If you really think about it, Disney's never really had their own ideas. A lot of their greatest movies have been adaptations of other peoples' work. Just some food for thought
@@michaelwinchester5003 Agreed, many were just their rights to make it into their version of a film but back then many did not know the source so just thought Disney came up with the entire idea and worlds.
That works tho because Disney gives them money to make movies which actually has increased chances of movies getting proper sequels.... honestly I'm all in...they wanna make their remakes let em..
@@CupidMilk I would live it because this was my favorite growing up but there changing too much. They are using the wrong breeds in the move, removing & changing songs.
Well, first of all, I don't recall that Disney has come up often with original new story in the first place. That's not what they are famous for to begin with. They are famous for bringing already existing stories in a most often romanticized version to the screen. Or did you think that any of their fairytales were original to begin with? Check out Hans Christian Anderson and the brothers Grimm and the stories they wrote, you will find a lot of the Disney princesses were around long before Walt. Artemis Fowl is going to be as original as most of their movies (based on a novel) but isn't a remake they are going to produce. But I do like the idea of Maleficent 2. I liked the first movie which was an interesting adaptation of Sleeping Beauty from the "villain" her point of view. This gives room to give this character an original story. Anyway, Sleeping Beauty was far from original either. Did you know that the earliest version is found in the narrative Perceforest, composed between 1330 and 1344?
Fluffbutt Alex in the lion king there’s been said that scars song won’t be in it so I think Disney is taking away songs that explain things like the actual hell cant you just leave the movie the same
Peter PEET What don’t they understand? None of Disney’s movies are original in anyway. They take existing stories and bring them to life through animation. Making live actions of stories told a thousand times isn’t original or creative. It’s a quick way to make money.
THIS right here is a prime example that Disney's remakes have gone too far. Stick to what you're good at, Disney. Animation! If it aint broke, don't fix it!
If the accompanying picture was accurate, then it looks like the siamese cats are going to be replaced by siams. Siams are basically what the siamese breed was before the much skinnier and more oriental feeling version took the title of "Siamese". So, basically they are replacing the current style siamese (from the cartoon) with the past style siamese (for the live action version).
They didn't say the Siamese cats wouldn't be in there. You need to listen better. They simply said the song would be changed because it was extremely stereotypical of Asians. That is the truth. As far as the male terrier goes , it's really not that serious. 🙄
@@Manx-lb1oc Thank you! It's really almost the same breed. They probably chose them because they're easier to train than actual Siamese cats. This person is acting like they're not even gonna be in there! 🙄
Support indie filmmakers on Kickstarter and Indiegogo campaigns. You will not get original content from Disney anytime soon. It’s time vote with our wallets
They are remaking their old films in order to keep the rights to the film. It expires after only so long, so to keep it ‘Disney’ still, they remake the movie, hence the rights are renewed
+Callie Quinn- I agree! While this is one of my favorite Disney movies, it should not be made into a live action. I mean, what's next? Mulan? Hercules? Pocahontas? The Little Mermaid?
Yoshifangirl I never watched the live action Cinderella cause I love the original Cinderella so much no remake or live action Cinderella will be as good
PrincessofEllabur I mean I guess I don’t really care about how many women were in the original movie lol .. Jock reminded me of my grandpa when I was kid so I guess that’s why it mattered to me.
For reals... I generally dislike all these new live action remakes and will always prefer the cartoony stuff, but it`s a special kind of unnecessary when you bring talking animals into live action stuff.
The slow moments bothered me the last time I watched. I mean The Graduate has some slow moments too but I expect to be engaged the entire time with Disney animation.
It's in Walts will he wanted all of the moves to be remade after so many years but he never wanted them to make all these changes. They need to keep everything the same.
Now hold up there cooper, at least they have started picking up some of those cliffhangers to a potential sequel they have been leaving around for the past few decades.
The American Shepherd there making a lot of money though. I wouldn’t be and you wouldnt be complaining if you were making the money they were. I also haven’t seen a bad remake yet so I’m giving this a chance.
Why can't Hollywood stick with putting out original content, instead of rehashing beloved classics? It's not only cheap, unimaginative and greedy; it's also VERY lazy
@@riotbreaker3506 I wouldn't really bring Netflix into this. There have been times where ITS content is better than Hollywood's; such as Stranger Things, The Dragon Prince and other shows
@@sadlobster1 Its not Hollywood its Disney. Walt made a thing where Disney moves have to be remade after so many years. That's why they are redoing all these Disney movies but let's be honest. If Walt knew they were changing this much of them. He would be turning over in his grave.
Ok, I enjoy live action remakes and all, but this is one of those movies that will lose ALL of its charm if it's not animated. The painted backgrounds, the smooth animation, the soothing voice acting and beautiful old timey music, all of that is what gives it its overall aesthetic. Something they will not be able to capture in the live action remake. PLEASE Disney, either make brand new original live action movies or (more preferably) stick to animated movies. Stop trying to fix things that aren't broken.
Cate Siebert I see what you mean. This is a valid argument against live-action remakes and I totally agree. I’ll miss the artistry in that sense. The racism, however, was a big problem for me, as I subscribe to the Asian philosophy. Considering that I’m a descendant (4th Gen mixed), that shouldn’t be a shock, just like I was offended when Peter Pan encounters the Native Americans (also 4th Gen mixed). Really, the insensitivity was old back then, so I’m glad they’re doing something about it.
Saemond's so your point is cartoons are always better regardless of bad plot and animation? Lol not really, some cartoons are terrible so they make them into live action instead. Avenger also got its own cartoon but no one cared about it until they made it into a live action movie.
