150fps+ In Microsoft Flight Simulator - RTX 4090 Thoughts On DLSS 3.0
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- The GeForce RTX 4090 delivers some impressive performance boosts in Microsoft Flight Simulator using DLSS 3.0. This brings some significant frame rate increases even in the most CPU limited locations. The RTX 4090 was provided by Nvidia.
For more information on the RTX 4090 do check on the following videos:
Digital Foundry - "Nvidia DLSS 3 Analysis: Image Quality, Latency, V-Sync + Testing Methodology"
• Nvidia DLSS 3 Analysis...
Digital Foundry - "Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Review: The Next Level In Graphics Performance"
• Nvidia GeForce RTX 409...
Linus Tech Tips - "Double your FPS for FREE!*** - Nvidia DLSS 3.0"
Music
Epidemic Sound
#microsoftflightsimulator #rtx4090
Swap DLSS with TAA in the Anti-aliasing setting. You will still be able to use Frame Generation, but the sim will look even better! It's especially noticeable when you look at water.
Yup and the screens are much sharper. The frame rates were welcoming but those blurry screens I just couldn't do it. Nvidia is supposed to update DLSS 3 some time this year
@@denziiey any luck updating to the new 2.5.1 dll ? (from portal RTX)
@@amiththomas3884 I'll have to check. I haven't seen any driver or firmware updates show up. I'll check!
Absolutely, that’s the best way to play!
Does that work in VR
Locked behind a crazy price . Anyone on AM4 playing MSFS2020 5800x3d is your goto cpu and pairs nicely with this card
Yep.
@@billbrowning3021 yup. But paired mine with a 4080. Not sure if there's much difference between the 4080 and 4090 because I use 1440p. 4K I would say 4090 for sure
I'm using it with a 4080, never been happier
@user-ei7lz2mt5y 4080 is a solid card and at 1440p you would be stupid to get the 4090 unless all you do is VR gaming and even then the 4080 is a very strong card
Not for the price NVIDIA! No matter how many cards you throw at content creators!
Nvidia is so desperate to sell 4000 series and no one wants them because of the price. It's cool seeing these framerates (although the artifacting is terrible), but please don't buy these cards until they come down in price AND iron out the issues with DLSS 3.
4090 is sold out in the US still.
Lies bro. Nvidia outselling AMD 7000 series. The RTX4080 is the only one underpeforming in sales. I bought a 4090 and no regrets this thing absolutely is killing MSFS paired with my 5800X3D. Maxed out getting 100+ with Fenix A320. Yeah believe that. Plus on the ground with traffic getting 100 fps in certain airports and 60 in bigger airports with traffic. Yeah I'll gladly pay my money.
the 4090 isnt really the issue in terms of pricing, it is the 4080 and the 4070ti which are overpriced
What are you talking about? Simmers are the ones gobbling up these 4090s. This card is realization of a dream. We’re talking about people with $500 HOTAS custom build cockpits. If they can afford it, they don’t flinch. Nobody is out there with a 4090 RTX so he can play Spider-Man at 100 FPS.
@@denziiey oh my you went overboard
After you mentioned the usage of wattage, i noticed it actually went to 350+ watts multiple times over longer times. Yeah, it's a lovely card.... massively big and massively priced. And it still depends on the combo of MB, CPU and memory, as the game has always been. And thanks for the comparison video!!
idk if it's overpriced...it's just out of my price range for sure. This is a top tier premium GPU!
However 4080 and 4070 ti are def overpriced...
Thanks for your video. The 4090 shines at higher resolution. Put the renderscale in Msfs to 130 or higher and you will see that the GPU gets over 50% and the FPS are rising. In VR I get 2 times more FPS than with my 3090. Msfs is by the way not CPU bound. The problem is that only a few cores are used. It is not very good in multithreading. But that has nothing do do with the performance of the 4090.
That card is like a turbo engine. It needs higher resolution. For example in VR
In normal TAA or DLSS mode it is likely as fast as a 3090. DLSS 3 is not really efficient ATM and you definitely see any difference while flying.
