@4:00 - Sorry sir, but you’re mistaken. Weren’t no black men getting kicked out of their own darn house. The “Man in the House” rule was more so about single women on welfare who had men they weren’t married to being in their house. Also, the “Man in the House” rule ended in 1968. The issue is many B-Dubs left the black community to go live in section 8 areas where they could marry the state and survive without a husband. A bunch of black men foolishly push the “Man in the House” narrative because they can’t bring themselves to admit that those females were 304’s and or just didn’t want a husband. That’s what you’re doing now.
You said "Weren’t no black men getting kicked out of their own darn house. The “Man in the House” rule was more so about single women on welfare who had men they weren’t married to being in their house. Also, the “Man in the House” rule ended in 1968.". False and false. Much like segregation of schools ended in 1964, but in many places didn't end until a full decade later.. This was true of "No man in the house" rule of welfare. In fact I personally witness this still be implemented in the late 1980's in North Carolina. Married black women were "advised" if not outright told that there had to be no male presence. If someone were to bring up this being illegal, they switched and found ways to over present the income of the household (a form of red-lining), to make incentives for every man to be removed from the home. You have to double check your fact before you speak with such sweeping incorrect information.
@@dynastyfamily00it was for men that aren’t married to these women who were advised to get out. The government didn’t want to take care of a grown man living off of a woman’s government assistance . If black men married these women they could stay and that’s an actual fact. There were married couples of government assistance back in those days. It was a documentary that showed black men waiting outside the government assistance building waiting on the women to come out and the women would give the check to the men like they were providers. Y’all go back and learn the real history and not this fairytale of black women wanting to struggle by themselves. Hold these black men accountable and teach them to take on the patriarchal roles that men made for them.
@@dynastyfamily00 Instead of running off at the mouth…go look at the King vs Smith case. Which was based on a single mother seeing a man who wasn’t her husband. Also, once again, *the “Man in the House” rule ended in 1968.* So you can’t blame that on all of the single mothers in inner-city/urban section 8 areas were there’s very little black home ownership.
@@trashieaguillory7740 said "it was for men that aren’t married to these women". That is a lie, and I told you that in my comment. There is documented evidence to this. So I ask, why are you continuing to spread this lie? Also, in white neighborhoods "men not married" was never a qualification for their women to receive assistance. So again I ask..Why do you continue this lie?
@@dynastyfamily00 Also, out of wedlock birth rates is completely different than married men leaving the family. Even the Patrick Moynihan report in the 1960’s was about the “out of wedlock” birth rates. But yet here you simps are talking about men getting kicked out of houses that they own. 😂😂😂😂
I have 3 three daughters and they all want to be policewomen family court judges corrections officers to help the black community I only have them one day a week are you saying they won't be great officers of the court you said you called a female a sir that is why you had no customer service
![Chlöe - Shake (Feat. Jeremih) [Official Visualizer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aDs_1ufpfv8/mqdefault.jpg)
![MISSING: SLIM SHADY [Expanded Mourner’s Edition Trailer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xh8qgHrOO1g/mqdefault.jpg)
@4:00 - Sorry sir, but you’re mistaken. Weren’t no black men getting kicked out of their own darn house. The “Man in the House” rule was more so about single women on welfare who had men they weren’t married to being in their house. Also, the “Man in the House” rule ended in 1968.
The issue is many B-Dubs left the black community to go live in section 8 areas where they could marry the state and survive without a husband.
A bunch of black men foolishly push the “Man in the House” narrative because they can’t bring themselves to admit that those females were 304’s and or just didn’t want a husband. That’s what you’re doing now.
You said "Weren’t no black men getting kicked out of their own darn house. The “Man in the House” rule was more so about single women on welfare who had men they weren’t married to being in their house. Also, the “Man in the House” rule ended in 1968.".
False and false. Much like segregation of schools ended in 1964, but in many places didn't end until a full decade later.. This was true of "No man in the house" rule of welfare. In fact I personally witness this still be implemented in the late 1980's in North Carolina.
Married black women were "advised" if not outright told that there had to be no male presence. If someone were to bring up this being illegal, they switched and found ways to over present the income of the household (a form of red-lining), to make incentives for every man to be removed from the home.
You have to double check your fact before you speak with such sweeping incorrect information.
@@dynastyfamily00it was for men that aren’t married to these women who were advised to get out. The government didn’t want to take care of a grown man living off of a woman’s government assistance . If black men married these women they could stay and that’s an actual fact. There were married couples of government assistance back in those days. It was a documentary that showed black men waiting outside the government assistance building waiting on the women to come out and the women would give the check to the men like they were providers. Y’all go back and learn the real history and not this fairytale of black women wanting to struggle by themselves. Hold these black men accountable and teach them to take on the patriarchal roles that men made for them.
@@dynastyfamily00
Instead of running off at the mouth…go look at the King vs Smith case. Which was based on a single mother seeing a man who wasn’t her husband.
Also, once again, *the “Man in the House” rule ended in 1968.* So you can’t blame that on all of the single mothers in inner-city/urban section 8 areas were there’s very little black home ownership.
@@trashieaguillory7740 said "it was for men that aren’t married to these women".
That is a lie, and I told you that in my comment. There is documented evidence to this. So I ask, why are you continuing to spread this lie?
Also, in white neighborhoods "men not married" was never a qualification for their women to receive assistance. So again I ask..Why do you continue this lie?
@@dynastyfamily00
Also, out of wedlock birth rates is completely different than married men leaving the family. Even the Patrick Moynihan report in the 1960’s was about the “out of wedlock” birth rates. But yet here you simps are talking about men getting kicked out of houses that they own. 😂😂😂😂
I have 3 three daughters and they all want to be policewomen family court judges corrections officers to help the black community I only have them one day a week are you saying they won't be great officers of the court you said you called a female a sir that is why you had no customer service