It also implies that houses only ever break even because your 2% return on investment per year matches your 2% cost of maintenance ownership.
It's average over time and with fixer uppers included. Roof goes out, foundation bad, siding replacement, electric reinstall, etc. That'll all go well over 2%.
I feel like the majority of folks are overlooking the fact that employment pay is not increasing with these inflated home prices. We are at that point where everyone thinks they have these “high value” homes and it’s literally fake value numbers. This delusion that is going on will eventually implode and it’s gonna be ugly. Rent for now, pay off debt, live light and be patient. The “Jone’s” are gonna be called the “Brokies” soon enough!
I am renting a house in Arizona for $2400 per month. If I bought the same house and did $100,000 down my monthly payment would be $3800 per month plus all the taxes and maintenance costs.
Good starting point. Items to consider to improve true costs: You left out the cost of home owner's insurance. Closing costs should be amortized over the life of home ownership. It wasn't clear if the price appreciation was after inflation, which doesn't seem likely. You can actually lose money on home ownership. I basically broke even on 4 properties owned over 30 years. The real ownership plus for me was I was able to modify home to meet my needs as family needs changed.
@@joenunez938 my property I bought for 200k is now worth 900k in 23 years. Not sure how breaking even works over 30 years. I guess it’s the new math being taught? 🥹🤓
Being Canadian for me I knew it would be more expensive to buy then to rent but I also knew that as I pay down my mortgage, rents keep increasing Now 20 yrs later my monthly expenses reduced by half while rents more than doubled It’s all a matter of your own personal point of view & what you’re comfortable with :) Also, if you sell your principal residence for more than you bought it the difference is yours tax free, vs. putting that $ in the stock market will be fully taxable depending how it’s placed of course
owning home also has additional costs like decor, furnishing, appliances which aren't worth much when you sell it. We tend to buy extra things when we own. Also, as you pay down the mortgage, the cost of your capital stays about the same (S&P gain vs interest). Another thing, when we rent, we don't rent the same sized house as we buy. We rent smaller units. So renting is much less costly than the video presented.
As a home owner, this calculation is very useful. One thing to consider as well is that while renting, most likely, you won't have many utilities to pay. When you own the property, you have to pay for everything. That also varies depending on whether you own a condo or a house.
One thing that’s not considered is that the locale in which your fixed investment/home can change drastically. Neighborhood preferences can shift very quickly. Once pristine neighborhoods can become “blighted” and unsafe for a retired elderly person to live in. The blighted value of the property diminishes greatly and becomes a difficult item to market.
Solid informative video. Did you include the appreciation on the whole $500k value of the property and not just on the $100k down payment? 2% of the remaining $400k would bring an additional return of $8k. So the number would be $35.5k and not $43.5. This would make it 7.1% and not 8.71%. That would be $2,367 instead of $2,903. I may not have fully grasped the concept, but it did seem to leave out the appreciation of the entire home value.
All these videos and articles almost always miss tax savings which is much higher in ownership. You missed tax savings which is mostly mortgage interest is 100% deductible.
I love that Humphrey addresses the emotional component of the avg individual. A few things that finance ppl don’t address are: ability to renew lease is in most part dependent landlords renewing. Even if you are a wonderful tenant, your landlord may still need to sell and unable to renew your lease. Time/emotional/financial cost of looking for rentals, financial/time cost of moving every 2-3 years.
Here's that free calculator: 🏡 Rent Vs. Buying Free Calculator: beacons.ai/humphreytalks/freedownloads
Also did you love the new Outro? Lmk your thoughts!
You're not separating out principle from the interest. You talked about it later... Maybe show that calculation as well. Even your first payment has principle.
What about property insurance cost?
The problem with your opportunity cost calculation is that the whole value of the home grows 2% over inflation, not just the down payment. Then there's the fact that the mortgage interest payment goes down every year as the loan is paid off. So this 5% cost of capital should be even a bit lower if you factor that in. According to bankrate's mortgage calculator, the total interest over 30 years on a $500,000 home with 20% downpayment and a fixed 7% interest rate is $558,216. $558,216 divided by 30 years is $18,607 per year.
So the cost of capital is really...
Opportunity Cost of down payment: $100,000 x 0.07 = $7,000
Mortgage Interest: $19,000 per year on average, rounded
Less growth in home value: $500,000 x 0.02 = ($10,000)
$19k + $7k - $10k = $16k
$16,000 / $500,000 equals 3.2%, not the 6.6% you conclude
Then we should add in insurance which is typically around 0.75%
So...
1.11% for property taxes
+ 1.00% for maintenance
+ 0.75% for insurance
+ 3.20% for cost of capital
= 6.06%
How does the calculation get affected by paying less than the assessed value? We have a right to purchase agreement on our rental, which means we may purchase the house for a set price and pocket the extra equity. Since we moved in, our house is worth 25% more than the purchase price, so even with a miniscule down payment, we would not owe PMI. How then would the opportunity cost work?
Also, what about if i do not have a house and i need to pay the rental, in that case i think is better to minus the rental cost from total cost of capital.
This is the summary of the rent vs buy decision I’ve been trying to figure out for years. The rental income vs mortgage payment calculation never made sense to me. But this is much more logical and makes far more sense. Thank you for simplifying this!
Most people are unable to handle a fall since they are accustomed to bull markets, but if you know where to look and how to get around, you can profit handsomely. It depends on your entry and exit strategy.
The fact that the US stock market had been on its longest bull run ever makes the widespread worry and enthusiasm understandable given that we are not used to such unstable markets. As you pointed out, it wasn't tough for me to earn over $780k in the last 10 months, so there are chances if you know where to go. I hired a portfolio advisor since I was aware that I needed a solid and trusted plan to survive these trying times.
I tried looking into new strategies to profit in the current market because my portfolio has been in the dumps for the entire year, but everything I tried just seemed to miss the point. Please let us know who your asset manager is by name.
Her name is Rebecca Noblett Roberts. Hope that helps
Just copied and pasted her on my browser and her page popped up immediately, thank you for saving me hours of researching.
Don't forget closing costs (~4%) and home insurance (varies by area), that's money you'll never see again.
Add 40% if you live in FL,LA,CA…😢
And HOA, which cost has been skyrocketing
Also the PMI if using a FHA, using a conventiona is more expesnive, and they botched it in favor of people with lower scores.....
Insurance shouldn't be included or both Home and Renter insurance should be in the equation. You should be paying renters insurance. Renter insurance is usually cheaper, but also only covers losses.
@@chekcalbe add TX to that list. My home insurance is well over $4,000 year
Asking a real estate agent whether you should buy a home right now is like to asking an alcoholic whether they think you should have a drink lol. Homes in my neighbourhood that cost around $450k in sales in 2019 are now going for $800 to $950k. Every seller in my neighbourhood is currently making a $350k profit. Simply unreal. In all honesty, deflation is what we require. The only other option is for many people to go bankrupt, which would also be bad for the economy. That is the only way to return to normal.
Home prices will come down eventually, but for now; its best to offset some of your real estate investments and get into the financial markets or gold. The new mortgage rates are crazy, add to that the recession and the fact that mortgage guidelines are getting more difficult. Home prices will need to fall by a minimum of 40% (more like 50%) before the market normalizes. If you are in cross roads or need sincere advise on the best moves to take now its best you seek an independent advisor who knows about the financial markets.
indeed the mkt & economy has gone berserk, price of great assets like real estate, dividend paying stocks, or gold never comes down easily, in my humble opinion, buy what you can afford today, and working with a financial advisor certainly helps
I require suggestions on how to restore my portfolio and create more effective strategies in light of the huge declines. Where can I locate this instructor?
