They managed to check my operators ID name on PNC at the road side and then wanted me to show ID to prove it matched myself as the flyer (which is doesn't need to by the way). They issued a producer at the roadside to make sure I did provide my name (very bad practice). You do not need a flyers ID for a 249g Drone, and as long as the Operator ID is displayed on the outside, then your following the law on that one. Line of sight, well if they have someone willing to make a statement or video evidence then that could be an offence but it didn't look a massive area from your footage and you certainly didn't go out of sight on the footage you published. So this makes very little sense to me. I think his Ego got the better of him and he couldn't stop until he had your details. This station is firmly on my list for when I return. Great video mate. ❤
@@ReggiePhoto please do a few audits with dj, I think it would be a right laugh especially if you take a wig for dj to wear too 🤣 P.s I love the name tattooed on your left wrist. It's not often I see my name on people/things ☺️
The problem is that these "payouts" come out of the public purse. The only way for these to be effective is if they came out of the police officers' pockets!
Sooner it comes out of the Muppets pocket the better. Policing will change rapidly and we will get more professional constables who work without ego. (edit cos I am a blind git!)
@Brian Mooney So, theres no crime committed apart from a copper who is clearly demented, arrests and takes an innocent man 15 miles away, discovers he is wrong, then makes an innocent man walk back or hire a taxi at his expense, through the coppers incompetence ? What would you expect to happen if it was a lone female ?
@Brian Mooney Then it must be correct if you said so, maybe you are just as ignorant of drone laws as the arresting copper who messed up. And maybe Reggie can clear this up, did they give you a bus token ?
Omg, this copper is an absolute muppet. You absolutely tied him in knots and got him to admit he arrested you under no grounds or section. Easiest claim....ever!
@Brian Mooney I assume you're being sarcastic as your own comment quite clearly states its one of the most unlawful arrests you've seen? Strange comment to make. 🤔
@Brian Mooney well that's funny mate, as it takes me to the same profile with the same 8 videos, so I'm gonna call bullsh1t mate. If you're nit going to be honest please don't reply. Nothing worse.
@@patrickhouston2610 just a wind up pal. Somewhere in his mind he thinks he's funny or smart or something. Idiots like this I leave them to it He has even trolled people on his on comment 🙄. Possibly bullied in school and now thinks this is the way to behave hiding behind a keyboard. Who knows
That Officer should have exercised his right to silence. He has incriminated himself with his own words. He admitted he has presumed you guilty without reasonable grounds, and he admitted that he would let you go if you gave your details, which means he was using the arrest to coerce you into giving your details.
It's disgusting how they can just dump you miles from where you were. What would have happened if you didn't have the funds to get back to your car? When you sue them, make sure you include the time it took to get back to your vehicle and the cost incurred. Tyrants indeed.
Get the f-----s sued, and claim for travelling expenses and whatever else you can do them for. Totally unlawful arrest and total f-----g incompetence. I'll chip in towards legal expenses and I'm sure many of your subscribers will too.
"How am I supposed to get my hands on you?" You are supposed to have a good grasp of the law you are enforcing, if you don't agree with it then petition to change it, not just arrest people first.
I am so sad that this has happened to you again. What has this country become! Good luck with everything Reggie and thank you for your brilliant videos.
He needs to be fucking SACKED Guy looks about 70, his time has passed.. retire or sack him. I would go back to that police station and fly the drone after this so called "Arrest" lol just to spite em.
@@stevenhastings1942 He's done nothing wrong, flying a drone under 250 is 100% LEGAL even over a police station which is classed as a PUBLIC BUILDING. They don't control the airspace. You need to relax Ste, get a brew m8
No don't bother with the complaint. All it will do is delay the civil claim as that will have to wait for the complaint to finish. Go straight for the civil claim. Plus with a complaint nothing happens to the constable, and you don't get anything. But with a civil claim nothing happens to the constable, but you get something.
Refusing to give details is a secondary offence once arrested. If it were the law to provide ID upon request without any reason whatsoever we could deduce that we are in fact living in alternate reality and lost WW2.
I agree, but a lot of European countries being on the winning side of WW2 actually actually have rules to give details to the Police when asked, but only verbally: - name - date of birth - address (UK and USA is the special ones.)
@@Sun-Tzu-- We did - we lost an empire, all our money, and Germany got tons of money to rebuild from the US, while we were paying back our war bonds to them for the next 100 years.
@@eb4661 France are obsessed with ID cards, but the Netherlands hate them with a passion. It's name and address only in this country - never give police your date of birth.
@bob scott In Belgium you even need to ID with a card, when asked by Police. All of Scandinavia must answer verbally when asked by Police. France, Germany, Spain and Italy all have systems around the same. UK and USA is special. (Your references to contracts doesn’t make any sense - I’m talking about Police vs the public.)
Did he just say, " you've been arrested for failing to provide your details do you understand that ?". so that would be an unlawful arrest then, he kidnapped you and the entire time tried to use it to force you to give him your name, imagine if a member of the public kidnapped someone for not telling them their name, how many years do you think they would be serving, but when the police do it they get a promotion, rewarding criminal behaviour is not how you stop it.
THIS IS A DISGRACE AND ABUSE AND MISUSE OF POLICE AUTHORITY, sorry for shouting but it was disgusting, they should be severely reprimanded, and you need to get compensation for this abuse.
First thing once arrested, Never talk, everything you said in the car is and will be used against you. Once you get to custody ask for a duty solicitor, even if you don’t intend to use that solicitor or if you have your own solicitor they have to call them. All this is free whilst in custody. If like in the video he never read you your rights when arrested he has illegally detained you. Always remember the police are never going to work on your behalf or admit they are wrong. They DO NOT have your best interests in mind. Sue sue sue
If it were myself and I knew 100% not guilty of a crime then I would just remain silent no name no details except for as your suflggestion duty solicitor.
Very commendable how well you kept your restraint in the face of such ineptitude. You'd have thought he'd have at least made checks on his radio before diving in with both feet. Where was his common sense and discretion? Sidelined by his intransigence and his ego I suspect. Regards.
@@ReggiePhoto your more than welcome to fly , you know the legislation better than i do fifty minute video start at 20:16 to see evidence you may find useful ,
@@saxon12qa the Operator ID is on the drone and is registered to the owner, in case of an accident with another aircraft say. It does not have to belong to the person who is flying it. The rightful owner isn't necessarily the person flying it.
I feel your pain Same happened to me in Kent arrested for flying the mini 2 over medway police station section 43, 9 hours in cell released under investigation 😂 police need to learn the law they enforce
You have a good chance of a civil claim. 9 hours? That'll be a grand or two. HNK solicitors. But for this any no-win no-fee solicitor will happily take it on because the compo is big enough that it will make it worthwhile for them.