For 2D flying the card is absolutely not necessary. But essentially for VR flying.
That still is a CPU bound, it's just a more difficult one to overcome as you can't just add more cores. Simulations just require high single-thread performance and large cache by the very nature of how they tie everything in to the simulation.
I got my 4090 last week and are super impressed. I get 100fps in atmospheric clouds at very high even in star citizen which is far more punishing on gpus than optimized games. The RTX4090 is just ridiculously fast.
no kidding sherlock
I'm still on my RTX 3070 and I lock my frames at 30fps. It always looks beautiful and smooth to me, but I must admit, your demonstration here is phenomenal.
I'm on a GTX 1070ti and also lock at 30fps and 1080p. It also looks beautiful to me and while I can't claim everything is smooth, for the vast majority it is smooth.
Very happy with 30fps at 2k with my 3060...😎👍
@@rabbie68 Yes, 2K here too. 32". Looks great.
I agree (25fps on my GTX 1060). Some Hollywood films are filmed at 24fps (cinema look).
Yes, I'm also locked at around 30 FPS (33.3) - watching the footage over here makes me uncomfortable not because of high frames but these micro stutters honestly drive me crazy. These are not that noticeable on lower FPS imho. I'm for now fine with what my RTX 2080ti offers me and now I'm just waiting for some RTX effects like lights, ray tracing, shadows and reflections (which I hope will come down the road!)
With DLSS3 there are issues with ghosting digits EG when you're climbing and you watch your altitude/speed readings the digit's
motion blur.I don't understand why this isn't spoken about! It makes DLSS basically useless with glass cockpits
at........................................... 300W !! Cap it to 30fps - literally just as good. You just don;t need this sort of FPS for MSFS2020.
The new X3D amd chips should be amazing with this sim
MSFS is absolutely the best visual game i have ever seen. (well google earth in VR comes close ) but i just use VR only, i think we still need much more power. Owning a 4090 now but cant wait to get my hands on a 5090 or even 6090 in 6 years. By then Unreal6 will make everything so foto realistic we wont be able to see the difference between VR and the real world. And 6 years is not long anymore ;-)
That overhead shot of the Jet at 13:28 is worth an oscar. Great review!!!!
Absolutely love the 4090. Ultra settings in my HP Reverb G2 is an absolutel marvel, I don't even use DLSS 3.0 as that's not supported in VR but of course you can still get synthetic frames through MSFS (ugly) and OpenXR reprojection or most probably with whatever VR base software you are using. The 4090 is a beast of a card but expensive for what it is if you don't need the extra performance. My personal view was it was an instant buy and I've absolutely loving my simming right now.
Wow your great 🥱
Top card, I got a decent deal on mine, I managed to get the MSI Trio 4090 second hand for £1450
I bought a 4070. Despite being no where as powerful as the 4090 its is the best investment I have made for this sim along with the 5800X3D! I had an AMD GPU and that was problematic with X-PLANE 12. I'll be sticking with Nvidia moving forward!
I just installed a RTX 4090 as well, but in MS Flightsim it shows 0 to 1% usage?! CPU is a i7-11700K, so not the slowest too... The monitor shows really high FPS, but the actual picture is stuttering heavily, especially over cities.. Any tipps of how to improve?
Still rocking the 2070S. Manage to get 60fps in most areas with mostly high graphics. Don't mind one bit
Same over here with my beloved 2080ti - it's for now just about extra high FPS which might play a role on shooters and VR but on casual flying aircraft on a flat screen? Nah. As long as I can see the same artifacts (ghosting on clouds and stuff) I will not invest into a money burning heating device :) RTX 5k series with some i9 15900k maybe, but until then I'll just look at 3090ti's getting "cheap" at some spot.
Same here, the 4090 costs more than my entire build at the time lol
What sort of fps would i get using an i5 cpu 32g ram and rtx 3060, if i bought msfs. ive the same setup for x-plane 12 and the fps are atrocious.
