How The Car Industry Stole Our Streets
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2021
- Sign up for Morning Brew for free today: bit.ly/mbadamsomething
Turns out we've been driving on McRoads this entire time.
Check out my Patreon tiers: / adamsomething
Images of Barcelona I've used:
unsplash.com/photos/X6o9QhsxkmM
unsplash.com/photos/hVhfqhDYciU
unsplash.com/photos/c8vMIaXR784
Thumbnail basis:
unsplash.com/photos/2-B9yMEh2mk
![How Bankrupt American Cities Stay Alive - Debt [ST04]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XfQUOHlAocY/mqdefault.jpg)
![How Bankrupt American Cities Stay Alive - Debt [ST04]](/img/tr.png)
![Would You Fall for It? [ST08]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n94-_yE4IeU/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks to Morning Brew for the well-written and concise newsletters, and of course for sponsoring today's video!
Sign up for the Morning Brew Newsletter here for free: bit.ly/mbadamsomething
I suppose more space for cars less human means less chance of viruses...
Also you know any car manufacturers that paid for all this
Hey Adam, could you also do a video on Nuclear Power plants?
Hello hope your doing well
I can‘t believe that i can just agree to all of your videos
crazy how prager u preaches that taking away cars is taking away our freedom when in reality giving us cars made us more distanced and isolated and than ever before
Just look up where Prager U get's their funding and a lot of their views will make sense.
very true, tho, I just want to mention the fact that on the countryside this is actually the case, if you don't have a car you can't get yourself anywhere
Edit: When I say countryside I mean the countryside. I'm not supportive of PragerU because I said that you need a car to get anywhere on the Swedish countryside
Don't start talking about OTHER places and saying that MOST of Europe has good bus and railway connections, I'm not talking about thoose I'm just dissapointed no one else is talking abou the countryside
@@gaffalstudios3617 yeah, but the traffic (where i live) is not that bad. but yeah, the nearest city could really use more spaces without cars (although during the pandemic an effort has been made to reclaim a lot of the central city square, and one road has been entirely closed for cars and now there are tables for the adjacent restaurants
PragerU would say the asteroid that’s going to impact earth is a soros-funded liberal hoax.
@@gaffalstudios3617 That's why public transportation and good bicycle infrastructure is as important in rural areas as in urban ones.
Even most people in relativly dense rural areas (i.e most of western Europe) could do fine in their daily lives without a car.
Adam, showing pictures of European roads: “These streets are awful!”
Me, an American: “You ain’t seen nothing yet, partner.”
As someone who spent nearly every summer in Prague, this is very true. Almost all of his pics of old city centers turn highways are of Prague, and in my opinion, Prague is one of the most walkable cities Ive ever been to, mainly due to its absolutely amazing public transportation system. But they should and could easily create more superblocks, especially in the center of the city.
The US is a joke in comparison. Many towns have no sidewalks at all. If you walk, there is a decent chance you could get pulled over by police.
@Akshay Sharma I was about to say that ! See the new scrappage policy ? The govt is incentivizing people to buy more cars and there's gonna be a long delay before we start freeing our cities.
@@davidwest6019 Excuse me, what? If there are no sidewalks, how are you suppoed to get from A to B without a car? Am I just an ignorant European or something?
@@Sina-dv1eg you aren't
@@Sina-dv1eg The only way in most places is by car. You aren't ignorant, it's just the way the US is.
"Why don't you kids go and play outside like we used to in the old days?"
It's not because of the technology and exciting things to do inside, it's because of the lack of public spaces and exciting things to do outside.
I hope you realize your parents didn't have playgrounds or exciting things to do lol, those are kind of recent, 90s+. And stuff like sports clubs etc. have been massively funded. There's so much more to do outside now then even when I was a kid. Technology plays a sinister role in this, it's too addictive
@@brotpros2306 yeah my mom is 60 and she said that they weren't allowed home from morning until dinner. The neighborhood would mostly use their imagination to play persistent games.
In those «good ol'days», kids rarely play: They used to go to work to help their poor families
@@loplopthebird1860 In the good old days, kids were monkes
@@debilman9065 In the good ol days, kids were cool velociraptors
I'd like to see more of these, but Americans would likely call it "an attack on our freedom" or "one step closer to communism."
Meanwhile after interacting with guys from USSR : atleast you have drinking water
Yeah thats already happening, there are actually many cities in the US that are trying to do things like this, or at least take steps towards it, and that is exactly the response from an unfortunate number of people
Diy took our jirbs. Saying no to cars is political suicide in Murica
At the risk of controversy, didn't the Soviet Union design it's cities with "superblocks", albeit with less . . . creative designs? Still, superblocks are much better than what we have now in the Western. Ideally, we could also build out public transit so that everyone is within a 7-10 minute walk and cars are unnecessary besides emergency services.
@@avirambhalla-levine1854 I was thinking the same thing. I live in a small town call Bath, PA. There's a railroad track next to my house that leads to Bethlehem. That line connects to a line that leads to Harrisburg in one direction and Newark / New York City in the other. If only someone would put a passenger train on those tracks, I could get to New York on foot.
"You, as a human being, are banned from using most public places unless you purchase a motor-vehicle. Let that sink in..."
next episode you as a human being are banned from buying anything because rent prices
And when you are allowed to share the road you're busy dodging death on wheels half the time.
I remember that when I was a child, a highway expansion project swallowed up a portion of my neighborhood... As human beings we are not just banned from most public places but, what remains for us is being actively and purposely chipped away.
Man, what does that sink need now?
@@browsingfloor62 those parts with no sidewalks are always the rockiest. I always feel like imma step wrong and stumble into the road.
Adam "So what is the solution? How do we fix this?"
Me: Oh boy trains it's gonna be trains
Adam: "One word"
Me: Choo choo motherfu-
Adam: "Superblocks!"
Me: ...You absolute magnificent bastard
This gives me factorio vibes, oh right yeah cityblocks..
european federation with superblocks and trains as way of transport. i mean it seems nice
Don't you mean 'Big Chungus Pods?'
I nearly spit out my coffee lmao
You had me at choo-choo
Take my like
It's sad that Adam's examples of how bad streets have become are 1000% better than what we have in the majority of America.
True. My town doesn't even have a safe sidewalk.
at this point the majority of america is out of the picture for serious proposals like these.
Yep. Seriously considering a move to a more liveable city whenever I have the money. Its miserable to have the worst sidewalks ever right next to roads that are always maintained and touched up and made wider every year. And more and more buildings go down and are turned into parking spaces.
“It’s a type of insanity that we all go used to over the years and never stopped to consider it’s implications”
Oh, so it’s like everything then
The best and worst thing about humans is that we can get used to pretty much anything.
You've just defined CULTURE
based
@@loplopthebird1860 culture and tradition is important
its implications not it's
The movie "Cars" by Jorge Ohwell is a very good dystopian sci-fi film about a world in which cars have completely taken over society to the point where humans become irrelevant. Humans literally cease to exist because of how much society has become centered around cars. Walking spaces no longer exist in such a dystopia.
Ok you mean that cartoon right? I thought you are being serious for a good minute😅
@@moh19931000 Lmao I did not catch on at all, until reading your comment 🤣 Makes “Jorge Ohwell” make more sense lol..
jorge ohwell sounds like the discount george orwell
Just a quick question: How do the cars reproduce?
@@RetroDragonfly They are manufactured in a factory
I love when you talk urbanization and socialization. We always talk about how people are socializing less because of the internet but never think about urban planning
"Non-places" by Marc Augé comes to mind.