Its fascinating that the UK is the most photographed and spied on country and population in the world. Yet if the public want to record something it's an offence.. 🤔
That copper is fixated on flyer ID. For a drone 249g or under, whether it's a toy or not and has a camera, no flyer ID is required. That comes straight from the CAA.
@@noelward8047Are you suggesting ‘arrested on suspicion of…’ isn’t what happens? Even if a copper sees you commit an offence directly in front of them, it doesn’t necessarily mean you are guilty of it.
The very first sentence spoken during any caution is "you have the right to remain silent". That means you do not have to give any details. Other than asking for a solicitor, stay silent. Tell them you will give your details to the solicitor and will only provide them further on his/her advice. Don't even try and have a conversation with them. Remember, ANYTHING you say may be used against you!!!! The MAXIMUM they can hold any suspect without charge is 24 hours. If they intend to hold you any longer, they have to pursue permission from a prosecutor and need a good reason to do so. Beat them at their own game. Don't even accept any food or drink and the sh!t will hit the fan pretty quickly when they realise they are not going to get things to go the way they want!!!! Strange him saying you can't film in a police station custody area as it is a secure area, when we see them all the time on their "hero cop TV programmes", like interceptors or road wars!!! On release, before leaving the station, go to the front desk and make a subject access request for the custody suite CCTV and the officers bodycam if he was wearing one. Once outside, you should have taken your drone out and flew it over the station. Really rub some salt in their wounds!!!
Oh dear. Shameful ignorance. He's no rights to even ask your operators licence. He's no right for any checks or details. I hope your solicitor and his force drag him over the coals. Embarrassing and totally illegal detention.
hi reggie. ok so let me get this straight. the police now arrest first and then investigate later? when did this come in!? solicitors are going to love this. kind regards.
'This' came in years ago. Also, they now have 'released under investigation' as a weapon to cause maximum inconvenience. It could be weeks/months or even YEARS before they drop the non-existent investigation. Meanwhile, you are still marked on their system, and they hold onto anything they seized.. They do this so often now because they were told to stop abusing police bail - but at least bail had a time limit, RUI doesn't.
How does that man think he has the right without quoting the law to take you away from your family 😤 I hope you get compensation, and this man gets retrained 😉
This cop should be fired not re-trained. He will already have had de-escalation training and have all the relevant numbers and people to contact about drones so there is no excuse for his unlawful actions. You cannot re-train thugs, tyrants or self inflated ego's.
With all the 'unknown entities' entering this country the time will come when police will be in more danger than facing a man with a drone or a camera.
And then they will want the general publics support and sympathy! And after seeing what they did to people protesting during the coof scam I will never give them that support again. Tyrants.
I can't believe what I am watching. He has arrested you because you MIGHT have broken the law by flying a drone close to a building. Then proceeds to take you to the cells. Unbelievable!!
I'm so sorry about this Reg, you can sue him personally instead of the police if you want to, ask your solicitor. You MUST claim over this filthy behaviour, if you need funding please set up an appeal and I'll contribute. Thanks again for your great and so valuable work.
LOVLY CLAIM COMING YOUR WAY REGGIE... THIS CONSTABLE, AND CUSTODY SERGEANT, HAVE NOT GOT A CLUE ON DRONE LAWS, WHAT A IDIOT... ILLEGALLY ARRESTED AND DETAINED, UNBELIEVABLE... EXCELLENT VIDEO, STAY SAFE
Payday Reggie. Copper thinks he knows a bit of law and even when you Google it to show him he's too pig-headed to call someone to check. Then thinks he can just arrest someone for refusing to give details when they have committed no offence, simply because he can't be bothered to find out. Not being able to check the operator/flyer ID (you don't need the flyer ID if you are the operator) is absolute nonsense, there is no legislation requiring you to show it to a police officer. He should be checking the law. Edit: don't get hung up on giving your operator ID, it's not relevant. Not giving your details can only be a secondary offence, he has to be sure about what the primary offence is first and have reasonable suspicion that you were committing it. Having a suspicion that there might be an offence that you might be committing doesn't meet the requirements.
What he said he arrested you for doesn't exist in legislation, therefore this was an unlawful arrest, false imprisonment and breach of article 8 of your human rights. The constable is 100% incorrect about the drone which ONLY applies to +250g drones and you are not required to have a flyer ID, only operator ID on the drone and it's certainly NOT an offence to not have a flyer ID for a sub 250g drone. This constable should have checked before arresting you and not found out after the fact. NNY had a similar incident for which he is making a civil claim for I believe. You should do the same.
When is the ignorance in relation to the law by officers such as this going to be addressed by the hierarchy? Take him to the cleaners, have him stood in court and explain it to a judge, disgusting.
@@concernedindividual7056 Its not just as easy to say every force/agency is bad...It's down to individuals, who like on civi street, are the minority who ruin it for the rest of us because of the lime light they get...I'm all for pointing out the scumbags of the world but don't tar everyone with same brush because there are a lot more good moral upstanding human beings than what we see on social media. Keep it up Reggie bro💪🏻
I would never engage with them, what ever you say will be taken down in evidence all against you. You know your in the right law suit A.S.A.P An Audit like you gets to show the unlawful ways the police operate. Respect REGGIE ✊ 🤫
I got done once for a cheque that was forged only because the cop asked me if it was my signature, I stupidly said it looks like it yes but it's not me that signed it. That's all they needed, me saying it looks like my signature. It wasn't actually my signature or my cheque but I still got done on that single question.
Great video Reggie and I'm looking forward to seeing more videos from this story. Hard to believe in 2022 that details held on a database aren't easily accessible especially from the pair who approached you, surely a radio call to their comms would allow someone elsewhere to make those simple enquiries, or a telephone call to someone stationed inside the police station who could help to facilitate those enquiries. Hard to believe those aren't the simplest options, it certainly seems that the overriding intention was to massively inconvenience you just because you refused your name. The word tyrant certainly seems to fit from what we see so far.. Are you sure that you aren't in an episode of life on Mars and that it is really the early 70s, the clothes fit, the poor enquiries fit, mind you it's only the drone and the video that reminds us it is NOW 2022. Good luck Reggie. ✊
Why oh why it baffles me why people don't respond back when they say "We don't know don't know what if anything you're gonna do etc". When the response should be "Well officer, we don't go off what we don't know, but what we do at this present time". Anything else is just conjecture and paranoia/suspicion of that particular cop.
These fools actually believe they are above the law. The government should put a bill through parliament asap to make These fools pay out of their wages for lawsuits. They wouldn't be so keen to unlawfully arrest innocent people. These fools need sacking now!!!.
Small drones and model aircraft: below 250g, C0 or C1 class. The rule on minimum distances to people is different when flying small drones and model aircraft that are below 250g, or in C0 or C1 class. If you’re flying a drone or model aircraft that’s lighter than 250g or is C0 class, you can fly closer to people than 50m and you can fly over them. When you’re thinking about how close you can fly, remember, you must never put people in danger. Even small drones and model aircraft could injure people if you don’t fly them safely. If you’re flying a drone or model aircraft that’s between 250g and 500g, or is C1 class, you can fly closer to people than 50m, but you must not intentionally fly over them. This information was copied and pasted directly from the CAA website.