Walt made it to where they have to be remade after so many years but I think he would be upset by how many changes are being made from the original ones.
i wish they didnt change these things.. and why change the gender.. it screws it up. like change the siamese cats to differ breed and change the song or something. but why gender change the chars..
Cause its 2019 and female dogs need the representation dont you see all those girl dogs not getting love. They are also forced to have several puppies without consent! How horrible is that!! And did you know female dogs get payed way less when used for tv shows or movies its 2019 let female dogs have rights !! (Im joking but im guessing its just a whole females need more roles thing??? )
It's probably cheaper or easier to find that breed as a female and more expensive to get the cat breed. Not only that but companies use animal castings (people bring their animals in to cast for characters) or they use animals from a shelter
@@janinedear-barlow MeToo is a witch hunt, and it's feminism that has allowed it to destroy so many lives and go on for this long. And don't even try and give me the ''oh but it got some real rapists in jail'' argument, because the abuse of it resulted in millions of people having their lives destroyed because it promised free money with no reprecautions. It's basically like nuking Europe and saying ''yes, but at least we got the ISIS members in it, so that makes it OK''. And yeah, I've been on the receiving end of it for no reason after helping a woman back home (last time I make that mistake), so I've experienced first hand what it was about.
Me: *sees the cockerspaniel in the icon* *clicks* Me: ... Me: Why isn't that my dog by now Me: ... Me: *continues watching and sees what's being changed/swapped out* Me: NO THANK YOU, BYE.
For Disney to be a certified reboot they have to eliminate at least 1 white male. LOL! New female character? No, so gender flip established ones out of fear it will expose nobody will like her and proving nobody wanted it.
SAM ELLIOT!?!?!? In a DISNEY movie? Now I’ve seen everything. But I can’t approve of the Siamese cats being cut out. That’s the same mistake as cutting the crows out of Dumbo.
People are too senstitive. It's why they said Pocahontas will likely never be made live action. You know my uncle dated a woman who forbade her son from watching Bob the Builder saying it taught him evil values. I thought she was just insane, but today I learn that she is not the onely one who can't tolerate stuff in movies. I mean there was that other woman who forced Pokemon to change Jynx's color, but I mean that's different from revoming characters from a movie for a song about cats being mischiveious.
Nah, forget the movie, I'd LOVE to one day have a pet Cocker Spaniel that looks exactly like Lady! And the dogs here are lookin' pretty dang accurate! Well...besides Tramp.
@@petalblossom6107 She's still a cocker spaniel tho American cocker spaniel and English cocker spaniel Lady is an American cocket spaniel(honestly the cuter of the 2)
Yay, another movie about talking animals. Like we don't have enough with "Benji", " El perro de la Casa Blanca", "Como perros y gatos", "Pet's secret life", "La razón de estar contigo", "Una chihuahua de Bervilly Hills", "Fluke", etc. etc.
@@Sugarskulladdict97 Writer's block is not an excuse when they are a giant corporation with access to countless writers. Odds are ONE of them has an idea. Disney is just cashing in on nostalgia because they know they can, and it's easier to redo movies.
Disney: *destroys the entire Club Penguin franchise because it wasnt "popular enough" A bunch of people: Hey Disney, that wasnt cool, I lost my job and I've been working really har- Also Disney: "Aye guys, dO YoU WaNT anOTheR LiVe aCtioN RemAKe???" Everyone: :/
orenji12341 I agree. As long as they don't force in PC rubbish or unnecessary add ons to the plots, I think it would give those movies the recognition they deserve. (Especially Treasure Planet, one of my favourites)
The black cauldron actually is one of the only movies in my opinion where it would make sense for a remake as it has plenty of room for improvement the 2nd time around, itd take some hardcore laziness to somehow manage to make it worse
Everyone always complaining about the live actions. If you don't like it, don't watch it. I personally am looking forward to all the live actions. The originals will always be treasured and never replaced. It's all a bit of fun.
@@allison3852 The streaming service will be called Disney plus and instead of saying plus I used the addition symbol. Also since it was I question I asked I used the question mark.
getting really tired of Disney doing live action/cgi (basically realistic) versions/remakes of their animated classics. i swear, its like they're saying 'screw cartoony animation, realism is the way to go' no Disney, NO! In my opinion, this is NOT Disney magic. Also, they are so out of ideas, they're just doing this to keep the studio going. but then again, let's face it, Disney never really had their own original ideas. All/most of their successful movies where just family friendly adaptations of stories by the Brothers Grimm (and maybe some others). this needs to stop i used to have a problem with studios going 3D with their animations, but at this point, i think i'd prefer they did that. at least it will still have have the cartoony feel
*To all those ppl saying "if you don't like it don't watch it":* If people stuck with that philosophy the original lion King and Snow White wouldn't have been so popular. They were expected to fail the second it was released and if people were like " oh I don't like it so I'm not going to watch" those movies wouldn't have been as influencial as they are now. It's not like ppl are just looking for things to hate. They were just disappointed, and some of them were very open minded about the film only to have their childhood crushed in return. Your comments are not realistic to real life. For example: why do ppl eat McDonalds even though they know it's bad? Because it's there! Nobody cares that this movie is probably going to be bad as well as the other remakes, they just want to leave their comment and review the movie, but ppl keep judging others based on opinions. Ppl are gonna watch the movie regardless of whether they like it or not, whether they spend money on it is a completely different story altogether. Ppl who pay money for movies are slightly biased, mostly bc money was invested into the movie, so they feel as though they must justify what they bought whether they realize it or not. A person who invests no money at all into a movie is less bias to it, bc they contributed nothing to the movie to see it.
