Finally! ESA Forcing FAA To Approve Falcon 9 Launch Today for Big Mission...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 окт 2024
- Finally! ESA Forcing FAA To Approve Falcon 9 Launch Today for Big Mission...
===
Intro
Why does ESA urge the FAA to resume Falcon 9? 0:44
Falcon 9’s superiority and problems 4:25
Future roles of Falcon 9 with SpaceX 6:12
Conclusion 9:50
outro 10:23
===
#greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa #falcon9
==
Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: smanager339@gmail.com
===
SpaceX Starship SN
Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
www.patreon.co...
Our video content is referenced by video sources at these sites:
1) SOURCES OF THUMBNAIL
2) SOURCES OF IMAGES AND VIDEOS
Everyday Astronaut: / erdayastronaut
/ everydayastronaut
WAI: / @whataboutit
/ felixschlang
Starship Gazer: / starshipgazer
/ starshipgazer
TijnM : / m_tijn
/ @tijn_m
LabPadre Space: / labpadre
/ labpadre
Greg Scott: / gregscott_photo
===
Finally! ESA Forcing FAA To Approve Falcon 9 Launch Today for Big Mission...
The aerospace industry is in a quiet period, largely because the Falcon 9 has been grounded to allow the FAA to investigate a recent incident. Every time this happens, numerous operations are affected. Recently, the European Space Agency (ESA), an agency outside the U.S., urged the FAA to resume Falcon 9 operations.
The Falcon 9 is incredibly important.
So, what exactly happened? Will the FAA make an unexpected decision? How crucial is the Falcon 9?
Let’s find out on today’s episode of Great SpaceX.
Finally! ESA Forcing FAA To Approve Falcon 9 Launch Today for Big Mission...
As we know, during the recent Crew-9 mission, the Falcon 9 second stage experienced issues that forced it to land outside the planned area. Despite this, the mission's primary goal was still achieved, with the Dragon spacecraft and its two astronauts successfully reaching the ISS.
To ensure safety, SpaceX voluntarily paused Falcon 9 operations for inspection, a necessary step to maintain the rocket's reliability. However, what could have been a short delay turned into a longer one when the FAA intervened, initiating a mishap investigation and making the return to flight more challenging.
This has affected several upcoming missions, particularly those scheduled for early October. One of the most prominent is the launch of the Hera spacecraft for the European Space Agency (ESA), set for October 7.
Recognizing the potential delay, ESA has been intensifying its efforts to pressure the FAA. During a briefing on October 2, ESA officials confirmed they were finalizing preparations to have Hera ready for its scheduled launch on Falcon 9 at 10:52 EDT on October 7. Ian Carnelli, ESA’s project manager for the Hera mission, expressed optimism, saying, "We will be ready to launch. We are basically hoping we get [FAA approval] by Sunday [Oct. 6]."
Finally! ESA Forcing FAA To Approve Falcon 9 Launch Today for Big Mission...
Carnelli further noted that ESA is prepared to launch Hera as Falcon 9’s return-to-flight mission, rather than waiting for one or more Starlink launches. “We’re doing all we can. SpaceX is going to submit their report to the FAA by the end of the week, and at that point, we’ll be in the hands of the FAA. I hope we get the green light to move to the pad and launch on Monday.”
In addition, ESA has extended the launch window through October 27. Carnelli concluded, “The fact that we had a very strict launch window, I think, pushed every single supplier to do their best. It really was an amazing project, and I can only be extremely proud of what we have achieved together.”
In an announcement on its homepage on September 30, ESA shared a photo of the Hera team, along with a confirmation: "The photo was taken inside the North Integration Cell of the SpaceX Payload Processing Facility, located at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. Just visible in the background, with red tags placed on its corner thrusters, Hera has now been filled with propellant and as a next step awaits encapsulation within its launcher fairing."
Despite the FAA delay, ESA is clearly determined to proceed on schedule, and there are key reasons why this mission is crucial for them.
----
We use images and content in accordance with the RUclips Fair Use copyright guidelines: www.youtube.co...
Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: colonbina25@gmail.com
To be resolved, thank you.
The FAA is the reason we're still flying aircraft designed in the 40's and 50's. Nothing new can get approved.