Reggie was unlawfully detained and arrested, he had committed no crimes whatsoever, whether that was a civil aviation offence (flying drone below 50m, which a pilot operating a 249g or below model aircraft/drone is permitted to do under CAA laws/Rules and Regulations), failing to personally ID (give his name and address) and failing to provide his Flight ID. Because Reggie had not committed a CAA offence, arresting police constable #390 had no reasonable grounds to base an investigation on, so the arrest was unreasonable, unjustified and unlawful. Reggie cannot be given summary only offence charges of failing to ID (CAA Flight ID and Personal) because he had not committed any offences to begin with, so these 2 alleged offences automatically become null and void. Arresting PC #390 failed in his duty (Dereliction of Duty) to do a prompt and thorough investigation to ascertain and confirm Reggie's Operators ID with CAA, to see if he was valid and lawfully allowed to operate and fly his drone, he assumed Reggie could not fly his drone under 50m but never properly checked CAA laws, rules and regulations first before arresting him.
Reggie As the caa rules state that the operator id needs to be on the main body of your drone that lots of flyers are putting it UNDERNEATH the detachable battery but still on the actual drone body purely to obscure it from the cops but at the sametime totally comply with the caa rules... Smart move i think..
AN OPEN INVITATION ISSUED BY POLICE TO ALL AUDITORS AND ESPECIALLY DRONE OPERATORS TO COME VISIT SOUTH YORKSHIRE POLICE STATION AND MALTBY POLICE STATION ANYTIME DAY OR NIGHT TO RECORD EVERYTHING THAT CAN BE SEEN, INCLUDING VEHICLES (police and private) BUILDINGS, YARDS AND ANY AND ALL PERSONAL COMING OR GOING, for the near future.
Hi Reggie, as far as I know you can only be accused of the offence of refusing your details when you have been properly charged with an actual offence other that refusing your details!, even then you can demand to be put before a magistrate who is the only one with the power to insist!. This one telling you that you are arrested on suspicion of an imaginary offence, if what he claims had any foundation he would have access to the information he needs, he does not have that access because no offence is committed!. He just got carried away!, this is an unlawful arrest and I hope you get full compensation, I might suggest that as and when they make you an offer that you decline it at first, don't settle for less than five times what they first offer. There are no exceptions to the official PACE rules. Cheers, Richard.
Are there unofficial PACE rules? 🙄😂 PACE is an Act of parliament, a statute. The Code Of Conduct for pace is guidance, with clout, for the police to follow in their line of duty. I haven't watched the full video yet but I'm guessing they didn't follow any policies, laws or guidance to do with law enforcement. The one with the pointy finger in the thumbnail looks like he was around pre PACE, like I was, "The Judges Rules" were the guidance pre 1986. (yes I know PACE is 1984 but it didn't come into force until 1986)
@@cypeman8037 Hi cype, thank you for such an interesting question!. To start with I would say that given the degrees of ignorance so demonstrated in these auditing videos there must be some sort of unwritten interpretation of the rules which serving officers discuss among themselves and more or less accept, I am sure this will include the assertion of powers to which they are not entitled, after all the point of joining in the first place for many of them is to be given authority that the rest of us do not have!. Very few people really understand the significant differences between 'power over' and 'power to'. There will also be the underlying issue of the type and style of training given, to do this work properly officers need to be shown how to do it the right way out there in the real world, not in a classroom or a briefing session!. All people find it very difficult to process new concepts properly when they are in a hurry to go and do something useful!. Cheers, Richard.
@Don't Shoot Section 50 doesn't apply here at all. There was no antisocial behaviour, although they certainly do abuse that section with monotous regularity
Honestly the UK is so far down the drain now. You can't do this, and you can't do that. No wonder everybody is miserable and depressed. Some people are still under the delusion that the UK is a democracy. It isn't. They have more freedoms in Saudi Arabia.
18:00 You only have to give details once arrested. And if after arrest you still don't give details then you can be charged with it. But you can't be arrested for not giving details. You can only be arrested for a crime. And at arrest, the constable should explain what law you've broken (doesn't have to be down to the section, but usually is) give their collar number and caution you.
The officer says you are arguing with him whilst he is driving and continues to speak to you that must be an offence and should be dealt with. Shocking.
@Don't Shoot Oh dear. Was the steering wheel not a clue ? (The person in the passenger seat was being very wise, and staying quiet). Now. Regarding your 'investigation' skills !?!
£3k to £5k considering he was detained for an hour in my opinion ..obviously more if taken the whole way to court ..I know someone who got £20k after being arrested for five hours
@Brian Mooney Solicitors are after making money for themselves and their client. If it is a no win no fee agreement they will take the easy option. For example, If the police offer £3500 and no more but the client wants more then it means going to court. If the client takes the lower offer the solicitor will claim his costs and all is well. If they go to court and the judge awards more then all is well and the solicitor gets his costs paid. If the judge awards less he will be aware of the previous higher offer and costs will not be awarded. The solicitor loses out and has nowhere to go for his money. This is my understanding as to how it works but I stand to be corrected. That is why solicitors have to be really sure that the damages awarded will be higher and why they insist that you take out an insurance policy to cover that eventuality.
@Brian Mooney You are probably correct but going to court is a risk that the solicitor will not be willing to take. As you say, an easy wedge of money for Reggie. If he was handcuffed he could also claim extra for assault and battery, and press criminal charges against the officer. www.npcc.police.uk/documents/FoI%20publication/Disclosure%20Logs/Uniformed%20Operations%20FOI/2013/003%2013%20Att%2015%20of%2015%20Guidance%20on%20the%20Use%20of%20Handcuffs.pdf
Details is like crack to a copper... In many cases they dont know why they want them, but they need them and they are not above telling lies, inventing laws and crimes to get them. This behavior will continue to happen until the become personally accountable for their actions and personally responsible for the settlements from their savings, salary, assets or pension fund.
I've only just seen this video as have had a long day and you were overly polite, jokey and civil with them and still they abused their powers. The guy who arrested you to get your details is a clown. If this is deemed to be a just act then anyone with any type of drone regardless of weight less than 249g or not is liable to be detained and hailed back to the station at whim. FFS this is like North Korea! I will be in Russia on Friday and no way will this happen there. What has happened to England? Reggie esculate this to a claim if you can
Kate Royston ... The problem is that these "payouts" come out of the public purse. The only way for these to be effective is if they came out of the police officers' pockets!
@@thepianoman1010 Totally agree,but by suing them,maybe, eventually, better training/knowledge of laws will be introduced.Instead of just arresting people on nothing charges!
