Allah Made It Appear That Jesus (as) Was Crucified || Allah Took His Soul Away || Seikh Imran Hosein
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 июл 2024
- Did they manage to kill Nabi Isa (as) on the cross? How did Allah make it appear that he was crucified? Let's find it in this lecture.
🔄Watch🔄Subscribe🔄Like🔄Comment🔄Share🔄
💥💥💥💥FULL LECTURE : • 2012: Jesus and The En...
✅This video is produced and created by Islamic Eschatology for its two associated productions :
“Islamic Eschatology English”
Original Speaker : Sheikh Imran N. Hosein
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
📢📢Our lovely brothers and sisters, Assalamualaikum. We would like to bring this to your attention that we do very hard work in order to creating a conent in such a way so that we can easily understand and receive the message what our respected speaker wants to say. Sometimes some visual guidance helps us to understand message quickly and easily. From that point of view, this is our small effort to create videos of Seikh Imran N. Hosein’s lectures. We do have his consent to use his lectures and his vocal files.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
💎BUY US A COFFEE💎
We are still growing and we need your support for our consistent work. Without your support, it will be difficult to maintain the team and hard work.
Onetime or Monthly/Yearly : www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted...
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
✅We are also available in :
Facebook: / islamiceschatologyenglish
X (formerly Tweeter): / islamescatology
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
✅To download Free PDF books of Seikh Imran N. Hosein or Purchase,
visit our Website: islamiceschatology.de/
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
✅Don’t hesitate to contact us :
📧 islamiceschatologyenglish@gmail.com
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
ℹ VERY IMPORTANT ℹ
We display our website address on our videos with an intention of collecting PDF books by downloading them FREE from our website. This is a pure intention of promoting the purpose of free learning and education. Anyone can visit and downaload the free PDF books from our website.
Our original contents are minimum 60 minuites and maximum 120 minutes in length. You should find all of our original contents in the playlist named "All The Full Length Lectures". Therefore, it’s so tiresome and hardwork to create such a big content to create. We don’t use any random video clips but relevant to the original speech. To do that, we need a vast amount clips from different subjects. This is why we use www.canva.com/ (Pro version). The clips are not our own but as we have purchased the subscription, we can use their massive resource of materials in order to creating our long videos.
I think it needs to repeat one more time that we just simply don’t use any random video clips but relatable footages that are relevant to the main audio clip's specific moment and time in order to create a meaningful harmoney between audio and video clips. Doing such for minimum 60 minites video itself is a very hard work. Each long video requires almost 120 hours to be prepared and finally get it ready to be delivered.
First, we collect the vocal track of the main speaker (officially) and go through the track to remove any unwanted sound or noise. Then we create the video file in Canva.com using relevant clips to the speech. Each of the clips is combined and overlayed with multiple video clips and images. Also, we put some graphical figures related to subject on the each footage. Then we translate and transcript the lecture to create the subtittle. Adding the subtittle for such large file is another long journey in creation of our original content. After that, we add effects using different video editing softwares in order to create such a content which is unique and never been uploaded on social media before. Therefore, our video is unique, not repeatative, and solely our OWN PRODUCTION.
Background Music and Copyright:
As this is our own production created by “Islamic Eschatology”, we have created and purchased our own music track. The music that is heard along with the speech is EXCLUSIVELY made for us. Threfore, we don’t give permission to use any of our videos or video clips or audio clips anywhere without our consent.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
✅For more details, visit our website: islamiceschatology.de/
Disclaimer:
Our respected speaker always says in his lectures that "When I offer an opinion, you MUST never accept it. Unless or until you are convinced that what I am saying is correct". This bold statement alone is more than sufficient to explain that our own research and study are always required. Similarly, "Islamic Eschatology" also believs in the same philosophy. Any of the interpretations, comments, or views expressed by our respected speaker may not necessarily represent the beleif of "Islamic Eschatology" and its associate productions such as "Islamic Eschatology English" and "Islamic Eschatology Bangla".
Threfore, "Islamic Eschatology" and its affiliates do not advocate nor condone any unlawful activities towards any individual or community.
#islam #jesus #quran
HOW COME WE DO NOT HEAR YOUR VOICE TOWARD THE GENOCIDE IN GAZA.