MSFS really hasn't been CPU limited for years, in fact it moved away from being CPU bound back in DTG FSW when they took the FSX code and ported it to 64 bit and made it multi threaded and focused on pushing more onto the GPU. Asobo inhertited DTG's data and all the work they had done in the port and then built further on it for MSFS and replaced a ton of stuff as well.
Did Nvidia with the free 4090 also require you to link to only positive coverage of DLSS 3 and positive 4090 reviews? Feels kinda shilly to me
I’m looking at changing my 3080 for a 4080 in the summer, but cannot justify the cost of a 4090. I get min 25fps on ultra in 1080p coming over London at 3k feet on final into EGLL. This for me is perfectly acceptable in what is mostly a GA and commercial sim.
you'd be crazy to run a 4090 at 1080p. Your uplift will be minimal unless you're pushing ray tracing at crazy high fps (240hz)
Mark, quick question: which CPU do you have? Thanks!! 🙏🏼
@@anisdridi2488 i7 12700k
I'd love to get the RTX 4090 but I can't find a place to put my desktop PC inside it.
Just got my 4090 yesterday. Upgraded from a 3090ti and it’s phenomenal. I have it locked at 30 fps smooth as butter and everything on ultra except I have it on 300 instead of 400 for land detail but I have AI traffic on almost at 100 on everything and I’m at 4k monitor. Truly amazing . I fly PMDG .
I have a 3090ti as well and I'm wondering what your card would be like on xplane 12. I don't use fs2020 not really a fan.
@@simcptmike I don’t own xplane but I still have P3Dv5.3 installed, I don’t have the heart to uninstall it as FSX also. I did a flight on P3D and I was getting frames from 68-73 on the ground with almost all sliders max. Graphic wise it was maxed. I don’t know how xplane runs but FSX and P3d are very, very CPU intensive as is FS2020. I should have mentioned that I also got a 13 gen I9-13900k cpu. I had a 12th gen i9-12900k cpu and when I installed the card, the CPU was weak against the 4090 and it was bottlenecking the CPU. Now, with the 13th gen, it’s the opposite. The CPU is too powerful for the 4090 which is what we want that way the card can use it’s maximum capability graphic wise. Before the 13th gen upgrade, my card was at a cooling 42c, never got hot and I found that odd. Well, it turns out it wasn’t using its full capability because of the 12th gen CPU. I upgraded the 13th gen so that I could have 60fps lock and literally unlocked I get like 80fps on the ground and like 122-130 in the air but I lock my sims. If xplane is CPU intensive like past and present sims, your going to have to get the 13gen cpu along with the 4090. It’s like the 13gen was built for the 4090 and future GPU. It’s a powerhouse of a CPU and if I had great FPS with p3d, like no other time in flight sim history, I’m 99.9% sure xplane will run very very good especially since xplane is a newer program and coding than p3d and FSX. On MSFS2020, I did a test. Without AI generation and DX12 activated on fs2020 , regular DX 11 with TAA instead of DLSS 3and everything on Ultra maxed except terrain LOD I set at 300 instead of 400 even AI traffic with planes, airport vehicles, workers etc, I was running a smooth butter 30 fps locked. Now I have it locked at 60 fps and it’s smooth as butter. I also set p3d to 55 fps locked and it’s smooth as butter also. In short, I honestly think the 4090 will do wonders for xplane also but I recommend to get the 13gen cpu with it or if you use AMD, research which is equivalent as I do not know AMD. I recommend locking your fps also as it really really helps. This the is the build that gives me exactly what I want for flight sim and it’s not disappointing at all. Pricey but very very worth it. I won’t have to upgrade anymore for any flight sim payware add on , airports, planes until they make the new Microsoft simulator which will be in like 15-20 years. I only changed the cpu and the card, everything else stayed the same. These are my specs if it helps.