Her name is “Rebecca Nassar Dunne’” can't divulge much. Most likely, the internet should have her basic info, you can research if you like
Deflation usually is accompanied by falling wages and will make debts larger relative to income. You don’t want deflation.
I rented until I was 40, it made sense. But now I enjoy owning a home. I feel more financially stable now, with a mortgage😊
Same, I'm on a 25 year mortgage and it will be paid off by the time I retire. When I was 30 it seemed like an impossible dream, but my salary changed over ten years and I started saving bonuses for a down-payment because I couldn't save each month. 40 was the perfect time to buy and my friends who bought in their 20s and 30s regretted not traveling and living more when they were young.
@@annabarr1304 that’s a great point, my salary increased between 30 and 40 as well… That was a major changing factor, and I totally forgot that I had the opportunity to travel when I was younger and live in different places. Thanks for your comment, awesome and congratulations on getting a place!
The three main unknowns are:
- future interest rates (as the mortgage can be bought back)
- property price evolution
- rent evolution
This calculation is useful to compare the cost on the day you buy but without those unknown values it's impossible to know if buying will end up being profitable.
If you have a fixed rate loan, you can know for certain that your rate will never go up. But, if rates drop you can usually refinance and save money.
A few thousand upfront for security deposit and last month would be worth a couple of thousand if it was in the stock market over a handful of years.
Great video as usual, but a major flaw here. When we buy a home with 20% down, that is a 5X leverage to start with (the home values appreciates on the total price of the home, not just the down payment). The appreciation on home price is protected from capital gains tax (up to $500K for a family), unlike a brokerage account. The leverage gets lower as the equity increases (but then, one has built equity...) Another great thing to like about mortgage payment is that it does not increase with a fixed rate mortgage, so inflation will reduce the actual cost of mortgage payment , as you mentioned...
As long as your salary gets adjusted per year. Same store, same bagel from 3 months ago went from 2.99 to 3.99..........in NJ. Your PI is fixed but your cost of living is not.
Have you paid taxes lately? This housing bubble has absolutely caught the eye of local munucipalities and cause taxes to skyrocket. Plus, inflation causes maintenance costs are also rising beyond inflation.
I put 17% down and paid all closing costs in my first home. My actual taxes went up 13% the very next year.
Agree this is an important part that was overlooked in this video. Fair points below re. taxes also. My take away is that this is pretty complicated and case-by-case or market-by-market, and not easy to reduce to a simple rule
I was thinking the same thing about leverage. If you take leverage and avoiding capital gains taxes (if you were to sell) into account it significantly changes the calculation.
While property taxes and maintenance costs will increase over the years, so will inflation. I didn’t hear any mention of accounting for the expected increase in rent over the years in the comparison.
The non financial reasons for owning are what made me buy a property (currently in the closing stage). As long as I pay my mortgage, no one will be able to evict me and I can finally have a pet. Those 2 things alone are worth all the sacrifices I have made to save my deposit as a single buyer.
And I can finally live alone and not share a house because my mortgage on a 2bed is cheaper than renting a one bedroom apartment
Congratulations.
Enjoy your new house.
Great points!
I thought the same thing and everything changed when the job opportunities plummeted near me. Found myself driving 2 1/2 hours each way to my job and home, and just couldn't sustain that.
Eventually I realized my home wasn't ever going to be where the jobs would be. So, I sold my home and now I rent near where my job is, where I have no worries If I need to pick up and move again.
I immediately tuned out after you said downpayment of $100,000
And when you get old and retired, you are going to have your home, this is why US have a lot of homeless, one of the reasons, they cant pay the rent, your home is yours, just pay the mortage ASAP enjoy!
Definitely mislead a lot of viewers on this one(I assume unintentionally). That Leverage(mortgage) is the biggest benefit in real estate for most Americans. They aren't getting 1.97% on 100k down, they're getting that on the 500k value of the house. This allows real estate to not return nearly as high %, while still giving the homeowner a greater return on their money. Combine that with the ability to write off mortgage interest, and it makes it much more likely that buying is more profitable than renting.
So true. I don’t know why finance RUclips’s always miss this out 🙈
Interest deductions for mortgages are below the line, so many people would not get the opportunity to take advantage of it.
@@reecethomas1863 Yea but you also have to pay taxes on your market returns but not your house appreciation (most of the time). That more or less cancels out the lack of taking the interest write-off. But the biggest factor is the leverage, not getting that right is a major mistake and basically invalidates a large part of the analysis.
I was just about to bring up the exact same point. If you are getting a 2% return on the home valued at 500k and you only put 100k down. That means you get a return of 10% on the 100k you put down.
Hey! You missed a big one. Home mortgage interest and property taxes are deductible, reducing your tax liability. If you were to rent the home at the landlord’s cost (no profit), the renter gets to pay tax on every Penney of the payments. The buyer on the other hand has an income tax offset for all of the interest ( which declines under amortization) and the taxes (which increase over time at at least the growth rate of the home equity).
I always refer to home equity as retained inflation. Buy the house for $500,000 and at the end of 30 years it is worth $1,500,000… 3 times the purchase price. Now, if you remain in the same market, what can you buy with the $1.5 million?
You guessed it, the exact same house! Unless you move to a lower performing market which becomes a higher performing market, home equity is a fiction.
Where home equity comes in to play is when the buyer purchases the home and the market prices grow faster than the buyer’s purchasing power. This is often the case of seniors who purchased a large home to raise their family and find that in retirement there is no way they could afford to purchase the home they now live in.
Here in Phoenix, the average price to rent has gone up 64% in the last five years. My home equity has similarly risen (67%) while my monthly mortgage has stayed fixed. That expense for a 2,100 sqft home is 22% lower than the median cost to rent a 2-br apartment, and it will stay relatively fixed even as rental costs continue to soar. It’s safe to say I’m comfortable with my decision to own.
Totally different in the rust belt, property taxes are extremely high and homes barely appreciate over time.
I'd have about 400k more dollars if I chose to rent instead of buy if I just spent the money I put in a down payment into the S&P 500.
For someone not lucky to have been a homeowner in Phoenix prior to the inflation, it is cheaper for me to rent my 4/3 house than buy. (By about $1k a month)
@@ljr3061 I feel that. I’m glad we got in a few years before the madness. And refinanced right before the rate hikes.
I’m in a similar spot in Boston.. average rent nearby is about $3,000 and we locked in at $2,000 only 3 years ago
Great for you but you don't compare apple to apple here. No one knows the future. You look at the back mirror and found that yours was fine. But for someone who is exactly at the point of making the decision, they can't be certain about the future of theirs
You forgot about the leverage that the mortgage gives you. The 80% of the home that you DIDN'T pay for with your downpayment will also appreciate 2% each year. A quick/dirty way to deal with that is to lower your mortgage interest rate by 2% in your calculations for rent vs. mortgage.
Loved Ben's video 4 years ago. This is a great update.
A couple major points I don't think were touched on hard enough though:
1.) Closing costs, vary depending on location and sometimes you can get the seller to cover them but that is market dependent. 2-4%
2.) Home payments are going to stay roughly the same over time but rent also will increase with inflation. Not a great effect in the short term but a massive effect in the long term. This was touched on briefly but I worry most won't have picked up on this part.
Both of these aspects mitigate the cost of the home the longer you are there.
When calculating the opportunity cost you underestimated the property appreciation. You multiplied $100,000 x 2%. = $2,000. However the appreciation is for the entire property value, so it should be $500,000 x 2% = $10,000. This is a 5:1 leveraged investment. So, the actual return on the $100,000 investment is 10%.