We would hear it , if there was Christians being slaughtered, he always take Christians side
This pompous hypocrite hates Gaza and Palestinians just as he hates the ottoman empire. That's why he never talks about Palestinians, Allah disgrace him
And never in no clue of doubt We have ordained to let Our prophets and messengers to witness and experience the evil and severe pubishment orderen by the hands of the evil and corrupt ones
The important thing is that all scholars agreed with the Quran that he wasn't killed nor crucified. How it happened is irrelevant here.
Syeikh.... the keyword is there.... "And [for] their saying, "Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah." And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain." Verse 157 from surah An-Nisa.
He never went to the pain of crucifixion whatsoever. Is it hard for Allah to make let's say some traitor to Isa AS to resemble his face & figure and be put to the cross? They never caught him in the first place. The keyword: "they did not crucify him" explains it all that he was never put on the cross, in fact, they never caught him.
When the soul is taken away from your body no pain to the body is endured since Allah took his soul prior to the crucifixion. Secondly if was crucified he would have died from the torment of crucifixion but but because they neither killed him nor they crucified. Thirdly how can you explain when Ibrahim AS was put on fire, was he killed or harmed? You need to use quran because it confirms everything.
The theory of substituion is totallly against the name of Allah "Rahman". Allah can do anything by his glory but still his doings are not random so that would contradict each other. That's Iblish's doing. Not Allah. Changing a person into Isa (as) and causing that man to suffer the painful death on behalf of someone else is not the behavior of Allah (swt). That's "Julm" to that particular person. Why would an innocent man should be dying just because Allah (swt) wanted to save Nabi Isa (as)? Will that person stand before Allah (swt) on judgement day and accuse Allah (swt) himself for the Julum? That makes no sense at all! -admin
@@IslamicEschatologyEnglish the traitor was put to the cross. Remember in surah Al-Maidah 115, "...but whoever disbelieves afterwards from among you - then indeed will I punish him with a punishment by which I have not punished anyone among the worlds" The traitor was warned and disbelieved. He died on the cross and felt the torment of being worshipped by the cristians.
"Another was made to resemble him to them - An Nisa 157. Clear as crystal.
I have read the Gospel of Barnabas, it is the same thing.
@@sanaf8367 read my reply to admin above.
The word "Resemble" you are saying from the translation of Sura Nisa 157 does not mean a person to be resembled into Nabi Isa (as). It means Allah made it appear the whole crucifixion process that he (as) was crucified. What I am saying "Allah made it apear", you are saying "resemble". What you are understanding it meant a person to be resembled into Nabi Isa (as) but it mainly meant the crucifixion process that Allah made it apear that he died in the cross. Here's a translation you find in google for that verse:
"and for boasting, “We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” But they neither killed nor crucified him-it was only made to appear so.1 Even those who argue for this ˹crucifixion˺ are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever-only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him."
The popular belief is such that it was a person who was the main culprit transformed into Jesus (as) and hung instead of him (as). Why did Jesus was procecuted to death? Because he declared himself as Messiah. If you believe that theory (not the Quran because it's a popular belief) that the person was transformed into Jesus (as), did that person declare himself as Messiah? Why would Allah (swt) punish a person for a cause that he never responsible for? We have been brain washed with this lazy scholarship. So, a person was not resembled into Nabi Isa (as) but whole crucifixion process was resembled into such that it appear Jesus (as) was died haning in the cross. Therefore, Allah (swt) made it appear that he died in the cross. No they did not kill him (because to be killed the soul must be taken away by Allah forever), nor crucify him (the definition of cricifixion is someone has to be dead haning on the cross). As Allah took his soul before the painful death, so the verse is correct that they could not manage to kill him and as they could not kill him that means it was not successfull as crucifixion. It was just appeared as it was. So, his body was hung on the cross but before his painful death, his soul is taken away bu Allah (swt). When they realized he was dead, they put down body and put him into a cave guarding the entrance. When his soul-less body was inside the cave alone, then Allah returned the soul and raised him to him flesh and blood. As the body was taken down soulless, it was confirmed that he was dead which is also said in the Quran that Allah made it appear as it is which yoaure reffering with your word "Resemble". But resembling a person into Isa (as) was not what Quran says, it's a popular belief if you read the foot note of that verse. -admin
The non-crucifixion of Jesus and his substitution with a double in his place is not a new doctrine brought up by Islām (seventh century C.E.), since it was long before stated by the jewish-samaritan gnostic and taumaturg Simon Magus (first century C.E., he was contemporaneous of Jesus and the apostles and knew them) and then by several christian gnostics like for example Basilides (second century C.E.), who stated that Simon of Cyrene (the one who, according to the canonical christian Gospels, helped Jesus to carry the cross on the Golgotha mount) was crucified in Jesus Christ's place perfectly looking like him:
«He [Jesus Christ] appeared, then, on earth as a man, to the nations of these powers, and wrought miracles. Wherefore he did not himself suffer death, but Simon, a certain man of Cyrene, being compelled, bore the cross in his stead; so that this latter being transfigured by him, that he might be thought to be Jesus, was crucified, through ignorance and error, while Jesus himself received the form of Simon, and, standing by, laughed at them» (quoted in: Irenaeus, Against Heresies, book I, chapter 24, section 4; Frank Leslie Cross, Elizabeth A. Livingstone, Basilides, in The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, Oxford University Press 1997, p.168).