@Baxi Tabaxi Wow, that is an astonishing level of indoctrination. Problems directly created by private interests in your world are caused by the one thing that can apply a brake on this. I guess it was the same private interest groups that actually planted the idea in your head in the first place.
So interesting no politician ever mentions this! It's all about facebook and nothing about environment.
Even in village streets with limited traffic, governments come up with bs reasons to take space from people and give it to cars. Halving side walks and cutting down trees to "make cars go slower" is not going to work.
@Baxi Tabaxi it's crazy that you think runaway car production is "leftist control"
While I’m a fanatic car guy and I would drive everywhere If I had the chance, I support this movement. The benefits in human psychology and well-being in such venture vastly outweigh any transportation problems that might arise. The streets actually belong to pedestrians.
Same I love driving, but as car guys we have to realise the downsides of the car.
I would argue to limit where the cars can be in the cities while public transportation, taxis and services to be allowed. Hence, streets become alot smaller.
@@bogdanpostole7251 Exactly! Public transportation is so underdeveloped in many places. If it was properly established, the idea is that you wouldn’t need your car...
Not always even mental. Ambulances and other emergency services can get stuck in traffic, leading to losing precious time.
I am a car guy too, and that's why I support the ideas in this video. Car enthusiasts like driving, which means driving where is fun to do so, like on mountain roads or in the countryside (or a racetrack if you can afford it). Never heard of a petrolhead saying "oh yes, I love being stuck in traffic changing from 1st to 2nd gear with my sporty, super heavy clutch pedal" 😂
funny how as a child i got excited when i learned about rockets and space, but now I'm excited over peaceful and quite public spaces
The solution always is high speed rails
Your name sounds like you're a mentat, you're probably right
@Fax nice
Yes, A High speed rail in the middle of every street :D
@@geography_czek5699 Yes we wouldn’t have to walk then
Kind of.reminds me of that Simpsons characters
While I still lived in Germany, I never thought about how a city could be without/less cars. When I moved to Amsterdam, I realized how great city with little traffic can be...it's a complete game changer for living quality
Utrecht is an even better example of that
@@LeLouisMax can't remember where I saw it on RUclips, but there is this video about or at least touching on the how Utrecht was supposed to be changed to be a car centered city in the 70s
I was in Berlin a month ago and can easily admit that your traffic isn't that bad. Your streets are empty compared to the Balkans, where a four-lane boulevard isn't enough for a minor district. We have other transportation methods such as buses, subway... but almost no one uses them. People here have inherited this stupid way of relating the car with freedom.
@@gh-yf4go it’s sad
@@gh-yf4go Can confirm that as a Bulgarian. There is that weird obsession with cars here. Studies showed that there are around 650 cars for every 1000 people, which is way higher than any other country in the EU. And oh boy, driving in the centre of the capital is hell, and god forbid you have to park somewhere. The only time when it is bearable is during holidays when everybody leaves the city (even the news said that during the easter holidays this year around 700, 000 cars left the city.).
I live in Merica and i love experiencing the freedom of inhaling exhaust fumes and being unable to walk to the store or anywhere. I love almost being hit by a car walking to class at my uni!!!!
Just a thought:
Close your eyes and think of 3 places in your home town that you like the most.
Chances are 3/3 or at least 2/3 will have zero or very little active or static traffic around you.
To be honest, places that have less traffic (and of course less pedestrians) here are usually smaller streets so they dont really feel safe
@@svp5thechad408 less trafic does noy mean less people.
All 3 are just My House...
Weirdly enough, I thought of my neighborhood. Maybe because, altough there's a lot of cars, most of them are just parked.
When the lockdown first hit, and there were maybe 2 cars on the road, I was taken aback at how much space there actually was that was inaccesible due to car traffic. It looked like something out of the Walking Dead, and I honestly miss it. It was so liberating seeing the 4-5 lanes of empty space that was just there.
I remember that -- hardly any cars in the street for weeks. It was a great time to be in an urban area, even though a lot of people fled to the suburbs (and later returned; a lot of them got COVID out in the suburbs).
If you have any reason to drive really late you can get the same experience.
YES! Cycling was so great at the beginning of Covid.
@@arnaudgarand7706, at the time it seemed like everyone was on a bicycle. There were more bikes in the street than there were cars, which was nice, because people usually ride bicycles on sidewalks, dodging pedestrians. (Riding bikes on the sidewalk is legal in my city because riding in the street here is insanely dangerous. They're just beginning to discover bike lanes.)
Agree, I cycled on the main duel carriageway road with many others, we were spread out and safe, leaving the pavements free and safe for families with children and dog walkers. It was weirdly wonderful, the peace and quiet was bliss, I heard the river, trees and birds singing for the first time ever in that area.
No matter how technologically advanced we get, deep inside we are still monke and we need big pillars to hide behind and safe monke forests.
RETURN!!!!!!!!!
Return to Simpler times primates
revolt against the modern world, kings
technology is no match for human biology
We are just Monkeys living in a Concrete Jungle
Amsterdam changed this.
It went from clogged with cars to a bike city.
And it’s freaking awesome. I lived there for a while and loved it.
To bad no one can afford to live there but the rich and people willing to live in a 300sqft commieblock
@@longshlong111 Same thing in NYC, rent for a bedroom-sized apartment can cost ~$3000 USD!
I would love to live in Amsterdam. Did you move from the US?
@@MainMite06 new York city, and cities in general are a overpriced scam
Eww cyclists
Adam something radicalizing me against cars in favor of walkable cities with good public transit has been such a pleasant surprise. Great for my character arc!
I've never even considered that roads take away social spaces, but now that I've seen this, it seems really messed up
Imagine if the majority of streets in your town or city were pedestrianised, it would be so nice! It would make walking to places nicer, it would make them less noisy, less polluted, safer, it would mean you could have outdoor dining and you could cycle everywhere. And the thing is once people realise that they can cycle and use public transport (and if those services are improved) the number of people on the road decreases naturally, so the remaining roads for cars aren't conjested
Time and time again we're proven that our traditional way of life is the best, everything changed when the fire nat- sorry, everything changed in the 20th century, we forgot how our ancestors lived and have been living for thousands of years. Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of good things that came with the industrial Revolution, especially in the field of medicine, but more destructive things were discovered too like nuclear weapons and fossil fuels addiction, which is now literally destroying the planet. There old architecture styles and urban plannings from different cultures didn't come out nowhere, they were gradually done to be suitable for their environment, but now we're being alienated from our environments, we no longer care because we don't see any changing results in the short term.
Climate grief is haunting.
@@appleslover architectural conservatism is one of the few I can get behind, old building look soo much better than skyscrapers xD
We just need to mix the old'ish style with new construction and isulation methods and we will get nice looking and functional cities
@@pieroguy in terms of morals new is somewhat better, in terms of infrastructure, it seems we lost the effectiveness of technology, instead just focused on advancements.
@@takeshikovach5165 yeah the thing is that with better technology even bad solutions can work somewhat wichh is why there is so many strage ideas like Elon's shit
In Morocco we are leaving our 1200 years old cities or as we call it "medina" with narrow streets to live in modern neighborhoods , the problem is that our ancestors understood that narrow streets are the only solution to find shade in strong sun light , but we ruined everything , now we have wide ugly sunny streets
I've been to Marrakesh in what feels like a century ago. I've been a kid of 5 or 6 back then. But I can remember how inhumanly hot it was on our way to the city and also in the city center - until we stepped into something I just remember as a labyrinth of stone and tapestries. I think it was a bazaar, but also with people living there and restaurants and everything in narrow, shadowy streets. And it was really cool, like almost chilly. And all the different smells and the lighting and overall atmosphere - it left a lasting impression on me.