He is gonna regret this unlawful action especially when his number becomes open to broadcast. What a silly silly policeman. But money in the bank for more reggie adventures ! Better claim for new walking boots aswell buddy.💯💪👀
Should have flown the drone over the police station that you come out of! Please file a complaint on the 2 PIGNORANT TYRANT COPS that arrested you for nothing! And the Sgt! Teach them a lesson! And sue them personally for your arrest!🌻💛🌻
he's a jack of all trades pity he isn't trained in the actual job he does, a little knowledge about anything is dangerous, thats why you have tradesmen, you wouldn't phone a plumber to rewire your house
"quote the law" For example, when driving a car Section 165 of RTA 1988 gives the police the authority to ask for your details, and it is an offence not to give them. So where is the equivalent part of the law for a drone licence? Answer. There isn't one. That's a complaint for a false arrest and the officer being ignorant of the law. And a compensation claim.
Police have the authority to ask for your details anytime. 164 and 165 driving licence and insurance, you don't have to speak your details, but have to produce the above.
@@spudhead1161 "Police have the authority to ask for your details anytime" Whut? No. Only when driving, or suspected of driving, or committing an offence in relation to the use of a motor vehicle. Read RTA 165 section a), b) and c). That is not "anytime".
@@peterb2272 If they believe you've committed an offence or crime, by law you give details, they can still ask for your details anytime, no obligation to give them.
With your disbelief at the situation & doing what you do. You must’ve known this could happen some day, that you’d run into a clueless Tyrant. But being unrestrained sitting behind them was odd to see, after watching US audits. In Aus you might not be cuffed, but an officer would be in the back with you.
Hi reggie. Great vids as always. Might be an idea to get in touch with news now Yorkshire about this matter, he's really clued up on drone legislation and would be able to point you in the right direction.
This copper is a Tyrant, discourtious, egotistic and in need of retraining. When they give you an out of court settlement, it should come out of his personal salary instead of the public purse? Police have no concerns about complaints against them and even when they're wrong, there's no real punishment? They investigate themselves?
![FORTNITE CLASSICS IS BACK! Fortnite Item Shop [November 15th, 2024] (Fortnite Chapter 5)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RbQURbeFwqs/mqdefault.jpg)
They managed to check my operators ID name on PNC at the road side and then wanted me to show ID to prove it matched myself as the flyer (which is doesn't need to by the way). They issued a producer at the roadside to make sure I did provide my name (very bad practice). You do not need a flyers ID for a 249g Drone, and as long as the Operator ID is displayed on the outside, then your following the law on that one. Line of sight, well if they have someone willing to make a statement or video evidence then that could be an offence but it didn't look a massive area from your footage and you certainly didn't go out of sight on the footage you published. So this makes very little sense to me. I think his Ego got the better of him and he couldn't stop until he had your details. This station is firmly on my list for when I return. Great video mate. ❤
Thanks mate, I would definitely love to go back as they're clearly back street tyrants. Respect mate 👊 ❤️🤟
@@ReggiePhoto that’s a date. 👌
@@ReggiePhoto please do a few audits with dj, I think it would be a right laugh especially if you take a wig for dj to wear too 🤣
P.s I love the name tattooed on your left wrist. It's not often I see my name on people/things ☺️
@@DJAUDITS ha ha as Zoe said below, if you go on one with Reggie, which would be brilliant, you will have to wear a wig🧝♂️😎
Can you help him getting this cop and his sgt in deep trouble, DJ? You know how that works by now.
Seargeant and Constable need sued for false arrest and more , disgraceful. Two old fools who don’t know the law
The problem is that these "payouts" come out of the public purse. The only way for these to be effective is if they came out of the police officers' pockets!
Sooner it comes out of the Muppets pocket the better. Policing will change rapidly and we will get more professional constables who work without ego. (edit cos I am a blind git!)
just like insurance always claim and ALWAYS sue these tax wasters
Then all of a sudden they become professional
Absolutely sickening that these tyrannical morons are not held personally responsible for this disgusting action
In the end the chief and crim commission will get pissex off paying out... Of the public money.. Well i hope so
Released without charge for an illegal arrest, and made to walk back 15 miles, they should at least return you to the place they kidnapped you from
The most criminal thing on this video would be the cost of the taxi
They have to take you back to where they arrested you from .
@@pauldevenport28320 True, This so called 'Officer' dares to rome from the law, so smack his arse and send him home.
@Brian Mooney So, theres no crime committed apart from a copper who is clearly demented, arrests and takes an innocent man 15 miles away, discovers he is wrong, then makes an innocent man walk back or hire a taxi at his expense, through the coppers incompetence ?
What would you expect to happen if it was a lone female ?
@Brian Mooney Then it must be correct if you said so, maybe you are just as ignorant of drone laws as the arresting copper who messed up.
And maybe Reggie can clear this up, did they give you a bus token ?
Omg, this copper is an absolute muppet. You absolutely tied him in knots and got him to admit he arrested you under no grounds or section.
Easiest claim....ever!
@Brian Mooney I assume you're being sarcastic as your own comment quite clearly states its one of the most unlawful arrests you've seen?
Strange comment to make. 🤔
@Brian Mooney you're actual comment on the comments thread if this video. Rounded off with "your lawyer is going to destroy them"
@Brian Mooney well that's funny mate, as it takes me to the same profile with the same 8 videos, so I'm gonna call bullsh1t mate. If you're nit going to be honest please don't reply.
Nothing worse.
patrick houston I think he must be schizophrenic?
@@patrickhouston2610 just a wind up pal. Somewhere in his mind he thinks he's funny or smart or something.
Idiots like this I leave them to it
He has even trolled people on his on comment 🙄.
Possibly bullied in school and now thinks this is the way to behave hiding behind a keyboard. Who knows
That Officer should have exercised his right to silence. He has incriminated himself with his own words. He admitted he has presumed you guilty without reasonable grounds, and he admitted that he would let you go if you gave your details, which means he was using the arrest to coerce you into giving your details.
Which is an assault!
@@Phil-Sands It is assault and battery, kidnap and false imprisonment. The cop ran his mouth and basically confessed on camera.
As I’ve said before on other videos, these days you are guilty until proven innocent! The Police are out of control.
And they wonder why they're hated so much, what an absolute joke. I'm quite certain this is an unlawful arrest. I do hope you take this further.
They don't care that they are hated, it fuels their egos.
Most definitely unlawful. Plod can NOT arrest simply to obtain details, they can only demand details AFTER an arrest for a specified offence.
Tyrants hate it when they're not being hated - cos they think it means they're not doing their job properly if they're not hated.
No doubt he spent the rest of the day in the canteen;
Telling everyone that he had captured a dangerous drone operative Haha
Pig deserves dragging down the road
No crime so unlawful arrest, I wonder how many times the PC arrests someone who has not committed a crime.