13th Gen i9-13900k Raptor Lake intel
Zotac 4090 RTX
MSI Z690 Force Wi-Fi Motherboard 1700 socket (same one used for the 12th gen i9-12900k)
OLOY DDR5 RAM 32gb
Kraken Z73 RGB water cooler
Samsung 980 Pro 2tb SSD x 2
1300W Gold PSU
Everything on this spec is 9 months old except the CPU and GPU, upgraded from 12th Gen i9-12900k to the 13th and the Zotac 3090 ti to the 4090.
Also the 12th gen i9-12900k works very great hand in hand with the 3090ti
@@rockyjetproject1345 this is a super helpful and detailed response. Thank you very much!
07:00 which landscape is it?
Thank you for this very insightful video. How is your experience at busy airports such as KJFK or EGLL, using third party airport addons, and using FSLTL with, e.g., 100 active IFR aircraft? Will MSI Afterburner with Frame Generation set to ON still show at least 60 FPS (maybe capped through V-Sync at 60 FPS)?
A lot of movies show DLSS 3 and the frame boost it generates. Unfortunately, no one talks about the issues with DX12, DLSS 3, and Nvidia Frame Generation. When using aircraft such as the Fenix A320, PMDG 737, or even the JPLogistic Cessna 152, the scenery textures fall apart, particularly at airports. Fenix's technical support made it clear that they are aware of the issue, but it is due to DX12 (beta) and DLSS 3. I believe they are right about this. Additionally, DLSS 3's sharpness is far from what we get with TAA.
Unfortunately, in VR instruments and screens are much sharper and easier to read in TAA.
Finally, it is not only the number of FPS that is important, it is also the micro jerks, that is what bothers me the most. But in order to find the exact causes, it is more difficult. I saw that you also had some. Perhaps the fault of MSFS?
I just gave a 4070 a test run and the micro jerks made me return it. I currently run a 1660 Super and it has the same issue but for a $200 card I'll take it any day. Looked up hundreds of forums and never did find any resolution over the few days I had the 4070
I think MSFS is a perfect use case for DLSS3 and it should only get better. Another, possibly better upgrade for it would be a serious improvement for the way it utilises CPU threads. Like you have already said it is seriously limited by CPU factors. It physically can't fully load your graphics card due to being hampered, both CPU and GPU load are less than 50%
A further tip, if your gameplay never goes below 60 fps no matter where or what, then you should set and lock your fps to 60, the flying experience, system load, power consumption, etc... all will work better and efficiently.
I can tell the difference between 100 frames per second and 60 frames per second. I also prefer that my GPU works at 100% at all times.
@@jamesm568 What difference is there between 100 and 60
@@archvile1313 60 FPS is a little jerky as 100 FPS is a whole lot smoother. Depends on the aircraft though. Fast moving aircraft the 60 FPS sucks at low altitude mountain flying.
@@jamesm568 I hardly notice a difference with what you're telling me but I will see more into it.
@@archvile1313 IPS or VA panel?
All in all it's really not our graphic cards that is at fault. ASOBO needs to focus their energy optimizing the sim. It has gotten worse, and the LOD is disgustingly short. It looks terrible.
I wasn't going to get the 4090. My system is a year old, all white, stunning looking with a 3090, and cost shy of 8K. BUT ... I had a chance to buy a white 4090 last week and couldn't help myself. I bought one and don't regret it at all. Stupid money for sure, but what can I say.
Does nVidia require you to return the card after your video or can you keep it?
please what's the locations at 07:00 and 10:45?
Crazy performance. On my 13600K + RTX3080 + 32gb DDR runing at 3440x1440 with default "ultra" settings I'm still not getting stable 60fps. Even with fps limited to 50% screen (120hz). On busy areas, still notice some drops and minor stutters. Crazy you have to spend so much money to get stable 60fps.
Did you set your ram frequency?
I dont get the point of this. The best part of high frame rates isn't the visuals. But control latency, physics calculations, etc. This doesn't improve any of the that and 75fps is already smooth motion if the frame pacing is consistent.