It's also in corrupt companies like bowing.. they'd rather not improve while funneling money into dark projects for the state at the cost of taking "smaller" cuts..
This is mainly why there is no improvement, they get enough money to rework their entire fleet BUT that comes at a cost of not getting a fraction of that money into their own offshore banks..
Also Y the state funded rockets have failed recently, the military no longer has use for rocket engineering because the tech needed from it has already been unlocked.. so it's also used as a funnel.
FAA old school and a different aviation authority should be created especially for space flights
So bad
Blame our safety record on the FA also.....
it is so sad to see political actions affecting negatively science progress... especially having double standards
FAA should inform their employers that their efforts to slow down SpaceX are starting to fail more and more and their grip on SpaceX is slipping through their fingers.
If the FAA does not allow Isa to launch they should tell the United States that they will he forced to revert to a Russian lunch system.
Wow another CLICKBAIT title!!
Why isn’t FAA INVESTIGATING the problems with the Vulcan mishap during launch
Politics
Nothing to do with Elon is it!
Because everyone knows precisely what went wrong already.
ULA made the amazing decision to work with the FAA, rather than do the Space X thing where they fight with them constantly and then tell the whole world what wankers Space X thinks they are.
How to win friends and influence people. Musk should try reading it.
No, ESA will miss the launch window.
The problem I’d the FAA does not like political companies and since Elon Musk has came out as MAGA, the FAA is taken action to punish Elon Musk!
The only problem with spaceflight is the FAA. They need to be removed from any authority over space as they are only proving they are not. Credible or trustworthy to handle the task
Yeah and what they replace it with can't be filled with "ex"Boeing employees like the faa.
@@scottjgray83 definitely 👍
The FAA needs to be kept in the dark.
Yes, the FAA approved the launch for today, But the weather will probably cause it to be delayed. Heavy rains and high seas offshore.
Hope that the weather favors SpaceX
Exactly WHO does the FAA work for? Go ahead, I'll wait.....
Errr… they work for the US public (as do all US Government employees).
However, just because they work for the public does not mean they have to do what YOU want them to do. If it worked that way, you could get away with any crime by telling the cops “you work for me and I don’t want to go to jail so you have to let me go”.
Here's an idea, launch a couple of falcon 9s , land em at the ESA launch site. with a bit of logistic construction Elon can then launch outside the US and FAA can screw itself.
Esa would love spacex in their country!
Wow, Europe has become a country?!?
FAA old school and a different aviation authority should be created especially for space flights
Another authority that can be used to punish innovators that are opposed to the current political administration is not a good idea, but just adds more tyranny. I would recommend reducing the agency role and scope of responsibility.
SpaceX is really important to all humankind, including us, who need imperatively Starship to launch our upcoming inflatable space habitat of 23 ton
Exactly
Yup. So maybe Musk could get with the program for once? His constantly tweaking the FAA's tail has slowed progress by years.
You need to discuss why Vulcan and new glen are not experiencing same faa hurdles. Ie when they start getting off more launches. Why are they not encountering any problems. Are their platforms better than spaceX? Has the Boeing mission received any faa investigations???
Seems to be one rule for SpaceX and another for everyone else. Why has ULA's Rocket not been grounded pending an investigtion?
I still wonder this
ESA earliest launch date 10/11 due to FAA and Milton. FAA secretly trying to punish SpaceX
Yes go spacex 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉for flight
🚀🚀🚀
SpaceX is held back because of Elans politics.
blame it on the democrats
@@bobstrauss9413 If it happens to be true then yes.
@@tray22 uhm . Use your eyes??? This has been going on since Obama destroyed all or good cheap cars!! And it stayed with Clinton and free trade designed to destroy o or industry and make China produce tons of co2 with coal plants
@@tray22i could also mention how Clinton is exactly why banks were forced to give bad loans and cause the sub prime mortgage crisis
I mean how can ppl not see China buying all or farms and turning them into
Great, now approve Starship!!!
Hopefully
SpaceX have to perform the mishap investigation then inform the FAA.
Short news tore to an endless video!
So, ESA is not forcing the FAA to approve falcon 9 launch.