@@maddalonefarms yep, I'm an Extra. I was lucky enough to work on this project 22 days in Savannah Georgia. The crew was fantastic and the catering was absolutely breathtaking. It was a surreal experience watching my hometown become apart of the Disney universe.
For real though Disney is getting on my nerves they are ruining the original classics that we all grew up with relying on nostalgia. I feel like after Moana they ran out of ideas
@@Moonstar79 Frozen 2 is the movie of the year. Of course Toy Story 4 is something as well. But seriously thank goodness they gave Frozen a sequel instead of a subpar TV show like they did Tangled.
Correction. Beauty and the beast was awesome! (At least in my experience.) Don’t hate on it please. I loved it. Lumiere was my favourite in particular so much so I painted him.(and Cogsworth) You can check him out on my most recent video if you are interested.
Not Pocahontas with today's sensibilities. Of course that could change in a few years I guess. Ten years ago books were lighter in tone and all of a sudden everyone wants their morally gray ickies to storm across the pages.
I don't quite understand why people are hating on the live actions so much I think they're quite enjoyable and to be honest they are catered to the new generation so that they are able to relish in these things without being bored but it also brings nostalgia for older generations. Y'all are just being picky unnecessary or not you have to admit that it is fun to see these old favourites re emerge as something different and wonderful!
"Hey waiter can I get a classic disney animated movie to go" Waiter: oooh sorry, we just ran out but we could offer you a live action remake Me: How does it taste Waiter: uncreatively with a pinch of dissapointing and "i did not need this" Me: No thank you I'll just go over to Sony Pictures They have a special going on called "Into the Spider-verse".
I guess cuz it's 2019 and adding more female characters is the thing to do nowadays to get praised. At least that's the only reason I can come up with... They didn't even make him an old lady to keep the grumpy charm though, so it just feels disingenuous all around.
@@SirCorn65 well of course he would, he would be stepping into the future. If you walked into your town 700 years into the future, you'd be amazed too.
Jesus can we please get a good original disney movie again. I'm so tired of these remakes and most of the original stuff is just is complete garbage made for a quick buck. There are so many people with amazing ideas for stories who just need a chance to get them out there, but instead we get remake after remake...
Officer Doge Possibly, but the other reason could be that Walt Disney apparently didn't like cats, which is probably why cats were villains (or at least not heroes) in the movies/cartoons when he was around.
I know...and I like your combi of Peg the dog and the nod to Peggy Lee, both voiced and name..the then First lady Mamie Eisenhower was to be the namesake, maybe it was sdropped because such a SEXY dog would scandalize Mamie. Anyway we gotr Peg(gy Lee) dog..
@@joshuarumsey5639 Yes, there are its support to be lady in the tramp made into a live move but they changed it to where almost every dogs a different breed, no No Siamese twins or song and extra. It's still Lady in the tramp so no it's not a new move just a remake with changes.
Disney's losing its heart, they keep bombarding us with tasteless live action "babamabooshka" and Pixar's obsession with long distance sequels makes it clear that they want to snuff DreamWorks at the Oscars again. Doing distributing rights for Fox is a mistake, I STILL consider Spies in Disguise NON-Disney.
"All new". In other words, "The same, but live action. Probably with some unnecessary stuff thrown in to trick people into thinking they saw something new".
You see..there are certain iconic masterpieces that will NEVER BE TOPPED and should be left alone; just the way they are, "Lady and the Tramp," is one of those masterpieces. Disney, do not DARE to touch this one, you ruined multiple movies by recreating them with ABOMINATIONS and aren't as potentially lively. It's not that they're BAD, it's just that they give off a different vibe of recreating the films and some things are changed now that made the movie as iconic.
Not sure if this is a good idea. I love this movie but sometimes things are better left alone
A bit late for that now! lol
Agree, Lady and The Tramp is my favorite because of the way it is *already*
Same feeling here!
Same feeling here too!
Like all the Disney movies they are remaking and have remade?
I think I'll just stick to the original...
Same
No argument here!😉
*Same*
Same
@Pika Poo the remake or the original?
Its official...Disney has no more ideas and relys on the other companies it purchases to keep it afloat.
If you really think about it, Disney's never really had their own ideas. A lot of their greatest movies have been adaptations of other peoples' work. Just some food for thought
@@michaelwinchester5003 Agreed, many were just their rights to make it into their version of a film but back then many did not know the source so just thought Disney came up with the entire idea and worlds.
Except Pixar.
That works tho because Disney gives them money to make movies which actually has increased chances of movies getting proper sequels.... honestly I'm all in...they wanna make their remakes let em..
Djizzle96 this is part of walt disneys wish before he died , wanting his legacy to continue long after he dies
Me seeing the thumbnail: are you serious?! Are you kidding me?!
*Taps video*
They're not kidding...
I HAVE LITERALLY SNAPPED SOMEONE BRING WALT BACK STOP THIS THIS IS MY CHILDHOOD THEYRE RUINING MY CHILDHOOD I CANT TAKE IT
@@CupidMilk I would live it because this was my favorite growing up but there changing too much. They are using the wrong breeds in the move, removing & changing songs.
😡😡😡😡
Alyssa Loveday I second that Alyssa they’re destroying everything
Okay, but why not make something new and original?
Also, what? They're leaving out the Siamese cat song??