I mean I'm sure your urbanists still understand that but their priorities have shifted. As the video says now instead of building with people in mind they do it for cars.
@@BombaJead true
Have been to Morocco a few times, the medina's are great, if we could get a 21st century implementation it would be so sweet.
Time and time again we're proven that our traditional way of life is the best, everything changed when the fire nat- sorry, everything changed in the 20th century, we forgot how our ancestors lived and have been living for thousands of years. Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of good things that came with the industrial Revolution, especially in the field of medicine, but more destructive things were discovered too like nuclear weapons and fossil fuels addiction, which is now literally destroying the planet. There old architecture styles and urban plannings from different cultures didn't come out nowhere, they were gradually done to be suitable for their environment, but now we're being alienated from our environments, we no longer care because we don't see any changing results in the short term.
Climate grief is haunting.
Finally realised why the red square looked so aesthetic, there's no roads.
Growing up in Sweden the commonness of "Jaywalking" laws is surprising to me. Even in Finland, it's illegal to cross a street except for pedestrian crossings, or against red light. While in Sweden, if a car hits a pedestrian in an urban street, it's generally the cars fault.
Superblocks are cool, but really only works in grid-layouts. But other solutions has also gone on in suburbs, where you usually can't drive through the small roads.
There are big misconceptions about this topic among Finns too, but crossing a street in Finland without using a pedestrian crossing isn’t explicitly illegal, the law is just rather confusing. The law does state that it requires pedestrians to use a crossing “if one is nearby”, however, what this means in practice is entirely subjective as there is no defined distance for it. Another thing the law requires is that whenever you perform a crossing without a crosswalk, it has to be performed with “the caution required by the distance and speed of the approaching vehicle or tram”, and without undue delay, so I guess in other words, when it seems safe and reasonable. No idea about the outcomes of court cases of drivers hitting pedestrians not using a crosswalk.
But yes, I don't like the fact that fines can potentially be given for crossing on red.
Truly dystopian, never even thought about it. Crazy how much space we lost to cars.
and just thinking about this is ONLY the car problem.. id like he makes more open minding videos talking about more of the actual moral/ethical crisis happening in many aspects in life that beenfit the rich as always :/
@@user-im9zp4yp9x bald assertion, dumb take
@@user-im9zp4yp9x some cars are needed, but when you live in a dense urban city a car shouldn’t be necessary
@@user-im9zp4yp9x no one is deciding who gets to have cars, I don’t care. All I’m advocating for is making public transport much better, and change car culture. I just want walkable and social cities. Obviously if need a car you should get one, I’m not going to stop you
@@user-im9zp4yp9x Don't use evil Amazon. Try again.
I thought you were going to say that the Solution was underground hyperloops.
Now talking for real, EV robotaxis Will really help with this matter. Throw away all the ice cars junk, and stop owning Cars. Just rent them as we do with movies and Netflix.
@@tomich20 Or, you know, build some actual public transport? EVs still need roads, which are expensive, inefficient, and reduce the quality of living for city residents. A light rail system can transport more people for cheaper than a fleet of robotaxis. I'd rather my tax dollars go towards something that works well and improves my standard of living.
@@areadenial2343 well, im sorry but if you are american its more likely your tax money is going to crazy projects like a underloop
Hahaha, good joke 😉
No, no PODS are the future! :D
Im glad we have "Fußgängerzonen" here in Germany. Zones were only pedestrians and bikes can go through. Every single car is forbidden there and only emergency services can drive through. Its really great to hang out with friends because you are totally safe from cars and can spread out on a relatively big area.
That sounds like a freaking DREAM. My favorite thing is to walk around and grab lunch with friends. I wish we had that here in the US
Wow! You Germans are so Dutch!
Anytime there is any proposal to exclude cars from someplace in the US people respond like the urban planners are sacrificing babies to Satan. About twenty years ago, Portland, Oregon--yes, Portland Oregon--wanted to build a street-level light rail line that would have excluded cars from a 1 km stretch of two low-traffic avenues in downtown, thus requiring cars to drive as much as 100m out of their way to the next low-traffic avenue.
Obviously this was unacceptable to anyone who thinks they are entitled to drive wherever they damn well please, so the planners ended up snaking the light rail back and forth between the two transit lanes and preserved a car traffic lane. This cost three times as much and took twice as long to build, but at least no motorists were inconvenienced by having to spend 15 seconds driving to the next avenue.
I love them too, but I think there's *way* too few in downtown areas here in Germany! Most cities don't have one where they should have one, and when they do, most of the time Fußgängerzonen have been built solely as a more comfortable space to do some expensive shopping in. Whenever I see a Fußgängerzone, in a central place in a large city, that actually feels like a place to socialize and spend non-consumerist time in, it's like I found a hidden gem.
@@gooblepls3985 Thats because most of those zones used to be the shopping street of the town - and it was considerd too dangerous to let cars in. It's a bit hen-egg but you got it the wrong way. Fußgängerzonen have not been build for shopping, they were created because there was a big crowd of people shopping.
That it today is also a shopping street (albeit with the same boring chains everywhere) or a solemn, empty place, is the result of urbanisation of shops, not the Fußgängerzone.
Living in Stuttgart i really felt this and can confirm: everything he said is true, center Stuttgart is hell, Degerloch is awesome in comparison but worse than all other cities in Germany. Generally can't recommend Stuttgart.
I drove through Stuttgart city centre once. Never again.
It's far more enjoyable to go by city train and subway. The shopping street Königsstraße is also a small window what a car-less Stuttgart could look like and it's crowded like hell for a reason.
I think size wise Leipzig and Stuttgart are comparable. But the difference in living quality is just completely astonishing
worst thing in Stuttgart are the schwäbisch people , and not the urban planning
Yeah it’s very strange when people blame the internet, but in actuality it’s that fact that urban planning prevents people from socializing. As a kid the ONLY reason me and neighborhood kids could play is because we had a bigass culdesac. If the culdesac wasn’t there, there would be no safe space for kids to play, other than in each others homes, which I doubt any parents wanted to deal with the messes afterwards.
There is another reason. Were I live, nearly every one has a garden of his own, but kids are never there. they are shipped off to sports, piano lessons, grandparents more often than they are home. Its very hard to get my child to play with anyone, because there is no one home. And on the few days they are actually there, they have to do all the homework that didnt get done when they were off to their activities. So no playing with local kids either on those days....
I grew up in 90s and 00s, before the Internet became mainstream, living in Russia (urban hell with no playgrounds). We would climb garages and kick a dirty football in parking lots. Older teens would be sitting around in the "pod'ezd" (communal area of blocks) smoking and drinking. Basically find a way to socialize. But now I don't see or hear any kids shouting, running, screaming around, they seem to be stuck inside their home. so the Internet definitely played a very sinister role in this anti-socialization
Aren't there schools and their playgrounds?
Aren't there parks?
@@loplopthebird1860 Its hard for a kid to get transportation to a park.
@@loplopthebird1860 yes there are. the next playground is a slide that bores 3 year olds (because it is very short) and has a ramp up to that slide that is too steep for 2 year olds so they get frustrated from falling on it. It also has 2 benches for the moms and nothing else. the second closest has 2 swings. Every garden around here has 3 times the number of playing stuff that any playground has. The next playgrounds that are interesting for children age 2 and above are 30 minutes by bike, but you dont get to know your neighbourhood kids there. And yes, the school has a playground....which gets closed off at about 3 pm, as a measure to prevent accidents and vandalism, same with the daycare. If his (i guess suburban) neighbourhood is/was any like ours, there is no place for kids to be kids and just meet up and play safely. Even our streets are unsafe, because people with big-ass cars sometimes speed through the backstreets without any thought. And just 250-500m away, there is a very busy road, that even I cannot cross safely at times.
