My photo BROKE the Internet 💥
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 май 2024
- After posting what seemed like a simple photo, controversy flooded in, but not in ways you might think. In this episode I explain that photo, why it was controversial, how I edited it, and how it is the tip of a much bigger issue. Below are links mentioned in the video:
Online courses to learn Real Estate Photography:
LearnRE.NathanCool.com
Learn Pro Interior Photography:
ProInteriors.NathanCool.com
Expert Editing for Interior Photography:
ExpertEditing.NathanCool.com
Learn Pro Exterior Photography:
ProExteriors.NathanCool.com
My books on real estate photography:
amzn.to/3T84iax 
Хобби
The people criticizing the photo certainly aren't the ones hiring you to work for them. That photo edit was great! I would be very happy if I was your customer.
Always trust your guide and still use your editing method from day one. You're the best Nathan. Keep doing your best of work.
Thank you for the pricing guide in the video, very helpful even though we are in different markets.
Great video! The remove tool has saved so much time editing the camera out of reflective surfaces & mirrors, and also unavoidable ceiling fan shadows. I also love generative fill to improve sellers’ wilted houseplants - lots of those in old people’s homes!
Hi Nathan, high trees (the best) catch a lot of wind, usually due to jalousy .
Just wanted to drop you a comment thank you so much for your work. I’ve been full-time real estate photographer for four years now after buying your books watching all your videos and treating your information as free education, it’s paid off and I appreciate being able to watch your videos and learn for free.
Super video! Thanks, Nathan.
People on the internet have eyes like hawks lol. Great work as always
It was interesting to learn about the different markets for real estate photography beyond just listings, and how important edits can be for marketing purposes. The generative fill technique seems very useful for replacing unwanted views out windows. I can see how understanding these techniques helps open up more opportunities.
Good work as usual Nathan :)
I see this as no different than cleaning up an otherwise nice shot for my portfolio. I want the final product to represent the nice clean interior, not some crap that happened to be visible through the window when it was listed.
Anyone criticizing you obviously knows nothing of the photography industry. First you need to identify your role. Are you working in the Documentary / Photojournalist role as a true anthropologist, or are you working as a Commercial / Art photographer? If you don’t know the difference between the two. Then you know nothing about the craft of photography 🍃
Interesting ethical dilemma - suppose you're photographing a property next to a very unsightly neighboring property (visible from the property you are highlighting). How much do you decide not to show before you are "lying by omission"? (I assume most people would agree that it would deceptive to omit, for example, visible black mold in the property, unless it was otherwise clearly described in the listing). Where is the boundary between showing the property in a positive way and showing it in an unrealistic way? (Portrait photographers have exactly the same dilemma.) (I'm fascinated by this question.)(Edited to add: I completely get that the photo under discussion here was an interior design shot and so the dilemma doesn't arise here.)
There is no such thing in REP listing work as "lying by omission". Anyone can take unfavorable or favorable shots of any property. It's what you add or change that's the concern. Still, you should suggest things to your clients if you encounter any issues they should be aware of.