Well, first of all, I don't recall that Disney has come up often with original new story in the first place. That's not what they are famous for to begin with. They are famous for bringing already existing stories in a most often romanticized version to the screen. Or did you think that any of their fairytales were original to begin with? Check out Hans Christian Anderson and the brothers Grimm and the stories they wrote, you will find a lot of the Disney princesses were around long before Walt. Artemis Fowl is going to be as original as most of their movies (based on a novel) but isn't a remake they are going to produce. But I do like the idea of Maleficent 2. I liked the first movie which was an interesting adaptation of Sleeping Beauty from the "villain" her point of view. This gives room to give this character an original story. Anyway, Sleeping Beauty was far from original either. Did you know that the earliest version is found in the narrative Perceforest, composed between 1330 and 1344?
Fluffbutt Alex in the lion king there’s been said that scars song won’t be in it so I think Disney is taking away songs that explain things like the actual hell cant you just leave the movie the same
@@Iv1309 You don't understand anything I guess
Peter PEET What don’t they understand? None of Disney’s movies are original in anyway. They take existing stories and bring them to life through animation. Making live actions of stories told a thousand times isn’t original or creative. It’s a quick way to make money.
@@Iv1309 that is true but they can find some other story to do or sum
THIS right here is a prime example that Disney's remakes have gone too far.
Stick to what you're good at, Disney. Animation! If it aint broke, don't fix it!
Yup I'm doubting Aladdin is going to bomb like Dumbo, but so far every review I've seen says its average at best.
I would go see a 2d animation. It's been so long....
Amen!
Lots of people would pay for this crap, sooooo... Show must go on! Here comes the moneey 🎶🎶
Disney tried live action in the 70's, with a string of mostly crappy movies.
No Siamese cats, no male terrier...no thank you.
Dustin Jacks ikr... I don’t think a female voice would match AT ALL
If the accompanying picture was accurate, then it looks like the siamese cats are going to be replaced by siams. Siams are basically what the siamese breed was before the much skinnier and more oriental feeling version took the title of "Siamese". So, basically they are replacing the current style siamese (from the cartoon) with the past style siamese (for the live action version).
They didn't say the Siamese cats wouldn't be in there. You need to listen better. They simply said the song would be changed because it was extremely stereotypical of Asians. That is the truth. As far as the male terrier goes , it's really not that serious. 🙄
@@Manx-lb1oc Thank you! It's really almost the same breed. They probably chose them because they're easier to train than actual Siamese cats. This person is acting like they're not even gonna be in there! 🙄
I love the Siamese cats and don't make the Scottish terrier a girl geeze it was fine as a grumpy older guy
It might be good... But it's sooo unnecessary...
Doggie it’s fun
Something for the kiddos
It’s lady and the tempo it’s necessary
It's more necessary than Aladdin and The Lion King
Doggie um it absolutely is necessary😂
If i'm gonna watch a live action Disney dog movie,i'd rather watch Homeward Bound or Underdog.
YES
Yes Please! I love Underdog and Homeward Bound
@@GabrielaTorres-do3cg
Homeward Bound is best. I even ended up having a cat that looks like Sassy.
I could watch homeward bound all day
UNDERDOG AHH I FORGOT THAT MOVIE EXISTED I USED TO LOVE IT def gonna do a rewatch! ☺
NO MORE REMAKES! WE NEED ORIGINAL CONTENT!!
SERIOUSLY THOUGH!
Support indie filmmakers on Kickstarter and Indiegogo campaigns. You will not get original content from Disney anytime soon. It’s time vote with our wallets
Disney never had original content to begin with. They take already existing tales, Legends, and actual stories (Pocahontas) and romanticizes them.
They are remaking their old films in order to keep the rights to the film. It expires after only so long, so to keep it ‘Disney’ still, they remake the movie, hence the rights are renewed
Musicalsfangirl Except it won’t. If they wanted to keep 100% licensing to their films they’d remake it word for word from the original.
I thought this was a joke.
I love Disney with all my heart but this is unnecessary
+Callie Quinn- I agree! While this is one of my favorite Disney movies, it should not be made into a live action. I mean, what's next? Mulan? Hercules? Pocahontas? The Little Mermaid?
@@seniorqueen08 Yes. A live action Mulan is coming out next year. And a live action Little Mermaid is in production too.
@@seniorqueen08 live action mulan is already coming next year
Yoshifangirl I never watched the live action Cinderella cause I love the original Cinderella so much no remake or live action Cinderella will be as good
IKR
Omg why would they change Jock :/ he was so cute
I'm sure about that it's just a rumor=)
Who knows? Maybe if all the fans come together and complain loud enough, then just maybe we'll get the same treatment Sonic is getting.
SegaDisneyUniverse Lol maybe
because outside of Lady and Peg and Lady's (female) owner and aunt-in law there are no other female characters?
PrincessofEllabur I mean I guess I don’t really care about how many women were in the original movie lol .. Jock reminded me of my grandpa when I was kid so I guess that’s why it mattered to me.
Not seeing it. Despite a few slow moments there is nothing wrong with the cartoon version of Lady and the Tramp.
Agreed! However I wouldn't mind seeing it just for Sam Elliot :=)
:=)
For reals... I generally dislike all these new live action remakes and will always prefer the cartoony stuff, but it`s a special kind of unnecessary when you bring talking animals into live action stuff.
The slow moments bothered me the last time I watched. I mean The Graduate has some slow moments too but I expect to be engaged the entire time with Disney animation.
No
No
And NO
We don't need a remake live action. The movie is perfect the way it is.
It's in Walts will he wanted all of the moves to be remade after so many years but he never wanted them to make all these changes. They need to keep everything the same.
I personally love animation. CGI is cool, but will never compare to the originals.
