Harish Salve says the political system doesn't want rule of law
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 окт 2024
- Few lawyers in this country have achieved as much success and renown as Harish Salve. He spoke to us about growing up in Kanpur, switching from chartered accountancy to law at the behest of Nani Palkhivala, his work as Solicitor General of India, important cases he has argued, judicial activism, training and mentoring of juniors and much more. Published on September 30, 2010.
These are the kind of people who are supposed to be interview,not these stupid film stars..
Well said sir 👌👌👌 Not those film stars who are empty vessels
Bolo jubaan kesari
while Mr. salve was talking about phalkivala it felt as if i was amongst them that evening, enjoying the drinks and experience. wonderful listening to you sir mr. salve
savory icon same here..
ruclips.net/video/bi3J9jzeR9E/видео.html
His friend who is (now was) sitting judge in Bombay is Current chief justice of India justice S.A.Bobde
Really!!
Amazing to hear
@Srinath Kadiam sitting on a HD belonging to a bjp person does that make him biased in any manner. What bull shit of a comment. Any one living or coming for nagpur another snider of a bs comment. His education and stature in legal circles is commendable. His work in international court of justice .gr8 job .
Worth my 45 minutes 😇 so blessed to know Advocate 🙏 May God grand lots of love and blessings . Very 👍🏻
such sound oratory.. very pleasing to hear him speak
Sometimes I think how he became such a big lawyer I'm not doubting his credentials bt still reaching that level is a dream 4 many including me
Good contacts go a long way. His father had exceptional contacts and put him under very competent wings.
In india you need pedigree like his to become rich and famous.A powerful politician father with wide contacts who can place his son under the mentorship of a leading light in his profession.It is not enough if one possesses only talent.You need the booster rockets strapped to your belt like he had.
now his friend is the cheif justice of india
Very interesting, have a lot of respect for Mr.Salve
A good man Shri Salve. And yes a privileged childhood sir has had and so nice of him to share that with us.
And good brains.. CA, TAXATION n LAW.
truly inspirational. .....
Will pray for him to Lord Jesus always.He gave true justice to Arnab Goswami.God will bless him and his family.
A great and respected Lawyer.
Salute to you Sir.
A very honest lawyer gave his right verdict for ARNAB.ALL THE BEST TO HIM GOD BLESS HIM.🙏🙏🙏
Very Inspirational....
Mr.salve you are talking of rule of law. Let's share what's your contribution?you seem to help only rich and mighty.
What a privileged life! Nani Palkhivala is like your buddy.
It was a real pleasure to listen to MR Salve’s interview; makes you feel one has missed out on something ! The grass always looks greener on the other side of the fence.
Elated my comment appreciated!
@@swaruppriyadarshi2299 you also want to be lawyer like him......??
Hatts off to Mr.Salveji for his commitment to the national
Indeed a profound intellect but was also born with a silver spoon
@Karan Singh no but its imp to acknowledge the leverages and opportunities they get bcoz of their lineage.
प्रणाम हरीश साळवे साहेब 🙏🙏🙏
Dream of many to reach that level
Favourite lawyer
Don't forget. Despite being from a rich and powerful family....all of his family are highly educated. Most of them are CAs as well as Lawyers.
It's exultant ..
The judiciary of India is now completely political
Mr.Salve action taken report of Supreme Court why from 1950 " द्रौपदी मुर्मू राष्ट्रपति observation, थानेऔर कोर्ट लोग जुल्म शोषण भ्रष्टाचार केशिकार शिकायत दर्ज करने से डरते है"
Great Man 👍
#Accountancy is boring😂
accountancy covers up a very broad scope, i do not agree it is boredom it is your own perception to all scopes of trades even the truth depend on this not unless you do not want transparency so as law of the land.......
Description of Vid mentions Kanpur as his home. Tht is wrong. His hometown is Nagpur, MH.
what an absolute Chad of a person.
Supreme Court not lawmaker but protector of democratic laws enacted by parliament Supreme Court cannot scandalise the democratic process for setting up Azad Hind citizen's surveillance constitution under direction of DROUPADI Murmur President of India.
His father was from in my city chhindwara
sir tumla manapasun jai hind jai Maharashtra,jai nagpur,jai nashik pls sir khulbushan jadhav yaana justice milvun dya...
The interviewer has no poise and lacks conversational skills. He is abrupt though respectful. Here is one of the all time greats who is willing to share so much and much more could have been extracted from him.
He's a nephew of Nirmala mata
Ye kon hai
My Guru
Justice kranti zindabad
legend
Who should appoint judges is absurd questions of talentless persons ?. India is Independent sovereign welfare democratic Government .the three organs of constitution are subject to recognition and control of constitution. British colonialism judiciary judiciary additional temporary alien rules of laws British colonialism judiciary now collegium system not above sovereignty of government. Which was incorporated temporarily in constitution to overcome hooliganism after Independence dealt with by Supreme Court. It does not mean to continue 75years should have been disincorporated revoked by President of India.
Nice approch to negotiate @36:07
दोनो जज और पत्रकार को ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम जुल्म शोषण भ्रष्टाचार केशिकार लोगो के अधिकार हनन के मैकेनिज्म को उन्मूलन के बाद स्वतंत्र होना चाहिए। जबतक ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम जज और पत्रकार प्रशासन खुलेआम उसूल करवाते है।
🌹🎉🌺🙏🌺🎉🌹
08:03 the interviewer says, "okay", okay? Listen to his tone. It's like a punishment he's going through.
Alien Rule of laws British colonialism judiciary collegium system or
rules of laws preamble of constitution .clarify please.
Y is he sitting that way??
@pratik mohite regardless of my gender. That's no way to sit on TV
Advocates agents of judges appointed by collegium system confront with sovereignty of India.