Also the anonymous gnostic-christian book "The Second Treatise of the Great Seth" (third century C.E.), written from the first-person narrative perspective of Jesus himself, tells that he did not die on the cross and that Simon of Cyrene, perfectly resembling Jesus, died in his place:
«For my death, which they think happened, (happened) to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death... It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I. They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. It was another upon Whom they placed the crown of thorns... And I was laughing at their ignorance» (from The Second Treatise of the Great Seth, in The Nag Hammâdi Codex VII,2, english translation in Willis Barnstone, The Gnostic Bible, New Seeds 2003, 2006).
vridar.org/2007/01/13/simon-of-cyrene-simon-magus/
Sri M - The symbolic gnostic meaning of "crucifixion"
ruclips.net/user/shorts8qh_J2EcGx4?feature=share
Wise Quotes - The True Hidden Knowledge of the Cross (Gnostic Meaning).
ruclips.net/video/S3ENdJxxnEk/видео.html
How come this Imran Hossein videos pop up on my RUclips. This man refutes what Allah says and people believe him aoodhu Billahi minhu
AMEN 🙏 ❤❤❤
Idont know the topic, nor arabic language.
But know sometjing.
Same did ali r.a for our prophet s.a.u.s
AstagfurulAllah, Indeed I have forgiven you by the permission of my Lord God Allah🤲🏻
Why I said I forgive you I and Allah knows, and His Angel's! Are nearer then Mankind's Jugular Vains!
And it is A matter that itt has already decreed by the permission of Allah my Lord🎉🤲🏻
And so only ask Allah for forgiveness.
And for it you may ask one another also for forgiveness.
but sir when they put the body down it was a crucified one, where as ALLAH say nabi Issah was never crucified
The deifinition of "Crucifixion" means when someone dies on the cross. As Jesus (as) did not die on the cross, it was not considered as "Crucifixion" but Allah (swt) made it appear that he died on the cross by taking his soul away. This is how Nabi Isa (as) was not crucified and he was not killed. But yes, he was hung on the cross but his body was soul-less. -admin
Cheikh Imran seems not to comprehend the difference between the quranic words of NAFS and ROUH. the former leaves the body when we are asleep, but the latter departs from the body only once and that's when we die. The problem with cheikh Imran is that he accuses his detractors not only of ignorance but also of wickedness. Whatever the truth may be, those who assume the substitution theory are not as much categorically certain of their point of view as is cheikh imran of his "theory". Even in your late 80s, you may be wrong. Only Allah (SWT) is infallible.
Good question. The answer is by lying for generations.
You are the light for this Ummah in this dark age. Only scholar who talks sensibly and doesn't create a forced explanation just be fitting into the mainstream theory. He is a brave man and preaches only for Allah (swt). I am one of the few who were blessed by Allah (swt) discovering seikh's lectures. You need real patience and vast amount of experience in order to understand him. May Allah bless you in the highest level of Jannah.