All the time unfortunately 🤭
Based on a sample size of one I am guessing the desk Sergeant thinks
'What has the muppet pulled someone for this time' ?
It's disgusting how they can just dump you miles from where you were. What would have happened if you didn't have the funds to get back to your car? When you sue them, make sure you include the time it took to get back to your vehicle and the cost incurred. Tyrants indeed.
In USA they have to return you to where they found you !
stupid cop cannot even demand your operators I'd ..this cop has unlawfully detained you and unlawfully arrested you🙃
And don't forget kidnapping him..
Get the f-----s sued, and claim for travelling expenses and whatever else you can do them for. Totally unlawful arrest and total f-----g incompetence. I'll chip in towards legal expenses and I'm sure many of your subscribers will too.
Its hard to tell what you're trying to say speaking with that much censorship. youtube wont remove ur comment for swearing. lol
"How am I supposed to get my hands on you?"
You are supposed to have a good grasp of the law you are enforcing, if you don't agree with it then petition to change it, not just arrest people first.
I hope for an update, court outcome and compensation amount! Well done for documenting this clown cop 🤡
I am so sad that this has happened to you again. What has this country become! Good luck with everything Reggie and thank you for your brilliant videos.
Become? A Nazi Police State!
“Officer what am I arrested for”
“Dunno we will think of something later”
Go for the compensation payout, Reggie. Don’t lie down and take it.
He needs to be fucking SACKED
Guy looks about 70, his time has passed.. retire or sack him.
I would go back to that police station and fly the drone after this so called "Arrest" lol just to spite em.
I need to go back you're right
Stop encouraging this guy
@@stevenhastings1942 He's done nothing wrong, flying a drone under 250 is 100% LEGAL even over a police station which is classed as a PUBLIC BUILDING.
They don't control the airspace.
You need to relax Ste, get a brew m8
I think that elderly officer has early onset dementia, it is affecting his reasoning .
@@xMandalorex you need to fart and let him out . Hes a muppet
Congratulations reg!!! I'm so happy for you and please keep us posted on the process and outcome of this lawsuit!!!
Reggie I hope you are putting in a complaint with these muppets , keep us informed of the outcome
Will do
No don't bother with the complaint. All it will do is delay the civil claim as that will have to wait for the complaint to finish. Go straight for the civil claim. Plus with a complaint nothing happens to the constable, and you don't get anything. But with a civil claim nothing happens to the constable, but you get something.
@@TheSadButMadLad can he put in a complaint after the civil claim?
@@Jimages_uk He can, but there is little point in doing so.
@@ReggiePhoto no absolutely not! Never! Pointless...listen to Sad and mad Lad. 100% spot on.
Refusing to give details is a secondary offence once arrested. If it were the law to provide ID upon request without any reason whatsoever we could deduce that we are in fact living in alternate reality and lost WW2.
I agree, but a lot of European countries being on the winning side of WW2 actually actually have rules to give details to the Police when asked, but only verbally:
- name
- date of birth
- address
(UK and USA is the special ones.)
It seems that's what they are being trained at the "farm"
@@Sun-Tzu-- We did - we lost an empire, all our money, and Germany got tons of money to rebuild from the US, while we were paying back our war bonds to them for the next 100 years.
@@eb4661 France are obsessed with ID cards, but the Netherlands hate them with a passion.
It's name and address only in this country - never give police your date of birth.
@bob scott In Belgium you even need to ID with a card, when asked by Police. All of Scandinavia must answer verbally when asked by Police. France, Germany, Spain and Italy all have systems around the same. UK and USA is special.
(Your references to contracts doesn’t make any sense - I’m talking about Police vs the public.)
Unlawful arrest Plain and simple and an abuse of power you were right all along his ignorance is no excuse another payout 😆 🤣
Did he just say, " you've been arrested for failing to provide your details do you understand that ?".
so that would be an unlawful arrest then, he kidnapped you and the entire time tried to use it to force you to give him your name, imagine if a member of the public kidnapped someone for not telling them their name, how many years do you think they would be serving, but when the police do it they get a promotion, rewarding criminal behaviour is not how you stop it.
Hence Couzens.
“I know your trying to be awkward” whilst illegally arresting you! Oh the irony lol xx
They always twist it to their own advantage. Also they also use the W.I.S. ( When It Suits ) law.
Never help them. Never contact them. Never talk to them. They are your enemy.
How you keep your cool is amazing 👏 love yah reggie smashing it as always
You can sue a person as an individual under Tort Law.
THIS IS A DISGRACE AND ABUSE AND MISUSE OF POLICE AUTHORITY, sorry for shouting but it was disgusting, they should be severely reprimanded, and you need to get compensation for this abuse.
First thing once arrested, Never talk, everything you said in the car is and will be used against you.
Once you get to custody ask for a duty solicitor, even if you don’t intend to use that solicitor or if you have your own solicitor they have to call them. All this is free whilst in custody.
If like in the video he never read you your rights when arrested he has illegally detained you.
Always remember the police are never going to work on your behalf or admit they are wrong. They DO NOT have your best interests in mind.
Sue sue sue
If it were myself and I knew 100% not guilty of a crime then I would just remain silent no name no details except for as your suflggestion duty solicitor.
Arrested before checking the legislation, what a total wanker😡
Very commendable how well you kept your restraint in the face of such ineptitude. You'd have thought he'd have at least made checks on his radio before diving in with both feet. Where was his common sense and discretion? Sidelined by his intransigence and his ego I suspect. Regards.
Does anyone in the world believe that cops have any common sense. A brain is needed for that.
Age thing from this Plod. Arrest first, make a crime fit later back at the station.
@@stuartbrown8259 He was looking for an excuse to get back to the station before all the doughnuts were gone Haha
What a fool.
@@noelward8047 There is that aspect also lol.
Operators ID is only needed if you crash the drone so this PC was abusing his authority (see DJ Audits) :)
Exactly I thought I was more than reasonable showing him that
@@ReggiePhoto he was a total oxygen thief.
Take it all the way.
He used his powers against his oath. Section 26 charge against him probably applys.
But supposing the drone was stolen how would the police check its rightful owner without giving details?
@@ReggiePhoto your more than welcome to fly , you know the legislation better than i do fifty minute video start at 20:16 to see evidence you may find useful ,
@@saxon12qa the Operator ID is on the drone and is registered to the owner, in case of an accident with another aircraft say. It does not have to belong to the person who is flying it. The rightful owner isn't necessarily the person flying it.
I feel your pain Same happened to me in Kent arrested for flying the mini 2 over medway police station section 43, 9 hours in cell released under investigation 😂 police need to learn the law they enforce
You have a good chance of a civil claim. 9 hours? That'll be a grand or two. HNK solicitors. But for this any no-win no-fee solicitor will happily take it on because the compo is big enough that it will make it worthwhile for them.