0:27 about ex chief justice SA Bobde
Have you ever given opinion to Government of India to abolish British colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability to remodel on Indian thoughts and ideals? to save people from atrocities exploitation and corruption.
जनता और राजनीतिक महागठबंधन निर्वाचित प्रतिनिधिमंडल सन्सद आज़ाद भारत सम्बिधान समिति गठन कर आज़ाद भारत नागरिक निगरानी सम्बिधान निर्माण करने के अधिकार है Dr.Ambedkar sahib observed the factors on which the working of those organs of state depend are people and political parties they will set up as their instruments like legislature executive and judiciary for package of reform laying down democratic guidelines to overcome lapses and irregularities of constitution 1950 by enacting democratic laws to administer to attain their own ends to carry out the wishes of people .आज़ादी के बाद आज़ाद हिंद नागरिक निगरानी संविधान राष्ट्रपति द्रौपदी मुर्मू के देख रेख में संविधान 1950 Lordmounbettan Viceroy of interim Govt of the independent India के देख रेख में अस्थायी अनियन्त्रित अनियमित अव्यवस्थित गैरजिम्मेदार संविधान में ब्रिटिश क्लोनियल सिस्टम alien rules of laws constitutional but not democratic attacks on sovereignty प्रभुसत्ता of Hindustan should be abolished.
1950 आज़ादी मिली अर्थात प्रभुसत्ता sovereignty domination over India लोकतांत्रिक कानून व्यवस्था स्थापना जनता और राजनीतिक पार्टियों के प्रतिनिधि अधिकारी संसद
सुप्रीम कोर्ट पब्लिक सर्वेंट collegium system जजों की नियुक्ति
हिन्दुस्तान पार्लियामेंट के लोकतांत्रिक शासन
प्रभुसत्ता पर अतिक्रमण
This guy charges 6 -15 lakh per hour or case ?
Per hearing
जिसका केस किसी कोर्ट में निलंबित हैं
एक पेज में लिखे अशुद्ध शब्द व्यवहार ना करे.
केस नंबर तारीख जजों का नाम सरकारी अधिकारियों का नाम
Petitioner VS opposite पार्टी
घटना का जगह,थाना कोर्ट तारीख जिला राज्य दलालों माफ़िया का नाम
आप क्या चाहते हैं
और
आप का बिरोधी क्या चाहते है. ?
🚩 सत्य सत्य होता है
Hybrid mode of action not democratic.
Advocates and judges bureaucrats of British colonial legislation maliciously enshrined in Art 50 rejecting overhauling proposal of professor K.T.Shah member of the constitution drafting committee.
How much did he get paid for getting Arnab out ?
He fought the case probono
Chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice incapable of interpretation of British colonialism judiciary Independency how to abolish British colonialism from India.
What is rule of law ? The rule of law means personalification of executive autocracy to absolutism established by judges disqualified appointed by collegium system intentionally argument on Rs 50 Lakh per appearance engaged to illicit activities by criminal misconduct by illicit agreement with concerned judges appointed by collegium system Anti India.
Kya judiciary me corruption nhi hai.ydi Han to ise dur krne k lia kise aage aana hoga.
Mr Salve as a professional is good but the way he has aligned himself with all the bad things BJP sides with is disheartening. A true professional is like Mr Prashant Bhusan. He fights for the right cause in the intrest of common man of this nation. In my view he is someone who must praised . Salveji is a celebrity lawer in other words a dalal of the govt. In center.
You could've equated with so many greats but whom you chose to equate him with Bhushan and Sons 😂😂😂
भारत लोकतान्त्रिक सौभरेन गणराज्य सम्विधान दिशा-निर्देशक है। भारत सरकार सम्विधान का तीन तन्त्र खराब होगया तो रिपेयरिंग करे या रिप्लेसमेंट करे।
1) भारत का संविधानिक न्यायिक प्रणाली ढांचा लोकतान्त्रिक विधि-विधान
2), ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल न्यायिक प्रणाली ढांचा ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल विधि-विधान।
भारतीय जूडिशल सिस्टम supersided का कारण अस्थाई ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल मूलभूत सुविधाजनक न्यायिक प्रणाली अव्यवस्थित अनियमित अनियंत्रित गैर-निष्पादित गैरजिम्मेदार सम्बन्धित अधिकारी अप्रजातान्तरिक बेलगाम अधिकार फिर ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम अस्थाई अधिकारिक केन्सिल क्यो नही 5 करोड केस निलंबित और 17-18 लाख लोग विचाराधीन कैदी ।
Dear sir arnab goswami arrested in Mumbai
This guy has an estimated net worth of 63 million dollars
This guy has knowledge worth more than 63mn dollars
Government should bind down advocates and judges and admistrative machineries subject to recognition and control of Azad Bhart peoples surveillance constitution.