Adrian Graphics & Marketing I agree CGI looks cool- but when they remove the Siamese dudes and change Jock... to heck with them
@@rottweiler938 it is not comfermed wether rhe Siamese cats are replaced. However I do agree about jock
It might be fun but the animated characters are visually going to look more expressive no matter what. I don't get these live action remakes.
CGI ruins everything the old one is Art.
I agree 👏
Shitty art
Juan Rios, Jr this won’t be CGI tho?
Fish eislay
You get the point
You can tell Disney has no new ideas where they keep making real versions of their animated movies.
As well as sequels
Now hold up there cooper, at least they have started picking up some of those cliffhangers to a potential sequel they have been leaving around for the past few decades.
Facts
There are like 20 more coming up, too. 😒
The American Shepherd there making a lot of money though. I wouldn’t be and you wouldnt be complaining if you were making the money they were. I also haven’t seen a bad remake yet so I’m giving this a chance.
Why can't Hollywood stick with putting out original content, instead of rehashing beloved classics?
It's not only cheap, unimaginative and greedy; it's also VERY lazy
Hollywood? This is practically netflix.
@@riotbreaker3506 I wouldn't really bring Netflix into this. There have been times where ITS content is better than Hollywood's; such as Stranger Things, The Dragon Prince and other shows
@@sadlobster1 but it is, it's Disney's Netflix, not Hollywood.
@@debatable98 I still prefer original content over rehashes
@@sadlobster1 Its not Hollywood its Disney. Walt made a thing where Disney moves have to be remade after so many years. That's why they are redoing all these Disney movies but let's be honest. If Walt knew they were changing this much of them. He would be turning over in his grave.
*“This movie brings back so many memories”*
Why can’t you just rewatch the original?
I dunno how I feel about it yet or if I like it especially with so many changes being made
Ok Disney is DEFINITELY out of ideas now.
Guys, make an Italian movie in Venice.
Ok, I enjoy live action remakes and all, but this is one of those movies that will lose ALL of its charm if it's not animated.
The painted backgrounds, the smooth animation, the soothing voice acting and beautiful old timey music, all of that is what gives it its overall aesthetic. Something they will not be able to capture in the live action remake.
PLEASE Disney, either make brand new original live action movies or (more preferably) stick to animated movies. Stop trying to fix things that aren't broken.
Couldn’t say it better myself^^
Cate Siebert I see what you mean. This is a valid argument against live-action remakes and I totally agree. I’ll miss the artistry in that sense. The racism, however, was a big problem for me, as I subscribe to the Asian philosophy. Considering that I’m a descendant (4th Gen mixed), that shouldn’t be a shock, just like I was offended when Peter Pan encounters the Native Americans (also 4th Gen mixed). Really, the insensitivity was old back then, so I’m glad they’re doing something about it.
1. This is unnecessary.
2. You cant replace cartoons.
3. Leave old cartoons as it is.
4. Stop making remakes ofold cartoons.
5. im not too surprised.
Avenger is a success for a live action movie tho
If u dont like it then dont watch it
Saemond's so your point is cartoons are always better regardless of bad plot and animation? Lol not really, some cartoons are terrible so they make them into live action instead. Avenger also got its own cartoon but no one cared about it until they made it into a live action movie.
Walt made it to where they have to be remade after so many years but I think he would be upset by how many changes are being made from the original ones.
I can tell you this; I ain't excited about this remake at all.
I was, until they made all these changes
Me either.
I can tell that you are. since you clicked on the video
i wish they didnt change these things.. and why change the gender.. it screws it up. like change the siamese cats to differ breed and change the song or something. but why gender change the chars..
Cause its 2019 and female dogs need the representation dont you see all those girl dogs not getting love. They are also forced to have several puppies without consent! How horrible is that!! And did you know female dogs get payed way less when used for tv shows or movies its 2019 let female dogs have rights !! (Im joking but im guessing its just a whole females need more roles thing??? )
It's probably cheaper or easier to find that breed as a female and more expensive to get the cat breed. Not only that but companies use animal castings (people bring their animals in to cast for characters) or they use animals from a shelter
Progressiveness xd
I mean the only gender change that has worked so far is Kaa as Scarlet Johansson. That one worked really well imo
In what universe is it a good idea to change the character Jacque into a girl? That's a little messed up.
The feminist MeToo bullshit era. It will go away eventually but we’ll just have to power through it for now.
@@alexman378 you do know metoo is about rape not feminism
@Sailor Sedna
Hey Sailor how you been?
@@janinedear-barlow MeToo is a witch hunt, and it's feminism that has allowed it to destroy so many lives and go on for this long. And don't even try and give me the ''oh but it got some real rapists in jail'' argument, because the abuse of it resulted in millions of people having their lives destroyed because it promised free money with no reprecautions. It's basically like nuking Europe and saying ''yes, but at least we got the ISIS members in it, so that makes it OK''. And yeah, I've been on the receiving end of it for no reason after helping a woman back home (last time I make that mistake), so I've experienced first hand what it was about.
@@alexman378
Oh wow. That's awful that a woman did that to you.
The "Bone Song" and Jock calling Trusty a "great loony" when Trusty referred to the pound were his best lines!
Me: *sees the cockerspaniel in the icon* *clicks*
Me: ...
Me: Why isn't that my dog by now
Me: ...
Me: *continues watching and sees what's being changed/swapped out*
Me: NO THANK YOU, BYE.
I was thinking the same thing!😂
I’m mad about jock. I agree with what your saying about him being the old man.
BayonettaxXxDante gender doesn’t matter
For Disney to be a certified reboot they have to eliminate at least 1 white male. LOL! New female character? No, so gender flip established ones out of fear it will expose nobody will like her and proving nobody wanted it.