The city of Montpellier has totally forbidden consumer cars from entering the inner city, replacing them with quiet trams instead. The result is an insane gain on room to expand café’s, restaurants, activities etc…
Aside from super block, the development of public transports and banning of cars is a huge help to make better cities for people
I want that when I am walking in nature. In certain places in Iceland.
@@Skoopyghost well, I remember Iceland to be calm and beautiful, but very dependent on the car to move around in the countryside
@@albanrobert3139 In Reykjavík. You have to own a car, but Icelanders protest like the French. It could be worse.
I still remember being told to "go out to play in the street"...
I now live in a cul-de-sac and my neighbors child can't play in the street because drivers will speed through to the parking garage at the end of the street.
You're such a blessing for RUclips. I've never even batted an eye on how cars "belong" on streets.
Lol funny how the algorithm works, i've been getting videos like this for years. Glad this idea is finally picking up steam.
Time and time again we're proven that our traditional way of life is the best, everything changed when the fire nat- sorry, everything changed in the 20th century, we forgot how our ancestors lived and have been living for thousands of years. Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of good things that came with the industrial Revolution, especially in the field of medicine, but more destructive things were discovered too like nuclear weapons and fossil fuels addiction, which is now literally destroying the planet. There old architecture styles and urban plannings from different cultures didn't come out nowhere, they were gradually done to be suitable for their environment, but now we're being alienated from our environments, we no longer care because we don't see any changing results in the short term.
Climate grief is haunting.
@Nat20 Damage I should change it to "hello, Zuko here"
@Nat20 Damage also, how tf is this related to my comment? What is the purpose of your comment? An argument? 1/10 incomplete
You cant even hang out on the sidewalk anymore in certain areas. Cops will ticket you for loitering.
In the US? Where is this happening? Tf
@@Tounguepunchfartbox at least in my state, that’s fairly common in front of any business… or public service building. You know. The services… for the public…
@@AabluedragonAH US is such a shitshow wtf
@@50733Blabla1337 always was
@@destdest9858 I mean I grew up with all the US propaganda films like Top gun and all the great man films rambo etc. so until like 18ish I thought it was paradise and now its lowkey hell to live in especially with my lifestyle
Growing up in Sicily I always enjoyed going to my Nonna's house. It was an ancient terrace street where the residents would sit and chat on the street on their kitchen chairs by the front door. It looks so strange as cars drive past, it never occurred to me this was culturally instilled before cars.
I live in Mumbai, India which has the worst traffic you could imagine. We never take our car in town cuz it's very bad, we just use the public transport which is very good the local trains connect almost anywhere we want to go, even if not you could get off at the closest station and pick up a bus. We only take the car sometimes if you want to buy like a lot of groceries or something.
"Imagine hearing that your dog got hit by a car, but upon running out to the street only finding a piece of well done steak"
Jeez, that is so dark, yet I can't stop laughing!
But it tasted like chicken
Gotta love those urban heat islands, they absorb so much heat that they literally alter the weather. I live in a city, and it's almost always raining- but rarely in the actual city, usually a few miles downwind of it.
I don't see how anyone can deny human influence on the planet when things like that are happening.
@@aidanharley243 same with not being able to see the stars
@@MaxwellJWhite lmao just go out to the desert
@@aidanharley243 no one said they dont, but try living without heat in the winter. And with the summer... destroy your house so it doesn't trap heat in it. Also city produce more heat due to the fact that we are warm blooded creatures. There naturally gonna be more heat in cities
@@Delt4_Cr4wfish Are you arguing that the body temperature of a city's inhabitants is a primary cause for a city's rise in temperature?
"You have to love pedestrians. Pedestrians make up the greater part of humanity. The best part, no less. Pedestrians created the world. It was they who built the cities, raised skyscrapers, laid sewage and water lines, paved the streets and lit them with electric lights. It was they who spread civilization throughout the world, invented movable type, thought up gunpowder, flung bridges across rivers, deciphered Egyptian hieroglyphs, introduced the safety razor, abolished the slave trade and established that soybeans can be used to prepare 114 tasty, nutritious dishes.
And when everything was ready, when our home planet had taken on a comparatively comfortable form, the drivers appeared.
We should note that the automobile was also invented by pedestrians. But drivers somehow instantly forgot about that. They started running over the peaceful, intelligent pedestrians. They took over the streets the pedestrians had created. The pavement doubled in width, the sidewalks narrowed to the size of a tobacco pouch, and pedestrians had to start pressing themselves against the walls of buildings in fear.
Pedestrians in the big city lead a martyr’s life. A kind of transportation ghetto has been created for them. They are only permitted to cross the streets at pedestrian crossings, that is, in precisely those places where traffic is the heaviest and where it is easiest to sever the hair by which a pedestrian’s life usually hangs."
Written in 1931
Hey mate, can I please have the source of this?
@@hatin494 "The Little Golden Calf" by Ilf and Petrov
I find it fascinating how over the pandemic, restaurants moving to outside seating has made streets much more pleasant places to be in.
Even i as a car enthusiast wholeheartedly agree. Trying to drive in cities is already slow annoying and finding good parking is a pain in the ass. These changes make getting around easier, living more enjoyable, and its better for the environment. Im on board.
Same, I'm not a car enthusiast, but I do use a car regularly go to the countryside where my parents live, because there is essentially no public transport. I tried to go to places in the city by car and it's almost always a hindrance unless I'm hauling furniture. S-Bahn and U-Bahn are much faster
Cars as a low-priority option of many, or leisure or utility vehicles are fine. It's not reasonable to get rid of every piece of motorway or parking spot, or really ban every car. I like the idea that the goal should be city efficiency and reducing traffic to only those who 'need to drive' or use a car for the occasion journey; by doing what has been proven to work study by study.
That’s why motorists in Europe envy our auto centric infrastructure. Finding parking is a hassle? *laughs in American* we never have a problem with that. There is parking at our destination over 95% of the time. Convenience at its finest.
@dog only ems really need cars in cities and ideally those vehicles would be around golf cart size
I love cars but think they belong on a race track, not in in cities
I leave a comment for the algorithm as usual.
I'm never disappointed with Adam Something's videos.
ENGAGEMENT
That Adams Something is really something
Yup
his quality of content is sublime! just starting to worry if i should start preparing for the climate catastrophe like those apocalypse preps xD
replying for the algorithm
dont get me wrong I like driving, but if youve ever been to a modern city which prioritises cars over pedestrians it is pretty depressing, haveing huge multiple lane roads and maby a grey polluted river running through. Ive been to Barcelona and superblocks seem like a good idea, but I dont think all cars should be banned fron citys just drasticly reduced and people to be discoraged from driveing in citys.
""just drasticly reduced and people to be discoraged from driveing in citys.""
Thats the entire point.
I'd like to see a small city designed with no personal cars, and everything in walking distance.
In suburbia, there are shopping that are designed as miniature cities..
I know I'm a year late, but try looking at a university campus :)
The real urban planning was the high speed rails we made along the way
I love the layers to this pun
funny how traffic laws started as "the poor people are starting to annoy our customers, so we ought to show them their place
Roman officials ran over people in the streets in chariots & horses, so this custom is as old as time. Of course, at that time, 99.9% had to walk. A bit different when in the US, nearly 70% of adults own a car.
This will take a major generational shift, and one caused by necessity not public demand (because, as shown, corporations make the laws). Say, gasoline/electricity prices 20x what they are today.