ALLAH GIFT IS THE BEST,YOU CAN SEE IT IN HIM.HE IS THE LAST MAN STANDING.WE PRAY TO (ALLAHU SUBUHANAA WATALA) YOUR STUDENTS TO FOLLOW YOUR FOOTSTEPS.SHEIKH,YOU ARE SHAKING THE WORLD.❤
Muhammad as Surah Anfal chapter 8of of Quran openly reveals that Muhammad sustained himself entirely from the proceeds of Spoils of War Plunder Looting human trafficking slavery which becomes an integral part of Islam (Sunna of Prophet)
Anyone who questioned Muhammad was beheaded as War Mongers do
The History of Jihad from Muhammad to Isis accurately documents the horrendous crimes atrocities and eternal genocide on peaceful defenseless prosperous civilizations mainly Jews and Christians By Muhammad and later by his followers to all parts of the world
Look at the pathetic state of Islamic countries today
Afghanistan 🇦🇫 Pakistan 🇵🇰 Syria 🇸🇾 Sudan 🇸🇩 Somalia 🇸🇴 Nigeria 🇳🇬 Libya 🇱🇾 Iraq 🇮🇶 🇮🇷
Eritrea 🇪🇷 etc
Why has Allah abandoned Muslims
Are you serious? This man who you are praising sounds jaahil . He is refuting what Allah says and you are saying he is a gift from Allah yaoodhubillah minhu.
@@leefbucks ,Go with your believe and I go with my believe.may ALLAH guide you,you are loosing it bro.this sheikh, is a gift from ALLAHU SUBUHANAA WATALA.for this akirulzzam.
@@gallehbabajallow8647 You’re a jahil. If you think this man is a sheikh you’re gonna be in a shock on yaumal Qiyyamah. Don’t you know what Allah says? I implore you to safeguard your deen and don’t be like the Christians who blind follow without proof and evidence.
this opinion is wrong. Prophet Isa was replaced by another man actually. some say he was replaced by his disciple that betrayied him.
Prophet Isa was taken to the heaven by Allah, soul and body.
theres lots of this sheikh views that i dont agree. one of it he said yakjuj makjuj is the zionist or the jews in israel. his view dont align with prominent scholars.
2:10 u say that innocent man. How can u be so certain? It could be any friminal who was given the look of عيسى عليه السلام.
Could be one of the leaders or soldiers of those who wanted to crucify him. Could it not?
Nabi Isa (as) was prosecuted to death because he proclaimed himself as Messiah. By saying innocent is that person never claimed himself as Messiah. So how come Allah (swt) give punishement to someone for a cuase that he was never responsible for? -admin
@IslamicEschatologyEnglish
You are mixing up two different things over here. If you say,
He was punished because of claiming to be the messiah, the question is Is who Punished him? It was not ALLAH who punished him, It was the disbelievers who tried to punish him For claiming to be the messiah. So if ALLAH punishes one of the disbelievers by giving him the appearance of ISA A.S. How is that injustice? Is ALLAH the one who wanted to punish jesus a.s. for claiming to be messiah? If so only then Would it be injustice to punish someone else who Did not claim to be messiah.
If the kuffar wanted to punish Jesus for claiming to be messiah and God wanted to save Jesus by replacing him with one of the disbelievers, or any other criminal in the sight of GOD, that is not injustice in anyway.
And ALLAH knows best.
The Quran states that Jesus peace be upon him was “not crucified” “nor killed”. I personally believe that when Judas took the Romans to the Garden of Gethsemane and kissed Jesus pbuh on both cheeks as a signal to point him out, Jesus pbuh as a miracle swapped his appearance with that of Judas. I say this because in the bible there is contradictory accounts of Judas’s death. One version says he returned the silver and hung himself (Mathew 27: 3-10). And the other version says Judas purchased a field with the silver and fell headlong bursting his stomach (Acts 1:18). I feel that with what Judas did to Jesus pbuh it would not be unjust for Allah AWJ to use him as the substitute, The Most High warns in Proverbs 26:27 27 People who set traps for others get caught themselves. People who start landslides get crushed.
Who are the witness of this substitution? Iblis I guess
That's exactly what I believe about this matter.
yeah, the sheikh view is wrong
Prophet Isa (Jesus) was replaced by another man actually. some say he was replaced by his disciple that betrayied him.
Prophet Isa (Jesus) was taken to the heaven by Allah, soul and body.
theres lots of this sheikh views that i dont agree. one of it he said yakjuj makjuj is the zionist or the jews in israel. his view dont align with prominent scholars.
please read tafseer ibnu kathir for more accurate interpretation.
agreed. The keyword is "" And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them."
Note the word: nor they crucify him.
This is clear that his body has never been put on the cross and crucified. Crucifixion is on the physical body, not the soul. So physically he has never been put on the cross.
And the words "was made to resemble him to them" another clear-cut statement that someone else resembled him and put onto the cross.