Xandra Nicholai I’m a woman and I’m saying it does.
YOU’RE*
SAM ELLIOT!?!?!? In a DISNEY movie? Now I’ve seen everything. But I can’t approve of the Siamese cats being cut out. That’s the same mistake as cutting the crows out of Dumbo.
Sam Elliot will be great ha
gameoholic1994- Not to mention the mouse from the original dumbo wasn't in the remade version of dumbo.
Potato Man Actually, I thought he was, but as a cameo as one of the daughter’s pets.
Potato Man His name was Timothy.
People are too senstitive. It's why they said Pocahontas will likely never be made live action. You know my uncle dated a woman who forbade her son from watching Bob the Builder saying it taught him evil values. I thought she was just insane, but today I learn that she is not the onely one who can't tolerate stuff in movies. I mean there was that other woman who forced Pokemon to change Jynx's color, but I mean that's different from revoming characters from a movie for a song about cats being mischiveious.
I'm like are you kidding me....😂
It looks like a Netflix adaptation!😆
These are the kind of remakes I like
But no siamese cats!
Female jock!
What the heck Disney!
this remake would be better if Walt Disney was still around
Not saying it will be bad
Disney Isn't the same "Disney" most of us grew up with.
I can understand why the siamese cats wouldn't fly, and I don't think a female Jock will end the world. I am, however, sick of these remakes though.
You mean *what the actual fuck* -I got you mate ;)
Kinda seemed nice until they removed the terrior and the cats
This movie will have much less emontion than live action lion king
Me: Weird Flex but ok
*Sam Elliot as Trusty*
Also Me: *pulls out wallet*
Right?! 😂
Same here
Nah, forget the movie, I'd LOVE to one day have a pet Cocker Spaniel that looks exactly like Lady! And the dogs here are lookin' pretty dang accurate! Well...besides Tramp.
Lady is an American Spaniel
@@petalblossom6107
She's still a cocker spaniel tho
American cocker spaniel and English cocker spaniel
Lady is an American cocket spaniel(honestly the cuter of the 2)
@@petalblossom6107 Don't worry, I've been known that already. Thanks for the reminder though.😉
I have one but she only has a mohawk surprisingly it's natural and not done by a groomer.
Honestly Lady looks high, maybe she shouldn't be around this Tramp.
Yay, another movie about talking animals. Like we don't have enough with "Benji", " El perro de la Casa Blanca", "Como perros y gatos", "Pet's secret life", "La razón de estar contigo", "Una chihuahua de Bervilly Hills", "Fluke", etc. etc.
Well damn it. They better not mess with Scamps Adventure
Or Lion King 2
Up next: *Atlantis: The Lost Empire* live action featuring Sean Connery, Meryl Streep, Shia LaBeouf, Lady Gaga and Danny DeVito!
Why does Lady look more like a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel rather than an a Cocker Spaniel? Can't say I'm overly excited about this
I think she's might be a cross, but either way, she needs some desperate grooming, her markings are meant to be pure white.
Siamese cat song gets cut because people get butthurt over everything 🤷♀️🤦♀️
Disney is still out of ideas more movies getting live action remakes
Writers block happens deal with it
Riren Miranda 101 Dalmatians are you serious? Didn’t they do that with Glenn Close? Hopefully it’ll be better than that last version
@@Sugarskulladdict97 Writer's block is not an excuse when they are a giant corporation with access to countless writers. Odds are ONE of them has an idea. Disney is just cashing in on nostalgia because they know they can, and it's easier to redo movies.
5 remakes in the same year, o boi!
littlekitsune1 well you have a point there srry I just put out what I was thinking they can and know they can do better
Nothing will beat the classics.
But why change my boi Jock-
Disney: *destroys the entire Club Penguin franchise because it wasnt "popular enough"
A bunch of people: Hey Disney, that wasnt cool, I lost my job and I've been working really har-
Also Disney: "Aye guys, dO YoU WaNT anOTheR LiVe aCtioN RemAKe???"
Everyone: :/
Tramp's new look is Not how I thought he'd be.
movies that need to be remaked:
Atlantis
treasure planet
the dark cauldron
the emperor new grooves
orenji12341 I agree. As long as they don't force in PC rubbish or unnecessary add ons to the plots, I think it would give those movies the recognition they deserve. (Especially Treasure Planet, one of my favourites)
The black cauldron actually is one of the only movies in my opinion where it would make sense for a remake as it has plenty of room for improvement the 2nd time around, itd take some hardcore laziness to somehow manage to make it worse
Whoever is green lighting these must be STOPPED.
This comment needs more likes
why isnt this top comment
If you don’t it like DONT watch it! No Disney is not going to stop if you people keep watching it.
@@theumpireofthebottomlesspit LOL, found the culprit greenlighting these things. X'D
Didn't mean to hurt ya' feelings. It'll be okay.
Everyone always complaining about the live actions.
If you don't like it, don't watch it.
I personally am looking forward to all the live actions. The originals will always be treasured and never replaced. It's all a bit of fun.
They can't go on forever though, they'll have to make some original stuff eventually
Who else will watch The Proud Family on Disney+ ?
Thanks for getting that song stuck in my head!
Do u think they’ll have the proud family and lilo and stitch crossover?
the PROUD Family is Over then had a movie to I think
was it Your Fav Show on Disney
what does + and ? Mark Mean
@@allison3852 The streaming service will be called Disney plus and instead of saying plus I used the addition symbol. Also since it was I question I asked I used the question mark.