One thing to always factor in with regard to government operations and decisions: the number one objective is always to maintain the bureaucracy. This, it is always necessary to "study the problem" more or by "gathering more data" or by "examining alternate approaches." In the case of the FAA, that bureaucracy can always assert "ensuring safety" as a reason for mandating delays, when the real reason is maintaining the bureaucracy.
Two blatant lies in one title.
1. ESA cannot and is not forcing FAA to do anything.
2. There is no F9 launch today.
I will be unsubscribing. I wish I could block.
I encourage everyone to do this to all titles that lie. Punish clickbait.
The title says the approval is today. Not the launch.
"Hera is currently scheduled to launch on Monday, Oct. 7, at 10:52 AM EDT (14:52 UTC) from Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40) at the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS) in Florida. With the formation of Hurricane Milton in the Gulf of Mexico, however, the current weather forecast for launch is 15 percent favorable." -NSF on the launch of Hera. low chances but it is scheduled. Scheduled ~3 hours from now. As for forcing the FAA, we do not know what happens in the ESA/FAA email chains but the FAA is allowing ONLY this launch to happen during the mishap investigation.
Indeed! The misinformation coming from SpaceX related channels has been off the charts lately…
Edit: and the comments sections genuinely make me loose faith in humanity…
"Don't recommend channel" is powerful tool.
1. Force might be too strong of a word, but ESA does have significant influence in the field
2. "FAA to approve" and "Falcon 9 Launch Today" aren't separate statements
All of this was just an excuse. They know there is really nothing wrong with falcon 9.
Yes
You are losing credibility with your click bait titles!!! please stop this practice!
I noted this to change, thanks
@@colonbina1 well im guessing its noted for after the clickbait title dies down the title will change to try get mroe clickbait and itnerest
So, B.O. has laid out a roadmap for the coming years. "SUE, SUE, SUE!!!....
New Glen and/or Vulcan could have the second stage crash in to Time Square and the FAA would say "Don't bother with an investigation; keep launching".
FAA clears Falcon 9 launch of Hera mission! It was reported yesterday but not for any other mission!
The regulation is why the us has so many obsoleat aircraft
TELL THE FAA TO TREAT ALL SPACE AGENCIES THE SAME OR GET OUT OF THE WAY..😡
But, but, but, equity! Not everyone starts in the same place! 🤮
No. I have delt with the FAA for years.
F150 farm truck commentators 😂
YES !
Bureaucracies will be the death of the USA. We need to elect governments that will eliminate bureaucracies. Our Federal Government is meant to be a referee not dictate minute changes in policy or product design. These functions are meant to be conducted by the states not the federal government.
Seeing if we can prevent Astrid impacts is STUPID
Why?
Solution One: Send a rocket to divert its orbit.
Problem: A) we don’t have such a rocket YET and B) we need to start the diversion YEARS in advance
solution Two, Nuke the asteroid.
Problem: just the obvious,namely that the public will never let us nuke an asteroid.
YES
What are consequences launching starship without the FAA permission
Fines. Contract losses. Reputational disaster
Consequences? Years of delays.
That's what we have now, SN8 was launched without permission and one of the full stack ones as well. Its unprecedented that a company launch without permission. Nobody else has ever done it before. The FAA don't trust Musk as far as they can throw him, with good reason.
Personally, I would put 90% of the 2 or so years we are behind schedule down to a Musk tantrum, the SN8 launch, and the current mess should result in much the same. Maybe longer.
However, the way out of all this is to fund the FAA properly and have Musk obey the rules for once. He needs to reset the relationship. Musk is too dim to get it right now, maybe after another couple of years he will.
I spent the best part of 2 years working on the A320 certification in the USA in the mid 90's. The FAA are a pain, but not so bad in reality. Treat them like idiots and they will bury you, as they have Musk.
Potential arrests and shut down of the company.
Great video Kevin 👍. Don't listen to the whiners
Yes.
Even here in germany we laugh about left-wing FAA and EPA. They are controlled by the democRATS.
What a joke. SpaceX should launch without any license!