Also I notice the ghosting immediately. It's really obvious because it looks like flickering in your video.
it really is a spectacle running msfs at ultra graphics smoothly, its just a complete new realistic experience with my upgrade from an rtx 3060 ti to my rtx 4080 super!
Thanks. If it's not a hassle, could you add locations you fly over in the description? Some areas are gorgeous.
With the ever-rising cost of energy in the UK, I'm priced out of the higher-end GPUs even before the price of buying the thing comes into the equation. I simply cannot afford to game with high-end gear. I have to go with lower-end or mid-range gear that gets the most bang for it's buck.
With that said, DLSS3 looks just the ticket for MSFS, and I'm seriously considering upgrading to maybe a 4060 from my current 3070 (pending reviews and benchmarks of course).
I would not especially care if every other game saw very little improvement on a 4060 over my 3070. All I would really care about would be what DLSS3 did for performance in MSFS, both pancake and in VR. If a 4060 or 4060Ti could give me perhaps double the fps in MSFS using DLSS3, and could do it for minimal, if any, extra power draw than my 3070 currently is sucking, then I'm in.
What I‘d really love to see is a set of untitled A/B comparisons, split screen if possible, between varying locations in the sim with DLSS turned on/off. Then let’s see if anyone watching can see a difference. In fairness, since the video is limited to 2k60…it seems unlikely, but you never know… Maybe you could capture the video in 4k120 and upload it somewhere so we can play it locally and see if we can spot the difference?
I use a 4K Samsung 55 inch tv as monitor, and it has a refresh rate of 60 Hertz a 4 K resolution, so all fps above 60 is actually overkill .
I have set VSync on at half refresh rate in the Nvidia panel, and frame generation on in msfs using DLSS3 , so get 60 fps, but more important , my power use of the 4090 drops by a give or take 100 Watts and still get butter smooth flying , temp and % also drops with all settings at ultra
As an Xbox player, I'm envious about such a smooth framerate, but only until I think about the completely outlandish price tag on these PCs as well as the high power consumption. 30 fps in MSFS on Xbox might be jerky and low, but I hope the next Xbox will be able to run it at 60 fps with similarly affordable price and economical operation.
PLEASE could you tell us where we can find this HUGE volcanic plateau at 8:15 , also where are you flying at 10:45. we neeeed to know!
Now if us plebs could get our hands on 4090s without having to pay crazy gouged prices, that would be great
I do still wish things would be a bit better eg bridges, water levels and such. I know it's asking a lot and i do think the game is beautiful.
Appreciate the feedback. I struggle to understand why we would need 100+ FPS when our displays are limited to 60Hz, but it's good it's kept at a minimum of 60 as you mentioned. Not clear if you're using a 60 or 120Hz monitor. I'm checking whether 4080 to 4070Ti can still maintain this 60 FPS minimum at 4K.
Input lag decreases as the frame rate increases. Even up to 300+ FPS
@@metalheaddw05 Alright, so still useful
DLss3 is amazing technology,, I can't wait until AMD frame generation comes out later on to compare technology with DLlS3.
I have 4090 and use Dlss 3 and frame generation to achieve around 70fps on ultra 4k. Today I disabled frame generation, and the quality was excellent. My conclusion is DLSS 3 is more quantity than quality. In red dead redemption, it gives better improvements and performance compared to msfs.
The reviewer is saying astonishing quality because he got a free unit 😂
You'll need a better CPU to fully utilise that 4090. There's no current gen CPU that doesn't bottleneck that GC.
the ghosting in "high terrain passing speed" situations (on ground level/ near ground level) is completely inacceptable for me , i have disabled this feature. also with gsync at ~70 fps to me it feels exactly as smooth as when i have ~150fps with framegen enabled. so no benefit but the artifacts as a big drawback.
what some have said in the forums is that framegen introduces an input lag. i cannot confirm or deny this. but i guess it has to be tested with a very responsive flight model like the su-31 or the pitts s2s to notice a difference.
Great video, thank you ! Please can you do a test between a 4K screen and a 4K VR headset ? See the difference of framerate would be very interesting !
