How You Should Think About Infinite Cartesian Products

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 фев 2025
  • I regularly teach a topology class online, and often it's the first time my students encounter infinite Cartesian products of sets. This video aims to help you understand what elements of such products look like.
    Thank you for supporting my channel!

Комментарии • 17

  • @NaderHGhanbari
    @NaderHGhanbari 2 месяца назад +4

    Amazing visualization. When I first studied topology, I thought of R^w (or R^N) as the set of all real-valued sequences and R^w1 (or R^R) as the set of all real-valued functions. Later I learned about how this concept is called an Exponential in a Cartesian Category. Studying category theory really helped me go back and re-learn abstract algebra, topology, etc. through a new lens.

    • @DrMcCrady
      @DrMcCrady  2 месяца назад +2

      Thank you for your comment!

  • @wargreymon2024
    @wargreymon2024 Месяц назад

    very good demonstration 👍🏻 really looking forward to more videos from you.

  • @dev-ii9bd
    @dev-ii9bd 2 месяца назад

    Wonderful. Thanks

    • @DrMcCrady
      @DrMcCrady  2 месяца назад

      Thank you for your comment!

  • @thomasjefferson6225
    @thomasjefferson6225 2 месяца назад +2

    Pretty good video. i never thought of it like this before

  • @gileadedetogni9054
    @gileadedetogni9054 3 месяца назад

    I should have seen this video when I started studying topology on infinite cartesian products, it would have made much more sense to me. Great video, as always :)

    • @DrMcCrady
      @DrMcCrady  3 месяца назад +1

      Thank you for the compliment!

  • @tom-e1w
    @tom-e1w 2 месяца назад

    I just finished learning about co-vectors which are the set of linear functions from R^n and has size R^n. I wonder what the size of other restricted sets of functions like polynomial functions or continuous functions ect.

    • @DrMcCrady
      @DrMcCrady  2 месяца назад

      Hi Tom, that’s such cool stuff! Each of those sets has the same cardinality as R.

  • @bartolobenlordd.9299
    @bartolobenlordd.9299 2 месяца назад

    I wonder how do you animate these things?

  • @ariuwu1234
    @ariuwu1234 Месяц назад

    aren’t you assuming CH here? or am i misinterpreting the notation

    • @DrMcCrady
      @DrMcCrady  Месяц назад

      I don’t think so. CH says that the cardinality of omega_1 equals the cardinality of the reals. I believe I said the cardinality of omega_1 is at most the cardinality of the reals, but I did not say they’re equal.

    • @ariuwu1234
      @ariuwu1234 Месяц назад

      @ right, thanks!