@@MatsuyoRific You're welcome lol. I guess it is a really catchy song.
*BUSTER:* "Put this remake... down in the junkyyyaaaard! Straight to the juuuunkyard!"
I can actually hear him singing that!😂
It's been a while but I did manage to read that in the singing from the sequel in my head haha
getting really tired of Disney doing live action/cgi (basically realistic) versions/remakes of their animated classics.
i swear, its like they're saying 'screw cartoony animation, realism is the way to go'
no Disney, NO! In my opinion, this is NOT Disney magic.
Also, they are so out of ideas, they're just doing this to keep the studio going. but then again, let's face it, Disney never really had their own original ideas. All/most of their successful movies where just family friendly adaptations of stories by the Brothers Grimm (and maybe some others). this needs to stop
i used to have a problem with studios going 3D with their animations, but at this point, i think i'd prefer they did that. at least it will still have have the cartoony feel
*To all those ppl saying "if you don't like it don't watch it":* If people stuck with that philosophy the original lion King and Snow White wouldn't have been so popular. They were expected to fail the second it was released and if people were like " oh I don't like it so I'm not going to watch" those movies wouldn't have been as influencial as they are now. It's not like ppl are just looking for things to hate. They were just disappointed, and some of them were very open minded about the film only to have their childhood crushed in return. Your comments are not realistic to real life. For example: why do ppl eat McDonalds even though they know it's bad? Because it's there! Nobody cares that this movie is probably going to be bad as well as the other remakes, they just want to leave their comment and review the movie, but ppl keep judging others based on opinions. Ppl are gonna watch the movie regardless of whether they like it or not, whether they spend money on it is a completely different story altogether. Ppl who pay money for movies are slightly biased, mostly bc money was invested into the movie, so they feel as though they must justify what they bought whether they realize it or not. A person who invests no money at all into a movie is less bias to it, bc they contributed nothing to the movie to see it.
Am I the only one who likes the whole Live Action disney movies?? It's nostalgic and a way we haven't seen them before.
This was a really fun project to work on. Can't wait to see myself in the Trainyard.
Red Bare'N u worked on this?
@@maddalonefarms yep, I'm an Extra. I was lucky enough to work on this project 22 days in Savannah Georgia. The crew was fantastic and the catering was absolutely breathtaking. It was a surreal experience watching my hometown become apart of the Disney universe.
@jbiehlable LMAO Oh I'm with ya there.
Disney will you pls stop with the live action movies, you already ruined my childhood with Beauty and te Beast and now Aladdin...
Pls stop!
For real though Disney is getting on my nerves they are ruining the original classics that we all grew up with relying on nostalgia. I feel like after Moana they ran out of ideas
Aladdin was just fine, but once I heard Frozen 2 was going to be a thing and saw Scar's design for The Lion King, just...
@@Moonstar79 Frozen 2 is the movie of the year. Of course Toy Story 4 is something as well. But seriously thank goodness they gave Frozen a sequel instead of a subpar TV show like they did Tangled.
Correction. Beauty and the beast was awesome! (At least in my experience.)
Don’t hate on it please. I loved it. Lumiere was my favourite in particular so much so I painted him.(and Cogsworth)
You can check him out on my most recent video if you are interested.
0:48 If they did, the Humane Society would give them an earful.
It'll probably be a cgi beaver lol.
Peta
They are going to LIVE ACTION their ENTIRE library of films..... Just letting y'all know..... IT AIN'T GONNA STOP!!!
Not Pocahontas with today's sensibilities. Of course that could change in a few years I guess. Ten years ago books were lighter in tone and all of a sudden everyone wants their morally gray ickies to storm across the pages.
And… You got a problem with that? Don’t like the live action remakes then don’t watch them!
I don't quite understand why people are hating on the live actions so much I think they're quite enjoyable and to be honest they are catered to the new generation so that they are able to relish in these things without being bored but it also brings nostalgia for older generations. Y'all are just being picky unnecessary or not you have to admit that it is fun to see these old favourites re emerge as something different and wonderful!
Q: Why is this necessary
A: It’s not
"Hey waiter can I get a classic disney animated movie to go"
Waiter: oooh sorry, we just ran out but we could offer you a live action remake
Me: How does it taste
Waiter: uncreatively with a pinch of dissapointing and "i did not need this"
Me: No thank you
I'll just go over to Sony Pictures
They have a special going on called "Into the Spider-verse".
Oh that was so good, I got motion sickness watching it in theaters though lol
How could they think of changing Jacque into a girl?!?!?!
Yeah I don't really like the idea either.
I guess cuz it's 2019 and adding more female characters is the thing to do nowadays to get praised. At least that's the only reason I can come up with... They didn't even make him an old lady to keep the grumpy charm though, so it just feels disingenuous all around.
Jontron to Disney be like: *IM SICK OF YOUR SH%T!!!!*
As much as I love these movies I'm honestly getting tired of remakes.
I believe If Walt Disney was still alive today he would say to stop remaking his Animated Movies.
Actually he would be the complete opposite and support them. In fact he would basically side with Disney with how big have they grown.
@@SirCorn65 well of course he would, he would be stepping into the future. If you walked into your town 700 years into the future, you'd be amazed too.
@Estela Lopez no he didn't. He said retell the stories to the newer generations. No one said it had to be live action.
Do not change nothing at all leave the voices alone
I say it once and only once:
A LIVE ACTION REMAKE CAN’T REPLACE AND IS NOT BETTER THAN THE ORIGINAL
Disney is ready to cash in even more on nostalgia in November, and I'll still be buying the tickets since I'm a sucker for this timeless classic.😅
Because we all needed this...right?