आजादी 1947 साथ साथ तीनो तंत्रों पर आधिपत्य sovereignty प्रभुसत्ता कोई आंख नहीं देखा सकता है लोकतांत्रिक कानून कॉलोनीयल बदलाव परिवर्तन कर लोकतांत्रिक न्यायिक प्रणाली का अधिकार मिला। अदालत कालोनियल सिस्टम था आजाद भारत सरकार मे लोकतांत्रिक कानून का कोई व्यवस्था नही था बाध्य होकर ब्रिटिश कालोनियांल सिस्टम न्यायिक प्रणाली अस्थाई सम्बिधान के Art 50 में आवश्यक मौलिक ढांचा structure अर्थात ब्रिटिश rules of law to enact by administrative machineries and judges to administer to attain their own needs सम्मिलित किया गया है जजों और वकीलों का फौज engaged to illicit activities by criminal misconduct आजाद भारत में अवैध धंधे अवैध निर्माण अवैध कब्जा जुल्म भ्रष्टाचार शोषण दलालों माफिया के साठगांठ वकीलों और जजों ने उगाही extortion उसी ब्रिटिश काल जैसे करने लगे ब्रिटिश कानून के मुताबिक जनता के अधिकारों का हनन और अधिकारियों के साठगांठ से माफिया दलाल लोग bit आफिस deployed कर उगाही शोषण भ्रस्टाचार जुल्म अत्याचार अवैध धंधे अवैध निर्माण जजों का मनमानी सहयोग जजों पर जजों की नियुक्ति निगरानी देश को खूब लूटा keshvanand Bharti case जाली दस्तावेज झूठे कालोनियांल सिस्टम से साजिश कर आर्डर निकाला सन्सद कोई लोकतांत्रिक कानून निर्माण नही कर सकता ब्रिटिश कालोनियांल सिस्टम को संशोधन कर सरकार कामकाज करे फिर बोला सुप्रीम कोर्ट केशवाननद आदेश के बाद भारत लोकतांत्रिक सरकार सम्बिधान का आवश्यक मौलिक ढांचा structure बदलाव नहीं कर सकता है .सन्देह पैदा हुआ सरकार के sovereignty पर अतिक्रमण दुर्भावनापुर्ण आचरण का पता लगाया गया Pil No.224 of 2017 filed on 24.04.2016 kept corruptly pending for removal of defects placed on judges on 10.07.2017 बिना मन की शादी कनपटी पर सिंदूर न्यायिक प्रणाली दूषित Ex chief Justice Jagdish singh khehar LLM gold Medalist and Justice Dy.Chandra chur LLM refused to direct competent authorities to dispose of the complaint of people by speaking and reasoned orders within specific period under monitoring of supreme court in terms of sobering observation of Dr Ambedkar sahib " the factors on which the working of those organs of state depend are people and political parties they can set up as their instruments like legislature Executive and judiciary enacting democratic guidelines to carry out the wishes of people to overcome illicit activities by criminal misconduct of supreme court imposing democratic guidelines to act within implied bound of democratic standards and judicial accountability guidelinennset up by people and political parties subject to recognition and control of Azad Hind peoples surveillance constitution.
Status of Azad Bharat sovereignty declared independent democratic welfare state
1), Govt had borrowed British colonial rules of laws/legislation enshrined in Art 50 temporarily as undefined essential basic structure of constitution
2), Govt of India After 75 years intended to remove British colonial rules of laws from constitution reasons:
a) Supreme Court judges and advocates engaged to illicit activities by criminal misconduct pending 5 crore cases affecting people victims of atrocities corruption exploitation unlawful business,
b),intentionally prepared false document keshvanand Bharti Case based on citation of precedents of British colonial judgments ignoring examining transactions in questions to ascertain truth banned parliament from changing essential basic structure of constitution which is invasion on sovereignty of Govt.
C), Complaints of people not to be ached upon.
d) PIL NO 2010 of 2012 Awadh Lal sharma and others VS union of India and others to change the system refused on citation of keshvanand Bharti Case .Delhi High Court
e), PILNO224OF 2017 refused on10,07,2017 condemned frivolous observation of Dr Ambedkar Sahib to abolish colonialism from constitution
f) from 1950 राष्ट्रपति द्रौपदी मुर्मू observation " थानेऔर और कोर्ट लोग जुल्म शोषण भ्रष्टाचार केशिकार शिकायत दर्ज करने से डरते है
g) Govt is authority for enacting democratic laws .having sovereignty for domination over all organs of state . Supreme Court is for regulation of rules of democratic laws collegium system does not fall within jurisdiction of Supreme Court
Supreme Court, judges advocates and media are agents of British colonial legislation enshrined in Art 50.rejecting overhauling proposal of professor K.T.Shah member of constitution drafting committee when India was declared democratic welfare state having sovereignty प्रभुसत्ता represented by elected representatives in parliament for domination over India by forming democratic Government subject to recognition and control of parliament but unfortunately Supreme Court vested unbridled power unaccompanied by liability selfgovernment before independence enshrined in Art 50 .subject to control of parliament which made a decision by internationally preparing false document to internationally save themselves in keshvanand Bharti Case based on citation of precedents of British colonial judgments as precedents leading parliament to miscarriage of justice to dominate parliament and so people need
Azad Hind Democratic citizen's surveillance constitution set up by people and political parties in alliance being aggrieved by refusal dated 10.07,2017 in PILNo 224 of 2017 by Ex chief Justice Jagdish singh khehar and Justice Dy.Chandrachud now chief Justice Supreme Court condemned frivolous imposed Rs one lakh costs upon petitioner RAJ BALAM SHARMA Advocate Supreme Court petitioner VS Supreme Court and political parties respondents but the judges found
disqualified in interpretation of British colonial legislation to change into democratic standard and judicial accountability
and finding reported to PM law minister Govt of India Home Minister Govt of India on 19.07.2017 and further to Ex President of India Ramnath kovind on 20.07.2020 to
lay down guidelines by deliberation of actions and reactions of opinions of delegates of people belonging to all castes and religions by collective wisdom to enact democratic laws to administer to attain their own ends following thoughts and ideals of democracy to setup as their instruments like legislature executive and judiciary to carry out the wishes of people subject to recognition and control of Azad Hind citizen's surveillance constitution observed by Dr Ambedkar sahib to overcome lapses and irregularities of constitution 1950
Rebelious debates must be banned by revoking authorization granted in favor of Supreme Court to deal with British colonial legislation superseding preamble of constitution.