@@davidwest6019 dont worry, peak oil is comming soon
As a guy who does not own a car and is essentially trapped in the city I live in for the foreseeable future, this video hits me. I cannot access the other 75% of the city I live in without the use of an automobile because of the interstate running through it. It can take me 5 minutes to cross the busy road I have to cross to get to work/local markets. The crazy part is there are no crosswalks in this city except the newest parts which I cannot even get to without a vehicle anyways.
*Where do you live that crosswalks arent commonplace?*
My city,Tampa Florida, has made leaps and bounds to add manually operated crosswalk lights that stop the traffic on the stroads
@@MainMite06 Murfreesboro, Tennessee most of the main roads in the city are older and lack sidewalks and crosswalks. The other newer side of the city has them but I cant go over there anyways without a ride anyhow
@@Aatell764 that sucks bro
Hopefully people in your city eventually come around to the idea of a pedestrian centered city, or at least make some effort to reclaim the streets
Rural folks and suburbanites: How dare you build this small train line through our land, you don't get to decide what to do with our turf!
Also rural folk and suburbanites: bulldoze your public spaces, demolish your houses, rip up your train lines in your cities! We want free parking on your city and you are violating our freedoms if you say no!
*cough cough* the Netherlands is amazing for livable cities. Walking, Bicycles plus public transport are all you need if the infrastructure is there. If I need carry an object bigger than I or my bike can carry over the distance. I rent a vehicle fit for the job (which can be electric as it is ideal for short distances).
Disabled people are able to use this infrastructure almost as well as abled bodied with modified trikes and mopeds (I hope to be electric soon)
With racing history some how
Yeah definitely, but it wasnt until the late 1970's that people started protesting the many child deaths caused by motorvehicles. Eventually this resulted in an overhaul of Dutch car culture, in favour of encouraging bike usage through preferential urban design for them.
*Edit: grammar
@@TheRetardle the redesign of the major Dutch cities has been amazing, Amsterdam, and many old Dutch cities would suck if they didn't change
@@nwickstead Totally agree, I use an electric bike as part of my work daily and the accommodation for bikes (in Amsterdam and the Netherlands) is amazing. I think my job in another country would be comparatively more dangerous and slower given that the same space isn't provided for bikes and pedestrians.
@@TheRetardle I literally moved to NL from UK due to Brexit plus the thousand fold reduction in death from cycling between countries.
In Italy we have a lot of those "superblocks". They are called ZTL, "Zona a traffico limitato" or limited traffic zone. It's quite strange to hear this superblocks as a new invention since i lived with ZTL all my life and basically they serve the same purpose.
Honestly, i think you would love how Modena treated traffic. Also we are the greenest city in Italy!
Yeah this is the first time I hear the term ''superblock" aswell here in the rest of Spain we have plenty of cities with zonas de tráfico limitado and like you said not so new
@@Lululolalali indeed, maybe is not so common in other parts of Europe. Also love the fact that we found another case where Italian and Spanish sound similar ahahah
It always amazes me
It's definetely not a new concept, Barcelona is just a really good current example of a city going through that change in the current time, that can be used as reference for other cities wanting to implement that
@@AdrianVisan fair enough
I think giving it a flashy name like SuperBlocks helps make it more attractive to people, unlike "limited traffic zone" which sounds less appealing
Ever since i was a kid and looked at a street, i'd feel this itch to just stay there, not because i want to get hit by a car, but because there's such a big and open space that i will never be able to freely stand on. It's kinda like inverse claustrophobia
claustrophilia?
@@barrackobama2216 honestly i don't really know what i meant by that
I'm just now remembering that in high school (more than 10 years ago) we had to write our own version of "A Modest Proposal" and I wrote mine about completely banning cars. I was ahead of my time
I just twanted to comment that i had to do a similar assignment so i relate to your post.
You should become the prime minister/president of your country.
@@indetermite I'm American so it is definitely an uphill battle, but if it happens I will remember and respond to this RUclips comment
He's back, our light in the black, striding forth to do battle once more with our hydrocarbon-guzzling overlord.
there is god damn traffic on the sidewalks now because all the sapce is owned by cars
Another outrageous thing is how many of the old European (market) squares have been turned into parking lots. It's so much space, right in the middle of cities where it's most needed, that could be made into great public spaces. But we decided to give those places to cars instead.
The one thing that gives me hope is that the larger cities are giving these squares back to the people, but the smaller towns still have a very long way to go...
You should see some comparisons of Delft in the Netherlands, they turned it into a parking lot and then rebuilt it to be primarily for pedestrians.
I’m the 1930s, British children were arrested for playing in the street. And then people were like, “Well that’s actually terrible. Children should be able to play in the streets.” So they created play streets and basically gave the streets back to them. At least, according to Wikipedia that’s what happened.
As someone who’s never lived in a city this looks like a dystopia
The fact that I've never even thought about this, proves this videos point.
Well now its going to bother you constantly so I hope you enjoyed ignorance
It only proves you are narrow minded lol
Well that's because it's not much of an issue. You always have a choice to move away into the countryside. However because most people today don't want to live a minimalistic lifestyle like their ancestors (who had all the space to themselves) and want to chase career and money, they go to the big city, which results in ant-house skyscrapers and roads. Kind of unrelated, but I am left leaning but sometimes I hate how commies like Adam twist everything into some evil plan by the corporations, instead of realising people make their own choices... I like his videos but jeez he is so biased
@@brotpros2306 You keep using the word "commies" all throughout this comment section. I don't think that word means what you think it means, buddy
@@brotpros2306 Corporations (= the people whose interests (wealth, social status) are tied to the performance of corporations) have interests too. Sometimes those interests clash with the interests of normal people. When this happens, corporations (= the people whose interests (wealth, social status) are tied to the performance of corporations) act in their own interest rather than the interests of normal people. Power drives change, and corporations (= the people whose interests (wealth, social status) are tied to the performance of corporations) have power. Normal people with normal interests do not. This is why millions have died as a result of tabacco industry lobbying efforts, why cities are car-dominated, and why you think you're being reasonable when you call Adam a 'commie'. Who does opposing communism benefit exactly? You or multinational CEOs?
Jon Arbuckle's "1994" is a book everyone needs to read
Do you mean 1984?
I understood Arbuckels instead of Orvicle's.
Heard someone actually call it “1986” one time.
🤌🤌🤌
Jennifer lawrence's "2017", a true all time classic
Orville Redenbacher's Corn Farm explains it all
"The standard for most people in cities"... Victorian London would like a word. The truth is clean air and green areas being available to the public in cities was always a luxury that happened in spite of commercial interests, and was far from the standard. That being said, superblocks do sound like an excellent idea.
**Walled-Off Neighborhoods enter the chat-**
"Do i not exist?"
"a luxury that happened in spite of commercial interests". Yes, that's why you had them so often in communist countries and in others... not.
Green I talk about. (And Lenin monuments lol). Fresh air not so much because it was still the time where everyone used coal for heating or even cooking. Nobody, not even the richest, coudl evade that as long as they wanted to stay in the city.
@@steemlenn8797 🤣😂. Communism , you mean the ones who fill their lakes with radioactive material & pay 2USD to families who live there. Dude , ever heard about Kyshtym disaster ?
@@udbhavsingh8608 Have you ever heard of capitalism where people getting paid 2 USD per day while working in literally fumes of poison so that we can afford "Fast Fashion"?
Dude, have you ever heard of the people who have been convinced by company-paid spin doctors that asbestos is safe, that smoking is healthy and that climate change is a hoax?
The first three thigns have killed more people than any single desaster, and the third one will top that easily.
But at least we can enjoy teh freedom of car traffic jams, right?