What is the definition of "Crucifixion"? Is hanging a body on the cross meant as crucifixion or being killed on the cross is crucifixion? When you understand thr definition of this word, it would be easy to understand. As Nabi Isa's (as) soul was taken away by Allah (swt), he was not crucified. Therefore, he was also not killed. In the same verse, Allah also said, he made it appear as it is. So what Allah (swt) made appear as it is? The person Isa (as) or the whole crucifixion process? If we take the narrative from the Barnabas that Allah (swt) replace Nabi Isa (as) by another person, this contradicts Quran and Allah's behavior. Allah can not be unjust. He can not kill someone else to save another person. That sounds like movie or fairy tales. Did that person proclaim himself as Messiah? No. How come Allah (swt) do an unjust act and kill a person for a cause that he was never responsible for? Theory of substituion is not the behavior of Islam but a tale that we see in the movies often. It's a theory that did not come from Quran but Barnabas. No, Jesus was not crucified in a sense of dying haning on the cross. But Allah (swt) made it appear because he was hanged on the cross but before the painful death, Allah (swt) took his soul away. So neithger he die on the cross nor he was being crucified. But Allah (swt) made it such so that people understand he (as) died on the cross. THis is why Allah (swt) says in the Quran,"No, they did not kill him, nor crucify him - it appeared to them as if it were so." -admin
I Love the Sheik, he is a reasonate man
Munafiq
This man is lying on what Allah says about the crucifixion and you say you love him, aoodhu Billah
@@leefbucks This is sad how you are come into your conclusion without listening and thinking. Sad!
@@tanvirsennin3100 I listened to about 95% of this talk and let me tell you that anyone who denies what Allah says is treading kufr. I’m not gonna call him a kaafir it’s not my call so I will leave that up to the scholars
Surah An Nisa:157
and for boasting, "We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah." But they neither killed nor crucified him-it was only made to appear
SO.
' Even those who argue for this 'crucifixion' are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever- only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him.
So if Allah says Isa ibni Maryam alayhis salaam wasn’t crucified but your shaykh says he was then I as you who is the liar.
The corrupt Bible also says this right here
Deuteuronomy 21:23
his body shall not remain all night on the tree, but you shall bury him the same day, for a hanged man is cursed by God. You shall not defile your land that the LORD your God is giving you for an inheritance.
GOD Ascended Jesus Christ in Heaven. And he is sitting on the right hand of GOD his Heavenly Father in Heaven.
Surah An Nisa 157
And [for] their saying, "Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, the messenger of Allāh." And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain.1
Allah says for those who are in doubt about and differ about it have no knowledge of it.
Have replied this same question couple of times. Please see our replies in other comments. Thanks. -admin
@@IslamicEschatologyEnglish No need to
@@leefbucks Brother hold on. Hold your emotion. I respect that you want to protect our Deen and we should all do it but we should also not be blind out of emotion. The door of knowledge and thinking process should always be open. The first point, the extraction of knowledge from the Quran is not finished or completed. We have to search and research for answers from the Quran every time we face new challanges in different era. You can not say one is wrong just because his explanation is shaking the the belief of hundred of years. Hundred of years ago the Ulama did not know ISRAEL will be restored in Jerusalem. Since 1948, the world politics entered into new era. People are now discovering many things in a single platform because of internet and therfore, people can relate. Back then we just believe things emotionally from the Ulama what they thought is right back in that time. Does not mean the Ulamas were bad or they did not know anything or they were wrong. The best thing to say, they could not penetrate some subject of the Quran because some events still did not unfold during their time. Allah (swt) send the knowledge through someone in different time based on that era's need. Prophethood is closed but discovering knowledge or interpretation is not closed because the Ayat of Mutashabihat are there in the Quran for a reason and Allah (swt) sent the Quran for thinkers. If you say only Allah (swt) and the Aslaf can interpret the Quran, no one else, then that's different topic to discuss. But it's logical to say that any Muslim can penetrate the Quran and the truth keep remaining and rest of the penetration will be vanished throughout the time since it's Wajib for every Muslim to gather relegious knowledge. Because of this godless modern civilization, we change our path and educate ourselves in different education system and relying ourselves on Ulamas for gathering religious knowledge. Meaning we are just swallowing everything from what