@@Paulhfoley You could instead take that 2% and use it in the calculation to offset the cost of debt calculation. So in his example, the cost of debt would be 5% instead of 7%
Point 2 is the #1 reason I bought. Rent just kept going up. Now all I have to worry about is property tax going up.
@@pirate9154 Property taxes in Florida a limited to how much they can go up per year because of the "Save Our Homes" cap so I call BS on that but we are having an issue with home insurance skyrocketing. I find it very hard to believe that your friends are actually paying more than $8000 per year more than three years ago though unless they own multi-million dollar homes in very high risk areas.
Closing costs are one time costs and not ongoing. So they can be added to the down payment to figure out opportunity cost.
One thing worth thinking about is the product, vs just the cost of the product. In my neighborhood, 95%+ of homes are owner occupied. That means there is almost no rental availability. So if you want to rent vs buy, you might be looking at different neighborhoods and different quality of life. In other words, there are other variables to consider beside the cost of owning vs renting.
It is similar to the thought that home ownership is an important financial decision: but your home isn't just an investment vehicle.
You actually have to spend your life there. People chronically undervalue their time.
I am curious to see whether countries like Canada see an increase in brain drain again due to housing costs. Canada only has a few major economic centers so it is more difficult to "leave" the expensive markets. As such, those with portable skills will no doubt consider global options.
Is a good point, sometimes there are limited options in certain neighborhoods. Where I live most buildings by metro stations are rentals instead of condos.
That’s right, nutty, screwball neighbors living next store. Banging, and yelling all night! Rap music with a heavy bass booming at 2:00am. Every weekend, the cops arrive and you hear your neighbors getting arrested and screaming at the cops while getting tased. Then you start seeing hub caps missing off your car. Then a week later, you noticed your car got keyed all along the side of your car frame. You come home from work, your flat screen 20 inch tv is missing along with your speakers. Not only that, the thief was hungry and went into your refrigerator and made a sandwich and drank all your beer. You go into your bathroom, and you notice some asshole peed all over your toilet seat. Of course, owning a house in a nice neighborhood is the best choice. You get like-minded people like yourself, professional white collar workers who have to pay off a big nut every month but they feel it’s worth it living in a decent neighborhood away from the screwballs and the drugs.
Genuinely, it is the quality of life over the cost of income. A home is a quality of life investment, not an investment
@@nightowl5475 this is realistic comment. i love it
We really need to stop assuming the average buyer is putting 20% down. More realistic number is 3.5-10%
First time home buyers 8 percent, others 19 percent. Googleable information
What about the people who dont qualify? @@SBqwerty
@JOHN-um2grow up by increasing your opportunity cost?
@@waylorudd1128I’m pretty sure under 20% down you’re adding a mortgage insurance cost into your portfolio bro, and potentially a worse interest rate. There’s a reason ppl recommend at least 20% down. 🐖
Mine was 3 percent down as a first time homeowner.
The most important thing to consider is whether you plan on staying in that area or not for the next 7 years. Raise that number of years or lower it depending on the interest rate and base asset price. Opportunity cost can also hit you if you have an opportunity to earn double or triple the amount you make now, but you're anchored because of the mortgage.
Yep, and if you think of how insane USA politics have gotten this is a big factor.
I've watched a bunch of renting versus owning videos and read a bunch of articles on the topic and this is by far one of the best I've seen.
I want to point out the fact that when you purchase a home with a mortgage it becomes a leveraged asset. That 100k down payment/ investment on a 500k home would have a higher return then 2% its actualy closer to 10%. The reason is because the whole asset of 500k is appreciating at 2% not just the 100k.
I came here to say this exact thing. It changes the calculations dramatically.
It turns the cost of opportunity calculation completely on its head
@@Black70Fastback You also pay 45-50% of the home value in interest, so drop that baby down to 5% it doesn't look so good
@@hoihoi8interest is tax deductible on mortgages
He blew it on this one item. Rate of return on house value. Not rate of return on down payment.
I was stuck on deciding if to continue investing or start paying for a house. I ended up selling my positions and the home turned out to be a fixer upper more than I imagined. I don’t know how long I can keep this up for.
Oh my. A fixer upper is never a good decision for a first home. I have been a landlord and property investor/agent all my life. Please consider making a list of everything that needs to be done. Then list the priorities. Priority items are only those that are required to maintain the integrity of the structure. Like roofs, septic, HVAC; the expensive stuff you can’t show off to your friends. From there look at your wants and save for those items. If you can’t cash flow it don’t do it. One doesn’t need a Bosch dishwasher. It doesn’t work any different and has poor repair history yet people will pay triple what they need to. It’s an ego thing. I made the mistake early on of spending too much money on what really amounted to decorative items. Now I set a budget and don’t do something unless I have the cash. Take a breath and do nothing for six months. You’re just weary. You’ll be fine. The goal in the end is to have a paid for house so you can afford to retire. And stay off HGTV! 😂🥰
If you've made progress, re-list the property accounting for that and pick a project that you can handle. Sometimes 2 or 3 people try to rehab the same property.
@@foley2k2 you’re so spot on with fixer uppers. I worked heavily in the foreclosure market. Probably 30% of the listings we had were homes that were partially rehabbed. Sadly, 30-40% were from medical care. People couldn’t afford to pay for care along with their housing.
@@alexeytartinov It is already too late for that kinda suggestion don’t you think?
I was tempted to sell just like you having lost a lot, which is over 50% of my portfolio I am seeking more effective investment approaches to scale up with in these times as I have read of investors making gains in a bear market.
When I bought, this calculation would yield about $1,270. If I bought my home today, it would be $2,278. My market appreciated over time, so if your area is an area that appreciates over time, and you need a place to live, in my opinion, your best bet is to just buy and hold for a few years and let the market grow over time while you gain more equity. Great video!
What happened with me is I ended up going through a divorce at the worst possible time in the housing market. It made way more sense for me to buy a $60K mobile home than to rent a tiny apartment for around $2K per month
Simply seeing the listing for a 2 bed/2 bath house set at half a million dollars made me realize moving away from the west coast was probably the single smartest thing I've ever done in my life.
Now imagine even smaller flat for even more money, in a city that median household income after tax is only half of the US. That's what we got in HK:)
half million? hahaha try a million dollars.
That listing is a /mobile home/. It's not even a house! It's on a lot you need to pay rent for!
Half million? That's a bargain. In desirable cities, 2bd condos are $1million and up
There are pros and cons. I would want to live cheaper but in danger due to natural disasters each year that happen in the Mid West and East Coast. West coast, California, pays a weather tax since there are rarely no natural disasters that are catastrophic like elsewhere.
This is a good video and I actually made an in depth calculator for myself back in college. I would change a few things.
1. I would add insurance to cost of home you can divide it by 12 to get monthly cost your rent has this build in already.
2. HOA is becoming more and more common and these prices are not set, increasing a lot like, especially in condos, these also restrict your freedom on your house and could have fines.
3. Utilities there are some Utilities the owner has to pay no matter what, usually sewer/trash has to stay in owners name.
Utilities payments also need to be paid when you rent. Your landlord doesn’t cover utilities.
You also pay renter’s insurance.
I can only imagine being part of a generation where home ownership wasn't only for the exceedingly privileged or lucky. It sucks how many people have basically no choice but to rent until they die.
Basically, you are talking about the United States prior to 1945.