I'm on 3080 right now. I think the way things are going, I won't be upgrading my GPU until the 8080 comes out. Sadge.
Just wondering what software you are using to get those distance and ultra smooth videos of your aircraft. like towards the end of this video above ? Thanks.
Still goes to its knees at KJFK, empty airport. Didn't see any other traffic there during the climb outs with that A320.
Is this a reference card / founders edition he has been sent by NVIDIA?
The adapter cord that came with the Founders card worked fine for you or are you using another adapter?
Awfully tempting until I look at the prices again lol
It’s such a shame that the market is monopolised, what crazy cards and prices we could get otherwise
Did AMD stop making Radeons?
@@AwestrikeFearofGods Their gpus aren't shaking the market like their cpus did.
MSFS is CPU limited, u need to use Ryzen 7000 with 4090 to enjoy the potensial
5800x3d
I have the 4080 and I it runs amazing on Ultra graphics in VR. I went from the ASUS ROG STRIX 1080 to a ASUS TUF 4080 and what a huge jump. I'm getting 50-70fps in VR on Ultra settings with DLSS 3. The biggest improvement is in DCS. I was using OpenXR on DCS, but the new update for WMR for SteamVR made it better than OpenXR. Getting 5fps more and better frame timings with SteamVR.
I mean you jumped 3 generations, of course it's going to be a huge improvement lol
@@yobb1n544 Was like when I went from the 460 to the 970, lol.
@@ComdrStew yup, 3 generations is a long time in the tech industry 😂
The only thing I hate is the 1080 was $600 and the 4080 is $1200. Even inflation adjusted that's unacceptable on nvidias part.
@@yobb1n544 I figured the 4080 was going to be around $899. Shocked the shit out of me, lol.
@@ComdrStew yup, nvidia 🤬🤬
The thing I found that helps the most is turn that lens flare BS off. I'm looking at a 4090 myself, but I want the best 4090 money can buy though.
i so wish flight simulator would have proper vr menus and all that
Hi, great content! What place is the "jungle" section?
Would LOVE to know how your 4090 rig holds up in ED: Odyssey as it's so demanding/poorly optimised. DO ONE OF THOSE VIDS PLEASE!
Thanks for this video and it convinced me to buy the 4090! I am running on the 5950X and I can delay my CPU upgrade now :D
How is your experience with DLSS 3.0 and moving objects in the Sim, i.e. air traffic, airport vehicles, road traffic, ships? These place a heavy burden on the Sim, but how does the RTX 4090 handle it?
Anyone else notice the un-rendered bridges @5:48? ...with cars still traversing it?
You don’t have to use DLSS to get frame generation, you can turn it on without DLSS. I use TAA with frame generation to get a better picture.
If nvidia sends you a 4090 for a 15 minute video, I hope they keep it up. Good for you, congrats.
Turn on Vsync in Nvidia control panel and set latency mode to Ultra and that eliminates ghosting.
Really, wow! I didn't realize there was a working fix for it. The ghosting is so annoying!
what is ghosting
@J. A. when an image moves on screen, it will create a visible trail of pixels that haven't reacted quickly enough behind an object or background. Ghosting can be caused by lots of things, but early LCD screens seemed to have it the worst. In flight simulator, it seems to be more of a graphics engine problem.
It's crazy to see even with that card you can catch stutters.
microsoft's software quality is really bad these days. There seems to be lot's of blocking goin' on in their multithreading code.
If you only play in vr and the money the 4090 is a must, I only bought msfs after getting mine
I just wish Nvidia would sell 4090 FEs directly from their website.
I was previously using a gtx 1080 seahawk which is a GPU that comes with a waterblock from the factor, I lost that GPU due to a power surge, but when I used the GPU my rackmounted case would barely close it's lid as in it buldges where the inlet/outlet of the waterblock is.