some particular people (Ulama) are syaing without our own study. And the capitalism social system prisoned our Ulama. Their voice will not be heard unless their voice falls into the main narrative and who set up the main narrative? Government! And who establishes the Government!? You and I? It's established by the West. That means our Intellectual Acumen to think and interest to study are blocked and controlled. Think carefully. Seikh Imran is not saying Nabi Isa (as) was Crusified. He is saying he did not die on the cross. So, both of the popular narrative and Seikh Imran's narrative are same because Quran is also saying they could not kill him. So we are good up to this. The difficulties arrise when you are saying Nabi Isa (as) never was captured, and never was put on the cross but Seikh Imran is saying, no. He was captured and he was hanging on the cross. But since Allah took his soul away, they could not manage to kill him by the definition of Crucifixion. Because the definition of Crucifixion is not when some body is haning on the cross but plain death haning on the cross. The death is must in order to complying the meaning of crucifixion. Since Nabi Isa (as) did not die in the cross, therefore, he was not crucified. So, Quran is right. Neither they kill him nor they crucify him. Meaning Nabi Isa (as) was not killed on the corss because his soul was taken away by Allah (swt). And then Allah (swt) says, he made it appear as such that everyone beleived that Nabi Isa (as) was killed on the cross. In this part the main narrative is saying Allah (swt) put some one else on the cross on behalf of Nabi Isa (as) and that person was killed in place of Jesus (as). But Seikh Imran is saying, No. Allah made it appear means, the whole crucifixion process was happening in such way that everyone saw in their own eyes that Jesus (as) died on the cross. Making it appear as it is does not mean a other person transformed into Nabi Isa (as) but the whole crucifixion process! So, Nabi Isa (as) was captured, haned on the cross but he did not feel any painful death because his body did not have any soul. When the body did not have any soul, everyone beleieved that he was dead but actually not. When they put down the body and put the body into the cave and his body was alone in the cave, in that moment Allah (swt) returned his soul and raised him onto himself flesh and blood. So, when Allah (swt) says it in the Quran that he made it appear as such, he did not mean he made it appear by transforming someone else into Nabi ISa (as) but furthering the whole crucifixion process in such a way so that they can be sure that Nabi Isa (as) died on the cross but actually not and he did it by taking his soul away. Lastly, Allah (swt) is not an unjust god. Allah (swt) can not kill someone else, an individual, for a cause that he never occured. According the main narrative, the person who was substituted, he never claimed himself as Messiah but Nabi Isa (as) was sentenced to death because of that reason. How come Allah kill a person for a cause that he never responbsible for? If that happens, does not that mean that person will stand before Allah (swt) on the judgement day and will point his finger at Allah (swt) for an unjust death? Tell me how is it possible? Is that really difficult to understand? It's not difficult to understand for us Alhamdulillah. What difficult is that you have blocked your mind out of emotion by the mainstream narratives. Remember, when Nabi Muhammad (pbuh) revealed the Quran, same thing happened to the people of Mecca. They could not beleive the truth because they blocked their mind with the old narratives of their society. Please don't fall into that category. Lastly, what Seikh Imran has given is a logical explanation of the verse 157 of Surah Nisa. But ofcourse, Allah (swt) knows the best.
@@tanvirsennin3100 Agreed!
@@tanvirsennin3100 You wrote a dag book, look Akh if your defending this man’s belief that Isa ibni Maryam was crucified after Allah says he wasn’t then your jaahil. I follow Qur’an and Sunnah from the understanding of the salaf as saleh.
Therefore you cannot find anyone who transmitted the report of his crucifixion that you can be sure is telling the truth. So how could anyone say that it was transmitted via a process of tawaatur (narrated by so many from so many)?
So I will stick to what Allah subhanahu wa ta’ala says
Surah Al Ma’idah:126
And 'on Judgment Day' Allah will say, "O Jesus, son of Mary! Remember My favour upon you and your mother: how I supported you with the holy spirit l so you spoke to people in 'your' infancy and adulthood. How I taught you writing, wisdom, the Torah, and the Gospel. How you moulded a bird from clay-by My Will-and breathed into it and it became a 'real' bird-by My Will. How you healed the blind and the lepers-by My Will. How you brought the dead to life-by My Will. How I prevented the Children of Israel from harming you when you came to them with clear proofs and the disbelievers among them said, "This is nothing but pure magic."
Surah An Nisa:157
and for boasting, "We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah." But they neither killed nor crucified him-it was only made to appear
SO.