You could just move to an area in the US that you can afford to buy a home…
@@Fishfood007 Firstly, I don't live in the US. Housing prices are in a horrific state all over the world; the US isn't special on that front. Secondly, "just move" is such a grossly oversimplified solution it isn't worth considering. There are dozens of reasons for moving to not be an option for a lot of people.
Don't be dense for the sake of being dense. It's a bad look for anyone.
@@VirusVescichetta Might not be trying to be dense. If other things are more important to you than home ownership, great! Lots of people through world history have moved for COL/opportunity reasons, sometimes leaving family behind forever. It's worth at least considering.
Interest rates in the 80s were 20%! Most couldn't afford the loan.
As a life-long renter, I have always thought of my rent paying for my mobility. If the building where I live falls apart, or if the neighborhood takes a downward slide, I can simply pack my bags and leave. The worst that can happen is that I lose my security deposit. But if I owned a home in a neighborhood that started to decline in value because of crime or some other factor that would make it less attractive, I would need to find a new buyer to sell my house. And depending on the the cause of decline, that might not be so easy. I could be forced to sell my house for just enough to break even... or maybe even less than what I paid for it. And in an unstable economy such as what we presently have, home ownership may not be the most prudent investment.
You can also pack and leave if you owned a home. There isn't even a security deposit for you to lose.
@@markg-jw2hx ??? Abandoning your home is not a smart choice and potentially leads to greater losses than any kind of security deposit.
Think from the emotional side... Owning a house is a big accomplishment. It provides a sense of achievement in life, as well as a free space of your own, a sanctuary. Go for it if you can afford it. Worth it.
I recently sold my home and, at 80 years, have moved into a luxury high rise1 bed apartment in Raleigh. The 1650 monthly rent is $520 less than my mortgage was. My apartment is across the street from the main bus terminal, so I ride for free as a senior and I can get just about anywhere I need to go by bus. So I save another $400 in car expenses. Therefore, those savings make up more than half the cost of my rent. Being in a very nice apartment I have maintenance free if I need it and access to a swimming pool and a gym and a game room and a BBQ area. I look forward to a very nice years I however many I have left. And I am not alone. My son lives10 minutes away my buddy family is 20 minutes away and my volunteer family is15 minutes away. I look forward to some satisfying and pleasant years.
Enjoy! you did well
Bought an old house for cash last year and am renovating it, mostly myself. No mortgage and cash flowing the renovations. Half way done, going great. One of the best things I've done in a while.
I tried to do this until I realized that all my renovations took so much time and were hard to do solo. Now I’ve been hiring out these jobs here and there. IMO home ownership isn’t that great with my skill set (not handy)
Rent is becoming so high that my hous payment is the same if not less . Rent doesn’t make any sense right now
Another “cost” of owning a
house is the greatly reduced liquidity of your assets. It’s very hard to access the 500k value in your home when you need it in a hurry.
This is actually a benefit for a lot of people. If they had $500k lying around, odds are they'd spend it all on the latest crypto meme coin or buy a Porshe/Tesla model X.
@elitechampion Still a disadvantage, though.
The inflation and the biggest stock market crash are ahead. You don't want to put all your savings into one basket anyway. I'm an immigrant to the US so as a child I had a luck to witness the life situation where all reg folk's savings went to 0 instantly (and nobody ever got it back from the bank or the government). All that people are left with were properties and land. Even 10 years ago everyone would think it'll never happen in US. But now... it personally think there is a quite possibility. The situation is horrible.
You mean your 100k. Since that's all you're putting in. Renters will lose everything else they put in. The 400K will be locked in until you sell. But, you can always get a HELOC for 20% of the value of the house.
@@markg-jw2hx yet if the price of these 600k houses drop to 440k, these homeowners will lose much more than what renters put in. Or if insurance doesn't cover the roof, etc cetera
I rent a house all to myself for $1000/month and I'm happy in my current situation despite not having the most modern home in Grande Prairie, AB, Canada. I want to avoid lifestyle inflation and money status as you mentioned in your previous videos so I will not go into greater debt. Canada currently has a mortgage and debt problem where the country's GDP is lower than the nation's debt, due to housing debt as well as vehicle loans.
Cool story bro. But if you have a house you can use its equity a lot. For example in New Zealand you can get 1% pa loan on an electric car (and save a lot of money) using your house equity. You can install solar, improvements etc at discount. You can ask bank for a delay payment for up to 3 months (good luck trying the same trick when you renting). Also you can do maintenance of the house yourself (and save a lot), or postpone the fixes during hard years and do it when things go right. You can have pets in your house. Rent payments can grow (and they do a lot) whereas mortgage is fixed (if you fixed it). Heck, you can even rent out a room or two (or AirBnB) if you find yourself in a hardship.
Think about if you rented and invested the excess in a more sensible investment vehicle every month
I own now and I have rented before but I personally prefer renting, life seems to be more fun when you rent, it's usually in a better area and you get to have a gym,pool etc.. don't have to worry about maintenance and you have the freedom to pick up and go anytime you want, also owning means most or all of your money is in the house, if rent prices wouldn't go up and was like a mortgage fixed for many years I would 100% rent.
Thanks for your very informative video. I never realized how much money we saved in interest by physically building our own home. We paid has we went. We never had a mortgage. While building the house we lived in a school bus converted into an RV. We paid only $75/month for the RV slot. It was a lot of work but so worth it.
Good for you! My ex-husband and I did this as well. In 1989 we bought 5 1/2 acres and lived in a 27 foot travel trailer for four years while building. Unfortunately we divorced. It cost us 240k to build our home. 10 years later when I bought my husband out the house was appraised at $1.1 million. I was only able to hang on to it for a few years then had to sell. I’m now in my 60s and renting. Take good care of one another and cherish your marriage.💜💜
I've owned before but currently renting. One significant flaw with owning is that you really don't reap the ultimate benefit (my opinion) until you sell it. So, if it's your forever home, what good is the equity? I don't believe in borrowing against your property. Now, if you're planning on purchasing an investment property (not your primary resident), then this changes the landscape.
That's a weak argument. When you retire you can sell and either downsize or start renting. If you absolutely want to stay in the home there are ways to tap the equity in the house without needing to sell. What I've done is use the home equity for the down payment to buy a rental property. We live in a time where money is going to lose value every year so it will make real estate more valuable.
@martinlord8837 I didn't mention this to create an argument. I'm just simply stating an opinion. It's good for you though to bring this up so others can explore options. I would imagine that many elderly people aren't willing to move, relocate, rent, etc., (hince forever home) and surely aren't trying to jump into some real estate business deals.
You don’t have any benefit with renting either then.
You lock in the mortgage and eventually it’s paid off and you live out your years with very low monthly costs compared to the rental market.
@@arnoldmarcus3634 I am convinced that an IQ test needs to be required to breed and for home ownership.
Bought a home with my fiance almost 2 years ago. It has been a great experience. Those maintenance costs are real though. We spent north of 12k on improvements. But it's ours, and at 3% interest, our payment is MUCH better now compared to the rent rates in our area and we never have to worry about moving.
Keep her as a fiancé of u want to keep that house lol
A fixed-rate long-term mortgage payment is the ultimate form of "rent control."
@@binyam11 this is so unnecessary to comment
Congrats on your new home! Now work at getting the principal paid down.
@@binyam11 getting married in 2 weeks, that's the plan :D
Don’t forget, the entire home value appreciates, not just the down payment. So it’s much better than 2% after adjusting for that leverage.
Don't forget HOA (~200+ per month), Home Insurance (~40+ per month), and/or Land Lease (~1,000+ per month).