This is a big humiliation
yes
summary of recent FAA actions in the space field
-1- say nothing about the obvious flaws of the Starliner
-2- be in "move along there's nothing to see" mode on the ULA launch problem
on the Space X side it's more like
"it's a shame but since the "accepted" stamp is not IN the box provided; the agreement is not valid; you will have to start the 6-month long procedure again"
and under the slightest pretext, even the most futile, the FAA imposes useless investigations
these actions seem to me more the mark of a primary school kid
[with a childish voice] "john he's better than paul! ; so if i annoy paul then john will give me candy" ....
not really the image that I had of a public institution formerly reputed to be serious.
question what is the probability that the administrator of the FAA keeps his post, whoever is elected on nov 5 ??
They might want to focus on aircraft, lot more lives involved, guess they didn't buy stock in SpaceX, now their pissed!
La faa tiene que desaparecer, pero ¡YA!
Im so sick of hearing about ESA. Clown show.
Impacts are useless. Drone booster tugs would be more effective. Landing these tugs onto the surface of the incoming comet and pushing it out of earth trajectory would be safer.
It is generally presumed that these things are not solid objects, but rather gravitationally bound rubble piles. This makes pushing them rather difficult.
@@sylviaelse5086 Impacting them makes them into shotgun blast.
We can’t launch in an election season….. just too many social issues to troll.
Why not launch Falcon 9 from the ESA Guiana Space Centre?
Because our almighty and omnibenevolent government won't allow it.
@@johnbrobston1334 Time for EURO SpaceX
@@john.b4170 Our almighty and omnibenevolent government would create obstacles to that too. The treat commercial space launch technology like it's the Crown Jewels or something. Elon would pretty much have to rebuild SpaceX from scratch in the EU.
@@john.b4170 Rocket technology is a National Security Item, so NO sharing with anyone.
Quite time consuming
B.O. wants to make a ten mile gap a 9.99 mile gap.
FAA could be history when trump gets in. Then StarShip will launch. It’s all to slow down Falcon 9 and StarShip.
The FAA are waiting for the others to catch up and overtake Space X. But will they ever?
I hope so
Only idiots who have no idea what the FAA actually do would want to dismantle the FAA.
You want airliners falling out the sky because the operators and manufacturers decided to save a few bucks or pay a dividend instead? You want rocket boosters falling on your local mall?
Check out the FAA free zone which is the Chinese space program dropping boosters on their citizens heads.
Think what happens when the genius Musk does this to Brownsville, just like he sand blasted South Padre Island.
Boca Chica was a truly terrible choice to locate Starbase and to try and conduct an iterative development program.
What resources did the FAA in South Texas have to oversee it? One man and his dog? How much did the Texas administration throw at beefing it up so it could handle the job ... a big fat zero.
Musk is bleating about the wrong people, he needs to bleat at the FAA's paymasters which is the State of Texas and its right wing, small Government, evangelists.
You want all this to move quicker? Give the FAA the budget to keep up and stop whingeing all the time.
Indeed this is a perfect opportunity to see if Spacex can build a partnership with ESA !
Both have so much to gain Spacex needs to wrestle out of the deathgrip of FAA initiated by the Democrats to kill Musk and at the same time ESA is hopelessly out dated and could use an infusion of technology by Spacex asap. Using the base in Guyana close to the equator is great May be in typical Musk style we can create a new company for launches of Falcon 9 in the US called Spacexit whilst all the innovative test launches / development are transferred to ESA in Guyana where FAA loses its role. ??
Faa is obsoleat rem9ve it
You mean corrupt?
Never seen such a gay jump for Trump like that before
Faa needs to be disbannded,or put elon in charge of the faa
No
I worked with the FAA getting the Airbus A320 certified in the USA. I have some understanding of why Space X have dug a bloody big hole and jumped into it, all of their own accord.
Their problems with the FAA are 100% down to Musk's frustration and his response to his own frustration. He twice decided to do the unforgivable. He launched without an inspector present and without permission. He can bleat all he wants, but he failed to get two flights signed off and went ahead anyway.
Nobody, but nobody at the FAA trusts him or Space X because of it. He's also sand blasted South Padre Island so his protestations of being a responsible operator have worn very thin on top of that.
Please correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t the A320 certified in the late 80’s or early 90’s in the US???? I’m not sure that is even relevant in today’s world.
F the FAA
The only problem with spaceflight is the FAA. They need to be removed from any authority over space as they are only proving they are not. Credible or trustworthy to handle the task
Yes