Rebelious debates of judges advocates agents of British colonialism should be crippled by revocation of authorizations of British colonialism judiciary Independency.
President of India should revoke temporary official permission granted in 1950 in favor of Supreme Court invite Shaheed Udham Singh.
जजो के फौज लोकतंत्र पर अतिक्रमण भारत सरकार लोकतान्त्रिक सौभरेन गणराज्य जनता और राजनीतिक दल महागठबन्धन कानून निर्माण का अधिकारी जजो का रिबेलियस डिवेट भारत सरकार के sovereignty पर अतिक्रमण बगावत जनता के अधिकार हनन 5 करोड केस निलंबित और 17-18 लाख कैदी विचाराधीन खुलासा PIL N0 224 0f 2017beyond understanding on 10.07.2017 by chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice incapable of the of British colonialism judiciary Independency superseded preamble of constitution in 1950.
Govt does not want ,British colonial rule of law incorporated temporarily in constitution in Art 50 rejecting overhauling proposal of professor K.T.Shah member of constitution drafting committee subject to recognition and control of Supreme Court soon India declared democratic welfare independent India because
1), 5 crore cases are pending in Supreme Court for infringement of rights of 40 crore people victims of atrocities corruption exploitation unlawful business despite guaranteed by constitution to protect rights of people .
2), incapacity of.judges explicitly define British colonial legislation in PILNO224OF 2017 on 10.07.2017 by ,Ex chief Justice Jagdish singh khehar gold medalist LLM and Justice Dy.Chandrachud LLM condemned observation of Dr Ambedkar Sahib frivolous imposed Rs one lakh costs upon petitioner RAJ BALAM SHARMA Advocate Supreme Court petitioner
3), complaints of people not to be acted upon ..
4) थाने और कोर्ट लोग जुल्म शोषण भ्रष्टाचार केशिकार शिकायत दर्ज करने से डरते है।
Droupadi Murmur President of India observation
5), intentionally prepared keshvanand false document on citation of precedents of British colonial judgments ignoring to examine the transactions in questions to ascertain truth.
जजों को dalali नहीं चलेगा.
I don’t like Harish salve because he is close to the BJP
अन्तिम समय मे बदल भी जाता है ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल जबाबदेही नही ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम का एजेंट वकील सुप्रीम कोर्ट जजे 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners enfringement of rights और 5 crore backlog cases enfringement of rights 75 वर्षों से जनता जुल्म शोषण भ्रष्टाचार अव्यवस्थित अनियमित अनियंत्रित गैर-निष्पादित गैरजिम्मेदार के शिकार शिकायत दर्ज पर करवाई वर्जित तारीख पर तारीख वकील जजो का दलाल गरीब लोग की जमीन हडप 5 लाख दलाल वकील पत्रकार लगा क, शोषण भ्रष्टाचार होते है।चोर ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम 5 crore backlog cases pending president of India should revoke authorization granted in favor of Supreme Court .debates should be avoided. Judges British colonialism agents under control of alien rules of laws and so people victims of atrocities exploitation and corruption enfringement of rights.
मोदी सरकार ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम अस्थाई सुप्रीम कोर्ट से बदलने की आवाज उठाए है।सरकार किसी भी पार्टी का 1950 से मज्जा लूटा किसी ने सम्विधान से ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम अस्थाई बदलने की आवाज नही उठाए उस का दुष्प्रभाव 5 करोड केस निलंबित और 17-18 लाख लोग विचाराधीन जेल।
सरकार लोकतान्त्रिक सौभरेन गणराज्य भारत लेकिन ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम अस्थाई सम्विधान का आवश्यक मौलिक ढांचा 1950 मे सम्विधान मे सम्मिलित आजादी के बाद हुडदंग शान्त करने केलिए सुप्रीम कोर्ट के सञ्चालन लेकिन 75 वर्ष मनमानी जुल्म शोषण भ्रष्टाचार अव्यवस्थित अनियमित अनियंत्रित गैर-निष्पादित गैरजिम्मेदार कुछ वकील पत्रकार के साठगांठ केशवाननद भारती केस बर्जित सरकार लोकतान्त्रिक कानून नही बना सकती और ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम सम्विधान से बदल नही सकती है। सुप्रीम कोर्ट रिबेलियस डिवेट राजद्रोह है।
Define democratic standards and judicial accountability subject to recognition and control of preamble of the constitution
VS
British colonialism judiciary Independency/collegium system alien rules of laws in Supreme Court beyond interpretation capabilities of chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice in PIL No.224 of 2017 on 10.07.2017 now 5 crore backlog cases pending enfringement of rights of people and 17-18 under trial prisoners
10 करोड की जमीन एक सेठ आदिवासी को घायल कर कब्जा किया आदिवासी का एक सौ रुपए फीस का वकील था 325 IPC धारा मे केस किया सेठ का वकील 50 लाख रुपए फीस दो पेसी मे आदिवासी हार गया ..जज साहब किस धारा मे आदिवासी का केस फैसला किया? 50 लाख फीस का वकील इन्द्र लोक से कानून पढ कर आया था?
Anti India disloyality and disaffection to sovereignty of India. Define democratic standards and judicial accountability subject to recognition and control of preamble of the constitution
VS
British colonialism judiciary Independency/collegium system alien rules of laws in Supreme Court beyond interpretation capabilities of chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice in PIL No.224 of 2017 on 10.07.2017 now 5 crore backlog cases pending enfringement of rights of people and 17-18 under trial prisoners
पालकीवाला और साल्वे सिबल सब ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल निरंकुश कानून का रक्षक 5 करोड केस निलंबित 17-18 लाख विचाराधीन कैदी अधिकांस आदिवासी समुदाय गरीब St SC जनता अधिकार हनन PIL No.224 of 2017beyond understanding of chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice.