From Leo: Home ownership effectiveness also depends on the building repair skills and work ethic of the owner. An owner that replaces his own roof, services his own plumbing and HVAC and does his own painting and landscape maintenance is easily better off owning. If someone with no skills or motivation buys a home and has to hire contractors for all those things, the added maintenance costs lean heavily against home ownership. Just like a mechanic may drive all year and spend less than one car payment for an unskilled person.
The landlord is going to charge for roof repair at competitive rates, so it's a wash. As a renter, if you're skilled in repairs, you can negotiate with the landlord for a reduction in rent for any repairs the renter performs.
Property tax and home insurance has gone up dramatically (ie. Florida) in many areas. Like rent, you can't always predict those rate swings. But with renting, you can always get out after your lease ends.
Your rent pays for property tax and insurance. If property tax and home insurance goes up, so does your rent !!! There is no way you can escape it: renting or owning.
@@markg-jw2hx agreed in principle, however if you're renting, you can downgrade to save money if renting, most people don't and it's not easy, but it's a doable option if you're money minded like that.
and you can always be kicked out by your landlord
@@jth_printed_designs true, but there are a lot of friction costs to selling. renting, at most you're out your deposit
@@jth_printed_designs yes, very true, the bank will approve you for much more than a prudent budget will allow for. the bank is in the business of selling you dreams, and providing the finance for it.
Don’t care what anybody thinks. Owning will always trump renting a property. I dream of the day I can stop wasting my money renting and I can have a fixed mortgage payment for 30 years… A fixed mortgage is the most powerful weapon against inflation and the rising cost of living.
I’ve been in my current apartment for 3 years. My first year I only paid $1400 for a small 1 bedroom. Today I’m paying $1750 for the same unit…. To renew again my apartment wants to raise me to $2000 within a span of 4 years. Owning is a must at this point. Don’t even get me started on building equity for doing nothing but living in a home…
Another point to mention is that if you sell a house in less than 4 or 5 years, you take a huge loss because the loan origination costs, purchase taxes and other upfront costs don't get averaged out (amortized) over many years.
As well as sales commission if a realtor is used
What?
I bought a house in 2019 for $250K, worth $450K now four years later so your statement is not accurate.
@@CharlotteSoccerHighlightsthe original statement is generally true but you bought at one of the best times, values shot up, so, congratulations! Just keep this in mind in the future, prices will stabilize and if you buy during a flat or down market those costs may not be recouped easily.
The housing market is inflated and oversaturated with homes being on the market with astronomical price tags just stagnant for months. It is very clear that or generation will be likely one of the most devastating bubble pops in modern history. Seeking best possible ways to grow 250k into $1m+ and get a good house for retirement, I'm 48.
I don't think here is the place for personalized investment guidance. However, I suggest consulting with a reliable advisor like Azul to ensure appropriate retirement planning.
I’m closing in on retirement, and I have benefitted much from using a financial advisor. I didn’t really start early, so I knew the compound interest of index fund investing would not work for me. Funny how I pulled in over 80% profit than some of my peers who have been investing for many years. Maybe you should consider this too
I've been considering getting one, but haven't been proactive about it. Can you recommend your advisor? I could really use some assistance.
'Kristin Amber Landis' is the licensed advisor I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment.
Thanks for sharing. I curiously searched for her full name and her website popped up immediately. I looked through her credentials and did my due diligence before contacting her.
What happened to SVB is really scary, and goes to show that no corporation, however big, is immune to collapse. I have always had a deep-seated mistrust for corporations. I have plans to pull out most of my money, but don't know what to do with $350k sitting idly. I'd like to go into the stock market, maybe. Any ideas?
All big corps are just a cohort of centralised system working together, and any damage to one can have a dangerous ripple effect on every other one. I learned a long time ago to not trust corporations. Most of my money is in the stock market and my businesses. I keep only what I need to spend in my checking account.
@@Erinmills98 Ironically, these are the conditions in which life-changing money is made by those who remain calm, patient, and take controlled risks. Volatility goes both ways. The banks are in a big crisis. The market looks very shaky. The bigger the red candles, the bigger the green ones. I have made over $280k in the last 4 months by investing through my FA.
@@simonbad Wow. I've heard similar success story from people who work with advisors. How do I get in touch with yours, please?
@@IrenaDolinsek Oh, I'm not really in the business of giving financial advisor, so you are responsible for your decisions. But I have been working with Kathleen Yanelli Carole, so you could check her out and contact her, if you want.
@@simonbad I appreciate so much mate! I will look up her page..
In the long run is mostly always to own home. In the initial years when interest payments are high, rental costs may be higher, but after a few years, the cost of owning will likely be lower as your loan amortizes and interest payment reduces. Also, you are shielded from inflation ‘cost’ particularly for fixed rate mortgage. By year 30, you are paying very little in interest. However, rental costs will escalate almost annually at least by inflation rate, which will make rental cost in 30 years much higher.
I agree, if you’re going to stay in one place for 30+ years it’s almost always better to purchase a home. That being said the cost of equity associated home ownership also increases with inflation since as your home’s value increases, so does the opportunity cost of home ownership
@@HQSCJIPZeven if you move around every few years it's still usually better to buy
You need to consider the fact that your rent will increase!! How are you going to find a place that won’t increase your rent in 30 years? The problem is people keep refinancing their loans. The very best is a 15 year loan, because the interest is lower. The ban k did offer me a 40 year loan....I only have 13 years left on my mortgage! A 40 year loan is real. The sad truth is most people never pay off their homes, and that is the REAL problem. Home ownership is the biggest difference in the haves vs. the have nots. When I first moved into my place, the place I was renting was $1,000/month, now those apartments are 2,500/month. So with buying I have a bigger place and I pay $1000 less than what I would be paying in rent.
Not with house prices today (at least in South FL)
Just bought my first house. Loving it so far, but deffo see the benefits of just renting.
thanks Olley - what do you like about owning though? Lmk
Lol
@@humphrey 1) Intangible happiness and satisfaction of owning/being fully responsible where you live. 2) Greater freedom in planning and designing updates/renovations/etc. 3) You're going to be paying to live somewhere anyway, so you might as well keep in equity some of the money you spend. If you can afford it or it's feasible of course. You're still paying property taxes, updates, utilities, etc in your rent, it's just hidden and not your direct responsibility.
I love home ownership too! But when people ask me about it I make sure they're aware it's really not for everyone.
@@kiaracodes5166 deffo!
Sorry Humphrey, Even if Median home price apreciation is 2%. By using a mortgage you are leveraging the return 5x. Meaning your return on investment is 10% not 2%. This changes everything.
Canada also offers first time home buyer program where you need only a 5% downpayment. Effectively giving you 40% ROI. Not to mention there are ways to buy a house without a downpayment like having a parent or friend co-sign.
In my province, the maximum duration of a mortgage is 25 years; and it can only be fixed for five years.
You need to regenociate your rate every five years.
In your example, the 2% home price appreciation would be based on $500,000 or $10,000 a year. Also, you can refi when rates go down. Based on my experience, rent goes up every year, especially with Wall St. owning more SFHs. Just some other things to consider.
not for my friend who has rented same apartment for 20 years and they only raised his rent a tiny amount. He was paying 500 now paying 1k a month compared to new tenants paying 1500/month downtown Sacramento, CA area.
@@GuitarsAndSynths That's great. And your friend is stuck as a renter for the rest of his/her life? Perfect for property owners.
This. Great video but fails to take into account the rate at which avg Rent rises per year
homeownership also has some tax benefits. But then also a lot of sunken costs
@@andyyoo2948 I think that is a great point. However, each individual's situation varies greatly. You could have a landlord that owns only one or two properties or a company who owns thousands. The individual owner may value occupancy over greater profit margins like the company because they want to decrease their risk. This could mean lower increases over time for a renter like the commenter above.