Anyway, that was not teh topic. The topic was micro-areas, which - thanks to it's concentration on the workers - communism has build everywhere.
@@steemlenn8797 Yes , built everywhere , meanwhile every communist country , we help people & then take away basic press rights , cover up information. Oh , yeah smoking is healthy 🤣😂 , joke of the year. Every cigarette company in my country has text & images on evey box of cigarette stating that "SMOKING KILLS".
Me and my friends recently started using cycles. Hope our generation could understand the beneficial impact on our lifestyle, health and metal health. I feel lot better than sitting inside a cramped car
I'd say, where I live, there's about 40% sidewalk and 60% street.
It’s 90% street, 10% road in America’s capital.
@@reet7060 even the most walkable cities in the US are an embarrassment compared to the vast majority of cities in Europe (even with their own problems)
@@reet7060
99.9% street LOL
my city has a few pedestrian streets here and there, but some places dont even have sidewalks, you walk hugging the wall so the cars dont run you over
9:26 glad you mentioned that superblocks reduce loneliness.
We're currently in a loneliness epidemic, and loneliness is among the worst things for people's mental health. Chronic loneliness is as negative for your health as smoking or obesity is. And given that mental health disorders have skyrocketed in recent decades, it makes no sense why we aren't trying to combat it with simple but effective measures like closing some residential streets to limit through traffic and giving road space back to the public.
I am doubtful that blocking off city streets to make, essentially, *walled-off apartment complexes* is going to solve any loneliness problem:
In USA, malls, amusement parks, stadiums, and various shopping districts are where people congregate the most to for socialization.
But when covid hit:
*Everything in the world changed*
-more people are interested in working from home
-fewer people are going outside to shop for their various necessities and luxuries
-Public transports experienced and are still are witnessing reduced volumes
-Social media was no longer a luxurious past time and now a vital necessity
This the new normal, so be it..
@@MainMite06 I mean, the evidence is literally provided to you in the video that superblocks reduce loneliness. What you *think* doesn't contradict reality
Malls, amusement parks, stadiums, etc, do not promote socialization. They designate a tiny percentage of the total urban area to socialization (which you can only participate in if you have money to spend), while keeping the other 95% of a city blocked off. Additionally, people must inevitably drive in frustrating traffic anywhere between 10 minutes and 1 hour to these places (if you don't have a car or can't drive then tough shit I guess), which heavily cuts into people's available free time. And people have to walk to these places anyway, sometimes long distances, once they park.
Contrast this with superblocks and other pedestrianized areas where the socialization area is right outside people's homes, and nearly 100% of public space is for socialization. Shops where socialization happens are spread throughout these areas rather than condensed into one small space, meaning people have way more options to choose from, avoiding effective monopolies, and can find one within a short walk, giving people more free time. As a personal anecdote, a restaurant 2 blocks from my apartment is a shorter walk than the walk through the parking lot of the city mall, and the former is much more enjoyable for me. Economic activity is boosted in these areas too, because they are simply more efficient. A single pedestrianized street often holds just as many if not more shops than entire malls, plus housing and office space above them. Not hard to imagine how this is better at reducing loneliness than your idea of "socialization"
There's too many more benefits to pedestrianizing streets and negatives of car culture to list in a RUclips comment, especially since you're probably just going to dismiss everything I've written anyway.
@@MainMite06 It's telling that all of the socialising places you mention are businesses.
@@moosesandmeese969 it is rather oafish to ignore the fact that such attachment to technology is responsible for these problems
@@jgw9990 money money money
“Our streets will become frying pans”
*laughs in Australia*
I'm an avid car enthusiast, and I 100% wholeheartedly agree with Adam here. Cities and their streets should belong to people not cars. And as a matter of fact of that I have been lucky enough to experience a walkable city; where I live in Canada (Newfoundland & Labrador), during the later parts of the pandemic the City of St John's decided to make what they called a "Pedestrian Mall" in where they cut off all car traffic from an entire downtown street and made it all pedestrian friendly and walkable and after going down there to check it out I found it a very wonderful experience!
I remember watching old WW2 films of V day and a bunch of British people were PACKED in the street and I was thinking "Wouldn't this fuck up traffic?" Now I know the road was meant for that blob of people and NOT traffic.
In WW2 petrol was severely rationed for ordinary people and most working people lived close to their work, close enough to walk. Most men were at the front just finished fighting. Traffic as we know it today did not exist in most western European countries until the late 1950's.
I am 63 yrs old, I was luck enough to learn to drive when traffic was only a small problem and speeds were low. My father was even luckier, not needing to do a test and learning from his older brother as he went along in a matter of days. No need for tests or supervising drivers back then.
"All you had to do was build the damn train, CJ?"
Big Adam 202X or something...
I've been watching some skyscrapers videos, with nice helicopter shots, studio voice over, and uprising the "borders of what humankind can build".
Then recommendation brought me to "Dubai is a joke" video, and I watched a whole channel in a day.
I never changed my mind so fast about something, and environmental and social cause of skyscrapers overweight the "wow" factor.
On the other end this channel helped me to ensure myself, that my position about the cars was right!
They costly, time consuming to sustain and environmental disaster. So thanks for that!
Your videos have really opened my eyes when it comes to street usage. Thanks for that!
Teacher: you cant smell pictures
Adam: *shows picture of Prague´s main train station and magistrala*
I still remember the smell when I was there on vacation
Timestamp?
Just try not to remember the smell of the Parisian Metro
@@iainrickwood2623 1:19
Funny because living here I don't even remember what the smell is. Must be a case of living so long that you get used to it :D
In North America, there needs to be a significant change in zoning laws before concepts like superblocks can become a thing. Because every type of envionment is not zoned for mixed use, but single use for a specific type of purpose, there wouldn't be any benefit to a walkable superblock. However, once mixed residential and business areas are more prominent, superblocks could promote more walkability and would provide a lot of value for a community.
The benefit to a walkable superblock in a purely residential area would be a nicer environment to live in and hang out with friends in, and a walkable superblock in a purely working area would also be good for people on their breaks because they'd have a more pleasant environment to chill in and an easier time getting to a lunch place if they were getting a greggs or something, right?
You wouldn't put a business in a superblock anyway because people would bitch and moan about trucks idling and unloading goods at 4:30am in the morning.
@@joewilson3575 that are indeed some of the benefits. But allowing more mixed use zoning does allow for more people to not move around in moving tin cans since things like small shops/ supermarkets and cafe's are also somewhat intermixed with the surrounding blocks, creating a small centre of smal(ler) scale commercial activity where people naturally congregate and interact besides the purely neighbourhood plaza's.
It does not necessitate that every block has a shop/cafe (and the like) but that developping such smaller centres of activity is possible, which lowers the need for those big superstores with mega parking lots that everyone in a 10 mile radius has to drive to. You can think of it as fragmentation of commercial centers away from the outside of the city. Ofcourse, for these places to be viable for the owner, it is probably mosly useful for common ammenities like a supermarket, grocer, butcher etc. and possibly things like a hair dresser, florist and some place to eat out/ take-away.
@@ausaskar But you know it's a thing everywhere else? I mean I live in a condo and we have a small shop in the building and I never heard anybody complaining about the trucks. Very often I see these trucks during the day so it doesn't necessarily happens at 4:30 am.
@@zephyros256 Oh absolutely great idea, I love the idea of decentealising shops and bringing back village and town high streets, I just meant we should get to work on these carless blocks right and not wait for the zoning laws to change and the business and housing areas to all intermingle. Of course we'll want the mixed zoning, but don't need to wait on it.