1), जनता और राजनीतिक महागठबंधन निर्वाचित प्रतिनिधिमंडल सन्सद sovereignty प्रभुसत्ता लोकतांत्रिक सरकार लोकतांत्रिक कानून निर्माण अधिकारी। domination over a large human beings having power 0 f constitution forming democratic Government to rule over India by setting up
1), legislature wing for enacting democratic laws and guidelines of rules of lawsto serve people
2), executive wing to implement democratic laws
3), judiciary wing subject to recognition and control of administrative machineries and acted upon the democratic laws
To
Sri Kiren Rijiju
Union LawMInister Govt of India
British structured and designed Judiciary with Judges and advocates agents of British colonialism administrators temporarily incorporated colonialism under Art 50 in constitution when Independent India had no democratic mechanism in Independent democratic welfare Government after Independent .
1),Collegium system corruptly prepared by fouz of judges and advocates agents of British colonialism incorporated temporarily in Art 50 in constitution 1950 .kept corruptly pending 5 crore backlog pending cases by perfunctory actions by hybrid mode.
2) it was revealed on 10.07.2017 PIL NO.224 of 2017 filed by Raj Balam Sharma Advocate Supreme Court petitioner VS Supreme Court and political parties Respondents for abolition of colonialism from constitution on 24.04.2016 kept corruptly pending in disguise of removal of defects but placed before Ex chief Justice Jagdish singh khehar LLM gold Medalist and Justice Dy.Chandra chur LLM now chief Justice incapable of interpretation of colonialism subject matter of pages 160 complaints of people not to be acted upon reported by PC Jain Administrative reform commission set up in 1998 by NDA Government and continued by Manmohan Singh Government but failed .from 1950 observed by President of Independent India in 2022 by Ms द्रोपदी मुर्मू " थाने और कोर्ट लोग जुल्म शोषण और भ्रष्टाचार के शिकार शिकायत दर्ज करने से डरते है,"
3), The corrupt judges and advocates of supreme court British colonial structured were permitted by Independent democratic welfare Government of India.
4), while no democratic guidelines to deal with judiciary by Independent democratic welfare Government of Independent India.
5), the judges and advocates agents of British colonialism corruptly concealed design of facilitation of commission of offence disobeyed democratic standards and judicial accountability.
6), the purpose of colonial judges and advocates intended to dominate over sovereignty of Independent India .
7),intentionally prepared false documents in keshvanand Bharti case 1973 on citation of precedents of colonialism judgments knowing it contrary to laws.
8), that intentionally prepared keshvanand Bharti case by false documents colonialism not acceptable to people and political parties representing in parliament and democratic welfare Government of Independent India having sovereignty प्रभुसत्ता.
9), It passed 75 years of colonialism judiciary in Independent India because the judges and advocates agents of British colonialism by perfunctory actions by hybrid mode kept backlog pending 5 crore cases incapable of disposal of cases by speaking and reasoned orders within specific period as if they have got sovereignty by domination over Independent democratic welfare Government of Independent India.
10), by virtue of decision of keshvanand Bharti case intentionally prepared false documents banned Government of Independent India from changing any essential basic structures of constitution which are undefined separation of power and power of judicial review which means colonialism against which people sacrificed their lives in Jalianvala Bag in1919 massacre and Udham singh king of martyrs shot dead sir miechal Dower,then Governor of Punjab in Caxton Hall London in 1946 who had order to shoot fire on Indian peacefully demanding abolition of colonialism from India for freedom but corrupt judges and advocates agents of British colonialism dishonestly and intentionally cheated people and political parties representing parliament of Independent Bhart welfare Government dishonestly and intentionally prevented Independent India from enacting democratic laws and from changing any part of essential basic structures of constitution which are colonialism to further infringe the rights of people by colonial rules of laws.
ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल न्यायिक प्रणाली जुल्म शोषण भ्रष्टाचार 5 करोड केस निलंबित जनता अधिकार हनन जस्टिस डीवाई चन्द्र फिर चीफ जस्टिस कैसे ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम ब्याख्या मे अयोग्य PIL N0 224 0f 2017 on 10.07.2017.
Harish salve advicate in Supreme Court British colonialism agents for unfair dealings of cases pending 5 crore backlog cases in conspiracy with mafia groups judges and some advocates and Patrakars and retired judges anti India. President of India can tackle tussle between government and Supreme Court by cancellation of British colonialism judiciary Independency superseded preamble of constitution in 1950.
1), which is undefined separation of power and power of judicial review
2), essential basic structure of constitution
3), in article 50 in favor of Supreme Court
4), to deal with incorporated temporarily by officials permission by Lord Mountbatten viceroy of interim government of Independent India .
5), PIL N0 224 0f 2017 for abolition of colonialism judiciary on 10.07.2017 disqualified refused without understanding by judges appointed by collegium system.
6), 5 crore backlog cases pending and 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners enfringement of rights of people victims of atrocities exploitation and corruption
7), beyond interpretation of Dy.Chandra chur elevated as chief Justice with chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired unfit Anti India
8), appointed by British colonialism now collegium system set up by seditious conspiracy
9), disloyality and disaffection to sovereignty of India. .
10) struck off NJAC appointments of judges by Government.
Harish salve! President of India Supreme authority can revoke authorization granted in favor of Supreme to deal with British colonial legislation judiciary anti India Indian rule of democratic standards and judicial accountability subject to control of preamble of constitution to serve people. Outcome of deliberations of actions and reactions of opinions of delegates of people representing parliament. People need abolition of colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability anti India disloyality and disaffection dealt with Supreme Court alien rules of laws not acceptable to people and government of India.