To your point, it may be beneficial to include an average rent increase so the average consumer benefits from being more aware. But I do think he roundaboutly addresses this by noting the fixed price benefit of a mortgage vs. the surprise/unknown timing of a rent increase.
How about including Home Insurance into the expenses?
Very true. Good point.
I thought that was figured into the monthly payment. It’s put in escrow along with property taxes.
@@rinzor Good point. If you own your own home (without the bank) then you have to add it in.
@@rinzor correct. It is to be assumed that the mortgage payment has that in it already
Should have tenant /renters insurance too, both should be included. Also condo fees should be included if applicable (add it to maintenance expense).
Your explanation is realistic and straight to the point. l watch several video's on how to trade in the market but haven't made any headstart because they are either taIking some gibberish or sharing their story of how they made it. And l don't want to make mistakes by taking risks on my own
You buy a home for rent control. Staying in a house for 20yrs is a HUGE benefit when keeping the original mortgage cost.
People get into trouble with homes like with cars... they always want to upgrade and constantly owe banks money instead of owning those assets themselves.
Yep, I bought my house 10 years ago. Looking at rental prices today, I would be paying DOUBLE my mortgage that I locked in 10 years ago if I had rented to live in a house like this. With rent your cost of renting goes up every year with inflation.
Love the video @humphrey as a CFP I do this exercise with clients all the time. Just one thing to remember when looking at the opportunity cost for the downpayment you can't use the historical average of the S&P 500 as it is an index of 500 stocks. The vast majority of ppl would never qualify under KYC rules in a portfolio or ETF of 100% stocks, they don't have the risk profile to do so. Most are a moderate/balanced investor which would be a 60/40 or a 70/30 split between stocks and bonds. That therefore would yield a lower historical average return than 100% stocks. Even Warren Buffett averages a 90/10 split. Otherwise great video!
Love the video and a great starting point rule. I did choose to buy even though more expensive because of forced savings and knowing mortgage payment does not change, both of which you mention.
What most people don't calculate in this equation is that you basically live rent free once you payed your mortgage. If you buy a house around 30, and pay a mortgage for 30 years that means you can live rent free during your retirement, which is worth A LOT, when you ask me.
Hey, great video! But there is a key missing component from the opportunity cost: houses are leveraged assets!
A 2% return on home price with 20% down is equivalent to a 10% return in the stock market, because you have 5x leverage. And its equivalent to a 57% return on the 3.5% minimum down for FHA loans (100/3.5 = 28.5x leverage).
That leverage changes over time as you gain more equity, but early on its relatively flat because of the amortization schedule.
True, you’d almost have to compare to stocks bought on margin to capture the true effect
I imagine the 7% comparison in the video is just putting your down payment in a managed broker, or an index fund tracking S&P500, with no leverage. As soon as you make the comparison against a more involved trading situation, it's no longer a heuristic.
Thats a 2% positive return on 400K changing figures 8K/year in favor of home purchase:) 2% yearly home appreciation being Very conservative......
Looking around it seems like historical average annual real estate returns are anywhere between 1% and 6%, but the last couple of years have had on the order of 20% spikes, so expecting more significant increases in the near future seems unwise. Not to mention, we are approaching new records and thresholds in housing affordability and availability, along with new-ish wide-scale real estate investment situations (record corporate ownership). As paired with every piece of economic advice: past results do not guarantee future results.
I was going to post this same comment. Thanks for noting this issue with the way cost of capital was calculated in the video.
I realized this many years ago, my rent was basically lower than my loan interest on a typical property that I wanted this didn't include the cost of maintenance and taxes, I put that saving plus my normal savings aside, I admit that it wasn't my intention but I ended up with no loan home, my income increased over time and my partner helped as well.
The opportunity cost needs to be adjusted to only reflect the difference between the returns of the property versus what you were expecting from another opportunity. You also have to realise that your deposit is considered leverage to give you access to earn returns on money that isn’t even yours
8:43 that much interest adds to ability to do itemized tax deduction. So there is a tax benefit that renting does not provide.
I think something people don’t often think about when thinking about buying a home instead of renting is the difference in cost of electricity. Air conditioning a 1800sqft home is significantly higher than a 900sqft apartment and should be considered as well. Especially if you don’t have shade on your home or if your home is facing west where the sun is going to set everyday
you can buy a 900sqft condo🤷♂️
@@Zach_CR a condo is not a house :)
You’re comparing apples to oranges though. To get an accurate assessment on the rent vs. buy situation, you should be comparing equally sized homes. Otherwise, the comparison can be highly skewed. For example, if taken to the extreme, you could say buying is never worth it because a mansion’s property taxes and utilities alone is more than it costs to rent a one bedroom apartment.
@@alecgalbraith5604 In my state, usually when people go from an apartment to a home, they are not going to buy a home that is the same sqft as their apartment. I can’t speak to how it is in other states. 900sqft homes don’t really exist here.
@@MadisonFalcoFoods Good observation, neither is an apartment. Point is, a 900sqft apartment is comparable to a 900sqft condo in terms of electricity in the context of your original comment
There is a very key error here at around 4:40. The real estate return home price return is 2%, but the stock market return is 7%. But you have to multiply the down payment by the leverage. So if you have a $100,000 down payment on a 500,000 home, what is growing at 2%? The home price! Not the down payment. So .02 * 500k is 10,000. That means your investment went from 100,000 to 110,000, or 10%. So the true return on a home is 10%, not 2%. This matters a great deal.
this is absolutely true. however, if you want to keep an apples to apples comparison then the renter needs to be given a $400,000 investment loan to match what the owner gets. This obviously seems very unlikely in reality. The real argument here is that a mortgage makes available HUGE leverage, that a renter otherwise wouldn't have access to.
@@iownahahaNot only that, but you also need to factor risk into the equation. There is significantly less risk in the S&P500 then there is in a piece of real estate that is leveraged 5x. Risk adjusted rate of return is what should be compared.
While warning 2%, you're losing money on interest, taxes, possible PMI, plus costs of upkeep. You end up losing money.
Not sure if this has been mentioned, but as far as the opportunity cost of sinking 100k into the s&p at 7% compunded over that 30 year mortgage =761k. Not to mention the "opportunity cost" of being limited on mobility i.e. better opportunities elsewhere or shopping for cheaper rents in changing needs. Moving closer to job opportunities. Freedom to relocate to lower cost areas or higher pay jobs etc. Just food for thought. I would assume a good portion of buyers wouldn't stay in the same house for 30 years to take advantage of the amortization interest curve, or be roped into a refinance after
I feel like one thing people aren’t talking about is all the repairs to keeping your home up to value and the amount of money you have to put in especially if you plan on moving out. For example, you need to buy a new roof that’s 20k you no longer have and since you don’t plan on selling the roof that isnt going to be an asset you cab liquidate
I bought an older home (1956). The previous owner tried to do everything themselves so lots of things are held together with gum. We’re spending about $500-1,000 a month fixing things. On the long run it’ll pay off but in the short, owning is DEFINITELY not cheaper than renting. Don’t go in thinking that or you will lose your shirt.
Do they just break on their own? Maybe it is because you are overusing your home appliances? Showering and watering too long, leaving electricity on when not needed, flushing the toilet too much. Maybe opt for a grass-free garden, change your landscape to natural native plants that are drought resistant. Live a minimalist lifestyle. Why do you incur high costs with fixing things?