I found a waterblock that moves the inlet/outlet ports to the rear of the GPU. What I'm using is a rackmounted case, and I'm currently u R7800 GPU that's 10 years of age with a 9900k. I wish Nvidia would sell FE 4090s directly off their website for MSRP.. I want to upgrade to a 40inch ultrawide 5K by 2k monitor for stock trading from a Chinese brand 1080p 27inch TV.
I own guns and there was a time where I couldn't get ammo without paying through the nose to scalpers for 5 years at one time. I refused to award the ammo scalpers and I also refuse to award the GPU scalpers.
If your monitor supports 4096x2160, change the resolution on the game to that, and the graphics will look even better with true 4K.
I can't wait until they update the card in future to a quarter of the size for less than 200, requiring under 100W and half a fan
Theres something wrong with the optimization on msfs atm. The 4090 only gets 30% usage. I get almost double the frames in other games compared to my old 3090 ti but only less than 10% on the 4090
whats you pc spec besides of the 4090? whats the best way to minimize the frametime?
Frame generation is not really a new technology, mpeg video compression uses it too (the I, P, and B frames), but it is clever for Nvidia to adopt this technology in GPUs.
Higher frame rate at the cost of resolution is nothing new
Would love the same for Elite Dangerous odyssey
I just got my 4090 this weekend, I have to give it a try in FS still
1:50 the building is too close i think 1:53 yep!too close 1:54 omg...short video 1:55 lucky bastard :P
Phew , bit close to that tower for comfort.
Me with my 2-year-old 3060:
what is your opinion about this card in regards with higher frame rate (what is the best frame rate for msfx?), speed and quality ???/ does the speed of internet has any affect on it? i wanna use 3 projectors and steam gauges for my flight sim. how many connection it has for different monitors??? please answer my questions because i am going to build a very serious flight simulator. how about i9 core CPU? does it go well with this card?
. this card in my country is too expensive 380,00 yen. very very expensive but i also understand nice things cost money.
1:50 ....BALLS OF STEEL!!!
Next year is the best time to buy a laptop with 3nm cpu and gpu. Amd 8040 cpu and Nvidia 5080 will be fast enough to play this at 4k with zero stutter
Moving the camera around and around does not help your credibility. Impossible to get a good look. I hope you enjoy it
I hate how generic new york looks without photogeometry enabled. I have poor internet so this is the option I use and seeing you stream the proper version makes me sad regardless of what GPU im using.
Two questions: If MSFS is limited by the CPU, does that mean it is limited by the hardware, or is the software itself limited? I've read that MSFS doesn't utilize the CPU very well.
Second question, what kind of frame rates can you get with three screens?
msfs does not utilize multi core very well, at most it will just one or two cores
@@uraymeiviar it uses more than two cores but most of the code does go through just two so those end up maxing out and being the limiting factor.
Little question; Is my internet speed (approx. 93 Mbps/sec) sufficient for a result (visual/fps) similar to yours? THANKS!
When they fix the blurry screens in the cockpit, i'll buy one
i run a 2080 gtx, ryzen 5 5600x, 32 gigs 3200 ram. i was able to go from low to medium settings just by switching from a mechanical to ssd hard drive
Thanks for this beautiful video, as allways.
Are performances also better when using VR ?
Hi, yep the 4090 shines at higher resolution like in VR. I get 2x FPS in VR in comparison to my old 3090
I have a 4070ti and its great with VR in the PMDG 737-800. if you don't wanna go blow 2,000 on a card lol.
cutting it a little close to the Empire State building there...
Very interesting! Thanks, ObsidianAnt!
Will the 4090 be good with a 10700kf processor at 1080p (on 3 monitors)? Z490 mobo. Any issues?
My 2080ti is useless 😒 for msfs2020..
I don't even get the option of DLSS despite having a 4090, it was there with my 3090 but not anymore.
Wondering how much GPU resources are used recording the screen?
How do you get such good telemetry? Fast internet speed?
Am a fan of MSFS, but although I treated myself to a 4090 retirement gift now I am sadly aware that my i9 9900 is the bottleneck. Of course that cpu has a different socket, so upgrade requires new motherboard.... sigh it was ever thus...