Disney's
is on its way of remaking damn near every last one of their classic animated movies.
I want live-action remakes of:
Aristocats
Oliver and Company
Pocahontas
Tarzan
Emperor’s New Groove
Brother Bear
Home on the Range
Oof same^ but I also want The Fox & the Hound
Lilo and Stitch
Don't forget Pinocchio
Tarzan won't be happening, at least not by Disney, they lost the rights back in 2003
I really want Pinocchio as well
Jesus can we please get a good original disney movie again.
I'm so tired of these remakes and most of the original stuff is just is complete garbage made for a quick buck.
There are so many people with amazing ideas for stories who just need a chance to get them out there, but instead we get remake after remake...
Lady and the tramp is my all time favorite movie
I don’t want that ruined :((((
WHO IS ASKING FOR ALL OF THESE REMAKES?!!!!!!!!!
I want a live action The aristocrats
Will Mystery I want more cat movies in general. It’s always dogs dogs dogs.
@@talesseadolfson4313 I agree
Talesse Adolfson agreed
Officer Doge Possibly, but the other reason could be that Walt Disney apparently didn't like cats, which is probably why cats were villains (or at least not heroes) in the movies/cartoons when he was around.
@@officerdoge690 not true. Half the things you have to force a dog to do, a cat could do with a Lazer pointer and some cat treats
This movie has a special place in my heart
Why did you have to ruin it Disney
Soon they'll remake The Fox and the Hound oh god no
Don't give them any more ideas..... I at least need the fox and the hound to stay as is. 😞
Who asked for this??
@Ghool Goth
Literally NO ONE LMAO
They need to leave it well enough alone. Just release the original movies to theaters. I'd pay for that.
*The old one still looks better!*
Ok... NOW I'm thinking Disney has got to slow down with these remakes.
they cut the Siamese cat scene :(
That, actually pisses me off. :/ Gotta love living in a SJW world. :/
Still waiting to see a live-action Tarzan.
Its already exist the one with margot robbie
Disney can't do a live action Tarzan, they lost the film rights to the property back in 2003.
Steven Higgins property ????
@@theamazingandtalentedblake8296 As in intellectual property, IP.
How many are Disney going to make
The only way you're getting me on board with this is if you give Tramp a light saber.
Brave of Disney to think they can recreate the iconic Peg(gy Lee) number.
I know...and I like your combi of Peg the dog and the nod to Peggy Lee, both voiced and name..the then First lady Mamie Eisenhower was to be the namesake, maybe it was sdropped because such a SEXY dog would scandalize Mamie. Anyway we gotr Peg(gy Lee) dog..
Is this movie going to feature a horse-drawn dog pound wagon?
Probably not, it's animal abuse.
Why does everything have to be remade these days...😔 Leave the Classics alone will You
Shirokuma Otaku yeahhhhhh
@Sailor Sedna ya
So they can keep it going for the next Generation i see nothing wrong with it!!
If you don’t like it, don’t watch it!
I love the original as it is, but this looks pretty good! 😃
*exclusively premiering on Disney’s streaming service*
Me: Now be a good boy and *STAY THERE*
The fact that it's basically going straight to DVD tells me one thing...
don't even bother watching it
Why Isn’t it in theaters? I would definitely pay money to see the remake in theaters?
I guess they were scared cause how 101 (live action form) did?
I mean it merited a sequel so it couldn't have done too bad
STOP WITH THE REMAKES!!!🤮😡🤬
YES! UGH
Can you all stop harming Walt's will? He wanted this.. Stop disrespecting him.
@@joshuarumsey5639 Yes, but he would have never wanted them to make this many changes to the movies.
@@BayMaxAcademy Changes? There are NO CHANGES. Just new movies....
@@joshuarumsey5639 Yes, there are its support to be lady in the tramp made into a live move but they changed it to where almost every dogs a different breed, no No Siamese twins or song and extra. It's still Lady in the tramp so no it's not a new move just a remake with changes.
I didn't know they were remaking this too. It might turn out good though.
What's next tho? Aristocats maybe?
don't give them ideas
Me, the second I saw this- “aww shit, here we go again”🙄
‘Lady and the Tramp”?! That was one of my grandmother’s favorite movies as a teenager.
Disney's losing its heart, they keep bombarding us with tasteless live action "babamabooshka" and Pixar's obsession with long distance sequels makes it clear that they want to snuff DreamWorks at the Oscars again. Doing distributing rights for Fox is a mistake, I STILL consider Spies in Disguise NON-Disney.
Martyn McMurray DreamWorks is better at sequels than Disney is, in my opinion!
"All new". In other words, "The same, but live action. Probably with some unnecessary stuff thrown in to trick people into thinking they saw something new".
As a huge Disney fan who's sick and tired of the executives constantly milking Live-Action Remakes, I don't mind this.
Lane I agree. it doesn't look as bad I think Disney is doing better tbh
I'm just thankful that these animals are actually, factually LIVE-action. :)
You see..there are certain iconic masterpieces that will NEVER BE TOPPED and should be left alone; just the way they are, "Lady and the Tramp," is one of those masterpieces. Disney, do not DARE to touch this one, you ruined multiple movies by recreating them with ABOMINATIONS and aren't as potentially lively. It's not that they're BAD, it's just that they give off a different vibe of recreating the films and some things are changed now that made the movie as iconic.
I forgot that this ain't even gonna be theatrical, but DTV )made on;y for video).
Steve Carras Whew
This is Disney going back to it's roots. Live action movies with real dogs that weren't CGI