I would have put in a subject access request for the CCTV footage of your booking in for a fictitious offence before leaving there as proof..
Never talk to a police officer who can't be arsed to park his car, and get out of it.
Its fascinating that the UK is the most photographed and spied on country and population in the world. Yet if the public want to record something it's an offence.. 🤔
That copper is fixated on flyer ID. For a drone 249g or under, whether it's a toy or not and has a camera, no flyer ID is required. That comes straight from the CAA.
Exactly. Clearly ignorant of the law. But a complaint will help with that 😏
The 'I can't check your Flyer ID here' is also bullshit. A quick check on the CAA website with a smartphone was all it needed.
So, IS it legal to arrest somebody because a police constable SUSPECTS a crime might have been committed a crime?
1984 here we come.
How it it illegal if a cop suspects you've committed a crime? got to articulate a crime.
All arrests are made on suspicion on crime.
The courts decide guilt or innocence
That’s how all arrests work - the police aren’t judge and jury.
@@pup6728 Incorrect.
@@noelward8047Are you suggesting ‘arrested on suspicion of…’ isn’t what happens?
Even if a copper sees you commit an offence directly in front of them, it doesn’t necessarily mean you are guilty of it.
Take them to the cleaners, prick doesn't know the law, False arrest , unlawful detainment , kidnap, assault
The very first sentence spoken during any caution is "you have the right to remain silent". That means you do not have to give any details. Other than asking for a solicitor, stay silent. Tell them you will give your details to the solicitor and will only provide them further on his/her advice. Don't even try and have a conversation with them. Remember, ANYTHING you say may be used against you!!!! The MAXIMUM they can hold any suspect without charge is 24 hours. If they intend to hold you any longer, they have to pursue permission from a prosecutor and need a good reason to do so. Beat them at their own game. Don't even accept any food or drink and the sh!t will hit the fan pretty quickly when they realise they are not going to get things to go the way they want!!!!
Strange him saying you can't film in a police station custody area as it is a secure area, when we see them all the time on their "hero cop TV programmes", like interceptors or road wars!!!
On release, before leaving the station, go to the front desk and make a subject access request for the custody suite CCTV and the officers bodycam if he was wearing one.
Once outside, you should have taken your drone out and flew it over the station. Really rub some salt in their wounds!!!
Also demand a copy of the custody record
Oh dear. Shameful ignorance. He's no rights to even ask your operators licence. He's no right for any checks or details. I hope your solicitor and his force drag him over the coals. Embarrassing and totally illegal detention.
If THEY had to payout of their own pockets for compo, they would wind their necks in!
hi reggie. ok so let me get this straight. the police now arrest first and then investigate later?
when did this come in!?
solicitors are going to love this.
kind regards.
'This' came in years ago. Also, they now have 'released under investigation' as a weapon to cause maximum inconvenience. It could be weeks/months or even YEARS before they drop the non-existent investigation. Meanwhile, you are still marked on their system, and they hold onto anything they seized..
They do this so often now because they were told to stop abusing police bail - but at least bail had a time limit, RUI doesn't.
@@Renegade1127 many thanks.
How does that man think he has the right without quoting the law to take you away from your family 😤 I hope you get compensation, and this man gets retrained 😉
This cop should be fired not re-trained. He will already have had de-escalation training and have all the relevant numbers and people to contact about drones so there is no excuse for his unlawful actions. You cannot re-train thugs, tyrants or self inflated ego's.
his ego wont allow you to win......
i reckon hes a very sad man in real life... probably has a stroppy wife he doesnt answer back.
Great video Reggie hope you sue them well the pc @ the sgt should be sacked 👍👍👍
With all the 'unknown entities' entering this country the time will come when police will be in more danger than facing a man with a drone or a camera.
And then they will want the general publics support and sympathy! And after seeing what they did to people protesting during the coof scam I will never give them that support again. Tyrants.
I can't believe what I am watching. He has arrested you because you MIGHT have broken the law by flying a drone close to a building. Then proceeds to take you to the cells. Unbelievable!!
Future crimes
if the cops had to pay out themselves they would think twice about their actions. just clowns in a uniform. nice one Reggie get the compensation.
I'm so sorry about this Reg, you can sue him personally instead of the police if you want to, ask your solicitor.
You MUST claim over this filthy behaviour, if you need funding please set up an appeal and I'll contribute.
Thanks again for your great and so valuable work.
But.... he never does.
LOVLY CLAIM COMING YOUR WAY REGGIE... THIS CONSTABLE, AND CUSTODY SERGEANT, HAVE NOT GOT A CLUE ON DRONE LAWS, WHAT A IDIOT... ILLEGALLY ARRESTED AND DETAINED, UNBELIEVABLE... EXCELLENT VIDEO, STAY SAFE
Sue these tyrants please.
Payday Reggie.
Copper thinks he knows a bit of law and even when you Google it to show him he's too pig-headed to call someone to check. Then thinks he can just arrest someone for refusing to give details when they have committed no offence, simply because he can't be bothered to find out.
Not being able to check the operator/flyer ID (you don't need the flyer ID if you are the operator) is absolute nonsense, there is no legislation requiring you to show it to a police officer. He should be checking the law.
Edit: don't get hung up on giving your operator ID, it's not relevant. Not giving your details can only be a secondary offence, he has to be sure about what the primary offence is first and have reasonable suspicion that you were committing it. Having a suspicion that there might be an offence that you might be committing doesn't meet the requirements.
What he said he arrested you for doesn't exist in legislation, therefore this was an unlawful arrest, false imprisonment and breach of article 8 of your human rights. The constable is 100% incorrect about the drone which ONLY applies to +250g drones and you are not required to have a flyer ID, only operator ID on the drone and it's certainly NOT an offence to not have a flyer ID for a sub 250g drone. This constable should have checked before arresting you and not found out after the fact. NNY had a similar incident for which he is making a civil claim for I believe. You should do the same.
Very similar to the NNY arrest. Hopefully they both get a payout.
💯 mate he just wouldn't have none of it mate
@UCnY_T4xWN8_PZagrn5pR7qA oh you'll have lots of fun but definitely will get pulled by one of these numpties 🤣 how much did you get it for
@Brian Mooney No he was kidnapped, untill he was well on the way to a police station and the cop finally read his rights.
The absolute tyranny and obnoxiousness on display by this officer was disgusting.
When is the ignorance in relation to the law by officers such as this going to be addressed by the hierarchy? Take him to the cleaners, have him stood in court and explain it to a judge, disgusting.
It's not just the Met that that needs to be in special measures, every force is as bad.
@@concernedindividual7056 Its not just as easy to say every force/agency is bad...It's down to individuals, who like on civi street, are the minority who ruin it for the rest of us because of the lime light they get...I'm all for pointing out the scumbags of the world but don't tar everyone with same brush because there are a lot more good moral upstanding human beings than what we see on social media.