Judges and some advocates and some patrakars intended to encourage people for confrontational activities against sovereignty of India.people need Sedition statute is protector of sovereignty of India where judges and some advocates and some patrakars engaged to illicit activities by criminal misconduct by illicit agreement acted by frequently judicial Independent overreach unbridled power unaccompanied by liability not democratic standards and judicial in. People need change of British colonialism into democratic laws. Judges appointed by collegium system are subject to recognition and control of British colonialism legislation working under implied bounds of British colonialism anti India. President of India MS Droupadi Murmur can disincorporate revoke authorization granted temporarily in favor of Supreme Court to deal with British colonial legislation. Which superseded preamble of constitution defied sovereignty of India not tolerable and acceptable to people need change of colonialism into democratic standards and judicial accountability to overcome joint ventures of advocates agents of judges appointed by collegium system to damage constitution.
बहुत थेंथर है साल्वे 5 crore cases backlog and 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners enfringement of rights and judges disqualified in interpretation of British colonialism judiciary/.collegium system appointing judges becoming agents of British colonialism system what about Govt plan for its abolition which superseded preamble of constitution. .President of India can tackle tussle between government and Supreme Court by restoring power of constitution by revocation of British colonialism judiciary from constitution. जस्टिस डीवाई चन्द्र चुर चीफ जस्टिस जगदीश सिंह खेहर के साथ सुप्रीम कोर्ट मे PIL N0 224 0f 2017 on 10.07.2017 5crore cases backlog और 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners enfringement of rights denial of access to justice beyond interpretation because British colonial judiciary incorporated temporarily in article 50 in constitution superseded preamble of constitution dealt with by Supreme Court frequently judicial Independent overreach unbridled power atrocities exploitation and corruption. Complaints of people not to be acted upon.
British colonialism judiciary undefined now collegium system Anti India even disqualified persons can be elevated judges chief Justice revealed on 10.07.2017 in PIL N0 224 0f 2017 unless revoke by President of India authorization granted in Article 50 in favor of Supreme Court to deal with temporarily in 1950 in constitution
Mr.salve, why British colonialism judiciary Independency should not be cancelled to continue furher in PIL N0 224 0f 2017beyond understanding of chief Justice Dy.Chandra chur incapable to define British colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability subsided preamble of constitution for wrongful gains denial of access to justice enfringement of rights of people 5 crore backlog cases pending.
No body be allowed to give suggestions to Independent Government except people victims of atrocities exploitation and corruption enfringement of rights. It's sovereignty of government of India not to entertain outside opinions from judges appointed by judges under collegium system anti India disloyality and disaffection to sovereignty of India. Sovereignty of India is Independency to enact laws for domination over three organs of constitution subject to recognition and control of Government made by people representing parliament by deliberations of actions and reactions of opinions of delegates of people in parliament. Unfortunately British colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability with frequently judicial Independent overreach temporarily incorporated to deal with by Supreme Court in article 50 to control hooliganism after Independence but continued 75 years which should have been disincorporated revoked by President of India .the judges in Supreme Court got opportunities intentionally prepared false documents in keshvanand Bharti case 1973 citation of judgments as precedence not explicitly defined British colonial judiciary system following the principles of Indian customs and rites regardless of consequences whereby superseded preamble of constitution which means for domination over sovereignty of India .Now Supreme Court judges defied sovereignty of India struck off NJAC appointments of judges by Government and set up Collegium system heredatory Monarch self-government appointed judges by judges disqualified judges 5 crore backlog cases pending and 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners enfringement of rights of people revealed on 10.07.2017 in PIL No.224 of 2017beyond understanding of chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice incapable.
यह जरूरत है कि जज को क्या मिलता है कि जनता अधिकार हनन 5 करोड केस निलंबित अधिकार हनन 17-18 विचाराधीन कैदी PILNO.224 OF 2017beyond interpretation capacity of chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice incapable by collegium system anti India. Keshvanand Bharti case verdict कुछ वकील पत्रकार धूर्त जज सरकार को गुमराह भ्रमित कर ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम दुष्प्रभाव सरकार लोकतान्त्रिक कानून निर्माण करना वर्जित है ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम बदलाव करना वर्जित है सरकार का सम्विधान सुधार वर्जित है सम्विधान को ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम supersided कमजोर बना दिया 1950 से लोकतान्त्रिक कानून बनाना वर्जित है जब तक ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम को सुप्रीम कोर्ट से राष्ट्रपति केन्सिल नही करते है।
Research reports submitted on 19.07.2017 to Government of India.
PILNO.224 of 2017 arose from Dictatorship of Supreme Court 5 crore cases pending and 17 to 18 lakh in prisoners under trial enfringement of rights of people victims of atrocities exploitation and corruption by British colonialism judiciary deserved to be abolished from India administrative machineries including constitution
refused on 10.07.2017 by chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice giving direction upon competent authority to revoke official authorization granted British colonial judiciary Independency incorporated temporarily without explicitly defined in constitution in 1950 now collegium system Anti India should have been disincorporated revoked by President of India now 75years defying sovereignty of India.
President of India MS Droupadi Murmur should examine the quality of Dy.Chandra chur elevated as chief Justice incapable exposed in PIL N0 224 0f on 10.07.2017 chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur elevated chief Justice disqualified incapability to define British colonialism beyond their interpretation capacity. Keshvanand Bharti verdict restricted parliament from enacting democratic laws and changing British colonialism essential basic structure of constitution temporarily granted in favor of Supreme Court Anti Indian. Judges rebellious debates refer the judges are Anti Indian by temporarily incorporated British colonialism in constitution. Supreme Court subject to recognition and control of British colonialism alien rules of laws not democratic standards and judicial accountability for which constitution of India drafted and introduced in 1950 to carry out the wishes of people for the factors on which the workings of those organs of state depend are people and political parties they will set up as their instruments to carry out the wishes of people sources of Supreme authority of preamble of constitution. Collegium system derived from British colonialism system temporarily incorporated in constitution granted authorisation for time being to control hooliganism after Independence dealt with by Supreme Court judges but unfortunately superseded preamble of constitution defied sovereignty of government of Independent India. President of India can revoke authorization granted temporarily by Lord Mountbatten viceroy of interim government of Independent India.