@@jacqueslee2592 Well when you don’t maintain things or repair them properly for years it adds up to a lot.
@@bryan_witha_whyy Well, I rather buy nothing for this reason. I still do not understand how things just break down. Maintenance and having things are a headache because they become part of your life. Hence, why I always hear my damn neighbors everyday just working on their homes. The noise of machinery for me is sickening when I was in the US. Do you live in a high maintenance home? I try to avoid those when I will buy a home. In Japan, homes do not break down but we also live minimally and smaller homes.
@@jacqueslee2592 Things break, mechanicals need parts. A house takes a beating. It takes work and money to keep it up. That’s why I think most people should just rent.
Bought our home for $310k in KS in early 2019...it is now worth close to $500k and our rate is 2.375%. If we had decided to wait buy a house today, our payment would have went from $1550 on a 15-year note to about $2900ish house payment on a 30-year fixed. 🤯
That 30-year fixed is no different from robbery to me...
Renting if you don’t want to deal with maintenance. I prefer buying. I love owning a house. I spent a good a amount of money maintaining my house.
thats great to hear
Irresponsibility is that. The landlord will deal with the maintenance, and charge you for it.😊
"maintenance" of lowest quality appliances, lowest quality materials.
If you take into account the space (in square feet) then renting looks way less attractive.
Sure, you could pay $2000 in rent… for a basement or half a basement (if you live in Canada). And no garage. Just a spot on the street. And if you rent half a basement, guess what? You get a random person as a roommate. Whether you want them or not.
Whereas the $400,000 home could include 3 stories and a garage and that’s all yours.
I'm glad you mentioned the amortization curve. In theory you could take your total interest payment and the total investment in the house and run a weighted average cost of capital calculation. I think an even better way (something I'm working on) is to spreadsheet out and simulate the year-by-year cash flows, including taxes, and providing a year-over-year picture of what your portfolio would look like along with your net worth.
If you know how to fix or enjoy working on carpentry, plumbing, electric, HVAC, buy. If you don’t know how to do any of those things, rent. I’ve been a home owner for only 2 years now and absolutely hate it. I miss the worry free life of paying rent and if something went wrong calling the landlord and it being there probably. I would trade my equity for peace of mind. Owning a home is overrated and stupid. I'm going to sell and go back to renting.
Plus, you can just move for a cool new job or living experience when you want - if you are a renter.
That spreadsheet is super nice to tinker with. Considering I'm someone who is still at the stage of their life where renting is all that really makes sense, this video is more of a helpful tool when it comes to road mapping my future plans rather than any current decisions I'm making, but it's super important nonetheless! Great video Humphrey!
4:43 you are missing the leverage in the calculations that you get with the mortgage loan. If the property appreciates by 2%, you make money on the value of the home not just on the down payment. So 2% will be $10,000 compared to 7% on S&P 500 with 100k investment.
As he says, simplicity and flexibility are big non-financial reasons to rent. Another in my experience is the cost in time to maintain a home. Before I boight my first house Saturdays were family fun days. Afterward they were work around and on the house days. This was no small loss (and continues 30 years later). Im glad we bought the houses we did from a financial standpoint but am less happy with the loss of time and family togetherness.
Soon I hope to go back to renting and live a simpler, more stress-free life.
This video is balanced and almost exactly independently verifies what I calculated for my parents that are needing to downsize their large house to extend their retirement nest egg.
The fact that Ben Felix is one of your sources is another huge witness to this objective video.
Well done and methodical
Great content. I also first heard of this concept from Ben Felix and I have been wanting him to put out an updated version to reflect current realities (I also live in Canada). Thanks for adding to the conversation.
Side note, it's funny how many times I've tried to explain this concept to friends or relatives whenever people ask me when I'm planning on buying a house. I'd say 99% of the time it's met with a blank stare and I get told I'm crazy for thinking renting is better than buying in my case because it's "dead money". I'll usually explain the math and the concept another time and again get met with resistance. The takeaway is in Canada (likely most places in the world) the idea that buying a home is better 100% of the time is so ingrained in our minds it is hard for people to seriously consider this idea objectively.
FWIW I live in a very luxury market and rent my place for $900 all costs accounted for. If I were to buy in this area my monthly costs according to your percentage rule would be around $3000 a month.
Cheers.
Agreed. I owned houses in the past and now rent. I live in Ontario in a very expensive area. Much cheaper to rent.
What got me when I was younger was value vs cost. When viewed per square foot, or per features homes are generally waaaay cheaper compared to renting an apartment. And that over time a larger portion goes towards principal, making a house a super inefficient savings acct vs "burning money" by renting. It was enough to force me into buying far sooner than I should have. Waiting another 2-3 years would have put me in a better spot overall because of everything stated in this video.
Plus the issue of uncounted costs. If you are renting, you aren't going to dump money into improvements or customizations, or maintaining everything to as high of standards. And because rentals are typically smaller, there is less to maintain in the first place. This becomes a huge sink that home owners don't typically admit to.
This rule of thumb is good for a short time horizon of under 3 years. After that there are too many changing variables for it to remain helpful. The biggest factor in the rent vs. buy decision in the medium-term is the rate of home appreciation.
I would generally not recommend putting 20% down unless you have really bad credit. We were able to put 5% down, saving us $45,000 on a downpayment and our PMI is $50/month (This was in 2021 so frankly a lot has changed). If localized appreciation is high in your area, your mortgage is leverage on your return of ownership. Our home has appreciated ~ $40,000 in 2 years, which is already double the amount of our down payment + closing costs.
And I was able to leave the remaining $45K in the market so I managed to lose a lot of money on that ;)
Last sentence got me. 😂
Me too friend, me too.
@trenthorton9, Your home HAS NOT appreciated $40,000 in two years.
100% Fact your home DEPRECIATES 3.636% every year. The IRS even says it does. Google it!
10:07 A home never ever goes up in value.
For a home to go up in value, you MUST spend over 4% in maintenance and repairs every year.
If a home just goes up in value, there would never be any reason ever to replace or fix anything in your home! Ever! Right?
100% Fact! Everything in your home will eventually need replaced! This makes owning a home a bad investment compared to renting.
He failed to mention the evil Hoa fees, but that is typical, even experts don't calculate this cost. If you buy a crappy apartment "conversion" in Los Angeles, with paper thin walls and $500 per month HoA fees, that will mean you need to add $120k to whatever you hope to sell it for in order for you to make profit. So if you bought it for $550, sell it for $750, you actually only made $80k
You forgot homeowner association fees, and utilities.
I think for maintenance costs you should save 1% for every decade & 500k of the house. So if your home is worth 500k and is 10 years old, save 1% every year. If your house is 750k and is 15 years old, save 1.5% (1% for first 500k and 10 years + 0.5% for next 5 years and remaining 250k)
Technically your primary residence is not an investment, it is a liability, as it takes money out of your pocket, not into it. A better comparison would be a rental property vs the stock market. Make sure to factor in the tax benefits of a rental property and how that can offset W2 income
You still acquire equity in your primary residence. You don't see it but it is there.
And you're technically wrong. A primary residence is an Asset because it provides a useful function. The paid mortgage principal goes into Equity because you now own that part outright, the paid mortgage interest and other fees that you'll never get the money back out of are Liabilities.
Just because something has recurring expenses or costs more to maintain than it's worth over the course of a lifetime doesn't turn an asset into a liability in terms of accounting / finance, because if it still has use it's an asset with offsets of liabilities and equity.