Keep it up Reggie bro💪🏻
@@weskercat8721 Those that do not point out such people are just as guilty.
The money comes out of the public purser , its about time they were made accountable
It was just a matter of time before that wig got you arrested 😂😂
I would never engage with them, what ever you say will be taken down in evidence all against you. You know your in the right law suit A.S.A.P An Audit like you gets to show the unlawful ways the police operate. Respect REGGIE ✊ 🤫
I got done once for a cheque that was forged only because the cop asked me if it was my signature, I stupidly said it looks like it yes but it's not me that signed it. That's all they needed, me saying it looks like my signature. It wasn't actually my signature or my cheque but I still got done on that single question.
Hit the nail on the head when you mentioned whos pocket the claim money is coming from.
Great video Reggie and I'm looking forward to seeing more videos from this story. Hard to believe in 2022 that details held on a database aren't easily accessible especially from the pair who approached you, surely a radio call to their comms would allow someone elsewhere to make those simple enquiries, or a telephone call to someone stationed inside the police station who could help to facilitate those enquiries. Hard to believe those aren't the simplest options, it certainly seems that the overriding intention was to massively inconvenience you just because you refused your name.
The word tyrant certainly seems to fit from what we see so far..
Are you sure that you aren't in an episode of life on Mars and that it is really the early 70s, the clothes fit, the poor enquiries fit, mind you it's only the drone and the video that reminds us it is NOW 2022.
Good luck Reggie. ✊
Why oh why it baffles me why people don't respond back when they say "We don't know don't know what if anything you're gonna do etc". When the response should be "Well officer, we don't go off what we don't know, but what we do at this present time". Anything else is just conjecture and paranoia/suspicion of that particular cop.
It's a very common tactic of making up a story simply to fit their own arguments and so they don't get their ego's hurt!
£5000 and disciplinary for the Police...
Get yourself a mini 3 with the payout you're going to get from these muppets 😂😂😂
These fools actually believe they are above the law. The government should put a bill through parliament asap to make These fools pay out of their wages for lawsuits. They wouldn't be so keen to unlawfully arrest innocent people. These fools need sacking now!!!.
Small drones and model aircraft: below 250g, C0 or C1 class.
The rule on minimum distances to people is different when flying small drones and model aircraft that are below 250g, or in C0 or C1 class.
If you’re flying a drone or model aircraft that’s lighter than 250g or is C0 class, you can fly closer to people than 50m and you can fly over them.
When you’re thinking about how close you can fly, remember, you must never put people in danger. Even small drones and model aircraft could injure people if you don’t fly them safely.
If you’re flying a drone or model aircraft that’s between 250g and 500g, or is C1 class, you can fly closer to people than 50m, but you must not intentionally fly over them.
This information was copied and pasted directly from the CAA website.
Reggie was unlawfully detained and arrested, he had committed no crimes whatsoever, whether that was a civil aviation offence (flying drone below 50m, which a pilot operating a 249g or below model aircraft/drone is permitted to do under CAA laws/Rules and Regulations), failing to personally ID (give his name and address) and failing to provide his Flight ID. Because Reggie had not committed a CAA offence, arresting police constable #390 had no reasonable grounds to base an investigation on, so the arrest was unreasonable, unjustified and unlawful. Reggie cannot be given summary only offence charges of failing to ID (CAA Flight ID and Personal) because he had not committed any offences to begin with, so these 2 alleged offences automatically become null and void. Arresting PC #390 failed in his duty (Dereliction of Duty) to do a prompt and thorough investigation to ascertain and confirm Reggie's Operators ID with CAA, to see if he was valid and lawfully allowed to operate and fly his drone, he assumed Reggie could not fly his drone under 50m but never properly checked CAA laws, rules and regulations first before arresting him.
Arrested for the offence of not helping the police charge you with a criminal offence that you never committed.
Jack of all trades master of none . He needs to hand in his badge and uniform.
"Jack of all trades"
I wouldn't trust him to make the tea.
Reggie
As the caa rules state that the operator id needs to be on the main body of your drone that lots of flyers are putting it UNDERNEATH the detachable battery but still on the actual drone body purely to obscure it from the cops but at the sametime totally comply with the caa rules...
Smart move i think..
You can put it anywhere it is accessible without needing tools. So that could be inside the battery compartment, for example.
The muppets in blue throwing their weight about again....see them in court reggie. Keep the content coming we love it.
Cop said he was “Jack of all trades” the second half of that saying is “ master of none !” and he proved that as well !
AN OPEN INVITATION ISSUED BY POLICE TO ALL AUDITORS AND ESPECIALLY DRONE OPERATORS TO COME VISIT SOUTH YORKSHIRE POLICE STATION AND MALTBY POLICE STATION ANYTIME DAY OR NIGHT TO RECORD EVERYTHING THAT CAN BE SEEN, INCLUDING VEHICLES (police and private) BUILDINGS, YARDS AND ANY AND ALL PERSONAL COMING OR GOING, for the near future.
Hi Reggie, as far as I know you can only be accused of the offence of refusing your details when you have been properly charged with an actual offence other that refusing your details!, even then you can demand to be put before a magistrate who is the only one with the power to insist!.
This one telling you that you are arrested on suspicion of an imaginary offence, if what he claims had any foundation he would have access to the information he needs, he does not have that access because no offence is committed!. He just got carried away!, this is an unlawful arrest and I hope you get full compensation, I might suggest that as and when they make you an offer that you decline it at first, don't settle for less than five times what they first offer. There are no exceptions to the official PACE rules.
Cheers, Richard.
Are there unofficial PACE rules? 🙄😂
PACE is an Act of parliament, a statute. The Code Of Conduct for pace is guidance, with clout, for the police to follow in their line of duty.
I haven't watched the full video yet but I'm guessing they didn't follow any policies, laws or guidance to do with law enforcement.
The one with the pointy finger in the thumbnail looks like he was around pre PACE, like I was, "The Judges Rules" were the guidance pre 1986. (yes I know PACE is 1984 but it didn't come into force until 1986)
@@cypeman8037 Hi cype, thank you for such an interesting question!. To start with I would say that given the degrees of ignorance so demonstrated in these auditing videos there must be some sort of unwritten interpretation of the rules which serving officers discuss among themselves and more or less accept, I am sure this will include the assertion of powers to which they are not entitled, after all the point of joining in the first place for many of them is to be given authority that the rest of us do not have!.
Very few people really understand the significant differences between 'power over' and 'power to'.
There will also be the underlying issue of the type and style of training given, to do this work properly officers need to be shown how to do it the right way out there in the real world, not in a classroom or a briefing session!.
All people find it very difficult to process new concepts properly when they are in a hurry to go and do something useful!.
Cheers, Richard.
..... with a lawfully arrest
Wrong, how do you get charged if they don't have your details? some get charged by post. He didn't have to give his details here.