कुछ पत्रकार कुछ वकील दलाल कुछ सुप्रीम कोर्ट जज रिटायर्ड जजो का फौज सरकार से बगावत रिबेलियस डिवेट मुर्ख सत्ता 1950 से बदलते रहते है हिम्मत है तो ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम 1950 मे अस्थाई सम्विधान मे सम्मिलित आवश्यक मौलिक ढाचा अप्रजातान्तरिक बेलगाम अधिकार जो सत्ता मे आता ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम का रक्षक सुप्रीम कोर्ट सञ्चालक सम्विधान को अस्थाई superseded अतिक्रमण किया है। दिनांक 19,07,2017 रिसर्च रिपोर्ट सरकार को जमा हुआ उसका कपी सोनिया गान्धी रिसीव की । लेकिन राहुल गान्धी जानबूझकर कर बुरे नियत से लेने से इन्कार, अत: वापस। Comment failed कोई मीडिया मन्जूर नही करता ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम अस्थाई अधिकारिक एजेंट दलालो माफिया ग्रूप कुछ पत्रकार कुछ वकील सुप्रीम कोर्ट के कुछ जज की आजादी आधिपत्य दुष्प्रभाव सम्विधान पर अतिक्रमण। हिन्दुस्तान वाले सावधान! दलाल माफिया भडुआ लोगो का फौज बगावत हेतु प्रचार चालू कर दिए।
1950 से अस्थाई ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम
न्यायिक प्रणाली केन्सिल का अधिकारी है। राष्ट्रपति,द्रोपदी उपराष्ट्रपति धनखडे, केन्द्रीय कानून मन्त्री रिजिजू आवाज उठाए मोदी सरकार।
1), ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम अस्थाई अधिकारिक एजेंट आधिपत्य दुष्प्रभाव सम्विधान पर अतिक्रमण subsided 1950 मे किया ।
2),उस का उन्मूलन सुधार हेतु कोई आवाज नही उठाया ना राजनीतिक दल, जज ,वकील पत्रकार, रिटायर्ड जज, इक्सपर्ट सब अयोग्य असक्षम असमर्थ बेवकुफ बकवास भ्रमित गुमराह अव्यवस्थित अनियंत्रित गैरजिम्मेदार
3),नतीजतन ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल दलाल वकील हरिश साल्वे फेसबुक यूट्यूब पत्रकार जज ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल न्यायिक प्रणाली जुल्म शोषण भ्रष्टाचार
4),PIL N0 224 0f 2017 on 10.07.2017 ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम के शिकार 5 करोड केस निलंबित और 17-18 लाख कैदी विचाराधीन सुप्रीम कोर्ट चीफ जस्टिस जगदीश सिंह खेहर और जस्टिस डीवाई चन्द्र चुर अयोग्य घोषित ।
5), राजनीतिक दल या सुप्रीम कोर्ट जज, कुछ वकील, कुछ पत्रकार सब ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल न्यायिक प्रणाली जुल्म शोषण भ्रष्टाचार केशिकार जनता अधिकार हनन होते है जनता को भ्रमित गुमराह झांसा देते है।
PILNO.224 of 2017 खुलासा अयोग्य असक्षम सुप्रीम कोर्ट जस्टिस डीवाई चन्द्र चुर अभी चीफ जस्टिस disqualified appointed by collegium system Anti India
सरकार का ब्रह्मास्त्र राष्ट्रपति कभी भी केन्सिल कर खत्म कर सकते है temporarily authorization granted 1950 से ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम जुडीसियरी का सञ्चालन सुप्रीम कोर्ट का आधिपत्य alien rules of laws anti India अस्थाई सम्विधान मे अथराइजेशन अनुच्छेद 50 जिस को दलाल वकील पत्रकार रिटायर्ड जज इक्सपर्ट और जज उजागर नही किए बुरे नियत जानबूझकर कर जनता को गुमराह भ्रमित रखे।
Has preamble of constitution provision to add British colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability to be superseded by British colonialism judiciary now collegium system anti India.
Chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice disqualified 5 crore cases backlog and 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners enfringement of rights of people revealed on 10.07.2017 in PIL N0 224 0f 2017 incapable of interpretation of British colonialism judiciary temporarily incorporated in constitution in 1950 should have been revoked but continued 75 years because टिप्पणी करना वर्जित है
Almost legislature executive and all judges some advocates agents appointed and working under collegium system derived from British colonialism oppressive laws alien rules of laws are Anti Indian incapable of interpretation of abolition of British colonialism judiciary are disqualified are subject to recognition and control of British colonialism judiciary protected by Supreme Court. Preamble of constitution has been superseded cannot protect the rights of people unless revocation of authorizations temporarily granted in favor of Supreme Court by President of India MS Droupadi Murmur.
Rules of laws British colonialism judiciary temporarily incorporated in article 50 undefined separation of power and power of judicial review essential basic structure of constitution beyond amending power of parliament subject to recognition and control of British colonialism legislation protected by Supreme Court Anti democracy rebelious debates threats to sovereignty of India.