We have a great german comedian (Anny Hartmann) who once said:
_"People are cursing on that there are everywhere E-Scooters. Did they took a look around at least once? There are everywhere CARS!"_
It's great to see, that there is a "Car-free-City"-Community.
I live in Germany and last Winter I rode my bike at midnight around town. All the traffic lights were off and no cars were around. So I could go where I want and how fast I want.
I was rushing to a friend who needed some help and I was faster that night with my bike, then at daytime with a car, when all the traffic lights where on.
And from that moment I realised, cars are the most stupid innercity transport for people. Bikes are faster and make you more healthy.
Bicycle not motorbike right?
Which holds absolutely no truth once you have hundreds of Bikes on the road which all have to abide to rules. You create the same old traffic stops, slow moving bikes and so on. Unless you want complete anarchy for those bike roads, which you experienced on the night you described.
@@acedia4454 bikes are smaller and can fit almost everywhere
@@acedia4454 No, thats not true. Just take a look at all the Bike Citys.
This fucking video hits me straight into my soul. It's like everything I have been silently grumbling and sometimes loudly bemoaning about for the last decade
Funny story: That intersection that you showed in Stuttgart was redesigned and rebuilt a couple years ago. It was even worse before, as the old traffic light system was so insanely stupid and complicated that this intersection alone was the cause of traffic jams throughout the city, while taking up even more space than it does now. Of course the redesign was financed only because it'd increase throughput, but at least I can cross the street there now once the pedestrian light turns green once every 20 minutes.
You can cross the street whenever there's no oncoming traffic, that green light stupidity is a very german thing that no one understands lol i've seen people literally in the middle of the night on a road with literally no cars refusing to cross the road just because it wasn't green.
That's when the german attitude towards norms and rules becomes ridiculous and makes the entire population seem stupid.
@@liquidsnake6879We do it because a child might see and copy us without knowing why you crossed the road. Worst case, you wait a minute or two
@@liquidsnake6879 That intersection is the B14 and B27 crossing. There is literally no time of day where there is no traffic there. It's one of the busiest roads of the city, and if you even attempt to walk across when the lights not green I guarantee you, you won't make it to the other side.
But thank you for your valuable input about your view of a nations attitude towards traffic regulations. I'll be sure to keep it in mind.
@@27suf Sure, but what exactly is the downside of that? Is the city surrounded by these intersections or is there only a few? I really don't recall having any issues as a pedestrian whatsoever in stuggi other than the city being huge and it taking forever to get places on foot though it pales in comparison to Berlin in that regard lol
But i mean most roads i crossed just fine, within a minute at most (and i was doing the german thing of waiting for green regardless of traffic as i was a foreigner and didn't want to disrespect your norms lol) and i don't understand why this is a problem exactly, furthermore the sidewalks were huge, you can literally fit 5 guys walking side by side in many of them something that in my native Portugal you wouldn't lol ESPECIALLY on the old sidewalks which are tiny.
There's always been roads and traffic, it's not like people were just hanging out in the middle of the roads in the middle ages since in the days of horses the roads were literally covered in dirt, grime and horse dung that would wreck your clothing, hardly somewhere you'd want to spend your time lol.
@@liquidsnake6879 When the hell were you in Stuttgart? 1955? We have the B10, 14, 27 running literally through the city center and the 295 running along as well. Sure you can walk everywhere if you're literally on the main shopping mile, but if you want to go to anything further than the Calwer or Eberhardstraße you literally have to cross either 6 lanes on one side or 10 on the other. Its a narrow corridor of 5 streets that are comfortable to walk on.
There are virtually no places in Stuttgart center where you can just sit down and relax, because it'll either be right next to a busy road, or you'll have to cross a busy road and go into some narrow road (with the exception of the few public parks there are, but there aren't many and they're always overcrowded). There's more parking space than public space in the city center, and that's really all you need to know about Stuttgart.
1:48 Big shoutout to Jon Arbuckle
Ah, cars. The most dangerous, inefficient, expensive and actively harmful form of transportation, directly killing our climate while also being directly responsible for many thousands of casualties every year. But they make money line go up so they're capital's favorite.
On a similiar note: In Germany in the 70s a couple of Sundays were designated as days were no regular traffic was allowed (firefighters, ambulances etc. excluded, of course), and I remember when learning about it that the pictures looked so fascinating because they seemed somewhat alien or like something from a movie. Besides there being fewer cars 50-40 years ago, it was also interesting to see how people just up and went to carry tables and chairs from their homes and gardens on the street to have essentially a garden party but on the streets.
Which of the Germanies?
@@jakobvanklinken Definitely in the FRG, western Germany, but it's possible that happened in the GDR, eastern Germany, too.
It might be important to note that this happened during the oil crisis iirc, and once things went back to normal these no-traffic sundays were abolished.
Tokyo has that for some neighbourhoods / blocks, aside from their street design basically working like "superblocks" (super narrow streets between larger roads, so nobody sane will cut through those). It's not a perfect city by any means but coupled with its efficient public transportation system it really gets some stuff right.
@@TheHeavyshadow I don't think Eastern Germany had anything like that. First of all there were less cars.
I am a citizen of Stuttgart and I am SO FUCKING GLAD you put my home town in here.
There is also a special name in Stuttgart for these more exclusive houses around the edges on the hills: "Halbhöhenlage". It is hard to translate but they are a clear distinction between the rich and the poorer people.
I was born here and live here all my life but as I grow older I get more and more frustrated by the ever-increasing traffic, SUV flood and the lack of proper biking lanes.
They built the fucking Interstate right through the city - you showed it in your video - which shows that they just don't give a fuck about a livable city.
*Rich people(Stuttgart auto industry) dont care about your feelings if you keep paying their income*
duhhh
"They built the fucking Interstate right through the city" YES! I have always considered this to be normal to have an interstate through a city because I live in Montreal and thats just how things are in North America. It's crazy to think how much of an impact a highway has when it cuts through a city!
@@MainMite06 I don't pay them anything because I don't even have a driver's license.
@@ts9749 yeah it is a very anachronistic way of urban planning.
@CatandBonez So, how will you afford the rent or mortgage on those houses if those *same wealthy people ran the jobs that you work for?*
I actually went to Barcelona on September 11th 2021 (cheap tickets from US that day, I wonder why); this video clearly outlines a huge aspect of my enjoyment for Barcelona as a city: People taking the streets!
It was a great introduction to a more person-centered infrastructure that I actually saw around Spain (Andalucia) as I travelled, and wish to see it implemented more consistently throughout the world. In stark contrast to Gibraltar, that is ENTIRELY car-centric infrastructure, and a generally unpleasant place to visit (and to live according to friends), I have found that places which either maintained pre-automobile city planning, or consequentially, failed to develop around car-centered structures are generally more sociable and less atomizing.
Great video! Love your work!
I'm being honest, we need some banning of traffic here in Stuttgart because it's insane how much cars are always on the road and clogging up the City
The most insane thing is, when anybody proposes to let streets be used by people and cyclists again, without the fear of fucking dying, motorists go insane. They think it's literally fascism or some shit
The American right to independence has been mistaken as the right to being toxic and ignorant.
Also the propaganda of the cold War backfiring.
@@wormwoodbecomedelphinus4131 it's not unique to USA. If you go to Twitter and read comments under posts of Barcelona's mayor, people are literally calling her extremely rude, Catalan words for "destroying their city". It's complete insanity.
@@wormwoodbecomedelphinus4131 I live in finland and people here are exaclty the same. They call anybody who proposes a bike lane being added somewhere literally a fascist, communist or whatever the buzzword of the week is. It's sheer insanity
Who said that?! Get outta here!... 🤣
If we are getting rid of cars, please get rid of cyclists too
Man I'm so glad I discovered Adam Something and Second Thought, despite the occasional doomerism with climate change, they give me hope that people are in fact thinking of ways on how to transition into a better living world.