@Don't Shoot Section 50 doesn't apply here at all. There was no antisocial behaviour, although they certainly do abuse that section with monotous regularity
Honestly the UK is so far down the drain now. You can't do this, and you can't do that. No wonder everybody is miserable and depressed. Some people are still under the delusion that the UK is a democracy. It isn't. They have more freedoms in Saudi Arabia.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Being a democracy isn't the key to having a free country.
Don’t let this go Reggie, please dont👍👍👍
Once a copper has made their mind up you can't reason with them...
18:00 You only have to give details once arrested. And if after arrest you still don't give details then you can be charged with it. But you can't be arrested for not giving details.
You can only be arrested for a crime. And at arrest, the constable should explain what law you've broken (doesn't have to be down to the section, but usually is) give their collar number and caution you.
The officer says you are arguing with him whilst he is driving and continues to speak to you that must be an offence and should be dealt with. Shocking.
@Don't Shoot Oh dear.
Was the steering wheel not a clue ?
(The person in the passenger seat was being very wise, and staying quiet).
Now. Regarding your 'investigation' skills !?!
A drone and a wig in a rucksack, quality:). Cheers Reggie 😊
I've always said if Police had to pay compensation out of their salary it would be a completely different story. 🤬
This has got to be a malicious arrest , just to piss you off surely .. Take it further Reggie
You don’t even need a flyers ID for class 0 drones..
At least a £3000 claim there Reggie. More if the detention was lengthy.
An hour
£3k to £5k considering he was detained for an hour in my opinion ..obviously more if taken the whole way to court ..I know someone who got £20k after being arrested for five hours
@@ReggiePhoto I just got to that park when your comment came up. lol. Try H&K solicitors. I would imagine that it is an easy win for them.
@Brian Mooney Solicitors are after making money for themselves and their client. If it is a no win no fee agreement they will take the easy option. For example, If the police offer £3500 and no more but the client wants more then it means going to court. If the client takes the lower offer the solicitor will claim his costs and all is well. If they go to court and the judge awards more then all is well and the solicitor gets his costs paid. If the judge awards less he will be aware of the previous higher offer and costs will not be awarded. The solicitor loses out and has nowhere to go for his money. This is my understanding as to how it works but I stand to be corrected. That is why solicitors have to be really sure that the damages awarded will be higher and why they insist that you take out an insurance policy to cover that eventuality.
@Brian Mooney You are probably correct but going to court is a risk that the solicitor will not be willing to take. As you say, an easy wedge of money for Reggie. If he was handcuffed he could also claim extra for assault and battery, and press criminal charges against the officer. www.npcc.police.uk/documents/FoI%20publication/Disclosure%20Logs/Uniformed%20Operations%20FOI/2013/003%2013%20Att%2015%20of%2015%20Guidance%20on%20the%20Use%20of%20Handcuffs.pdf
Details is like crack to a copper... In many cases they dont know why they want them, but they need them and they are not above telling lies, inventing laws and crimes to get them.
This behavior will continue to happen until the become personally accountable for their actions and personally responsible for the settlements from their savings, salary, assets or pension fund.
Imagine if all these false arrests were used for real crime instead....
I've only just seen this video as have had a long day and you were overly polite, jokey and civil with them and still they abused their powers. The guy who arrested you to get your details is a clown. If this is deemed to be a just act then anyone with any type of drone regardless of weight less than 249g or not is liable to be detained and hailed back to the station at whim. FFS this is like North Korea! I will be in Russia on Friday and no way will this happen there. What has happened to England? Reggie esculate this to a claim if you can
It's crazy the real Nazis are on the land Of Britania
Keep strong Reggie. Love you ! From a English man in Tasmania!
Just keep getting the payouts mate!
Kate Royston ... The problem is that these "payouts" come out of the public purse. The only way for these to be effective is if they came out of the police officers' pockets!
Sadly these doughnut plods don’t pay, its us, the damn tax payer that pays for their stupid tyranny
@@thepianoman1010 Totally agree,but by suing them,maybe, eventually, better training/knowledge of laws will be introduced.Instead of just arresting people on nothing charges!
He is gonna regret this unlawful action especially when his number becomes open to broadcast.
What a silly silly policeman.
But money in the bank for more reggie adventures !
Better claim for new walking boots aswell buddy.💯💪👀
No Reggie it’s arguing when you don’t agree with someone 🤣 nice one dude fight them in the courts 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
🤣🤣🤣
You have got the right to remain silent and him trying to obtain your details is infringing your rights
Should have flown the drone over the police station that you come out of! Please file a complaint on the 2 PIGNORANT TYRANT COPS that arrested you for nothing! And the Sgt! Teach them a lesson! And sue them personally for your arrest!🌻💛🌻
he's a jack of all trades pity he isn't trained in the actual job he does, a little knowledge about anything is dangerous, thats why you have tradesmen, you wouldn't phone a plumber to rewire your house
Jack of all trades, master of NONE
"quote the law"
For example, when driving a car Section 165 of RTA 1988 gives the police the authority to ask for your details, and it is an offence not to give them. So where is the equivalent part of the law for a drone licence?
Answer. There isn't one. That's a complaint for a false arrest and the officer being ignorant of the law. And a compensation claim.
Police have the authority to ask for your details anytime. 164 and 165 driving licence and insurance, you don't have to speak your details, but have to produce the above.
@@spudhead1161 "Police have the authority to ask for your details anytime" Whut? No. Only when driving, or suspected of driving, or committing an offence in relation to the use of a motor vehicle. Read RTA 165 section a), b) and c).
That is not "anytime".
@@peterb2272 Not suspected of driving. Police can ask anytime. Don't talk from your back door.
@@peterb2272 If they believe you've committed an offence or crime, by law you give details, they can still ask for your details anytime, no obligation to give them.
@@spudhead1161 "If they believe you've committed an offence or crime" =/= anytime.
Freedom is NOT a liberty.
Its a God given human right..
With your disbelief at the situation & doing what you do.
You must’ve known this could happen some day, that you’d run into a clueless Tyrant.
But being unrestrained sitting behind them was odd to see, after watching US audits.
In Aus you might not be cuffed, but an officer would be in the back with you.
Hi reggie. Great vids as always.
Might be an idea to get in touch with news now Yorkshire about this matter, he's really clued up on drone legislation and would be able to point you in the right direction.
This copper is a Tyrant, discourtious, egotistic and in need of retraining.
When they give you an out of court settlement, it should come out of his personal salary instead of the public purse?
Police have no concerns about complaints against them and even when they're wrong, there's no real punishment?
They investigate themselves?
As a wise man once said a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing silly policeman!
Listening to this is like Listening to an ABBA album. MONEY MONEY MONEY 😁👍👍👍
Absolutely breached your human rights. Only thing he wanted was your details to satisfy his ego.