' Even those who argue for this 'crucifixion' are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever- only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him.
I am sticking with what Allah says not some misguided shaykh that you call.
Mohammed was preaching an arian Christian doctrine. And a doscetic element to the crucifixion. Jesus being was taken out of his body. Up to paradise. He was not killed. His empty body was stabbed. Allah returned his spirit to his body.
Bring your proof that Muhammad sallallahu alayhi wa salaam was preaching a Arian Christian doctrine. First off Jesus wasn’t Christian. He was a Jew by race and a Muslim by beliefs
@@leefbucks go to book of revelation. Well attested. Johannine book. It calls isa a martyr. Before allah.
Does Allah accept intercession. Yes. As he wills. Isa as a new Adam before allah. Is the basis of first century messianic Judaism.
Did Early community at Ephesus under apostle John see him as a martyr? Simple question. Yes. The montanists understood him as a martyr. Arians did too. The monotheists accepted him as a new Adam. A martyr. Etc.
If we can show the sleepers in the cave believed in his martyrdom in Ephesus. Quran confirms it all.
Notice revelation 5 and Quran. Jesus is as Adam. Adam is given highest position before Allah. Jesus is the new Adam. Who overcame Iblis.
@@lovetwentyfourseven7428 Your lying and didn’t bring no proof. Bring me a verse where Jesus himself said he came as a Martyr? You paulians are liars!!!
Do you remember when Jesus prayed to Allah and asked him this.
Matthew 26:39
New King James Version v
39 He went a little farther and fell on His face, and prayed, saying, "O My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from Me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as You will."
Luke 22:42
"Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done.”
He prayed to his lord to save him from the being crucified because he knew how torturous it was. So if he was crucified after asking Allah to save him from it then that means Allah didn’t answer his prayer and God allowed him a horrible torture. It shows that Jesus didn’t come as a martyr so what does Allah say in the Qur’an
Surah An Nisa:157
and for boasting, "We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah." But they neither killed nor crucified him-it was only made to appear
SO. Even those who argue for this 'crucifixion' are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever- only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him.
Galatians 3:1
New International Version
You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified.
Jesus didn’t die on a cross and if you believe he did then you are calling him a person cursed.
New King James Version
Deuteronomy 21:23
his body shall not remain overnight on the tree, but you shall surely bury him that day, so that you do not defile the land which the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance; for he who is hanged is accursed of God.
Matthew 27:46
New International Version
About three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, "Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?" (which means "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?").
John 8:59 v
New International Version v
59 At this, they picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself, slipping away from the temple grounds.
Is this the lord you worship someone who is afraid off his creation. STOP THE MADNESS!!!!
I totally don't agree with this opinion, it is clearly said that he is not crusified, why interpret it otherwise?! As for the subtitution, how did you judge that it's injust? The story mentions a person who betrayed the prophet aand told the soldiers his place.. not saying it's true, but we shouldn't say for sure this is a lie or this is the truth on something we don't have a direct answer to.
Yooo school boy...
You know the different of crucifixion and crucifiction?
@mardah1
The Quran actually doesn’t say “HE was not crucified, HE was not killed.” Instead it says “THEY did not crucify him, THEY did not kill him.
(there’s a slight difference)
theres lots of this sheikh views that i dont agree. one of it he said yakjuj makjuj is the zionist or the jews in israel. his view dont align with prominent scholars.
please read tafseer ibnu kathir for more accurate interpretation. imam ibnu kathir is one of the most famous imam in quran interpretation
@@abrakadabra3765 yes that distinction is made by Dr. Ahmed didat and Dr zahir Naik, I am familiar with it
@@moosa86 I see what you're saying but this doesn't help his argument at all.
J
MashaAllah Sheilkh Imran give you more barakaats only this version make sense the rest is fairy tales
You must understand that while he was on the cross about to be crucified he mention this word "eloi eloi lama shabath tani" oh lord what have you done to me that surely tell us that he is not jesus he must be the disciple that cross jesus ??¿
There is no contradiction in bible, quran lies. Misleading and misinterpreted
There are so many bibles but one quran
1 day = 50,000 years.
So day is also not equal for other celestial bodies. 50k year refers to that is either it's path will be prolonged or the body will loose it's momentum gradually so it takes 50k years to fully rotate one time.
ruclips.net/video/pwRJCfCOisE/видео.htmlsi=LPBwnr50W7Nh24sj