I buy into the notion that realism leads to pessimism due to the state of our world. Those of us who can peek back behind the curtain see just how F*cked the system really is, and it kinda leads to a state of "well... shit.". The fact that Adam Something and Second Thought have a following does in fact lead to a glimmer of hope. But unless they quickly stop being seen as radical and go hella viral, I've lost hope for real change. The powers that be have done an excellent job of manipulating people. The blind argue that we're the sheep when they're ignorant to the fact that they've been fed purple drink since birth.
The belief that the world will end in your lifetime is a common coping mechanism for the fear of death. If the world is completely destroyed then you didn't miss anything. Ultimately this is just another form of climate change denial: before they denied the problem, now they deny the solution.
@@alexanderdvanbalderen9803 Yeah, for me that's what doomerism is at it's core. It's living in a reality so depressing, that doom is all you're left with. That's my definition of course, but it still stands. But part of the doom is that it feels like shit isn't being done, shit is being done but it's not radical, nor fast, nor substantial enough to make a difference. But it is something at the very least.
@@PlatinumAltaria There is some element of that, for me it's not that the world will end. I'm too deep in the sociological sauce to know that shit won't end fast, it's gonna be a relatively slow and depressing decline with tons of violence. It's just that knowing over 80% of us aren't going to have a decent future for complicated socioeconomic and climate change related reasons is just too depressing. Like none of us asked to be here, and not really can we escape this rather dismal future. Unless you're Jeff Bezos.
If you like the infrastructure/city-planning aspect of this channel, I'd suggest checking out Not Just Bikes, he makes really good videos on similar topics too.
I hate living in LA because these solutions will NEVER be implemented here. Wealth decides what happens in this city and your average citizen has zero say.
@@Mr-DNA_ LA fucking sucks haha, you're out of your mind.
So, I work for an inner ring suburb in the northeast USA and since I've begun watching your and 'Not Just for Bikes' channels I've become more aware and better able to articulate just how messed up the suburban design layout is. When I mentioned, casually, that the entire western side of this 'Town' (it's actually a large decentralized conglomeration of developments with a strictly zoned retail corridor) was being hugely underserved by retail opportunities (it's literally a three mile drive to get a quart of milk, no bike paths or public transportation and few sidewalks) you'd have thought I was advocating for raping babies. Might be a while before they get their heads wrapped around stuff like this. :) Peace.
Three miles to the nearest grocery store? lol
I've so far lived at 3 different places and there was always a grocer within like a 5 minute walking distance
maybe take your fellow city planners out for some shopping on bikes/foot in an area like this, i guess they'll love it
Not Just Bikes is an amazing youtube channel
Ask them if they're familiar with oppertunity cost and how much property tax revenue could be generated if a "free" parking lot was anything but a parking lot.
@@Knightmessenger Yeah, they have to get to it on their own. Coming from a 'city kid' it's just unappreciated and, to them, unwarranted criticism of their sacrosanct way of life and they turn right around and start going, "What about....(insert any urban issue you can think of)?" Peace.
8:26 rare Adam moment where 'Just build a damn train' isn't the solution
It's still a part of the solution
it is always the solution to any conceivable problem actually
@@pangiokuhli512 It's true. I was struggling with a project at work the other day, so on my break, I went out and built a light rail system. Came back in from break, and the project was much easier.
For the first time ever, I associated myself with the whole "Retrotopia" shit, when he talked about streets being social spaces
What is that?
@@DiogoBatista27 Retrotopia is the idea that the past was somehow a utopia, where everything was better. It's the basis of the conservative movement, but mostly just ahistorical bullshit
@@Anna-vz3jd at least we won’t have to deal with horse poop this time
@@Anna-vz3jd I tend to prefer a mixed perspective. Somethings were better then but many other things are better now. Our goal should be to study and recognize what worked from each period of time and implement the most effective measures in the most relevant areas.
@@ninjashot37 that's impossible, its not beneficial for corporations
And here I was, absolutely fascinated for a quarter of a second, by how the dominance of cars actually began 800 years ago.
I live in Madrid and this year we had a snow storm that completely stopped urban traffic for two or three days. You can't even imagine how quiet the city was, you could actually hear children laughing and people talking, and suddenly we had the whole streets for us to explore. I wish it stayed that way
America won’t do this en masse because of one reason: Lobby.
*Laughts in "my country hate companies so much than we can do this tipe of things without private interferience"*
Also the fact alot of the cities are built around this. So it will take Alot to change and be highly disruptionive. It would need to be a phased thing.
@@mrtrolly4184 Argentina
As a german i feel you
Time and time again we're proven that our traditional way of life is the best, everything changed when the fire nat- sorry, everything changed in the 20th century, we forgot how our ancestors lived and have been living for thousands of years. Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of good things that came with the industrial Revolution, especially in the field of medicine, but more destructive things were discovered too like nuclear weapons and fossil fuels addiction, which is now literally destroying the planet. There old architecture styles and urban plannings from different cultures didn't come out nowhere, they were gradually done to be suitable for their environment, but now we're being alienated from our environments, we no longer care because we don't see any changing results in the short term.
Climate grief is haunting.
In America: Walmart looking to make its' aisles driveable so you don't have to get off the car while buying diet coke.
I had a phone call yesterday from a company i applied for. I was walking down the highstreet of my village at the time. Its a fiarly quiet place but a lorry drove past me and i couldnt for the life of me hear what they were saying on the phone. Vehicles are ridiculously loud
Jon Arbuckle's _1994_ was a true classic lol
As someone who lives very close to barcelona in a city laid out similarly this fills me with pride
Can you tell a little bit about experiencing it first-hand?
Hey how is it going through Barcelona with the new superblock system? Does it create congestion on other part of the street?
The internet is the new street.
More depressing, less human, colder.
Same as with urban planning, social media sites can be built positively! It just takes a conscious evaluation of psychology lol.
And don't forget outright hostile.
Nah... even new pedestrian streets look the same...
@@aleksapetrovic6519 At least internet can't kill you... directly
(Come to Brazil, pls)
I like the subtle sound effects. nice addition 🙂 thanks for the great videos!
Wow, I personally have never thought about how the streets are actually build. You delivered some amazing points to take another perspective
Not to mention how many cities have laws against "loitering" 🙄
Because roads are surrounded by buildings, and buildings have people in them, and those people may be negatively affected by a large crowd standing outside their homes or businesses.
@@PlatinumAltaria I'm not a business owner but I feel like a large crowd outside my business would be ideal?
@@UptightGnome Generally you're gonna want people to come inside or go away.
@@PlatinumAltaria why, as a business owner, would you want people to go away?
@@Piterdeveirs333 If they aren't shopping, they're taking up space... do you come from another dimension?
I've been watching a lot of Not Just Bikes' videos on RUclips recently and he talks a lot about how city design in North America and the world could be improved. He focuses on Amsterdam and their solutions for a livable city that isn't all concrete and car driven. I think you might enjoy it! He has a different take on the solutions for car centric city design but I think both have merit and can be used depending on the place
Not just bikes is pog.
@@grassytramtracks he's pog.
Fr tho he should be the mayor of all NA cities and his critisicm (I think of it as critisicm) is really useful and opened my eyes to this sort of thing.
That's exactly the thing I'm ranting about since I moved to Budapest. Thanks for spreading the word, cheers!
Superblocks - what a great concept. Learned a lot from this video! Thanks for including the Barcelona example.