so looking at time stamp 2:14, these are two different edits. That is to say who ever edit the dvd vs blue ray used different director cuts. This is clear by the Red alert and the hand movement, which can be from two sources. A post production version were the effects were added and then reshot with another take and combined. Remember Star Trek use blue screen so it was pretty easy to have several post production versions of scenes. With the Editor director looks at footage to remaster he might be pulling from several reels which can also be based on what has survived storage over the years.
Not sure what you mean - 2:04? Yes, they didn't only fix the disappearing planet, they used a completely different shot of Sulu and the other character. Weird choice
@@TrekkieChannel Although produced different version for DVD vs Blue Ray. there are always several footage from different director cuts, the editor normally have artistic control on which one to use. In this case they may not have had access to the same cuts. Just saying nothing rare.
What do you mean? If you are talking about the black and white shot, it's just to tell you visually that there are no changes. It's too short, if it was longer I would cut it out
None of TOS was mastered from the negative. You’ll notice early cuts as the original faded to the next original effect. They had to cut before the fades on each show to the cgi unfortunately.
Please, don't add, don't subtract. Just clean the prints and show me what everyone saw in the 60s. Please. But but we can make it better. Better to who? What does "better" mean? I was born in 77 let me just see what I would have watched on network television if I had tuned in. No CGI please, especially not Enterprise. Models look better.
I still can't get over Star Trek's original FX for its time.
Another great and thorough video cheers.
Thanks, glad you folks like them
TrekkieChannel love them! Always a joy whenever I see a new one, and I’ll rewatch old favourites on occasion, so thanks so much.
The spiraling reminds me of a Tom Baker episode on Dr. WHO. Getting whirlies and don't feel well.
so looking at time stamp 2:14, these are two different edits. That is to say who ever edit the dvd vs blue ray used different director cuts. This is clear by the Red alert and the hand movement, which can be from two sources. A post production version were the effects were added and then reshot with another take and combined. Remember Star Trek use blue screen so it was pretty easy to have several post production versions of scenes. With the Editor director looks at footage to remaster he might be pulling from several reels which can also be based on what has survived storage over the years.
Not sure what you mean - 2:04? Yes, they didn't only fix the disappearing planet, they used a completely different shot of Sulu and the other character. Weird choice
@@TrekkieChannel Although produced different version for DVD vs Blue Ray. there are always several footage from different director cuts, the editor normally have artistic control on which one to use. In this case they may not have had access to the same cuts. Just saying nothing rare.
What happened at 6:54? Confused!
What do you mean? If you are talking about the black and white shot, it's just to tell you visually that there are no changes. It's too short, if it was longer I would cut it out
@@pittrek81 Ah, okay, thanks!
I kind of like the original effects in some cases. Most of them are great improvements however.
I'm not nuts about adding CGI effects to old films, TV shows but they did try and capture the spirit of the original so overall it works.
None of TOS was mastered from the negative. You’ll notice early cuts as the original faded to the next original effect. They had to cut before the fades on each show to the cgi unfortunately.
Well in the promotional materials they claimed they DID scan the original negatives. But as Okuda admitted, "sometimes" they didn't.
Please, don't add, don't subtract. Just clean the prints and show me what everyone saw in the 60s. Please. But but we can make it better. Better to who? What does "better" mean? I was born in 77 let me just see what I would have watched on network television if I had tuned in. No CGI please, especially not Enterprise. Models look better.
FFS Is it just gonna just be constant reading 4 the full 13 Mins? 🤬🤬🤬
Apologies The Reading wasn’t excessive after The initial 2 Mins or so...