Now, depending on tax breaks, etc, it may be better strategy to have a rental property due to other benefits like you said, but you're simply wrong about the liability part. Might as well recommend depreciating land next and see where that gets you
@@hamartian_7979 those are valid points, but the main premise of my statement was more around the framework of comparing assets that actually give you a positive ROI, like what paper financial assets i.e. dividend stocks, bonds, etc provide vs a rental property etc. While I agree there is some equity you build, your primary residence does not provide a NET positive ROI on a monthly basis, so in reality it is a technically a liability. As such, the comparison between a primary residence and index and paper equities is flawed. If you are not getting positive cash flow on a monthly basis, it’s a liability. That is universal, it doesn’t matter what it is, regardless of the function you get out of it.
It's like saying a car isn't an investment but a liability. How are you get to work then? Walk? If you have a car, suddenly a lot of money making opportunities open up compared to walking. So, then it becomes an investment. Similarly, you have to spend money for housing. The choices are rent or buy. Comparing to rent, a house is an investment.
@@markg-jw2hx spoken from a car guy with multiple cars, cars are liabilities 99% of the time. Unless you are really savvy and know what cars will be sought after and in short supply in the future, and can actually sell at a profit ( including deducting maintenance from your profit). Function does not make something an asset, Cash flow does. That is my main point. You guys are focusing on the leaves and missing the forest
Imagine a world where buying a home wasn’t so goddam expensive
The mythical time of 2012-2020. Before Covid and the world went crazy.
2009-2010. Prices were 1/3 to 1/6 what they are now.
Its 7% on 100k and 2% on 500k , so leavrage is magic.... You actually accumulate 3% more on your real estate.
Maintenance costs (unless you have a brand new home) are drastically underestimated for current cost of labor and materials. Even if you assume no accidents, just assume best lifespan of appliances and materials on a home: New roof every 15-20 years? 30K. New HVAC every 10-15 years? 14k, flooring, siding, etc.. they all have lifespans under 30 years so expect to replace them in the lifetime of your mortgage. Don't forget landscaping either, most rentals don't expect you to landscape as the renter.
Another note: Although mortgage can be more stable, don't plan on it staying the same. My home insurance (in California) went from $900/year in 2020 to $6,000/year in 2024.
If I were a landlord renting out homes I'd definitely include property tax, home owners insurance & extra maintenance fees in the rent; the renters will cover those cost. I don't get why people don't get that.
Also, I think you can rent a place for less than what you would pay for mortgage for that specific place you want to live in etc… but of course both have pros and cons:)
Not in my area.
Not even😂 my mortgage is cheaper then rent and in 30 years I will have property and not paid for some rich assholes mortgage
I’m also including the fact that I own more of my house every month. I locked in my mortgage below 3%, so I can never move.
But thank you for making this video!
Your spreadsheet should add the average rent increases per year. Time the person plans to live there, say 5,10, 15 etc…then the total cost rent vs buy after you sell your home after some time.
I think he forgot to calculate the opportunity cost for principle payments as part of the mortgage. This drastically changes the math.
A nice updated video! Though there's a few assumptions that kindof tip the balance in favor of renting, you covered the straight line interest effect, but another big one is:
You didn't account for capital gains taxes. When shares are sold you'll be taxed on the increase in value, and on any dividends paid, where a house you live in will be sold without any capital gains. That 7% gain on market is much closer to 4-5% after taxes.
Nice video - you forgot though that the financed portion of the home appreciates, too (not only the portion your downpayment paid for). So even with mortgage rates at 7%, you should calculate 5% (7% mortgage rate - 2% appreciation).
Yes, definitely need to include that. I was trying to find the most logical place to put it, and I think there is good
So you'd actually get 7.11% rule
2% per year for maintenance seems very high based on my experience of owning an older home. I've had plenty of issues I've had to work on but definitely not that much.
It also implies that houses only ever break even because your 2% return on investment per year matches your 2% cost of maintenance ownership.
It depends on where you live, and if you do the work yourself or hire out. I know from both experiences in my area 2% is modest.
It's average over time and with fixer uppers included. Roof goes out, foundation bad, siding replacement, electric reinstall, etc. That'll all go well over 2%.
I feel like the majority of folks are overlooking the fact that employment pay is not increasing with these inflated home prices. We are at that point where everyone thinks they have these “high value” homes and it’s literally fake value numbers. This delusion that is going on will eventually implode and it’s gonna be ugly.
Rent for now, pay off debt, live light and be patient. The “Jone’s” are gonna be called the “Brokies” soon enough!
I am renting a house in Arizona for $2400 per month. If I bought the same house and did $100,000 down my monthly payment would be $3800 per month plus all the taxes and maintenance costs.
I'm in the same exact situation here in Florida. It makes absolutely no sense to buy yet thousands of 400k+ homes are selling out monthly in my state.
Good starting point. Items to consider to improve true costs: You left out the cost of home owner's insurance. Closing costs should be amortized over the life of home ownership. It wasn't clear if the price appreciation was after inflation, which doesn't seem likely. You can actually lose money on home ownership. I basically broke even on 4 properties owned over 30 years. The real ownership plus for me was I was able to modify home to meet my needs as family needs changed.
If you rented you wouldn’t have broke even.
How did you only break even on homes you owned for 30 years?
@@joenunez938 my property I bought for 200k is now worth 900k in 23 years. Not sure how breaking even works over 30 years. I guess it’s the new math being taught? 🥹🤓
The 8.71% excludes that the entire home appreciates 2% annually, not just the 20% down payment. The 8.71% is really closer to 6%
Being Canadian for me I knew it would be more expensive to buy then to rent but I also knew that as I pay down my mortgage, rents keep increasing
Now 20 yrs later my monthly expenses reduced by half while rents more than doubled
It’s all a matter of your own personal point of view & what you’re comfortable with :)
Also, if you sell your principal residence for more than you bought it the difference is yours tax free, vs. putting that $ in the stock market will be fully taxable depending how it’s placed of course
owning home also has additional costs like decor, furnishing, appliances which aren't worth much when you sell it. We tend to buy extra things when we own. Also, as you pay down the mortgage, the cost of your capital stays about the same (S&P gain vs interest). Another thing, when we rent, we don't rent the same sized house as we buy. We rent smaller units. So renting is much less costly than the video presented.
As a home owner, this calculation is very useful. One thing to consider as well is that while renting, most likely, you won't have many utilities to pay. When you own the property, you have to pay for everything. That also varies depending on whether you own a condo or a house.
One thing that’s not considered is that the locale in which your fixed investment/home can change drastically. Neighborhood preferences can shift very quickly. Once pristine neighborhoods can become “blighted” and unsafe for a retired elderly person to live in. The blighted value of the property diminishes greatly and becomes a difficult item to market.
Solid informative video. Did you include the appreciation on the whole $500k value of the property and not just on the $100k down payment? 2% of the remaining $400k would bring an additional return of $8k. So the number would be $35.5k and not $43.5. This would make it 7.1% and not 8.71%. That would be $2,367 instead of $2,903. I may not have fully grasped the concept, but it did seem to leave out the appreciation of the entire home value.
I noticed this point also and agree with your modified analysis.
All these videos and articles almost always miss tax savings which is much higher in ownership. You missed tax savings which is mostly mortgage interest is 100% deductible.
I love that Humphrey addresses the emotional component of the avg individual.
A few things that finance ppl don’t address are: ability to renew lease is in most part dependent landlords renewing. Even if you are a wonderful tenant, your landlord may still need to sell and unable to renew your lease. Time/emotional/financial cost of looking for rentals, financial/time cost of moving every 2-3 years.
If you have kids, a dog and a bunch of belongings, renting is too unstable. Landlords are an unpredictable risk factor