PILNO.224 of 2017 खुलासा अयोग्य असक्षम सुप्रीम कोर्ट जस्टिस डीवाई चन्द्र चुर अभी चीफ जस्टिस disqualified appointed by collegium system Anti India 5 crore backlog cases enfringement of rights of people
सरकार का ब्रह्मास्त्र राष्ट्रपति कभी भी केन्सिल कर खत्म कर सकते है temporarily authorization granted 1950 से ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम जुडीसियरी का सञ्चालन सुप्रीम कोर्ट का आधिपत्य alien rules of laws anti India अस्थाई सम्विधान मे अथराइजेशन अनुच्छेद 50 जिस को दलाल वकील पत्रकार रिटायर्ड जज इक्सपर्ट और जज उजागर नही किए बुरे नियत जानबूझकर कर जनता को गुमराह भ्रमित रखे।
चोरी का दल का नेतृत्व करने वाले वच गए
Mr Harish salve fouz of retired judges some advocates and patrkar agents of British colonialism judiciary Anti India disloyality and disaffection to sovereignty of India.
Nanabhai Palkivala senior advocate legal expert lost moral qualities acting within implied bounds of British colonialism judiciary collegium system incorporated temporarily in article 50 in constitution granted authorisation for time being not for 75years should be revoked by President of India. DY Chandra chur chief Justice Supreme Court appointed by collegium system epitome of disqualification, incompleteness beyond interpretation capabilities and control 5 crore backlog cases pending and 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners enfringement of rights of people victims of atrocities exploitation and corruption exposed from PIL N0 224 0f 2017 on 10.07.2017 with chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired unfit Anti democracy rebelious debates threats to sovereignty of India appointed by collegium system alien rules of laws British colonialism judiciary Anti India disloyality and disaffection incited people for confrontational activities against sovereignty of India superseding preamble of constitution unless cancellation of authorizations temporarily granted in 1950.in constitution without overhauling rejecting overhauling proposal of professor KT Shah member of constitutional drafting committee.
President of India should revoke temporary official permission granted in 1950 in favor of Supreme Court.
जजो के फौज लोकतंत्र पर अतिक्रमण भारत सरकार लोकतान्त्रिक सौभरेन गणराज्य जनता और राजनीतिक दल महागठबन्धन कानून निर्माण का अधिकारी जजो का रिबेलियस डिवेट भारत सरकार के sovereignty पर अतिक्रमण बगावत जनता के अधिकार हनन 5 करोड केस निलंबित और 17-18 लाख कैदी विचाराधीन खुलासा PIL N0 224 0f 2017beyond understanding on 10.07.2017 by chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice incapable of the of British colonialism judiciary Independency superseded preamble of constitution in 1950.
Dy.Chandra chur chief Justice Supreme Court appointed by collegium system confronts with Government of Independent India disqualified judge reveals from PIL N0 224 of .2017 on 10.07.2017 and Mr salve Anti democracy rebelious debates threats to sovereignty of India act within implied bounds of British colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability contrary to preamble of constitution superseded by British colonialism judiciary now collegium system seditious conspiracy imposed practice for domination over sovereignty of India. President of India should cancel revoke temporarily and incorporated in constitution in 1950.by Lord Mountbatten the viceroy of interim government of Independent India.
President of India only has super power to cancel temporarily granted permission in1950 incorporating British colonialism in constitution after Independence to deal with by Supreme Court not to become British colonialism agents for intending to domination over sovereignty of India but Supreme Court superseded preamble of constitutionnfor 75 years without renewal of temporary authorisation for British colonialism judiciary is supposed Indian by Supreme Court judiciary leading people to miscarriage of Justice evading prohibitition imposed by laws resorting to contrivance in disguise of legality..
Complaints of people victims of atrocities exploitation and corruption enfringement of rights of 5 crore backlog cases pending and 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners enfringement of rights under British colonialism legislation subject to recognition and control of Supreme Court not to be acted upon reported by PC jain administrative reform commission because British colonial judiciary incorporated temporarily in article 50 in constitution in 1950 by Lord Mountbatten viceroy of interim government of Independent India.
President of India Supreme authority can revoke authorization granted in favor of Supreme to deal with British colonial legislation judiciary anti India Indian rule of democratic standards and judicial accountability subject to control of preamble of constitution to serve people. Outcome of deliberations of actions and reactions of opinions of delegates of people representing parliament. People need abolition of colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability anti India disloyality and disaffection dealt with Supreme Court alien rules of laws not acceptable to people and government of India.
सुशांत सिंग राजपूत को न्याय दीजिए प्लीज सर
Political system fall within jurisdiction of people alliance with Political parties judges appointed by collegium system and their agents some advocates and patrkars are Anti India. Supreme Court is one of organs of government not above sovereignty of India and Government is not binding to alien rules of laws British colonialism judiciary dealt with by Supreme Court judges appointed by collegium system now disputed. People need abolition by President of India MS Droupadi Murmur by cancelation of temporary official in favor of Supreme Court. Supreme Court subject to control of British colonialism judiciary not subject to recognition and control of preamble of constitution not acceptable to people. There is no liability imposed upon concerned area competent authorities to dispose of complaints of people victims of atrocities exploitation and corruption enfringement of rights so indisciplined judges advocates patrakars and political parties invade sovereignty of government of India liable to be prosecuted under seditious conspiracy statute. Judiciary subject to recognition and control of Preamble of constitution of India should enact democratic laws to overcome lapses and irregularities of legislature executive and judiciary under control of government of India.
VS
British colonialism judiciary subject to recognition and control of Supreme Court should be revoked from Supreme Court by President of India incorporated temporarily in article 50 in 1950 to deal with by Supreme Court for time being not for 75years to continue alien rules of laws harmful to people enfringement of rights in 5 crore backlog cases pending and 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners.